logo

Experimental study of the 9Li breakup reaction on Pb target

Special Section on the Celebration for 55 Years’ Dedicated Research on Heavy-Ion Physics of Natowitz and his 80th Birthday

Experimental study of the 9Li breakup reaction on Pb target

Wei-Hu Ma
Jian-Song Wang
Yan-Yun Yang
Shi-Lun Jin
Jun-Bing Ma
Peng Ma
D. Patel
Xing-Quan Liu
Zhen Bai
Mei-Rong Huang
Qiang Hu
Zhi-Hao Gao
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.28, No.12Article number 177Published in print 01 Dec 2017Available online 20 Nov 2017
45606

The breakup reaction of 9Li on a Pb target has been measured at 32.7 MeV/nucleon for the first time. Two peaks of 6He+t coincident fragments at 9.8 MeV and 12.5 MeV were observed and agree with the results of the GCM (generator coordinate method) calculation. The experiment was carried out thanks to a specially arranged detection system around zero degrees at the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou, Radioactive Ion Beam Line in Lanzhou (HIRFL-RIBLL).

Breakup reactionNuclear cluster statesInvariant mass method

1 Introduction

In recent years, with the development of RIB facilities, a large number of weakly bound nuclei are produced and have been extensively studied. Breakup reaction processes of weakly bound nuclei are important in the spectroscopy since the observables in the breakup reactions are strongly correlated to the microscopic structures of the ground and continuum states of weakly bound nuclei. These breakup reactions of weakly bound nuclei play important roles in researching the cluster resonance structure. Elucidating the mechanism of clustering in nuclei is of fundamental importance not only for nuclear many-body dynamics, but also for understanding some key processes in nuclear astrophysics [1]. The interest in nuclear clustering has been pushed strongly due to the study of neutron-rich and exotic weakly bound nuclei [2]. Many theoretical and experimental studies have been devoted to the cluster structure in nuclei in the past decades [3-9]. The missing mass method and invariant mass method can be applied to determine the excitation energy in the breakup reaction process. Several experimental studies of light nuclear clustering at HIRFL-RIBLL were performed. The RIBLL has been constructed at HIRFL and has been in operation since 1998. Consisting of four dipoles and sixteen quadrupoles, RIBLL is designed as a double-achromatic anti-symmetry separator with three focal points (F0, F2, and F4) and two focal planes (F1 and F3). RIBLL is a Projectile Fragmentation (PF) type facility with a large momentum acceptance and solid angle [10, 11]. In a representative example carried out at HIRFL-RIBLL, new resonances close to the respective cluster separation thresholds were observed in 12Be for the 4He + 8He and 6He + 6He decay channels based on an inelastic excitation experiment performed with a 12Be beam at 29 MeV/u on a carbon target [12, 13]. The strong clustering in 12Be with 0+ state at 10.3 MeV is well demonstrated by using the model-independent angular correlation analysis and the extracted largely enhanced monopole transition matrix element of 7.0±1.0 fm2 for this state.

For the neutron-rich nucleus, 9Li, many theoretical descriptions of the cluster structures have been studied, but experimental investigations are scarce. The cluster structures of 6He+t, α+t+2n, and t+t+t in excited states of 9Li were predicted by references [14-19]. In 1968, Ikeda et al. proposed a threshold rule for cluster formation, which suggests appearances of developed cluster states near the corresponding threshold energy [20]. They speculated that at the vicinity of an energy threshold for cluster separation, the nucleus tends to expand its size and favor the cluster formation in consequence [21]. From the point of view of Ikeda’s threshold rule, excitation energies of developed two-body cluster states in neutron-rich nuclei can be understood systematically. The possible appearance of 6He+t cluster states near the 6He+t threshold energy in excited states of 9Li can be expected [17]. To describe various cluster and shell structures that may appear in the ground and excited states of light nuclei, studies of T. Suhara et al. [15] show that, in the prolate region along the γ= 0o line, two-body cluster structures or linear-chainlike structures develop well as the deformation parameter, β, becomes large. They show a 6He+t cluster configuration when (βcosγ, βsinγ)= (1.03, 0.04).

The present experiment was carried out thanks to a specially arranged detection system around zero degrees at HIRFL-RIBLL to observe the cluster structures in 9Li through analyzing the coincident breakup fragments.

2 Description of the experiment

The primary beam is 12C of 53.7 MeV/u delivered by the HIRFL. The RIBs were produced by bombarding the production target, Be with a thickness of 3038 μM, and analyzed and delivered to the secondary reaction chamber at the second focal point by RIBLL. We obtained a 32.7 MeV/nucleon secondary 9Li beam with an intensity of about 1.1×103 particles per second and a purity of about 99%. The beam particle identification was realized event by event using the measured time-of-flight (TOF) and energy loss (ΔE) values (see Fig. 2). The Pb target was a self-supported foil with a thickness of 526.9 mg/cm2.

Figure 2:
(Color online) ΔE-TOF spectrum for identifying particles of the secondary beam.
pic

In Fig. 1, a schematic view of the detector setup is given. Three position-sensitive parallel-plate avalanche counters (PPACs) [22] provided the position of the incoming beams with a position resolution better than 1 mm. Each PPAC had 51 gold-plated tungsten wires in both X and Y directions and a sensitive area of 50×50 mm. We successively placed the PPAC1, PPAC2, and PPAC3 at 1207 mm, 817 mm, and 112 mm before target. The position and incident angle of the beam particles at the target were determined by extrapolating the position information provided by PPACs event by event. A telescope consisted of two detectors and an E detector covering the angles 0° to 10°. The two detectors are double-sided silicon strip detectors (DSSDs) with a thickness of 523 μM for the DSSD1 and 527 μM for the DSSD2 and a sensitive area of 49×49 mm which is divided into 16 strips with the width of 3 mm and the interval of 0.1 mm between each two of them in each side. These two DSSDs were also applied to determine the position of the outgoing particles with a position resolution better than 3 mm. The E detector is a CsI(Tl) scintillator array which is composed of 8×8 CsI(Tl) crystals [23]. The active area of each scintillator unit is 21×21 mm2 for the front side and 23×23 mm2 for the back side, the length of each crystal is 5 cm. The DSSD1, DSSD2, and scintillator were successively placed at 40 mm, 133 mm, and 583 mm behind the target. A typical particle identification is given in Fig. 3 where ΔE is the energy loss of particles in the detector DSSD2 and E is the residue energy deposited in the CsI(Tl) crystal. A clear separation of different nuclei is obtained. The shown nuclei p, d, t, α, 6He, 7Li, and 8Li, are the breakup fragments from 9Li on the Pb target. In our present investigation, we mainly take into account the two fragments recorded in coincidence. We applied the recorded positions by the detectors (PPACs, DSSDs, and CsI(Tl)) to reconstruct the tracks of the two charged fragments from the 9Li breakup reaction on the Pb target. Energy calibrations of the telescope were achieved using beams of 9Li, 6He, 4He, and 3H produced from the 12C primary beam. The energy resolutions are about 65 keV for DSSD1 and 47 keV for DSSD2 measured with a single-component (241Am) and a three-component (241Am-238Pu-239Pu) alpha source. The estimated energy resolution of the CsI scintillators are 7%8% determined with a three-component (239Pu-241Am-244Cm) alpha source. For a proton beam at the energy of 15 MeV, the resolution is 2.6%. A description of this kind of telescope array can be found in Refs. [24, 25].

Figure 1:
(Color online) Schematic view of the detector setup; see text for details.
pic
Figure 3:
(Color online) A typical particle identification spectrum obtained in the telescope array. The shown nuclei p (proton), d (deuton), t (triton), 8Li, 7Li, 6He, and α are the breakup fragments from 9Li on Pb target.
pic

In the present work, the relative energy (Erel) of a pair of fragments was reconstructed from their kinetic energies (T1, T2) and the opening angle (θ12). According to the invariant mass method, the excitation energy of a resonance state is expressed as [26]

M2=i=1,2(Ei2+Pi2)=M12+M22+2(M1+T1)(M2+T2)2(T12+2M1T1)(T22+2M2T2)cos(θ12),Ex=MM0,Erel=ExEthres, (1)

where, M0 is the rest mass of projectile; Ethres is the threshold energy of the corresponding decay; Ei and Pi are the energy and momentum of the fragment, i, respectively; Ex is the excitation energy. The reconstructed excitation energy of 6He+t decay is shown in Fig. 5.

Figure 5:
(Color online) The Ex spectrum with Gaussian function fitting for 9Li, reconstructed from the 6He+t coincident fragments.
pic

Through analyzing the telescope array, the coincident charged particles 6He and t were identified and investigated. To estimate the resolution of the Erel and the detection efficiency (acceptance) for these 6He+t events, the Monte Carlo simulation was performed considering the energy and spacial resolutions of the detectors. The simulation is plotted in Fig. 4(a) and (b). Where, the detection efficiency (peak at 37%) for the 6He+t channel is shown in Fig. 4(a). The drop down of distribution of the detection efficiency in case of small relative energies is due to the ineffectiveness of the coincident measurement for 6He+t fragments which enter into the same unit of the DSSDs or CsI(Tl) scintillator; the slow decrease of that (distribution of the detection efficiency) in case of large relative energies is due to one or both of coincident fragments may escape from the detector array with appreciable probabilities. As shown in the Fig. 4(b), the simulated resolution of the Erel is about 0.8 MeV at an Erel of 2.5 MeV and increases to 1.1 MeV at an Erel of 5.0 MeV.

Figure 4:
(Color online) The detection efficiency (a) and the resolution of the Erel (b) for the 6He+t events produced by the Monte Carlo simulation.
pic

3 Results and discussion

In the present experimental study of a 9Li breakup reaction on Pb target, we reconstructed the excitation energy spectrum of 6He+t decay. As displayed in Fig.5, two resonance peaks just above the threshold energy (7.588 MeV) were obtained. We made a double-Gaussian function fitting and got the peaks at 9.8 MeV for the first and 12.5 MeV for the second. The GCM calculation for 6He+t cluster states in 9Li in Ref. [17] suggests that the energies of the third 3/2- and the second 1/2- states with relative orbital angular momentum L=1 lie within the range of the first peak at around 9.8 MeV, and those of the sencond 5/2- and 7/2- states with L=3 lie within the range of the second peak at around 12.5 MeV. The experimental values are slightly larger than the theoretical ones. However, it can be considered that the obtained values reproduce the data fairly well. Based on the present experimental analysis and the theoretical predictions, the picture of 6He+t clustering just above the 6He+t threshold energy in 9Li might be supported. With considering the detection efficiency of the Δ E-E telescope and the effective incident beam particles at a target determined by extrapolating the position information provided by PPACs event by event, the experimental breakup cross section was deduced to be 1.5±0.3(stat.) mb for 6He+t decaying channel.

4 Summary

In summary, the experiment of the 9Li breakup reaction on a Pb target was carried out thanks to a specially arranged ΔE-E telescope system around zero degrees at the HIRFL-RIBLL. The breakup fragments p, d, t, 8Li, 7Li, 6He, and α were identified by the ΔE-E telescope. Combining the analysis of tracks of the two charged fragments, coincident charged particles, 6He and t, were identified and investigated. The excitation energy of 6He+t decay was reconstructed by using the invariant mass method. Two resonant energies at 9.8 MeV and 12.5 MeV were observed, which agree with the GCM calculations. The present experimental analysis and the theoretical predictions might support the appearance of 6He+t cluster states in 9Li.

References
[1] M. Chernykh, H. Feldmeier, T. Neff, et al.

Structure of the Hoyle State in 12C

. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98: 032501. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.032501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] W. von Oertzen, M. Freer, Y. Kanada-En’yo.

Nuclear clusters and nuclear molecules

. Phys. Rep., 2006, 432: 43-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.07.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] M. Ito, N. Itagaki, H. Sakurai, et al.

Coexistence of covalent superdeformation and molecular resonances in an unbound region of 12Be

. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008, 100: 182502. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.182502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] N. Soić, S. Blagus, M. Bogovac, et al.

6He + alpha clustering in 10Be

. Europhys. Lett., 1996, 34: 7-12. DOI: 10.1209/epl/i1996-00407-y
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] J. A. Liendo,N. Curtis, D. D. Caussyn, et al.

Near threshold three-body final states in 7Li+7Li reactions at Elab = 34 MeV

. Phys. Rev. C, 2002, 65: 034317. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.65.034317
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] M. Milin, M. Zadro, S. Cherubini, et al.

Sequential decay reactions induced by a 18 MeV 6He beam on 6Li and 7Li

. Nucl. Phys. A, 2005, 753: 263-287. DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.154
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] M. Freer, E. Casarejos, L. Achouri, et al.

α:2n:α Molecular band in 10Be

. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 96: 042501. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.042501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] M. Freer, J.C. Angélique, L. Axelsson, et al.

Exotic Molecular States in 12Be

. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, 82: 1383-1386. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1383
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] M. Freer, J. C. Angélique, L. Axelsson, et al.

Helium breakup states in 10Be and 12Be

. Phys. Rev. C, 2001, 63: 034301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.63.034301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] Z. Sun, W. Zhan, Z. Guo, et al.

Separation and identification of isotopes produced from 20Ne+Be reaction by radioactive ion beam line in Lanzhou

. Chinese Physics Letters, 1998, 15: 790. DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/15/11/004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] Z. Sun, W.-L. Zhan, Z.-Y. Guo, et al.

RIBLL, the radioactive ion beam line in Lanzhou

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 2003, 503: 496. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01005-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] Z.H. Yang, Y.L. Ye, Z.H. Li, et al.

Observation of enhanced monopole strength and clustering in 12Be

. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2014, 112:162501. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.162501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] Z.H. Yang, Y.L. Ye, Z.H. Li, et al.

Helium-helium clustering states in 12Be

. Phys. Rev. C, 2015, 91: 024304. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024304
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] K. Arai, Y. Ogawa, Y. Suzuki, et al.

Microscopic Multicluster Description of Light Exotic Nuclei with Stochastic Variational Method on Correlated Gaussians

. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 2001, 142: 97-156. DOI: 10.1143/PTPS.142.97
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] T. Suhara, Y. Kanada-En’yo.

Quadrupole Deformation β and γ Constraint in a framework of antisymmetrized molecular dynamics

. Prog. Theor. Phys., 2010, 123: 303-325. DOI: 10.1143/PTP.123.303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] K. Muta, T. Furumoto, T. Ichikawa, et al.

Three triton states in 9Li

. Phys. Rev. C, 2011, 84: 034305. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.034305
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] Y. Kanada-En’yo, T. Suhara.

6He-triton cluster states in 9Li

. Phys. Rev. C, 2012, 85: 024303. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.024303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] T. Furumoto, T. Suhara, N. Itagaki.

Investigation of the 3/22− state of 9Li with microscopic structure and reaction models

. Phys. Rev. C, 2013, 87: 064320. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.064320
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] Y. Kanada-En’yo.

Monopole transitions to cluster states in 10Be and 9Li

. Phys. Rev. C, 2016, 94: 024326. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024326
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] K. Ikeda, N. Takigawa, H. Horiuchi.

The Systematic Structure-Change into the Molecule-like Structures in the Self-Conjugate 4n Nuclei

. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 1968, E68: 464-475. DOI: 10.1143/PTPS.E68.464
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] K. Ikeda, H. Horiuchi, S. Saito.

Chapter I. Introduction to Comprehensive Nuclear Structure Study Based on Cluster Correlations and Molecular Viewpoint

. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 1980, 68: 1-28. DOI: 10.1143/PTPS.68.1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] P. Ma, C.G. Lu, J.S. Wang, et al.

Capability of PPAC in investigation of resonant properties in 18Ne via 17F+p

. At. Energy Sci. Technol., 2011, 45(3): 356-359.(in Chinese)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] X. W. Yao, Y.Y. Yang, J.S. Wang, et al.

Development of 8×8 CsI(Tl) array detector

. At. Energy Sci. Technol., 2010, 44(3): 358-361.(in Chinese)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] S.L. Jin, J.S. Wang, Y.Y. Yang, et al.

A Δ-E telescope array for radioactive beam experiments

. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B, 2013, 317:728-730. DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2013.07.044
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] S. L. Jin, J.S. Wang, M. Wang, et al.

Application of ΔE-E telescope in 9C fragmentation reaction

. At. Energy Sci. Technol., 2012, 46: 385-389.(in Chinese)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] Z. X. Cao, Y.L. Ye, J. Xiao, et al.

Recoil proton tagged knockout reaction for 8He

. Phys. Lett. B, 2012, 707: 46-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.12.009
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar