logo

Measurement of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities for different parts of medicinal aromatic plants in low-energy region

NUCLEAR ENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

Measurement of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities for different parts of medicinal aromatic plants in low-energy region

M.I. Sayyed
F. Akman
I.H. Geçibesler
H.O. Tekin
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.29, No.10Article number 144Published in print 01 Oct 2018Available online 30 Aug 2018
45400

The mass attenuation coefficients (µ/ρ) for different parts (root, flower, stem, and leaf) of three medicinal aromatic plants (Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum, Rheum ribes, and Chrysophthalmum montanum) were measured using an 241Am photon source in a stable geometry and calculated using the Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System-extended (MCNPX) code and the WinXCOM program. The experimental and theoretical MCNPX and WinXCOM values exhibited good agreement. The measured mass attenuation coefficient values were then used to compute the effective atomic number (Zeff) and electron density (NE)of the samples. The results reveal that S1-S (stem of Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum) has the highest values of µ/ρand Zeff.

Medicinal aromatic plantMCNPX codeMass attenuation coefficientPhotonWinXCOM

1. Introduction

Ionizing radiation is energy emitted from radioactive atoms in the form of particles (such as alpha, beta, and neutron) or electromagnetic waves (such as X-rays and gamma rays). Gamma rays and X-rays are chargeless and massless photons; thus, they are the most penetrating forms of ionizing radiation. Humans are exposed to ionizing radiation through different processes, such as diagnostic treatment of various cancers, nuclear power generation, and medical radiation exposure from X-rays. It is well-known that exposure to ionizing radiation leads to the ionization of several biologically important macromolecules, including membranes, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids [1, 2].Ionizing radiation passing through living tissues results in the generation of reactive O species, which interact with DNA, causing cell damage, dysfunction, or death [3].In recent decades, various studies have been performed to protect humans from the hurtful effects of ionizing radiation and to develop a novel and active radio protector [4].In this regard, numerous compounds have been investigated for their capability as a radio-protective material, such as vitamins, amino acids, plants, glasses and herbs [49].Radio-protective materials should be highly effective, cheap, orally administered, and without toxicity implications. Natural products such as plants have all of these properties. It is well-known that medicinal plants are utilized in different traditional systems of medicine because they are considered non-toxic and are exceedingly accepted by people. The use of medicinal plants as radio-protective materials requires scientific evaluation and assessment. The precise values of photon interaction parameters, such as the mass attenuation coefficient and effective atomic number, are needed to clarify the interaction of photons with medicinal plants. The mass attenuation coefficient (µ/ρ) for a medicinal plant indicates how easily it can be penetrated by a photon. This coefficient is considered to be one of the most important parameters characterizing the interaction between ionizing radiation and a specific medium and can be used to calculate other parameters, such as the effective atomic number and electron density [10, 11]. There are different methods for calculating the mass attenuation coefficients for a specific photon energy and material, including a theoretical approach employing the WinXCOM program [12], an experimental method using transmission geometry [1315], and simulation codes such as Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System-extended (MCNPX), Geant4, and FLUKA[10, 16, 17].

In the present study, we used the transmission geometry to measure the mass attenuation coefficients of different parts (root, flower, stem, and leaf) of three medicinal aromatic plants (Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp.sinuatum, Rheum ribes and Chrysophthalmum montanum). Additionally, we used the MCNPX code and the WinXCOM program to validate the obtained values. Using the obtained mass attenuation coefficients, we calculated related parameters, such as the effective atomic number and electron density.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sample preparation

Details regarding the localities of the plant samples used in the study are presented in Table1.The samples were collected from natural habitats and transferred to the laboratory. The plant samples were divided into target organs while in the wet state. The target plant organs were allowed to be dried on unprinted papers in the laboratory. A laboratory-type mill was used to pulverize the dried plant samples. The powdered plant specimens were passed through a laboratory sieve and brought to a 20-mesh particle size. The milled plant samples were pelleted using a laboratory-type hydraulic pellet press.

Table 1.
Herbarium numbers, gathering times, localities, and coordinates of plant samples
Plant samples Localities Coordinates Herbarium numbers Gathering times
Rheum ribes Bingöl-Yelesen village rocky slopes 1750 m N: 38°52′09.2″ KOCAK-4232 20.06.2017
    E: 40°19′26.5″
Chrysophthalmum montanum Diyarbakır-Kulp district vicinity, 1425 m N: 38°30′23.3″ KOCAK-4231 16.06.2016
    E: 41°05′44.6″
Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum Bingöl-Sancak district and surrounding slopes 1550 m N:39°10′31.2″ BIN-782 08.07.2016
    E:40°22′16.8″    
Show more

The total organic content in the samples was analyzed using a spectrometer (FLASH 2000 Series CHNS / Organic Elemental Analyzer, Thermo Scientific). The total C, H, and N contents in each plant sample were determined according to the European standard EN15104:2011 [18], which suggests the following formula for the amount of O in the samples:

(%)=100[C% +H%+N%](Lightest Moist Basis). (1)

The chemical compositions, densities, and codes of the present medicinal aromatic plants are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.
Chemical compositions of medicinal aromatic plants
Sample Used part Sample code Density (g/cm3) H (%) C (%) N (%) O (%)
Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum root S1-R 1.051 4.963 92.989 0.866 1.182
Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum flower S1-F 1.152 4.560 35.080 1.821 58.539
Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum stem S1-S 1.001 2.875 22.235 0.965 73.925
Rheum ribes stem S2-S 1.273 6.702 40.663 0.871 51.764
Rheum ribes root S2-R 1.135 4.368 65.964 0.736 28.932
Rheum ribes leaf S2-L 1.001 11.448 47.435 2.425 38.691
Chrysophthalmum montanum stem S3-S 1.367 5.308 51.544 0.674 42.474
Chrysophthalmum montanum leaf S3-L 1.093 5.383 56.705 1.525 36.387
Chrysophthalmum montanum flower S3-F 1.042 5.317 52.690 1.519 40.475
Show more
2.2. Experimental work

The spectrometer system comprised a Si(Li) semiconductor detector (SLP-04160P-OPT-0.3) having an energy resolution of 2.7% at 5.9 keV, a 12.5-mm2 active area, and a 5-mm sensitive depth.A4K multichannel analyzer was used to measure the mass attenuation coefficients of the medicinal aromatic plants. An 241Am photon source having activity of 370 kBq was used to irradiate the plant samples. This source provided the following useful photon energies: 13.92, 17.75, 20.78, 26.34, and 59.54 keV.

The radioactive source enclosed in a lead cylinder with a 3-mm orifice was collimated to produce a narrow beam. The experimental narrow-beam geometry setup is shown in Fig. 1.The distance between the source and detector was 15 cm. The detector was housed in a lead shield to minimize the detection of background radiation from the surroundings. Each plant sample was placed between the source and detector. Then, the photon intensities I0 (incident) and I (after attenuation) were measured by recording corresponding counts for a fixed preset time. For each sample, gamma-ray intensities without (Io) and after attenuation (I) were used to calculate the mass attenuation coefficients using the Lambert–Beer law[17].More extensive information regarding the experimental process is presented in our previous works [1921]. A typical spectrum of 13.92 keV with and without attenuation by the S2-S, S2-L, and S2-R samples is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1.
(Color online) Narrow beam transmission geometry
pic
Fig. 2.
(Color online) A typical spectrum of 13.92 keV with and without attenuation by S2-S, S2-L and S2-R samples
pic
2.3. MCNPX code

The Monte Carlo method is one of the best ways to resolve physical problems, medical difficulties, and unknown parameters when the experimental or clinical conditions are limited or difficult to attain. MCNPX version 2.6.0 (Los Alamos National Lab, USA) was utilized for the calculations of the mass attenuation coefficients of different parts of three medicinal aromatic plants. The MCNPX code is a general-purpose Monte Carlo radiation transport code for simulating the interaction of radiation with matter in a wide energy range [22]. MCNPX can ensure fully three-dimensional simulation and utilizes extended nuclear cross-section libraries and physics models for particle types. The validation of the MCNPX Monte Carlo code for the investigation of radiation mass attenuation coefficients and other shielding parameters for different types of materials—such as glasses, concrete, and living biological tissues—has been reported [2333]. The computational modeling of radiation interaction problems, including the radiation attenuation and shielding properties,depends on the material definitions. The input structure of the MCNPX code has three major partsdefining the significant details of the simulation. A completed MCNPX input file describes the problem geometry and defines the materials with their chemical compositions, as well as the structure of the radiation source,including details such as the source geometry andradiation distribution. The simulation geometry is constructed by defining cells. Each cell in the simulation is bounded by one or more geometric surfaces. In the present investigation, the square prism geometry was employed for modeling the parts of medicinal aromatic plants. The edge lengths of this square prism geometry were defined as 5 cm, while the axial z-length was set differentlyfor each simulation because it represents the thickness of the parts of the medicinal aromatic plants. The mass attenuation coefficients of each part of the medicinal aromatic plant sample were measured in a narrow beam transmission geometry using a point isotropic source with a collimated and monoenergetic beam. The radiation energy value of the point isotropic source was defined in the photon energy range of 13.92–59.54 keV for each calculation. The geometric center of the detection area on the central axis was considered as the location of the point isotropic source that emits gamma rays perpendicular to the front face of the medicinal aromatic plant sample in the direction of the z axis. Another important definition is the material definition, considering the atomic number, mass number, elemental mass fraction, and density of compounds or mixtures. The elemental mass fractions and densities of each medicinal aromatic plant sample are presented in Table 2. In the present MCNPX simulation, to obtain the absorbed dose amount in the detection field, the average flux tally (F4) was utilized. This type of tally mash gives the sum of the average flux in the cell. The initial quantity of gamma rays is set as 108 particles. The mass attenuation coefficient calculations were performed using Intel® Core™ i7 CPU 2.80 GHz computer hardware. The error rate in the output file was observed to be <0.1%. Analysis of a recent investigation was performed using the D00205ALLCP03 MCNPXDATA package, whichcomprisesDLC-200/MCNPDATA cross-section libraries. This library typically includes ENDF/B-VI data in the range of 20 to 150 MeV. Fig. 3 shows the total simulation geometry for the present investigation.A screenshot showing the design of the MCNPX simulation setup is displayed in Fig.4.

Fig. 3.
(Color online) Total simulation geometry of the present investigated samples
pic
Fig. 4.
(Color online)The screenshot of MCNPX simulation setup
pic

3. Results and discussion

Different photon attenuation coefficients—such as the mass attenuation coefficients (µ/ρ), effective atomic number (Zeff), and electron density (Ne)—of different parts (root, flower, stem, and leaf) of three medicinal aromatic plants (Teucrium chamaedrys L.subsp. sinuatum, Rheum ribes, and Chrysophthalmum montanum) were investigated. The µ/ρ values of the present samples were obtained in three ways: (a) experimentally, using a transmission arrangement; (b) theoretically, using the WinXCOM program; and (c) using a Monte Carlo simulation (MCNPX code). The experimental and WinXCOM results for the µ/ρ of the present samples at 13.92, 17.75, 20.78, 26.34, and 59.54 keV are illustrated in Fig.5, while the experimental and MCNPX results for the µ/ρ of all the samples are shown in Fig.6. The experimental, WinXCOM, and MCNPX results for the µ/ρ are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.
Experimental and theoretical values of mass attenuation coefficient for medicinal aromatic plants
Code 13.92 keV 17.75 keV 20.78 keV 26.34 keV 59.54 keV
  Exp WinX MCNPX Exp WinX. MCNPX Exp WinX MCNPX Exp WinX MCNPX Exp WinX MCNPX
S1-R 0.990±0.092 0.957 0.969 0.526±0.015 0.555 0.570 0.407±0.020 0.416 0.423 0.285±0.031 0.300 0.310 0.178±0.013 0.184 0.195
S1-F 1.641±0.052 1.713 1.722 0.926±0.062 0.912 0.922 0.654±0.012 0.636 0.659 0.400±0.016 0.405 0.413 0.184±0.008 0.192 0.200
S1-S 1.997±0.044 1.914 1.921 0.965±0.025 1.005 1.118 0.665±0.007 0.692 0.703 0.409±0.010 0.431 0.443 0.181±0.005 0.192 0.201
S2-S 1.538±0.041 1.606 1.621 0.854±0.052 0.863 0.875 0.624±0.067 0.607 0.627 0.400±0.014 0.393 0.627 0.184±0.007 0.194 0.201
S2-R 1.285±0.063 1.319 1.326 0.698±0.061 0.726 0.749 0.502±0.011 0.521 0.534 0.335±0.017 0.350 0.534 0.184±0.008 0.187 0.190
S2-L 1.351±0.082 1.390 1.401 0.739±0.014 0.766 0.776 0.559±0.017 0.551 0.576 0.354±0.026 0.371 0.576 0.193±0.012 0.200 0.210
S3-S 1.528±0.155 1.491 1.511 0.837±0.016 0.808 0.837 0.546±0.024 0.572 0.595 0.389±0.032 0.375 0.397 0.194±0.013 0.191 0.195
S3-L 1.469±0.102 1.420 1.433 0.749±0.017 0.774 0.785 0.526±0.021 0.551 0.575 0.356±0.057 0.365 0.378 0.188±0.014 0.190 0.199
S3-F 1.394±0.088 1.468 1.481 0.781±0.012 0.797 0.803 0.544±0.023 0.565 0.577 0.383±0.025 0.372 0.389 0.195±0.011 0.190 0.206
Show more
Fig. 5.
(Color online) Comparison of mass attenuation coefficients calculated by WinXCOM with respect to experiment for the present medicinal aromatic plants
pic
Fig. 6.
(Color online) Comparison of mass attenuation coefficients calculated by MCNPX code with respect to experiment for the present medicinal aromatic plants
pic

The tendency of µ/ρ is almost the same for all samples owing to the similarity of the elemental compositions among the samples (all the samples contain H, C, N, and O in different proportions).

Figs.5 and 6 clearly show that the experimentally measured µ/ρ values of the medicinal aromatic plants agree well with the WinXCOM and MCNPX results. The present experimental WinXCOM and MCNPX results are similar to the observations of Singh et al. [25],who studied the µ/ρ of polymers in the energy range of 59.5–1,332.5 MeV using Monte Carlo simulation (MCNP-4C) and reported good agreement among theirMCNP-4C,XCOM,and experimental results. The µ/ρ values for all samples decrease with the increase of the photon energy. This means that with the increase of the energy of the incident photons, we obtain smaller attenuation; thus, more photons can penetrate the present samples.

The differences among the µ/ρ values due to the medicinal aromatic plant compositions are obvious, particularly in the low-energy region. As shown in Table 3, S1-S (stem of Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum) has higher values of µ/ρ than the other samples because of the larger amount of O in this sample (73.925%).Additionally, Table 3 shows that the S1-R sample has the lowest µ/ρ values, as this sample contains mainly C (92.989%), while the percent of O in this sample is low (1.182%).It is important to investigate the experimental uncertainty in the measurement of µ/ρ.The following equation was used for this:

Δ(μρ)=1ρx(ΔI0I0)2+(ΔII)2+(InI0I)2.(Δρxρx)2, (2)

where x and ρ represent the thickness and density of the sample, respectively, and ΔI0 and ΔI are the uncertainties of I0 and I, respectively.

Eq. (2) was used to calculate the experimental uncertainty in the measurement of µ/ρ, and the results are summarized in Table 3. Clearly, the uncertainties in the experimental µ/ρ measurements are within the range of 1.09% to 10.73% (except for S1-R and S3-F at 26.34 keV). The uncertainties in the measurements are mainly due to statistical uncertainties in the determination of the intensity without (I0) and with (I) the absorber, as well as to the scattered photons reaching the detector.

By usingthemeasured and calculateddatafor µ/ρ, the effective atomic numbers (Zeff) were calculatedas follows [34]:

Zeff=ifiAi(μ/ρ)ijfjAjZj(μρ)j, (3)

where fi represents the fractional abundance of the element i relative to the number of atoms, and Zi and Ai are the atomic number and atomic weight, respectively. The results for the Zeff of the selected samples are plotted with respect to the photon energy in Fig. 7.In addition, the experimental Zeff values are presented in Table 4, together with theoretical values. The Zeff results indicate good agreement between the experiment and theory. As shown in Table 4, the values of Zeff for all the medicinal aromatic plants change with respect to the photon energy. In the case of Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum, Zeff ranges from 5.692 to 4.047, 6.725 to 4.613, and 7.744 to 5.348 for the root, flower, and stem, respectively. In the case of Rheum ribes, Zeff ranges from 6.419 to 3.954, 6.226 to 4.499, and 5.795 to 3.107 for the stem, root, and leaf, respectively. In the case of Chrysophthalmum montanum, Zeff ranges from 6.790 to 4.547, 6.720 to 4.338, and 6.247 to 4.512 for the stem, leaf, and flower, respectively. Notably, the atomic numbers (Z) of the elements of the present medicinal aromatic plants change from 1 (H) to 8 (O), and a total of four elements (H, C, N, and O) are considered. The values of Zeff for the present plants lie within the range of Z for the constituent elements (1<Zeff<8). As indicated by the µ/ρ results, S1-S (stem of Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum) has higher values of Zeff.

Table 4.
Experimental and theoretical values of effective atomic number for medicinal aromatic plants
Code 13.92 keV 17.75 keV 20.78 keV 26.34 keV 59.54 keV
  Exp Theo Exp Theo Exp Theo Exp Theo Exp Theo
S1-R 5.692±0.527 5.500 4.900±0.142 5.169 4.824±0.232 4.938 4.392±0.484 4.630 4.047±0.288 4.164
S1-F 6.725±0.211 7.022 6.740±0.452 6.637 6.506±0.115 6.321 5.734±0.234 5.816 4.613±0.194 4.821
S1-S 7.744±0.169 7.420 6.880±0.178 7.167 6.678±0.073 6.945 6.235±0.154 6.561 5.348±0.138 5.678
S2-S 6.419±0.172 6.703 6.130±0.376 6.195 5.961±0.640 5.801 5.294±0.186 5.212 3.954±0.146 4.176
S2-R 6.226±0.303 6.391 5.790±0.502 6.020 5.528±0.125 5.735 5.092±0.256 5.311 4.499±0.192 4.575
S2-L 5.795±0.354 5.962 5.067±0.096 5.252 4.843±0.150 4.768 3.949±0.294 4.130 3.107±0.185 3.205
S3-S 6.790±0.688 6.629 6.427±0.122 6.199 5.601±0.244 5.864 5.552±0.454 5.358 4.547±0.301 4.456
S3-L 6.720±0.466 6.499 5.868±0.130 6.066 5.463±0.219 5.733 5.112±0.818 5.239 4.338±0.329 4.382
S3-F 6.247±0.396 6.580 6.025±0.096 6.144 5.588±0.236 5.806 5.458±0.355 5.300 4.512±0.265 4.409
Show more
Fig. 7.
(Color online) The experimentally measured effective atomic numbers for the present medicinal aromatic plants in comparison with those obtained by WinXCOM
pic

Zeff is related to another parameter called the effective electron density (NE), which represents the number of electrons per unit mass of the interacting materials and can be calculated using the following relation [35]:

NE=NAntotZeffiniAi=NAZeffA, (4)

where ˂A˃ is the mean atomic mass, and NA is the Avogadro constant. The determined NE for the present samples are plotted in Fig.8 and listed in Table 5. As shown in Fig.8, the experimental and theoretical (WinXCOM) values agree well. It is also clear from Fig.8that the NE for all samples decreases with increasing energy owing to the dominance of the photoelectric effect in this energy region.

Table 5.
Experimental and theoretical values of effective electron density (×1025) for medicinal aromatic plants
Code 13.92 keV 17.75 keV 20.78 keV 26.34 keV 59.54 keV
  Exp Theo Exp Theo Exp Theo Exp Theo Exp Theo
S1-R 0.945±0.087 0.913 0.813±0.024 0.858 0.801±0.039 0.820 0.729±0.080 0.769 0.672±0.048 0.691
S1-F 0.464±0.015 0.484 0.465±0.031 0.458 0.449±0.008 0.436 0.395±0.016 0.401 0.318±0.013 0.333
S1-S 0.845±0.018 0.809 0.750±0.019 0.782 0.728±0.008 0.758 0.680±0.017 0.716 0.583±0.015 0.619
S2-S 1.102±0.029 1.150 1.052±0.064 1.063 1.023±0.110 0.996 0.909±0.032 0.895 0.679±0.025 0.717
S2-R 1.108±0.054 1.138 1.031±0.089 1.072 0.984±0.022 1.021 0.907±0.046 0.946 0.801±0.034 0.815
S2-L 0.479±0.029 0.492 0.419±0.008 0.434 0.400±0.012 0.394 0.326±0.024 0.341 0.257±0.015 0.265
S3-S 1.383±0.140 1.350 1.309±0.025 1.263 1.141±0.050 1.194 1.131±0.093 1.091 0.926±0.061 0.908
S3-L 0.614±0.043 0.594 0.536±0.012 0.555 0.500±0.020 0.524 0.467±0.075 0.479 0.397±0.030 0.401
S3-F 0.566±0.036 0.596 0.546±0.009 0.557 0.506±0.021 0.526 0.495±0.032 0.480 0.409±0.024 0.400
Show more
Fig. 8.
(Color online) The experimentally measured effective electron densities for the present medicinal aromatic plants in comparison with those obtained by WinXCOM
pic

4. Conclusion

This work aimed to measure the mass attenuation coefficient (µ/ρ) for different parts (root, flower, stem, and leaf) of three medicinal aromatic plants using an241Am photon source in a stable geometry. The µ/ρ for all samples under investigation wasalso calculated using the MCNPX code and the WinXCOM program. The µ/ρ values obtained using the three aforementioned methods were similar. Furthermore, the effective atomic numbers (Zeff) and the electron densities (NE) for the medicinal aromatic plants were calculated. The calculations indicate thatS1-S (stem of Teucrium chamaedrys L. subsp. sinuatum) has the highestvalues of µ/ρ and Zeff. The numerical methods and simulation tools employed in this study can be very useful for similar future studies, particularly for cases where it is not possible to perform experimental studies. Monte Carlo simulations are a viable alternative method when experimental investigations are not possible. The recent Monte Carlo method can encourage the scientific community to undertake similar studies and to better evaluate the biological structures and their radiation interaction properties.

References
1. K.B. Kalpana, N. Devipriya, M. Srinivasan et al.,

Evaluating the radioprotective effect of hesperidin in the liver of Swiss albino mice

. Eur. J. Pharmacol.658, 206-212 (2011).doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.02.031
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. K.B. Kalpana, N. Devipriya, M. Srinivasan et al.,

Investigation of the radioprotective efficacy of hesperidin against gamma-radiation induced cellular damage in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes

. Mutat. Res. 676, 54-61 (2009).doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.03.005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. W. Lee, W. Kang, N. Kim et al.,

Radioprotective effects of a polysaccharide purified from Lactobacillus plantarum-fermented Ishigeokamurae against oxidative stress caused by gamma ray-irradiation in zebrafish in vivo model

. J.Funct. Food.28, 83-89 (2017).doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.11.004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. S.J. Hosseinimehr,

Trends in the development of radioprotective agents

. Drug Discov. Today 12, 794-805 (2007).doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.07.017
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. A. Pezeshk,

The effects of ionizing radiation on DNA: the role of thiols as radioprotectors

.Life Sci. 74, 2423-2429 (2004).doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.068
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. R. Arora, D. Gupta, R. Chawla et al.,

Radioprotection by plant products: present status and future prospects

. Phytother. Res. 19, 1-22 (2005).doi: 10.1002/ptr.1605
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. M. Kurudirek,

Effective atomic numbers, water and tissue equivalence properties of human tissues, tissue equivalents and dosimetric materials for total electron interaction in the energy region 10 keV-1 GeV

. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 94, 1-7 (2014).doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.07.002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. M. Kurudirek,

Effective atomic numbers of different types of materials for proton interaction in the energy region 1 keV-10 GeV

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 336, 130-134 (2014).doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2014.07.008
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. M. Kurudirek, T. Onaran,

Calculation of effective atomic number and electron density of essential biomolecules for electron, proton, alpha particle and multi-energetic photon interactions

. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 112, 125-138 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.03.034
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. G. Lakshminarayana, A. Kumar, M.G. Dong et al.,

Exploration of gamma radiation shielding features for titanate bismuth borotellurite glasses using relevant software program and Monte Carlo simulation code

. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 481, 65-73 (2018).doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.10.027
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. A. Kumar, M.I. Sayyed, Mengge Dong et al.,

Effect of PbO on the shielding behavior of ZnO-P2O5 glass system using Monte Carlo simulation

.J. Non-Cryst. Solids 48, 604-607 (2018).doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.12.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. L. Gerward, N. Guilbert, K.B. Jensen et al.,

WinXCom - a program for calculating X-ray attenuation coefficients

. Radiat. Phys.Chem. 71, 653-654 (2004).doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.040
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. J. Kaewkhao, J. Laopaiboon, W. Chewpraditkul,

Determination of effective atomic numbers and effective electron densities for Cu/Zn alloy

. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra.109, 1260-1265 (2008).doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.10.007
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. S. Seven, I.H. Karahan, Ӧ.F. Bakkaloglu,

The measurement of total mass attenuation coeffcients of CoCuNi alloys

.J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra.83, 237-242 (2004).doi: 10.1016/S0022-4073(03)00118-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. M. Dong, X. Xue, A. Kumar et al.,

A novel method of utilization of hot dip galvanizing slag using the heat waste from itself for protection from radiation

. J. Hazard. Mater.344, 602-614 (2018).doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.066
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. B.O. Elbashir, M.G. Dong, M.I. Sayyed et al.,

Comparison of Monte Carlo simulation of gamma ray attenuation coefficients of amino acids with XCOM program and experimental data

. Results Phys.9, 6-11 (2018).doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.075
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. M.I. Sayyed, M.Y. AlZaatreh, M.G. Dong et al.,

A comprehensive study of the energy absorption and exposure buildup factors of different bricks for gamma-rays shielding

. Results Phys.7, 2528-2533 (2017).doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.07.028
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. British Standards Institute-BSI (2011):

Solid Biofuels Standards n°EN 14774-1:2009, EN 14775:2009, EN 15148:2009, EN 15104:2011, EN 15289:2011 [online]

. Available at http://www.standards.ie (accessed 21 January 2011).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. F. Akman, R. Durak, M.R. Kaçal et al.,

Study of absorption parameters around the K edge for selected compounds of Gd

X-ray Spectrom45(2), 103-110 (2016).doi: 10.1002/xrs.2676
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. F. Akman, R. Durak, M.F. Turhan et al.,

Studies on effective atomic numbers, electron densities from mass attenuation coefficients near the K edge in some samarium compounds

Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 101, 107-113 (2015).doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.04.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. F. Akman, M.R. Kaçal, F. Akman et al.,

Determination of effective atomic numbers and electron densities from mass attenuation coefficients for some selected complexes containing lanthanides

Can. J. Phys95(10), 1005-1011 (2017).doi: 10.1139/cjp-2016-0811
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. RSICC computer code collection. MCNPX user’s manual version 2.4.0. Monte Carlo n-particle transport code system for multiple and high energy applications, 2002.
23. H.O. Tekin,

MCNP-X Monte Carlo Code application for mass attenuation coefficients of concrete at different energies by modeling 3X3inch NaI(Tl) detector and comparison with XCOM and Monte Carlo Data

. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2016, (2016).doi: 10.1155/2016/6547318
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. I. Akkurt, H.O. Tekin, A. Mesbahi,

Calculation of detection efficiency for the gamma detector using MCNPX

. Acta Phys. Pol. A. 128, 332-334 (2015).doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-332
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. V.P. Singh, S.P. Shirmardi, M.E. Medhat et al.,

Determination of mass attenuation coefficient for some polymers using Monte Carlo simulation

. Vacuum 119, 284-288 (2015).doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.06.006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. A.M. El-Khayatt, A.M. Ali, V.P. Singh,

Photon attenuation coefficients of heavy-metal oxide glasses by MCNP code, XCOM program and experimental data: A comparison study

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A735, 207-212 (2014).doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2013.09.027
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. H.O. Tekin, V.P. Singh, T. Manici,

Effects of micro-sized and nano-sized WO3 on mass attenauation coefficients of concrete by using MCNPX code

. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes.121, 122-125 (2017).doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.12.040
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. A. Mesbahi, H. Ghiasi,

Shielding properties of the ordinary concrete loaded with micro- and nanoparticles against neutron and gamma radiations

. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes. 136, 27-31 (2018).doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.02.004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. H.O. Tekin, V.P. Singh, T. Manici et al.,

Validation of MCNPX with experimental results of mass attenuation coefficients for cement, gypsum and mixture

. J. Radiat. Prot. Res. 42, 154-157 (2017).doi: 10.14407/jrpr.2017.42.3.154
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30. M.G. Dong, R. El-Mallawany, M.I. Sayyed et al.,

Shielding properties of 80TeO2--5TiO2-(15-x)WO3--xAnOm glasses using WinXCom and MCNP5 code

. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 141, 172-178 (2017).doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.12.012
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31. G. Lakshminarayana, S.O. Baki, K.M. Kaky et al.,

Investigation of structural, thermal properties and shielding parameters for multicomponent borate glasses for gamma and neutron radiation shielding applications

. J. Non. Cryst. Solids.471, 222-237 (2017).doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.06.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32. H.O. Tekin, M.I. Sayyed, E.E. Altunsoy et al.,

Shielding properties and effects of WO3 and PbO on mass attenuation coefficients by using MCNPX code

. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 12, 861-867 (2017).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33. H.O. Tekin, M.I. Sayyed, T. Manici et al.,

Photon shielding characterizations of bismuth modified borate - silicate-tellurite glasses using MCNPX Monte Carlo code

. Mater. Chem. Phys.211, 9-16 (2018).doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.02.009
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34. M.I. Sayyed, H. Elhouichet,

Variation of energy absorption and exposure buildup factors with incident photon energy and penetration depth for boro-tellurite (B2O3-TeO2) glasses

. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 130, 335-342 (2017).doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.09.019
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35. M. Kurudirek,

Effective atomic numbers and electron densities of some human tissues and dosimetric materials for mean energies of various radiation sources relevant to radiotherapy and medical applications

. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 102, 139-146 (2014).doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.04.033
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar