1. Introduction
The China-ADS project ("Strategic Priority Research Program" of the Chinese Academy of Sciences) was launched in 2011 to pursue the R&D on key technologies towards a final demonstration facility on ADS with the capability of more than 1000 MW thermal power. The driver proton linear accelerator is defined to have 25 MeV energy, 10 mA current, and in CW operation mode. It employs superconducting structures except the Radio Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ) [1].
In 2014, the continuing 10 mA proton was accelerated to reach up to 2.1 MeV inside RFQ successfully in IMP, after that RF system has been updated few times for stable and secure operation. The original power source was a tetrode amplifier without circulator, which is a potential risk while the high intensity current beam passed the RF structure resulting in influencing its eigenfrequency. The newest RF system was constituted of two 80 kW solid-state amplifiers with many small circulators inserted in power modules for feeding power to a separate coupler (shown in Fig.1), and the frequency was stabilized through adjusting the temperature of the inlet water, whose operating scheme needs to be analyzed carefully by beam loading.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F001.jpg)
A new 80 kW solid-state amplifier from BBEF was installed and measured for the performance test, the power from four identical 22 kW cabinets was combined to the rating power of 80 kW. The amplifying link is presented in Fig.2.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F002.jpg)
For ADS project requirements, the cooling flow of hundreds of amplifiers would be excessive to be supplied if no optimization was conducted. Thus, all thermal optimization should be considered to improve the heat transfer on the power module. In fact, the Microwave Studio simulation aimed at a power module to focus on several thermal boundary’s configuration other than some specific heat transfer code such as Flotherm and HSC Chemistry. One important reason calculated by Microwave Studio was all simulation in it, which can switch conveniently between the electro-magnetic and multi-physics solvers based on the finite integral method. A special test bench was installed for RF characteristic and thermal measurements shown in Fig.3.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F003.jpg)
The layout of the cooling channel was considered according to the thermal requirements and fabrication cost. BLF188XR remains one of the most popular power transistors considering the rating power and frequency; the distribution of the cooling channel is shown in Fig.4 according to the thermal loss related to the operating status [2] and its location.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F004.jpg)
2. Thermal simulation background [3]
For thermal simulation, its theory and method were also deduced and verified in some books and journals; the journal [4] provides it in detail. A cooling water velocity v of 2.25 m/s (7.38 ft/s) in the inlet pipe, an estimation of the pressure drop gives a value of approximately 0.8 bar, the specific heat capacity [5] of water Cp = 4200 J/(kg
In addition, the viscosity u
Calculating the heat transfer coefficient h
The coaxial cooling channel has an equivalent radius r = 0.004 m, for a viscosity u = 0.9
For forced convection in a closed conduit the Nusselt number, Nu, is given by modified Dittus-Boelter equation for turbulent flow [10]:
With the thermal conductivity [11] of water k
The heat transfer coefficient [12] is given by:
thus, remembering that initial values on site allows h to be estimated easily from formulas as above, is 9490
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F005.jpg)
3. Thermal simulation
For thermal simulation in this example, the thermal parameters of different materials shown in Tab.1 were examined carefully for solver running, and especially for CST, the thermal boundaries were considered and set according to the simulation requirements; the different configurations may affect the final calculated value other than ANSYS code. In addition, it should be noted that the heat exchange comes from not only the cooling water but also air on the entire exposed surface of module structure.
Material | Thermal conductivity (W·K-1·m-1) | Heat capacity (kJ·K-1·kg-1) | Density (kg·m-3) |
---|---|---|---|
aluminum | 237.0 | 0.9 | 2700 |
copper | 401 | 0.39 | 8930 |
water | 0.6 | 4.2 | 1000 |
air | 0.026 | 1.005 | 1.204 |
The simulation results under this circumstance with CST thermal solver are presented in Fig.6. Some special parameter configuration was considered carefully because of software particularities. First, the thermal boundaries [14] were set to open add space and 0.1 distance factor from ambient according to the journal. Second, except the major heat exchange via water channels [15] in cooling plate, the heat transfer from surroundings cannot be easily ignored, which according to the experiences and examples, was approximately 20 on each and every face exposed in air. Finally, the only heat source was the power transistor, whose heat volume or density may be obtained from the output efficiency of LDMOS; when the maximum output power reaches up to 110 W, the dissipation power on the transistor would increase to approximately 400 W due to the low RF transfer efficiency.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F006.jpg)
A maximum temperature of 56.8 °C was observed on the power transistor without water cooling. Moreover, when we turn on the water valve, the temperature clearly decreases instantly, the experiment and simulated results are shown in Fig.7(a) and Fig.7(b), respectively, which indicates good agreement between the simulated value and the measurement.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F007.jpg)
4. Comparison between different thermal simulation codes
When 200 W output power was observed in the power meter, the conducting plate temperature is approximately 102 °C without water, but as the conducting plate is rigidly bolted to the cooling plate, where any thermal expansion will be observed predominately. This temperature gradient produces a maximum movement on the longer leg and is in the order of +0.2 mm in the 'Y’ axis i.e. vertically upwards. A full-scale power module is used as a test piece to verify the finite element model. Moreover, this real power module applies a measured heat load with 2.3 L/min running through the cooling channel. One thermocouple was used to monitor the surface temperature below the MOSFET.
The finite element software ANSYS [16] is used to check the exact conditions of the test and CST simulated results. Applying the same heat load to the finite element model and using the revised heat transfer coefficients [17] with a staggered bulk fluid, the RF heat has an extra temperature increasing, the two software have a good agreement in Fig.8, which shows temperatures of 56–116 °C from ANSYS within 12% of the simulated values from CST.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F008.jpg)
When water valve was turned on, the maximum temperature of heat plate drops to a more acceptable operational level. This temperature drop, by definition, decreases the distortion of the whole structure.
As a famous simulation code in the region of accelerator, ANSYS results were considered to be precise and reasonable. Fig.9 shows a good agreement between the two codes. A final note about CST simulation is that it indicates the configuration of complicated thermal boundaries and the heat exchange was verified according to the situation on site.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F009.jpg)
5. Cooling performance optimization
The experimental results show satisfactory agreement between the different codes and provide confidence in its use for further developments. Moreover, some new structures would apply to the higher cooling requirements, which focused on higher efficiency of heat transfer and exchange [18] on the location of special components, such as the power transistor and observed load. Fig.10 shows the multi-layer cooling channels concentrated on power transistor, and the temperature cloud map indicates that the better effect can be verified compared with the ordinary design of the cooling channels.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F010.jpg)
The fin-fan structure was more complicated and effective for cooling performance, which is shown in Fig.11. However, its fabrication is difficult and the cost would be high due to welding process and surface treatment process. Under the same heat load circumstance, the maximum temperature was lower than the non-fin structure.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F011.jpg)
6. Conclusion
According to the analysis and simulation results above, the optimization of cooling performance was conducted for higher heat transfer efficiency and lower operating temperature, which is shown in Fig.12. The goal of the accelerator facility in the future is a more robust design of the amplifier system, which can consider the balance of operating stability from amplifier and more economical cooling water supply, and new optimization design in micro-structure was tested through the welding and anti-corrosion process.
-201904/1001-8042-30-04-016/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-04-016-F012.jpg)
Moreover, from the fundamental design of the whole machine cooling on heat load in each and every power module, some professional-grade software tools can easily be applied for thermal simulation, such as CST (based on the finite integral method) and ANSYS (based on the finite element method). Due to the first-time simulation on cooling plate performance using them, the different simulated results were the excellent crosscheck for correctness. In addition, these professional codes can mutually switch between the microwave and multi-physics solvers for more precise and convenient simulation.
Finally, the cooling performance was improved through some special micro-channels, such as the fin-fan structure. Considering the design of water flow, the significant fluctuation of the transfer coefficient indicates the cooling optimization in structure achieving a desired or significant effect on the whole design range of water flow.
Conceptual physics design for the China-ADS LINAC
,BLF188XR; BLF188XRS (Product data sheet, 2013)
, http://ampleon.com. AccessedThermal design of an RFQ cell for the Radio Frequency Quadrupole under construction for ISIS
,Experimental analysis of heat transfer within the AP600 containment under postulated accident conditions
. Nucl. Eng. Des. 185(2), 153-172 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0029-5493(98)00232-5A comparative study of heat transfer coefficients for film condensation
. Energy Sci. Technol. 3(1), 1-9 (2012). Doi: 10.3968/j.est.1923847920120301.152Steam-film heat transfer coefficients for vertical tubes
. Ind. Eng. Chem. 26(4), 420-424 (1934). doi: 10.1021/ie50292a013Modeling of condensation heat transfer in a reactor containment
. Nucl. Eng. Des. 118(2), 193-212 (1990). doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(90)90057-5Simulation of heat transfer of supercritical water in obstacle-bearingg vertical tube
, Nucl. Sci. Tech, 2010, 21: 241-245. DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.21.241-245Adequacy of the heat-mass transfer analogy to simulate containment atmospheric cooling in the new generation of advanced nuclear reactors: experimental confirmation
. Nucl. Technol. 139(3), 221-232 (2002). Doi: 10.13182/NT02-A3315Condensation heat transfer in the presence of noncondensables, interfacial resistance, superheating, variable properties, and diffusion
. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 9(10), 1125-1144 (1966). doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(66)90035-4Heat transfer and temperature distribution in laminar film condensation
. Trans. Asme. 78, 1645-1648 (1956)Thermal boundary conditions in Multiphysics algorithm for semiconductor device simulation
, High Power Laser and Particle Beams (2016), doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.160129 (in Chinese)ANSYSTM Elements User's Manual
, https://www.yumpu.com/.../view/16905502/element-tables-ansys-users. AccessedHeat transfer analysis of bent cooling channels in SSRF light-blocked components
, Nucl. Sci. Tech, 2012, 23: 321-327. DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.23.321-327Pool boiling heat transfer enhancement on porous surface tube
, Nucl. Sci. Tech, 2011, 22: 122-128. DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.22.122-128