Searching for QCD critical point with light nuclei

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Searching for QCD critical point with light nuclei

Che Ming Ko
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.34, No.5Article number 80Published in print May 2023Available online 31 May 2023
18806

Density fluctuations and correlations due to a first-order quark-gluon plasma to hadronic matter phase transition and its critical end point, if they remain present after the hadronic evolution in a heavy ion collisions, can lead to an enhanced production of light nuclei in these collisions. This would then result in a non-monotonic collision energy dependence of the yield ratio NtNp/Nd2 of proton number Np, deuteron number Nd, and triton number Nt. Measurements of this yield ratio as a function of collision energy thus provides the possibility to probe the equation of state of strong-interaction matter and its phase diagram.

Video Abstract

Studying the properties of baryon-rich quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is the main focus of the beam energy scan (BES) experiments [1-3] at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) as well as at the future Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) and the Nuclotron-based Ion Collider Facility (NICA). There have been many theoretical studies on the QCD phase diagram and its structure, based on, for example, the lattice QCD [4], holographic models [5], and effective field theories [6]. Also, the QCD phase diagram has been explored in the hydrodynamic framework by the BEST Collaboration [7] and used in machine learning methods to study its effects in heavy ion collisions [8]. In particular, using the hydrodynamic [9-12] or transport [13] model with an equation of state that has a first-order partonic to hadronic matter phase transition, it has been shown that the produced matter in heavy ion collisions could be mechanically unstable due to the spinodal instability associated with the first-order phase transition. This would then lead to an amplification of the density inhomogeniety, and the resulting density fluctuations could enhance the production of composite particles, such as hadrons and nuclei, which can then be used as a signal of the first-order phase transition. For example, using a partonic transport model based on a three-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model [14, 15] for Au+Au collisions with the initial quark temperature and density in the spinodal region of the corresponding strong-interaction QCD phase diagram, it was shown in Ref. [13] that the quark density fluctuation after the evolution would be larger for the case with a first-order chiral phase transition than for the case without a first-order chiral phase transition in the equation of state. These results are illustrated in panels (b) and (a) of Fig. 1, respectively.

Fig. 1
(Color online) Density distribution of strongly interacting matter in a heavy ion collision after its expansion for the cases of crossover transition (panel (a)) and first-order chiral phase transition (panel (b)). Also shown for illustration of the latter case are deuterons and tritons produced from the density fluctuating hadronic matter and their yield ratio Opdt=NtNp/Nd2, which depends on the magnitude of neutron density distribution as discussed in the text.
pic

Also shown in Fig. 1 are the light nuclei produced from the the hadronic matter resulting from the clumping quark matter after hadronization and further evolution as well as their yield ratio Opdt=NtNp/Nd2, where Np, Nd, and Nt denote, respectively, the proton, deuteron, and triton numbers. According to Ref. [16], where the coalescence model [17-20] is used for light nuclei production, this yield ratio is related to the neutron relative density fluctuation Δn=(δn)2/n2, with n and (δn)2 being the average neutron density and its variance, respectively, by Opdt123(1+Δn). One thus expects an enhanced Opdt if the neutron density fluctuation remains present at the kinetic freeze-out of produced hadronic matter. A similar density fluctuation effect on the yield ratio Opdt also holds if deuteron and triton are produced thermally or statistically at the kinetic freeze out of the hadronic matter [21, 22]. It was further argued in Ref. [23] that the critical fluctuations in the vicinity of the critical end point (CEP) of a first-order phase transition could also lead to an enhancement of the yield ratio Opdt as shown in Ref. [24]. An enhanced Opdt has also been interpreted as a signal for the CEP according to Refs. [25, 26], which showed that light nuclei production would be enhanced as a result of their increased binding energies when the attractive part of nucleon-nucleon potential due to the σ meson exchange becomes deeper because of its decreasing mass as the system is close to the CEP. Reviews on this very interesting topic of the relation of light nuclei and the related topic of net baryon number fluctuations to the QCD phase transition can be found, respectively, in Ref. [27] and Refs. [28-30]. For a recent review on experimental study of the QCD phase diagram in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, it can be found in Ref. [31].

Recently, the STAR Collaboration has published in Physical Review Letters [34] the yield ratio Opdt from the data measured during the first phase of BES experiments. This result is based on the analysis led by Daniel Cebra, Matthew Harasty, Hui Liu, Xiaofeng Luo, Nu Xu, Ning Yu, and Dingwei Zhang. As shown in Fig. 2 for Au+Au collisions in the center-of-mass energy range of sNN=7.7200 GeV, this yield ratio is enhanced at 19.6 and 27 GeV in the most central collisions, although it shows a monotonic collision energy dependence. This result has been compared with theoretical predictions of the coalescence model for deuteron and triton production based on kinetically freeze-out protons and neutrons from microscopic models for relativistic heavy ion collisions. The latter include the hybrid model based on the (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamic model MUSIC for the quark-gluon plasma and the UrQMD transport model for the hadronic matter [32, 35] as well as a multiphase transport (AMPT) model that includes both the partonic and hadronic phases [33]. With a smooth crossover transition between the quark-gluon plasma and hadronic matter, an essentially collision energy independent Opdt is predicted by these models for both peripheral and central Au+Au collisions. There have been attempts to extend the study of Ref. [13] based on the NJL model for the quark matter to include its hadronization and the evolution of the resulting hadronic matter via the AMPT model [21, 36]. These studies have shown that the quark density fluctuation can largely survive hadronization but the hadron density fluctuation is somewhat washed out by their scatterings. The resulting yield ratio Opdt from the nucleon coalescence model based on kinetically freeze-out nucleons can, however, still be enhanced if the system goes through the spinodal region of the QCD phase diagram from the NJL model. Because of the low critical temperature and high baryon chemical potential in the NJL model, the enhanced Opdt only happens in central Au+Au collisions at center-of-mass energies lower than where the peak is seen in the STAR data. More realistic models for the QCD equation of state are thus needed in this transport model study. These equations of state can also be used in the MUSIC+UrQMD hybrid model to study the collision energy dependence of Opdt and to extract the critical temperature and baryon chemical potential from the STAR data.

Fig. 2
(Color online) Collision energy, pT dependence of the yield ratio NtNp/Nd2 in Au+Au collisions at RHIC for 0%-10% central (left panel) and 40%-80% peripheral (right panel) collisions. Dashed lines are the coalescence baselines obtained from the coalescence-inspired fit. Shaded areas denote the calculations from the MUSIC+UrQMD hybrid [32] and the AMPT [33] model. Taken from Ref. [34]
pic

Besides the yield ratio Opdt, there are other yield ratios of light nuclei that are also sensitive to nucleon density fluctuations and can be used to probe the QCD phase diagram. For example, the yield ratio NαNpN3HeNd2293(1+Δp) is sensitive to the proton density fluctuation Δ p [24] and also to the closeness to the critical point [37]. To avoid the smearing effect of hadronic scatterings on the nucleon density fluctuations and to directly probe the large density fluctuation during the quark to hadronic matter first-order phase transition, one can consider the yield ratio of hadrons, such as NpNK¯0Nπ+NΛ and NK+NΞNϕNΛ, which can be shown to be sensitive to the up quark and strange quark density fluctuations, respectively, if they are produced through quark coalescence [38, 39] and their numbers do not change during the hadronic evolution as in the statistical hadronization model [40, 41]. It is worthwhile to mention that in intermediate-energy nuclear collisions, density fluctuations of produced warm nucleonic matter can be used to study the nuclear liquid-gas phase transition [42] and light nuclei produced in these collisions can be employed to probe the density dependence of nuclear symmetry energy [43, 44], which has importance implications in both nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics.

References
[1] L. Adamczyk, et al.,

Energy Dependence of Moments of Net-proton Multiplicity Distributions at RHIC

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 032302 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.032302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] L. Adamczyk, et al.,

Beam energy dependence of moments of the net-charge multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at RHIC

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 092301 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.092301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] X. Luo, Q. Wang, N. Xu, et al. (Eds.), Properties of QCD Matter at High Baryon Density, (Springer, 2022). doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-4441-3
[4] H.T. Ding, S.T. Li, J.H. Liu,

Progress on qcd properties in strong magnetic fields from lattice qcd

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040008 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040008
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] Z.R. Zhu, Y.Q. Zhao, D.F. Hou,

Qcd phase structure from holographic models

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040007 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040007
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] Y.L. Du, C.M. Li, C. Shi, et al.,

Review of qcd phase diagram analysis using effective field theories

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040009 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040009
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] Y. Yin,

The best framework for exploring the qcd phase diagram: progress summary

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040010 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040010
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] F.P. Li, L.G. Pand, X.N. Wang,

Application of machine learning to the study of qcd transition in heavy ion collisions

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040014 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040014
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] J. Steinheimer, J. Randrup,

Spinodal amplification of density fluctuations in fluid-dynamical simulations of relativistic nuclear collisions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 212301 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.212301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] J. Steinheimer, J. Randrup,

Spinodal density enhancements in simulations of relativistic nuclear collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 87, 054903 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.054903
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] J. Steinheimer, J. Randrup, V. Koch,

Non-equilibrium phase transition in relativistic nuclear collisions: Importance of the equation of state

. Phys. Rev. C 89, 034901 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034901
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] C. Herold, M. Nahrgang, I. Mishustin, et al.,

Formation of droplets with high baryon density at the QCD phase transition in expanding matter

. Nucl. Phys. A 925, 14-24 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.01.010
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] F. Li, C.M. Ko,

Spinodal instabilities of baryon-rich quark matter in heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 95, 055203 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.055203
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] N.M. Bratovic, T. Hatsuda, W. Weise,

Role of Vector Interaction and Axial Anomaly in the PNJL Modeling of the QCD Phase Diagram

. Phys. Lett. B 719, 131-135 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.01.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] K. Xu, M. Huang,

Qcd critical end point and baryon number fluctuation

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040005 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] K.J. Sun, L.W. Chen, C.M. Ko, et al.,

Probing QCD critical fluctuations from light nuclei production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Lett. B 774, 103-107 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.056
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] S. Butler, C.A. Pearson,

Deuterons from High-Energy Proton Bombardment of Matter

. Phys. Rev. 129, 836-842 (1963). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.129.836
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] A. Schwarzschild, C. Zupancic,

Production of Tritons, Deuterons, Nucleons, and Mesons by 30-GeV Protons on A-1, Be, and Fe Targets

. Phys. Rev. 129, 854-862 (1963). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.129.854
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] R. Bond, P.J. Johansen, S.E. Koonin, et al.,

Breakup Densities of Nuclear Fireballs

. Phys. Lett. B 71, 43-47 (1977). doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(77)90735-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] H. Sato, K. Yazaki,

On the coalescence model for high-energy nuclear reactions

. Phys. Lett. B 98, 153-157 (1981). doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(81)90976-X
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] K.J. Sun, C.M. Ko, F. Li, et al.,

Enhanced yield ratio of light nuclei in heavy ion collisions with a first-order chiral phase transition

. Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 313 (2021). doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00607-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] L.L. Zhu, B. Wang, M. Wang, et al.,

Energy and centrality dependence of light nuclei production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Nuclear Science and Techniques 33, 45 (2022). doi: 10.1007/s41365-022-01028-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] K.J. Sun, L.W. Chen, C.M. Ko, et al.,

Light nuclei production as a probe of the QCD phase diagram

. Phys. Lett. B 781, 499-504 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.035
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] K.J. Sun, F. Li, C.M. Ko,

Effects of QCD critical point on light nuclei production

. Phys. Lett. B 816, 136258 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136258
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] E. Shuryak, J.M. Torres-Rincon,

Baryon clustering at the critical line and near the hypothetical critical point in heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 100, 024903 (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024903
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] E. Shuryak, J.M. Torres-Rincon,

Baryon preclustering at the freeze-out of heavy-ion collisions and light-nuclei production

. Phys. Rev. C 101, 034914 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034914
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[27] K.J. Sun, L.W. Chen, C.M. Ko, et al.,

Light nuclei production and qcd phase transition in heavy-ion collisions

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040012 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040012
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[28] Q. Chen, G.L. Ma, J.H. Chen,

Transport model study of conserved charge fluctuations and qcd phase transition in heavy-ion collisions

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040013 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040013
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[29] X. Luo, N. Xu,

Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC: An Overview

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 112 (2017). doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0257-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[30] S.J. Wu, H.C. Song,

Critical dynamical fluctuations near the qcd critical point

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040004 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[31] Y. Zhang, D.W. Zhang, X.F. Luo,

Experimental study of the qcd phase diagram in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040001 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[32] W. Zhao, C. Shen, C.M. Ko, et al.,

Beam-energy dependence of the production of light nuclei in Au + Au collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 102, 044912 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044912
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[33] K.J. Sun, C.M. Ko,

Light nuclei production in a multiphase transport model for relativistic heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 103, 064909 (2021). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.064909
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[34] M.I. Abdulhamid, et al.,

Beam Energy Dependence of Triton Production and Yield Ratio (Nt×Np/Nd2) in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 202301 (2023). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.202301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[35] W. Zhao, K.j. Sun, C.M. Ko, et al.,

Multiplicity scaling of light nuclei production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Lett. B 820, 136571 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136571
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[36] K.J. Sun, W.H. Zhou, L.W. Chen, et al.,

Spinodal Enhancement of Light Nuclei Yield Ratio in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

.. arXiv:2205.11010
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[37] E. Shuryak, J.M. Torres-Rincon,

Light-nuclei production and search for the QCD critical point

. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 241 (2020). doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00244-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[38] C.M. Ko,

Theoretical perspective on strangeness production

. EPJ Web Conf. 171, 03002 (2018). doi: 10.1051/epjconf/201817103002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[39] T. Shao, J. Chen, C.M. Ko, et al.,

Probing QCD critical fluctuations from the yield ratio of strange hadrons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Lett. B 801, 135177 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135177
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[40] A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel,

Hadron production in central nucleus?nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out

. Nucl. Phys. A 772, 167 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.03.012
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[41] J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, et al.,

Comparison of chemical freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 73, 034905 (2006). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.034905
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[42] C. Liu, X.G. Deng, Y.G. Ma,

Density fluctuations in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions

. Nuclear Science and Techniques 33, 52 (2022). doi: 10.1007/s41365-022-01040-y
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[43] L.W. Chen, C.M. Ko, B.A. Li,

Light cluster production in intermediate-energy heavy ion collisions induced by neutron rich nuclei

. Nucl. Phys. A 729, 809 (2003). doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.09.010
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[44] L.W. Chen, C.M. Ko, B.A. Li,

Light clusters production as a probe to the nuclear symmetry energy

. Phys. Rev. C 68, 017601 (2003). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.68.017601
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar