Hypernuclei as a laboratory to test hyperon-nucleon interactions

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Hypernuclei as a laboratory to test hyperon-nucleon interactions

Yu-Gang Ma
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.34, No.6Article number 97Published in print Jun 2023Available online 27 Jun 2023
27109

Video Abstract

Directed flow (v1) of the hypernuclei Λ3H and Λ4H have been observed in mid-central Au+Au collisions at sNN = 3 GeV 3 at RHIC. This measurement opens up a new possibility for studying hyperon-nucleon (Y-N) interaction under finite pressure. In addition, multi-strangeness hypernuclei provide a venue to probe hyperon-nucleon-nucleon (Y-N-N) and even hyperon-hyperon-nucleon (Y-Y-N) interactions. Hypernuclei are important for making connection between nuclear collisions and the equation of state which governs the inner structure of compact stars.

Hypernucleus, a bound state of hyperon(s) and nucleons, is a “laboratory” to study the hyperon-nucleon (Y-N) interactions. The strength of Y-N interaction is fundamentally important for understanding the nature of strong interaction. Based on simple kinematics, the theory predicts that the hyperon would exist in the interior of neutron star, which is the collapsed core of a massive star (around 10–25 solar mass), and has a typical mass of 1–2 solar mass and a radius of 10–12 km. However, the equation of state (EoS) with including strangeness were essentially excluded by the observations of massive neutron stars (e.g. PSR J0740-6620 [1]), due to that the presence of hyperons in the core of neutron star would soften the EoS. This inconsistency of theory and observations is the so-called "hyperon puzzle". To allow the existence of observed two-solar-mass neutron star with including hyperons, theory suggests that Y-N and Y-N-N interaction at high baryon density can create a stiffer EoS which can compensate the mentioned soften effect. Therefore, nuclear matter density dependent Y-N and Y-N-N interaction deduced experimentally is highly expected to the communities of nuclear physics and astrophysics.

High energy heavy-ion collision provides an effective tool to create hot dense nuclear matter [2, 3] which finally evolves to form various particles and rare nuclei in the laboratory [4-9], providing a venue to study the strong interaction [10-14]. Thermal model [15] and hadronic transport model with coalescence afterburner [16, 17] calculations have predicted abundant production of light hypernuclei in high-energy nuclear collisions, especially at high baryon density. Collective flow is driven by pressure gradients created in such collisions, which has been commonly used for studying the properties of nuclear matter created in collisions. Due to its genuine sensitivity to early collision dynamics [18-28], the first order coefficient of the Fourier-expansion of the azimuthal distribution in the momentum space, v1, also called the directed flow, has been analyzed for many particles species ranging from π-mesons to light nuclei for a long time [29-34], see a carton picture in Fig. 1. Hence, measurements of hypernuclei collective flow help to study the Y-N interactions in the QCD equation of state at high baryon density.

Fig. 1
(Color online) A carton for hypernuclei collective flow in high-energy heavy ion collisions.
pic

Now publishing in Physical Review Letters [35], the STAR Collaboration has reported the first observation of directed flow, v1, of Λ3H and Λ4H in center-of-mass energy sNN = 3 GeV 3 Au + Au collisions. The work was mainly contributed by a joint team of Institute of Modern Physics (IMP@CAS) and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, led by Xin Dong, Xionghong He, Chenlu Hu, Yuanjing Ji, Yue-Hang Leung, Nu Xu, Yapeng Zhang, and Fengyi Zhao.

The data were collected by the STAR experiment at Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) with the fixed-target (FXT) setup in 2018. A gold beam of energy at 3.85A GeV is bombarded on a gold target of thickness 1% interaction length. After colliding vertex selection, a total of 2.6×108 minimum bias (MB) events are used for this analysis. Λ3H is reconstructed via both two-body and three-body decays Λ3H3He+π and Λ3Hd+p+π while Λ4H is reconstructed via the two-body decay channel, Λ4H4He+π. For this analysis, a relatively wide centrality range, 5–40%, is selected where both the event plane resolution and the yields of hypernuclei are maximized.

The Time-Projection Chamber (TPC) [36] is the main sub-detector for identifying above decay daughters, which is the main tracking detector in STAR, is 4.2 m long and 4 m in diameter, positioned inside a 0.5 T solenoidal magnetic field along the beam direction. Charged particles, including π-, p, d, 3He and 4He, are selected based on the ionization energy loss (dE/dx) measured in the TPC as a function of rigidity (p/|q|), where p and q are the momentum and charge of the particle. In order to ensure high track quality, the number of TPC points used in the track fitting are required to be larger than 15 (out of a maximum of 45). Λ, Λ3H and Λ4H were reconstructed using the KFParticle package based on a Kalman filter method [37, 38].

Signal candidates of Λ, Λ3H and Λ4H were obtained via their invariant mass distributions reconstructed from decay daughters. The directed flow of Λ, Λ3H and Λ4H are extracted with the event plane method [39]. In transverse momentum (pt) interval of 0.4<pt/A<0.8 GeV/c (hypernucleus is very close to this pt interval due to the statistical reason), Λ, Λ3H and Λ4H v1 as a function of rapidity (y) is obtained from 5–40% mid-central Au + Au collisions at sNN = 3 GeV 3. In the Ref. [35], the v1(y) of p, d, t, 3He and 4He from the same data are also analyzed in the pt interval of 0.4<pt/A<0.8 GeV/c. Due to limited statistics, the v1(y) distributions of hypernuclei are fitted with a linear function v1(y) = a·y, in the rapidity range -1.0<y<0.0. v1(y) of Λ, p, d, t, 3He and 4He are fitted with a third-order polynomial function v1(y) = a·y+b·y3 in the rapidity regions, where a stands for the mid-rapidity slope dv1/dy|y=0, and b are fitting parameters.

The mid-rapidity slopes dv1/dy for Λ, Λ3H and Λ4H as a function of particle mass are shown in Fig. 2. In same 5–40% data, v1 slopes of p, d, t, 3He and 4He are presented by open circles. The slopes dv1/dy of hypernuclei are all systematically lower than these of nuclei with the same mass number. Linear fits are performed on the mass dependence of dv1/dy for both light nuclei and hypernuclei. The obtained slope parameters are 0.3323 ± 0.0003 for light nuclei and 0.27 ± 0.04 for hypernuclei, respectively. Two transport models (JAM and UrQMD) plus coalescence afterburner calculations are in agreement with data within uncertainties. These observations suggest that coalescence of nucleons and hyperon Λ could be the dominant mechanism for the hypernuclei Λ3H and Λ4H production in the 3 GeV collisions.

Fig. 2
(Color online) Mass dependence of the mid-rapidity v1 slope, dv1/dy, for Λ, Λ3H and Λ4H from the sNN = 3 GeV 3 5–40% mid-central Au+Au collisions. Transport models (JAM model and UrQMD model) plus coalescence afterburner can describe the data. The figure is taken from Ref. [40].
pic

With the uncertainties, it is seems that the mass dependence of the hypernuclei v1 slope is similar to that of light nuclei although it may not necessarily be so due to the differences in N-N and Y-N interactions. In future, precision data on hypernuclei collectivity will yield invaluable insights on in-medium Y-N interaction. This work opens up a new direction for studying Y-N interaction under finite pressure [41]. This is important for making connection between heavy-ion collisions and the equation of state which governs the inner structure of compact stars. The excitation function of hypernuclei collective flow would provide valuable information for understanding in-medium Y-N interactions, which can be achieved in STAR BES-II program in future.

Last but not least, it is worthy to mention that the production of multi-strangeness hypernuclei is another important probe to understand Y-N as well as Y-Y interactions. In a recent work on multi-strangeness hypernuclei production by Zhang et al. [42], nucleon and Ω which has triple strange quarks, are coalesced into Ω NN and ΩΩ N based on the phase-space information generated by the blast-wave model. It is found that with the growing of constituent baryon number, e.g. ΩNΩNNΩ as well as NNΩΩΩN, the production rates appear to follow the exponential function exp(cA) where c is the reduction factor. This kind of baryon number dependent trend is similar to that for light nuclei of pdt (Λ3H) in Fig. 3. In general, two classes for these production chains are observed. One is for Ndt (Λ3H), ΩNΩNNΩ and ΩΩNΩΩ (solid lines). Another is for NNΩNΩΩ, ΩΩΩ and dNNΩ chains (dash lines). The fact that much larger reduction of dN/dy for the second class than the first class illustrates that much less yield for adding one more Ω than one more nucleon, which mainly results from the different interactions between N-Ω and Ω-Ω. Thus, the production of hypernuclei could provide another method to understand the hyperons and nucleons interactions. Interestingly, different magnitude and slopes for baryon number dependence of hypernuclei production [42] as well as mid-rapidity v1 slope between light nuclei and hypernuclei [35] are exhibited, demonstrating rich information on N-N, Y-N and Y-Y-N interactions. Overall, systematic studies on hypernuclei will build a connection between nuclear collisions and the equation of state which governs the inner structure of compact stars.

Fig. 3
(Color online) The exponential decay relation of dN/dy versus the constituent mass number (A) for Pb + Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV. There are basically two-class production chains, i.e. the one is: Ndt (Λ3H) (red), ΩNΩNNΩ (blue), ΩΩNΩΩ (pink), and the another is: NNΩNΩΩ (green), ΩΩΩ (brown) and dNΩNNNΩΩ (violet). Lines show the exponential decay fits. The figure is adapted from Ref. [42].
pic
References
1. H.T. Cromartie, et al.,

Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar

. Nature Astron. 4, 72-76 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. Y. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Luo,

Experimental study of the qcd phase diagram in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040001 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. K. Sun, L. Chen, C.M. Ko, et al.,

Light nuclei production and qcd phase transition in heavy-ion collisions

. Nuclear Techniques (in Chinese) 46, 040012 (2023). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040012
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. B.I. Abelev, et al.,

Observation of an antimatter hypernucleus

. Science 328, 58 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1183980
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. H. Agakishiev, et al.,

Observation of the antimatter helium-4 nucleus

. Nature 473, 353 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nature10079
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. J. Adam, et al.,

Measurement of the mass difference and the binding energy of the hypertriton and antihypertriton

. Nature Physics 16, 409 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41567-020-0799-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. J. Chen, D. Keane, Y.G. Ma, et al.,

Antinuclei in heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Rep. 760, 1 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.07.002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. M. Abdulhamid, B. Aboona, J. Adam, et al.,

Beam energy dependence of triton production and yield ratio (Nt×Np/Nd2)

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 202301 (2023). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.202301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. C.M. Ko,

Searching for qcd critical point with light nuclei

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 80 (2023). doi: 10.1007/s41365-023-01231-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. L. Adamczyk, et al.,

Measurement of interaction between antiprotons

. Nature 527, 345 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nature15724
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. S. Acharya, et al.,

Unveiling the strong interaction among hadrons at the lhc

. Nature 588, 232 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-3001-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. M.S. Abdallah, et al.,

Pattern of global spin alignment of φ and k*0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions

. Nature 614, 244 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05557-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. X.N. Wang,

Vector meson spin alignment by the strong force field

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 15 (2023). doi: 10.1007/s41365-023-01166-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. J. Chen, Z.T. Liang, Y.G. Ma, et al.,

Global spin alignment of vector mesons and strong force fields in heavy- ion collisions

. Science Bulletin 68, 874 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.04.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, et al.,

Production of light nuclei, hypernuclei and their antiparticles in relativistic nuclear collisions

. Phys. Lett. B 697, 203-207 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.01.053
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. J. Steinheimer, et al.,

Hypernuclei, dibaryon and antinuclei production in high energy heavy ion collisions: Thermal production versus Coalescence

. Phys. Lett. B 714, 85-91 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.069
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. J. Aichelin, et al.,

Parton-hadron-quantum-molecular dynamics: A novel microscopic n-body transport approach for heavy-ion collisions, dynamical cluster formation, and hypernuclei production

. Phys. Rev. C 101, 044905 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044905
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. C.M. Hung, E.V. Shuryak,

Hydrodynamics near the QCD phase transition: Looking for the longest lived fireball

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4003-4006 (1995). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. J. Brachmann, et al.,

Antiflow of nucleons at the softest point of the EoS

. Phys. Rev. C 61, 024909 (2000). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.61.024909
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. J. Steinheimer, J. Auvinen, H. Petersen, et al.,

Examination of directed flow as a signal for a phase transition in relativistic nuclear collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 89, 054913 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.054913
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. Y. Nara, H. Niemi, A. Ohnishi, et al.,

Examination of directed flow as a signature of the softest point of the equation of state in QCD matter

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 034906 (2016). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034906
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. T.Z. Yan, Y. Ma, X. Cai, et al.,

Scaling of anisotropic flow and momentum-space densities for light particles in intermediate energy heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Lett. B 638, 50 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.05.018
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. C.Z. Shi, Y.G. Ma,

alpha-clustering effect on flows of direct photons in heavy-ion collisions

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 66 (2021). doi: 10.1007/s41365-021-00897-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. J.H. Chen, Y.G. Ma, G.L. Ma, et al.,

Elliptic flow of φ meson and strange quark collectivity at rhic

. Phys. Rev. C 74, 064902 (2006). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.064902
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. H. Wang, J.H. Chen,

Anisotropy flows in pb-pb collisions at lhc energies from parton scatterings with heavy quark trigger

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 15 (2022). doi: 10.1007/s41365-022-00999-y
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. L.X. Han, G.L. Ma, Y.G. Ma, et al.,

Initial fluctuation effect on harmonic flows in high-energy heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 84, 064907 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.064907
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. S.W. Lan, S. Shu-Su,

Anisotropic flow in high baryon density region

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 21 (2022). doi: 10.1007/s41365-022-01006-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. M. Wang, J.Q. Tao, H. Zheng, et al.,

Number-of-constituent-quark scaling of elliptic flow: a quantitative study

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 37 (2022). doi: 10.1007/s41365-022-01019-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. L. Adamczyk, et al.,

Beam-Energy Dependence of the Directed Flow of Protons, Antiprotons, and Pions in Au+Au Collisions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 162301 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.162301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30. L. Adamczyk, et al.,

Beam-Energy Dependence of Directed Flow of Λ, Λ¯, K±, Ks0 and φ in Au+Au Collisions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 062301 (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.062301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31. J. Adam, et al.,

Beam-energy dependence of the directed flow of deuterons in Au+Au collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 102, 044906 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044906
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32. L. Adamczyk, et al.,

Elliptic flow of identified hadrons in Au+Au collisions at sNN= 7.7-62.4

GeV. Phys. Rev. C 88, 014902 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.014902
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33. J. Adam, et al.,

Flow and interferometry results from Au+Au collisions at sNN=4.5

GeV. Phys. Rev. C 103, 034908 (2021). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.034908
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34. A. Bzdak, et al.,

Mapping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan

. Phys. Rept. 853, 1-87 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.01.005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35. B.E. Aboona, et al.,

Observation of Directed Flow of Hypernuclei ∧3H and ∧3H in sNN=3 GeV Au+Au Collisions at RHIC

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 212301 (2023). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.212301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36. M. Anderson, et al.,

The Star time projection chamber: A Unique tool for studying high multiplicity events at RHIC

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499, 659-678 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01964-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37. I. Kisel,

Event Topology Reconstruction in the CBM Experiment

. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1070, 012015 (2018). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1070/1/012015
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
38. M. Zyzak,

Online selection of short-lived particles on many-core computer architectures in the CBM experiment at FAIR

. Ph.D. thesis, Frankfurt U. (2016)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
39. H. Masui, A. Schmah, A.M. Poskanzer,

Event plane resolution correction for azimuthal anisotropy in wide centrality bins

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 833, 181-185 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.07.037
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
40. B.E. Aboona, et al.,

Observation of Directed Flow of Hypernuclei ∧3H and ∧4H in sNN = 3 GeV 3 Au+Au Collisions at RHIC

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 212301 (2023). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.212301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
41. T. Neidig, K. Gallmeister, C. Greiner, et al.,

Towards solving the puzzle of high temperature light (anti)-nuclei production in ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Lett. B 827, 136891 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136891
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
42. L. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y.G. Ma,

Production of ΩNN and ΩΩN in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 416 (2022). doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10336-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar