logo

Delocalization in the hot deformed hypernucleus Λ21Ne

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Delocalization in the hot deformed hypernucleus

Xin Li
Chao-Feng Chen
Qi-Bo Chen
Xian-Rong Zhou
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.37, No.3Article number 56Published in print Mar 2026Available online 23 Jan 2026
2000

We investigate the effects of temperature on the structural evolution and clustering in the hypernucleus, taking as an example, in the framework of deformed finite-temperature Skyrme-Hartree-Fock. The SkI4 Skyrme force is employed for nucleon-nucleon interaction, while the NSC97f force is used for the hyperon-nucleon interaction. It is found that the system exhibits a strongly deformed ground state with pronounced α-cluster correlations and localized density distributions at low temperatures. As temperature increases, nuclear deformation weakens, the nuclear density spreads over the surface, and clustering gradually diminishes and vanishes entirely at . This is due to that the thermal excitations lower the Fermi surface and enhance single-particle level splitting. In particular, owing to the lower excitation threshold of hyperons in the hypernuclear system, the hyperon radii exhibit a stronger temperature dependence than the nucleons. We further analyze the temperature-dependent changes in deformation, single-Λ binding energy, and entropy, providing new insights into the thermal evolution of the hypernuclear structure.

Finite temperatureCluster structureHypernucleusSkyrme-Hartree-Fock
1

Introduction

Hypernuclei are nuclear many-body systems that contain one or more bound hyperons within ordinary nuclei. Since the experimental discovery of the first hypernucleus in 1952 [1], different types of hyperons, such as Λ, ∑+,0,-, and Ξ0,-, have been identified. Unlike nucleons, a hyperon is not subject to the Pauli exclusion principle within the nucleus, allowing it to penetrate deeply into the center of a nuclear core. This unique property enables a hyperon to serve as a valuable probe for investigating nuclear properties that are otherwise inaccessible through conventional methods. The addition of a hyperon to the nucleus as an impurity has been shown to have significant effects on various aspects, including the modification of deformation [2-4], size [5, 6], and drip lines [7, 8]. Hypernuclei also provide an essential platform for testing hyperon-nucleon (YN) and hyperon-hyperon (YY) interactions, which are crucial for understanding the properties of multi-strange systems and their astrophysical applications [9-12].

Hyperons are believed to be abundantly present in the dense inner regions of neutron stars, where extreme temperature and density conditions prevail [13-15]. Experimentally, hyperons and hypernuclei are typically produced through high-energy beam collisions. Relativistic heavy ion collisions offer a distinctive methodology for generating hypernuclei and investigating nuclear matter under severe conditions characterized by elevated temperatures and densities. These processes facilitate the production of hypernuclei across a spectrum of sizes and isospin compositions, as the hyperons synthesized in these reactions are subsequently captured by either nucleons or nuclear fragments [16-18]. Recent experimental collaborations, including STAR [19, 20], ALICE [21, 22], and HypHI [23], have provided significant insights into hypernuclear production mechanisms, with additional measurements in plan. Furthermore, experimental facilities such as PANDA [24], CBM [25], WASA@Super-FRS at FAIR [26], BM@N, MPD at NICA [27], and HFRS at HIAF [28] aim to further explore hypernuclear properties through relativistic particle-induced reactions [29]. Temperature plays a crucial role in the production of hypernuclei, as the short-lived nature of hypernuclei makes their formation highly temperature-dependent [30, 31]. Understanding the effects of temperature on hypernuclear properties is essential not only for interpreting experimental results but also for gaining insights into the behavior of hot nuclear matter, which has implications for astrophysical environments such as supernovae and neutron star mergers [32-35].

In recent years, several studies have investigated the properties of hypernuclei under finite-temperature conditions. For example, a study based on the relativistic Thomas-Fermi approach demonstrated that as the temperature increases, the radii of Λ hyperons expand more rapidly than those of nucleons, because it is easier to excite a small number of hyperons than to excite a large number of nucleons [36]. Furthermore, the finite-temperature Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (FT-HFB) framework has been applied to investigate the interplay between temperature and pairing correlations in multi-Λ hypernuclei, such as Ca, Sn, and Pb. The results reveal a critical temperature in agreement with the BCS prediction, as well as the emergence of a pairing re-entrance phenomenon in the hyperon drip-line hypernucleus [37].

The aforementioned studies have highlighted the impact of temperature on the hypernuclear structure, including modifications to the nuclear density distributions, which may influence nucleon localization and clustering behavior. For instance, clustering in nuclear matter, is generally expected to occur under low-density and low-temperature conditions. Previous studies have focused primarily on the temperature effects on the clustering of nucleons in nuclear matter [38-42] and finite nuclei [43, 44]. Additionally, several investigations using both relativistic and non-relativistic nuclear energy density functionals have been conducted to understand the nuclear properties when the temperature increases [45-48]. While clustering in light nuclei at zero and finite temperatures has been extensively investigated, the effects of temperature on the localization and clustering in hypernuclei remain unknown. The presence of a hyperon introduces additional degrees of freedom and modifies nucleonic correlations, potentially affecting the formation and dissolution of clusters during thermal excitation. Gaining insight into these effects is important for a more comprehensive understanding of hypernuclear matter, particularly under thermal conditions relevant to astrophysical environments.

Over the past few decades, the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock (SHF) model has been widely and successfully applied to investigate normal nuclear structures (see, for example, Refs. [49-51]) and has also been extended to hypernuclear systems [52-59]. The clustering phenomenon in light stable and exotic nuclei has been explored within the SHF approach in Refs. [60-63].

This study aims to investigate the effects of temperature on the localization and clustering features of hypernuclei using the finite temperature SHF model, offering new insights into their structure and interactions under extreme conditions. 20Ne is a well-known nucleus characterized by a strong intrinsic quadrupole deformation and pronounced localization in its intrinsic densities [64-67]. To investigate the effect of temperature on clustering in hypernuclei, we selected 20Ne as the core nucleus.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, the formalism of the finite-temperature SHF approach is introduced. The numerical details are presented in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, we discuss the results of the binding energy, mean-field potentials, and density distributions in detail. Finally, a summary is given in Sect. 5.

2

Theoretical framework

Our calculations were performed using the self-consistent SHF model, which was extended to the theoretical description of hypernuclei in Refs. [54, 55, 68-70]. In this approach, the total energy of a hypernucleus can be written as [50]pic(1)Here, ε is an energy density functional contributed by the nucleons εN and hyperon pic(2)They depend on the one-body density ρq, kinetic density τq, and spin-orbit current Jq aspic(3) are the self-consistently calculated single-particle (s.p.) wave functions of the Nq occupied states for the different particles q=n, p, Λ in a hypernucleus.

In the extension of the SHF model to the finite temperature case, one merely replaces the occupation factor by a thermal Fermi distribution [71, 72]pic(4)at a given temperature T, where kB is the Boltzmann constant.

The energy density functional εN represents the conventional nucleon-nucleon interaction [49]. The corresponding single-particle potential for neutrons or protons, VN, can be expressed as:pic(5)where arises from the Skyrme-type NN interaction [73], and denotes the additional contribution from interaction. The is the hyperon-nucleon part and parameterized as (densities ρ given in units of fm-3, energy density ε in MeV fm -3) [74, 75]:pic(6)together with Λ effective-mass pic(7)the parameter εi in Eq. (6) and μi in Eq. (7) were obtained by performing Brueckner-Hartree-Fock calculations on hypernuclear bulk matter with the Nijmegen potential NSC97f [53].

Correspondingly, one obtains the SHF mean-fieldspic(8)pic(9)Through the variation of the total energy in Eq. (1) one derives the SHF Schrödinger equation for both nucleons and Λ hyperon,pic(10)In the above formula, is the spin-orbit interaction part for the nucleons, as given in Refs. [49, 50]. The is the central part and is corrected by the effective-mass term in Eq. (7).

By solving the Schrödinger equation, we can obtain the wave functions and single-particle energies for the different single-particle levels k and species q. The standard nucleonic Skyrme force SkI4 [76] is applied in this study, but the results of the hyperonic observable are not sensitive to the choice of nucleonic force parameters [77].

Because the candidate core nuclei in this study are deformed, it is necessary to use the deformed SHF calculation. In the current work, axial symmetry is assumed for the SHF deformed potentials, and the Schrödinger equation is solved in cylindrical coordinates (r, z) [49, 50, 73]. The geometric quadrupole deformation parameter of the nuclear core is calculated aspic(11)In the calculations, the quadrupole deformation β2 spans the [-0.2, 0.8] interval with steps of 0.02 to generate the potential energy surfaces.

In a nucleus or hypernucleus, the free energy is calculated bypic(12)where is the total energy of the system for a given deformation parameter β2 and temperature T. The is the entropy and defined as [45]pic(13)where fk is given by Eq. (4).

The relevant finite-temperature properties can be calculated from the lowest state on the free energy surface, characterized by a quadrupole deformation at a given temperature T. The P(β2, T) is a mathematical expression for the probability that a system in equilibrium to obtain a deformed configuration with a quadrupole parameter β2 at finite temperature [78]pic(14)Here, is the free energy difference between a given deformation and temperature state and the lowest free energy statepic(15)In the theoretical modeling of nuclei and hypernuclei at finite temperatures, both statistical and quantum fluctuations must be considered. Quantum fluctuations are particularly significant for light nuclei and at low temperatures (T < 1 MeV), but play a minor role for nuclei with a sharp minimum in their free energy surface [79, 80]. In mesoscopic systems, such as finite nuclei and hypernuclei, statistical fluctuations around the minimum free energy are expected to make a notable contribution at finite temperatures. Therefore, in this study, we focused solely on statistical fluctuations in our calculations. To account for these effects, the thermal average of an observable is obtained by mixing the expectation values at various deformations β2 using the ensemble average [43, 81]:pic(16)

3

Numerical details

In this study, the properties of hot Λ hypernucleus are investigated within the framework of the finite-temperature SHF model. For the nucleon-nucleon (NN) interaction, the Skyrme force SkI4 is employed, which provides an excellent overall fit to the ground-state properties of nuclei ranging from 16O to 208Pb, as well as the isotope shifts in Ca and Pb isotopes [76]. For hyperon-nucleon YN interaction, microscopic Nijmegen interaction NSC97f [53] is employed, which derived from Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (BHF) calculation of hypernuclear matter. It was successfully applied to calculate the ground state properties of single- and multi-Λ hypernuclei [55, 63].

Pairing effects are often considered to play an important role in some nuclear phenomena. To quantify the effect of pairing correlations on the density distribution, we performed additional calculations for at T=0 MeV using a density-dependent δ pairing interaction in the BCS approximation. The interaction strength for nucleons was taken as , 300, 600, and 900 MeV·fm3, respectively. Figure 1 demonstrates that the nuclear density distributions of exhibit negligible variations (Δρ/ρmax < 0.2%) across all pairing strengths. Moreover, from a theoretical perspective, the omission of pairing correlations is supported by two considerations. First, the ground state of 20Ne features a relatively large single-particle energy gap near the Fermi surface, which suppresses the pairing correlations at zero temperature. Second, at finite temperature, thermal excitations weaken pairing correlations, leading to the collapse of the pairing gap beyond a critical temperature of approximately MeV [82, 83]. These observations suggest that the pairing effects are negligible within the temperature regime of interest. Therefore, it is justifiable to exclude pairing correlations in this study, as it simplifies the calculations while allowing us to focus on the temperature effects on the clustering behavior.

Fig. 1
(Color online) The neutron density distributions for at zero temperature with varying pairing strengths. The four panels correspond to pairing strengths of 0, 300, 600, and 900 MeV·fm3, respectively
pic
4

Results and discussion

Figure 2 presents the free energy surfaces and probability factors as functions of deformation at finite temperatures. The probability factor, as defined by Eq. (15), is determined by the free energy and temperature with .

Fig. 2
(Color online) Relative free energies ΔF(β2, T) (lower panel) and the corresponding probability factors (upper panel) as functions of quadrupole deformation parameter β2 at finite temperatures T=0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.25, 2.5, and 2.8 MeV for
pic

At T = 0.1 MeV, the free energy surface exhibits a well-defined minimum around β2 = 0.60, corresponding to a probability factor of 1. This indicates a stable configuration characterized by a robust quadrupole deformation and well-defined clustering.

As the temperature increases from 0.1 to 2.8 MeV, thermal excitations enhance the probability of populating a wider range of deformed states, reducing the dominance of the minimum. Concurrently, the free energy surface flattens, leading to an increase in the contribution of other states to the thermal average of observables, as evidenced by the changes in the probability factors. This behavior reflects the gradual weakening of the spatial localization and clustering in .

As the temperature increases, the hypernuclear system gradually reduces its tendency for strong quadrupole deformation, which is observed at lower temperatures. The nuclear shape transitions to a more symmetric configuration, resulting in the dissolution of the clustering structures. This highlights the strong thermal sensitivity of clusters.

To analyze the effect of thermal shape fluctuations at a finite temperature, we evaluate the thermal average of the quadrupole deformation parameter using Eq. (16), as shown in Fig. 3. As expected, once thermal fluctuations are included, the sharp shape phase transition is smoothed out, and the decrease in β2 becomes more gradual with increasing temperature. Although the average deformation remains small, it does not vanish even at T = 3.0 MeV, indicating that thermal fluctuations effectively wash out abrupt structural transitions.

Fig. 3
(Color online) The evolution of the quadrupole deformation parameter β2 with temperature. The most probable values (circles) correspond to the deformation at the free energy minimum, while the thermal average values (squares) are calculated using the constrained FT-SHF results at finite temperatures according to Eq. (16)
pic

We further studied the changes in the localization properties and behavior of the α clusters in with increasing temperature. Figure 4 presents the density distributions of the Λ hyperon (left panels) and neutrons (middle panels) in at different temperatures. Both hyperon and neutron density distributions show reduced deformation with increasing temperature, transitioning from prolate at T = 0.1 MeV to spherical at T = 2.8 MeV. The reduction in deformation primarily results from the depopulation of deformation-driven states and the vanishing of shell effects at elevated temperatures [84]. It should be emphasized that the results presented in Fig. 4 are obtained from the configurations corresponding to the free energy minima at each temperature. Consequently, thermal shape fluctuations were not explicitly incorporated into these plots. This approach allows for a clearer visualization of the intrinsic clustering features and the gradual reduction of deformation with increasing temperature. In contrast, performing thermal averaging over deformed configurations obscures fine structural details, complicating the analysis of temperature-induced modifications to the cluster structure, which is the primary focus of this section.

Fig. 4
(Color online) The density distributions of hyperon (left panels) and neutron (middle panels) as well as the neutron localization function (right panels) for at finite temperatures T=0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 2.8 MeV, respectively
pic

The deformation of both nuclei and hypernuclei is generally determined by the single-particle energy levels occupied by nucleons that are close to the Fermi surface. The energy density functional method provides an understanding of this phenomenon by utilizing nucleon density distributions. However, the nucleon density distribution is the result of the accumulation of all occupied single-particle energy levels; thus, it loses much more detailed information.

In this study, we employed the localization function, which incorporates contributions from the kinetic energy, density, and current density, to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the nuclear localization structure [6, 85, 86]. It can be written as the probability of finding the second particle located within a shell of small radius around the assumed particle at r with the same spin σ (↑ and ↓) and isospin q (=n, p, or Λ) [60]pic(17)where the kinetic energy density , particle density and current density are given by Eq. (3). The localization function provides a dimensioness and normalized measure of nucleon localization. For light even-even nuclei, the localization distributions of protons () and neutrons (), as well as spin-up () and spin-down () states, exhibit considerable similarity owing to the small Coulomb interaction and fully occupied single-particle energy levels [60]. Consequently, a singular parameter, (), adequately describes all previously mentioned parameters including (), (), (), and ().

Owing to the above convenience, the current study utilizes the localization distribution of spin-up neutrons () as the nucleon localization distribution to investigate the structure of localized clusters in . The neutron localization function of is displayed in the right panel of Fig. 4 at various temperatures. When the nucleon localization is close to 1, α-like clusters (a pure overlap of four nucleon wave functions) are expected because of spin and isospin degeneracy. Compared to the density profiles, the localization function typically displays a larger spatial extension because of the kinetic term included in the calculation.

At low temperatures, the localization function predicts highly localized regions at the outer ends, and the α clusters are clearly visible for . The localization feature is also obtained around the center, which is associated with 12C. Therefore, this pattern is interpreted as α-12C-α quasimolecular configuration [87]. The cluster structures remain robust up to T = 1.0 MeV. Beyond this temperature, thermal excitations induce nucleon delocalization, resulting in the gradual suppression of clustering signatures. As the temperature increased further, enhanced thermal fluctuations led to the progressive dissolution of the cluster structures. Ultimately, the clustering effects vanish before the nucleus undergoes a shape phase transition at T = 2.8 MeV. These findings are in agreement with the results obtained from the total intrinsic density distributions shown in the middle panels of Fig. 4, providing further insights into the thermal evolution of nuclear clustering phenomena.

As the temperature increases, the clustering in hypernuclei gradually weakens and eventually disappears. This phenomenon is closely linked to the thermal evolution of single-particle energy levels. To investigate these thermal effects, Fig. 5 presents the Nilsson single-particle level diagram for neutrons.

Fig. 5
(Color online) The neutron Nilsson single-particle level diagram (solid lines) as functions of quadrupole deformation β2 at finite temperatures T=0.1, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 2.8 MeV. The Fermi surface is indicated by the dotted curves
pic

First of all, Fig. 5 shows that as the temperature increases, the Fermi surface shifts downward. This shift occurs because thermal excitation promotes more nucleons to higher energy states, and to conserve the total particle number, the Fermi level must decrease to compensate for the increased occupation of high-energy levels. The Fermi-Dirac distribution further modifies the occupation probabilities near the Fermi surface.

Second, in deformed nuclei, the 1d5/2 orbit is split into multiple energy states owing to the combined effects of the deformation potential and spin-orbit interaction. As the temperature increases, nucleons become increasingly excited for higher angular momentum orbitals, leading to an enhancement of the spin-orbit coupling. This, in turn, amplifies the energy separation between split states. The effect is particularly evident in the pronounced energy gap between the [202 5/2] and [211 1/2] orbitals at small deformations.

To further investigate the temperature-dependent behavior of the hyperon, we analyzed its Nilsson single-particle energy levels in comparison with neutron orbitals. As illustrated in Fig. 6, the temperature evolution of the hyperon single-particle energy levels closely resembles that of the neutron single-particle energy levels.

Fig. 6
(Color online) Same as Fig. 5, but for Λ hyperon
pic

At low temperatures, the Λ hyperon exclusively occupies the 1s1/2 orbit, resulting in the Fermi surface coinciding with this orbit. As the temperature increases, the Fermi surface gradually shifts downward relative to the 1s1/2 orbit, and the splitting of the 1p3/2 orbit becomes enhanced, particularly at large quadrupole deformations. The occupancy probabilities of the hyperon orbitals undergo marked redistribution, indicating that thermal excitation increases the probability of hyperons occupying higher-energy states.

The observations of the downward shift of the Fermi energy and enhanced orbital splitting in both neutron and hyperon single-particle energy levels suggest a universal response of single-particle dynamics to thermal excitations in deformed nuclei.

The properties of the single-Λ hypernucleus at different temperatures are listed in Table 1. The root-mean-square (rms) radii of protons and neutrons exhibit small variations with increasing temperature, remaining within the ranges of 2.87–2.89 fm and 2.90–2.92 fm, respectively. In contrast, the rms radius of the Λ hyperon increases from 2.52 fm to 2.62 fm over the same temperature range. This indicates that the nucleon distribution is relatively insensitive to temperature changes compared to the hyperon, because it is much easier to be influenced by the temperature for a single-Λ hyperon than for a large nucleus composed of many protons and neutrons whose center densities are less sensitive to temperature. This trend is consistent with the findings of Ref. [36].

Table 1
For a given temperature T, calculated root-mean-squared radii (q=n, p, and Λ), quadrupole deformation parameters , single-Λ binding energy BΛ, entropy S, and occupation probabilities v2 of the Λ hyperon in the 1s, 1p states in
T (MeV) (fm) (fm) (fm) β2n β2p BΛ (MeV) S v2
[000 1/2] [110 1/2] [101 1/2,3/2]
0.0 2.88 2.90 2.52 0.45 0.61 0.23 16.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
0.5 2.89 2.91 2.53 0.46 0.63 0.25 15.98 2.44 0.50 0.00 0.00
1.0 2.90 2.92 2.54 0.45 0.63 0.28 15.96 6.15 0.50 0.00 0.00
1.5 2.89 2.92 2.55 0.42 0.59 0.28 15.98 8.06 0.50 0.00 0.00
2.0 2.88 2.92 2.57 0.38 0.53 0.28 15.93 9.24 0.48 0.01 0.00
2.5 2.87 2.92 2.60 0.29 0.40 0.22 15.78 10.12 0.46 0.02 0.01
2.8 2.87 2.92 2.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.42 10.65 0.46 0.01 0.01
Show more

At low temperatures (T≤1.0 MeV), nucleons are thermally excited from low-energy levels to high-energy orbitals near the Fermi surface, where they are more sensitive to the nuclear deformation potentials. This resulted in a slight increase in the overall deformation.

However, as the temperature exceeded 1.0 MeV, the deformation gradually decreased and eventually vanished at 2.8 MeV. This trend arises because higher temperatures lead to increased nucleon excitations from lower-energy states to higher-energy states, causing the nucleon distribution to become more uniform. Consequently, the Fermi surface smears, shell effects weaken, and deformation diminishes as the temperature increases.

Moreover, the single-Λ binding energy BΛ is a key observable characterizing hypernuclear stability, which is defined as the difference between the hypernucleus and the core nucleus without a hyperon. BΛ decreases monotonically with temperature, with the rate of decrease accelerating above T>2.0 MeV. This behavior originates from the reduction of the hyperon potential with increasing temperature, leading to a decrease in the binding energy at higher temperatures. Simultaneously, the entropy S of the hypernuclear system increases with temperature, directly reflecting the enhanced thermal excitation of this system. As more particles transition from low-energy to high-energy states, the resulting broadening of the nucleon and hyperon wave functions leads to increased disorder in the quantum many-body system. In addition to the global quantities, the Λ hyperon occupation probabilities v2 with temperature provide valuable microscopic insight into the thermal response of the hypernuclear system. At low temperatures (T≤1.5 MeV), the Λ hyperon predominantly occupies the lowest s-orbit, [000 1/2], with an occupation probability close to , whereas the p-shell states remain essentially unoccupied. As the temperature increases, thermal excitation leads to the partial population of higher-lying states. At T = 2.0 MeV, the occupation of the [110 1/2] state becomes noticeable, reaching v2 = 0.02 by T = 2.5 MeV. Simultaneously, the [101 1/2] and [101 3/2] orbitals also began to acquire finite occupancy. It is important to note that, owing to the weak spin-orbit interaction for the Λ hyperon, the [101 1/2] and [101 3/2] orbitals are nearly degenerate and can be treated collectively.

To assess the robustness of the conclusion that cluster structures in disappear with increasing temperature, we investigated the sensitivity of the results to variations in both YN and NN interactions. Several representative microscopic YN forces NSC97f, NSC97a, NSC89, and ESC08 were employed in combination with the Skyrme NN parameter set SkI4. The thermal evolution of the cluster structures exhibited negligible dependence on the choice of YN interaction, indicating that the presence of the Λ hyperon induces only subtle changes in the relative free-energy surfaces.

In contrast, varying the NN interaction parameters (SkI3, SkI4, SLy4, and SLy5) produced more noticeable differences in the relative free-energy surfaces, as shown in Fig. 7. The SkI3 and SkI4 results are similar, with clustering weakening as the temperature increased and vanishing at T = 2.8 MeV. In contrast, with SLy4 and SLy5, clustering disappeared at a lower temperature of T = 2.2 MeV. These differences are reflected in the slight shifts in the position and depth of the local minima on the free-energy surface. However, the overall trend, clustering suppression with increasing temperature, remained unchanged, indicating that while the NN interaction affects the quantitative details, it does not alter the qualitative behavior.

Fig. 7
(Color online) Relative free energies, ΔF(β2, T), as functions of the quadrupole deformation parameter β2, calculated at finite temperatures for using three different Skyrme NN interactions: SkI3, SLy4, and SLy5. The YN interaction NSC97f in the calculations is the same
pic

These findings indicate that the temperature-induced delocalization in the deformed hypernucleus represents a robust prediction within the FT-SHF framework, which is independent of the specific choice of the YN interaction. Although the selection of the NN interaction can affect the precise value of the critical temperature, it does not alter the general trend of temperature-driven delocalization in the system.

5

Summary

In this study, finite temperature SHF calculations were performed to investigate the localization and clustering phenomena in hypernucleus . For the nucleon-nucleon interaction, the Skyrme force SkI4 is adopted, while for the hyperon-nucleon interaction, the microscopic Nijmegen interaction NSC97f is employed.

By employing the total intrinsic density function in conjunction with the kernel localization function, the clustering characteristics of the highly deformed ground state in at zero temperature can be readily observed. The localization and clustering characteristics progressively diminished with escalating temperature, culminating in their complete disappearance upon reaching a threshold of 2.8 MeV. This is because temperature weakens deformation, facilitating the spatial localization of nucleons and promoting cluster formation. Hence, the density spreads across the surface region and destroys localization characteristics.

Furthermore, we examined the effects of temperature on the neutron and hyperon Nilsson single-particle energy levels. As the temperature increases, the thermal excitations of nucleons enhance, leading to a downward shift of the Fermi surface and an enlarged orbital splitting. This effect is particularly pronounced in the well-deformed region, where the deformation-induced splitting of the energy levels becomes more significant with increasing temperature.

In addition, we investigate the temperature-dependence of the radii, deformation, single-Λ binding energy, and entropy for . The temperature-induced variation in the hyperon radius is more pronounced than that in the proton and neutron radii because the single hyperon is more easily excited than the numerous nucleons in the core.

Finally, it is demonstrated that the NN interactions can affect the precise value of the critical temperature. However, the general trend of temperature-driven delocalization in the system is robust against NN and YN interactions.

References
1.M. Danysz, J. Pniewski,

Delayed disintegration of a heavy nuclear fragment: I

. Philos. Mag. 44, 348 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440308520318
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2.M. Isaka, M. Kimura, A. Dote et al.,

Deformation of hypernuclei studied with antisymmetrized molecular dynamics

. Phys. Rev. C 83, 044323 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.044323
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3.M. Isaka, H. Homma, M. Kimura et al.,

Modification of triaxial deformation and change of spectrum in Λ25Mg caused by the Λ hyperon

. Phys. Rev. C 85, 034303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.034303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4.J.W. Cui, X.R. Zhou, L.X. Guo et al.,

Investigation of single- and double-Λ hypernuclei using a beyond-mean-field approach

. Phys. Rev. C 95, 024323 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024323
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5.E. Hiyama, M. Kamimura, K. Miyazaki et al.,

γ transitions in A=7 hypernuclei and a possible derivation of hypernuclear size

. Phys. Rev. C 59, 2351-2360 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.59.2351
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6.Y. Tanimura,

Clusterization and deformation of multi-Λ hypernuclei within a relativistic mean-field model

. Phys. Rev. C 99, 034324 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.034324
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7.D. Vretenar, W. Pöschl, G.A. Lalazissis et al.,

Relativistic meanfield description of light Λ hypernuclei with large neutron excess

. Phys. Rev. C 57, R1060-R1063 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.57.R1060
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8.X.R. Zhou, A. Polls, H.J. Schulze et al.,

Λ hyperons and the neutron drip line

. Phys. Rev. C 78, 054306 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.054306
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9.Y. Zhang, J. Hu, P. Liu,

Massive neutron star with strangeness in a relativistic mean-field model with a high-density cutoff

. Phys. Rev. C 97, 015805 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.015805
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10.G.F. Burgio, H.J. Schulze, I. Vidaña et al.,

Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103879 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103879
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11.Y.G. Ma,

Hypernuclei as a laboratory to test hyperon-nucleon interactions

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 97 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01248-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12.J.H. Chen, F.K. Guo, Y.G. Ma et al.,

Production of exotic hadrons in pp and nuclear collisions

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 55 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01664-w
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13.W. Keil, H.T. Janka,

Hadronic phase transitions at supranuclear densities and the delayed collapse of newly formed neutron stars

. Astron. Astrophys. 296, 145 (1995) https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1995A
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14.Z. Yu, G.Z. Liu, M.F. Zhu et al.,

Thermal neutron stars including the hyperon-hyperon interactions

. Nucl. Phys. A 834, 97c-99c (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.01.029
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15.M. Oertel, F. Gulminelli, C. Providência et al.,

Hyperons in neutron stars and supernova cores

. Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 1-22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16050-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16.A.S. Botvina, K.K. Gudima, J. Steinheimer et al.,

Formation of hypernuclei in heavy-ion collisions around the threshold energies

. Phys. Rev. C 95, 014902 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.014902
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17.P. Liu, J.H. Chen, Y.G. Ma et al.,

Production of light nuclei and hypernuclei at high intensity accelerator facility energy region

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0207-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18.Z.Q. Feng,

Formation and dynamics of exotic hypernuclei in heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 102, 044604 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044604
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19.J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J.R. Adams et al.,

Global polarization of Λ hyperons in Au + Au collisions at sNN=200

Gev. Phys. Rev. C 98, 014910 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014910
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20.J. Adam et al.,

Measurement of the mass difference and the binding energy of the hypertriton and antihypertriton

. Nat. Phys. 16, 409-412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0799-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21.B. Dönigus et al.,

(Anti-)matter and hyper-matter production at the LHC with ALICE

. Nucl. Phys. A 904, 547c-550c (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.02.073
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22.B. Dönigus et al.,

Exotica production with alice

. Eur. Phys. J. Web Conf. 97, 00013 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20159700013
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23.T.R. Saito, D. Nakajima, C. Rappold et al.,

Production of hypernuclei in peripheral HI collisions: the HypHI project at GSI

. Nucl. Phys. A 881, 218-227 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2012.02.011
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24.K.T. Brinkmann, P. Gianotti, I. Lehmann,

Exploring the mysteries of strong interactions—the panda experiment

. Nucl. Phys. News 16, 15-18 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/10506890600579868
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25.I. Vassiliev, P. Senger, I. Kisel et al.,

Hypernuclei program at the CBM experiment

. JPS Conf. Proc. 17, 092001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.17.092001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26.C. Rappold, J. López-Fidalgo,

Examination of experimental conditions for the production of proton-rich and neutron-rich hypernuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 044616 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.044616
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27.Y.B. Ivanov, A.A. Soldatov,

Vorticity in heavy-ion collisions at the JINR nuclotron-based ion collider facility

. Phys. Rev. C 95, 054915 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054915
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28.X. Chen, J. Yang, J. Xia et al.,

Study of eddy current effect in BRing at HIAF

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 920, 37-42 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.10.206
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29.J.L. Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. Cugnon, J.C. David et al.,

Hypernuclei formation in spallation reactions by coupling the liège intranuclear cascade model to the deexcitation code abla

. Phys. Rev. C 105, 014623 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014623
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30.V. Topor Pop, S. Das Gupta,

Model for hypernucleus production in heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 81, 054911 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.054911
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31.P. Braun-Munzinger, B. Dönigus,

Loosely-bound objects produced in nuclear collisions at the LHC

. Nucl. Phys. A 987, 144-201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.02.006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32.S. Reddy, M. Prakash, J.M. Lattimer et al.,

Effects of strong and electromagnetic correlations on neutrino interactions in dense matter

. Phys. Rev. C 59, 2888-2918 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.59.2888
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33.L.F. Roberts, G. Shen, V. Cirigliano et al.,

Protoneutron star cooling with convection: The effect of the symmetry energy

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 061103 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.061103
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34.A.S. Botvina, N. Buyukcizmeci, A. Ergun et al.,

Formation of hypernuclei in evaporation and fission processes

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 054615 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054615
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35.A. Ravlić, E. Yüksel, T. Nikšić et al.,

Expanding the limits of nuclear stability at finite temperature

. Nat. Commun. 14, 4834 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40613-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36.J. Hu, Z. Zhang, S. Bao et al.,

Phase transition in hot Λ hypernuclei within the relativistic thomas-fermi approximation

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 054325 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054325
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37.B. Suleymanli, K. Bozkurt, E. Khan et al.,

Effects of finite temperature and pairing correlations in multi-Λ hypernuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 110, 014329 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.014329
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
38.S.S. Avancini, M. Ferreira, H. Pais et al.,

Light clusters and pasta phases in warm and dense nuclear matter

. Phys. Rev. C 95, 045804 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.045804
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
39.T. Custódio, A. Falcão, H. Pais et al.,

Light clusters in warm stellar matter: calibrating the cluster couplings

. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 295 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00302-w
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
40.G. Röpke,

Light nuclei quasiparticle energy shifts in hot and dense nuclear matter

. Phys. Rev. C 79, 014002 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.014002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
41.K. Sumiyoshi, G. Röpke,

Appearance of light clusters in postbounce evolution of core-collapse supernovae

. Phys. Rev. C 77, 055804 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.055804
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
42.Z. Ren, S. Elhatisari, T.A. Lähde et al.,

Ab initio study of nuclear clustering in hot dilute nuclear matter

. Phys. Lett. B 850, 138463 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138463
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
43.E. Yüksel, F. Mercier, J.P. Ebran et al.,

Clustering in nuclei at finite temperature

. Phys. Rev. C 106, 054309 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.054309
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
44.B. Li, D. Vretenar, Z.X. Ren et al.,

Fission dynamics, dissipation, and clustering at finite temperature

. Phys. Rev. C 107, 014303 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.014303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
45.A.L. Goodman,

Finite-temperature HFB theory

. Nucl. Phys. A 352, 30-44 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(81)90557-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
46.Y.F. Niu, Z.M. Niu, N. Paar et al.,

Pairing transitions in finitetemperature relativistic hartree-bogoliubov theory

. Phys. Rev. C 88, 034308 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.034308
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
47.J.J. Li, J. Margueron, W.H. Long et al.,

Pairing phase transition: A finite-temperature relativistic hartree-fock-bogoliubov study

. Phys. Rev. C 92, 014302 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.014302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
48.A. Ravlić, Y.F. Niu, T. Nikšić et al.,

Finite-temperature linear response theory based on relativistic hartree bogoliubov model with point-coupling interaction

. Phys. Rev. C 104, 064302 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.064302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
49.M. Bender, P.H. Heenen, P.G. Reinhard,

Self-consistent meanfield models for nuclear structure

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121-180 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
50.J.R. Stone, P.G. Reinhard,

The Skyrme interaction in finite nuclei and nuclear matter

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 58, 587-657 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2006.07.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
51.E.B. Huo, K.R. Li, X.Y. Qu et al.,

Continuum Skyrme Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov theory with Green’s function method for neutron- rich Ca, Ni, Zr, and Sn isotopes

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 105 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01261-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
52.X.R. Zhou, H.J. Schulze, H. Sagawa et al.,

Hypernuclei in the deformed Skyrme–Hartree–Fock approach

. Phys. Rev. C 76, 034312 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.034312
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
53.H.J. Schulze, T. Rijken,

Hypernuclear structure with the Nijmegen ESC08 potentials

. Phys. Rev. C 88, 024322 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.024322
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
54.H.J. Schulze, E. Hiyama,

Skyrme force for light and heavy hypernuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 90, 047301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.047301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
55.J. Guo, X.R. Zhou, H.J. Schulze,

Skyrme force for all known Ξ− hypernuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 104, L061307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L061307
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
56.C.F. Chen, Q.B. Chen, X.R. Zhou et al.,

Effects of hyperons on the deformations of even–even nuclei *

. Chin. Phys. C 46, 064109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ac5b58
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
57.J. Guo, C.F. Chen, X.R. Zhou et al.,

ΛΛ pairing effects in spherical and deformed multi-Λ hyperisotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 105, 034322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.034322
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
58.H.T. Xue, Y.F. Chen, Q.B. Chen et al.,

Deformation and spin–orbit splitting of Λ hypernuclei in the Skyrme–Hartree–Fock approach

. Phys. Rev. C 107, 044317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.044317
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
59.H.T. Xue, J.W. Cui, Q.B. Chen et al.,

Shape coexistence in ne isotopes and hyperon impurity effect on low-lying states

. Phys. Rev. C 110, 044310 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.044310
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
60.P.G. Reinhard, J.A. Maruhn, A.S. Umar et al.,

Localization in light nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 83, 034312 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034312
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
61.T. Ichikawa, J.A. Maruhn, N. Itagaki et al.,

Linear chain structure of four-α clusters in 16O

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 112501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.112501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
62.Y. Fukuoka, S. Shinohara, Y. Funaki et al.,

Deformation and cluster structures in 12C studied with configuration mixing using skyrme interactions

. Phys. Rev. C 88, 014321 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.014321
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
63.X. Li, C.F. Chen, X.R. Zhou et al.,

Clusterization and localization of multi-Λ hyperisotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 109, 064301 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.064301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
64.B. Zhou, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi et al.,

Nonlocalized clustering: A new concept in nuclear cluster structure physics

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 262501 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.262501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
65.Y. Kanada-En’yo, K. Ogata,

Properties of Kπ=01+, Kπ = 2−, and Kπ=01− bands of 20Ne probed via proton and α inelastic scattering

. Phys. Rev. C 101, 064308 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064308
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
66.B. Zhou, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi et al.,

The 5α condensate state in 20Ne

. Nat. Commun. 14, 8206 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43816-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
67.T. Kawabata,

The 5α condensate state in 20Ne

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01385-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
68.M. Rayet,

Self-consistent calculations of hypernuclear properties with the Skyrme interaction

. Ann. Phys. 102, 226-251 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(76)90262-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
69.H.J. Schulze,

Skyrme forces for lambda and cascade hypernuclei

. AIP Conf. Proc. 2130, 020009 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5118377
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
70.T.T. Sun, E. Hiyama, H. Sagawa et al.,

Mean-field approaches for Ξ− hypernuclei and current experimental data

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 064319 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.064319
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
71.P. Bonche, S. Levit, D. Vautherin,

Properties of highly excited nuclei

. Nucl. Phys. A 427, 278-296 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(84)90086-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
72.P.G. Reinhard, B. Schuetrumpf, J. Maruhn,

The axial Hartree–Fock + BCS code SkyAx

. Comput. Phys. Commun. 258, 107603 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107603
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
73.D. Vautherin, D.M. Brink,

Hartree–Fock calculations with Skyrme’s interaction. Ⅰ. Spherical nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 5, 626-647 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.5.626
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
74.D. Vautherin,

Hartree–Fock calculations with Skyrme’s interaction. Ⅱ. Axially deformed nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 7, 296-316 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.7.296
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
75.M. Rayet,

Skyrme parametrization of an effective Λ-nucleon interaction

. Nucl. Phys. A 367, 381-397 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(81)90655-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
76.P.G. Reinhard, H. Flocard,

Nuclear effective forces and isotope shifts

. Nucl. Phys. A 584, 467-488 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)00770-N
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
77.E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel et al.,

A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities Part. Nuclei far from stabilitiesⅡ

. Nucl. Phys. A 635, 231-256 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00180-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
78.V. Martin, J.L. Egido, L.M. Robledo,

Thermal shape fluctuation effects in the description of hot nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 68, 034327 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.034327
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
79.J.L. Egido, P. Ring,

The decay of hot nuclei

. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 19, 1 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/19/1/002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
80.J.L. Egido,

Quantum versus statistical fluctuations in mean-field theories

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 767-770 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.767
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
81.A.L. Goodman,

Statistical fluctuations in the i132 model

. Phys. Rev. C 29, 1887-1896 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.29.1887
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
82.E. Khan, N. Van Giai, N. Sandulescu. Nucl. Phys. A 789, 94-102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.005
83.J.A. Sheikh, W. Nazarewicz, J.C. Pei,

Systematic study of fission barriers of excited superheavy nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 80, 011302 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.011302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
84.R. Lisboa, M. Malheiro, B.V. Carlson,

Dirac–Hartree–Bogoliubov calculation for spherical and deformed hot nuclei: temperature dependence of the pairing energy and gaps, nuclear deformation, nuclear radii, excitation energy, and entropy

. Phys. Rev. C 93, 024321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.024321
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
85.J.P. Ebran, E. Khan, T. Nikšić et al.,

Localization and clustering in the nuclear Fermi liquid

. Phys. Rev. C 87, 044307 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.044307
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
86.E. Khan, L. Heitz, F. Mercier et al.,

α-particle formation and clustering in nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 106, 064330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.064330
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
87.E.F. Zhou, J.M. Yao, Z.P. Li et al.,

Anatomy of molecular structures in 20Ne

. Phys. Lett. B 753, 227-231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.028
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
Footnote

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.