logo

Probing QCD confinement with spin-spin correlation in proton-proton collisions

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT

Probing QCD confinement with spin-spin correlation in proton-proton collisions

Zuo-Tang Liang
Qing-Hua Xu
Jin-Long Zhang
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.37, No.5Article number 86Published in print May 2026Available online 23 Feb 2026
13000

An important feature of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), is that the strong force grows as the distance between partons increases, which confines partons into hadrons, commonly known as QCD confinement. Perturbative QCD (pQCD) does not work at large distance, such as the length scale of a hadron, which is the regime of nonperturbative QCD. The detailed QCD mechanisms through which confinement occurs from partons to hadrons (usually known as hadronization), and how it manifests itself in partonic structure of hadrons (usually known as parton distribution), remain unresolved puzzles of first-principle QCD calculations.

Spin, as a fundamental degree of freedom, plays a critical role in QCD and often brings surprises. For example, the large transverse polarization of Λ hyperons observed in unpolarized hadron-hadron and hadron-nucleus collisions in the 1970s [1, 2] could not be described by pQCD [3]. Similarly, sizable transverse single-spin asymmetries have also been observed for the hadrons produced in transversely polarized hadron collisions since the 1970s [4], which again cannot be explained by pQCD [3]. Important progress has been achieved in recent years, and these two phenomena can now be described under the high-twist framework and/or transverse momentum dependent (TMD) framework with non-perturbative TMD parton distributions and fragmentation functions [5-7]. These two frameworks are proven to work at different scales in different processes and describe the same physics in the overlap region [8, 9].

Another famous spin puzzle is the spin structure of the proton, which is also a nonperturbative question in QCD. In 1987, EMC measurements indicated that quark spin contributions only account for a very small fraction of the proton spin [10]. This is in stark contrast to the expectation from the naive quark model under the SU(6) picture [11] that 100% of the proton spin arises from the valence quark spin, triggering the so-called “spin crisis”. After approximately 40 years’ of efforts in both experiments and theory, we know that there are also significant contributions from the gluon spin, sea quark spin, and orbital angular momentum that are related to the TMD distribution functions [12, 13]. Worldwide facilities, including the RHIC at BNL, JLab, COMPASS at CERN, and HERMES at DESY, have been dedicated to studying the proton spin structure [14], to be continued with the proposed facilities such as EIC [15] and EicC [16].

The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory, is the world’s first and only polarized proton-proton collider. The RHIC is capable of proton-proton collisions at GeV and 500 GeV, thus providing unique opportunities to study the above-mentioned fundamental questions, including QCD confinement and proton spin structure [17, 18].

In high-energy proton-proton collisions, virtual quark-antiquark pairs can be liberated from the QCD vacuum. These virtual pairs, including strange quark-antiquark pairs, are initially quantum spin-entangled and later undergo quark confinement to form hadrons such as hyperons, whose properties can serve as probes into QCD confinement. The pair is expected to be inherited from spin-correlated strange quark-antiquark pairs. The spin correlation of pair can reveal the spin states of the strange quark-antiquark pair, as the strange valence quark carries 100% of the Λ spin under the naive quark model. Fortunately, the spin polarization of the Λ hyperon can be measured via the angular distribution of the decay daughter proton in its rest frame, as illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
(Color online) Illustration of tracing the QCD evolution of the spin of an pair into a hyperon pair and its measurement in STAR. (a) Relativistic pp collisions excite the QCD vacuum and liberate quark pairs; (b) Some are spin-triplet pairs; (c) Confinement drives their hadronization; (d) Some pairs form hyperons whose spins are accessible through weak decays; (e) STAR reconstructs the decay daughters to determine the Λ and spin correlation. (Figure taken from [19])
pic

Spin correlation analysis and results — In a recent article published in Nature [19], the STAR Collaboration reported the first evidence of spin correlations in hyperon pairs in pp collisions at GeV. A relative correlation signal of (18±4)% was observed, which links the spin-correlated quark pairs in the QCD vacuum to their final-state hadron counterparts. This work was mainly conducted by a team at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, led by Zhoudunming Tu and Jan Vanek. Crucially, this correlation vanishes when the hyperon pairs are widely separated in rapidity and azimuthal space, consistent with the decoherence of the quantum system.

Λ and hyperons are reconstructed through their weak decays, and at STAR. High-purity hyperon samples were selected and paired to extract the spin correlation, which is determined from the following angular distribution of the decay daughters of the hyperon pair [20],pic (1)where is the spin correlation signal of the Λ hyperon pair, α1 and α2 are the weak decay parameters, and θ is the angle between the two (anti-)protons which are boosted into the rest frames of the parent hyperons [20].

Figure 2 shows the results of spin–spin correlation between Λ and , versus their separation in the rapidity and azimuthal space [19]). A significant correlation is observed when the pair is close in the phase space (ΔR < 1). This magnitude is compatible with the expectations from a spin-triplet state in simple quark-model descriptions, including SU(6) and the Burkardt–Jaffe model, both shown in Fig. 2. No spin correlation is observed within the uncertainties for the Λ-Λ or pairs, consistent with the absence of an initial correlated source q-q or . As a null check, the pair showed no correlation, as expected.

Fig. 2
(Color online) Spin correlation as a function of pair separation ΔR. The data were compared with the predictions from the SU(6) quark model and Burkardt-Jaffe model. Statistical uncertainties are denoted by error bars, and systematic uncertainties are represented by shaded boxes. The blue and yellow arrows are used to illustrate the separation of the pairs. (Figure taken from [19])
pic

Physics implication — The measurement provides an experimental window into the earliest nonperturbative stage of hadron formation. The persistence of the spin correlation suggests that a part of the quantum state of the virtual pair survives the confinement process, leaving a measurable imprint in the final hyperons. This connection between vacuum quark-antiquark fluctuations and hadron spin opens a novel avenue for probing confinement. In particular, the observed ΔR dependence of the spin correlation indicates a stronger spin correlation in the short range, most probably when they come from parton’s hadronization. This can be further verified with the spin correlation of the hyperon pair associated with jet production in pp collisions.

Conceptually, this work brings quantum information ideas—entanglement, decoherence, and spin correlation—into high-energy QCD studies, and provides a new experimental paradigm for exploring the dynamics and interplay of quark confinement and entanglement. The vanishing of the correlation at large separation offers an experimentally accessible measure of decoherence in a strongly interacting non-perturbative system.

Outlook — The first results of the spin correlation of hyperon pair invite follow-up studies in multiple directions. Measurements at higher energies, different collision systems (p+A or A+A), or using multi-strange hyperons (Ξ, Ω) could reveal the dependence of spin-state survival on the system size and hadronization environment. In particular, the spin-spin correlation of hyperon pairs in heavy-ion collisions can provide further information on the properties of the Guark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) and even the QCD phase transition, going beyond the global polarization effect in A+A collisions [21-25]. On the theoretical side, quantitative modeling of spin-state evolution during confinement—possibly connecting QCD-based fragmentation models, TMD evolution, and quantum-information measures—will be essential for interpreting the magnitude and scale dependence of the observed effects. Overall, this study represents a milestone that links QCD vacuum fluctuations, hadron formation, and spin phenomena within a unified experimental framework.

The RHIC spin program has produced a remarkable breadth of exciting results over the years, utilizing unique polarized p+p collisions [26-28]. These explorations are demonstrated clearly in the flagship measurements of the gluon and sea-quark helicity distributions [17]. The STAR measurements of W± single spin asymmetry, for the first time, concluded that there is a clear flavor asymmetry between the helicity distributions of and [29, 30]. The double spin asymmetry measurements of the reconstructed jets revealed a significant contribution (~ 40%) of the gluon spin to the proton spin [28, 31]. The spin transfer and polarization measurements in p+p collisions at RHIC [32-36], provide sensitivities to strange quark polarization and the polarized fragmentation functions. Recent measurements of transverse spin asymmetries with transversely polarized p+p collisions [37-39] have deepened our understanding of the 3-dimensional structure of nucleons, in particular the transverse momentum-dependent (TMD) parton distribution functions and fragmentation functions.

Recently, the landmark observation of global hyperon polarization in heavy-ion collisions by STAR [40, 41], confirming the predictions made 20 years ago [42, 43], has established spin measurement as a new tool for QGP studies [21, 25]. The observed global spin alignment of the vector meson indicates a possible spin correlation of the quark-antiquark pair, which could naturally lead to a spin correlation of the hyperon pair [22, 23, 41]. The above-discussed spin correlation study in p+p, p+A and A+A opens a new avenue for both cold and hot QCD studies.

References
1.G. Bunce, R. Handler, R. March, et al.,

Λ0 hyperon polarization in inclusive production by 300-GeV protons on beryllium

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 11131116 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1113
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2.A.D. Panagiotou,

Λ0 Polarization in Hadron - Nucleon, Hadron - Nucleus and Nucleus-nucleus Interactions

. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5, 1197 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X90000568
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3.G.L. Kane, J. Pumplin, W. Repko,

Transverse quark polarization in large-pT reactions, e+e- jets, and leptoproduction: A test of quantum chromodynamics

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 16891692 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.41.1689
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4.R.D. Klem, J.E. Bowers, H.W. Courant, et al.,

Measurement of asymmetries of inclusive pion production in proton-proton interactions at 6 and 11.8 GeV/c

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 929931 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.929
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5.Z.T. Liang, C. Boros,

Single spin asymmetries in inclusive high-energy hadron hadron collision processes

. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 927982 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X0000046X
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6.U. D’Alesio, F. Murgia,

Azimuthal and single spin asymmetries in hard scattering processes

. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 61, 394454 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.01.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7.K.B. Chen, S.Y. Wei, Z.T. Liang,

Three-dimensional imaging of the nucleon and semi-inclusive high-energy reactions

. Frontiers of Physics 10, 101204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-015-0477-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8.X. Ji, J.W. Qiu, W. Vogelsang, et al.,

Unified picture for single transverse-spin asymmetries in hard-scattering processes

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 082002 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.082002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9.F. Yuan, J. Zhou,

Collins function and the single transverse spin asymmetry

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 052001 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.052001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10.J. Ashman,

(EMC), A measurement of the spin asymmetry and determination of the structure function g1 in deep inelastic muon-proton scattering

. Physics Letters B 206, 364370 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11.J.D. Bjorken,

Applications of the chiral U(6)⊗U(6) algebra of current densities

. Phys. Rev. 148, 14671478 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.148.1467
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12.C.A. Aidala, S.D. Bass, D. Hasch, et al.,

The spin structure of the nucleon

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 655691 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.655
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13.X. Ji, F. Yuan, Y. Zhao,

What we know and what we don’t know about the proton spin after 30 years

. Nature Rev. Phys. 3, 2738 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00248-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14.P. Achenbach, D. Adhikari, A. Afanasev, et al.,

The present and future of QCD

. Nucl. Phys. A 1047, 122874 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122874
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15.R. Abdul Khalek, A. Accardi, J. Adam, et al.,

Science requirements and detector concepts for the electron-ion collider: Eic yellow report

. Nuclear Physics A 1026, 122447 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16.D.P. Anderle, V. Bertone, X. Cao, et al.,

Electron-ion collider in china

. Frontiers of Physics 16, 64701 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-021-1062-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17.G. Bunce, N. Saito, J. Soffer, et al.,

Prospects for spin physics at RHIC

. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 50, 525575 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.50.1.525
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18.M. Harrison, T. Ludlam, S. Ozaki,

RHIC project overview

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499, 235244 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01937-X
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19.STAR Collaboration,

Measuring spin correlation between quarks during QCD confinement

. Nature 650, 6571 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09920-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20.W. Gong, G. Parida, Z. Tu, et al.,

Measurement of Bell-type inequalities and quantum entanglement fromΛ-hyperon spin correlations at high energy colliders

. Phys. Rev. D 106, L031501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L031501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21.J. Chen, X. Dong, X. He, et al.,

Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 214 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22.J.H. Chen, Z.T. Liang, Y.G. Ma, et al.,

Vector meson’s spin alignments in high energy reactions

. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 211001 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-024-2495-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23.J.P. Lv, Z.H. Yu, Z.T. Liang, et al.,

Global quark spin correlations in relativistic heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. D 109, 114003 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24.H.L. Chen, W.j. Fu, X.G. Huang, et al.,

Fluctuations and Correlations of Quark Spin in Hot and Dense QCD Matter

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 032302 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/g1bh-85h4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25.X.G. Huang,

An introduction to relativistic spin hydrodynamics

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 208 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01784-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26.Q. Xu,

Recent results on nucleon spin structure study at RHIC

. Front. Phys. (Beijing) 10, 101402 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-015-0480-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27.Q.H. Xu, Z.T. Liang,

Nucleon spin structure and measurements on sea quark polarization at RHIC

. Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astro. 49, 102007 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1360/SSPMA-2019-0048
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28.E.C. Aschenauer, K. Barish, A. Bazilevsky, et al.,

The RHIC Cold QCD Program

. arXiv:2302.00605
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29.L. Adamczyk, J.K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, et al.,

Measurement of longitudinal spin asymmetries for weak boson production in polarized proton-proton collisions at RHIC

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 072301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.072301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30.J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J.R. Adams, et al.,

Measurement of the longitudinal spin asymmetries for weak boson production in proton-proton collisions at s=510 GeV

. Phys. Rev. D 99, 051102 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.051102
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31.I. Borsa, M. Stratmann, W. Vogelsang, et al.,

Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Global Analysis of Polarized Parton Distribution Functions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 151901 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.151901
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32.B.I. Abelev, M.M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, et al.,

Longitudinal Spin Transfer to Lambda and anti-Lambda Hyperons in Polarized Proton-Proton Collisions at s=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. D 80, 111102 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.111102
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33.J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J.R. Adams, et al.,

Improved measurement of the longitudinal spin transfer to Λ and Λ¯ hyperons in polarized proton-proton collisions at s=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. D 98, 112009 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.112009
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34.J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J.R. Adams, et al.,

Transverse spin transfer to Λ and Λ¯ hyperons in polarized proton-proton collisions at s=200  GeV

. Phys. Rev. D 98, 091103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.091103
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35.M.I. Abdulhamid, B.E. Aboona, J. Adam, et al.,

Longitudinal and transverse spin transfer to Λ and Λ¯ hyperons in polarized p+p collisions at s=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. D 109, 012004 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.012004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36.STAR,

Measurement of transverse polarization of Λ and Λ¯ hyperons inside jets in pp collisions at s=200 GeV

. arXiv:2509.17487
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37.B.E. Aboona et al.

(STAR), Energy independence of the collins asymmetry in p↑p collisions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 261902 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/jgsw-zhny
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
38.M.S. Abdallah, B.E. Aboona, J. Adam, et al.,

Azimuthal transverse single-spin asymmetries of inclusive jets and identified hadrons within jets from polarized pp collisions at s=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. D 106, 072010 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.072010
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
39.J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J.R. Adams, et al.,

Measurement of transverse single-spin asymmetries of π0 and electromagnetic jets at forward rapidity in 200 and 500 GeV transversely polarized proton-proton collisions

. Phys. Rev. D 103, 092009 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.092009
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
40.L. Adamczyk, J. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, et al.,

GlobalΛhyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid

. Nature 548, 6265 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
41.M.S. Abdallah, B. Aboona, J. Adam, et al.,

Pattern of global spin alignment of ϕ and K*0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions

. Nature 614, 244248 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05557-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
42.Z.T. Liang, X.N. Wang,

Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102301 (2005). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.102301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
43.Z.T. Liang, X.N. Wang,

Spin alignment of vector mesons in non-central A+A collisions

. Phys. Lett. B 629, 2026 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.09.060
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar