logo

Probing the temperature of the quark soup at trillions of degrees

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT

Probing the temperature of the quark soup at trillions of degrees

Yu-Gang Ma
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.37, No.3Article number 51Published in print Mar 2026Available online 14 Jan 2026
2500

Following over 20 years of research, a direct measurement of the QGP temperature has been achieved at Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC), free from the blue-shift effect and contamination from strong interactions. This viewpoint discusses a recent measurement of the QGP temperature at different stages at the Solenoidal Tracker at RHIC (STAR), which used e+e- pairs as penetrating probes.

Temperature, one of the most fundamental physical parameters, serves as a critical probe for studying the core properties of matter in macroscopic and microscopic thermal systems, such as nuclear systems [1-4]. In the first microseconds following the Big Bang, the Universe was filled with an extremely hot primordial soup of quarks and gluons – a state of matter known as Quark–Gluon Plasma (QGP) [5]. Today, this exotic phase of matter can be recreated in laboratories via high-energy heavy-ion collisions, offering a unique avenue to investigate the dynamics and phase structure of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) [6-10]. To achieve these physics objectives, direct measurement of QGP temperatures is indispensable. It not only enables the exploration of the thermodynamic properties of this hot and dense matter but also provides direct access to the QCD phase structure, which is usually described by the relationship between temperature and baryon chemical potential of nuclear matter [11, 12].

In the realm of high-energy nuclear physics, the direct quantification of the QGP temperature is contingent upon the utilization of leptons and their antiparticles as golden probes. Dileptons, such as dielectron (e+e-) pairs, are regarded as an effective tool for directly probing the temperature of the emitting source [13]. These pairs are generated throughout the entire evolutionary process of the collision system. Despite their lack of strong interactions, dileptons within different kinematic ranges provide profound insights into the hot, dense matter formed during collisions, capturing information from distinct evolutionary stages. Notably, when focusing on the invariant mass spectra of dileptons, the measurements remain unaffected by the blue-shift effect induced by rapidly expanding collision systems. These characteristics make dileptons one of the key penetrating electromagnetic probes at major international high-energy nuclear physics facilities, including Bevalac, SIS18, SPS, RHIC, and LHC. Furthermore, this probe represents one of the primary experimental observables of the under-construction mega-projects, such as NICA and FAIR.

Recently published in Nature Communications [14], a new study by the STAR Collaboration reports the direct measurement of QGP temperatures across different evolution stages. Led by Frank Geurts, Zhangbu Xu, Chi Yang, and Zaochen Ye, the research was primarily driven by a joint team from Kent State University, Rice University, Shandong University, and South China Normal University. After two decades of effort, this measurement marks a significant milestone in achieving one of the core physics goals of electromagnetic probe research at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). The findings confirm the formation of a hot QGP phase during heavy-ion collisions based on the most critical parameter in thermodynamics. More notably, the team identified a stage where the temperature remained relatively stable and was close to the QCD phase boundary across varying collision energies and species.

This breakthrough is made possible by the successful development and operation of the Time-Of-Flight (TOF) detector [15, 16], which enables the measurement of electrons and positrons at STAR. Based on a joint effort between the Chinese and American teams [7], the TOF modules produced by the STAR China group were successfully installed at STAR in 2010, introducing electron identification capability and extending the particle identification capability of charged hadrons to a higher momentum region. During the past decade, based on energy loss and momentum measurements from the Time Projection Chamber (TPC) [17, 18] and the velocity provided by TOF, the STAR Collaboration has made inclusive e+e- pair measurements with high e+ and e- purities [19-23]. However, these dilepton measurements always face long-standing challenges due to statistical limitations, not only because of the rarity of e+e- pair production but also because they suffer from an extremely low signal-to-background ratio. Dileptons from hadronic decay and pollution from open heavy flavor semi-leptonic decays predominantly introduce large backgrounds. The Beam Energy Scan (BES) program at RHIC provides opportunities to study this rare probe across a wide range of collision energies, where the open charm decay decreases as the collision energy diminishes from the top energy at RHIC. In the BES Phase I, clear in-medium ρ0 broadening spectra have been observed [23, 24], although with limited precision. As one of the key observables that drive the planned data collection luminosities, measurements of dielectrons were enabled in the BES-Phase II program with reasonable statistics [25]. In addition to thermal dileptons, dileptons from photon-photon interactions, such as the Breit-Wheeler process, have been measured in ultra-peripheral collisions [26, 27].

As illustrated in Fig. 1, temperatures were derived by fitting the invariant mass spectra of thermal dielectrons across different ranges, each corresponding to a distinct period in the evolution of the QGP. Assuming that the dielectron continuum from QGP thermal radiation can be directly described by a function with a mass term (M3/2) multiplied by the Boltzmann factor (), the temperature in the intermediate mass range can be extracted. In the low mass range, where decay plays a dominant role, a function combining the ρ0 spectral term (relativistic Breit-Wigner function multiplied by the Boltzmann factor) and the QGP thermal radiation term was used. Around 170 MeV and 280 MeV were achieved for in-medium ρ0 dominance and QGP dominance regions, which correspond to 2.0 × 1012 K and 3.2 × 1012 K, respectively. This trillion-degree temperature is hundreds of thousands of times higher than that of the Sun’s core, confirming that the medium created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions exists in an extremely hot state on the Fermi scale.

Fig. 1
A brief layout of QCD phase diagram, showing the corresponding area where the temperatures were extracted by thermal dielectrons in different mass ranges. The dielectron continuum and fitting plot in the figure are from Ref. [14]
pic

One interesting observation is that, when compared with the results of the NA60 experiment [28], the ρ0-like region reveals intriguing temperatures. Across collision systems ranging from Au+Au to In+In, and collision energies from 54.4 to 17.3 GeV, the calculated temperatures are comparable. While in the higher mass region, where the QGP is dominant, the temperature measured by STAR is higher than that measured by NA60. Given that the temperature obtained from the HADES experiment at a similar mass range is significantly below Tc in Au+Au collisions at 2.42 GeV [29], this suggests that the QGP created at RHIC is hotter than that from NA60; however, they then reach a similar temperature close to the phase boundary. From the QGP temperature perspective, experimental physicists have discovered new evidence of behavior related to the phase boundary for the first time.

An intriguing element is that this team, using a steady and gradual methodology, is extending the research on dielectrons to energies down to 7.7 GeV by analyzing data from the BES-Phase II program [30]. The research is moving toward to a critical area of the QCD phase diagram, marked by rapid changes in the baryon chemical potential. This will improve our understanding of the factors affecting the medium’s thermal radiation. To approach the possible Critical End Point (CEP), upcoming experiments at NICA [31] and FAIR [32] will push dilepton research into the domain of quark-baryon matter, where penetrating probes are crucial for exploring the properties of this kind of matter. Recently, AI techniques have demonstrated potential in nuclear physics, see eg. Refs. [3, 4, 33-38]. Especially in studies involving extremely low signal-to-background ratios and rare signals, further AI applications will be beneficial for research on electromagnetic probes.

References
1.Y.G. Ma, J.B. Natowitz, R. Wada, et al.,

Critical behavior in light nuclear systems: Experimental aspects

. Phys. Rev. C 71, 054606 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.054606
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2.A. Kelic, J.B. Natowitz, K.H. Schmidt,

Nuclear thermometry

. Eur. Phys. J. A 30, 203-213 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10117-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3.R. Wang, Y.G. Ma, R. Wada, et al.,

Nuclear liquid-gas phase transition with machine learning

. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043202 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043202
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4.Y.D. Song, R. Wang, Y.G. Ma, et al.,

Determining the temperature in heavy-ion collisions with multiplicity distribution

. Phys. Lett. B 814, 136084 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136084
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5.J. Adams, M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, et al.,

Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR Collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions

. Nucl. Phys. A 757, 102-183 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.085
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6.B. Aboona, J. Adam, K. Adamczyk, et al.,

Precision measurement of net-proton-number fluctuations in Au+Au collisions at RHIC

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 142301 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/9l69-2d7p
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7.J.H. Chen, X. Dong, X. He, et al.,

Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 214 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8.Q.Y. Shou, Y.G. Ma, S. Zhang, et al.,

Properties of QCD matter: a review of selected results from ALICE experiment

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 219 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01583-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9.C.M. Ko,

Searching for QCD critical point with light nuclei

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 80 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01231-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10.X.F. Luo, N. Xu,

Search for the QCD critical point with fluctuations of conserved quantities in relativistic heavy-ion collisions at rhic: an overview

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0257-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11.P. Braun-Munzinger, V. Koch, T. Schäfer, et al.,

Properties of hot and dense matter from relativistic heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Rept. 621, 76-126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.12.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12.W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, W. van der Schee,

Heavy ion collisions: The big picture, and the big questions

. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 339-376 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020852
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13.F. Geurts, R.A. Tripolt,

Electromagnetic probes: Theory and experiment

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 128, 104004 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.104004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14.B.E. Aboona, et al.,

Temperature measurement of Quark-Gluon plasma at different stages

. Nature Commun. 16, 9098 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63216-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15.K.H. Ackermann, N. Adams, C. Adler, et al.,

STAR detector overview

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499, 624-632 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01960-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16.M. Shao, O.Y. Barannikova, X. Dong, et al.,

Extensive particle identification with TPC and TOF at the STAR experiment

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 558, 419-429 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.11.251
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17.M. Anderson, J. Berkovitz, W. Betts, et al.,

The Star time projection chamber: A Unique tool for studying high multiplicity events at RHIC

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499, 659-678 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01964-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18.C. Yang, J.H. Chen, Y.G. Ma, et al.,

Inner TPC upgrade at RHIC-STAR

. Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astro. 49, 102008 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1360/SSPMA-2019-0049
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19.L. Adamczyk, J. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, et al.,

Dielectron mass spectra from Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 022301 (2014). [Addendum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 113, 049903 (2014)]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.022301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20.L. Adamczyk, J. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, et al.,

Dielectron azimuthal anisotropy at mid-rapidity in Au + Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. C 90, 064904 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.064904
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21.L. Adamczyk, et al.,

Energy dependence of acceptance-corrected dielectron excess mass spectrum at mid-rapidity in Au+Au collisions at sNN=19.6 19.6 and 200 GeV

. Phys. Lett. B 750, 64-71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.08.044
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22.L. Adamczyk, et al.,

Direct virtual photon production in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV

. Phys. Lett. B 770, 451-458 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.04.050
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23.M.I. Abdulhamid, B. Aboona, J. Adam, et al.,

Measurements of dielectron production in Au+Au collisions at sNN=27, 39, and 62.4 GeV from the STAR experiment

. Phys. Rev. C 107, L061901 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L061901
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24.R. Rapp, J. Wambach,

Chiral symmetry restoration and dileptons in relativistic heavy ion collisions

. Adv. Nucl. Phys. 25, 1 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47101-9_1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25.C. Yang,

The STAR beam energy scan phase II physics and upgrades

. Nucl. Phys. A 967, 800-803 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.05.042
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26.J. Adam, K. Adamczyk, J. Adams, et al.,

Measurement of e+e- momentum and angular distributions from linearly polarized photon collisions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 052302 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.052302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27.M.I. Abdulhamid, B. Aboona, J. Adam, et al.,

Energy dependence of polarized γ→e+e- in peripheral Au+Au collisions at sNN=54.4 and 200 GeV with the STAR experiment at RHIC

. Phys. Rev. C 111, 014909 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.111.014909
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28.R. Arnaldi, K. Banicz, K. Borer, et al.,

Evidence for the production of thermal-like muon pairs with masses above 1 GeV/c2 in 158-A-GeV Indium-Indium Collisions

. Eur. Phys. J. C 59, 607-623 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0857-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29.J. Adamczewski-Musch, et al.,

Probing dense baryon-rich matter with virtual photons

. Nature Phys. 15, 1040-1045 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0583-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30.Y. Han,

Thermal dielectron measurements in Au+Au collisions at sNN=7.7, 14.6, and 19.6 GeV with the STAR experiment

. EPJ Web Conf. 296, 07004 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429607004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31.V. Abgaryan, R. Acevedo Kado, S. Afanasyev, et al.,

Status and initial physics performance studies of the MPD experiment at NICA

. Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 140 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00750-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32.T. Ablyazimov, A. Abuhoza, R. Adak, et al.,

Challenges in QCD matter physics –The scientific programme of the Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR

. Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 60 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12248-y
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33.A. Boehnlein, M. Diefenthaler, N. Sato, et al.,

Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 031003 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34.L.G. Pang, K. Zhou, N. Su, N Su, et al.,

An equation-of-state-meter of quantum chromodynamics transition from deep learning

. Nat. Comm. 9, 210 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02726-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35.W.B. He, Y.G. Ma, L.G. Pang, et al.,

High-energy nuclear physics meets machine learning

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01233-z
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36.W.B. He, Q.F. Li, Y.G. Ma, et al.,

Machine learning in nuclear physics at low and intermediate energies

. SCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 66, 282001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2116-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37.Y.G. Ma, L.G. Pang, R. Wang, et al.,

Phase transition study meets machine learning

. Chinese Phys. Lett. 40, 122101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/40/12/122101
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
38.J. He, W.B. He, Y.G. Ma, et al.,

Machine-learning-based identification for initial clustering structure in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 104, 044902 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.044902
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar