1 Introduction
In the past two decades[1,2,3,4,5,6], fusion fission reactions have been widely employed as a common approach to probing nuclear dissipation properties in fission. Despite the intensive efforts in both experimental analyses and theoretical calculations, the precise magnitude of nuclear friction in fission is still controversial and hotly debated[7,8,9,10,11]. This could come from a number of factors that affect the sensitivity of observables (such as particle multiplicity and evaporation residue cross section) to nuclear dissipation. Consequently, a large uncertainty in the extracted friction strength β is found. To stringently constrain the friction strength, it is urgent to develop new experimental methods and to select a suitable observable.
Different from heavy-ion fusions in which the formed compound nuclei (CNs) have a low excitation energy (<200 MeV) but a high angular momentum (up to 70ћ). In contrast, CNs produced in spallation reactions induced by energetic protons[12,13] have high excitation energy (up to 1 GeV) and low angular momentum. When an excited CN evolves toward scission, light particles are evaporated, yielding a lower excitation energy at scission
Theoretically, we adopt the Langevin model to perform calculation of
2 Brief description of theoretical model
The model used here combines both the Langevin equation with a statistical decay model (CDSM). We refer the reader to Ref.[15] for more details. The dynamic part of CDSM is described by entropy. The one-dimensional overdamped Langevin equation is employed to perform the trajectory calculations:
Here q is the dimensionless fission coordinate and is defined as half the distance between the center of mass of the future fission fragments divided by the radius of the compound nucleus, M is the inertia parameter, and β is the dissipation strength. The temperature in Eq.(1) is denoted by T and
where E* is the total internal energy of the system, and a(q) is deformation-dependent level density parameter, taken from the description by Ignatyuk et al.[18] and calculated using the formula given in Refs.[18,19]. Eq.(2) is constructed from the Fermi-gas expression with a finite-range liquid-drop potential V(q) in the {c, h, αa} parametrization[20,21]. The q-dependent surface, Coulomb, and rotation energy terms are included in the potential V(q).
In the CDSM, light-particle evaporation is coupled to the fission mode by a Monte Carlo procedure. Particle emission width is given by Blan’s formula[22].
The excitation energy at scission
where Ecoll is the kinetic energy of the collective degrees of freedom, and Eevap(tsc) is the energy carried away by all evaporated particles by the scission time tsc. The Eq.(3) has been demonstrated[23] to describe excellently the experimental
The CDSM describes the fission process as follows. At early times, the decay of the system is modelled by means of the Langevin equation. After the fission probability flow over the fission barrier attains its quasistationary value, the decay of the compound system is described by a statistical branch. Prescission particle multiplicities are calculated by counting the number of corresponding evaporated particle events registered in the dynamic and statistical branch of the CDSM. To accumulate sufficient statistics, 107 Langevin trajectories are simulated.
3 Results and discussion
We show in Fig.1
-201305/1001-8042-24-05-021/alternativeImage/1001-8042-24-05-021-F001.jpg)
It is the significant difference in prescission light particles at low and high energy that causes the difference in
Aside from initial excitation energy, the emitted particle number is another important factor that controls the magnitude of
-201305/1001-8042-24-05-021/alternativeImage/1001-8042-24-05-021-F046.jpg)
As seen from the figure, a similar
A heavy nucleus favors particle emission due to a long descent of the decaying system from saddle to scission. Also, the fission lifetime is a function of the fissility, meaning that a change in the fissility parameter can affect the particle multiplicity emitted throughout the fission time scale. Here we survey the influences of the two factors on the sensitivity. Our calculation results are displayed in Fig.3 and Fig.4.
-201305/1001-8042-24-05-021/alternativeImage/1001-8042-24-05-021-F091.jpg)
-201305/1001-8042-24-05-021/alternativeImage/1001-8042-24-05-021-F136.jpg)
We notice from Fig.3 and Fig.4 that under the condition of high energy, while varying the size of a fissioning system and its fissility value can influence the number of different kinds of particles, overall, the significant sensitivity found at high energy remains unchanged.
The insensitivity of
In energetic proton-nucleus reactions, the populated residual nucleus has a distribution in its E*, J, A and Z. As illustration we use the intranuclear cascade model (INCL) to simulate (1 GeV) p+Hg collisions, the results of which are plotted in Fig.5.
The distribution information should be used as input for subsequent Langevin calculation of the formed hot nuclear systems. Thus, for more accurate results, it is necessary to combine the INCL, which treats the collision stage between protons and nuclei in spallation reactions, with Langevin description of fission of excited nuclei. This new approach may offer a more suitable framework to explore
-201305/1001-8042-24-05-021/alternativeImage/1001-8042-24-05-021-F181.jpg)
4 Conclusion
The Langevin model of fission is applied to survey the role of the initial excitation energy E* of Hg CNs in