logo

Low mass vector meson production at forward rapidity in p+p and d+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV from a multiphase transport model

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Low mass vector meson production at forward rapidity in p+p and d+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV from a multiphase transport model

Yi-Fei Xu
Yong-Jin Ye
Jin-Hui Chen
Yu-Gang Ma
Song Zhang
Chen Zhong
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.27, No.4Article number 87Published in print 20 Aug 2016Available online 09 Jul 2016
45200

Low-mass vector meson (ρ, ω, and ϕ) production at forward rapidity in p+p and d+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV is studied within the framework of a multiphase transport model (AMPT). Detailed investigations, including the transverse momentum and the rapidity dependence of low-mass vector meson production in the AMPT model show that the hadron interaction process is important for a quantitative description of the ρ and ω data. But for the ϕ meson, the strange quark production in the AMPT model with the string melting scenario describes the data reasonably well, while the default AMPT model under predicts the data. The N(ϕ)/N(ρ+ω) ratio from the AMPT model with the string melting scenario perfectly describes the data in p+p collisions. For the d+Au collisions, an increased trend of this ratio vs. transverse momentum and the number of participants is observed from the AMPT model. Our results indicate that a precise measurement of the N(ϕ)/N(ρ+ω) ratio in d+Au and Au+Au collisions will shed more light on the strangeness production and its dynamics in Quark Gluon Plasma.

Vector mesonHandron interactionAMPT

1 Introduction

Low-mass vector meson (LVM) production in high energy p+p and d+Au collisions is a useful tool in understanding the dynamics of the hot matter created in the reaction. In p+p collisions, LVM provides data for tuning the event generator inspired by Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and is a good reference for heavy-ion collisions. In heavy-ion collisions, LVM, due to their short lifetime and strong decay in the medium, carry important information on the hot and dense state of matter formed in such collisions [1-6]. Strangeness enhancement [7] is a phenomenon associated with soft particles in bulk matter, which can be studied via ϕ meson production [8-16] and the N(ϕ)/N(ρ+ω) ratio. There are well tuned QCD event generators in p+p collision, such as the PYTHIA [17]. Microscopic transport model calculations including the di-lepton channel, are also available in the literature. For example, the parton-hadron string dynamics (PHSD) covariant transport model [18], which shows a fair agreement with the STAR data [19-21]. We provided another study on LVM production based on a multi-phase transport model (AMPT) and we focused on the forward rapidity region. We found that the N(ϕ)/N(ρ+ω) ratio is sensitive to strange quark dynamics and proposed further experiment measurement on LVM production at froward rapidity in high energy heavy-ion collisions.

The article is organized as follows. Sect. 2 is a brief description of the AMPT model. Section 3 is the results and discussion. A final summary is given in Sect. 4.

2 THE AMPT MODEL

The AMPT model is a hybrid model including the following four main components [22]: the initial condition, the partonic interactions, the conversion from partonic matter into hadronic matter, and the hadronic interactions. The initial condition, which includes the spatial and momentum distributions of minijet partons and soft string excitation, are obtained from the HIJING model [23]. The scatterings among partons are modeled by Zhang’s parton cascade (ZPC) [24], which presently includes only two-body elastic scatterings with cross sections obtained from the pQCD with screening mass. After the freeze-out of partons, two different methods are used in order to describe the conversion from partonic matter into hadronic matter, leading to the two different versions of the AMPT model: 1) the default version and 2) the string-melting version. In the default AMPT model, partons are recombined with their parent strings when they stop the interaction, and the resulting strings are converted to hadrons using a Lund string fragmentation model [25]. In the AMPT model with string melting, a simple quark coalescence model, based on the quark spatial information, is used to combine partons into hadrons. After the hadronization process, in both the default and string-melting versions, the dynamics of the hadronic matter is then described by A Relativistic Transport (ART) model [26]. The details of the AMPT model can be found in Ref. [22]. In the present study, we use the version of AMPT-v1.26-v2.26 with the QCD coupling constant αs = 0.33, and the screening mass μ = 3.2 fm-1 to obtain a parton scattering cross section of 1.5 mb in the ZPC stage. These new parameters, i.e. the coupling constant and the screening mass, will help to describe charged particle multiplicity density and the elliptic flow in heavy-ion collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) [27]. All the other parameters are from the AMPT manual [22].

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Low mass vector meson production in p+p and d+Au collisions

Figure 1 shows the ρ, ω, and ϕ pT spectra from the AMPT model in comparison to the experimental data. From the figure, one can see that the default AMPT model describes the ρ+ω data better than the string melting version, while for the ϕ meson calculation, which was published elsewhere [29], the AMPT with string melting version describes the data better than the default version. The new findings are consistent with our earlier study on mid-rapidity identified particle production in d+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV [30]: the final state interaction in the default AMPT version is important for proton and π production. However, for the ϕ meson, the strangeness production in the string melting version enhance the rate and describes the data better than the pure hadonic phase version.

Fig. 1.
Invariant yields of ρ, ω, and ϕ as a function of pT in p+p collisions at sNN = 200 GeV. Dashed and solid lines represent the results from the AMPT model with string melting scenario and the default version, respectively. Data are results from the PHENIX Collaboration [28].
pic

Figure 2 presents the ρ, ω, and ϕ rapidity in p+p collisions at sNN = 200 GeV. For the (ρ+ω), the default AMPT describes the data well, while the AMPT with string melting version under predicts the data in the full rapidity range. For the ϕ meson, the AMPT model with string melting version does a better job than the default version. This is consistent with the findings from the pT spectra [c.f. Fig. 1].

Fig. 2.
Lines represent the rapidity distributions of ρ, ω, and ϕ in the AMPT model, while this data points result from the PHENIX Collaboration [28].
pic

For a heavy system like d+Au collisions, as shown in Fig.3, the default AMPT model predicts a higher yield for (ρ+ω) than the melting version, while for the ϕ meson, the string melting version, has a higher rate than the default version. In comparison to the available ϕ meson data [31], also discussed in the earlier paper [29], the AMPT model with the string melting version predicts the ϕ meson yield in the d-going direction well, while it slightly under-predicted the high pT yield in the Au-going direction. The reason may be due to the small quark mass used in the model calculation and the particles that are less affected by the radial flow [22]. Future experimental measurement on ρ and ω production will be helpful.

Fig. 3.
Low-mass vector meson pT spectra in forward rapidity d+Au collisions. Lines represent results from the AMPT model calculation, and data points are experiment result on ϕ meson production from the PHENIX Collaboration [31]. The panel (a) and (b) are the results in the d-going and Au-going direction, respectively.
pic
3.2 N(ϕ)/N(ρ+ω) ratio vs. transverse momentum and impact parameter

Figure 4 shows the N(ϕ)/N(ρ+ω) ratio as a function of pT in p+p and d+Au collisions. From the figure, one can see that the AMPT model with the sting melting version (the red solid lines) describes the ratio well in p+p collisions (the blue solid circles), while the default version (the dash blue lines) under-predicts the ratio. It may be due to the enhanced strangeness production in the melting version, while the default version is only involved in the pure hadronic transport process. The ratio from the d+Au collisions shows similar behaviour as observed in p+p system. It will be interesting to see how the data will be in future experiment in future.

Fig. 4.
The particle yield ratio vs. pT. The upper panel is the results of p+p collisions, and the bottom panel represents the calculations in d+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV.
pic

Figure 5 predicts the N(ϕ)/N(ρ+ω) in d+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV. Two different types of collisions were selected for systematic study: the nucleon+Au collision type and the d+Au collision type. One can see that the ratios increase as a function of Npart in low Npart and saturate at certain values of Npart: in the n(p)+Au type collisions, the ratio becomes flat after Npart > 3 while for the d+Au type collisions, the ratio becomes flat after Npart > 5. Future experimented measurements on the ratio may help to pin down the possible difference.

Fig. 5.
The ratio of N(ϕ) vs. N(ρ+ω) as a function of the No. of participant nucleons in d+Au collisions from the AMPT model. The upper figure indicates collision type with one nucleon in the d-going direction, and the lower figure indicates collision type with 2 nucleons.
pic

4 Summary

Low-mass vector meson productions in p+p and d+Au collisions at sNN = 200 GeV are studied within a multiphase transport model. It is found that the pure hadronic scenario of the model describes the ρ+ω data well in p+p collisions, while for the ϕ meson, the string melting version, enhances the strangeness production and shows a fair agreement with the data. Similar behaviours are found in the d+Au collisions. We argued that a measurement of the N(ϕ)/N(ρ+ω) ratio in heavy-ion collisions will bring rich information on the strangeness dynamics. Future experimental effort in this direction is encouraged.

References
[1] I. Arsene et al.,

Quark-gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? The perspective from the BRAHMS experiment

. Nucl. Phys. A, 2005, 757: 1-27. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.130
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] B.B. Back et al.,

The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC

. Nucl. Phys. A, 2005, 757: 28-101. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.084
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] J. Adams et al.,

Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark-gluon plasma: The STAR Collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions

. Nucl. Phys. A, 2005, 757: 102-183. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.085
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] K. Adcox et al.,

Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX Collaboration

. Nucl. Phys. A, 2005, 757: 184-283. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.086
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] F.M. Liu,

Explore QCD phase transition with thermal photons

. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 2013, 24: 050524. doi: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.2013.05.024
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] C.M. Ko, et al.,

Mean-field effects on matter and antimatter elliptic flow

. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 2013, 24: 050525. doi: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.2013.05.025
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] P. Koch, B. Muller, and J. Rafelski,

Strangeness in relativistic heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Rep., 1986, 142: 167. doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(86)90096-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] C. Alt et al.,

Energy dependence of ϕ meson production in central Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=6 to 17 GeV

. Phys. Rev. C, 2008, 78: 044907. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044907
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] B. Alessandro et al.,

ϕ production in Pb-Pb collisions at 158 GeV/c per nucleon incident momentum Phys

. Lett. B, 2003, 555: 147. doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)03267-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] D. Adamova et al.,

Phys

. Rev. Lett., 2006, 96: 152301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.152301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] B. I. Abelev et al.,

Partonic Flow and ϕ-Meson Production in Au+Au Collisions at sNN=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 99: 112301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.112301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] B. I. Abelev et al.,

Measurements of ϕ meson production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)

. Phys. Rev. C, 2009, 79: 064903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064903
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] B. I. Abelev et al.,

Energy and system size dependence of ϕ meson production in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions

. Phys. Lett. B, 2009, 673: 183. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.02.037
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] A. Adare et al.,

Nuclear modification factors of ϕ mesons in d+Au, Cu+Cu, and Au+Au collisions at sNN=200GeV

. Phys. Rev. C, 2011, 83: 024909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.024909
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] J. H. Chen et al.,

Parton distributions at hadronization from bulk dense matter produced in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. C., 2008, 78: 034907. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.034907
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] J. H. Chen et al.,

Elliptic flow of ϕ mesons and strange quark collectivity

. Phys. Rev. C., 2006 74: 064902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.064902
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] T. Sjöstrand, P. Eden, C. Friberg, L. Lönnblad, G. Miu, S. Mrenna, and E. Norrbin,

High-energy-physics event generation with Pythia 6.1. Comput

. Phys. Commun., 2001, 135: 238. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00236-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya,

Hadronic and electromagnetic probes of hot and dense nuclear matter

. Phys. Rep., 1999, 308: 65. doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00028-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] O. Linnyk, W. Cassing, J. Maninen, E. L. Bratkovskaya, and C. M. Ko,

Analysis of dilepton production in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV within the parton-hadron-string dynamics transport approach

. Phys. Rev. C, 2012, 85: 024910. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.024910
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] L. Adamczyk et al.,

Dielectron Mass Spectra from Au+Au Collisions at sNN=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2014, 113: 022301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.022301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] L. Adamczyk et al.,

Measurements of dielectron production in Au + Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV from the STAR experiment

. Phys. Rev. C, 2015, 92: 024912. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.024912
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] Z.W. Lin, C.M. Ko, B.A. Li, B. Zhang and S. Pal,

Multiphase transport model for relativistic heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C, 2005, 72: 064901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.064901
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] X.N. Wang and M. Gyulassy,

HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in pp, pA, and AA collisions

. Phys. Rev. D, 1991, 44: 3501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] B. Zhang,

ZPC 1.0.1: a parton cascade for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions

. Comput. Phys. Commum., 1998, 109: 193. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00010-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman and T. Sjöstrand,

Parton fragmentation and string dynamics

. Phys. Rep., 1983, 97: 31. doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(83)90080-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] B. A. Li and C. M. Ko,

Formation of superdense hadronic matter in high energy heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C, 1995, 52: 2037. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.52.2037
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[27] J. Xu and C.M. Ko,

Triangular flow in heavy ion collisions in a multiphase transport model

. Phys. Rev. C, 2011, 84: 014903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.014903
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[28] A. Adare et al.,

Low-mass vector-meson production at forward rapidity in p+p collisions at sNN=200 GeV

. Phys. Rev. D, 2014, 90: 052002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.052002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[29] Y.J. Ye, J.H Chen, Y.G. Ma, S. Zhang and C. Zhong,

ϕ-meson production at forward/backward rapidity in high-energy nuclear collisions from a multiphase transport model

. Phys. Rev. C, 2016, 93: 044904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044904
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[30] X.P. Zhang, J.H. Chen, Z.Z. Ren et al.,

Effect of final state interactions on particle production in d+Au collisions at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

. Phys. Rev. C, 2011, 84: 031901(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.031901
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[31] A. Adare et al.,

ϕ meson production in d+Au collisions at sNN=200GeV

. Phys. Rev. C, 2015, 92: 044909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.044909
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar