logo

Radionuclides in primary coolant of a fluoride salt-cooled high-temperature reactor during normal operation

NUCLEAR ENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

Radionuclides in primary coolant of a fluoride salt-cooled high-temperature reactor during normal operation

Guo-Qing Zhang
Shuai Wang
Hai-Qing Zhang
Xing-Wang Zhu
Chao Peng
Jun Cai
Zhao-Zhong He
Kun Chen
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.28, No.3Article number 41Published in print 01 Mar 2017Available online 17 Feb 2017
47602

The release of fission products from coated particle fuel to primary coolant, as well as the activation of coolant and impurities, were analysed for a fluoride salt-cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR) system, and the activity of radionuclides accumulated in the coolant during normal operation was calculated. The release rate (release fraction per unit time) of fission products was calculated with STACY code, which is modelled mainly based on the Fick’s law, while the activation of coolant and impurities was calculated with SCALE code. The accumulation of radionuclides in the coolant has been calculated with a simplified model, which is generally a time integration considering the generation and decay of radionuclides. The results show that activation products are the dominant gamma source in the primary coolant system during normal operation of the FHR while fission products become the dominant source after shutdown. In operation condition, health-impacts related nuclides such as 3H, and 14C originate from the activation of lithium and coolant impurities including carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. According to the calculated effective cross sections of neutron activation, 6Li and 14N are the dominant 3H production source and 14C production source, respectively. Considering the high production rate, 3H and 14C should be treated before being released to the environment.

Source termFHRPrimary coolantFick’s lawDiffusion

1 Introduction

The concept of FHR was first proposed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in 2003 [1]. FHR makes use of triple-isotropic (TRISO) coated particle fuel [2] developed originally for high temperature reactors, and fluoride salt coolant (chemical composition: 2LiF-BeF2). At the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics (SINAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences, a test pebble-bed FHR is now under development [3]. The test reactor has a designed thermal power of 10 MWth, and it is molten-salt cooled and graphite moderated. General design parameters of the test FHR are listed in Table 1.

Table 1:
General parameters of the test FHR developed at SINAP
Item Specification
Power 10 MWth
Coolant 2LiF-BeF2
Loading of coolant 2.6 t
Abundance of 7Li in the coolant 99.99%
Moderator & reflector Graphite
Maximum loading of pebbles 14650
Fuel kernel temperature 600 to 700 oC
Show more

The pebble fuel used in the test FHR makes use of the TRISO particle (Fig. 1) which consists of a UO2 fuel kernel within multiple coating layers to prevent the leakage of radioactive materials at temperatures up to 1600 oC [4]. In fuel pebbles, TRISO particles distribute in the graphite matrix inside a 0.5 cm thick graphite shell. The pebble has a diameter of 6 cm and a uranium loading of 7 g with the 235U enrichment of 17.08%. In the fuel region, pebbles are uniformly (randomly) collocated. The primary coolant system of the test FHR has a cover gas system to remove gaseous and volatile fission products from coolant. In each refueling cycle, the reactor is designed to be operated for 250 full power days (FPDs).

Figure 1:
TRISO coated particle (bottom) and fuel pebble (top) [5]
pic

Since the design of the test FHR is different from traditional light water reactors or high temperature reactors, the migration behaviour of radionuclides in the reactor system needs to be investigated to understand the insight of the release mechanisms of radionuclides to the reactor subsystems and to the environment.

2 Origins of Radionuclides

Radionuclides in test FHR system are mainly from fission reactions and neutron activations of coolant and structural materials. Fission products such as iodine, noble gases, and some metallic fission products could come out of fuel pebbles and go into the primary coolant through diffusion and leaking processes. The activation of coolant itself and impurities could also produce radionuclides such as 3H, 14C, 16N, 19O, 20F, etc. in the coolant system. In addition, activation products of corroded-off Hastelloy-N also exist in the primary coolant system (not being analysed in this work, see Ref. [6] for details).

2.1 Fission Products

The SiC layer of the TRISO particle provides retention to fission products both in operation and in accident. However, fission products could still penetrate the coating layer by diffusion or release caused by coating failure. Besides, uranium contamination outside the coating during manufacturing is another dominant source of raidonuclides release.

The diffusion of radionuclides can be modelled with physical laws [7], namely the conservation of mass and the Fick’s law.

The conservation of mass can be expressed with the following formula

V(pλcct)dV=SjdS, (1)

where V is volume, S is surface area, p is volume specific generation rate, λ is decay constant, c is nuclide concentration, and j is transport flux through outer surfaces.

The diffusion flux and time-dependent change of concentration can be described with the Fick’s law [8] in spherical coordinates as shown below

ct=D(2cr2+1rcr)λc+Q, (2)

where c is nuclide concentration, D is diffusion coefficient, r is position or radius, λ is decay constant, and Q is fission production rate.

At the surface of the fuel pebble, the boundary condition can be described as [7]

Dcr|r=rs=β(cblccl), (3)

where rs is radius of the pebble, β is mass transfer coefficient from the surface to the coolant, cbl is concentration in the coolant right above the surface of the pebble, an ccl is the mean concentration in the coolant.

The diffusion of fission products is a structure dependent process, and effective diffusion coefficients have been applied with the Fick’s law to describe the overall diffusion process [7].

In the Jülich Research Center, Germany, the STACY code [9] was developed to model the diffusion behaviour in coated particles and fuel pebbles and to estimate the release rate and fraction of fission products. The failed fuel particles are treated as bare UO2 kernel, while uranium contamination is directly in the graphite matrix. Free evaporation assumption (β→∞) is applied to account for the release rate from fuel surface to the coolant.

2.2 Activation Products

The chemical components of coolant salt, 6Li, 7Li, and 19F could be activated by neutrons through reactions including 6Li(n, α)3H, 7Li(n, nα)3H, 19F(n, γ)20F, 19F(n, α)16N, and 19F(n, p)19O. Activation products of salt include 3H and short-lived nuclides, such as 16N, 19O, and 20F, which will decay and emit gammas. For example, 20F emits gammas of 1.64 MeV, 2.2 MeV and 2.45 MeV [10] while 16N emits gammas of 6.13 MeV and 4.12 MeV [11]. 20F and 16N have short half lives of about 10 seconds while it is about 30 s for 19O.

During manufacturing of the coolant salt, impurities including carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen could be introduced. The reactions of coolant impurities activation include 13C(n, γ)14C, 14N(n, p)14C, and 13C(n, α)14C.

The activation of those impurities could produce a certain amount of 14C, which would exist mostly in the chemical form of oxides, oxycarbides and so on [12].

3 Accumulation in Primary Coolant

During operation of the reactor, fission products continually enter the primary coolant. Among those fission products, noble gases, iodine, and some metallic fission products could come out the SiC shell of fuel particles. Using the German code STACY, the release rate of fission products could be calculated according to the reactor operation conditions.

On a conservative basis, an assumption was made that radionuclides reach their maximum activities at the beginning of the refueling cycle and remain unchanged. Thus, radionulcides release from fuels with a constant activity per unit time.

The dynamic accumulation process of radionuclides in the primary coolant includes the release of fuel elements, the leak of primary coolant system, and the removal of purification system. A simplified model has been applied to estimate the maximum amount of radionuclide accumulated in the primary coolant system without considering leak and removal mechanism. Based on the release, rate the activities of radionuclides released into the primary coolant can be calculated with the following equation:

A0(t)=c0teλ0(tτ)dτ=cλ0(1eλ0t), (4)

where A0(t) is activity of parent nuclide in the coolant, c is activity of nuclide released to the coolant per unit time, λ0 = decay constant of nuclide, and t is release duration.

Several nuclides, such as 85mKr, 133mXe, and 135mXe, produce 85Kr, 133Xe, and 135Xe through decay, and the daughter nuclides decay, too. The radioactivity of daughter nuclides can be calculated with the following equation:

A1(t)=0tλ1f1A0(τ)eλ1(tτ)dτ=0tλ1f1cλ0(1eλ0τ)eλ1(tτ)dτ=cf1λ0(1eλ1t)λ1λ0cf1λ1λ0(eλ0teλ1t), (5)

where A1(t) is activity of first generation daughter nuclide in the coolant, f1 is decay fraction of parent nuclide to daughter nuclide, and λ1 is decay constant of daughter nuclide.

133I and 135I produce Xe-133m and 135mXe while 133mXe and 135mXe produce 133Xe and 135Xe by decay. The radioactivity of second-generation daughter nuclides can be calculated with the following equation:

pic (6)

where A2(t) is activity of the second generation daughter nuclide in the coolant, f2 is decay fraction of first generation daughter nuclide to second generation daughter nuclide, and λ2 is decay constant of second generation daughter nuclide.

4 Results and Discussions

4.1 Results

After 250 FPDs, calculated inventory of key radionuclides, that could be potentially released from fuel pebbles, in the fuels are listed in Table 2. The calculations were performed using TRITON and ORIGEN-S modules of SCALE 6.1 package [13].

Table 2:
Inventory of key radionuclides at the end of refueling cycle, 250 FPDs
Nuclides Activity (Bq) Nuclides Activity (Bq)
3H 1.29×1012 131I 9.24×1015
83mKr 1.62×1015 132I 1.39×1016
85Kr 4.12×1013 133I 2.11×1016
85mKr 3.77×1015 134I 2.44×1016
87Kr 7.68×1015 135I 1.97×1016
88Kr 1.03×1016 131mXe 1.01×1014
89Sr 1.38×1016 133Xe 2.02×1016
90Sr 3.00×1014 133mXe 6.16×1014
134Cs 7.20×1013 135Xe 7.68×1015
137Cs 3.16×1014 135mXe 3.98×1015
88Rb 1.04×1016    
Show more

TRITON produced problem dependent burn-up library for the test FHR, and ORIGEN-S has been used to calculate inventory and for activation analysis.

STACY codes have been used to calculate the release rate (Table 3) according to the design parameters of the test FHR. The calculated release rate is a sum of effects including diffusion, coating failure, and uranium contamination. Effective diffusion coefficients of cesium, stronium, silver, and noble gases are taken from Ref. [7, 14]. For those nuclides lacking diffusion coefficients, the data of chemically similar nuclides have been applied. For example, the diffusion coefficients of cesium was used for rubidium. Since the pebble fuel produced in China, which was originally developed for high temperature gas-cooled demonstration reactor, is planned to be used in the test FHR. For the amount of uranium contamination (5.0×10-6) and the particle failure rate (6.0×10-5) refer to the data of HTR-10 and HTR-PM fuel elements (Ref. [15, 16]).

Table 3:
Calculated release rate
Nuclide Half-live Release rate (s-1)
83mKr 1.83 h 5.28×10-10
85Kr 10.76 a 7.45×10-13
85mKr 4.48 h 2.17×10-10
87Kr 76.3 min 7.58×10-10
88Kr 2.80 h 1.30×10-11
131mXe 12.0 d 4.66×10-12
133Xe 5.29 d 9.26×10-12
133mXe 2.2 d 2.02×10-11
135Xe 9.17 h 1.07×10-10
135mXe 15.3 min 3.75×10-9
131I 8.04 d 6.49×10-12
132I 2.38 h 4.07×10-10
133I 20.8 h 4.85×10-11
134I 52.0 min 1.11×10-9
135I 6.59 h 1.49×10-10
134Cs 2.06 a 2.10×10-14
137Cs 30.1 a 2.03×10-14
88Rb 17.8 min 5.59×10-13
89Sr 50.5 d 1.37×10-17
90Sr 28.5 a 1.36×10-17
110mAg 250.4 d 1.36×10-13
Show more

Based on the results shown in Table 2 and Table 3, the activity of radionuclides released from fuel pebbles to the coolant can be calculated with Eq. (4), Eq. (5), and Eq. (6). After 250 full power days, the amount of fission products are listed in Table 4.

Table 4:
Fission products accumulated in primary coolant system (250 FPDs)
Category Nuclide Activity (Bq)
Noble Gases 83mKr 8.13×109
  85Kr 8.24×108
  85mKr 1.91×1010
  87Kr 3.86×1010
  88Kr 1.95×109
  131mXe 1.37×109
  133Xe 2.37×1011
  133mXe 3.61×109
  135Xe 1.60×1011
  135mXe 3.63×1010
Iodine 131I 6.01×1010
  132I 6.94×1010
  133I 1.11×1011
  134I 1.21×1011
  135I 1.01×1011
Metallic fission products 134Cs 2.72×107
  137Cs 1.32×108
  88Rb 8.95×106
  89Sr 1.16×106
  90Sr 8.78×104
  110mAg 7.59×105
Show more

Based on the experiences of MSRE, 100% of noble gases, 10% of iodine, and 10% of solid fission products (such as metallic fission products) would be released from the salt [17], and the rest of the nuclides remain in the primary coolant. Noble gases are in the form of elementary gases. Iodine after released from the salt is in the form of iodine ion or I2, and metallic fission products are in the form of the fluorides [18].

Activation products of coolant and impurities are shown in Table 5. In the calculation, the contents of nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen impurities were selected as 100 ppm wt according to reactor design requirements.

Table 5:
Activities of activation products in primary coolant system (250 FPDs)
Nuclides Activity (Bq)
3H 1.73×1015
14C 2.87×1010
16N 2.95×1015
19O 2.44×1014
20F 1.15×1016
Show more
4.2 Discussions

During operation of the reactor, the activity of activation products in the primary coolant system is several orders of magnitude higher than that of fission products (Table 4 and Table 5). As shown in Fig. 2, gammas are mainly from activation products, and those short-lived activation products (16N, 20F) emitting high energy gammas should be considered in shielding design work of the test FHR. After shutdown, short-lived nuclides decay quickly and disappear shortly, while the activity of long-lived nuclides decreases slowly.

Figure 2:
Gamma flux spectra of radionuclides in primary coolant at the end of the refueling cycle (250 FPDs)
pic

Among those radionuclides accumulated in the primary coolant system, the release of 3H and 14C need to be paid more attention during normal operation as they can be released to the environment and result in exposure to surrounding residents through ground-shine, immersion, and food chain. 3H production rate of the test FHR is about 0.69 TBq/MWd while it is about 0.05 TBq/MWd for CANDU 6 reactor [19]. 14C production rate of the test FHR is about 1.15×107 Bq/MWd. Normalized to 3000 MWth, both 3H and 14C produced in the test FHR exceed the release limits in "Regulations for environmental radiation protection of nuclear power plant" (GB 6249-2011). Therefore, treatment of 3H and 14C should be considered.

3H originates mainly from the activation of 6Li and 7Li [20]. According to the results in Table 6, which were calculated according to the neutron spectrum of the test FHR obtained with Monte Carlo simulation, 3H production cross section of 6Li is about 2.0×105 times higher than that of 7Li. Although the amount of 6Li in the coolant is much lower (Table 1), it is still the dominant 3H production source. 14C has several sources including the activation of 13C, 14N, and 17O. Since the cross section of 14N(n,p)14C is the highest, it is the dominant source of 14C.

Table 6:
Effective cross section of neutron activation reactions in the test FHR coolant
Reaction Cross section (barns)
6Li(n,α)3H 1.82×102
7Li(n,nα)3H 9.10×10-4
13C(n,γ)14C 3.13×10-4
14N(n,p)14C 3.55×10-1
17O(n,α)14C 5.39×10-2
Show more

5 Conclusion

The amount of radionuclides accumulated in the primary coolant system of a test FHR has been analysed in this work. The release of fission products from fuel elements to the coolant system were considered, as well as the neutron activation of the coolant itself and impurities. A simplified model, which did not take leak and removal mechanism into account, was used to account for the decay and accumulation of released radionuclides. According to the analysis, several conclusions could be made as follows:

1. During operation, short-lived activation products of the coolant are a much stronger radiation source than fission products.

2. 3H and 14C originate from the activation of coolant and impurities, respectively. Because of their high specific production rates, 3H and 14C should be treated and monitored before being released to the environment in order to comply with the regulation of authorities.

3. 6Li in the coolant of the test FHR is a dominant 3H production source. Efforts should be made to reduce the content of 6Li to avoid high production rate of 3H.

4. 14N could be introduced in to the coolant during manufacturing; it is should be reduced as it is the dominant 14C production source.

This work is to give a first glimpse of the radionuclides migration mechanism in a pebble-bed FHR system. Since simplified models and assumptions were applied, further investigation has to be made theoretically and experimentally to gain additional insights.

References
[1] C.W. Forsberg, P.F. Peterson, P.S. Pickard.

Molten-salt-cooled advanced high-temperature reactor for production of hydrogen and electricity

. Nucl Technol, 2003, 144: 289-302. DOI: 10.13182/NT03-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] M.J. Wang, R.J. Sheu, J.J. Peir, et al.

Criticality calculations of the HTR-10 pebble-bed reactor with SCALE6/CSAS6 and MCNP5

. Ann Nucl Energy, 2014, 64: 1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.09.031
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] M.D. Mei, S.W. Shao, Z.Z. He, et al.

Research on initial event analysis for solid thorium molten salt reactor probabilistic safety assessment

. Nucl Tech, 2014, 37: 090601. DOI: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2014.hjs.37.090601
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] K. Verfondern, H. Nabielek, J.M. Kendall.

Coated Particle Fuel For High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors

. Nucl Eng Technol, 2007, 39: 603-616. DOI: 10.5516/NET.2007.39.5.603
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] C. Yang, C. Fang, J. Zhang, et al.

Study on cumulative fractional release of radionuclides in HTGR fuel particles

. Acta Phys Sin, 2014, 63: 032802. DOI: 10.7498/aps.63.032802
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] C. Peng, X.W. Zhu, G.Q. Zhang, et al. Numerical Analysis of the Activity of Irradiated Alloy-N in TMSR-SF1, accepted to be published in Nuclear Science and Techniques,

2015.
[7] K. Verfondern, H. Nabielek. FRESCO-II Verification and Validation. Research Center Jülich, FZJ-IEK6-D-CC-02-Rev3, 2012.
[8] J. Crank. The Mathematics of Diffusion. 2nd Ed, New York (USA): Oxford University Press, 1975.
[9] A. Xhonneux, H.J. Allelein.

Development of an integrated fission product release and transport code for spatially resolved full-core calculations of V/HTRs

. Nucl Eng Des, 2014, 271: 361-369. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.11.063
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] J.V. Jelley.

The Radioactivity of Fluorine 20

. P Phys Soc A, 63: 538-539, 1950.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] D.E. Alburgek.

Beta Decay of N-16

. Phys Rev, 1958, 111: 1586-1590. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.111.1586
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] X.W. Zhu, S. Wang, C. Peng, et al.

Production and release of 14C in TMSR-SF1

. Nucl Tech, 2015, 38: 030603. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2015.hjs.38.030603
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] ORNL.

Scale: A Comprehensive Modelling and Simulation Suite for Nuclear Safety Analysis and Design

. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/TM-2005/39, 2011.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] IAEA, Fuel Performance and Fission Product Behaviour in Gas Cooled Reactors. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-TECDOC-978, 1997.
[15] J.Z. Cao, S.R. Xi.

Study on Retaining Performance of Fuel Element and Coated Particles to Fission Products in HTGR

. Nucl Power Eng, 1999, 20: 440-443.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] X.W. Zhou, Z.M. Lu, J. Zhang, et al.

Research and Manufacture of Spherical Fuel Element for HTR-PM Demonstration Project

. Atom Energy Sci Tech, 2014, 48: 1228-1233. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2014.48.07.1228
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] S.E. Beall, P.N. Haubenreich, R.B. Lindauer, et al.

MSRE Design and Operations Report Part V - Reactor Safety Analysis Report, ORNL-TM 0732

, 1964.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] E.L. Compere, S.S. Kirslis, E.G. Bohlmann, et al.

Fission Product Behaviour in the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment, ORNL-4865

, 1975.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] J. Zhang, H.W. Li.

Analysis of effluence tritium release from Qinshan Phase III heavy water reactor

. Radiat Prot, 2009, 29:80-85.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] C. Peng, X.W. Zhu, G.Q. Zhang, et al.

Comparison among SCALE packages applied to the analysis of trium in an FHR

. Nucl Tech, 2015, 38:080601. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2015.hjs.38.080601
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar