logo

Design and calculation of a side-coupled accelerating structure

LOW ENERGY ACCELERATOR, RAY AND APPLICATIONS

Design and calculation of a side-coupled accelerating structure

Ming-Xuan Liu
Cong-Feng Wu
Yun-Gai Tang
Gui-Rong Huang
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.28, No.11Article number 160Published in print 01 Nov 2017Available online 26 Oct 2017
36600

In this paper we presents the design and optimization of a side-coupled accelerating structure with an energy switch. The beam parameters are optimized, and the electric field asymmetry in the first cell is analyzed. The new structure we designed has an improvement of 10 times in the accelerating field symmetry. Thermo-mechanical analysis is performed based on the electromagnetic results. The highest temperature is 72.5°C at the nose cone and the maximal deformation is 73 μm at the outer edge of the coupling cavity.

Side-coupled accelerating structureenergy switchBeam dynamicsAsymmetryThermo-mechanical analysis

1 Introduction

Linac has been widely used for cancer treatment. In China, Tsinghua University and the Beijing Medical Equipment Institute (BMEI) completed an 8–10 MeV traveling-wave linac for medical application in 1998 [1]. And efforts have been made by other groups to produce medical accelerators. According to the World Health Organization, up to 4000 sets of medical accelerators are needed in China[2].

Low-energy linac can treat 85% of the tumors which need radiotherapy. In most cases, electron beams of different energies are required to treat tumors at different depths. This is achieved by an energy-switch placed in a side cavity. By changing the device position in the cavity, one can change the field distribution in the accelerating tube[3]. Considering high shunt impedance, good stability and small size, side-coupled accelerating structure is a good candidate for medical use[4]. We designed a side-coupled accelerating structure with an energy switch. According to Ref.[5], The final energies were 6 and 4 MeV. 3D CST microwave studio (MWS)[6] was used for designing the models, and ASTRA[7] for simulation of beam dynamics. The design requirements are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Design requirements
Parameters Values
Frequency (MHz) 2998
Coupling coefficient (%) 3.5
Initial energy (keV) 10
Final energy (MeV) 6 or 4
RMS beam diameter (mm) <2
Show more

For side-coupled accelerating structure, the coupling cavity is placed alternately between two accelerating cavities with a magnetic coupling[8]. Due to asymmetry of the structure, the accelerating field will offset from the centerline resulting in an asymmetric electric field. Especially for electrons of low energies, the electric field symmetry in the first cell is essential. Based on Ref.[9], we conducted the calculation and improved the structure symmetry.

RF heating should be considered too. The considerable energy dissipation from the nose cones may induce a remarkable temperature rise, causing dangerous thermo-mechanical stress due to the non-uniform temperature distribution[10]. To evaluate this important issue, we performed the thermo-mechanical analysis by ANSYS Workbench[11].

2 Accelerating structure

The compact side-coupled linac is operated on π/2 mode. It consists of seven accelerating cavities and six coupling cavities. Fig. 1 shows the models of accelerating and coupling cavities with their optimized longitudinal electric field.

Fig. 1
Models of accelerating (a) and coupling cavities and their longitudinal electric field curves.
pic

To accelerate electrons continuously, the length of each cavity must be βλ/2, where λ is the RF wavelength and β = v/c is electron traveling speed over light speed. The accelerating cavity is 50 mm long, while ones of two bunching cavities are 21 and 45 mm respectively. In order to maximize electric field at the electron bunch entrance, the first accelerating cavity was designed as half-cavity structure. Except the first cell, each accelerating cavity is of a Ω-shape, with a nose cone angle of 20°. The accelerating cavity hole is 4 mm in radius. To meet the requirements of mechanical strength and heat exchange, the web thickness is 3 mm. To get high shunt impendence and Q factor, key parameters of the nose cone are optimized. Resonant frequency of the cavity is fixed at 2998±0.5 MHz [12]. The effective shunt impedance of each accelerating cavity is ~100 MΩ/m, and the Q factor of 18730 and R/Q = 456. At the nose cone, the surface electric field reaches to s maximized at Emax/Eaverage = 4, where Eaverage is the average electric field on the axis.

In placing coupling cavities on accelerating cavities, the side-coupled structure operating on π/2 mode will introduce two periodic units (ACA and CAC, A denotes accelerating cavity and C denotes coupling cavity). The frequency gap of the two units on π/2 mode is named as stop band. To ensure the whole tube to operate on π/2 mode, the geometries of ACA and CAC must be adjusted to make the stop band as small as possible[13-15]. The resonant frequency of an optimized accelerating cavity and coupling cavity should be 3021.2 MHz and 3076.9 MHz, respectively, when the coupling coefficient is 3.5%. With coupling slots, the effective shunt impedance of the accelerating cavity will decrease by 3%.

Bi-periodic system has large frequency spaces between operating mode and the adjacent modes[13]. Fig. 2(a) shows the resonant mode (π/2 mode) of the ACA unit. It can be seen that, on π/2 mode, there is only little electric field exiting around the coupling slot in the side cavity. The phase shift between two adjacent accelerating cavities is π. Fig.2(b) shows the model of the whole accelerating cavity.

Fig. 2
Electric field profiles of the resonant mode (a) and the whole accelerating tube (b)
pic

3 Beam dynamics

Two samples of energy switch are shown in Fig. 3. By moving the plunger (s), one can make the coupling unsymmetrical, hence the reduction or increase of electric field downstream. We chose the switch with one plunger[16]. The switch was placed in the fourth coupling cavity.

Fig. 3
Schematics of the energy switch.
pic

To calculate the beam dynamics, we converted the accelerating field (calculated by CST) into ASTRA format as its input field file. The effect of space charge was considered in the simulation process. A total of 10000 macro particles were used for initial simulations. After scanning all the parameters, full beam dynamics simulation was carried out with 1000000 ASTRA macro particles. The electrons were assumed to be generated from a DC gun. The transverse distribution was radially Gaussian with beam spot size of Φ1 mm (RMS). The longitudinal distribution was uniform with bunch length of 0.7 ns. The initial energy spread and normalized emittance were assumed to be 0.5% and 1.0 π·mm·mrad, respectively [17-19].

Fig. 4(a) shows the field distributions on the axis when the plunger is 5.21 mm or 7.91 mm long. At the two positions of the energy switch, the resonant frequencies of the whole structure have a difference of 0.41 MHz. The energy growth curves are shown in Fig. 4(b), and the beam sizes at the end of linac are shown in Fig.4(c). Using the electric field (Fig. 4, upper parts), the electrons can be accelerated from 10 keV to 6081 keV with an average electric field strength of 23.8 MV/m. At the end of accelerating tube, the RMS beam diameter is about 1.42 mm, and the RMS energy spread is 242.7 keV. Using the electric field (Fig. 4, lower parts), the final energy is 4001 keV, with a 0.4-mm increase in RMS beam diameter (which still meets the design requirements) and RMS energy spread of 152.7 keV.

Fig. 4
Longitudinal electric fields of the accelerating tube (a), energy growth curves (b) and RMS beam bunch diameters (b) at different positions of energy switch.
pic

4 Asymmetry analysis

To reduce its electric field asymmetry, the first cavity uses coaxial coupling instead. As shown in Fig. 5, by enlarging the regions of the coupling cavity near the outer and inner radii, the magnetic energy is concentrated in the outer and inner regions and the electric energy in the middle region[20]. Coupling is accomplished through a pair of coupling slots 180° apart cut into the web. This preserves symmetry about the beam axis, and minimizes the beam perturbation. Further, by rotating the coupling slots 90° at each half of accelerating cavity, the coupling slots are at maximum separation, thereby further reducing the direct coupling between accelerating cavities through the slots.

Fig. 5
Model of the coaxial coupling cavity (a) and electric field distribution in the cavity (b)
pic

The longitudinal electric field, which may be expanded into monopole and multi-poles, can be expressed as[21]:

EZ=EZ,0+xΔEd-average/(2b), (1)

where b is the bore radius, and ΔEd-average /(2b) is the average amplitude gradient of the dipole electric field. The dipole contribution can be quantified as:

ΔEdEZ=|EZ(x=b)||EZ(x=b)||EZ(x=0,y=0)|. (2)

We calculated ΔEd/EZ of the former structure and the modified it at b=4 mm above and below the axis. The results are shown in Fig. 6. For the former structure, ΔEd/EZ = 0.698%, while it is 0.075% for the optimized structure, i.e. a 10-times improvement in asymmetry of electric field.

Fig. 6
Symmetry of the prior (a) and modified (b) structures.
pic

5 Thermo-mechanical analysis

Due to power dissipation in the wall, the structure material is heated by the electromagnetic field. This has a strong impact on the mechanical properties and leads to structure deformation. The loss density (W/m2) coming from metallic losses can be expressed by: [22]

PL=RS2|Ht|2ds, (3)

where, PL is the average surface power loss, RS is the surface resistance, and Ht is the tangential magnetic field.

We used HFSS module in ANSYS Workbench to calculate the electromagnetic field of one periodic unit (CAC) with copper as the wall material. Then, the electromagnetic results were used to calculate the surface power distribution. The thermo-mechanical analysis was performed assuming an infinite sequence of accelerating cavities with a boundary condition of perfect insulation[23]. The usual air convection cooling was taken into account. The duty cycle was 2%, and the mesh size of the thermo-mechanical analysis was about 80 000 elements.

The thermo-mechanical analysis results are shown in Fig. 7. The maximum temperature at the nose cone is 72.5°C.High initial stress is produced at the nose cone and the web where the heat flows away difficultly. Deformation is proportional to the distance to the axis. Maximal deformation of about 73 μm occurs at the outer edge of coupling cavity.

Fig. 7
Thermo-mechanical analysis results.
pic

6 Conclusion

The physical calculation and design of a side-coupled accelerating structure have been done. An optimized geometry with high shunt impedance and Q factor was obtained. With the energy switch, the electrons could be accelerated from 10 keV to 6081 keV or 4001 keV. The beam characteristics met the design requirements. The accelerating field symmetry in the first cavity was studied, and an optimal design with symmetry improvement of about 10 times was obtained. The thermo- mechanical analysis results of the temperature, equivalent stress and deformation distributions provide estimation for future cooling system.

References
1. Y.Z. Lin.

Low energy electron linacs and their applications in China

. Proceeding of the Asian Particle Accelerator Conference. Tsukuba, Japan, Mar.23-27 (1998)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. R.Y. Song, S.B. He, P. Wang.

Development of a 14-MeV dual-mode congeneric mid-energy accelerating structure for medical electron linear accelerator

. Nucl. Tech.. 39, 050203.1-050203.6 (2016). doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2016.hjs.39.050203 (in Chinese)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. S. Hanna.

TUPP117: Review of energy variation approaches in medical accelerators

, Proceedings of EPAC08, Genoa, Italy, Jun.23-27 (2008)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. E.A. Knapp, B.C. Knapp, J.M. Potter.

Standing wave high energy Linear accelerator structures

. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 39, 979-991 (1968). doi: 10.1063/1.1683583
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. X.Q. Lin, P. Zhou, H.B. Zhao et al.

Development of side coupled standing wave acceleration tube with energy switch

. The 7th National Symposium on Medical Accelerator, Tsingtao, China, Sept.25-28 (2006) (in Chinese)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6.

CST (Computer Simulation Technology)

, http://www.cst.com
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. K. Floettmann.

ASTRA (A Space Charge Tracking Algorithm)

, http://www.desy.de/~mpyflo
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. D. E. Nagle, E. A. Knapp, B. C. Knapp.

Coupled resonator model for standing wave accelerator tanks

. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 38, 1583-1587 (1967). doi: 10.1063/1.1720608
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. E. Tanabe. US Patent 631 6876,

High gradient, compact, standing wave linear accelerator structure

. (2001)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. S.S. Kurennoy, S. Konecni, J.F. O'Hara, et al.

THPP027: Heating and stress in the lansce side-coupled linac RF cavities

. Proceedings of EPAC08, Genoa, Italy, Jun. 23-27. (2008)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11.

ANSYS Workbench

, http://www.ansys.com
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. S. Zarei, F.D. Abbasi, S. Ahmadiannamin, et al.

THPRI040: Study of geometrical parameters and their tolerance in optimization of accelerating cells of side coupled linac

. Proceedings of IPAC2014, Dresden, Germany, Jun.15-20 (2014)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. T. Nishikawa, S. Giordano, D. Carter.

Dispersion relation and frequency characteristics of alternating periodic structure for linear accelerators

. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 37, 652-661, (1966). doi: 10.1063/1.1720274
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. H.C. Hoyt, D.D. Simmonds, W.F. Rich.

Computer designed 805 MHz proton Linac cavities

. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 37, 755-762 (1966). doi: 10.1063/1.1720315
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. X.H. Bian, H.B. Chen, S.X. Zheng.

Calculation of coupling factor for double-period accelerating structure

. High Energy Physics and Nuclear Physics 29, 900-902, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-3052.2005.09.015 (2005). (in Chinese)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. E. Tanabe, V.A. Vaguine. US Patent 428 6192

Variable energy standing wave linear accelerator structure

. (1981)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. R. Dash, A. Sharma and K. C. Mittal.

Beam dynamics studies of a 10 MeV standing wave electron linac

, 2014 International Symposium on Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, Mumbai, India (2014) doi: 10.1109/DEIV.2014.6961756
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. N. Juntong, R. Chimchang, S. Rimjaem, et al.

TUPOY015: Design of electron gun and S-band structure for medical electron Linear accelerator

. Proceeding of IPAC16, Busan, Korea, May 8-13. (2016)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. P. Buaphad, H.K. Cha, S. Cha, et al.

TUPOY010: 6/9 MeV S-band standing wave accelerating structure for container X-ray inspection system at RTX

. Proceeding of IPAC16, Busan, Korea, May 8-13. (2016)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. E. Tanabe, M. Bayer, M.E. Trail. U.S. Patent 498 8919,

Small-diameter standing-wave linear accelerator structure

. (1991)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. M.D. Forno, P. Craievich, G. Penco, et al.

Theoretical and experimental analysis of a linear accelerator endowed with single feed coupler with movable short-circuit

. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84: 114701.1-114701.10 (2013). doi: 10.1063/1.4827080
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. A. Mahmoud, E.L. Sabbagh.

Electromagnetic-Thermal analysis study based on HFSS-ANSYS link

. Syracuse University. (2011)http://surface.syr.edu/eecs_techreports/46
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. D. Giove.

Low energy high power side coupled linac optimization

. Proceedings of PAC09, Vancouver, Canada, May 4-8. (2009)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar