logo

Determination of sedimentation rates in Izmir Bay using 210Pb radionuclide

NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE

Determination of sedimentation rates in Izmir Bay using 210Pb radionuclide

Mutlu İçhedef
Güngör Yener
Hasan Baha Büyükişik
Ebru Yeşim Köksal
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.28, No.11Article number 168Published in print 01 Nov 2017Available online 30 Oct 2017
34600

In this study, using the constant rate of supply model (CRS), sedimentation rates of Izmir Bay were calculated and discussed. For this purpose, eight sediment cores were collected from inner part of the bay and sedimentation rates were calculated from vertical distribution of 210Pb. 210Pb activities were determined indirectly from 210Po activities. Sedimentation rates ranged from 0.10 to 0.52 cm·y−1. The highest sedimentation rates were determined in stations close to the Poligon Stream. It was concluded that main transporting mechanism for sediments is river and streams in the area. In addition, sediment cores taken from the harbor were mixed due to bioturbation, water circulation and/or other factors.

Sedimentation ratesİzmir Bay210Pb210Po.

1. Introduction

Marine sediments and sedimentation rates have been investigated for decades [17], for establishment of chronologies, development of history of erosion and pollution, investigations of ecological and coastal management. Madsen et al. [8] reported that sedimentation rates give information about present trends on the sea level changes. Thus, estimates of mass accumulation rate (MAR) and sedimentation rate (SR) are useful to understanding sediment routes. The main sources of sedimentation are the movement of particles. This movement is mainly related with terrestrial input. In addition to these sources, another way for transport of lithogenic particles is associated with deep-sea sediments [9].

As a member of uranium decay series 210Pb (t1/2= 22.3 y) is an ideal radioisotope to determine sedimentation rates and for dating sediment layers within a period of 150 years. This time period includes both the pre-industrial and industrial eras in the world, hence the importance of the method for studying the environmental changes caused by human activity [10]. 210Pb is produced in the atmosphere as a daughter of 222Rn [1, 11]. Main sources of 210Pb in sediments are supported and unsupported components of 210Pb. The supported 210Pb is a product of the 226Ra in sea and lake sediments. The unsupported 210Pb is called as excess 210Pb which is formed in atmosphere. Therefore, surface sediments have higher 210Pb concentration, and 210Pb levels decrease with depth. This means sedimentation rates and date of sediment layers can be calculated from vertical profiles of 210Pb in cores [11].

The main goal of this study is to determine sedimentation rates in the inner part of Izmir Bay using the vertical profile of 210Pb. The bay is adjacent to the third crowd city in Turkey and Izmir harbor is sited on the inner part of the bay. To our knowledge this study is the first attempt to determine sedimentation rates in the inner bay.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study area

İzmir Bay is one of the largest bays of the Mediterranean Sea. It is surrounded by the İzmir Metropolitan Municipality. Total surface area of the bay is over 500 km2 and water capacity of the bay is approximately 11.5 billion m3. İzmir Bay consists of three parts: the inner, middle and outer bays. The Outer Bay is located between Karaburun and Foça and is around 20 km wide. The Inner Bay is the smallest (57 km2) and shallowest part of the bay. The water depth decreases from Outer Bay to Inner Bay [12, 13].

2.2. Sediment sampling

Sediment samples were collected with core sampler at eight locations (Table 1) in the İnner Bay in 2004 [14]. All samples were transferred to the laboratory and sediment cores were cut in to 4 cm thick using plastic tools. Each sediment layer was dried until a constant dry weight was obtained. Dried samples were disaggregated and passed through a 250 µm sieve.

Table 1.
Core locations and water depth of study area.
Sites  Coordinates  Date  W.D.* 
C1 38°27′42″N, 27°08′54″E 24.02.2004 6
C2 38°27′15″N, 27°07′51″E 25.03.2004 11
C3 38°26′33″N, 27°07′52″E 20.01.2004 13
C4 38°26′36″N, 27°06′26″E 17.05.2004 15
C5 38°25′54″N, 27°06′24″E 20.01.2004 19
C6 38°25′18″N, 27°06′15″E 24.02.2004 17
C7 38°24′38”N, 27°05′29”E 17.05.2004 16
C8 38°25′15″N, 27°05′30″E 17.05.2004 17
Show more
* W.D., water depth in meter.

Water content of samples was calculated by:

Water content (wt.%) = (water weight/wet sediment weight) × 100.

2.3. Radioisotope analysis and sedimentation rate calculation

210Pb activity of each sediment layer was determined by alpha spectroscopy of its daughter 210Po. Before alpha counting, radiochemical separation and electrochemical deposition process was applied to all samples. In this stage, each sediment sample (1 g of dry sediment) was digested in Teflon beaker with a mixture of concentrated HCl, HF and HNO3 together with 209Po yield tracer (0.1 Bq/mL, Eα=4.88 MeV, t1/2=102±5 y) on a hot plate. And then, 210Po was spontaneously deposited onto copper discs in 0.5 M HCl in the presence of ascorbic acid to reduce of Fe+3 to Fe+2 [15]. The samples were transferred to 0.5 M HCl medium in the presence of ascorbic acid to reduce of Fe+3 to Fe+2 and 210Po in the solution was deposited on a copper disc using magnetic stirrer at 60°C for 4 h [16]. The discs were washed with distilled water and measurements of 210Po were performed through its 5.30 MeV alpha particles by using Passivated Implanted Planar Silicon (PIPS) detectors. Collected samples were analyzed two years later [17, 18]. The activities of 210Pb in the lowest layers of the cores were assumed to be in equilibrium with parent 226Ra (210Pbsup). The activities of the layers were therefore subtracted from the total 210Pb activities in order to compute the excess 210Pb. 210Pb geochronology is originated from the radioactive decay of 210Pb with depth (m) in a sediment core. The decay of 210Pb, A(t), is ruled by the radioactive decay law:

APb210ex=A0eλt,

where A0 is the 210Pb activity (surface) at t=0, and λ = 0.03114 y−1is the decay constant for 210Pb. For accepted constant sedimentation rates (CRS), time (t) is linked to depth m through m= wt, where w is the sedimentation rate. Consequently,

APb210ex=A0eλm/w.

Sedimentation rate is estimated from an exponential decrease of 210Pb, using A(m) at depth m [19]. Using this CRS model, the slope of ln(210Pbex) profile distribution gave the sedimentation rates in cm per year (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
Map of the study area
pic

3. Results and Discussion

The 210Po activity concentration measured by alpha spectrometry corresponded to the total 210Pb activity. 210Pbtot (total 210Pb) activities of all cores were plotted against the depths (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.
210Pb (total 210Pb) activities of all cores against the depths.
pic

The 210Pb activity that remained constant below a certain depth is considered as supported 210Pb (existence of 226Ra in the sediment), and the unsupported 210Pb(210Pbex) profile distribution was obtained from the differences between the total 210Pb and supported 210Pb values. The 210Pbsup activities determined for each core varied between 32 and 50 Bq/kg. The depth profiles ln(210Pbex) in sediments for eight cores are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.
The depth profiles ln(210Pbex) in sediment profiles
pic

In this study sedimentation rates varied from 0.10 to 0.52 cm/y. Our results and literature data are given in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The sedimentation rates obtained for Izmir Bay are in the ranges of the reported values, and agree well with the two locations in the Mediterranean Sea shown in Table 3. The highest sedimentation rates were found at C7 (0.52 cm/y) and C8 (0.41 cm/y). The two sites are in the southern portion of the bay and are affected by the Poligon stream which undergoes flooding every year. The lowest sedimentation rate was at C5 (0.10 cm/y) where the water is the deepest of all the sites, and it is located in the middle of the study area, being the farthest from river and/or streams.

Table 2.
Sedimentation rates of İzmir Bay.
Station Sedimentation rates (cm/y)
C1 0.38
C2 0.31
C3 -
C4 0.19
C5 0.10
C6 0.18
C7 0.52
C8 0.41
Show more
Table 3.
A review of sedimentation rates (w) deducted from excess 210Pb geochronology.
Location w (cm/y)
Marmara Sea [20] 0.09–0.19
Northwest Mediterranean[7] 0.01–0.60
Santa Monica Bay[21] 0.19–2.28
Thane Bay[22] 0.32–0.92
Tokyo Bay[23] 0.78–1.02
İse Bay[23] 0.32–0.56
Red Lake, Romania[24] 0.32–2.83
Atibaia River basin, Brasil[25] 0.16–1.32
São Paulo, Brazil[26] 0.60–3.20
Baltic Sea[27] 0.14–0.31
Show more

Figure 4 shows the spatial distribution of 210Pbtot in surface sediments of the bay. 210Pbtot activities on sediment surfaces ranged from 56 to 268 Bq/kg. The distributions show that 210Pbtot was concentrated near at C1. This part of the bay has an enclosed environment and two streams drain into the area. Duman et al. [13] reported that sediment contamination level is extremely high in the inner part of the bay.

Fig. 4.
Spatial 210Pbtot distribution of surface sediments.
pic

Our results show that the highest 210Pbtot concentrations in surface sediments. But, in some sediment cores, the highest levels were detected in subsurface layers. It may be linked to effects of natural process like turbidity, surface water circulation, and intense harbor activities. Nevertheless, 210Pb concentrations decreased exponentially with depth in all cores except at C3, where the 210Pbtot distribution was nearly linear; 210Pbtot concentrations in every layer of this core being almost the same. Bioturbation can cause mixing that result in the linear 210Pb distribution noted. In addition, water depths of the inner part of the bay are quite low. This is a problem that blocked large container ships from entering the bay, thus the harbor area was dredged two times between 1976 and 1990. Collected sediments were dumped on the sea-bed at Göztepe Bay Dump Site and Hekim Island Dump Site, respectively [28]. These dredging activities may be another reason for the non-exponential distribution of 210Pb in the core.

4. Conclusion

This study is planned to present preliminary data on sedimentation rates of Izmir Bay (inner part) and levels of 210Pb of surface sediments. The study area (Izmir Bay) is surrounded by heavily populated landscape and intense industrial activity. Also, harbor activities make that bay an important location. Our results showed that highest sedimentation rates were obtained at C7 and C8, in the southern portion of the bay.They are affected by the Poligon stream which undergoes flooding every year. Low sedimentation rates were found at C4 (0.19 cm/y), C5(0.10 cm/y) and C6(0.18 cm/y), which are far away from the streams.

References
[1] C.M. Alonso-Hernandez, M. Diaz-Asencio, A. Munoz-Caravaca, et al.

Recent changes in sedimentation regime in Cienfuegos Bay, Cuba, as inferred from 210Pb and 137Cs vertical profiles

. Cont. Shelf Res., 26 : 153-167 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.026
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] S.L. Goodbred, S.A. Kuehl.

Floodplain processes in the Bengal Basin and the storage of Ganges-Brahmaputra River sediment: An accretion study using 137Cs and 210Pb geochronology

. Sediment. Geol., 121: 239-258 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(98)00082-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] M. Ivanovich, R.S. Harmon. Uranium Series Disequilibrium, Application to Earth, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Oxford Science Publications, 910 p, 1992.
[4] A.P. Karageorgis, H. Kaberi, N.B. Price, et al.

Chemical composition of short sediment cores from Thermaikos Gulf (Eastern Mediterranean): Sediment accumulation rates, Trawling and Winnowing effects

. Cont. Shelf Res., 25: 2456-2475 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2005.08.006.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] J.A. Sanchez-Cabeza, P. Masque, I. Ani-Ragolta, et al.

Sediment accumulation rates in the Southern Barcelona Continental Margin

. Prog. Oceanogr., 44, 313-332 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S0079-6611(99)00031-2.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] X. Lu, E. Matsumoto,

Implications of excess 210Pb and 137Cs in sediment cores from Mikawa Bay, Japan

. J. Environ Sci., 21, 707-712 (2009). doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62328-1.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] Z. Zuo, D. Eisma, R. Gieles et al.

Accumulation rates and sediment deposition in the Northwestern Mediterranean

. Deep-Sea Res. II, 44, 3-4, 597-609 (1997). doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(96)00083-5.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] A.T. Madsen, A.S. Murray, H. Andersen et al.

Optically stimulated luminescence dating of Young estuarine sediments: A comparison with 210Pb and 137Cs dating

. Mar. Geol., 214, 251-268 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.034
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] P. Munoz, C.B. Lange, D. Gutierrez, et al.

Recent sedimentation and mass accumulation rates based on 210Pb along the Peru-Chile continental margin

. Deep-Sea Res. II, 51, 2523-2541 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.08.015
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] P. Reinikainen, J.J. Merilainen, A. Virtanen, et al.

Accuracy of 210Pb dating in laminated lake sediments background two annually with high Cs

. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 48, 1009-1019 (1997). doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(96)00337-5.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] A.N. Marques, F. Monn, E.V. da S. Filho et al.

Apparent discrepancy in contamination history of a sub-tropical estuary evaluated through 210Pb profile and chronostratigraphical markers

. Mar. Pollut Bull., 52, 532-539 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.09.048.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] R.S. Atgin, O. El-Agha, A. Zararsız, et al.

Investigation of sediment pollution in Izmir Bay: Trace elements

. Spectrochim. Acta B, 55: 1151-1164 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0584-8547(00)00231-7.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] M. Duman, M. Avcı, Ş. Duman, et al.

Surficial sediment distribution and net sediment transport pattern in Izmir Bay, Western Turkey

. Cont. Shelf Res., 24: 965-981 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2004.03.001.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] FAO. Manual of Methods in Aquatic Environment Research, Part 8, Ecological Assesment of Pollution Effects, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No: 209, 50-52 (1981).
[15] W.W. Flynn.

Determination of low levels of polonium-210 in environmental materials

. Anal. Chim. Acta, 43: 221-227(1968). doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)89210-7.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] S. Aközcan,

Levels of 210Po and 210Pb in mussel and sediments in Candarlı Gulf and the related dose assessment to the coastal population, Mar

. Pollution Bull. 73, 11-15 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.06.016
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] D.V. Borole.

Analysis of 210Pb in Sediment Trap Samples and sediments from the Northern Arabian Sea: Evidence for Boundary Scavenging

. Deep-Sea Res. I, 49: 1055-1069 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0967-0637(02)00013-4.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] J.D. Smith, T.F. Hamilton.

Improved technique for recovery and measurement of polonium-210 from environmental materials

. Anal. Chim. Acta, 160, 69-77 (1984). doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)84509-2.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] J. Carroll, M. Williamson, I. Lerche, et al.

Geochronology of Lake Baikal from 210Pb and 137Cs radioisotopes

. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 50: 1105-1119 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00116-X.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] A. Gökmen, M. Yıldız, H.N. Erten, et al.

Dating the Sea of Marmara sediments by a uniform mixing model

, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 33: 91-104 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0265-931X(95)00074-K.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] S.M. Bay, E.Y. Zeng, T.D. Lorenson, et al.

Temporal and spatial distributions of contaminants in sediments of Santa Monica Bay, California

. Mar. Environ. Res., 56: 255-276 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0141-1136(02)00334-3.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] S.K. Jha, T.M. Krishnamoorthy, G.G. Pandit et al.

History of accumulation of mercury and nickel in Thane Creek, Mumbai, using 210Pb dating technique

. Sci. Total Environ., 236: 91-99 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00267-3.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] X. Lu,

Application of the Weilbull extrapolation to 137Cs geochronology in Tokyo Bay and Ise Bay, Japan

, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 73, 169-181 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2003.08.009.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] R. Begy, C. Cosma, A. Timar.

Recent changes in Red Lake (Romania) sedimentation rate determined from depth profiles of 210Pb and 137Cs radioisotopes

. J. Environ. Radioactiv., 100: 644-648 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.05.005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] T.P.P. Sabaris, D.M. Bonotto.

Sedimentation rates in Atibaia River basin, Sao Paulo State, Brazil, using 210Pb as geochronometer

. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 69, 275-288 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.08.016.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] F.R.M. Matamet, D.M. Bonotto.

Evaluation of the chromium contamination at Ribeirão dos Bagres, Franca (SP), Brazil, by the 210Pb method

. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 82, 359-369 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.09.018.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[27] T. Zalewska, J. Woron, B. Danowska et al.,

Temporal changes in Hg, Pb, Cd and Zn environmental concentrations in the southern Baltic Sea sediments dated with 210Pb method

, Oceanologia, 57, 32-43 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.oceano.2014.06.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[28] A.E. Aksu, D. Yaşar, O. Uslu.

Assessment of marine pollution in İzmir Bay: Heavy metal and organic compound concentrations in surficial Sediments

. Turkish J. Eng. Environ. Sci., 22: S387-416 (1998). doi: 10.1007/s00128-013-1008-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar