logo

Magnetic fields in the Planck theory of sonoluminescence

Magnetic fields in the Planck theory of sonoluminescence

Prevenslik T V
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.9, No.4pp.221-226Published in print 01 Nov 1998
27500

Sonoluminescence (SL) observed in the cavitation of water may be explained by the Planck theory of SL that treats the bubbles as collapsing miniature masers having optical waves standing in resonance with the dimensions of bubble cavity. Microwaves are created from the Planck energy of the standing waves provided the bubble wall may be treated as a perfect blackbody surface. In the ultraviolet, liquid H2O is strongly absorbent and the bubble approaches a Planck blackbody enclosure. The micrwaves are created at frequencies proportional to the bubble collapse velocity and are absorbed by the dipoles of the H2O and other bubble wall molecules. Intense electric fields develop as the liquid H2O bubble wall undergoes dielectric polarization. By this theory, free electrons are created in SL as the electric fields breakdown; the presence of free electrons is required if any magnetic field effect is to be observed in SL. Both local and global magnetic effects on SL are described. The local effect is based on the magnetic pressure due to the electrons moving as currents inside the bubble. The global effect is an accumulation of local effects at the voids throughout the liquid H2O causing a reduction in the bulk modulus. Numerical solutions of the Rayleigh-Plesset (R-P) equation are presented that show the effect of applied magnetic field on SL to be the global effect causing a reduction in the bulk modulus. Consistent with the Planck theory of SL, the R-P simulations show the suppression of SL intensity with magnetic field to be parabolic and the SL intensity to be linear with collapse velocity.

SonoluminescenceMaserMagnetic fields
References
1 Prevenslik T V.

Biological effects of ultrasonic cavitation

. Fifth International Conference on Cold Fusion, April 9-13, 1995. Monte Carlo, Monaco
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2 Prevenslik T V. Sonoluminescence: IRaser?. Ninth International Conference on Photoacoustic and Photothermal Phenomena. June 27-30, 1996, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
3 Prevenslik T V.

Sonoluminescence in the Planck theory

. Submitted to Chin J Acoustics, 1997
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4 Wang C H, Zhang D Z. Chin J Acoustics (in Chinese), 1964, 1(2): 59
5 Prevenslik T V, Wu Z, Chen F.

Sonoluminescence: Femtosecond lasing in the microwave region

. International Conference on Laser Physics and Quantum Optics. Hong Kong, January 7-9, 1997. Singapore: Springer-Verlag. 1997. 84
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6 Prevenslik T V. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 1997, 8(2): 94
7 Young J B, Schmiedel T, Kang W. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 4816
8 Wu C C, Roberts P H. Phys Rev Lett, 1993, 70: 3424
9 Moss W C, Clarke D B, White J W et al. Phys Lett A, 1996, 211: 69
10 Prevenslik T V. Nucl Sci Tech, 1997, 8(4): 236
11 Prevenslik T V.

Sonoluminescence: The effect of magnetic field in the Planck theory

. Symposium on Sonoluminescence, University of Chicago, Sep 12-13, 1997
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12 Prevenslik T V. Sonoluminescence: The effect of magnetic fields in the Planck Theory. 16th International Conference on Acoustics, Seattle, June 20-26, 1998
13 Brennen C E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995
14 Hammitt F G. Cavitation and multiphase flow phenomena. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980
15 Valuev A A, Zheludkov S V, Iskakov A N et al. Russ J Phys Chem, 1992, 66(2): 137