logo

Gas-cooled thorium reactor at various fuel loadings and its modification by a plasma source of extra neutrons

NUCLEAR ENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

Gas-cooled thorium reactor at various fuel loadings and its modification by a plasma source of extra neutrons

Andrey Arzhannikov
Sergey Bedenko
Vladimir Shmakov
Vladimir Knyshev
Igor Lutsik
Vadim Prikhodko
Igor Shamanin
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.30, No.12Article number 181Published in print 01 Dec 2019Available online 20 Nov 2019
36300

This work presents the results of computer simulation of neutronic processes in a high-temperature gas-cooled thorium reactor for 30 different options of core loading. To guarantee stable and long-term reactor operation (7–10 years), the quantity of fuel compact dispersion phase and starting fuel composition was selected. It is demonstrated that it is possible in principle to substitute the near-axial recirculation zone of the reactor core by a long magnetic trap with a high-temperature plasma column for generating thermonuclear neutrons. The distribution of neutron yield along the length of the plasma source is also presented. Such a thorium reactor, with a near-axial source of extra neutrons, can be applied for researching thermophysical and neutronic characteristics of dispersion thorium fuel to improve its properties. The results of the work are of great interest from the perspective of future advancement of the thermonuclear power industry, by means of creation of a hybrid installation based on a thorium reactor with a long plasma column as a source of additional neutrons.

Low-power thorium reactorThorium hybrid reactorNuclear fuel evolution

1 Introduction

The study of the physics of low-power high-temperature gas-cooled thorium reactor units (HGTRU) (Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU), Tomsk) was started three years ago [1-3] and its authors have already chosen the most appropriate core configuration and nuclear fuel material composition. The authors have stated [1] that the reactor being studied is capable of operating for no less than 3000 effective days at a power of 60 MWth.

Reactors of this type [1-18] are considered ideal sources of energy and heat for supplying power to distant regions of the country, and do not require large reservoirs or rivers. In case of bringing such reactors [1, 2, 8-18] to a commercially competitive level, they are intended to ensure the power industry basis of such Russian regions. These reactors have several advantages in comparison with other types: high reliability, high efficiency (up to 50%), possibility to use fuel of different types and compositions, short period of construction and equipment delivery, low cost (in comparison with the thermal light-water reactors (LWR) generally used and the BN-type (BN-600, -800) sodium-cooled fast breeder reactor), and simplified management of spent fuel.

A special feature of the reactor studied in this work [1, 2] is that it is able to produce heat, electricity, and hydrogen simultaneously, and its core can easily be modified for solving another task [19]. In addition, the reactor power can be adjusted according to regional energy needs.

At present, a series of experiments is being carried out at TPU for the purpose of studying the physical properties of new-generation nuclear fuel for HGTRU. Dispersion fuel, which is being developed at TPU, is also a new-generation fuel. It is a fuel material with advanced mechanical, thermophysical, and neutronic properties. As the reactor core has not previously been studied with this fuel in neutronic experiments, it was necessary to create an installation to carry out the required experiments. A special facility intended for studying the neutronic properties of the dispersion (Th,Pu)O2 fuel was suggested in the capacity of such installation by the employee group of Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia) [19]. This facility is an assembly of fuel blocks, the axial part of which is substituted by a long magnetic trap [20, 21] with high-temperature plasma providing generation of thermonuclear neutrons.

The results of computer simulation of neutronic processes in the core of the HGTRU for 30 different loading options are presented in the paper.

To ensure stable reactor operation, the fraction of the dispersion phase and the composition of the starting fissionable nuclide were chosen. The possibility to modify the axial part of the core was investigated in accordance with the concept suggested in the works [19]. From the perspective of advancement in the field of fundamental knowledge, the purpose of these researches is to expand and to deepen understanding of the possibilities that are opening up due to the development of thermonuclear energy technologies of the future. From the perspective of solutions to important applied tasks, it can be said that the results will form the basis of organizing the stable operation of HGTRU in a long-term operating cycle (no less than 7 years), with a high burn-up degree of both the thorium and plutonium components of the fuel.

2 Numerical investigation

2.1 Computational model of the basic core configuration

The core of the HTGRU (red colored area in Fig. 1, see [1]) consists of fuel blocks in the configuration of graphite hexagons. The core is surrounded by two rows of graphite hexagons of the same configuration, but without holes for fuel (white colored area in Fig. 1). On the top and bottom the core is also closed with graphite blocks, but here they are laid in just one row.

Fig. 1.
(Color online) Schematic of the cross-section of a reactor core model.
pic

Schematic drawings of the fuel block and its cross-section are presented in Fig. 2. One can see that there are cylindrical channels along the length of the block. The fuel block contains 76 channels of small diameter for fuel pellets (indicated in red) and seven channels of large diameter for helium flows (indicated in blue). The width of the graphite fuel block is 0.207 m, and its height is 0.8 m. The width of the graphite block enclosing the core at both the top and bottom is also 0.207 m, but its height is 0.3 m.

Fig. 2.
(Color online) Schematics of the core fuel block (a) and its cross-section (b).
pic

Microencapsulated fuel (microfuel) for a fuel pellet of HGTRU (Fig. 3, [1]) is a spherical fuel kernel of fissionable material (Th; Pu)O2 with a diameter of 350 μm, covered successively by layers of pyrolytic carbon (PyC) and Ti3SiC2. These fuel kernels are dispersed into a graphite matrix of cylindrical fuel pellets (Fig. 3), which are placed in the fuel block.

Fig. 3.
(Color online) Microencapsulated fuel and fuel pellet of the type 1017.
pic

At the first stage of research presented in the works [1-3], three types of fuel pellets with reference designations 0817, 1017, and 1200 were used. The diameters of these fuel pellet types were different: 8.17×103, 10.17×103, and 12.00×103m, respectively. The heights of the fuel pellets (20×103 m) and thicknesses of the external SiC layer (0.3×103 m) were equal for all types. The percentage of heavy metal content in all types of fuel pellets were (%): Pu–50, 232Th–50; and the isotopic compositions of Pu were (wt%) [1]: 238 – 0, 239 – 94, 240 – 5.4, 241 – 0.6, 242 – 0.

In the work [1] it is shown that an increase in fuel pellet diameter leads to a decrease in the initial excess of reactivity ρinf (ρinf = (kinf - 1)/kinf) (providing the size dimensions of the reactor fuel block are unchanged).

It should be noted that the reactor operation time depends on the initial quantity of Pu, Th in the loaded fuel and accumulated isotopes 241Pu and 233U.

When a fuel pellet of the type 0817 is used, the isotope 239Pu burns up quickly and the secondary fuel (241Pu and 233U) does not manage to accumulate in quantities sufficient for stable and long-term operation of the reactor.

Therefore, after 1250 days of reactor operation, there is too little 239Pu left in the core (less than 2 %), and ρinf sharply falls to 0. When the fuel pellets of the types 1017 (dρinf/dt 0.011 %/days) and 1200 (dρinf/dt 0.007 %/days) are used, it results in the accumulation of 233U, 241Pu in the middle of the fuel cycle, prolonging the core life with steadier reactor operation.

It should be noted that for pellets of the type 0817, 1017, and 1200, the burn-up of 239Pu (η(239Pu) = (N (tbeginning) - N (tend))/N(tbeginning)) is 95.5, 96.6 and 92.7%, respectively [1]. This means that loading the core with type 1200 fuel pellets is the most appropriate for achieving maximum fuel core lifetime.

Further calculations showed (Fig. 4) that an increase in the dispersed phase fraction ωf (ωf = Vmicrofuel×N/Vmatrix) of the type 1200 fuel pellet results in a decrease in η(239Pu). Consequently, to provide better burn-up of 239Pu in the (Th,Pu)-fuel cycle, the type 1017 fuel pellet has to be chosen.

Fig. 4.
(Color online) Neutronic properties of the reactor cell unit for two types of fuel pellet: 1 – type 1017; 2 – type 1200.
pic

Computations were performed for the unit cell of the infinite regular lattice (kinf) in the program WIMS-D5B; the fuel part of the cell was homogenized. The computational model of the cell unit is presented in [1]; the homogenization process is described in the works [1, 22]. WIMS-D5B (Nuclear Energy Agency) is a universal program for computing cells of different reactor types. The WIMS code uses a 69-group system of constants on the basis of the evaluated nuclear database ENDF/B-VII.0 (the basic library has been compiled with 14 fast groups, 13 resonance groups, and 42 thermal groups), which allows computing in reactors of fast and thermal neutrons. In WIMS, the accuracy of the computed functionals is set by the step equal to 10 days. To assess poisoning in the reactor by xenon, the first 2 days are computed separately.

2.2 Neutronic computations for different core-loading configurations

At the second stage of the performed computer calculations, the cylindrical reactor cell that is an equivalent of the Wigner–Seitz system is studied. The fuel part of the cell is homogenized; computations are also performed in the program WIMS-D5B. To determine the effective K-factor (keff), an axial and radial geometrical parameter (B) is introduced. It is computed considering the transition from the actual core size to the equivalent Wigner–Seitz system. "White mirror" is used as a boundary condition on the side surface of the cell, and "translation symmetry" is used on the cell faces. The computation results of 30 core-loading options with type 1017 fuel pellets are presented in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.
Neutronic properties of the equivalent system: (a) –dependence of η(239Pu) on ωf, (b) – dependence of irradiation time T on ωf.
pic

The results of the computer simulation show that the increase in ωf after reaching a level of 17–18% does not lead to any noticeable increase in the reactor fuel campaign T (days) (Fig. 5(b)). The increase in ωf also has no effect on the spectrum ϕVn(E) of the reactor under study (Fig. 6). It should be noted that it is not possible with existing technologies to synthesize a fuel compact in which ωf is more than 37.5%.

Fig. 6.
The neutron spectrum in the reactor core: (a) – normalized spectrum of the neutron flux; (b) – integral distribution function of the neutrons over energy in the flux.
pic

Therefore, for further research we chose the type 1017 fuel pellet at ωf = 18%. The 2221 spheres of the microfuel are used in the type 1017 fuel pellets with the dispersed phase fraction at the chosen ωf = 18%. The fuel mass in this pellet is equal to 0.519 × 103 kg (Th, Pu)O2, the full core loading = 600.6 kg, 232Th = 246.24 kg, and 239Pu = 231.47 kg.

According to the results obtained in WIMS, the reactor with this type of fuel pellets is capable of operating for 3110 effective days at the power P = 60 MWth. The neutron flux density in the core ϕVn(E) is 8.14×1013 n cm^-2 s^-1. There are 9.41% of the neutrons with energy En up to 4 eV, 35.57% of neutrons with En from 4 eV up to 183.2 keV, and 55.02% of neutrons with En from 183.2 keV to 10.5 MeV (Fig. 5). In these conditions, (keff) is 1.24, ρinitial 19.35%, and (dρ/dt) 6.2 × 103%/days. The burn-up of 239Pu is 81.3% (η = N (0) – N(3110))/N(0)), and the burn-up of 232Th is 9.66%. The computation results of fuel isotopic composition evolution N(t) are presented in Fig. 7 and in Table 1.

TABLE 1.
Mass content (wt %/mHM) of the minor actinides in the middle and at the end of the irradiation time t
Nuclide Beginning of life Medium of life End of life
239Pu 47 % 26.54 % 8.81 %
240Pu 2.5 % 2.84 % 2.35 %
241Pu 0.5 % 5.39 % 6.33 %
242Pu - 0.42 % 1.26 %
232Th 50 % 47.82 % 45.17 %
232U - 0.00 % 9.63E-04 %
233U - 1.66 % 2.70 %
234U - 0.09 % 0.28 %
235U - 0.01 % 0.07 %
242Cm - 0.00 % 0.13 %
244Cm - 0.00 % 0.20 %
Burn-out 0 145.5 304
(GWt×d/tHM)
t (days) 0 1500 3130
Show more
Fig. 7.
(Color online) Concentration evolution of the main minor actinides in HGTRU with time due to fuel burn-up.
pic

Additionally, the dependence of concentration changes of isotopes ^231,233Pa on time 231,233N(t) were derived, and concentrations of 149Sm and 135Xe were analyzed. The data on ^231,233Pa, 233U, 149Sm, and 135Xe concentrations allow the evaluation of the required intensity In (t) of neutron emission from a thermonuclear reaction in a plasma column. By varying the percentage of D-T reactions in comparison with D-D reactions in the plasma column, one can change In within the range 1013 n cm^-1 s^-1 to 2 × 1014 n cm^-1 s^-1. That should provide the condition keff = constant during both the first days of operation of the facility and the whole fuel irradiation cycle.

The neutronic computation performed in WIMS-D5B was repeated in the program MCU5TPU [23]. The results of these computations are presented in Fig. 8. The code MCU5TPU was developed at the National Research Center Kurchatov Institute (Russia), and is used for simulation of particle transfer by the Monte-Carlo method in any reactor. MCU uses its own nuclear data bank, MCUDB50 [23].

Fig. 8.
(Color online) Dependence of keff on the core operation time t in case of large initial reactivity excess.
pic

If one creates a large initial reactivity excess ρinitial (as demonstrated in Fig. 8) then a burnable absorber can compensate for this excess. For example, to compensate for the large ρinitial in the LWR and BN-type reactors, Gd_2O_3, Er_2O_3, and B_4C are used. In this case, daughter nuclides formed as a result of radiation capture reactions on 157Gd, 167Er, and 10B do not have a significant impact regarding further neutronic processes in the core.

In solving the task of choosing the appropriate burnable absorber, it is of interest to search for nuclides, the daughter nuclides of which can have a favorable effect on the development of a self-supporting chain reaction. The authors of the works [24, 25] suggested using PaO_2 as a burnable absorber. A peculiar feature of isotope 231Pa is that its transmutation leads to the formation of 232U and 233U, and isotope 233U is a fissionable material. This means that isotope 231Pa performs the functions of a burnable absorber and a source of a new fissionable material. However, 231Pa production in the amounts required for implementation of the concept suggested in the work [24] is rather challenging. That said, 231Pa can be effectively used in small amounts as a burnable absorber, for example, in a high-temperature reactor core.

In the work [25] it is suggested to use 240Pu as a burnable material. In our case (Fig. 7), the presence of 240Pu in the fuel composition results in significant accumulation of 241Pu, which can be well fissioned by epithermal neutrons, and its nuclear concentration 241N(t) exceeds the nuclear concentration of 233U by more than 2.5 times across the whole fuel campaign. The computation showed that 241Pu and 233U specify the dependence type of keff (t) and provide steady reactor operation for 8.5 years.

The proposed usage of 231Pa becomes appropriate if we compare the dependency of absorption cross-sections abs(E) on the neutron energy E for traditional neutron absorbers with the dependency for 231Pa (Fig. 9 and Table 2). It is seen in Fig. 9 (ENDF/B-VII.I) that the neutron-absorption cross-section on the nuclei of 157Gd, 167Er, and 10B for the neutron energy range 0.3-106 eV are on a level close to the absorption cross-section of the nuclei of 231Pa.

TABLE 2.
Neutron-absorption cross-section for medium energy of the reactor energy spectrum.
Nuclide abs(Eaverage) barn
231Pa 0.742
10B 0.656
167Er 0.186
157Gd 0.188
240Pu 0.143
Show more
Fig. 9.
(Color online) Dependence of neutron-absorption cross-sections of various isotopes on neutron energy.
pic

If one examines Fig. 6(b), one can come to the conclusion that about 91% of neutrons in the core of the reactor have an energy more than 4 eV. The average value (Eaverage) on the neutron energy spectrum shown in Fig. 6(a) is 5.539 × 105 eV. The absorption cross-sections abs(Eaverage) of the nuclei of absorbers and 231Pa are presented in Table 2 for abs(Eaverage). It can be seen that 231Pa is likely to be a substitute for 10B and some other traditional absorbers. The influence of 10B on the neutronic properties of a reactor core with epithermal and fast neutron spectrum was analyzed by the authors in [1].

In the loading option discussed above (Fig. 8), the initial reactivity excess is compensated for by the isotope 240Pu. Its content (wt%) in the fuel increased from 5.4% up to 9%; the content of 239Pu decreased by 3.6%, correspondingly. The use of 240Pu in HTGRU does not lead to any undesired increase of reactivity in the middle of the fuel cycle, as it happens in the core of the pressurized water reactor (PWR) [26]. Using 240Pu, ρinitial was reduced from 19.35% to 11.51%, and (dρ/dt) decreased by a factor of 1.51. According to the concept suggested by the authors in the work [19], the core of HGTRU, the axial part of which is substituted by a long magnetic trap with high-temperature plasma, starts up from the subcritical state (keff = 0.95). To transfer the core into the subcritical state, it is enough to cover the surfaces of fuel pellets with a 13 μm thick layer of ZrB_2.

2.3 Computational model of the axial zone of the core; specific neutron yield of fusion plasma source

Currently, two types of neutron source for continuous operation in a fission–fusion hybrid energy system seem to be the most promising. The first type is an accelerator-driven system (ADS). This type is the most studied [30, 31]. In this work, we focus our studies on the second type – a neutron source based on fusion plasma in a long magnetic trap. The schematic drawing of the facility intended to study nuclei fuel properties in the operation of such a plasma neutron source is presented in Fig. 10 [19]. The axial zone of the reactor core is substituted for a cylindrical vacuum chamber that contains high-temperature plasma generating high-energy neutrons by D-D and/or D-T fusion reactions. To inject heating neutral beams into the plasma, a special chamber is attached to this cylindrical chamber. A magnetic field in these two adjoined vacuum chambers containing the plasma provides heat isolation of this plasma from the chamber walls in a radial direction. Heat isolation of the plasma along the magnetic field lines is provided by the multimirror sections of the magnetic field, which are adjacent to the ends of the two adjoined chambers of high-temperature plasma. The chamber for fusion neutron generation in the axial zone of the core has the required length of 3 m. The total length of the two adjoined chambers of high-temperature plasma is approximately 7 m. The total length of the whole facility is about 12 m.

Fig. 10.
(Color online) Schematic of the facility containing the plasma neutron source to study the fuel properties in long-time operation of the reactor core.
pic

Distribution of the magnetic field induction along the axis of the two adjoined chambers with high-energy ions (the length is approximately 7 m) was chosen in the paper [20] from considerations of the maximum neutron yield in the core plasma region upon the condition of good homogeneity of radial neutron flow. The choice of plasma parameters in the long magnetic trap was made according to the provided computation results. The results of the calculation [20] for the distribution along the textitz-axis of the specific neutron yield per linear centimeter of the plasma column in the case of D-D reaction is plotted in Fig. 11. A red bar located on the interval of z-coordinates from 200 cm to 500 cm marks the part of the column that is situated inside the reactor core. One can see in Fig. 11 that for the distribution of magnetic field and plasma column parameters chosen in [20], the specific neutron yield changed insignificantly in the plasma column part that was placed in the core. Nevertheless, non-homogeneity of plasma distribution along the z-axis may be taken into consideration in our simulations. As examples of the possibility to analyze various plasma distributions along the z-axis, the specific neutron yields of plasma neutron sources with cylindrical and conical shapes of the plasma column were analyzed.

Fig. 11.
(Color online) Distribution of the specific neutron yield per linear centimeter of the plasma column in the case of D-D fusion reactions along the z-axis (the part of the column inside the reactor core is marked by the red line).
pic

In numerical simulation, it was considered that the plasma column is a volume source of monoenergetic neutrons with isotropic velocity distribution at the point of their origination.

In accordance with the results of the paper [20], injection of a 100 MW deuterium beam will produce high-energy sloshing ions with density up to 1.5 × 1014 cm-3. In this case, the specific emission of neutrons from a volume unit due to the D-D reaction is 1.76 × 1012 n cm^-3 s^-1 in the core region, and the specific neutron yield rate is 6.00 × 1013 n cm^-1 s^-1. The power of 2.45 MeV neutrons will be about 20 kW in the whole device and about 6 kW inside the core region. Two options are suggested to increase the neutron yield. The first is to add tritium and produce plasma with the percentage 50% D and 50% T isotopes. The simple estimation for this condition shows that neutrons with power of 14.1 MeV will generate up to 2.5–3 MW in the whole device and up to 0.8–0.9 MW inside the core region. If the injection power of neutral beams is reduced 10 times down to 10 MW, the power of D-T neutrons will decrease by approximately two orders of magnitude and will have values close to the basic D-D scenario. The second option is to improve plasma confinement by multimirror plugs, while the basic calculation assumes ordinary mirror configuration. This option could increase the neutron yield by several times, but its applicability is still contingent on experimental proofs.

We calculated a spatial neutron flux distribution ϕZn(z) over the z-axis for the external surface of the copper winding of the plasma neutron source for both cases: 50% T with 50% D, and 100 % D at the same specific neutron yield 6.00 × 1013 n cm^-1 s^-1. The neutron flux distributions for cylindrical and conical shapes of the plasma column were analyzed. The diameter of the cylindrical plasma column was 17 cm. For the conical column shape, its diameter decreased from 17 cm down to 13 cm over a length of 300 cm. As one can see in Fig. 10, a copper winding covers the external surface of the vacuum chamber. This copper winding has thickness 5 cm and is divided from the plasma column by the vacuum chamber wall, of thickness 4 mm. Considering the thickness of the winding, the external surface of the plasma neutron source has a diameter that varies from 22 cm to 18 cm for the conical plasma column shape. This diameter is 22 cm for the cylindrical shape. The neutron flux ϕSn(E) on the external surface of the copper winding was generated by usage of the program in the energy group structure ABBN-78 (of 28 energy neutron groups). Spatial neutron flux distribution ϕn(z) with respect to the z-axis of the facility and its radius y was obtained by placing a computational grid with a size of 1000 by 1000 cells along the height z (ϕZn(z)) and radius y (ϕYn(z)) of the model.

The presented results were obtained in simulations performed using the programs MCNP5 (ENDF/B-VII.0) [27], Serpent 1.1.7 (ENDF/B-VII.0) [28], and PRIZMA (ENDF/B-VII.I) [29]. The study using the program PRIZMA was performed at the Zababakhin All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Technical Physics (http://www.vniitf.ru/o-vniitf). The classic Monte-Carlo method was used to solve the task in the frame of the MCNP, Serpent, and PRIZMA applications. In the simulations, we considered the influence of copper coils on the propagation of the neutron fluxes in the volume of the stand. In accordance with the results of detailed computer simulations and the information about usage of copper conductors in fission reactors, we concluded that our magnetic field coils could be operated without being destroyed during the operation cycle of our fission–fusion stand.

3 CALCULATION DATA AND DISCUSSION

The calculation data of the neutron flux density distribution ϕZn(z) on the external surface of the plasma neutron source for cylindrical (blue and green) and tapered (conic) plasma (red) are presented in Fig. 12 for both cases: 50% T with 50%D, and 100% D. For these calculations, we applied the computation model and program code in the frame of usage of MCNP5.

Fig. 12.
(Color online) Neutron flux density on the external surface of the plasma neutron source vs z-coordinate.
pic

We used three different codes to calculate the data of the neutron flux normalized spectrum ϕSn(E) (the fraction of neutrons escaping in the direction of the core from 1 cm2 of the facility side surface per second) on the external surface of the facility. As one can see in Fig. 13(a), these three codes give almost identical results. The maximum discrepancy between MCNP5 and Serpent 1.1.7 is observed in the 26th energy group (that is, for neutrons in the energy range En from 6.5 to 10.5 MeV) and is -6.42 %. The maximum discrepancy between MCNP5 and PRIZMA is +3.35 % (the 26th energy group). The discrepancy in the calculation data is conditioned by the use of the nuclear data from libraries of different revision and by the peculiarities of their preparation.

Fig. 13.
(Color online) Spectrum of the neutrons in the flux on the surface of the plasma neutron source.
pic

It can be seen in Fig. 11 that ϕZn(z) greatly depends on the plasma column shape, but ϕSn(E) differs significantly only in the 28th group (Fig. 13(b)) in the energy range of En from 14.0 to 14.5 MeV. Therefore, to determine the power distribution of D-T neutrons it is possible not to consider plasma non-homogeneity and neutron flux in the radial direction.

The calculation data performed in Serpent (Fig. 14) showed that the probability density of neutron interactions of (n, xn) type was at a maximum in steel constructional elements and in inner layers of the copper solenoid (Fig. 14, red color). In the peripheral layers of the copper winding, the (n, 2n)-reaction is almost absent (Fig. 14, blue color).

Fig. 14.
(Color online) Probability density of (n, 2n) reactions in constructional elements of the facility: longitudinal cross-section.
pic

If, however, the layer of BeO is placed on the external surface of the solenoid, D-T neutrons from the 23rd to 28th groups (neutrons with En from 2.5 to 14.5 MeV) contribute to the production of neutrons in the channel of (n, 2n) reactions on nuclei of isotope 9Be.

In a fixed-source MCNP problem, the net multiplication M is defined to be unity plus the gain Gf in neutrons from fission, plus the gain Gx from no fission multiplicative reactions. As the multiplication M in the facility is conditioned mainly by (n, 2n) reactions, in the case of D-T plasma M = 1 + Gn,2n. In the facility with D-T plasma of cylindrical and conical shape, M is equal to 1.2742 and 1.2728 (MCNP5), respectively. In addition, the contribution of (n, 2n)-reactions to multiplication is 21.3%. In the case of D-D plasma, M is 1.000 (MCNP5).

The total escape of D-D neutrons from the facility is 80.4%, while neutron escape from the side and end surfaces are 66.5 (ϕZn = 6.67 × 1012 n cm^-2 s^-1 and 13.9% (ϕYn = 1.39 × 1013 n cm^-2 s^-1), respectively.

The total escape of D-T neutrons from the facility is 98.5%, of which neutron escape from the sides and end surface is 83.6 (ϕZn = 8.39×1012 n cm^-2 s^-1) and 14.9% (ϕYn = 1.49 × 1013 n cm^-2 s^-1), respectively. It should also be mentioned that thorium in the first row of the assembly transmutes into 231Pa under the influence of D-T neutrons from the 26th, 27th, and 28th groups due to (n, xn)-reactions. Therefore, the core provides extra neutrons and fissionable isotope 233U.

To compare the neutron spectrum ϕSn(E) (Fig. 13) with the spectrum ϕVn(E) (Fig. 6) correctly, ϕSn(E) was derived in the energy group structure WIMS69 (WIMS-D5B), and an additional neutron group with energy from 10.5 to 14.5 MeV (Fig. 14) was used. The neutron flux distribution functions n(Ei)=0Eiϕn(E)dE/0ϕn(E)dE presented in Fig. 15 were derived in the same energy group structure as the functions ϕVn(E) (Fig. 15, curve 1) and ϕSn(E) (Fig. 15, curve 2).

Fig. 15.
(Color online) Neutron flux energy spectrum: 1–Normalized neutron flux energy spectrum ϕVn(E) in the core; 2, 3, 4 –Normalized neutron flux energy spectrum ϕSn(E) on the surface of the facility.
pic

In accordance calculations, neutrons escaping from the side surface of the facility (Fig. 16, curve 2) can be divided into four main group with different energy En. The percentages of these groups of neutrons are as follows: 2.03% – En from zero to 4 eV (thermal neutrons), 30.19% – En from 4 eV to 183 keV (epithermal neutrons), 50.11% – En from 183 keV to 10.5 MeV, and 17.69% – En from 10.5 to 14.5 MeV (fast neutrons). In the reactor core (Fig. 16, curve 1) there are 9.41% thermal neutrons, 35.57% epithermal, and 55.02% fast neutrons. For the data presented in Fig. 15, the specific neutron yield is In = 6.0 × 1013 n cm^-1 s^-1 (Fig. 11).

Fig. 16.
(Color online) Integrated energy distribution functions of neutron flux: 1–core; 2–side surface of the facility
pic

To achieve the possibility of exactly correct usage of neutron emissions from the plasma source for studying neutronic and thermal-physical properties of thorium–plutonium fuel in the core of HGTRU, we have to achieve a specific neutron yield on the level In = 1.8 × 1014 n cm^-1 s^-1 (Fig. 15, curve 3). This is three times large than the 6.0 × 1013 n cm^-1 s^-1 (Fig. 15, curve 2) that was already achieved in simulation for the D-D plasma column. This increase in neutron yield will be realized in the case of replacing a certain quantity of deuterium with tritium in the plasma column, without changing any other parameters of the plasma. In the case of the 50% T with 50% D in the plasma column with other plasma parameters unchanged, the specific neutron yield has to be 25 times greater.

4 CONCLUSION

Computer simulation of neutronic processes in the core of a high-temperature gas-cooled thorium reactor for 30 different options of core loadings was performed in the frame of our work. The quantity of fuel compact dispersion phase and the composition of fissionable nuclides were examined. Production of extra neutrons by the means of thermonuclear reactions occurring in high-temperature plasma and of (n, xn)-type reactions was analyzed. The possibility of applying a plasma D-T source of neutrons to modify the near-axial region of the HGTRU core was demonstrated. It was shown that the developed models and computer codes for description of the core and thermonuclear neutron source allow progression to a full-scale study aimed at creation of a thorium subcritical assembly with supply of extra neutrons from thermonuclear plasma through its confinement in the long magnetic trap.

References
[1] I.V. Shamanin, V.M. Grachev, S.V. Bedenko et al.,

Neutronic properties of high-temperature gas-cooled reactors with thorium fuel

. Annals of Nuclear Energy 113, 286-293 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.11.045
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] S.V. Bedenko, N. Ghal-Eh, I.O. Lutsik, I.V. Shamanin,

A fuel for generation IV nuclear energy system: Isotopic composition and radiation characteristics

. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 147, 189-196(2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.03.005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] I.V. Shamanin, S.V. Bedenko, Yu.B. Chertkov,

Thorium-loaded low-power reactor installation operated with super-long fuel residence time

. Izvestiya Wysshikh Uchebnykh Zawedeniy, Yadernaya Energetika. 2, 121-132(2016). (in Russia)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4]

Innovative nuclear systems of the VI generation

, see http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf33.htmlworld-nuclear.org/info/inf33.html (accessed 04.04.2019).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] V. Kuznetsov,

Options for small and medium sized reactors to overcome loss of economies of scale and incorporate increased proliferation resistance and energy security

. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 50 (2-6), 242-250(2008). DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.11.006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] M.K. Rowinski, T.J. White, J. Zhao,

Small and Medium sized Reactors: A review of technology

. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 643-656(2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] U.E. Humphrey, M.U. Khandaker,

Viability of thorium-based nuclear fuel cycle for the next generation nuclear reactor: Issues and prospects

. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 97, 259-275(2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.019
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] T. Abram, S. Ion,

Generation-IV nuclear power: A review of the state of the science

. Energy Policy. 36 (12), 4323-4330 (2008). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.05
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] D.Y. Cui, S.P. Xia, X.X. Li, et al.,

Transition toward thorium fuel cycle in a molten salt reactor by using plutonium

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28 152, (2017). DOI: 10.1007/s41365-017-0303-y
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] D.A. Petti, R.R. Hobbins, P. Lowry, H. Gougar,

Representative Source terms and the influence of reactor attributes on functional containment in modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactors

. Nuclear Technology. 184 (2), 181-197(2013). DOI: 10.13182/NT184-181
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] A. Talamo, W. Gudowski,

Adapting the deep burn in-core fuel management strategy for the gas turbine - Modular helium reactor to a uranium-thorium fuel

. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 32 (16), 1750-1781(2005). DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2005.07.002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] H. Chang, Y. Yang, X. Jing, Y. Xu,

Thorium-based fuel cycles in the modular high temperature reactor

, in Tsinghua Science and Technology, 11 (6), 731-738 (2016). DOI: 10.1016/S1007-0214(06)70257-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] H. Nickel, H. Nabielek, G. Pott, A.W. Mehner,

Long time experience with the development of HTR fuel elements in Germany

. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 217 (1-2), 141-151(2002). DOI: 10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00128-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] C.Y. Zou, C.Z. Cai, C.G. Yu, J.H. Wu, J.G. Chen,

Transition to thorium fuel cycle for TMSR

. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 330, 420-428(2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.01.033
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15]

Innovative nuclear systems of the VI generation (Akademik Lomonosov-1, 2)

, see http://www.okbm.nnov.ru/upload/iblock/456/45621ca6723f2345078c93b06b36c7e2.pdf (accessed 11.10.2018, in Russia)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16]

High Temperature Gas Reactor: SHIDAO BAY-1

https://prisweb.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=957prisweb.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=957 (accessed 11.10.2018)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17]

The project for constructing a Small Modular Reactor (Idaho National Laboratory)

, see https://inl.gov/article/frequently-asked-questions/inl.gov/article/frequently-asked-questions/(accessed 04.04.2019)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] US Department of Energy,

the project for constructing a High Temperature Gas Reactor

, see http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Triso-project-clears-first-phase-of-loan-guaranteeworld-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Triso-project-clears-first-phase-of-loan-guarantee (accessed 04.04.2019)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] A.V. Arzhannikov, A.B. Anikeev, A.D. Beklemishev, et al.,

Subcritical Assembly with Thermonuclear Neutron Source as Device for Studies of Neutron-physical Characteristics of Thorium Fuel

. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1771, (2016). DOI: 10.1063/1.4964246
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] D.V. Yurov, V.V. Prikhodko, Yu.A. Tsidulko,

Nonstationary model of an axisymmetric mirror trap with nonequilibrium plasma

. Plasma Physics Reports. 42 (3) 210-225(2016). DOI: 10.1134/S1063780X16030090
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] P.A. Bagryansky, A.A. Ivanov, E.P. Kruglyakov, et al.,

Gas dynamic trap as high power 14 MeV neutron source

. Fusion Engineering and Design. 70 (1), 13-33(2004). DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2003.08.002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] A. Pazirandeh, S. Ghaseminejad, M. Ghaseminejad,

Effects of various spacer grid modeling on the neutronic parameters of the VVER-1000 reactor

. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 38, 1978-1986(2011). DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.04.020
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] MCU project.

Monte Carlo modelling of particle transport

, see https://mcuproject.ru/rabout.htmlmcuproject.ru/rabout.html (accessed 07.10.2018, in Russia)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] G.G. Kulikov, E.G. Kulikov, A.N. Shmelev, et al.,

Protactinium-231 - New burnable neutron absorber

. Izvestiya Wysshikh Uchebnykh Zawedeniy, Yadernaya Energetika. 3, 195-204 (2017). (in Russia)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] A.N. Shmelev, G.G. Kulikov, V.A. Kurnaev, et al.,

Hybrid fusion-fission reactor with a thorium blanket: Its potential in the fuel cycle of nuclear reactors

. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 78(10), 1100-1111(2015). DOI: 10.1134/S1063778815100117
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] A. Hussain, C. Xinrong,

Small PWR core design with coated particle based fuel with a novel composition

. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 52 (6), 531-535 (2010). DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2010.02.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[27] F.B. Brown, The MCNP5 Random Number Generator, LA-UR-07-7961 (2007)
[28] J. Leppanen, M. Pus, T. Viitanen, et al.,

The Serpent Monte Carlo code: Status, development and applications in 2013

. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 82, 142-150 (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[29] Y.Z. Kandiev, E.A. Kashaeva, K.E. Khatuntsev, et al.,

PRIZMA status

. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 82, 116-120(2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.09.006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[30] Neutron Source (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), see https://neutrons.ornl.gov/snsneutrons.ornl.gov/sns (accessed 11.07.2019).
[31] J. Knastera, F. Arbeiter, P. Carac, et al.

(2016) IFMIF, the European-Japanese efforts under the Broader Approach agreement towards a Li(d,xn) neutron source: Current status and future options

. Nuclear Materials and Energy, 9, 46-54(2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2016.04.012
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar