logo

First proof-of-principle experiment with the post-accelerated isotope separator on-line beam at BRIF: measurement of the angular distribution of 23Na + 40Ca elastic scattering

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

First proof-of-principle experiment with the post-accelerated isotope separator on-line beam at BRIF: measurement of the angular distribution of 23Na + 40Ca elastic scattering

Wei Nan
Bing Guo
Cheng-Jian Lin
Lei Yang
Dong-Xi Wang
Yang-Ping Shen
Bing Tang
Bao-Qun Cui
Tao Ge
Yin-Long Lyu
Hui-Ming Jia
Yun-Ju Li
Chen Chen
Li-Hua Chen
Qi-Wen Fan
Xin-Yue Li
Gang Lian
Jian-Cheng Liu
Tian-Peng Luo
Nan-Ru Ma
Rui-Gang Ma
Xie Ma
Ying-Jun Ma
Wei-Ke Nan
Dan-Yang Pang
You-Bao Wang
Pei-Wei Wen
Feng Yang
Yong-Jin Yao
Sheng Zeng
Hao Zhang
Fu-Peng Zhong
Shan-Hao Zhong
Zhi-Hong Li
Tian-Jue Zhang
Wei-Ping Liu
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.32, No.5Article number 53Published in print 01 May 2021Available online 24 May 2021
49103

The reaction dynamics of exotic nuclei near the drip line is one of the main research topics of current interest. Elastic scattering is a useful probe for investigating the size and surface diffuseness of exotic nuclei. The development of rare isotope accelerators offers opportunities for such studies. To date, many relevant measurements have been performed at accelerators using the projectile fragmentation technique, while the measurements at accelerators using isotope separator on-line (ISOL) systems are still quite scarce. In this work, we present the first proof-of-principle experiment with a post-accelerated ISOL beam at the Beijing Radioactive Ion Beam Facility (BRIF) by measuring the angular distribution of elastic scattering for the stable nucleus 23Na from the doubly magic nucleus 40Ca at energies above the Coulomb barrier. The angular distribution measured by a silicon strip detector array in a scattering chamber using the ISOL beam at BRIF is in good agreement with that measured by the high-precision Q3D magnetic spectrograph using the non-ISOL beam at nearly the same energy. This work provides useful background for making BRIF a powerful tool for the investigation of the reaction dynamics of exotic nuclei.

Video Abstract

BRIFExotic nucleiElastic scatteringAngular distribution

1 Introduction

Light loosely bound nuclei near the drip line are characterized by very low nucleon binding energies, typically one order of magnitude smaller than those for their stable counterparts located along the β-stability valley. These nuclei can exhibit exotic properties, such as a halo structure. The reaction dynamics of light exotic nuclei near the drip line is one of the main research topics of current interest and has attracted considerable interest in the low-energy nuclear physics community [1-3]. Elastic scattering is a useful probe for investigating the size and surface diffuseness of exotic nuclei by comparing the similarities and differences in the angular distributions of the reactions induced by loosely bound and tightly bound nuclei [4].

To date, several measurements have been made of the elastic-scattering angular distributions of neutron-rich nuclei, such as the 2n-halo nuclei 6He [5] and 11Li [6], neutron skin nucleus 8He [7, 8], 8Li [9], and the 1n-halo nucleus 11Be [10-12]. In recent years, the elastic scattering of proton-rich nuclei has also been investigated (e.g., 7Be, 8B, 9C + Pb [4, 13, 14], 17F + 12C and 14N [15], 17F + 58Ni [16], 17F + 89Y [17], and 17F + 208Pb [18, 19]). These experiments have greatly deepened our understanding of the reaction dynamics and their interplay with the exotic structure of weakly bound nuclei. However, more investigations are needed.

The development of rare isotope accelerators offers opportunities to explore the structure of unstable exotic nuclei. There are two rare complementary isotope accelerators in China. One is the Radioactive Ion Beam Line in Lanzhou (RIBLL) [20] using the projectile fragmentation (PF) technique, which was established by the Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Since the delivery of the first beam in 1997, a series of experiments have been conducted for the study of, for example, the clustering structure in neutron-rich nuclei [21, 22], two-proton emission in proton-rich nuclei [23, 24], and revalidation of the isobaric multiplet mass equation [25]. In addition, the elastic-scattering angular distributions of a few proton-rich nuclei [4, 13, 17] and the 1n-halo nucleus 11Be [12] have been measured using silicon detector arrays [26, 27] at RIBLL. The other accelerator is the Beijing Radioactive Ion Beam Facility (BRIF) [28, 29] using the isotope separator on-line (ISOL) technique, which was established by the China Institute of Atomic Energy. BRIF consists of a 100-MeV 200-μA compact proton cyclotron [30], an ISOL system with a mass resolution of 20,000 [31], and a 13-MV tandem accelerator for post-acceleration. BRIF was commissioned in 2015 and successfully produced a few unstable ion beams such as 20,21,22Na and 37,38K. Recently, the exotic βγα decay mode was directly observed for the first time with a pure 20Na ISOL beam at BRIF [32].

BRIF is a potential high-precision facility for investigating the nuclear reaction dynamics of unstable nuclei, as it can deliver almost pure unstable ion beams. However, an experiment with a post-accelerated ISOL beam at BRIF has not been performed to date. Therefore, a proof-of-principle experiment with a post-accelerated stable 23Na beam is highly desirable. For this purpose, the angular distribution of 23Na + 40Ca elastic scattering was measured using two techniques. One is based on a silicon detector array with a post-accelerated 23Na beam using the ISOL technique at BRIF (ISOL beam); the other is based on a high-precision Q3D spectrograph with the 23Na beam directly from the traditional negative-ion source and accelerated by the HI-13 tandem accelerator (non-ISOL beam). The excellent consistency of these two results demonstrates that BRIF can be a powerful tool for investigating the reaction dynamics of exotic nuclei.

2 Experimental setup and procedure

The experiment with the post-accelerated ISOL beam was performed at BRIF. First, a non-ISOL 23Na beam directly from an ion source was accelerated by the HI-13 tandem accelerator as the pilot beam and transported to the R60 scattering target chamber to determine the beam optics. Second, the proton cyclotron served as the driving accelerator. The 23Na beam was then produced with a 100-MeV 10-eμA proton beam from the cyclotron bombarding the MgO target. Reaction products diffusing out of the thick target were ionized by an ion source and separated by a two-stage ISOL system for subsequent post-acceleration. Finally, the ISOL 23Na beam was accelerated by using the HI-13 tandem accelerator and transported to the R60 scattering target chamber for the angular distribution measurement with the same optical systems as used for the pilot beam. The energy and the current of the ISOL 23Na beam were 83.25 MeV and 0.5 enA, respectively.

The setup of the target chamber is illustrated in Fig. 1. Two micro-channel plates (MCPs), which can present a fast timing signal, were used to measure the time of flight (TOF) of the beam. A quadrant silicon detector (QSD) with a thickness of 1000 μm, which was placed at the end of the target chamber, was used to measure the total energy of the beam. The ISOL beam from BRIF can be confirmed by a combination of the TOF and energy. After the development of the 23Na beam was confirmed, the upstream MCP and QSD were removed to avoid interference with the measurement of the angular distribution, while the downstream MCP was left to monitor the beam. The target was made by evaporation of natural CaF2 with a thickness of 118 μg/cm2 on a 200 μg/cm2 thick Au foil. The silicon detector array was placed 10 cm downstream of the target. The detector array consists of four detector telescopes, as shown in Fig. 2. The first and second layers of each telescope are two single-sided silicon strip detectors (SSSDs) with thicknesses of 20 and 300 μm, respectively. Each SSSD has a typical energy resolution of 0.3% and has 16 strips with a width of 3 mm, spaced 0.1 mm apart. These two SSSDs were placed in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. The third layer is a QSD with a thickness of 1000 μm and an area of 50 × 50 mm2 for potential light reaction products such as protons and α particles. Such a configuration can identify reaction products, including light and heavy ions. The angular coverage range of the present detector array in the laboratory system ranges from 10.2° to 39.6°, as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 1
(Color online) Experimental setup in the target chamber. The two MCPs and the QSD were used to identify the beam. A silicon detector array was used to detect emitted particles.
pic
Fig. 2
(Color online) Setup of the silicon detector array. The detector array consists of four detector telescopes. Each detector telescope contains three layers of silicon detectors with thicknesses of 20, 300, and 1000 μm, respectively. See the text for further details.
pic
Fig. 3
(Color online) Angular coverage of the detector array. θ and ϕ are the angles used in the spherical coordinate system. The array covers the scattering angle θ, ranging from 10.2° to 39.6°.
pic

In this experiment, the energy of the 23Na beam at the center of the target was 82.8 MeV. The scattered 23Na ions were detected in the first two layers of the telescope. The 20-μm-thick SSSD was used for the measurement of energy loss ΔE, while a 300-μm-thick SSSD was used to measure the residual energy Er. The experimental spectra of the scattered 23Na particles from 40Ca and 197Au are shown in Fig. 4. Both the two-dimensional spectrum of energy loss versus the total energy and the one-dimensional spectrum of the total energy are presented. The 23Na particles from 40Ca can be clearly distinguished from those from 197Au.

Fig. 4
(Color online) Energy spectra of the scattered 23Na particles from 40Ca and 197Au. (a) Two-dimensional spectrum of energy loss ΔE versus total energy Etot. (b) One-dimensional spectrum of total energy.
pic

To verify the ISOL-based technique at BRIF, the same angular distribution was also measured with a well-developed technique using a high-precision Q3D spectrograph with the non-ISOL 23Na beam directly from the traditional negative-ion source and accelerated by the HI-13 tandem accelerator at the China Institute of Atomic Energy. The experimental setup and procedures were identical to those reported in our previous work [33, 34]. The experimental target was made by evaporation of natural CaF2 with a thickness of 18 μg/cm2 on a 30 μg/cm2 thick Au foil. In this experiment, the energy of the 23Na beam was 84 MeV, and its energy at the center of the target was 83.9 MeV (which was almost the same as the measurement at BRIF).

3 Data analysis and results

The differential cross section of a reaction can be expressed as

σ=NINsΩ, (1)

where N and I represent the numbers of emitted ions and incident ions, respectively, Ns denotes the number of target atoms per unit area, and Ω represents the solid angle. In the present work, we used a relative measurement method to reduce the uncertainties from the solid angle and beam intensity. The cross section of 23Na + 197Au elastic scattering at the present energy is equal to the Rutherford cross section; therefore, the ratio of the measured 23Na + 40Ca elastic-scattering cross section to the corresponding Rutherford cross section can be calculated by using

dσ/dσrCa=NCa×NsAu×dσrAuNAu×NsCa×dσrCa, (2)

where NCa and NAu are the numbers of the scattered 23Na ions from 40Ca and 197Au, respectively; NsCa and NsAu are the numbers of Ca and Au atoms per unit area of the target, respectively; and dσrCa and dσrAu are the Rutherford differential cross sections of 23Na + 40Ca and 23Na + 197Au, respectively. It can be seen that the uncertainties from the solid angle and beam intensity can be removed through the present relative measurement method.

In Fig. 5, we show the experimental angular distribution of 23Na + 40Ca elastic scattering with the ISOL-based technique at BRIF and a well-developed technique at a high-precision Q3D spectrograph, together with the optical model calculations with the single-folding potential [35]. These two experimental results were in good agreement. This presents strong evidence that BRIF can be used for such measurements.

Fig. 5
(Color online) Angular distribution of 23Na + 40Ca elastic scattering. The red points are the results obtained using the ISOL-based technique at BRIF, while the blue points represent those obtained with the well-developed technique using a high-precision Q3D spectrograph. The solid and dashed curves stand for the optical model (OM) calculations at 82.8 and 83.9 MeV, respectively.
pic

4 Conclusion and perspective

In this work, we performed the first proof-of-principle experiment with a post-accelerated 23Na beam using the ISOL technique at BRIF (ISOL beam) by measuring the angular distribution of 23Na + 40Ca elastic scattering. In addition, we measured the same angular distribution with a well-developed technique using a high-precision Q3D spectrograph with a 23Na beam from the HI-13 tandem accelerator (non-ISOL beam). These two results are in excellent agreement, demonstrating that BRIF can be a powerful tool for future investigation of the reaction dynamics of exotic nuclei.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no elastic-scattering data for unstable sodium isotopes 20,21,22Na on the doubly magic nucleus 40Ca. To explore the exotic properties of these unstable sodium isotopes, we plan to measure the angular distribution of 21,22Na + 40Ca elastic scattering at BRIF using the same technique described in this work in the near future.

References
[1] N. Keeleya, R. Raabe, N. Alamanos et al.,

Fusion and direct reactions of halo nuclei at energies around the Coulomb barrier

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 579 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2007.02.002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] N. Keeleya, N. Alamanos, K. W. Kemper et al.,

Elastic scattering and reactions of light exotic beams

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 396 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2009.05.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] B. B. Back, H. Esbensen, C. L. Jiang et al.,

Recent developments in heavy-ion fusion reactions

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 317 (2014). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.317
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] Y. Y. Yang, J. S. Wang, Q. Wang et al.,

Elastic scattering of the proton drip-line nucleus 8B off a natPb target at 170.3 MeV

. Phys. Rev. C 87, 044613 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.044613
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] L. Acosta, A. M. Sanchez-Benitez, M. E. Gomez et al.,

Elastic scattering and α-particle production in 6He+208Pb collisions at 22 MeV

. Phys. Rev. C 84, 044604 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.044604
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] M. Cubero, J. P. Fernandez-Garcia, M. Rodriguez-Gallardo et al.,

Do Halo Nuclei Follow Rutherford Elastic Scattering at Energies Below the Barrier? The Case of 11Li

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 262701 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.262701
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] A. Lemasson, A. Shrivastava, A. Navin et al.,

Modern Rutherford experiment: Tunneling of the most neutron-rich nucleus

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 232701 (2009). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.232701
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] G. Marquínez-Durán, I. Martel, A. M. Sanchez-Benitez et al.,

Precise measurement of near-barrier 8He+208Pb elastic scattering: Comparison with 6He

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 064618 (2016). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.064618
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] K. J. Cook, I. P. Carter, E. C. Simpson et al.,

Interplay of charge clustering and weak binding in reactions of 8Li

. Phys. Rev. C 97, 021601(R) (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.021601
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] A. Di Pietro, G. Randisi, V. Scuderi et al.,

Elastic scattering and reaction mechanisms of the halo nucleus 11Be around the Coulomb barrier

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 022701 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.022701
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] V. Pesudo, M. J. G. Borge, A. M. Moro et al.,

Scattering of the halo nucleus 11Be on 197Au at energies around the Coulomb barrier

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 152502 (2017). doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.152502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] F. F. Duan, Y. Y. Yang, K. Wang et al.,

Scattering of the halo nucleus 11Be from a lead target at 3.5 times the Coulomb barrier energy

. Phys. Lett. B 811, 135942 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135942
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] Y. Y. Yang, X. Liu, D. Y. Pang et al.,

Elastic scattering of the proton drip line nuclei 7Be, 8B, and 9C on a lead target at energies around three times the Coulomb barriers

. Phys. Rev. C 98, 044608 (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044608
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] M. Mazzocco, N. Keeley, A. Boiano et al.,

Elastic scattering for the 8B and 7Be+208Pb systems at near-Coulomb barrier energies

. Phys. Rev. C 100, 024602 (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024602
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] J. C. Blackmon, F. Carstoiu, L. Trache et al.,

Elastic scattering of the proton drip-line nucleus 17F

. Phys. Rev. C 72, 034606 (2005). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.034606
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] L. Yang, C. J. Lin, H. Yamaguchi et al.,

Insight into the reaction dynamics of proton drip-line nuclear system 17F + 58Ni at near-barrier energies

. Phys. Lett. B 813, 136045 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136045
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] G. L. Zhang, G. X. Zhang, C. J. Lin et al.,

Angular distribution of elastic scattering induced by 17F on medium-mass target nuclei at energies near the Coulomb barrier

. Phys. Rev. C 97, 044618 (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044618
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] J. F. Liang, J. R. Beene, H. Esbensen et al.,

Elastic scattering and breakup of 17F at 10 MeV/nucleon

. Phys. Rev. C 65, 051603(R) (2002). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.65.051603
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] M. Romoli, E. Vardaci, M. Di Pietro et al.,

Measurements of 17F scattering by 208Pb with a new type of large solid angle detector array

. Phys. Rev. C 69, 064614 (2004). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.69.064614
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] Z. Sun, W.-L. Zhan, Z.-Y. Guo et al.,

the radioactive ion beam line in Lanzhou

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 503, 496 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01005-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] Z. H. Yang, Y. L. Ye, Z. H. Li et al.,

Observation of enhanced monopole strength and clustering in 12Be

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 162501 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.162501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] Y. Liu, Y. L. Ye, J. L. Lou et al.,

Positive-parity linear-chain molecular band in 16C

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 192501 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.192501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] X. X. Xu, C. J. Lin, L. J. Sun et al.,

Observation of β-delayed two-proton emission in the decay of 22Si

. Phys. Lett. B 766, 312 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.028
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] Y. T. Wang, D. Q. Fang, K. Wang et al.,

Observation of β-delayed 2He emission from the proton-rich nucleus 22Al

. Phys. Lett. B 784, 12 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.034
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] J. Su, W. P. Liu, N. T. Zhang et al.,

Revalidation of the isobaric multiplet mass equation at A=53, T=3/2

. Phys. Lett. B 756, 323 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.024
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] G. L. Zhang, Y. J. Yao, G. X. Zhang et al.,

A detector setup for the measurement of angular distribution of heavy-ion elastic scattering with low energy on RIBLL

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 104 (2017). doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0249-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[27] F. F. Duan, Y. Y. Yang, B. T. Hu et al.,

Silicon detector array for radioactive beam experiments at HIRFL-RIBLL

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 29, 165 (2018). doi: 10.1007/s41365-018-0499-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[28] W.P. Liu, Z.H. Li, X.X. Bai et al.,

Current progress of nuclear astrophysics study and BRNBF at CIAE

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 204, 62 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01892-X
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[29] B. Guo, W. P. Liu,

Beijing radioactive ion beam facility and basic nuclear physics research prospects (in Chinese)

. Chin Sci Bull, 2015, 60: 1820-1827, doi: 10.1360/N972014-01209
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[30] T. J. Zhang, Z. G. Li, Z. G. Yin et al.,

Design & construction status of CYCIAE-100, a 100 MeV H- cyclotron for RIB production

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 266, 4117 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.021
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[31] B. Q. Cui, Z. H. Peng, Y. J. Ma et al.,

Status of Beijing radioactive ion beam facility

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 266, 4113 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.154
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[32] Y. B. Wang, J. Su, Z. Y. Han et al.,

Direct observation of the exotic β-γ-α decay mode in the Tz = −1 nucleus 20Na

. Phys. Rev. C 103, L011301 (2021). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.L011301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[33] Y. P. Shen, B. Guo, and T. L. Ma,

First experimental constraint of the spectroscopic amplitudes for the α-cluster in the 11B ground state

. Phys. Lett. B 797, 134820 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134820
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[34] Y. P. Shen, B. Guo, and R. J. deBoer,

Constraining the External Capture to the 16O Ground State and the E2 S Factor of the 12C(α, γ)16O Reaction

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 162701 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.162701
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[35] D. Y. Pang, Y. L. Ye, and F. R. Xu,

Application of the Bruyeres Jeukenne-Lejeune-Mahaux model potential to composite nuclei with a single-folding approach

. Phys. Rev. C 83, 064619 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.064619
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar