1. Introduction
These attenuation coefficients are extensively used in shielding and dosimetric computations which are strongly dependent on the energy of photon and composition of elements of interacting medium. The knowledge of attenuation in tissues is also useful in the mammographic examination which is the most effective method for early diagnosis of breast cancer. The attenuation coefficient and effective atomic number are fundamental parameters in radiology. Literature survey shows that there were several works on theoretical and measurements of mass attenuation coefficients of dosimetric interest [1-3].
Hubble and Seltzer [4] was given attenuation coefficients data for the elements and compounds. Berger and Hubbel [2] developed software called XCOM for calculating mass attenuation coefficients. Gerward et al.,[5] developed WinXCom programme to calculate mass attenuation coefficients. Hine [6] introduced the concept of Zeff. This parameter is useful in selecting a tissue substitute. A literature survey shows that some researchers have measured or calculated effective atomic number in biological materials [7-9].
Kurudirek and Onaran [10] studied the Zeff of biomolecules for electron, proton, alpha particle, and photon interactions. Kurudirek [11] also studied Zeff and Ne of human tissues. The same workers [12] also studiedZeff of dosimetric materials for different interactions. Previous workers [13-18] measured the X-ray and gamma interaction parameters in some compounds of dosimetric interest. We also reported theoretical studies on the X-ray and gamma interaction parameters of biological samples [19-26].
Tissue equivalent materials are required for dose distribution studies in the radiotherapy and diagnoisis. The photon interaction parameters in the tissues of human organs are important for the preparation of tissue equivalent materials. The tissue equivalent materials and tissues should have a similar behaviour with photons.
In the present work, we have proposed a new semi empirical formulae for photon interaction parameters such as mass attenuation coefficient, mass energy absorption coefficient, and effective atomic number in different tissues of human organs (Kidney, Liver, Lung, Lymph, Muscle, Ovary, Pancreas, Cartilage, Red marrow, Spongiosa, Yellow marrow, Skin, Spleen, Testis, Thyroid, Skeleton-cortical bone, Skeleton-cranium Skeleton-femur, Skeleton-humerus, Skeleton-mandible, Skeleton-ribs (2nd, 6th), Skeleton-ribs (10th), Skeleton-sacrum, Skeleton-spongiosa, Skeleton-vertibral column (c4), and Skeleton-vertibral column (D6, L3)). In the second section of the paper, we have explained the proposed empirical formula. The third section of the paper describes the comparison of experimental results with present work.
2. Methodology
2.1 Semi empirical formula for effective atomic number (Zeff) in terms of composition
To establish the exact relation between effective atomic number and composition, we have introduced a new parameter called effective composition index (Ceff). In general, it is the ratio of the sum of the product of composition and atomic weight of elements in large proportion to one plus the sum of the product of composition and atomic weight of remaining elements. The major elements present in the tissues of human organs are H, C, N, and O. Thus effective composition index (Ceff) for tissues of human organ is defined as the ratio between the sum of the product of composition and atomic weight of H, C, N, and O to one plus sum of the product of composition and atomic weight of remaing elements in the tissue.
In the above equation, CH, CC, CN, CO, CCa, CP, CNa, CMg, CS, CCI, CK, CFe, and CI are composition of the elements indicated in the corresponding subscripts. AH, AC, AN, AO, ACa, AP, ANa, AMg, AS, ACl, AK, AFe and AI are atomic weight of the elements indicated in the corresponding subscripts. In the numerator of the above equation, we have considered the composition and atomic weight of H, C, N, and O because these elements are major elemental contents of tissue.
In the denominator, remaining elemental composition is considered.
The equation of effective composition index (Ceff) for a single element is reduced to
We have calculated the effective composition index (Ceff) for all tissues of human organs. A search was made for their best parametrization with the effective atomic number. Finally we have established relation between effective atomic number (Zeff) and effective composition index (Ceff).
In the above Eq. (3), E represents photon energy in MeV. Effective atomic number can be calculated with the simple inputs of photon energy (E) and effective composition index (Ceff). The effective composition index can be calculated using their composition. Thus, Eq. (3) represents the simple semi empirical formula which produces the effective atomic number using their composition.
2.2 Semi empirical formula for of mass attenuation and energy absorption coefficients
Most of the tissues of human organs consisting of elements such as H, C, N, O, Ca, P, Na, Mg, S, Cl, K, Fe, and I are in their elemental composition. We have studied the variation of mass attenuation and energy absorption coefficients with atomic number at different energies for the elements which are constitutes of tissues of human organs. We have studied the variation of the mass attenuation coefficient (μ/ρ) with energy and atomic number. It is observed from this study that the mass attenuation coefficients (μ/ρ) do not vary linearly with energy and atomic number. To select the best fit for mass attenuation coefficients in the low energy region (1-100 keV), we have studied suitable functions such as
here αi, βi and δi are fitting parametrs which are given in Table 1.
i=0 | i=1 | i=2 | i=3 | i=4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
αi | 10757.14872 | - 3540.820395 | 398.4373505 | -4.461736803 | 0 |
βi | - 3.343463789 | 6.12684539·10-2 | - 2.825112754·10-3 | 4.967048249·10-5 | 0 |
δi | 0.4320534583 | - 8.406094275·10-2 | 8.3504118·10-3 | - 3.691850298·10-4 | 5.714514667·10-6 |
We have also formulated the equation for the mass attenuation coefficient (μ/ρ) and the product of energy and atomic number in the energy region 100 keV to 20 MeV for elements H, C, N, O, Ca, P, Na, Mg, S, Cl, K, Fe, and I
We have also fit the following non linear function to mass attenuation coefficients (μen/ρ) in the low energy region (1-100 keV) for elements H, C, N, O, Ca, P, Na, Mg, S, Cl, K, Fe, and I;
here φi, ψi and χi are fitting parameters which are given in Table 2.
Φi | Ψi | Χi | |
---|---|---|---|
i=0 | - 6183.518517 | - 3.356499096 | 3.445436562·10-1 |
i=1 | 9775.049268 | + 5.501861004·10-2 | 7.017102505·10-2 |
i=2 | - 4419.256446 | 1.769339873·10-2 | - 7.455569824·10-2 |
i=3 | 928.8872984 | - 6.915457646·10-3 | 1.881469124·10-2 |
i=4 | - 99.72245142 | + 9.55841425·10-4 | - 2.214979366·10-3 |
i=5 | + 5.829884688 | - 6.382510627·10-5 | 1.346734218·10-4 |
i=6 | - 0.173724236 | 2.059213322·10-6 | - 4.080025291·10-6 |
i=7 | 2.05344172·10-3 | -2.563187022·10-8 | 4.856052612·10-8 |
The proposed formula for the mass energy absorption coefficient (μen/ρ), and the product of the energy and atomic number in the energy region 100 keV to 20 MeV for elements H, C, N, O, Ca, P, Na, Mg, S, Cl, K, Fe and I is;
The mass attenuation coefficient and mass energy absorption coefficient of tissues of human organs at different energies can be expressed by substituting Z=Zeff in above Eqs. (1) and (2):
and
Above Eqs. (3) and (4) are simple semi empirical formulae which represent the mass attenuation coefficient (μ/ρ) and mass energy absorption coefficient (μen/ρ) in terms of the effective atomic number (Zeff) of tissues. In the above Eqs. (3) and (4), E represents photon energy in keV. Both these coefficients can be calculated with the simple input of effective atomic number (Zeff) at a given energy.
3. Results and discussions
Based on the composition [32] of elements in the tissues of human organs, we have formulated an equivalent chemical formula. The proposed equivalent chemical formula for tissues of human organs is shown in Table 3. We have calculated mass attenuation coefficients (μ/ρ), mass energy abosorption coefficients (μen/ρ), and effective atomic numbers using the formulae proposed in the present work. The variation of mass energy abosorption coefficients (μen/ρ) with energy for different tissues of human organs for a wide energy range 1 keV-20 MeV is shown in Figs. 1, 2, 3. It also observed a similar variation of mass attenuation coefficients (μ/ρ) with photon energy. The calculated effective atomic numbers of the tissues of human organs for a wide energy range 1 keV-20 MeV are also shown in Figs. 4, 5, 6. We have also highlighted the average value, maximum value, minimum value, and standard deviation of the calculated effective atomic number of tissues of human organs for a wide energy range 1 keV-20 MeV. These values are also presented in Table 4.
Tissue | Chemical formula |
---|---|
Adipose tissue | H4010C1765N18O616Na2S1Cl1 |
Blood | H5652C511N132O2600P2Na2S3Cl5K3Fe1 |
Brain | H1702C194N25O713P2Na2S3Cl5K3 |
Breast | H3729C980N76O1168P1Na2Cl1 |
Cell Nucleus | H843C60N18O372P7S1 |
Eye Lens | H3377C576N144O1431P1Na2S3Cl1 |
GI tract | H4112C374N61O1835P1Na2S1Cl2K1 |
Heart | H5707C563N128O2562P2Na2S3Cl5K3Fe1 |
Kidney | H4096C440N86O1814Ca1P3Na3S2Cl2K2 |
Liver | H1764C205N38O793P2Na2S2Cl1K1 |
Lung | H1998C171N43O915P2Na2S2Cl2K1 |
Lymph | H3436C109N25O1667Na4S1Cl4 |
Muscle | H3588C422N86O1573P2Na2S3Cl1K4 |
Ovary | H2037C151N33O938P1Na2S1Cl1K1 |
Pancreas | H3372C451N50O1391P2Na3S1Cl2K2 |
Cartilage | H1126C97N19O550P8Na3S3Cl1 |
Red marrow | H5818C1925N136O1532 |
Spongiosa | H4710C1878N112O1281Ca103P61Na2Mg2S3Cl3K1Fe1 |
Yellow marrow | H4045C1901N18O512Na2S1Cl1 |
Skin | H3879C664N117O1576P1Na3S2Cl3K1 |
Spleen | H2349C216N53O1065P2Na1Cl1K2 |
Testis | H3257C255N44O1483P1Na3S2Cl2K2 |
Thyroid | H13095C1257N217O5909P4Na11S4Cl7K3I1 |
Skeleton cortical bone | H776C297N69O625Ca129P76Na1Mg2S2 |
Skeleton cranium | H1140C406N66O625Ca101P60Na1Mg2 |
Skeleton femur | H2462C1018N71O815Ca114P63Na2Mg1S1Cl2l1 |
Skeleton humerus | H1447C635N54O561Ca92P55Na1Mg1S2 |
Skeleton mandible | H1049C381N67O625Ca107P64Na1Mg2S2 |
Skeleton ribs (2nd,6th) | H2483C856N109O1065Ca128P76Na2Mg2S4Cl1l1 |
Skeleton ribs (10th) | H2172C765N112O1061Ca152P91Na2Mg2S4Cl1K1 |
Skeleton sacrum | H4100C1404N148O1529Ca137P81Mg2S3Cl2K1Fe1 |
Skeleton spongiosa | H4710C1878N112O1281Ca103P61Na2Mg2S3Cl3K1Fe1 |
Skeleton vertebral column (C4) | H3491C1214N155O1522Ca185P110Na2Mg2S5Cl2K1Fe1 |
Skeleton vertebral column (D6, L3) | H3879C1334N152O1525Ca155P92Mg2S3Cl2K1Fe1 |
Tissue | Zeff | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Average | Max. | Min. | SD | |
Adipose | 3.520 | 5.301 | 3.074 | 0.497 |
Blood | 4.054 | 6.224 | 3.448 | 0.648 |
Brain | 3.956 | 6.168 | 3.354 | 0.652 |
Breast | 3.946 | 6.455 | 3.310 | 0.736 |
Cartilage | 4.227 | 6.511 | 3.578 | 0.692 |
Cell nucleus | 4.037 | 6.339 | 3.401 | 0.687 |
Eye lens | 4.069 | 6.094 | 3.506 | 0.598 |
Gi tract | 3.972 | 6.121 | 3.379 | 0.635 |
Heart | 4.032 | 6.217 | 3.427 | 0.651 |
Kidney | 4.021 | 6.185 | 3.422 | 0.643 |
Liver | 4.037 | 6.203 | 3.437 | 0.644 |
Lung deflated | 4.041 | 6.215 | 3.435 | 0.649 |
Lymph | 3.996 | 6.200 | 3.381 | 0.617 |
Muscle | 4.031 | 6.200 | 3.434 | 0.642 |
Ovary | 4.012 | 6.190 | 3.407 | 0.648 |
Pancreas | 3.941 | 6.095 | 3.357 | 0.635 |
Red marrow | 3.789 | 5.819 | 3.269 | 0.576 |
Skeleton cortical bone | 7.283 | 10.949 | 5.994 | 1.335 |
Skeleton cranium | 6.196 | 9.896 | 5.009 | 1.289 |
Skeleton femur | 5.182 | 8.793 | 4.159 | 1.181 |
Skeleton humerus | 5.618 | 9.295 | 4.512 | 1.244 |
Skeleton mandible | 6.432 | 10.132 | 5.216 | 1.306 |
Skeleton ribs(2nd,6th) | 5.446 | 9.035 | 4.391 | 1.193 |
Skeleton ribs(10th) | 5.854 | 9.496 | 4.721 | 1.250 |
Skeleton sacrum | 4.979 | 8.352 | 4.039 | 1.088 |
Skeleton spongiosa | 4.540 | 7.751 | 3.705 | 0.995 |
Skeleton vertibral column | 5.468 | 9.076 | 4.426 | 1.165 |
Skeleton vertibral column | 8.009 | 10.230 | 7.350 | 0.771 |
Skin | 4.008 | 6.095 | 3.437 | 0.613 |
Spleen | 4.032 | 6.194 | 3.430 | 0.644 |
Spongiosa | 4.540 | 7.751 | 3.705 | 0.995 |
Testis | 4.076 | 6.553 | 3.405 | 0.742 |
Thyroid | 4.002 | 6.096 | 3.411 | 0.590 |
Yellow marrow | 3.476 | 5.227 | 3.045 | 0.483 |
-201903/1001-8042-30-03-001/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-03-001-F001.jpg)
-201903/1001-8042-30-03-001/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-03-001-F002.jpg)
-201903/1001-8042-30-03-001/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-03-001-F003.jpg)
-201903/1001-8042-30-03-001/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-03-001-F004.jpg)
-201903/1001-8042-30-03-001/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-03-001-F005.jpg)
-201903/1001-8042-30-03-001/alternativeImage/1001-8042-30-03-001-F006.jpg)
To verify the validity of the proposed formulae, we have compared the values produced by present work with that of experimental values available in literature. The comparison of mass attenuation coefficients produced by the present formulae with that of experimental values is shown in the Table 5. From this table, it is clear that the values produced by the present formulae agree well with the experiments. In the first stage of the work, we have established the relation between effective atomic number and elemental composition of tissues. The proposed new parameter effective composition index (Ceff) helps in achieving an accurate relation between effective atomic number and elemental composition of the tissue at a given energy. In the second stage, we have established the exact relation between effective atomic number, mass attenuation coefficients (μ/ρ) and mass energy abosorption coefficients (μen/ρ). Hence, this set of simple formulae produces mass attenuation coefficients (μ/ρ) and mass energy abosorption coefficients (μen/ρ) from the elemental composition at a given energy.
Tissue | Energy (keV) | Mass attenuation coefficient (cm2/g) | Tissue | Energy (keV) | Mass attenuation coefficient(cm2/g) | Winxcom[5] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experimental values[10] | Present work | Winxcom[5] | Experimental values[10] | Present work | |||||
Adipose | 8 | 6.0000[27] | 5.560 | 5.501 | Pancreas | 27 | 0.4192[29] | 0.4156 | 0.410 |
11 | 2.4000[27] | 2.596 | 4.90 | 60 | 0.20673[29] | 0.2027 | 0.203 | ||
15 | 1.0295[27] | 1.118 | 1.10 | 122 | 0.1586[29] | 0.1601 | 0.162 | ||
20 | 0.5200 [27] | 0.569 | 0.510 | 279 | 0.1211[29] | 0.1175 | 0.110 | ||
30 | 0.2947[27] | 0.387 | 0.318 | 662 | 0.08615[29] | 0.0749 | 0.079 | ||
Liver | 30 | 0.3868[28] | 0.429 | 0.410 | Lung | 27 | 0.32285[29] | 0.3347 | 0.330 |
40 | 0.2821[28] | 0.218 | 0.250 | 60 | 0.15904[29] | 0.1548 | 0.150 | ||
50 | 0.2415[28] | 0.203 | 0.250 | 122 | 0.11714[29] | 0.1352 | 0.131 | ||
60 | 0.2198[28] | 0.199 | 0.210 | 279 | 0.08667[29] | 0.089 | 0.080 | ||
70 | 0.2145[28] | 0.181 | 0.190 | 662 | 0.06267[29] | 0.066 | 0.065 | ||
80 | 0.1962[28] | 0.171 | 0.180 | Kidney | 27 | 0.4323[29] | 0.4369 | 0.421 | |
90 | 0.19056[28] | 0.166 | 0.170 | 60 | 0.208[29] | 0.2062 | 0.210 | ||
100 | 0.1887[28] | 0.161 | 0.160 | 122 | 0.157[29] | 0.1601 | 0.159 | ||
110 | 0.1557[28] | 0.159 | 0.151 | 279 | 0.121[29] | 0.1370 | 0.135 | ||
662 | 0.085[29] | 0.0909 | 0.089 | ||||||
Kidney | 30 | 0.3705[28] | 0.388 | 0.380 | Breast | 8 | 9.157[30] | 8.708 | 8.501 |
40 | 0.2657[28] | 0.245 | 0.250 | 10 | 5.392[30] | 4.454 | 4.100 | ||
50 | 0.2343[28] | 0.221 | 0.231 | 12 | 3.382[30] | 2.91 | 3.103 | ||
60 | 0.2076[28] | 0.197 | 0.205 | 14 | 2.098[30] | 1.811 | 2.103 | ||
70 | 0.1895[28] | 0.196 | 0.191 | Bone | 140 | 0.1255[31] | 0.130 | 0.129 | |
80 | 0.19142[28] | 0.190 | 0.190 | 364 | 0.10104[31] | 0.118 | 0.101 | ||
90 | 0.1838[28] | 0.171 | 0.170 | 662 | 0.0667[31] | 0.083 | 0.070 | ||
100 | 0.1667[28] | 0.177 | 0.175 | Muscle | 140 | 0.1495[31] | 0.142 | 0.141 | |
110 | 0.1876[28] | 0.173 | 0.172 | 364 | 0.09143[31] | 0.102 | 0.090 | ||
662 | 0.0771[31] | 0.091 | 0.082 | ||||||
Brain | 27 | 0.43365[28] | 0.421 | 0.410 | Liver | 27 | 0.416[29] | 0.410 | 0.410 |
60 | 0.2096[28] | 0.224 | 0.210 | 60 | 0.2085[29] | 0.209 | 0.210 | ||
122 | 0.1644[28] | 0.154 | 0.145 | 122 | 0.1557[29] | 0.1607 | 0.154 | ||
279 | 0.1231[28] | 0.122 | 0.132 | 279 | 0.1188[29] | 0.1276 | 0.112 | ||
662 | 0.0872[28] | 0.103 | 0.080 | 662 | 0.0849[29] | 0.0782 | 0.078 |
4. Conclusion
The proposed semi empirical formulae of mass attenuation coefficients (μ/ρ), mass energy abosorption coefficients (μen/ρ), and effective atomic number for tissues of human organs in the energy range 1 keV-20 MeV produce values which agree well with experiments. This formulae is the first of its kind and it is useful in radiotherapy and medical physics.
Photon absorptiometric studies of elements, mixtures and substances of biomedical interest
. Phys. Med. Biol. 31,267-273 (1986),.doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/31/3/005X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials
. Phys.Med. Biol. 43, 1367e1377 (1998), doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/5/026Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1e20MeV for elements Z= 1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest
. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Physical Reference Data, 5632. (1995), http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/cover.htmlNBSIR 87-3597, National institute of standards and technology, Gaithersburg, MD,USA
, https://www.nist.govWinXCom—a program for calculating X-ray attenuation coefficients
. Rad. Phy. Chem. 71, 653-654 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.040The effective atomic number of material for various γ interaction
, Phys. Rev 85, 725-730 (1952).Effective atomic number for low-energy total photon interactions in human tissues Med
. Phys. 14, 759-763 (1987). DOI: 10.1118/1.596000Interaction of low energy photons with biological samples and effective atomic number
. Med. Phys. 12, 745-748 (1985), DOI: 10.1118/1.595658Effective atomic numbers and electron densities of some biologically important compounds containing H, C, N and O in the energy range 145–1330 keV J
. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39, 3969-81 (2006) doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/39/18/025/metaCalculation of effective atomic number and electron density of essential biomolecules for electron, proton, alpha particle and multi-energetic photon interactions
, Rad. Phys. Chem. 112, 125-138 (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.03.034Effective atomic numbers and electron densities of some human tissues and dosimetric materials for mean energies of various radiation sources relevant to radiotherapy and medical applications
, Rad. Phys. Chem. 102, 139-146 (2014), DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.04.033Investigation of the effective atomic numbers of dosimetric materials for electrons, protons and alpha particles using a direct method in the energy region 10 keV–1 GeV: a comparative study
, Rad. Env. Bio. Phys 54, 481-492 (2015) doi: 10.1007/s00411-015-0606-5Influence of gamma irradiation on conductivity of YBa2Cu3O7
. Rad. Phy. Chem. 113, 24-27 (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.04.010A study of shielding properties of X-ray and gamma in barium compounds
. J. Rad. Prot. Res. 42, 26-32 (2017), doi: 10.14407/jrpr.2017.42.1.26A study of gamma attenuation parameters in poly methyl methacrylate and Kapton
. Rad. Phy. Chem. 137, 254-259 (2016),DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.01.024A study of photon interaction parameters in barium compounds
. Annal. Nucl. Ener. 109, 310-317 (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.05.042Measurement of absorbed dose rate of gamma radiation for lead compounds
. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 619, 171-173 (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2009.11.026Study of gamma attenuation properties of tungsten copper alloys
, Int. J. Nucl. Ener. Sci. and Tech. 10, 356-368 (2016), doi: 10.1504/IJNEST.2016.082005Study of effective atomic number and electron density for tissues from human organs in the energy range of 1 keV–100 GeV
. Health Phy.104, 158-162 (2013), doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31827132e3.Study of Zeff for DNA, RNA and Retina by numerical methods
. Rad. Protect. Dosim.128, 294-298 (2008), doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm382Computation of CT-number and Zeff in Teeth
. Health Phy. 100, S92-S99 (2011), doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f508acA study of photon interaction parameters in lung tissue substitutes
. J. Med. Phy. 39, 112-5 (2014), doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.131286.Beta Bremsstrahlung dose in concrete shielding
. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 674, 74-78 (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.01.046Energy absorption and exposure build-up factors in hydroxyapatite
. Rad. Meas. 47, 364-370 (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.02.001Computation of exposure build-up factors in teeth
. Rad. Phy. Chem. 80, 14-21 (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.09.004Energy absorption build-up factors in teeth
. J. Radio. Nucl. Chem. 294, 251-260 (2012) doi: 10.1007/s10967-011-1490-3Experimental determination of linear attenuation coefficient of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues
, Radiat. Meas., 45, 1055-1059 (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.08.008X-ray coherent scattering form factors of tissues, water and plastics using energy dispersion
, Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 4377-4397 (2011), DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/010Measurement of linear attenuation coefficients of normal and malignant breast tissues using synchrotron radiation
. X-Ray Spectrum. 45, 185-189 (2016). doi: 10.1002/xrs.2685Measurement of attenuation coefficients for bone, muscle, fat and water at 140, 364 and 662 keV γ-ray energies
. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra. 102, 203-211 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2006.02.007