Introduction
Over the past two decades, several novel phenomena associated with strong electromagnetic fields in hot quantum chromodynamics (QCD) have been proposed, such as the chiral magnetic effect (CME) [1-6]. Such strong electromagnetic fields are expected to be generated during relativistic heavy-ion collisions; however, they are extremely challenging to measure experimentally. Several attempts have been made to detect strong electromagnetic fields in heavy ion collisions [7-10]. However, electromagnetic processes are obscured by strong hadronic interactions when nuclei collide. Conversely, ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions (UPCs) offer a distinctive advantage in observing electromagnetic processes, as the impact parameters in these collisions are more than twice the nuclear radius, preventing hadronic interactions [11-13]. Therefore, UPCs provide a unique opportunity to study strong electromagnetic processes in relativistic heavy ion collisions [11, 14].
In UPCs, fast-moving heavy ions are accompanied by intense photon fluxes due to their large electric charges and strong Lorentz-contracted electromagnetic fields. These fields are sufficiently strong to induce photonuclear and photon-photon interactions [11-13]. Many interesting results regarding particle production, including e++e- and π++π-, and vector mesons, such as ρ, ω, J/ψ have been reported in UPCs [15-21]. Thus, it is natural to assume that these strong electromagnetic fields could likewise have visible impacts on collision dynamics through the electromagnetic force.
The most important region for Coulomb dissociation is the giant dipole resonance (GDRs) [22] around a few MeVs. The photon-nuclear interaction in UPCs has a large cross-section to produce GDRs or excite nuclei to high-energy states [23, 24]. The GDRs typically decay by emitting photons and neutrons. The excitation energy of the GDRs is approximately 10-14 MeV for heavy nuclei and higher for lighter nuclei [23, 25-28]. The emitted neutrons have similar energies, which are considerably lower than the typical energy scales of relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Consequently, the emitted neutrons can be used to detect strong electromagnetic fields. In this study, we employed Monte (MC) simulations to demonstrate that the electromagnetic effect on neutron emission from Coulomb dissociation, primarily through GDRs decay, is sufficiently significant to be observed in UPCs. Our simulation incorporates the calculation of the strong electromagnetic field using Liénard-Wiechert potential, combined with neutron emission data from the existing experimental results and model simulations. Natural units
General idea
When two ions collide in the UPC, a strong electromagnetic field is generated. For instance, in a gold-gold (Au + Au) UPC with an impact parameter of b=20 fm [29] and a center-of-mass energy of
-202402/1001-8042-35-02-003/alternativeImage/1001-8042-35-02-003-F001.jpg)
However, the excitation energy of a typical GDRs is about 10-14 MeV for heavy nuclei [23]. Owing to the large GDR cross-section in photonuclear interactions, the exchange of photons between two colliding nuclei in a UPC event has a high probability of exciting one or both ions into GDRs or even higher excitations. GDRs can decay by emitting a single neutron, whereas higher-excitation resonances can decay by emitting two or more neutrons [23, 32, 33]. These neutrons have low momenta, approximately ~10 MeV, comparable to the transverse momentum shift, Δ p, induced by the electromagnetic force. Thus, strong electromagnetic fields may affect the momentum distribution of the emitted neutrons, such that their emission directions correlate with the direction of the impact parameter or the electromagnetic fields. Consequently, a back-to-back correlation may occur between the neutrons emitted from the two colliding nuclei. This provides a means of investigating strong electromagnetic fields in UPCs and offers a way to measure the direction of the impact parameter or electromagnetic field.
Electromagnetic fields
The electromagnetic fields can be calculated using the Liénard-Wiechert potentials, as described in Refs. [30, 34]. The electric and magnetic fields are expressed as follows:
For UPCs, around the collision time t = 0, Eq. (2) can be approximated as
Toy model simulation
To obtain more quantitative results, MC simulations are performed. We parameterize the nucleon density distribution of the nucleus using the Woods-Saxon function [35]:
Following the methodology of STARlight [15, 29, 36, 12], the probability of an UPC event associated with neutron emission (
Mutual Coulomb dissociation is measured at
In this study of the neutron emission, the Landau distribution is used to directly estimate the neutron multiplicity from the STAR experiment [39, 32]. As mentioned in Ref. [37], the measurement of spectra for secondary particles from photon-nuclear interactions is currently limited. Therefore, the neutron energies are generated using the same method as in the
Results and discussions
Figure 2 presents the simulation results. The
-202402/1001-8042-35-02-003/alternativeImage/1001-8042-35-02-003-F002.jpg)
As discussed in Ref. [41, 11], neutrons have been measured using zero-degree calorimeters (ZDCs) [55] in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. At the RHIC, the ZDCs are positioned ±18 m away from the nominal interaction point at the center of the detector, with dimensions of 10 cm width and 18.75 cm height [55]. For Au + Au collisions at
In summary, using Monte Carlo simulation, we demonstrate that the electromagnetic fields generated in UPCs are strong enough to induce measurable back-to-back emission of neutrons in the transverse plane. The effect discussed here provides a clean way for detecting strong electromagnetic fields, as no hadronic interactions are involved, which would be the strongest electromagnetic fields that can be detected to date. It also offers a method to measure the direction of the impact parameter or electromagnetic field. Thus, it may also shed light on chiral and spin-related effects in relativistic hadronic heavy-ion collisions to understand the fundamental features of hot QCD matter. Additionally, this may aid in understanding the initial conditions of hadronic/heavy-ion collisions with a small b, wherein the electromagnetic fields would be considerably stronger.
Possibility of spontaneous parity violation in hot qcd
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 512–515 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.512Electromagnetic fields and anomalous transports in heavy-ion collisions — A pedagogical review
. Rept. Prog. Phys. 79, 076302 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076302Search for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy ion collisions
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 29, 179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0520-zExperimental searches for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions
. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 200–236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.05.001Thermodynamics of the system of massive dirac fermions in a uniform magnetic field
. Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 091201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/38/9/091201Spin polarization formula for dirac fermions at local equilibrium
. Science China-Physics Mechanics and Astronomy 65, 272011 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-022-1903-8Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid
. Nature 548, 62–65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23004Methods for a blind analysis of isobar data collected by the STAR collaboration
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00878-yAnomalous chiral transports and spin polarization in heavy-ion collisions
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00764-zRecent developments in chiral and spin polarization effects in heavy-ion collisions
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00801-xPhysics of ultra-peripheral nuclear collisions
. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 271–310 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151526STARlight: A Monte Carlo simulation program for ultra-peripheral collisions of relativistic ions
. Comput. Phys. Commun. 212, 258–268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.016Photonuclear and Two-photon Interactions at High-Energy Nuclear Colliders
. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 323–354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-030320-033923Photon-photon physics in very peripheral collisions of relativistic heavy ions
. J. Phys. G 24, 1657–1692 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/24/9/003Exclusive vector meson production in relativistic heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 60, 014903 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.014903Coherent rho0 production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 272302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.272302Photoproduction of J/psi and of high mass e+e- in ultra-peripheral Au+Au collisions at s**(1/2) = 200-GeV
. Phys. Lett. B 679, 321–329 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.061Coherent J/ψ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV
. Phys. Lett. B 718, 1273–1283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.059Coherent J/ψ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions at sNN= 2.76 TeV with the CMS experiment
. Phys. Lett. B 772, 489–511 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.001Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC
. Nature Phys. 13, 852–858 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4208Measurement of e+e- momentum and angular distributions from linearly polarized photon collisions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 052302 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.052302On nuclear dipole vibrations
. Phys. Rev. 74, 1046–1049 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.74.1046Measurements of the giant dipole resonance with monoenergetic photons
. Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 713–761 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.47.713Multiple phonon excitation in nuclei
. Phys. Rept. 252, 275–405 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)00079-IPhotoneutron cross sections of 208 Pb and 197 Au
. Nucl. Phys. A 159, 561–576 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(70)90727-XPygmy and giant dipole resonances by coulomb excitation using a quantum molecular dynamics model
. Phys. Rev. C 87, 014621 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014621Giant dipole resonance as a fingerprint of α clustering configurations in C 12 and O 16
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032506 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.032506Dipole excitation of 6li and 9be studied with an extended quantum molecular dynamics model
. Phys. Rev. C 103, 054318 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054318Coherent vector meson photoproduction with nuclear breakup in relativistic heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 012301 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.012301Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044907Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Lett. B 710, 171–174 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.02.065Coherent diffractive photoproduction of ρ0 mesons on gold nuclei at 200 GeV/nucleon-pair at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
. Phys. Rev. C 96, 054904 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054904Antinuclei in Heavy-Ion Collisions
. Phys. Rept. 760, 1–39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.07.002Novel quantum phenomena induced by strong magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0178-3Diffuse Surface Optical Model for Nucleon-Nuclei Scattering
. Phys. Rev. 95, 577–578 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.577Two-photon interactions with nuclear breakup in relativistic heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 80, 044902 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.044902A generator of forward neutrons for ultra-peripheral collisions: noon Comput
. Phys. Commun. 253, 107181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107181Measurement of mutual coulomb dissociation in sNN = 130GeV au+au collisions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 012302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.012302ρ0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral relativistic heavy ion collisions at sNN = 200 GeV
. Phys. Rev. C 77, 034910 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.034910Coulomb dissociation of a halo nucleus Be-11 at 72A MeV
. Phys. Lett. B 331, 296–301 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)91055-3Multiphoton exchange processes in ultraperipheral relativistic heavy ion collisions
. Nucl. Phys. A 729, 787–808 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.09.006STAR ZDCsmd note
, https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/files/ZDC-SMD.pdfAngular distributions of fast photoneutrons
. Nuclear Physics 23, 144–152 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(61)90247-4Contribution of compound, preequilibrium and direct reactions to photoneutron emission spectrum from various targets induced by 16.6-MeV monoenergetic photons
. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 521, 38–46 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2022.03.007Direct Photodisintegration Processes in Nuclei
. Phys. Rev. 82, 703–709 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.82.703ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: Cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data
. Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887–2996 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002Methods for analyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions
. Phys.Rev. 58, 1671–1678 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1671Momentum anisotropy of leptons from two photon processes in heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 232301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.232301The cos 2φ azimuthal asymmetry in ρ0 meson production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions
. JHEP 10, 064 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)064Azimuthal decorrelation for photon induced dijet production in ultra-peripheral collisions of heavy ions
. JHEP 23, 002 (2020). arXiv:2211.07071, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)002Reaction plane alignment with linearly polarized photon in heavy-ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042048 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L042048Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102301 (2005). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.102301Vector meson spin alignment by the strong force field
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01166-7Global spin alignment of vector mesons and strong force fields in heavy-ion collisions
. Sci. Bull. 68, 874–877 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.04.001The RHIC zero degree calorimeter
. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 470, 488–499 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00627-1Heavy ion partial beam lifetimes due to Coulomb induced processes
. Phys. Rev. E 54, 4233–4239 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.54.4233Exciting ions: A systematic treatment of ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions with nuclear breakup
. Phys. Rev. D 107, 093004 (2023). arXiv:2303.04826, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.093004Photon and gluon induced processes in relativistic heavy ion collisions
. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39, 503–564 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6410(97)00049-5Yu-Gang Ma is the editor-in-chief and Jin-Hui Chen is an editorial board member for Nuclear Science and Techniques, they were not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.