1.Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
Corresponding author: tuofei@nirp.chinacdc.cn
Scan for full text
Bao-Lu Yang, Qiang Zhou, Jing Zhang, et al. Performances of different efficiency calibration methods of high-purity-germanium gamma-ray spectrometry in an inter-comparison exercise. [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques 30(3):37(2019)
Bao-Lu Yang, Qiang Zhou, Jing Zhang, et al. Performances of different efficiency calibration methods of high-purity-germanium gamma-ray spectrometry in an inter-comparison exercise. [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques 30(3):37(2019) DOI: 10.1007/s41365-019-0562-x.
This study reports the performances of efficiency calibrations for high-purity-germanium gamma-ray spectrometry using the source-, Laboratory-Sourceless-Object-Calibration -Software-(LabSOCS)- and ANGLE-based methods in an inter-comparison exercise. Although the results of LabSOCS and ANGLE for ,241,Am emitting low-energy gamma rays were not very satisfactory, all of the three efficiency calibration methods passed acceptance criteria. The results confirmed the reliability of the calculation codes ANGLE and LabSOCS as alternative efficiency calibration methods in high-purity-germanium gamma spectrometry. This study is likely to promote the further application of the ANGLE and LabSOCS calculation codes in radioactivity measurements.
Efficiency calibrationANGLELaboratory Sourceless Object Calibration Software (LabSOCS)Gamma-ray spectrometry.
J. Saegusa, K. Kawasaki, A. Mihara, et al., Determination of detection efficiency curves of HPGe detectors on radioactivity measurement of volume samples. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 61, 1383-1390 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.04.004http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.04.004
M. Mostajaboddavati, S. Hassanzadeh, H. Faghihian, et al., Efficiency calibration and measurement of self-absorption correction for environmental gamma-spectroscopy of soil samples using marinelli beaker. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 268, 539-544 (2006). doi: 10.1007/s10967-006-0202-xhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-006-0202-x
C. A. Mcmahon, M. F. Fegan, J. Wong, et al., Determination of self-absorption corrections for gamma analysis of environmental samples: comparing gamma-absorption curves and spiked matrix-matched samples. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 60, 571-577(2004). doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2003.11.081http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2003.11.081
F. L. Bronson, Validation of the accuracy of the LabSOCS software for mathematical efficiency calibration of Ge detectors for typical laboratory samples. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 255, 137-141(2003). doi: 10.1023/A:1022248318741http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022248318741
S. J. Bell, S. M. Judge, P. H. Regan, An investigation of HPGe gamma efficiency calibration software (ANGLE V. 3) for applications in nuclear decommissioning. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 70, 2737-2741 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.08.007http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.08.007
M. A. Kellett, Assessment of actinide decay data evaluations: Findings of an IAEA coordinated research project. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 70, 1919-1923 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.02.036http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.02.036
IAEA, Quantifying uncertainty in nuclear analytical measurements IAEA TECDOCs-1401. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria (2004).
IAEA, Report on the IAEA-CU-2006-04 ALMERA proficiency test on the determination of gamma emitting radionuclides IAEA/AL/170. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria (2007).
F. Tuo, Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, et al., Inter-comparison exercise for determination of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in soil and building material. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 68, 2335-2338 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.04.023http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.04.023
I. Radulescu, M.R. Calin, Reliability and performances of a high-purity gamma spectrometry system used for environmental measurements. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 301, 141-146 (2014). doi: 10.1007/s10967-014-3150-xhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3150-x
K. Abbas, F. Simonelli, F. D'Alberti, et al., Reliability of two calculation codes for efficiency calibrations of HPGe detectors. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 56, 703-709 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(01)00269-Xhttp://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(01)00269-X
C. Rolle, Z. Lin, S. Healey, Computational approaches on photon-attenuation and coincidence-summing corrections for the detection of gamma-emitting radionuclides IN foods. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 126, 134-137 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.02.034http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.02.034
M. S. Badawi, S. I. Jovanovic, A. A. Thabet, et al., Calibration of 4π NaI(Tl) detectors with coincidence summing correction using new numerical procedure and ANGLE 4 software. Aip Advances, 7, 035005 (2017). doi: 10.1063/1.4978214http://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978214
A. A. Thabet, A.D. Dlabac, S.I. Jovanovic, et al., Experimental verification of gamma-efficiency calculations for scintillation detectors in Angle 4 software. Nucl. Technol. Radiat., 30, 35-46 (2015).
0
Views
0
Downloads
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution