Implantation-decay method to study the β-delayed charged particle decay

Implantation-decay method to study the β -delayed charged particle decay 1 2 first-author 1 corresp Corresponding author, dqfang@sinap.ac.cn Corresponding author, dqfang@sinap.ac.cn dqfang@sinap.ac.cn 3 3 1 2 4 3 5 1 1 5 1 5 5 3 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 1 5 3 1 4 1 4 Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China Department of Nuclear Physics, China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China Department of Nuclear Physics, China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201203, China School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201203, China Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China In this paper, the implantation-decay method is introduced to study the β -delayed charged particle decay. A silicon detector array was used for the implantation of the incident beams and for the detection of the emitted particles. An experimental measurement on the β -delayed particle emission from 22 Al was used to demonstrate the method. The half-life value, charged particle spectroscopy, γ ray spectrum, and γ particle coincidence for the decay process were obtained and compared with previous experimental results for 22 Al. The results show that the implantation-decay method, using a silicon detector array, is a suitable experimental method to study the β -delayed charged particle decay for proton-rich nuclei. Implantation-decay method β -delayed proton emission Proton rich nuclei 22 Al 1 Introduction 1 In the past few decades, the study of nuclei far from the stability line has become a rapidly growing research area owing to continuously developing radioactive beam techniques. New decay modes were discovered in rare isotopes with extreme proton-to-neutron ratio such as β -delayed (multi-)particle emission and direct (multi-)particle emission processes [ 1 1 - 3 3 1-3 ]. Investigations on these decay modes can provide rich spectroscopic information, such as level energies, spins, parities, and level densities and information on their emission mechanism as well [ 4 4 - 6 6 4-6 ]. The comparison between experimental data and theoretical prediction for exotic nuclei can improve our understanding of the structure and behavior of nucleons inside the nucleus. It can also help us to learn various features of nuclei, such as neutron halos, or clustering phenomena [ 7 7 ]. Nuclei very far from the stability line are also particularly important in the nuclear-synthesis of elements; therefore, exploring exotic nuclei and their decay properties is significant for the thorough understanding of certain fundamental questions in astrophysics, such as the creation of isotopes, stellar evolution, star explosion, and other aspects of the universe [ 8 8 - 10 10 8-10 ]. Generally, there are two detection methods to study the β -delayed charged particle decay of proton-rich nuclei: the implantation-decay method, mainly using a silicon detector array, and the time-projection chamber (TPC) detection method. The basic principle of the implantation-decay method can be described as follows. The secondary unstable nuclei beams are implanted and stopped into a silicon detector, and the β -delayed charged particle can be detected by an implantation detector at the exact implantation position following the implantation. The energies of the β -delayed charged particles can be detected accurately, as the decay is detected inside the implantation detector and no dead-layers of the silicon detectors are passed through when the β -delayed charged particles are stopped in the silicon detector. Depending on the purity of the secondary radioactive beams, two implantation (continuous or beam on/off) modes can be chosen in different experiments. If the beam purity is not appropriate, the continuous implantation mode is more suitable. An analysis process, which can remove the contaminant backgrounds efficiently is described in this article later. The beam on/off implantation is adopted when the secondary beams are well purified and the contaminants can be suppressed properly in this mode; however, the utilization of the beam can be lower in beam on/off mode. Compared to the implantation-decay method, detection with the TPC is a newer technique to investigate the rare decay modes of proton-rich isotopes with extremely high isospin, such as the study of two-proton emission from 45 Fe [ 11 11 ] and 54 Zn [ 12 12 ] at the Large Heavy Ion National Accelerator (GANIL) in France. Measurements by TPC can provide a more direct and clear insight of the decay processes, especially when multi-particle emissions from proton-rich isotopes are studied. Angular and momentum correlations between the particles in in the multi-particle emission from the decay process can be established easier by using a TPC measurement. 22 Al was the first exotic odd-odd T z =-2 β -delayed proton emission precursor, which was first observed by Cable et al. in 1982 [ 13 13 ]. In this experiment, only two high-energy peaks (8.212 (16) MeV, 8.537 (22) MeV) in their decay-energy spectrum were clearly confirmed. An approximate half-life value ( <math id="M1"><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mn>70</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>35</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>50</mn></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math> ms) of 22 Al was determined. One year later, Cable et al. observed a β -delayed two-proton (2p) emission mode from 22 Al, which was the first discovery of this kind of decay mode from highly proton-rich nuclei [ 14 14 ]. In 1997, Blank et al. performed an experiment by implanting 22 Al into silicon detectors and into a micro-strip gas counter(MSGC) [ 15 15 ]. Using drift-time analysis in the MSGC, β -delayed α emission from 22 Al was observed for the first time, while a half-life value (T 1/2 =59±3 ms) was also obtained in the experiment. In 2006, an experiment was performed using better purified 22 Al and γ detection by Achouri et al. [ 16 16 ], In this experiment an implantation-decay method and beam on/off mode were used, and more proton peaks, γ -particle coincidences and T 1/2 =91.1±0.5 ms was obtained. Although several experiments had been performed focusing on 22 Al, more experimental data is required to understand the large dispersion of the previous half-life values and other details of the decay process. A newly designed silicon box detection system was used to measure β -delayed particle emission from 22 Al. 22 Al is also a β -delayed two-proton decay precursor and the surrounding silicon detectors in the silicon box detector are designed to detect the relative angular and momentum correlations between the two β -delayed protons from 22 Al, when the two protons escape the centered implantation detector and detected by the surrounding detectors. In our experiment, the half-life value of 90.8±1.3 ms was given, which is consistent with the previous result by Achouri et al. [ 16 16 ]. The energy spectrum of β -delayed protons from 22 Al obtained in our experiment shares the main features of all previous experiments for 22 Al. In addition, in our experiment γ rays were also detected by five Clover-type detectors and the proton γ -ray coincidence was also obtained. The results of our experiment indicate that the newly designed silicon detector array achieves a good performance in continuous-implantation mode, when the secondary beam is severely contaminated by other unstable β -delayed charged particle decay precursors. The experimental setup, data analysis, and discussion is discussed later in this article. 2 Description of the experiment 1 The experiment was performed at the National Laboratory of Heavy Ion Research (HIRFL) of the Institute of Modern Physics, Lanzhou, China. 22 Al was produced by the projectile fragmentation of a primary beam of 28 Si at 76 MeV/nucleon, with an average intensity of 50 enA impinged on a 384.8 mg/cm 2 Be target. The setting of the dipole magnet was optimized for 22 Al. A series of aluminum foils were installed upstream as an energy degrader to ensure that most of the 22 Al ions were implanted and stopped into a double-sided silicon detector (DSSD0). A total number of 1.3×10 5 22 Al was recorded in the experiment. The average implantation rate of 22 Al was 18/min, and the average purity of 22 Al was 0.26%. The main contamination in the secondary beam were 21 Mg( ∼ 7%), 20 Na( ∼ 34%), 19 Ne( ∼ 56%), and other stable isotopes. Particle identification were performed by using energy-loss and time-of-flight (TOF) correlations. A schematic drawing of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1 Fig. 1 . A 4 π silicon box detector was designed for implantation and decay detection. In front of the box, three silicon detectors ( Δ E1- Δ E3) and two scintillation detectors (T1 and T2) were installed for particle identification. The silicon box detector was composed of one 69 μM thick double-sided silicon detector (DSSD0) in the center of the box, surrounded by further silicon detectors. The structure of the silicon box was designed to detect both the β -delayed one-proton and β -delayed two-proton emission processes from the 22 Al. A 42.5 (1)° angle between the centered and the bottomed DSSD planes was set to achieve a better acceptance of the emitted charged particles. Four double-sided silicon detectors (DSSD1–DSSD4) followed by four quadrant silicon detectors (QSD1–QSD4), and two silicon circular dichroism (CD) detectors (DSSD5 and DSSD6) were used to cover the 4 π solid angle to achieve the highest detection efficiency. The thicknesses of DSSD1–DSSD6 were 64 μM, 61 μM, 304 μM, 525 μM, 317 μM, and 315 μM, respectively. The thicknesses of QSD1-QSD4 were 1533 μM, 1546 μM, 314 μM, and 309 μM, respectively. The energy-resolution of each DSSD was 50 KeV. Five high-purity (HP) germanium clover detectors were installed outside the silicon box to detect γ -rays emitted from the decay of the implanted nuclei during the experiment. The total efficiency for γ -rays at 1.528 MeV was estimated to be 1.1(0.2)%. All silicon detectors were installed on printed circuit boards. The pre-amplifiers for the silicon detectors are SPA02-type, designed by the China Institute of Atomic Energy. A circulating alcohol cooling system was used to cool the silicon detectors and the pre-amplifiers during the experiment, to maintain their temperature at ∼ 0 °C and ∼ 30 °C, respectively. Two different electronic signal gain factors were set for the DSSD0 to detect high-energy (greater than 100 MeV) implantation ions and low-energy (several MeV) β -delayed particles. Both the implantation signals and the decay signals were used to trigger the Versa Module Europa (VME) data acquisition (DAQ) system. A Monte Carlo simulation of proton detection efficiency was performed with the Geant4 software toolkit for our experimental setup. In the simulation, a Gaussian distribution was assumed for the implantation depth alongside the beam direction in the DSSD0. The simulation results are shown in Fig. 2 Fig. 2 , where the full square line represents the proton detection efficiency for the DSSD0 and the full triangle line represents the proton detection efficiency for the silicon box. As can be seen in Fig. 2 Fig. 2 , most protons, which escaped the implantation silicon detector can be detected by the surrounding silicon detectors. 20 Na is one of the main contaminations in the experiment, and it is also a β -delayed α emission nuclei widely studied by several different experiments [ 18 18 - 21 21 18-21 ]. Several strong β -delayed α branches are available and their energies are exactly known from various studies, which can provide a perfect standard source to calibrate the in-beam of the DSSD0. The surrounding silicon detectors (DSSD1–DSSD6, QSD1–QSD4) were calibrated by a standard composite α source (Pu-239, Am-241, and Cm-244). The calibration of the ToF- Δ E spectrum was done by an LISE++ simulation [ 22 22 ]. The energy of the clover detectors were calibrated by a 152 Eu standard source. 3 Results and discussion 1 In the experiment, there were strong contaminations in the secondary radioactive beams where 21 Mg and 20 Na are also β -delayed proton and β -delayed α precursors; therefore, a special correlation method was used in the data processing to subtract the backgrounds. The correlation method was implemented as follows. The ions of interest were implanted and stopped into one pixel of the centered silicon detector (DSSD0). The implanted ion was identified and flagged by the ToF- Δ E correlation method. Following the implantation event, in a time interval of 4000 ms, all the decay events in the same pixel of the implantation event were correlated with the implantation event. The time interval was set to 4000 ms, which is sufficiently long compared with the half-life value of the 22 Al. In the analysis procedure, the correlation between an implantation event and its corresponding decay event can not be established directly in an experiment with continuous-implantation. The decay event in the same pixel could belong to any other implantation events, which implanted before the decay event, if the time interval between the decay event and the implantation event is suitable for the half-life of the implantation ion. When a decay event was correlated with all possible implantation events, several uncorrelated events exist, which contribute the constant background in the decay time spectrum. In the decay time spectrum, all correlated events contribute to an exponential decay trend, and the uncorrelated events contribute to a constant background. The events in the range of 2000–4000 ms in the decay time spectrum in Fig. 3 Fig. 3 were considered to be the constant background. By subtracting the decay energy spectrum of the selected background from the decay energy spectrum of the correlated and uncorrelated events, the contaminations can be efficiently removed in the energy spectrum of the β -delayed charged particles for 22 Al. A similar data analysis procedure was used in the experiment by Dossat et al. in 2007 [ 23 23 ]. The decay time distribution in Fig. 3 Fig. 3 includes the correlated (exponential curve) and uncorrelated (constant background) events. The function <math display="block" id="M2"><mrow><mi>N</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>N</mi><mn>0</mn></msub><msup><mi>e</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>λ</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msup><mo>+</mo><mi>b</mi></mrow></math> describing the standard radioactive decay law and a constant background was used to fit the decay time spectrum. A half-life value of 90.8±1.3 ms was obtained from the fit for 22 Al. The lower figure in Fig. 3 Fig. 3 shows the residuals between the data and the fit function. All previous experimental data of half-life values for 22 Al, together with our result are listed in Table 1 Table 1 , where there a large dispersion in the three previous half-life values for 22 Al can be seen. The half-life value obtained by us is consistent with the previous value by Achouri et al. ; however, the error bars are larger. The experimental half-life value for 22 Al by Achouri et al. (2006) is confirmed by this experiment. 1 1 Literature 1 1 Year 1 1 T 1/2 (ms) 1 1 Cable et al. [ 14 14 ] 1 1 1982 1 1 <math id="M3"><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mn>70</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>35</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>50</mn></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math> 1 1 Blank et al. [ 15 15 ] 1 1 1997 1 1 59±3 1 1 Achouri et al. [ 16 16 ] 1 1 2006 1 1 91.1±0.5 1 1 Present work 1 1 2017 1 1 90.8±1.3 As mentioned above, the decay time spectrum in Fig. 3 Fig. 3 includes both correlated and uncorrelated events. Following the background subtraction from the energy spectrum of β -delayed charged particles from correlated and uncorrelated events, the energy spectrum of β -delayed charged particles from 22 Al was obtained as shown in Fig. 4 Fig. 4 , where up to 15 peaks can be seen. It exhibits the same main features as those observed in a previous measurement [ 16 16 ]. We denote the various peaks with peaks numbers i (where i=1,2,...,15). A Gaussian distribution was used to extract the peak energy for each peak. The branching ratios were obtained by dividing the areas of each peaks by the numbers of 22 Al implanted, with considering the detection efficiency. Peak 12 at 5.541±0.025 MeV is due to the β -delayed α particle emission from the contaminant 20 Na, and it is verified by the fitness of the decay time. As peak 12 is considered as one of the peaks from the decay of 20 Na, peak 6 is expected to be contaminated by 20 Na due to a significant peak energy at 2.685 MeV in the energy spectrum of the charged particles from the decay of 20 Na, which is very close to peak 6. This contamination can be subtracted by the ratio of the relative intensities from 20 Na. The branching ratios of other peaks in the energy spectrum of the charged particles from the decay of 20 Na are very small compared with the peak energies at 2.685 MeV and 5.547 MeV [ 18 18 ]; thus, the other peaks in the contamination of 20 Na are only considered in the error bars in our results. All peaks and branching ratios were listed and compared with previous measurements in Table 2 Table 2 , where the energies are the total decay energies in the center-of-mass frame. 1 1 2*Peak 2 1 This work 2 1 Achouri et al. [ 16 16 ] 2 1 Blank et al. [ 15 15 ] 1 1   1 1 Energy (MeV) 1 1 Br(%) 1 1 Energy (MeV) 1 1 Br (%) 1 1 Energy (MeV) 1 1 Br(%) 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 0.475±0.008 1 1 4.73±0.63 1 1 0.45±0.04 1 1 6.4±1.2 1 1 1 1 1 0.729±0.02 1 1 6.50±0.35 1 1 0.721±0.008 1 1 7.39±1.01 1 1 0.72±0.04 1 1 6.8±1.2 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 0.975±0.008 1 1 0.25±0.05 1 1   1 1   1 1 2 1 1 1.037±0.02 1 1 3.70±0.28 1 1 1.033±0.008 1 1 3.00±0.34 1 1 1.04±0.04 1 1 3.9±1.2 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 1.223±0.008 1 1 0.75±0.10 1 1   1 1   1 1 3 1 1 1.298±0.02 1 1 18.3±3.82 1 1 1.299±0.008 1 1 18.51±1.7 1 1 1.32±0.04 1 1 18.0±1.0 1 1 4 1 1 1.570±0.02 1 1 1.77±1.04 1 1 1.551±0.008 1 1 0.81±0.16 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 1.753±0.008 1 1 0.45±0.08 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 1.95±0.06 1 1 3.2±1.0 1 1 5 1 1 2.040±0.02 1 1 1.75±0.20 1 1 2.072±0.008 1 1 0.48±0.07 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 2.503±0.008 1 1 0.64±0.13 1 1   1 1   1 1 6 1 1 2.590±0.02 1 1 5.30±0.30 1 1 2.583±0.008 1 1 4.89±0.24 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 2.838±0.008 1 1 2.11±0.09 1 1   1 1   1 1 7 1 1 3.088±0.02 1 1 2.05±0.25 1 1 3.088±0.008 1 1 1.89±0.07 1 1   1 1   1 1 8 1 1 3.476±0.02 1 1 1.95±0.20 1 1 3.484±0.008 1 1 2.18±0.15 1 1   1 1   1 1 9 1 1 4.009±0.03 1 1 1.23±0.16 1 1 4.017±0.008 1 1 1.04±0.33 1 1 3.997±0.049 1 1 0.32±0.09 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 4.10±0.006 1 1 2.1±1.0 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 4.224±0.008 1 1 0.84±0.11 1 1   1 1   1 1 10 1 1 4.461±0.03 1 1 2.14±0.15 1 1 4.464±0.008 1 1 2.52±0.14 1 1   1 1   1 1 10* 1 1 4.461±0.03 1 1 0.35±0.10 1 1 4.464±0.008 1 1 0.69±0.08 1 1 4.48±0.025 1 1 0.9±0.5 1 1 11 1 1 4.804±0.03 1 1 1.20±0.10 1 1 4.912±0.008 1 1 0.28±0.32 1 1 4.92±0.07 1 1 2.4±1.0 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 5.177±0.008 1 1 0.29±0.11 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 5.667±0.008 1 1 0.35±0.11 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 5.808±0.008 1 1 0.18±0.55 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 5.909±0.008 1 1 0.21±0.62 1 1   1 1   1 1 13 1 1 6.089±0.04 1 1 0.56±0.04 1 1 6.085±0.008 1 1 0.41±0.07 1 1   1 1   1 1 14 1 1 6.715±0.04 1 1 0.25±0.05 1 1 6.774±0.008 1 1 0.41±0.12 1 1 6.62±0.10 1 1 0.7±0.3 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 6.93±0.10 1 1 0.1±0.05 1 1 15 1 1 7.460±0.06 1 1 0.30±0.02 1 1 7.517±0.011 1 1 0.33±0.07 1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1   1 1 8.29±0.10 1 1 0.2±0.05 Figure 5 Figure 5 shows four γ rays detected by the five germanium clover detectors triggered by β -delayed particles from 22 Al. γ ray 1 at 0.332 MeV originates from the γ transitions from the first excited state to the ground state in 21 Na, and γ ray 3 at 1.384 MeV originates from the γ transitions from the second excited state to the first excited state in 21 Na. γ ray 2 at 0.511 MeV originates from positron–electron annihilation, while γ ray 4 at 1.633 MeV originates from the γ transitions from the first excited state to the ground state in 20 Ne. Figure 6 Figure 6 shows the charged particle spectrum of 22 Al in coincidence with the γ -ray energy at 0.332 MeV and it also shows the decay branches from excited states from 22 Mg to the first excited state in 21 Na. Considering the difficulties of removing the background of the gamma and charged particle spectrum completely, the charged particle spectrum of 22 Al in coincidence with the γ -ray energy at 0.332 MeV also contain charged particles, which do not correlate with the 0.332-MeV γ -rays. We can distinguish between correlated charged particle peaks and uncorrelated charged particle peaks in Fig. 6 Fig. 6 by comparing the relative branching ratios of each proton peaks before and after the γ coincidence in Figs. 4 Figs. 4 and 6 6 . In Fig. 6 Fig. 6 , charged particle peak 1 is significantly more suppressed than charged particle peaks 2, 3, and 6, after the gate of 0.332 MeV γ -rays on the energy spectrum of β -delayed charged particles from 22 Al. Thus, the 0.332-MeV γ rays are correlated with proton peaks 2, 3, and 6. This result is consistent with the information of coincidences in a previous experiment performed by Achouri et al. [ 16 16 ]. In this experiment, the coincidence of the charged particle peak 10 * at 4.461 MeV with the 1.633-MeV γ -rays from 20 Ne was observed, which indicates a β -delayed two-proton decay branch of 22 Al to the first excited state in 20 Ne, as observed in a previous experiment [ 16 16 ]. The energy of the charged particle peak 9 (E = 4.009±0.025 MeV) is in agreement with the β – α transition measured by two previous experiments [ 15 15 , 16 16 ]. However, in the present experiment, no clear γ rays at 1.887 MeV were observed due to the low statistics. Thus, no β -. α transition was observed in this experiment. In future experiments, more statistics are required to observe these decay branches. 4 Conclusion 1 β -delayed charged particle emission from the proton-rich nucleus of 22 Al has been investigated experimentally on RIBLL1. 22 Al was produced by projectile fragmentation of a 28 Si primary beam on a Be target. In the experiment, a continuous-implantation method was used. The energy spectra of the β -delayed charged particles from 22 Al, the γ -rays correlated with β -delayed charged particles from 22 Al, and the β -delayed charged particles from 22 Al correlated with γ -rays at 0.332 MeV are presented in this work. The half-life value for 22 Al was measured as 90.8±1.3 ms, which is in good agreement with the previous experimental result of 91.1±0.5 ms by Achouri et al. [ 16 16 ]. The results of our study on the decay of 22 Al in the presented experiment show that the silicon detector array performs effectively in the measurement of β -delayed charged particle emission in the continuous implantation-decay method. References M. J. G. Borge , Beta-delayed particle emission . Physica Scripta 2013 , 014013 ( 2013 ). doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/t152/014013 http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2013/t152/014013 Beta-delayed particle emission M. Pfützner , Particle radioactivity of exotic nuclei . Physica Scripta 2013 , 0140142013 ( 2013 ). doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T152/014014 http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T152/014014 Particle radioactivity of exotic nuclei M. Pfützner , M. Karny , L. V. Grigorenko , et al ., Radioactive decays at limits of nuclear stability . Rev. Mod. Phys . 84 , 567 ( 2012 ). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.567 http://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.567 Radioactive decays at limits of nuclear stability N. Yu , M. Enrico , F. Lidia , Two-proton sequential decay from excited states of 18Ne . Nuclear Science and Techniques 24 , 050517 ( 2013 ). doi: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.2013.05.017 http://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.2013.05.017 Two-proton sequential decay from excited states of 18Ne Y. G. Ma , D.Q. Fang , X.Y. Sun , et al ., Different mechanism of two-proton emission from proton-rich nuclei 23Al and 22Mg . Phys. lett. B 743 , 306 - 309 ( 2015 ). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.066 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.066 Different mechanism of two-proton emission from proton-rich nuclei 23Al and 22Mg D.Q. Fang , Y.G. Ma , X.Y. Sun , et al ., Proton-proton correlations in distinguishing the two-proton emission mechanism of 23Al and 22Mg . Phys. Rev. C 94 , 044621 ( 2016 ). doi: 10.1103/PhysReVC.94.044621 http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysReVC.94.044621 Proton-proton correlations in distinguishing the two-proton emission mechanism of 23Al and 22Mg N. Michel , W. Nazarewicz , J. Okolowicz , et al ., Open problems in the theory of nuclear open quantum systems . Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 37 , 064042 ( 2010 ). doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/37/6/064042 http://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/37/6/064042 Open problems in the theory of nuclear open quantum systems E. M. Burbidge , G. R. Burbidge , W. A. Fowler , et al ., Synthesis of the Elements in Stars . Rev. Mod. Phys . 29 , 547 ( 1957 ). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547 http://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547 Synthesis of the Elements in Stars K. Langanke , G. M. Pinedo , Nuclear weak-interaction processes in stars . Rev. Mod. Phys . 75 , 819 ( 2003 ). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.819 http://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.819 Nuclear weak-interaction processes in stars H. Grawe , K. Langanke , G. M. Pinedo , Nuclear structure and astrophysics . Reports on Progress in Physics 70 , 1525 ( 2007 ). doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/70/9/R02 http://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/70/9/R02 Nuclear structure and astrophysics K. Miernik , W. Dominik , Z. Janas , et al . Two-proton correlations in the decay of 45Fe . Phys. Rev. Lett . 99 , 192501 ( 2007 ). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.192501 http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.192501 Two-proton correlations in the decay of 45Fe P. Ascher , L. Audirac , N. Adimi , et al . Direct observation of two protons in the decay of 54Zn . Phys. Rev. Lett . 107 , 102502 ( 2011 ). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.102502 http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.102502 Direct observation of two protons in the decay of 54Zn M. D. Cable , J. Honkanen , R. F. Pary , et al ., Beta-delayed proton decay of an odd-odd Tz=-2 isotope, 22Al . Phys. Rev. C 26 , 1778 ( 1982 ). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.26.1778 http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.26.1778 Beta-delayed proton decay of an odd-odd Tz=-2 isotope, 22Al M. D. Cable , J. Honkanen , R. F. Parry , et al ., Discovery of Beta-Delayed Two-Proton Radioactivity: 22Al . Phys. Rev. Lett . 50 , 404 ( 1983 ). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.404 http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.404 Discovery of Beta-Delayed Two-Proton Radioactivity: 22Al B. Blank , F. Boué , S. Andriamonje , et al ., The spectroscopy of 22Al: A β p, β2p and βα emitter . Nuc. Phys. A 615 , 52 ( 1997 ). doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(96)00483-6 http://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(96)00483-6 The spectroscopy of 22Al: A β p, β2p and βα emitter N. L. Achouri , F. de Oliveira Santos , M. Lewitowicz , et al ., The β-decay of 22Al . Eur. Phys. J. A 27 , 287 ( 2006 ). doi: 10.1140/epja/i2005-10274-0 http://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2005-10274-0 The β-decay of 22Al Z. Sun , W. L. Zhan , Z. Y. Guo , et al ., The radioactive ion beam line in Lanzhou . Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 503 , 496 ( 2003 ). doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01005-2 http://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01005-2 The radioactive ion beam line in Lanzhou D. F. Torgerson , K. Wien , Y. Fares , et al ., β+ decay of 20Na . Phys. Rev. C 8 , 161 ( 1973 ). doi: 10.1103/Physrevc.8.161 http://doi.org/10.1103/Physrevc.8.161 β+ decay of 20Na W. X. Huang , X. J. Xu , R. C. Ma , et al ., Decay study of 20Na and its beta-delayed 16O recoiling . Sci. China Ser. A 40 , 638 ( 1997 ). doi: 10.1007/Bf02876068 http://doi.org/10.1007/Bf02876068 Decay study of 20Na and its beta-delayed 16O recoiling J. Büscher , J. Ponsaers , R. Raabe , et al ., β-Decay studies with an implantation technique . Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 266 , 4652 ( 2008 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.084 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.084 β-Decay studies with an implantation technique K. L. Laursen , O. S. Kirsebom , H. O. U. Fynbo , et al ., High-statistics measurement of the β-delayed α spectrum of 20Na . Eur. Phys. J. A 49 , 6 ( 2013 ). doi: 10.1140/Epja/I2013-13079-6 http://doi.org/10.1140/Epja/I2013-13079-6 High-statistics measurement of the β-delayed α spectrum of 20Na O. B. Tarasov , D. Bazin , LISE++: Radioactive beam production with in-flight separators . Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 266 , 4957 ( 2008 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.110 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.110 LISE++: Radioactive beam production with in-flight separators C. Dossta , N. Adimi , F. Aksouh , et al ., The decay of proton-rich nuclei in the mass A=36-56 region . Nucl. Phys. A 792 , 18 - 86 ( 2007 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.05.004 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.05.004 The decay of proton-rich nuclei in the mass A=36-56 region 10.1007/s41365-018-0438-5 This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11421505, 11475244, and 11175231) and the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (the High Precision Nuclear Physics Experiments). 2017-12-13 2018-04-20 2018-04-26 2018-05-29 2018-07-01 2021-04-11 © China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, ChineseNuclear Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018 This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Nuclear Science and Techniques. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0438-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0438-5 . 2018 Nuclear Science and Techniques 07 29