Ma Y., Liu S., Luo Z. et al., RMC/CTF multiphysics solutions to VERA core physics benchmark problem 9. Ann. Nucl. Energy 133, 837-852 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.07.033http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.07.033.

Kotlyar D., Shwageraus E., Numerical stable Monte Carlo-burnup-thermal-hydraulic coupling schemes. Ann. Nucl. Energy 63, 371-381 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.08.016http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.08.016

Guo X.Y., Shang X.T., Song J. et al. Kinetic methods in Monte Carlo code RMC and its implementation to C5G7-TD benchmark. Ann. Nucl. Energy 151, 107864, (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107864http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107864

Zheng Z., Wu H.C., Cao L.Z. et al., A deterministic and Monte Carlo coupling method for PWR cavity radiation streaming calculation. Ann. Nucl. Energy 63, 162-171 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.07.040http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.07.040

Zheng Z., Mei Q.L., Deng L., Study on variance reduction technique based on adjoint Discrete Ordinate method. Ann. Nucl. Energy 112, 374-382 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.028http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.028

Pan Q.Q., Rao J.J., Zhou Y.Y. et al., Improved adaptive variance reduction algorithm based on RMC code for deep penetration problems. Ann. Nucl. Energy 137, 107113 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107113http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107113

Wagner J., Peplow D., Mosher S., FW-CADIS method for global and regional variance reduction of Monte Carlo radiation transport calculations. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 176, 37-57 (2014). doi: 10.13182/NSE12-33http://doi.org/10.13182/NSE12-33

Cooper M., Larsen E., Automated weight windows for global Monte Carlo particle transport calculations. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 137, 1-13 (2001).

Hendricks J., A code-generated Monte Carlo importance function. T. Am. Nucl. Soc. 41, 307 (1982).

Kelly D., Sutton T., Wilson S.. MC21 Analysis of the nuclear energy agency Monte Carlo performance benchmark problem. Proc. Advances in Reactor Physics—Linking Research, Industry, and Education, (PHYSOR 2012), Knoxville, Tennessee, April 15-20, American Nuclear Society, 2012.

Shangguan D.H., Li G., Zhang B.Y. et al., Uniform tally density based strategy for global tallying in Monte Carlo criticality calculation. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 182(4), 555-562 (2016). doi: 10.13182/NSE15-32http://doi.org/10.13182/NSE15-32

Pan Q.Q., Wang K., Uniform variance method for accelerated Monte Carlo criticality calculation. Prog. Nucl. Energy 139, 103858 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103858http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103858

Chao Y., A new and rigorous SPN theory – Part III: A succinct summary of the GSPN theory, the P3 equivalent GSP3 and implementation issues. Ann. Nucl. Energy 119, 310-321 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2018.04.029http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.04.029

Chao Y., Peng L., Tang C., A new and rigorous SPN theory – Part IV: Numerical qualification of GSP3 and the generalized transverse integration nodal method. Ann. Nucl. Energy 149, 107768 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107768http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107768

Wang K., Li Z.G., She D. et al., RMC – A Monte Carlo code for reactor core analysis. Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 121-129 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.048http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.048

Carney S., Brown F., Kiedrowski B. et al., Theory and application of the fission matrix method for continuous-energy Monte Carlo. Ann. Nucl. Energy 73, 423-431 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.020http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.020

Leppanen J., Response matrix method–based importance solver and variance reduction scheme in the serpent 2 Monte Carlo code. Nucl. Technol. 205(11), 1416-1432 (2019). doi: 10.1080/00295450.2019.1603710http://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1603710

Pan Q.Q., Hao L., Li D. et al., A new nonlinear iterative method for SPN theory. Ann. Nucl. Energy 110, 920-927 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.07.030http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.07.030

HidekiI T., Yasushi M., Accuracy of interpolation methods for resonance self-shielding factors. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 18(2), 152-161 (1981). doi: 10.1080/18811248.1981.9733236Ihttp://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1981.9733236I.

Petrovic , Benoist P.. BN Theory: Advances and New Models for Neutron Leakage Calculation. New York: Plenum Press, 223-281, 1996. doi: 10.1093/molehr/1.1.36http://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/1.1.36

Pan Q.Q., Wang K., Acceleration method of fission source convergence based on RMC code. Ann. Nucl. Energy 52(7), 1347-1354 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.net.2019.12.007http://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.12.007

Duderstadt J., Hamilton L.. Nuclear reactor theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976.

Beckert C., Grundmann U., Development and verification of a nodal approach for solving the multigroup SP3 equations. Ann. Nucl. Energy 35, 75-86 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2007.05.014http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2007.05.014

Smith K.S., Multidimensional nodal transport using the simplified PL method. T. Am. Nucl. Soc. 52, 427 (1986).

Pan Q.Q., Lu H.L., Li D.S. et al., The rigorous SP3 theory and study on its numerical verification. Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE 25), 2017. doi: 10.1115/ICONE25-67309http://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE25-67309

Brantley P., Larsen E., The simplified P3 approximation. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 134, 1-21 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00603-5http://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00603-5

Smith K., Nodal method storage reduction by nonlinear iteration. T. Am. Nucl. Soc. 44, 265 (1983).

Smith M., Lewis E., Na B., Benchmark on deterministic transport calculations without spatial homogenization –a 2d/3d MOX fuel assembly benchmark, Tech. Rep. NEA/NSC/DOC 16, OECD/NEA, (2003). doi: 10.1016/j.pnueene.2004.09.003http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnueene.2004.09.003

Boyd W., Reactor multi-group cross section generation for fine mesh deterministic neutron transport simulations. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2017.