1.Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
2.Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010050, China
Corresponding author, zhanglan@sinap.ac.cn
Scan for full text
Da-wei JIANG, Cheng PENG, Yan-Hong SUN, et al. Study on technetium-99m labeling of graphene oxide nanosheets through click chemistry–99mTc labeling of graphene oxide nanosheets. [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques 26(4):040301(2015)
Da-wei JIANG, Cheng PENG, Yan-Hong SUN, et al. Study on technetium-99m labeling of graphene oxide nanosheets through click chemistry–99mTc labeling of graphene oxide nanosheets. [J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques 26(4):040301(2015) DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.26.040301.
Graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets possess several advantages, such as a large surface, outstanding bio-compatibility, and straightforward chemical modification capability. They also have great potential as a drug-carrier. In this article, we radiolabeled GO nanosheets with ,99m,Tc, which satisfies the potential needs of micro-SPECT imaging probes in pre-clinical and clinical research. GO nanosheets were synthesized through the modified Hummers’ method, then GO nanosheets with azide group covalently functionalized in two steps were conjugated to DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-,N,N’,N",N" ’,-tetraacetic acid) and functionalized with an alkynyl group by means of click chemistry. Then through the addition and reduction of technetium-99m, the ,99m,Tc-DOTA-GO were attained. DOTA-conjugated GOs with lateral dimensions of 500–600 nm were synthesized. Both atomic force microscopy (AFM) and FT-IR were performed to characterize the GO-DOTA. Labeling efficiency of GO-DOTA with ,99m,Tc was ,>,90% and radiochemical purities were ,>,96% with purification. We successfully synthesized graphene oxide derivatives, DOTA-conjugated GOs, via Click Chemistry, and it was labeled with ,99m,Tc for SPECT imaging. High radiolabeling efficiency makes GO nanosheets suitable platforms for future molecular imaging research.
Graphene oxide nanosheets99mTc labelingClick chemistry
D Jariwala, V K Sangwan, L J Lauhon, et al. Carbon nanomaterials for electronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics, and sensing. Chem Soc Rev, 2013, 42: 2824-2860. DOI: 10.1039/C2CS35335Khttp://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35335K
S K Vashist and J H Luong. Recent advances in electrochemical biosensing schemes using graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites. Carbon, 2015, 84: 519-550. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.052http://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.052
A Bianco, K Kostarelos and M Prato. Applications of carbon nanotubes in drug delivery. Curr Opin Chem Boil, 2005, 9: 674-679. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.10.005http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.10.005
A K Geim and K S Novoselov. The rise of graphene. Nat Mater, 2007, 6: 183-191. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1849http://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849
D Li, M B Muller, S Gilje, et al. Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol, 2008, 3: 101-105. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2007.451http://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.451
C Lee, X Wei, J W Kysar, et al. Measurement of the Elastic Properties and Intrinsic Strength of Monolayer Graphene. Science, 2008, 321: 385-388. DOI: 10.1126/science.1157996http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157996
M J Allen, V C Tung and R B Kaner. Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem Rev, 2010, 110: 132-145. DOI: 10.1021/cr900070dhttp://doi.org/10.1021/cr900070d
M C Duch, G R Budinger, Y T Liang, et al. Minimizing oxidation and stable nanoscale dispersion improves the biocompatibility of graphene in the lung. Nano Lett, 2011, 11: 5201-5207. DOI: 10.1021/nl202515ahttp://doi.org/10.1021/nl202515a
Y Liu, D Yu, C Zeng, et al. Biocompatible graphene oxide-based glucose biosensors. Langmuir, 2010, 26: 6158-6160. DOI: 10.1021/la100886xhttp://doi.org/10.1021/la100886x
S K Singh, M K Singh, P P Kulkarni, et al. Amine-modified graphene: thrombo-protective safer alternative to graphene oxide for biomedical applications. ACS Nano, 2012, 6: 2731-2740. DOI: 10.1021/nn300172thttp://doi.org/10.1021/nn300172t
Z Liu, J T Robinson, X Sun, et al. PEGylated nanographene oxide for delivery of water-insoluble cancer drugs. J Am Chem Soc, 2008, 130: 10876-10877. DOI: 10.1021/ja803688xhttp://doi.org/10.1021/ja803688x
L Feng, S Zhang and Z Liu. Graphene based gene transfection. Nanoscale, 2011, 3: 1252-1257. DOI: 10.1039/c0nr00680ghttp://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00680g
C Peng, W Hu, Y Zhou, et al. Intracellular imaging with a graphene-based fluorescent probe. Small, 2010, 6: 1686-1692. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201000560http://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201000560
H Hong, K Yang, Y Zhang, et al. In vivo targeting and imaging of tumor vasculature with radiolabeled, antibody-conjugated nanographene. ACS Nano, 2012, 6: 2361-2370. DOI: 10.1021/nn204625ehttp://doi.org/10.1021/nn204625e
X Sun, Z Liu, K Welsher, et al. Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano Res, 2008, 1: 203-212. DOI: 10.1007/s12274-008-8021-8http://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-008-8021-8
X Ma, H Tao, K Yang, et al. A functionalized graphene oxide-iron oxide nanocomposite for magnetically targeted drug delivery, photothermal therapy, and magnetic resonance imaging. Nano Res, 2012, 5: 199-212. DOI: 10.1007/s12274-012-0200-yhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-012-0200-y
H Hong, Y Zhang, J W Engle, et al. In vivo targeting and positron emission tomography imaging of tumor vasculature with (66)Ga-labeled nano-graphene. Biomaterials, 2012, 33: 4147-4156. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.031http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.031
Y Fazaeli, O Akhavan, R Rahighi, et al. In vivo SPECT imaging of tumors by ^198,199Au-labeled graphene oxide nanostructures. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2014, 45:196-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.019http://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.019
K Tae-Eun, N Siwan, J Sol, et al. Calculation of the intake retention fraction and dose coefficients in 99mTc-labelled compound for internal exposure for medical workers. Nucl Sci Tech, 2014, 25: S010302. DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.25.S010302http://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.25.S010302
S Gao, Q Ma, Q Wen, et al. 99mTc-3P4-RGD2 radiotracers for SPECT/CT of esophageal tumor. Nucl Sci Tech, 2013, 24: 040302. DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.24.040302http://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.24.040302
X Zhou, Y Kong, M Zou, et al. Preparation of 99mTc-PQQE and preliminary biological evaluation for the NMDA receptor. Nuc Sci Tech, 2013, 24: 030303. DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.24.030303http://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.24.030303
A Heppeler, S Froidevaux, A N Eberle, et al. Receptor targeting for tumor localisation and therapy with radiopeptides. Curr Med Chem, 2000, 7: 971-994. DOI: 10.2174/0929867003374516http://doi.org/10.2174/0929867003374516
W S Hummers and R E Offeman. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc, 1958, 80: 1339-1339. DOI: 10.1021/ja01539a017http://doi.org/10.1021/ja01539a017
N I Kovtyukhova, P J Ollivier, B R Martin, et al. Layer-by-layer assembly of ultrathin composite films from micron-sized graphite oxide sheets and polycations. Chem Mater, 1999, 11: 771-778. DOI: 10.1021/cm981085uhttp://doi.org/10.1021/cm981085u
S Stankovich, R D Piner, S T Nguyen, et al. Synthesis and exfoliation of isocyanate-treated graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Carbon, 2006, 44: 3342-3347. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.004http://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.004
Z Wang, Z Ge, X Zheng, et al. Polyvalent DNA-graphene nanosheets “click" conjugates. Nanoscale, 2012, 4: 394-399. DOI: 10.1039/c1nr11174dhttp://doi.org/10.1039/c1nr11174d
J K Uppal, R Varshney, P P Hazari, et al. Biological evaluation of avidin-based tumor pretargeting with DOTA-Triazole-Biotin constructed via versatile Cu(I) catalyzed click chemistry. J Drug Target, 2011, 19: 418-426. DOI: 10.3109/1061186X.2010.504269http://doi.org/10.3109/1061186X.2010.504269
0
Views
2
Downloads
1
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution