Measurement of the neutron total cross-section of carbon at Back-n white neutron beam of CSNS

Measurement of the neutron total cross-section of carbon at Back-n white neutron beam of CSNS 1 first-author 1 1 corresp Corresponding author: liurongzy@163.com Corresponding author: liurongzy@163.com liurongzy@163.com 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 1 6 7 8 4 2 6 7 2 3 2 6 6 7 9 5 6 7 8 5 6 7 2 3 2 6 2 10 4 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 2 6 6 7 2 3 4 6 7 6 7 3 5 5 9 6 7 6 7 2 6 7 6 7 5 6 7 6 7 5 12 6 7 5 6 7 6 7 5 6 7 2 10 6 7 2 3 2 3 6 7 4 6 7 6 7 2 6 7 11 5 9 6 7 2 3 11 6 7 5 3 2 6 6 7 Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China Sate Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China Sate Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Key Laboratory of Nuclear Data, China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China Key Laboratory of Nuclear Data, China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, China Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan 523803, China Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan 523803, China University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, China Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, China Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China To verify the performance of the Neutron TOtal Cross-Section Spectrometer (NTOX), the neutron total cross-section of carbon is initially measured in the energy range of 1 eV to 20 MeV using the time-of-flight method. The measurement is performed at the Back-n White Neutron Source with a 76 m time-of-flight path using the China Spallation Neutron Source. A multi-layer fast fission chamber with 235 U and 238 U is employed as the neutron detector. The diameter and thickness of the natural graphite sample are 70 mm and 40 mm, respectively. Signal waveforms are collected using a data acquisition (DAQ) system. Off-line data processing was used to obtain the neutron time-of-flight spectra and transmissions. The uncertainty of the counting statistics is generally approximately 3% for each bin in the energy range of 1 MeV to 20 MeV. It is determined that the results for the neutron total cross-section of carbon obtained using 235 U cells are in good agreement with the results obtained using 238 U cells within limits of statistical uncertainty. Moreover, the measured total cross-sections show good agreement with the broadening evaluated data. CSNS Back-n white neutron source NTOX Neutron total cross-section Carbon Multi-layer fast fission chamber 1. Introduction 1 The neutron total cross-section is a basic quantity for describing the interactions between neutrons with nuclei and is defined as the sum of the probabilities of the interactions of neutrons with nuclei. It provides basic information about the internal structure of the nuclei and its constituents and plays an important role in the development and application of nuclear science and technology. High accuracy neutron total cross-section measurements are necessary to design nuclear devices. Since the 1970s, a large amount of neutron total cross-section data in the energy range of 5 eV to 20 MeV has been obtained via a transmission method at the Oak Ridge Electron Linear Accelerator (ORELA) [ 1 1 ]. With the development of nuclear technology, the measurement method has improved and the detectable energy range of neutrons has expanded. Since the 1990s, numerous neutron total cross-section measurements have been performed with white neutron sources. The total cross-section of carbon and its resonances are very well known [ 2 2 ]. Therefore, it can be used as a reliable standard to evaluate the efficacy of a measurement method. Finlay et al. [ 2 2 ] measured <math id="M1"><mrow><msub><mtext>σ</mtext><mtext>T</mtext></msub></mrow></math> (E) in the neutron energy region, up to 600 MeV for carbon at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) "white" neutron facility using BC404 and the statistical uncertainty was better than 1% for each of several hundred energy bins. The investigators used the resonances of carbon to fit the neutron flight path. Abfalterer et al. [ 4 4 ] successfully obtained the total cross-section measurement of natural carbon in the neutron energy region from 0.75 MeV to 11.3 MeV at the LANL using a NE213 liquid scintillator and the statistical uncertainty was better than 2% over the entire energy range. Abfalterer et al. [ 5 5 ] measured <math id="M2"><mrow><msub><mtext>σ</mtext><mtext>T</mtext></msub></mrow></math> ( E ) in the neutron energy range of 5 MeV to 600 MeV for carbon at the LANL using BC404. Danon et al. [ 2 2 ] investigated the use of the filtered beam method to measure <math id="M3"><mrow><msub><mtext>σ</mtext><mtext>T</mtext></msub></mrow></math> ( E ) in the neutron energy range of 24 keV to 940 keV for carbon at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). Rapp et al. [ 6 6 ] evaluated the feasibility of determining the neutron total cross-section of a detection system based on measurements of <math id="M4"><mrow><msub><mtext>σ</mtext><mtext>T</mtext></msub></mrow></math> ( E ) of natural carbon in the energy range of 0.4 MeV to 20 MeV. The China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) is a large scientific facility that was completed in May 2018. [ 7 7 ]-[ 9 9 ] The present experiment was conducted at the Back-n white neutron beam line of the CSNS (CSNS-WNS) which can generate a high flux neutron beam that covers a wide energy range from thermal to hundreds of mega-electron-volts [ 10 10 ]. In the present work, a technique for measuring neutron total cross-section is developed using the Neutron TOtal Cross-Section Spectrometer (NTOX) based on a multi-layer fast fission chamber with 235 U and 238 U at the CSNS-WNS. The measurement of the neutron total cross-sections of carbon within the energy range of 1 eV to 20 MeV was performed using the time-of-flight method. The presented results are compared with the evaluated data from ENDF/B-VIII.0 [ 11 11 ] to evaluate the performance of NTOX. 2. Experimental method 1 Neutron total cross-sections are determined by measurement of the transmission, which is the ratio of the neutron counts for an open beam and the sample-in. This parameter can be calculated as follows: <math display="block" id="M5"><mrow><mi>σ</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mo>−</mo><mfrac><mn>1</mn><mrow><mi>n</mi><mi>l</mi></mrow></mfrac><mi>ln</mi><mi>T</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>,</mo></mrow></math> where nl is the number of atoms per unit area of the sample, <math id="M6"><mrow><mi>T</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow></math> is the transmission of the neutrons for the i -th group energy E i . This parameter is not related to the efficiency of a given detector and is described as follows: <math display="block" id="M7"><mrow><mi>T</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mtext>I</mtext></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mtext>I</mtext></msub></mrow><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mtext>O</mtext></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mtext>O</mtext></msub></mrow></mfrac><mo>.</mo></mrow></math> <math id="M8"><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mtext>I</mtext></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow></math> and <math id="M9"><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mtext>O</mtext></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow></math> are the neutron counts for the sample-in and the open-beam and <math id="M10"><mrow><msub><mi>P</mi><mtext>I</mtext></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M11"><mrow><msub><mi>P</mi><mtext>O</mtext></msub></mrow></math> are proton counts for the sample-in and the open beam, respectively. The transmission is measured using a multi-layer fast fission chamber with 235 U and 238 U with standard fission cross-sections [ 12 12 ][ 13 13 ]. Given that the chamber has no gamma background effect, it is ideal for use as a neutron detector for total cross-section measurements at the CSNS-WNS. To reduce the influence of neutron scattering and to improve the accuracy of the measurement, the diameter of the cylindrical sample should be larger than the beam spot diameter and the shadow of the sample should completely cover the front of the detector. The neutron energy is measured via a time-of-flight method. The neutrons were produced by spallation of a 1.6 GeV proton beam with a beam power of 20 kW, a pulse frequency of 25 Hz and a pulse width of 50 ns incident on a tungsten target at the CSNS [ 14 14 ]. The neutron source has two modes: a single mode and a double mode. The measurement was performed in the double mode with an interval between the two bunches of approximately 410 ns, whereby the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of a bunch is 50 ns. The white neutron spectrum is shown in Fig. 1 Fig. 1 . 3. NTOX 1 NTOX was established as a spectroscopic approach for high precision measurement of the neutron total cross-section of some elements. It consists of a multi-layer fast fission chamber, front-end electronics, data acquisition (DAQ), and a sample changer. Based on the CSNS-WNS and multi-layer fast fission chamber, the neutron total cross-sections can be obtained in a wide energy region in a single measurement and more neutrons can be measured in a short time. 3.1 Experimental arrangement 2 The arrangement for the total cross-section experiment should exhibit "good geometry", including the target, collimators, sample changer, and neutron detector, as shown in Fig. 2 Fig. 2 . Two experimental stations, i.e., Endstation#1 and #2 are constructed in the neutron beam line [ 10 10 ]. A sample changer that can hold several samples is located at Endstation#1. The neutron detector is at Endstation#2, which is a distance of approximately 76 m from the spallation target. The distance between the sample and the detector is approximately 20 meters. The scattered neutrons can be reduced for this distance and good collimation between the sample and the detector. There are two collimators in the neutron beam line and their diameters can be selected. The diameter of the detector is 50 mm, and the diameter of collimator2 is set to be 30 mm, whereas the diameter of collimator 1 is 60 mm. 3.2 Detection system 2 A multi-layer fast ionization chamber is located in the neutron beam line at Endstation#2, as shown in Fig. 3 Fig. 3 [ 16 16 ]. Three 235 U and three 238 U cells are located in the detector. By counting and analyzing the fission events of 235 U (n, f) and 238 U (n, f) reactions, the neutron counts can be determined. The fission signal was collected by the MSI-8 preamplification and the Back-n public DAQ system that was developed by the University of Science and Technology of China. The DAQ system mainly includes an SCM module (Signal conditioning module), an FDM module (Field Digitizing module), a TCM module (Trigger & Clock module) and a data center for storing waveform data [ 17 17 ]. The start signal of the FDM module is provided by the TCM, and the trigger signal of the TCM is provided by the external T0 signal. This signal originates from the accelerator proton target signal The block diagram of the entire detection system is shown in Fig. 4 Fig. 4 . The proton monitor at the CSNS is used to measure the proton count, which is then used to normalize the neutron count. The acquired neutron signals are then saved in the DAQ data center for offline processing after the experiment is completed. The UTC of each proton pulse corresponds to that of every event number in the DAQ data center. 3.3 Sample 2 To increase the accuracy of the measurements, the number of scattered neutrons must be minimized. The main contribution of the scattered neutrons depends on the size of the sample and its position in the NTOX. Considering the scattering process, the sample should be smaller and thinner. A thick sample should be selected if the statistics of the neutron counts are emphasized. Taking both factors into consideration, a T of 0.5 to 0.7 is preferred in the actual measurement [ 18 18 ]. A simulation based on the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code was performed to determine the thickness of the sample. The sample used in this work was a cylindrical natural graphite. The results indicate that the neutron energy range corresponding to a transmission of 0.5 to 0.7 is 2 MeV to 20 MeV when the graphite sample is 40 mm thick and the total cross-section of the resonance region in carbon is more desirable. The physical parameters of the sample used in the experiment are given in Table 1 Table 1 . The calculated density of the sample was 1.86 g/cm 3 , which is lower than the normal graphite density (2.25 g/cm 3 ). Preliminary judgment is that this 17% difference is caused by the production process. Therefore, the atomic density (0.3741 atoms/barn) should be an apparent value. 1 1 Sample 1 1 Diameter (mm) 1 1 Thickness (mm) 1 1 Mass (g) 1 1 Graphite 1 1 70.07±0.02 1 1 　40.03±0.02 1 1 287.79±0.01　 A sample changing system was used to change the sample’s position in a few seconds, as shown in Fig. 5 Fig. 5 . The sample holders can mount several samples and they are positioned at the top of the sample changer. In addition, they can be driven horizontally and vertically. By centering a sample before measurements are performed and recording the data at the center of a neutron beam, samples could be moved to the expected positions using a motor controlled by a computer in the control room. The positioning accuracy is 0.001 mm. 4. Results 1 The total data acquisition time for the graphite sample was 32.4 h and the total time for the open beam was 14.6 hr. The experimental data can be analyzed using a C++ program and ROOT [ 19 19 ]. The raw data could be decoded to Root files that contain amplitude and time information of the signals, and then this information could be extracted using the C++ program. 4.1 Amplitude spectra 2 The amplitude distributions of the 235 U and 238 U fission cells in addition to the measured backing and alpha signals are shown in Fig. 6 Fig. 6 . The signal amplitude is mainly due to α-particle decay and electronic noise, and it must be subtracted from the neutron spectrum. The threshold could be determined by analyzing the amplitude spectrum. It is the center of the amplitude spectrum valley. 4.2 Energy calibration 2 The neutron energy <math id="M12"><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mtext>n</mtext></msub></mrow></math> is given as follows: <math display="block" id="M13"><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mtext>n</mtext></msub><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>m</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><msup><mi>c</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mfrac><mn>1</mn><mrow><msqrt><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>−</mo><msubsup><mi>β</mi><mi>n</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></msqrt></mrow></mfrac><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>,</mo></mrow></math> where <math id="M14"><mrow><msub><mi>m</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></mrow></math> is the mass of a neutron and c is the speed of light, <math id="M15"><mrow><msub><mi>β</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>υ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></mrow><mi>c</mi></mfrac><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mi>L</mi><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>f</mi></mrow></mfrac></mrow></math> where <math id="M16"><mrow><msub><mi>υ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></mrow></math> is the neutron speed, L is the length of the flight path and Tof is the neutron time of flight, which is given as follows: <math display="block" id="M17"><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>f</mi><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub><mo>+</mo><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo></mrow></math> where <math id="M18"><mrow><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> is the start time of the fission signal recorded via the DAQ system, <math id="M19"><mrow><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> is the start time of the gamma flash recorded by this system. It is obtained by measuring gamma-flash at the 90 mm neutron beam window at 2 atm. The details of the measurement method will be presented in another report. <math id="M20"><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> is the gamma-ray time of flight for the flight path, <math id="M21"><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><msub><mi>f</mi><mrow><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mi>L</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>c</mi></mrow></math> . By substituting for <math id="M22"><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>f</mi></mrow></math> and solving for <math id="M23"><mrow><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , we have: <math display="block" id="M24"><mrow><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mi>L</mi><mi>c</mi></mfrac><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><mfrac><mn>1</mn><mrow><msqrt><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>−</mo><mfrac><mn>1</mn><mrow><msup><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></mrow><mrow><msub><mi>m</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><msup><mi>c</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></mfrac><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></mfrac></mrow></msqrt></mrow></mfrac><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow><mo>.</mo></mrow></math> Using a known approximate flight path of 76 m to obtain a neutron time of flight spectrum and then comparing to the one calculated using ENDF/B-VIII.0. [ 12 12 ], the 8.77 eV resonance is determined. By performing a Gaussian fit of the 8.77 eV resonance of 235 U in this work, <math id="M25"><mrow><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>f</mi><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> is determined to be <math id="M26"><mrow><mn>1853660</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>20</mn></mrow></math> ns. Substituting into Eq. (5), a neutron flight path of 75.939 m of the first 235 U fission cell can be obtained. Using the signal for the first 235 U fission cell for sample-in based on the same method, a flight path of 75.938 m is obtained. This value has a difference of 0.013‰ compared to 75.939 m. Similarly, the neutron flight path of the other two 235 U fission cells can be obtained. By using the 235 U and 238 U fission cell geometric distance, the neutron flight path of the three 238 U fission cells can also be obtained, as shown in Table 2 Table 2 . 1 1 Cells 1 1 T gamma (ns) 1 1 L (m) 1 1 Tof gamma (ns) 1 1 U238-1 1 1 -574.8 1 1 75.921 1 1 253.2 1 1 U235-1 1 1 -574.8 1 1 75.939 1 1 253.3 1 1 U235-2 1 1 -573.9 1 1 75.957 1 1 253.4 1 1 U238-2 1 1 -572.7 1 1 75.975 1 1 253.4 1 1 U235-3 1 1 -575.1 1 1 76.011 1 1 253.5 1 1 U238-3 1 1 -574.7 1 1 76.029 1 1 253.6 The uncertainty of the flight path is less than 0.04‰. The difference between the distance between the two fission cells obtained by calculation and the actual geometric distance of the two fission cells is within the uncertainty of the flight path. If the time of flight is known based on Eq. (4) and the flight path, the neutron energy spectrum can be obtained. Figure 7 Figure 7 shows the amplitude-energy two-dimensional distribution of the first 235 U cell when open beam(a) and sample-in (b). When the neutron energy is below 300 keV, there is an amplitude boundary of approximately 250 ch between the fission and α-particle signal in the distribution. When neutron energy is in the range of 300 keV-10 MeV, the boundary is relatively blurred. This is because of the large number of fission events and high energy α-particle events generated by (n, α) reaction. The neutron energy spectra for which the neutron count is normalized by the proton count can be obtained using Eq. (3), as shown in Fig. 8 Fig. 8 . To increase the statistical count of the low-energy region, the bin is larger than that the case when the flight distance (1000 ns / bin) is determined and is divided by log (eV) with 100 bins for each order. 4.3 Total cross-section 2 Using Eq. (2), the transmission with the first 235 U and 238 U fission cell can be obtained based on the normalized energy spectrum, as shown in Fig. 9 Fig. 9 . The neutron total cross-sections with three 235 U and three 238 U fission cells can be obtained using Eq. (1), as shown in Fig. 10 Fig. 10 . The large statistical fluctuation within the energy range of 3–30 eV in Fig. 10 (a) Fig. 10 (a) is derived from insufficient neutron counts (~20 counts/bin) with one fission cell. To increase the statistical count, the count with three identical fission cells can be added. The transmission with 235 U and 238 U fission cells can be calculated after the neutron count is added as follows: <math display="block" id="M27"><mrow><mi>T</mi><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mn>5</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo stretchy="false">]</mo><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>I</mi></msub></mrow><mrow><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>O</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>O</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>O</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo stretchy="false">]</mo><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>O</mi></msub></mrow></mfrac></mrow></math> <math display="block" id="M28"><mrow><mi>T</mi><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mn>8</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>81</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>81</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>81</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>82</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>82</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>82</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>83</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>83</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>83</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo stretchy="false">]</mo><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>I</mi></msub></mrow><mrow><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>O</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>81</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>81</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>81</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>O</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>82</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>82</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>82</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>O</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>83</mn></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>83</mn></mrow></msub><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>83</mn></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo stretchy="false">]</mo><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>P</mi><mi>O</mi></msub></mrow></mfrac><mo>,</mo></mrow></math> where <math id="M29"><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , <math id="M30"><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M31"><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>I</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> are the neutron counts for the sample-in, <math id="M32"><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>O</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , <math id="M33"><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>O</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M34"><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>O</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> are the neutron counts for the open beam with U235-1, U235-2, U235-3, respectively, <math id="M35"><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , <math id="M36"><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M37"><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> are the fission count efficiency, and <math id="M38"><mrow><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>51</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , <math id="M39"><mrow><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>52</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M40"><mrow><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mn>53</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math> are the effective mass for detecting neutrons of 235 U. <math id="M41"><mrow><mi>T</mi><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mn>8</mn></msub></mrow></math> is the transmission with 238 U fission cells after superimposing the neutron count. The neutron count ratio with all the fission cells and the uranium mass ratio for every fission cell are shown in Table 3 Table 3 . The uncertainty of the uranium mass is approximately 1%. The difference between the neutron count ratio with a fission cell and the mass ratio of Uranium is less than 3%. Therefore, the nonuniformity of the uranium distributed on the backing is negligible and the uranium mass can be used in Eq. 6 and Eq. 7 instead of the effective mass. The fission count efficiency and the uranium mass should be only considered when neutron counts are added. 1 1 Fission cell 1 1 Mass ratio 2 1 Neutron count ratio 2 1 Difference between the two ratios 1 1 1 1 1 1 Open beam 1 1 Sample-in 1 1 Open beam 1 1 Sample-in 1 1 U235-2 & U235-1 1 1 1.10 1 1 1.10 1 1 1.10 1 1 0.55% 1 1 0.58% 1 1 U235-3 & U235-1 1 1 1.09 1 1 1.06 1 1 1.06 1 1 2.96% 1 1 3.00% 1 1 U238-2 & U238-1 1 1 1.00 1 1 0.99 1 1 0.99 1 1 0.42% 1 1 0.43% 1 1 U238-3 & U238-1 1 1 0.95 1 1 0.93 1 1 0.93 1 1 1.22% 1 1 1.29% The fission count efficiency of fission cells can be seen in Table 4 Table 4 . The details of the fission count efficiency calculations will be presented in a separate report. 1 1 Fission cell 1 1 Fission count efficiency 1 1 U235-1 1 1 94.91% 1 1 U235-2 1 1 95.03% 1 1 U235-3 1 1 93.93% 1 1 U238-1 1 1 94.43% 1 1 U238-2 1 1 95.42% 1 1 U238-3 1 1 94.81% After the addition, the neutron total cross-section with 235 U and 238 U fission cells are as shown in Fig. 11 Fig. 11 . The statistical uncertainty is less than that with one cell. As shown in Table 5 Table 5 , the neutron statistical uncertainty for each bin with 235 U fission cells is different in different energy regions. Compared to one cell of the 235 U fission cells, the neutron statistical uncertainty is reduced by approximately 45% with three superimposed 235 U fission cells. 1 1 Energy 2 1 Statistical uncertainty per bin 1 1 1 eV to 1.5 keV 1 1 One fission cell 1 1 2.56%–50.10% 1 1 1 1 Three fission cells 1 1 1.44%–29.14% 1 1 1.5 keV to 1 MeV 1 1 One fission cell 1 1 2.68%–16.07% 1 1 1 1 Three fission cells 1 1 1.52%–8.72% 1 1 1 MeV to 2 MeV 1 1 One fission cell 1 1 2.68%–2.94% 1 1 1 1 Three fission cells 1 1 1.52%–1.66% 1 1 2 MeV to 20 MeV 1 1 One fission cell 1 1 2.94%–3.78% 1 1 1 1 Three fission cells 1 1 1.66%–2.11% The neutron statistical uncertainty for each bin with 238 U fission cells is shown in Table 6 Table 6 . Compared to one piece of 238 U fission cell, the neutron statistical uncertainty is reduced by approximately 42% with three superimposed 238 U fission cells. 1 1 Energy 2 1 Statistical uncertainty per bin 1 1 1 MeV to 2 MeV 1 1 One fission cell 1 1 4.56%–17.63% 1 1 1 1 Three fission cells 1 1 2.66%–9.87% 1 1 2 MeV to 20 MeV 1 1 One fission cell 1 1 4.22%–5.58% 1 1 1 1 Three fission cells 1 1 2.43%–3.23% 5. Data analysis 1 5.1 235 U ( n, f ) resonance peak 2 The fission count-neutron energy spectrum is compared with the fission cross-section from ENDF/B-VIII.0 in Fig. 11 Fig. 11 . There is a good agreement for all the fission resonances in the energy range of 5 eV to 20 eV, and only a few differences in some detail structures are observed. In addition to the 8.77 eV resonance peak, there is a good agreement for many resonance peaks, such as 12.4 eV and 19.3 eV in Fig. 12 Fig. 12 . The results indicate that the detection system is reliable. 5.2 Total cross-sections of carbon 2 Given that the width of the proton beam pulse is 50 ns and the beam is in the double mode, it will cause superposition and broadening in the energy region above keV. The effect of the neutron energy spectrum measurement in double mode is approximately 1.8%–8.8% in the energy range of 1 MeV to 20 MeV. Therefore, the evaluated data cannot be directly compared to the experimental results. The carbon data evaluated in ENDF/B-Ⅷ.0 was broadened using the Gaussian function as shown in Fig. 13 Fig. 13 . To achieve broadening, the energy-total cross-sections from ENDF/B-Ⅷ.0 were initially converted into TOF-total cross-section with a flight path of ~76 m and an energy range of 1–20 MeV. Each energy point was then broadened using a standard normal distribution function with an FWHM of 52 ns, a pulse width of 50 ns. The resolution of the detector was 5.7 ns. The broadened data of the single bunch and the double bunch with an interval of 410 ns was then obtained. Finally, the broadened TOF-total cross-sections were converted into energy-total cross-section. From Fig. 13 Fig. 13 , a smaller cross-section of resonance peaks can be seen in the broadened data, and it is caused by the FWHM of 50.3 ns, which is set in the calculation. The presented results are compared with the broadened data in Fig. 14 Fig. 14 . In the energy range of 1–20 MeV, the measured neutron total cross-sections with 235 U fission cells are in good agreement with that the 238 U fission cells and the deviation is from 0.5% to 4.4%; it is generally less than 3%. The measured results with 235 U and 238 U cells are preliminary compared to the broadened data and the deviations are 0.5%–9% and 0.4%–9%, respectively. The experimental result is in good agreement with the evaluated data in ENDF/B-Ⅷ.0 for the 2.077 MeV resonance peak. 5.3 Study on the separation of the measured spectra 2 Based on the unfolding procedure developed by the project team members, the separated neutron spectra were obtained. The unfolding procedure was developed based on the Bayesian principle. More detailed information on the procedure will be provided in an upcoming report that will be published by the project team members. Using the unfolding procedure, the neutron total cross-section of the single bunch can be obtained, as shown in Fig. 15 Fig. 15 . The neutron total cross-section after unfolding is generally consistent with the broadened single mode data. The results for the 238 U fission cells fluctuate greatly in the range of 1 MeV to 1.5 MeV due to the insufficient fission count. In the energy region from 1 MeV to 1.5 MeV, the count of a bin is from 39 counts to 987 counts and the average count is 255 counts/bin. Insufficient fission counts lead to a large error during unfolding. Given the time resolution of the fission chamber and the 50 ns proton bunch width, the 5 MeV and 5.37 MeV peaks are superimposed. Therefore, they are not easily identified in Fig. 15 Fig. 15 . There will be a dedicated short-bunch operation mode with a bunch length of 1.5 ns or 3.3 ns in rms in the future. This mode can be further developed to the single-bunch operation mode. For 1.5 ns, this corresponds to 0.1%–0.6% in rms time resolution for the neutron energy from 10 keV to 100 MeV [ 10 10 ]. 6. Conclusion 1 Based on the CSNS-WNS, NTOX has been established. The first measurement of the neutron total cross-section of natural carbon in the energy region from 1 eV to 20 MeV was successfully performed using the neutron TOF method. A multi-layer fast fission chamber with 235 U and 238 U was used as the neutron detector. The uncertainty due to counting statistics is generally approximately 3% for each bin in the energy range of 1 MeV to 20 MeV. The measured total cross-sections with 235 U fission cells are in good agreement with that with the 238 U fission cells. The deviation is generally less than 3%. The experimental results show that the detection system is reliable and feasible. By broadening the evaluated data in ENDF/B-Ⅷ.0 using a Gaussian function, this work is preliminary compared with the database in the energy range between 1 MeV and 20 MeV and the deviation is generally 0.4%–9%. The results show that NTOX can be used to measure the neutron total cross-section of different samples at the CSNS-WNS in the future. References D.C. Larson , C.H. Johnson , J.A. Harvey et al ., Measurement of the Neutron Total Cross Section of Fluorine from 5 eV to 20 MeV, ORNL/TM-5612 ( 1976 ). Measurement of the Neutron Total Cross Section of Fluorine from 5 eV to 20 MeV, ORNL/TM-5612 Y. Danon , R.C. Block , M. Rapp et al ., High-accuracy filtered neutron beam and high-energy transmission measurements at the Gaerttner Laboratory . Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology ( Nice, France , 22-27 April 2007 ) High-accuracy filtered neutron beam and high-energy transmission measurements at the Gaerttner Laboratory R.W. Finaly , W.P. Abfalterer , G. Fink et al ., Neutron total cross sections at intermediate energies , Phys. Rev. C 47 , 237 ( 1993 ). Neutron total cross sections at intermediate energies W.P. Abfalterer , R.W. Finlay , S.M. Grimes , Level widths and level densities of nuclei in the 32≤A≤60 mass region inferred from fluctuation analysis of total neutron cross sections , Phys. Rev. C 62 , 064312 ( 2000 ). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.62.064312 http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.064312 Level widths and level densities of nuclei in the 32≤A≤60 mass region inferred from fluctuation analysis of total neutron cross sections W.P. Abfalterer , F.B. Bateman , F.S. Dietrich et al ., Measurement of neutron total cross sections up to 560 MeV , Phys. Rev. C 63 , 044608 ( 2001 ). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.63.044608 http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.044608 Measurement of neutron total cross sections up to 560 MeV M. J. Rapp , Y. Danon , F.J. Saglime et al ., Beryllium and Graphite Neutron Total Cross-Section Measurements from 0.4 to 20 MeV , NSE 172 , 268 - 277 ( 2012 ). doi: 10.13182/NSE11-55 http://doi.org/10.13182/NSE11-55 Beryllium and Graphite Neutron Total Cross-Section Measurements from 0.4 to 20 MeV S.X. Fang , Physics Parameters and Design Study for the Beijing Spallation Neutron Source , J.Kor. Phys. Soc . 48 , 697 ( 2006 ). Physics Parameters and Design Study for the Beijing Spallation Neutron Source J. Wei , H.S Chen , Y.W Chen et al ., China Spallation Neutron Source: Design, R&D, and outlook , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 600 , 10 ( 2009 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.11.017 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.11.017 China Spallation Neutron Source: Design, R&D, and outlook H. Chen and X.L. Wang , China's first pulsed neutron source , Nature Materials 15 , 689 ( 2016 ). China's first pulsed neutron source Q. An , H.Y Bai , J. Bao et al ., Back-n white neutron facility for nuclear data measurements at CSNS , JINST 12 P07022 ( 2017 ). doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/12/07/P07022 http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/12/07/P07022 Back-n white neutron facility for nuclear data measurements at CSNS D.A. Brown , M.B. Chadwick , R. Capote et al . Nucl. Data Sheets 148 , 11 ( 2018 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001 Nucl. Data Sheets D.A. Brown , M.B. Chadwick , R. Capote et al . Nucl. Data Sheets 148 , 28 ( 2018 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001 Nucl. Data Sheets D.A. Brown , M.B. Chadwick , R. Capote et al . Nucl. Data Sheets 148 , 34 ( 2018 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001 Nucl. Data Sheets H.T. Jing , J.Y Tang , H.Q. Tang et al . Studies of back-streaming white neutrons at CSNS , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 621 , 91 - 96 ( 2010 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.097 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.097 Studies of back-streaming white neutrons at CSNS J. Ren , X.C. Ruan , H.Q Tang et al ., Simulation of the background of experimental end-stations and the collimator system of the CSNS back-streaming white neutron source , NUCL TECHNIQ , Vol. 37 , No. 10 , ( 2014 ). (in Chinese) Simulation of the background of experimental end-stations and the collimator system of the CSNS back-streaming white neutron source J. Wen , Y. Wei , Z. Wen et al ., A multi-layered fast ionization chamber prototype for fission cross section measurements , JINST 13 P07020 ( 2018 ). doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/P07020 http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/P07020 A multi-layered fast ionization chamber prototype for fission cross section measurements Q. Wang , P. Cao , X. Qi et al ., General-purpose readout electronics for white neutron source at China Spallation Neutron Source , Rev Sci Instrum 89 . 1 , 013511 . ( 2018 ). DOI: 10.1063/1.5006346 http://doi.org/10.1063/1.5006346 General-purpose readout electronics for white neutron source at China Spallation Neutron Source Z.H. Wu (ed.), Nuclear Physics Experiment Method ( Atomic energy press , Beijing , 1997 ) Nuclear Physics Experiment Method ROOT , An Object-Oriented Data Analysis Framework , < http://root.cern.ch http://root.cern.ch > An Object-Oriented Data Analysis Framework The authors thank the CSNS Back-n Collaboration for their support. The generous assistance of Dr. Jianguo Qin is gratefully acknowledged. The authors wish to express their appreciation to the reviewers for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions. 10.1007/s41365-019-0660-9 This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (No. 2016YFA0401603), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11675155). 2019-02-12 2019-06-15 2019-06-24 2019-08-12 2019-09-01 2021-04-11 © China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, ChineseNuclear Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Nuclear Science and Techniques. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0660-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0660-9 . 2019 Nuclear Science and Techniques 09 30