Investigation of photon energy absorption properties for some biomolecules

Investigation of photon energy absorption properties for some biomolecules 1 corresp first-author Corresponding author, mburiahi@gstd.sci.cu.edu.eg Corresponding author, mburiahi@gstd.sci.cu.edu.eg mburiahi@gstd.sci.cu.edu.eg 2 1 Department of Physics, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey Department of Physics, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey The mass energy-absorption coefficient ( μ en / ρ ), effective atomic number ( <math id="M1"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> ), and electron density ( <math id="M2"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> ) of some biomolecules with potential application in radiation dosimetry were calculated for their photon energy absorption (PEA) in the energy region of 1 keV to 20 MeV. It was noticed that the values of μ en / ρ , <math id="M3"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , and <math id="M4"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> vary with the energy and composition of the biomolecules. The results for <math id="M5"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> were compared with effective atomic numbers ( <math id="M6"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> ) owing to the photon interaction (PI). Significant differences were noted between <math id="M7"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M8"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> in the energy region of 10 to 150 keV for all of the biomolecules involved. A maximum difference of 45.36% was observed at 50 keV for creatinine hydrochloride. Moreover, the studied attenuation parameters were found to be sharply affected at the K-absorption edge of relatively high- Z elements present in the biomolecules. Photon energy absorption Effective atomic number Electron density Biomolecule 1 Introduction 1 There is considerable interest in radiation dosimetry resulting from photon interaction and photon energy-absorption, especially in medical applications such as radiology and radiation protection. The method in which photons are dissipated in a medium is complicated, and the nature of the mechanism that may occur depends on the photon energy and atomic number of the material. The atomic number for a complex medium (e.g., a biomolecule) is not constant but varies with the photon energy and called the effective atomic number [ 1 1 ]. In fact, there are two types of effective atomic number: the effective atomic number for photon interaction and the effective atomic number for photon energy absorption. <math id="M9"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> is more common because it can be obtained experimentally by using the transmission geometry from the mass attenuation coefficient ( μ/ρ ), which is a convenient parameter for representing the photon interaction. Similarly, <math id="M10"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> is more useful for dose calculation [ 2 2 ], and it can be obtained from the energy absorption coefficient ( μ en / ρ ), which is a convenient parameter for representing the photon-energy absorption in a complex medium [ 3 3 - 6 6 3-6 ]. The parameters of μ/ρ and μ en / ρ are comprehensively discussed in the first two chapters of a book edited by Hine and Brownell [ 7 7 ]. In this book, the mass attenuation coefficient was referred to as the total absorption coefficient, and the mass energy absorption coefficient as the true absorption coefficient. These coefficients are related by the equation [ μ/ρ = μ en / ρ + μ s / ρ ], where μ s / ρ is the scatter absorption coefficient. Briefly, μ/ρ is a measure of the probability of collision between the photon and material in units of mass per unit area. By contrast, μ en / ρ is a measure of the average fractional amount of incident photon energy transferred to the kinetic energy of charged particles as a result of these interactions [ 8 8 ]. These basic quantities, which have been widely used as a reference database, were provided in numerous tabulations and software [ 9 9 - 13 13 9-13 ]. Knowledge of photon energy-absorption parameters such as μ en / ρ , <math id="M11"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , and <math id="M12"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> for biomolecules is important when estimating the radiation biological effect from a dose that is received by biomolecules, which are the main components in tissues [ 2 2 ]. The biomolecule is an organic compound that governs a variety of activities in living organisms. Living systems are made up of various complex biomolecules such as carbohydrates, proteins, nucleic acids, and fats. In particular, proteins catalyze reactions, transport oxygen, and perform other important tasks. For example, creatinine hydrochloride is used for investigations of drug distribution in the body. More knowledge about the importance and applications of selected biomolecules can be found elsewhere [ 8 8 , 14 14 ]. Moreover, photon attenuation parameters for the biomolecules are required in radiography and radiation therapy, where the cross-sectional anatomy is obtained by computer-assisted tomography (CAT) scans [ 15 15 ]. Over the past 15 years, many authors published extensive research based on <math id="M13"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> calculations for different materials using different methods [ 16 16 - 29 29 16-29 ]. Awasarmol et al. [ 18 18 ] studied some organic materials used for radiation dosimetry by using an experimental transmission method in the energy range of 122 to 1330 keV. Elbashir et al. [ 20 20 ] compared the experimental values of <math id="M14"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> with Monte Carlo simulation results by using MCNP5 for six samples of amino acids in the energy range of 0.122 to 1.330 MeV. Kurudirek et al. [ 26 26 ] calculated <math id="M15"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M16"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> for essential biomolecules over a wide range of energies from 10 keV to 1 GeV. However, such studies, chiefly for biomolecules, for <math id="M17"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> appear to be scarce [ 30 30 - 33 33 30-33 ]. Hubbell1977 [ 30 30 ] presented the first study of photon mass attenuation and mass energy-absorption coefficients for H, C, N, O, Ar, and seven mixtures from 0.1 keV to 20 MeV. Later, Singh et al. [ 33 33 ] succeeded for the first time in determining the mass energy absorption coefficient by using Geant4 simulations. Very recently, numerous experiments were performed to determine μ/ρ and <math id="M18"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> for some biological compounds at photon energies of 81, 122, 356, 511, 662, 1170, 1275, and 1332 keV [ 34 34 - 37 37 34-37 ] with significant success. The energy absorption parameters for these biomolecules have not yet been mentioned in the literature, and this is the main goal of the present work. In the present work, photon energy absorption parameters ( μ en / ρ , <math id="M19"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , and <math id="M20"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> ) for the biomolecules given in Table 1 Table 1 are calculated in the energy region of 1 keV to 20 MeV. The interpolation method is applied to extract the values of μ en / ρ at the absorption edges of the biomolecule constituents. The ratios of <math id="M21"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> for the biomolecules to that for water ( <math id="M22"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>RW</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> ) is also reported. The results for <math id="M23"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> are compared with the values of <math id="M24"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , which were investigated in our previous work [ 38 38 ]. Moreover, atypical changes in the photon energy absorption properties are obtained at the K-absorption edge of relatively high- Z elements present in biomolecules are discussed. 1 1 Name 1 1 Formula 1 1 〈 Z 〉 1 1 Creatinine H 1 1 C 4 H 8 ClN 3 O 1 1 4.59 1 1 Glycoprotein 1 1 C 28 H 47 N 5 O 18 1 1 4.02 1 1 Glycine 1 1 C 2 H 5 NO 2 1 1 4.00 1 1 Lactose 1 1 C 12 H 22 O 11 1 1 4.04 1 1 Margaric acid 1 1 C 17 H 34 O 2 1 1 2.87 1 1 Tyrosine 1 1 C 6 H 11 NO 3 1 1 3.71 1 1 Inosine 1 1 C 10 H 12 N 4 O 5 1 1 4.52 1 1 Proline 1 1 C 5 H 9 NO 2 1 1 3.65 2 Methods of Calculation 1 <math id="M25"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> can be calculated by using the values of μ en / ρ , which are obtained by the additivity rule [ 39 39 ]. For a type of biomolecule, the mass energy absorption coefficient is calculated by <math display="block" id="M26"><mrow><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>μ</mi><mrow><mtext>en</mtext></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mi>ρ</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mtext>bio</mtext></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mstyle displaystyle="true"><munder><mo>∑</mo><mi>i</mi></munder></mstyle><msub><mi>w</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>μ</mi><mrow><mtext>en</mtext></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mi>ρ</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mi>i</mi></msub><mn>,</mn></mrow></math> where w i and μ en / ρ are the weight fraction and the mass energy absorption coefficient of the i th constituent element in the biomolecule, respectively. The μ en / ρ values of the constituent elements of the biomolecules are taken from a compilation by Hubbell and Seltzer [ 9 9 ]. Then, <math id="M27"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> is given by <math display="block" id="M28"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mstyle displaystyle="true"><munder><mo>∑</mo><mi>i</mi></munder></mstyle><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><msub><mi>A</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>μ</mi><mrow><mtext>en</mtext></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mi>ρ</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mi>i</mi></msub></mrow><mrow><mstyle displaystyle="true"><munder><mo>∑</mo><mi>j</mi></munder></mstyle><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>j</mi></msub><msub><mi>A</mi><mi>j</mi></msub></mrow><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mi>j</mi></msub></mrow></mfrac><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>μ</mi><mrow><mtext>en</mtext></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><mi>ρ</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mi>j</mi></msub></mrow></mfrac><mn>,</mn></mrow></math> where Z i is the atomic number, A i is the atomic weight, and f i is the fractional abundance of each constituent element provided that i f i =1. <math id="M29"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> can be obtained from Eq. 2 by substituting the mass attenuation coefficient for the mass energy absorption coefficient [ 40 40 , 41 41 ]. The effective electron density is taken into account to determine the likelihood of the Compton effect and is expressed by the relation of <math display="block" id="M30"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>N</mi><mtext>A</mtext></msub><mfrac><mrow><mi>n</mi><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow><mrow><mstyle displaystyle="true"><munder><mo>∑</mo><mi>i</mi></munder></mstyle><msub><mi>n</mi><mi>i</mi></msub><msub><mi>A</mi><mi>i</mi></msub></mrow></mfrac><mtext> </mtext><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mtext>electrons/g</mtext><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mn>,</mn></mrow></math> where N A is Avogadro’s number, and n is the total number of atoms in the biomolecule[ 42 42 ]. The mean atomic number lt; Z gt; is derived from a chemical formula such as lt; Z gt; = i n i Z i /n . Furthermore, another parameter, the effective atomic number relative to water ( <math id="M31"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>RW</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> ), is the ratio between the <math id="M32"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> values of the biomolecule and of water. <math display="block" id="M33"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>RW</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mtext>bio</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mtext>water</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></mfrac><mn>.</mn></mrow></math> For this equation, <math id="M34"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> of water is obtained by using the same method that is utilized for the studied biomolecules. Finally, we use an interpolation method to find μ en / ρ values of the elements in creatinine hydrochloride at the Cl K-edge (2.47 keV). This method is described in our previous work [ 38 38 ]. Briefly, for each of the elements in creatinine hydrochloride, the plot of μ en / ρ vs. the photon energy is a smooth continuous function. Then, by matching a selected energy with the corresponding value of μ en / ρ , we find the value of μ en / ρ at 2.47 keV. 3 Results and Discussion 1 The variations of the mass energy absorption coefficient with photon energy for biomolecules are shown in Fig. 1 Fig. 1 . It can be seen that μ en / ρ depends not only on the chemical compositions of the biomolecules but also on the photon energy. The energy dependence of μ en / ρ can be analyzed by dividing the photon energies into three regions. In the first region, the photon energy is slightly higher than the binding energy of the electrons in their atoms. Here, the photoelectric effect is the predominant process and may cause a sharp change in the attenuation properties owing to the existence of high-Z elements in the sample. As seen in the case of creatinine hydrochloride, there are two values for μ en / ρ at 2.82 keV owing to the chloride K-absorption edge: the upper side with a value of 1.5 × 10 2 cm 2 /g and the lower side with a value of 4.9 × 10 2 cm 2 /g. It should be mentioned that the μ en / ρ values of all constituent elements of creatinine hydrochloride are not available in the compilation by Hubbell and Seltzer [ 9 9 ] at 2.82 keV, so the interpolation method is adopted to find the μ en / ρ values of all constituent elements of creatinine hydrochloride at the K-absorption edge of Cl [ 38 38 , 42 42 ]. It is worth mentioning that all samples except for creatinine hydrochloride consist of low- Z elements. Therefore, the K-absorption edge is not observed because the K-shell binding energy for the low- Z elements is on the order of few hundred electron volts (e.g, it is 543.1 eV for oxygen). Thus, the K-absorption edges do exist but are not detectable, e.g, the weak photons (in the eV range) survive for about 1 μ , and then they are absorbed. The second region exhibits Compton scattering as the main contributor to the attenuation process. The attenuation, in this case, is independent of the effective atomic number and dependent on the electron density. When increasing the photon energy to 1.022 MeV, the third region represented by the pair production becomes the dominant process of the attenuation. These processes will be more apparent in the discussion of the variation of the effective atomic number with the photon energy. The calculation results for <math id="M35"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> with <math id="M36"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> values at various photon energies are given in Tables 2 Tables 2 and 3 3 . In addition, from Figs. 2 Figs. 2 , 3 3 , 4 4 and 5 5 , it can be seen that the variation of <math id="M37"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M38"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> with the energy is approximately similar for all of the biomolecules studied except for abrupt changes (e.g., two values of the attenuation at the same energy) near the K-absorption edge of Cl in creatinine hydrochloride. 1 1 E (MeV) 2 1 Creatinine H 2 1 Glycoprotein 2 1 Glycine 2 1 Lactose 1 1 1 1 <math id="M39"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M40"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M41"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M42"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M43"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M44"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M45"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M46"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 1.00E-03 1 1 7.952 1 1 7.952 1 1 7.122 1 1 7.121 1 1 7.274 1 1 7.274 1 1 7.304 1 1 7.303 1 1 1.50E-03 1 1 8.029 1 1 8.030 1 1 7.150 1 1 7.151 1 1 7.298 1 1 7.299 1 1 7.333 1 1 7.334 1 1 2.00E-03 1 1 8.094 1 1 8.094 1 1 7.166 1 1 7.168 1 1 7.310 1 1 7.313 1 1 7.349 1 1 7.351 1 1 3.00E-03 1 1 12.952 1 1 12.783 1 1 7.181 1 1 7.189 1 1 7.321 1 1 7.330 1 1 7.364 1 1 7.373 1 1 4.00E-03 1 1 13.239 1 1 13.142 1 1 7.181 1 1 7.202 1 1 7.320 1 1 7.340 1 1 7.364 1 1 7.385 1 1 5.00E-03 1 1 13.423 1 1 13.385 1 1 7.170 1 1 7.210 1 1 7.307 1 1 7.347 1 1 7.354 1 1 7.393 1 1 6.00E-03 1 1 13.542 1 1 13.565 1 1 7.148 1 1 7.217 1 1 7.284 1 1 7.353 1 1 7.332 1 1 7.400 1 1 8.00E-03 1 1 13.643 1 1 13.806 1 1 7.066 1 1 7.226 1 1 7.200 1 1 7.359 1 1 7.251 1 1 7.409 1 1 1.00E-02 1 1 13.611 1 1 13.969 1 1 6.930 1 1 7.230 1 1 7.062 1 1 7.362 1 1 7.115 1 1 7.413 1 1 1.50E-02 1 1 13.074 1 1 14.200 1 1 6.391 1 1 7.215 1 1 6.514 1 1 7.344 1 1 6.573 1 1 7.398 1 1 2.00E-02 1 1 12.044 1 1 14.282 1 1 5.761 1 1 7.149 1 1 5.861 1 1 7.277 1 1 5.923 1 1 7.333 1 1 3.00E-02 1 1 9.543 1 1 14.056 1 1 4.868 1 1 6.767 1 1 4.917 1 1 6.892 1 1 4.975 1 1 6.955 1 1 4.00E-02 1 1 7.625 1 1 13.226 1 1 4.460 1 1 6.072 1 1 4.478 1 1 6.184 1 1 4.530 1 1 6.251 1 1 5.00E-02 1 1 6.472 1 1 11.845 1 1 4.276 1 1 5.357 1 1 4.278 1 1 5.440 1 1 4.327 1 1 5.506 1 1 6.00E-02 1 1 5.812 1 1 10.237 1 1 4.184 1 1 4.842 1 1 4.178 1 1 4.893 1 1 4.225 1 1 4.954 1 1 8.00E-02 1 1 5.184 1 1 7.604 1 1 4.102 1 1 4.342 1 1 4.089 1 1 4.352 1 1 4.134 1 1 4.404 1 1 1.00E-01 1 1 4.926 1 1 6.167 1 1 4.070 1 1 4.165 1 1 4.053 1 1 4.159 1 1 4.098 1 1 4.207 1 1 1.50E-01 1 1 4.712 1 1 5.002 1 1 4.041 1 1 4.053 1 1 4.022 1 1 4.036 1 1 4.067 1 1 4.082 1 1 2.00E-01 1 1 4.652 1 1 4.744 1 1 4.032 1 1 4.032 1 1 4.013 1 1 4.013 1 1 4.057 1 1 4.058 1 1 3.00E-01 1 1 4.615 1 1 4.628 1 1 4.026 1 1 4.023 1 1 4.006 1 1 4.003 1 1 4.051 1 1 4.047 1 1 4.00E-01 1 1 4.603 1 1 4.602 1 1 4.024 1 1 4.020 1 1 4.003 1 1 4.000 1 1 4.048 1 1 4.044 1 1 5.00E-01 1 1 4.598 1 1 4.593 1 1 4.022 1 1 4.019 1 1 4.002 1 1 3.999 1 1 4.047 1 1 4.043 1 1 6.00E-01 1 1 4.596 1 1 4.589 1 1 4.022 1 1 4.019 1 1 4.002 1 1 3.998 1 1 4.046 1 1 4.043 1 1 8.00E-01 1 1 4.592 1 1 4.585 1 1 4.021 1 1 4.018 1 1 4.001 1 1 3.997 1 1 4.045 1 1 4.042 1 1 1.00E+00 1 1 4.591 1 1 4.582 1 1 4.021 1 1 4.017 1 1 4.001 1 1 3.997 1 1 4.046 1 1 4.041 1 1 1.25E+00 1 1 4.592 1 1 4.581 1 1 4.022 1 1 4.017 1 1 4.002 1 1 3.996 1 1 4.046 1 1 4.041 1 1 1.50E+00 1 1 4.594 1 1 4.581 1 1 4.023 1 1 4.017 1 1 4.002 1 1 3.996 1 1 4.047 1 1 4.041 1 1 2.00E+00 1 1 4.611 1 1 4.594 1 1 4.031 1 1 4.024 1 1 4.012 1 1 4.003 1 1 4.056 1 1 4.048 1 1 3.00E+00 1 1 4.664 1 1 4.652 1 1 4.059 1 1 4.054 1 1 4.041 1 1 4.036 1 1 4.086 1 1 4.080 1 1 4.00E+00 1 1 4.731 1 1 4.730 1 1 4.094 1 1 4.094 1 1 4.078 1 1 4.078 1 1 4.122 1 1 4.122 1 1 5.00E+00 1 1 4.804 1 1 4.816 1 1 4.132 1 1 4.140 1 1 4.118 1 1 4.127 1 1 4.162 1 1 4.171 1 1 6.00E+00 1 1 4.880 1 1 4.904 1 1 4.172 1 1 4.186 1 1 4.160 1 1 4.176 1 1 4.204 1 1 4.220 1 1 8.00E+00 1 1 5.032 1 1 5.076 1 1 4.252 1 1 4.279 1 1 4.246 1 1 4.275 1 1 4.289 1 1 4.319 1 1 1.00E+01 1 1 5.179 1 1 5.232 1 1 4.330 1 1 4.366 1 1 4.329 1 1 4.367 1 1 4.372 1 1 4.409 1 1 1.50E+01 1 1 5.498 1 1 5.550 1 1 4.505 1 1 4.547 1 1 4.515 1 1 4.560 1 1 4.556 1 1 4.601 1 1 2.00E+01 1 1 5.757 1 1 5.783 1 1 4.649 1 1 4.685 1 1 4.668 1 1 4.707 1 1 4.708 1 1 4.746 1 1 E (MeV) 2 1 Margaric 2 1 Tyrosine 2 1 Inosine 2 1 Proline 1 1 1 1 <math id="M47"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M48"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M49"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M50"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M51"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M52"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M53"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 <math id="M54"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> 1 1 1.00E-03 1 1 6.378 1 1 6.378 1 1 7.008 1 1 7.008 1 1 7.010 1 1 7.009 1 1 6.912 1 1 6.911 1 1 1.50E-03 1 1 6.399 1 1 6.402 1 1 7.037 1 1 7.038 1 1 7.034 1 1 7.035 1 1 6.940 1 1 6.941 1 1 2.00E-03 1 1 6.410 1 1 6.416 1 1 7.053 1 1 7.056 1 1 7.048 1 1 7.050 1 1 6.955 1 1 6.958 1 1 3.00E-03 1 1 6.414 1 1 6.433 1 1 7.067 1 1 7.078 1 1 7.063 1 1 7.069 1 1 6.968 1 1 6.979 1 1 4.00E-03 1 1 6.399 1 1 6.443 1 1 7.066 1 1 7.091 1 1 7.065 1 1 7.080 1 1 6.966 1 1 6.991 1 1 5.00E-03 1 1 6.363 1 1 6.451 1 1 7.051 1 1 7.099 1 1 7.059 1 1 7.087 1 1 6.950 1 1 7.000 1 1 6.00E-03 1 1 6.306 1 1 6.456 1 1 7.023 1 1 7.106 1 1 7.044 1 1 7.094 1 1 6.920 1 1 7.007 1 1 8.00E-03 1 1 6.120 1 1 6.461 1 1 6.922 1 1 7.115 1 1 6.986 1 1 7.102 1 1 6.815 1 1 7.015 1 1 1.00E-02 1 1 5.844 1 1 6.459 1 1 6.758 1 1 7.119 1 1 6.888 1 1 7.106 1 1 6.644 1 1 7.018 1 1 1.50E-02 1 1 4.956 1 1 6.407 1 1 6.133 1 1 7.098 1 1 6.487 1 1 7.098 1 1 6.004 1 1 6.996 1 1 2.00E-02 1 1 4.190 1 1 6.248 1 1 5.440 1 1 7.016 1 1 5.996 1 1 7.051 1 1 5.310 1 1 6.910 1 1 3.00E-02 1 1 3.412 1 1 5.495 1 1 4.523 1 1 6.559 1 1 5.262 1 1 6.772 1 1 4.416 1 1 6.435 1 1 4.00E-02 1 1 3.133 1 1 4.493 1 1 4.127 1 1 5.770 1 1 4.909 1 1 6.242 1 1 4.038 1 1 5.634 1 1 5.00E-02 1 1 3.020 1 1 3.767 1 1 3.953 1 1 5.011 1 1 4.746 1 1 5.669 1 1 3.873 1 1 4.883 1 1 6.00E-02 1 1 2.965 1 1 3.366 1 1 3.866 1 1 4.493 1 1 4.664 1 1 5.238 1 1 3.791 1 1 4.383 1 1 8.00E-02 1 1 2.917 1 1 3.045 1 1 3.790 1 1 4.012 1 1 4.591 1 1 4.804 1 1 3.719 1 1 3.926 1 1 1.00E-01 1 1 2.898 1 1 2.945 1 1 3.760 1 1 3.847 1 1 4.561 1 1 4.646 1 1 3.691 1 1 3.771 1 1 1.50E-01 1 1 2.881 1 1 2.885 1 1 3.734 1 1 3.744 1 1 4.535 1 1 4.546 1 1 3.665 1 1 3.675 1 1 2.00E-01 1 1 2.875 1 1 2.874 1 1 3.725 1 1 3.725 1 1 4.527 1 1 4.527 1 1 3.657 1 1 3.657 1 1 3.00E-01 1 1 2.871 1 1 2.869 1 1 3.720 1 1 3.717 1 1 4.521 1 1 4.518 1 1 3.652 1 1 3.649 1 1 4.00E-01 1 1 2.870 1 1 2.868 1 1 3.717 1 1 3.714 1 1 4.519 1 1 4.516 1 1 3.650 1 1 3.647 1 1 5.00E-01 1 1 2.869 1 1 2.867 1 1 3.716 1 1 3.713 1 1 4.518 1 1 4.515 1 1 3.649 1 1 3.646 1 1 6.00E-01 1 1 2.869 1 1 2.867 1 1 3.716 1 1 3.713 1 1 4.518 1 1 4.515 1 1 3.649 1 1 3.646 1 1 8.00E-01 1 1 2.868 1 1 2.866 1 1 3.715 1 1 3.712 1 1 4.517 1 1 4.514 1 1 3.648 1 1 3.645 1 1 1.00E+00 1 1 2.868 1 1 2.865 1 1 3.715 1 1 3.711 1 1 4.517 1 1 4.513 1 1 3.648 1 1 3.644 1 1 1.25E+00 1 1 2.869 1 1 2.865 1 1 3.716 1 1 3.711 1 1 4.518 1 1 4.513 1 1 3.649 1 1 3.644 1 1 1.50E+00 1 1 2.870 1 1 2.866 1 1 3.717 1 1 3.711 1 1 4.518 1 1 4.513 1 1 3.649 1 1 3.644 1 1 2.00E+00 1 1 2.876 1 1 2.870 1 1 3.725 1 1 3.717 1 1 4.526 1 1 4.519 1 1 3.657 1 1 3.650 1 1 3.00E+00 1 1 2.896 1 1 2.892 1 1 3.752 1 1 3.746 1 1 4.552 1 1 4.547 1 1 3.683 1 1 3.678 1 1 4.00E+00 1 1 2.921 1 1 2.921 1 1 3.785 1 1 3.785 1 1 4.584 1 1 4.585 1 1 3.715 1 1 3.716 1 1 5.00E+00 1 1 2.949 1 1 2.955 1 1 3.821 1 1 3.829 1 1 4.619 1 1 4.627 1 1 3.751 1 1 3.758 1 1 6.00E+00 1 1 2.979 1 1 2.990 1 1 3.860 1 1 3.874 1 1 4.656 1 1 4.669 1 1 3.788 1 1 3.802 1 1 8.00E+00 1 1 3.040 1 1 3.060 1 1 3.938 1 1 3.965 1 1 4.729 1 1 4.754 1 1 3.864 1 1 3.890 1 1 1.00E+01 1 1 3.100 1 1 3.127 1 1 4.015 1 1 4.049 1 1 4.800 1 1 4.832 1 1 3.939 1 1 3.972 1 1 1.50E+01 1 1 3.241 1 1 3.273 1 1 4.187 1 1 4.228 1 1 4.955 1 1 4.993 1 1 4.107 1 1 4.147 1 1 2.00E+01 1 1 3.362 1 1 3.389 1 1 4.330 1 1 4.366 1 1 5.082 1 1 5.114 1 1 4.247 1 1 4.282 The <math id="M67"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M68"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> values for creatinine hydrochloride regularly increase to 4 to 15 keV, and then regularly decrease to 200 to 600 keV (see Fig. 3 Fig. 3 ). After that, these values remain almost constant up to 1.5 to 2 MeV. From 2.0 MeV, they increase with the photon energy to 20 MeV. By comparing Z PAeff , <math id="M69"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , and <math id="M70"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>RW</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , we noticed that <math id="M71"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>RW</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> does not show strong energy dependence. For example, it takes values between 1 and 3 for all of the biomolecules studied along the considered photon energy range. This parameter is a rough estimate to mimic the scan in the patient. Furthermore, lt; Z gt; is equal to the effective atomic numbers over a wide energy range around 1 MeV where Compton scattering is the main process. The variation of <math id="M72"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> is attributed to the relative domination of partial photon attenuation. In fact, there is a unique effective atomic number for each attenuation process. For example, for the attenuation values that come from photoelectric absorption, one can obtain the effective atomic number of the photoelectric absorption and so on for other attenuation processes. In this work, the total effective atomic number (for all attenuation processes) is investigated. At low energies, the photoelectric effect is dominant, and hence the effective atomic numbers are mainly described by this partial process. In addition, the contribution owing to scattering and pair production processes will be greater in comparison with the photoelectric effect at higher energies. This will influence the effective atomic numbers for both photon energy absorption and photon interaction. Hence, at low energies where the photoelectric effect dominates, the values of <math id="M73"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> are high; and at higher energies where Compton scattering and pair production processes dominate, the values of <math id="M74"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> are low. Therefore, the effective atomic numbers vary from a higher value at the region of low energy to a lower value at regions of high energy. The apparent peak in the attenuation properties ( μ en / ρ , <math id="M75"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , and <math id="M76"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> ) results from the photoelectric effect around the K-absorption edge of Cl. Since none of the biomolecules except for creatinine hydrochloride consist of relatively high-Z constituent elements, the photoelectric effect is not dominant in the attenuation process. Therefore, the effective atomic numbers decrease up to 600 keV without any peaks. The present calculated results resemble the results of Manohara and Hanagodimath [ 31 31 , 42 42 ], who published studies of <math id="M77"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> for some amino acids. For creatinine hydrochloride, two different values of <math id="M78"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> appear at a specific energy owing to the nonuniformity of the mass energy absorption and mass attenuation coefficients. Therefore, two values for each <math id="M79"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> were obtained at the K-absorption edge of Cl (chloride): one corresponding to the lower side and the other corresponding to the upper side of the same photon energy. Fig. 6 Fig. 6 shows the % difference between <math id="M80"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M81"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> in the energy range of 1 to 20 MeV for all of the biomolecules studied. It is clear that significant differences exist between <math id="M82"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M83"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> in the energy region of 10-150 keV for the given biomolecules. Maximum differences up to 45.36 % are observed for creatinine hydrochloride at 50 keV. In addition, there is a shift in the corresponding energy positions at which the maximum values of <math id="M84"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M85"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> occur for the given biomolecules. It is worth noting that the considerable discrepancies between <math id="M88"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M89"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> exist between the transition energies from the photoelectric effect to Compton scattering. The transition energy width between the two extremes is not the same for photon energy absorption and photon interaction. These ranges of transition energy can be obtained by assuming that the photoelectric effect is dominant at low energies up to where the maximum value of the effective atomic numbers occurs. Compton scattering is dominant at intermediate energies where the value of the effective atomic numbers is almost constant. The energy width that lies between the end of the dominance of the photoelectric effect and the beginning of the dominance of Compton scattering was taken into consideration as a transition energy width between the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering. Therefore, from Fig. 2 Fig. 2 in the case of creatinine hydrochloride, it can be seen that the transition energy range for photon energy absorption is from 0.02 to 0.8 MeV, whereas for photon interaction it occurs from 0.008 to 0.8 MeV. For other biomolecules, the transition energy range between the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering can be discussed in the same manner. Hence, it can be noted that the transition energy from photoelectric absorption to Compton scattering shifts to higher energies for photon energy absorption (e.g., in the case of creatinine hydrochloride to 20 keV) when compared with photon interaction (e.g., in the case of creatinine hydrochloride to 8 keV). This may occur because (i) the photoelectric effect is dominant for the given biomolecules in the low-energy region, and (ii) the photoelectric effect is more important than Compton scattering for photon energy absorption. Given the discrepancies that exist between <math id="M90"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M91"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , it could be preferable to use <math id="M92"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> rather than <math id="M93"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> in medical dosimetry because <math id="M94"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> represents the absorbed dose [ 31 31 ]. On the other hand, the discrepancies between <math id="M95"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M96"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> are insignificant ( < 1%) below 20 keV and above 200 keV; thus, either <math id="M97"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> or <math id="M98"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> can be used at these energies. The relationship between the effective electron density ( <math id="M99"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> ) and <math id="M100"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> values for the biomolecules is shown in Fig. 7 Fig. 7 . The variation is smooth and linear because the effective electron densities are directly related to the effective atomic numbers. Likewise, the variation of <math id="M101"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M102"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>RW</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> as a function of <math id="M103"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M104"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>RW</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , respectively, has the same behavior. Thus, the energy dependence of <math id="M105"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , <math id="M106"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> , and <math id="M107"><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>RW</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> is similar to their corresponding effective atomic numbers and can be explained in the same manner. The accuracy of the calculated results of the effective atomic numbers is based on μ en / ρ . The values of μ en / ρ for biomolecule constituent elements were taken from a compilation by Hubbell and Seltzer [ 9 9 ]. Hubbell reported that the envelope of the uncertainty of the mass attenuation coefficient is on the order of 1 to 2% in the energy range from 5 keV to a few MeV [ 43 43 ]. In the region of energies between 1 and 4 keV, the discrepancies are known to reach a value of 25 to 50%. In addition, significant discrepancies below 4 keV and new theoretical results of higher accuracy were derived in near-edge soft X-ray regions [ 44 44 ]. In all cases, the calculated results by Eq. 3 are usually considered to be accurate within about 10% of the values that were determined experimentally [ 45 45 ]. 4 Conclusion 1 In this work, photon energy absorbation parameters were calculated in the energy region of 1 to 20 MeV for some biomolecules of dosimetry interest. The variations of the atomic number with the photon energy were attributed to partial photon processes. The existence of relatively high- Z elements in the samples altered the attenuation properties around their own K-absorption edges. Significant differences up to 45.36% were observed between <math id="M110"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math id="M111"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> in the energy region around 50 keV. Hence, it is recommended to use <math id="M112"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PEA</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> rather than <math id="M113"><mrow><msub><mi>Z</mi><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>PI</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext>eff</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></mrow></math> for the calculation of absorbed doses in radiation therapy. References G.J. Hine , The effective atomic numbers of materials for various gamma ray interactions , Phys. Rev , 85 , 725 - 737 ( 1952 ). The effective atomic numbers of materials for various gamma ray interactions J.H. Hubbell , Photon mass attenuation and energy-absorption coefficients , Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot . 33 ( 11 ), 1269 - 1290 ( 1982 ). doi: 10.1016/0020-708X(82)90248-4 http://doi.org/10.1016/0020-708X(82)90248-4 Photon mass attenuation and energy-absorption coefficients J.S. Revathy , J. Anooja , R.B. Krishnaveni et al ., Effective atomic numbers in some food materials and medicines for γ-ray attenuation using 137Cs γ-ray , Pramana-J. Phys . 90 , 72 ( 2018 ). doi: 10.1007/s12043-018-1570-9 http://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1570-9 Effective atomic numbers in some food materials and medicines for γ-ray attenuation using 137Cs γ-ray R.S. Niranjan , B. Rudraswamy and N. Dhananjaya , Effective atomic number, electron density and kerma of gamma radiation for oxides of lanthanides , Pramana-J. Phys . 78 , 451 - 458 ( 2012 ). doi: 10.1007/s12043-011-0247-4 http://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-011-0247-4 Effective atomic number, electron density and kerma of gamma radiation for oxides of lanthanides O. Eyecioglu , A.M. El-Khayatt , Y. Karabul et al ., A study on compatibility of experimental effective atomic numbers with those predicted by ZXCOM , Nucl. Sci. Tech . 28 , 63 ( 2017 ). doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0220-0 http://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0220-0 A study on compatibility of experimental effective atomic numbers with those predicted by ZXCOM S.R. Manohara , S.M. Hanagodimath , K.S. Thind et al ., The effective atomic number revisited in the light of modern photon-interaction cross-section databases , Appl. Radiat. Isot . 68 ( 4–5 ), 784 - 787 ( 2010 ). doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.09.047 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.09.047 The effective atomic number revisited in the light of modern photon-interaction cross-section databases G.J. Hine and G.L. Brownell , Radiation dosimetry , Academic Prss Inc. , New York , 1956 . doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4832-3257-7.50001-9 http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3257-7.50001-9 Radiation dosimetry B.M. Ladhaf and P.P. Pawar , Studies on mass energy-absorption coefficients and effective atomic energy-absorption cross sections for carbohydrates , Radiat. Phys. Chem . 109 , 89 - 94 ( 2015 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.12.015 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.12.015 Studies on mass energy-absorption coefficients and effective atomic energy-absorption cross sections for carbohydrates J.H. Hubbell , S.M. Seltzer , Tables of X-Ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 Additional substances of Dosimetric Interest , NIST Standard Reference Database 126 ( 1995 ). doi: 10.18434/T4D01F http://doi.org/10.18434/T4D01F Tables of X-Ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 Additional substances of Dosimetric Interest C.T. Chantler , Theoretical form factor, attenuation, and scattering tabulation for Z= 1–92 from E= 1–10 eV to E= 0.4–1.0 MeV , J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data , 24 ( 1 ), 71 - 643 ( 1995 ). doi: 10.1063/1.555974 http://doi.org/10.1063/1.555974 Theoretical form factor, attenuation, and scattering tabulation for Z= 1–92 from E= 1–10 eV to E= 0.4–1.0 MeV M.J. Berger , J.H. Hubbell , S.M. Seltzer et al ., XCOM: photon cross sections database , NIST Standard Reference Database 8 ( 1998 ). doi: 10.18434/T48G6X http://doi.org/10.18434/T48G6X XCOM: photon cross sections database L. Gerward , N. Guilbert , K. B. Jensen et al ., WinXCom - a program for calculating X-ray attenuation coefficients , Radiat. Phys. Chem . 71 , 653 - 654 ( 2004 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.040 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.040 WinXCom - a program for calculating X-ray attenuation coefficients C.T. Chantler et al ., X-Ray Form Factor, Attenuation and Scattering Tables , NIST Standard Reference Database 66 ( 2005 ). doi: 10.18434/T4HS32 http://doi.org/10.18434/T4HS32 X-Ray Form Factor, Attenuation and Scattering Tables S. Gowda , S. Krishnaveni and R. Gowda , Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities in amino acids and sugars in the energy range 30–1333 keV , Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B . 239 , 361 - 369 ( 2005 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2005.05.048 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2005.05.048 Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities in amino acids and sugars in the energy range 30–1333 keV D.F. Jackson , H.J. David , X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures , Phys. Rep . 70 , 169 - 233 ( 1981 ). doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(81)90014-4 http://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(81)90014-4 X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures G.K. Sandhu , K. Singh , B.S. Lark et al ., Molar extinction coefficients of some fatty acids , Radiat. Phys. Chem . 65 , 211 - 2015 ( 2002 ). doi: 10.1016/S0969-806X(02)00269-4 http://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(02)00269-4 Molar extinction coefficients of some fatty acids A. Kumar , Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities of nucleobases in DNA , Radiat. Phys. Chem . 127 , 48 - 55 ( 2016 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.06.006 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.06.006 Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities of nucleobases in DNA V.V. Awasarmol , D.K. Gaikwad , S.D. Raut et al ., Photon interaction study of organic nonlinear optical materials in the energy range 122–1330 keV , Radiat. Phys. Chem ., 130 , 343 - 350 ( 2017 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.09.012 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.09.012 Photon interaction study of organic nonlinear optical materials in the energy range 122–1330 keV Y. Elmahroug , B. Tellili , C. Souga et al ., Determination of total mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for different shielding materials , Ann. Nucl. Energy 75 , 268 - 274 ( 2015 ). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.015 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.015 Determination of total mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for different shielding materials B.O. Elbashir , M.G. Dong , M.I. Sayyed et al ., Comparison of Monte Carlo simulation of gamma ray attenuation coefficients of amino acids with XCOM program and experimental data , Results Phys ., 9 , 6 - 11 ( 2018 ). doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.075 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.075 Comparison of Monte Carlo simulation of gamma ray attenuation coefficients of amino acids with XCOM program and experimental data B. Akça , S.Z. Erzeneoğlu , The mass attenuation coefficients, electronic, atomic, and molecular cross sections, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities for compounds of some biomedically important elements at 59.5 keV , Sci. Technol. Nucl. Ins ., 901465 ( 2014 ). doi: 10.1155/2014/901465 http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/901465 The mass attenuation coefficients, electronic, atomic, and molecular cross sections, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities for compounds of some biomedically important elements at 59.5 keV B.S. Sidhu , A.S. Dhaliwal , K.S. Mann et al ., Study of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for some low Z compounds of dosimetry interest at 59.54 keV incident photon energy , Ann. Nucl. Energy 42 , 153 - 157 ( 2012 ). doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.015 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.015 Study of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for some low Z compounds of dosimetry interest at 59.54 keV incident photon energy N.A.B. Amin , J. Zukhi , N.A. Kabir et al ., Determination of effective atomic numbers from mass attenuation coefficients of tissue-equivalent materials in the energy range 60 keV-1.33 MeV , J. Phys.: Conf. Ser . 851 012018 ( 2017 ). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/851/1/012018 http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/851/1/012018 Determination of effective atomic numbers from mass attenuation coefficients of tissue-equivalent materials in the energy range 60 keV-1.33 MeV H.C. Manjunatha , B. Rudraswamy , Study of effective atomic number and electron density for tissues from human organs in the energy range of 1 keV–100 GeV , Health Phys . 104 ( 2 ), 158 - 162 ( 2013 ). doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31827132e3 http://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e31827132e3 Study of effective atomic number and electron density for tissues from human organs in the energy range of 1 keV–100 GeV V.P. Singh , N.M. Badiger , N. Kucuk , Assessment of methods for estimation of effective atomic numbers of common human organ and tissue substitutes: waxes, plastics and polymers , Radioprotection 49 ( 2 ), 115 - 121 ( 2014 ). doi: 10.1051/radiopro/2013090 http://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2013090 Assessment of methods for estimation of effective atomic numbers of common human organ and tissue substitutes: waxes, plastics and polymers M. Kurudirek , T. Onaran , Calculation of effective atomic number and electron density of essential biomolecules for electron, proton, alpha particle and multi-energetic photon interactions , Radiat. Phys. Chem ., 112 , 125 - 138 ( 2015 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.03.034 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.03.034 Calculation of effective atomic number and electron density of essential biomolecules for electron, proton, alpha particle and multi-energetic photon interactions D. Salehi , D. Sardari , M.S. Jozani , Investigation of some radiation shielding parameters in soft tissue , J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci . 8 ( 3 ), 439 - 445 ( 2015 ). doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2015.03.004 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.03.004 Investigation of some radiation shielding parameters in soft tissue S.R. Manohara , S.M. Hanagodimath , L. Gerward , Studies on effective atomic number, electron density and kerma for some fatty acids and carbohydrates , Phys. Med. Biol . 53 ( 20 ), N377 - 86 ( 2008 ). doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/N01 http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/N01 Studies on effective atomic number, electron density and kerma for some fatty acids and carbohydrates H. Arslan , Photon attenuation parameters for some tissues from Geant4 simulation, theoretical calculations and experimental data: a comparative study , Nucl. Sci. Tech . 30 , 96 ( 2019 ). doi: 10.1007/s41365-019-0617-z http://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0617-z Photon attenuation parameters for some tissues from Geant4 simulation, theoretical calculations and experimental data: a comparative study J.H. Hubbell , Photon Mass Attenuation and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients for H, C, N, O, Ar, and Seven Mixtures from 0.1 keV to 20 MeV , Radiat. Res ., 70 , 58 - 81 ( 1977 ). doi: 10.2307/3574732 http://doi.org/10.2307/3574732 Photon Mass Attenuation and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients for H, C, N, O, Ar, and Seven Mixtures from 0.1 keV to 20 MeV S.R. Manohara and S.M. Hanagodimath , Effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption of essential amino acids in the energy range 1 keV to 20 MeV , Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B , 264 , 9 - 14 ( 2007 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.08.018 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.08.018 Effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption of essential amino acids in the energy range 1 keV to 20 MeV A. Shantappa , S.G. Gounhalli and S.M. Hanagodimath , Energy dependence of effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption of vitamins, IOSR J . Appl. Phys . 2 , 49 - 56 ( 2012 ). Energy dependence of effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption of vitamins, IOSR J V.P. Singh , M.E. Medhat and N.M. Badiger , Photon energy absorption coefficients for nuclear track detectors using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation , Radiat. Phys. Chem . 106 , 83 - 87 ( 2015 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.07.001 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.07.001 Photon energy absorption coefficients for nuclear track detectors using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation M. Singh , A. Tondon , B.S. Sandhu et al ., Energy dependence of radiation interaction parameters of some organic compounds , Radiat. Phys. Chem . 145 , 80 - 88 ( 2018 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.12.020 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.12.020 Energy dependence of radiation interaction parameters of some organic compounds P.P. Pawar and G.K. Bichile , Studies on mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number and electron density of some amino acids in the energy range 0.122–1.330 MeV , Radiat. Phys. Chem . 92 , 22 - 27 ( 2013 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.07.004 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.07.004 Studies on mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number and electron density of some amino acids in the energy range 0.122–1.330 MeV P.S. Kore and P.P. Pawar , Measurements of mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number and electron density of some amino acids , Radiat. Phys. Chem . 98 , 86 - 91 ( 2014 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.12.038 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.12.038 Measurements of mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number and electron density of some amino acids D.K. Gaikwad , P.P. Pawar and T.P. Selvam , Mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers of biological compounds for gamma ray interactions , Radiat. Phys. Chem . 138 , 75 - 80 ( 2017 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.03.040 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.03.040 Mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic numbers of biological compounds for gamma ray interactions B.T. Tonguc , H. Arslan , M.S. Al-Buriahi , Studies on mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for some biomolecules , Radiat. Phys. Chem ., 153 , 86 - 91 ( 2018 ). doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.025 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.025 Studies on mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for some biomolecules M. Kurudirek and Y. Ozdemir , A comprehensive study on energy absorption and exposure buildup factors for some essential amino acids, fatty acids and carbohydrates in the energy range 0.015–15 MeV up to 40 mean free path , Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B . 269 , 7 - 19 ( 2011 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.10.015 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.10.015 A comprehensive study on energy absorption and exposure buildup factors for some essential amino acids, fatty acids and carbohydrates in the energy range 0.015–15 MeV up to 40 mean free path S.R. Manohara , S.M. Hanagodimath and L Gerward , The effective atomic numbers of some biomolecules calculated by two methods: a comparative study , Med. Phys . 36 , 137 - 141 ( 2009 ). doi: 10.1118/1.3030952 http://doi.org/10.1118/1.3030952 The effective atomic numbers of some biomolecules calculated by two methods: a comparative study M. Kurudirek and T. Sinan , Investigation of human teeth with respect to the photon interaction, energy absorption and buildup factor , Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B . 269 , 1071 - 1081 ( 2011 ). DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.03.004 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2011.03.004 Investigation of human teeth with respect to the photon interaction, energy absorption and buildup factor S.R. Manohara and S.M. Hanagodimath , Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities of essential amino acids in the energy range 1 keV–100 GeV , Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B . 258 , 321 - 328 ( 2007 ). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.02.101 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.02.101 Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities of essential amino acids in the energy range 1 keV–100 GeV J.H. Hubbell , Review of photon interaction cross section data in the medical and biological context , Phys. Med. Biol ., 44 ( 1 ), R1 - 22 ( 1999 ). doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/1/001 http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/1/001 Review of photon interaction cross section data in the medical and biological context C.T. Chantler , Detailed Tabulation of Atomic Form Factors, Photoelectric absorption and scattering cross section, and mass attenuation coefficients in the vicinity of absorption edges in the soft X-ray (Z=30–36, Z=60–89, E=0.1 keV–10 keV), Addressing Convergence Issues of Earlier Work , J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data , 29 , 597 - 1048 ( 2000 ). doi: 10.1063/1.1321055 http://doi.org/10.1063/1.1321055 Detailed Tabulation of Atomic Form Factors, Photoelectric absorption and scattering cross section, and mass attenuation coefficients in the vicinity of absorption edges in the soft X-ray (Z=30–36, Z=60–89, E=0.1 keV–10 keV), Addressing Convergence Issues of Earlier Work S. Glasstone and A. Sesonske , Nuclear reactor engineering , Nucl. Sci. Eng . 81 , 484 - 485 ( 1982 ). Nuclear reactor engineering 10.1007/s41365-019-0636-9 2019-01-13 2019-03-19 2019-03-31 2019-06-03 2019-07-01 2021-04-11 © China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, ChineseNuclear Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Nuclear Science and Techniques. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0636-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0636-9 . 2019 Nuclear Science and Techniques 07 30