1.Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2.Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
xingyx@tsinghua.edu.cn
Scan for full text
Xiao-Yue Guo, Li Zhang, Yu-Xiang Xing. Study on analytical noise propagation in convolutional neural network methods used in computed tomography imaging[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2022,33(6):77
Xiao-Yue Guo, Li Zhang, Yu-Xiang Xing. Study on analytical noise propagation in convolutional neural network methods used in computed tomography imaging[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2022,33(6):77
Xiao-Yue Guo, Li Zhang, Yu-Xiang Xing. Study on analytical noise propagation in convolutional neural network methods used in computed tomography imaging[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2022,33(6):77 DOI: 10.1007/s41365-022-01057-3.
Xiao-Yue Guo, Li Zhang, Yu-Xiang Xing. Study on analytical noise propagation in convolutional neural network methods used in computed tomography imaging[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2022,33(6):77 DOI: 10.1007/s41365-022-01057-3.
Neural network methods have recently emerged as a hot topic in computed tomography (CT) imaging owing to their powerful fitting ability; however, their potential applications still need to be carefully studied because their results are often difficult to interpret and are ambiguous in generalizability. Thus, quality assessments of the results obtained from a neural network are necessary to evaluate the neural network. Assessing the image quality of neural networks using traditional objective measurements is not appropriate because neural networks are nonstationary and nonlinear. In contrast, subjective assessments are trustworthy, although they are time- and energy-consuming for radiologists. Model observers that mimic subjective assessment require the mean and covariance of images, which are calculated from numerous image samples; however, this has not yet been applied to the evaluation of neural networks. In this study, we propose an analytical method for noise propagation from a single projection to efficiently evaluate convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in the CT imaging field. We propagate noise through nonlinear layers in a CNN using the Taylor expansion. Nesting of the linear and nonlinear layer noise propagation constitutes the covariance estimation of the CNN. A commonly used U-net structure is adopted for validation. The results reveal that the covariance estimation obtained from the proposed analytical method agrees well with that obtained from the image samples for different phantoms, noise levels, and activation functions, demonstrating that propagating noise from only a single projection is feasible for CNN methods in CT reconstruction. In addition, we use covariance estimation to provide three measurements for the qualitative and quantitative performance evaluation of U-net. The results indicate that the network cannot be applied to projections with high noise levels and possesses limitations in terms of efficiency for processing low-noise projections. U-net is more effective in improving the image quality of smooth regions compared with that of the edge. LeakyReLU outperforms Swish in terms of noise reduction.
Noise propagationConvolutional neural networkImage quality assessment
M.H. Touch, D.P. Clark, W. Barber et al., A neural network-based method for spectral distortion correction in photon counting x-ray CT. Phys. Med. Biol. 61(16), 6132-6153 (2016). doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/16/6132http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/16/6132
M.D. Holbrook, D.P. Clark, C.T. Badea, Deep learning based spectral distortion correction and decomposition for photon counting CT using calibration provided by an energy integrated detector, in SPIE Medical Imaging 2021: Physics of Medical Imaging (2021). doi: 10.1117/12.2581124http://doi.org/10.1117/12.2581124
K.C. Liang, L. Zhang, H.K. Yang et al., A model-based unsupervised deep learning method for low-dose CT reconstruction. IEEE Access 8, 159260-159273 (2020). doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020406http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020406
Y.K. Zhang, D.L. Hu, Q.L. Zhao et al., CLEAR: comprehensive learning enabled adversarial reconstruction for subtle structure enhanced low-Dose CT imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 40(11), 3089-3101 (2021). doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3097808http://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2021.3097808
H.K. Yang, K.C. Liang, K.J. Kang et al., Slice-wise reconstruction for low-dose cone-beam CT using a deep residual convolutional neural network. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 30, 59 (2019). doi: 10.1007/s41365-019-0581-7http://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0581-7
X.R. Yin, Q.L. Zhao, J. Liu et al., Domain progressive 3D residual convolution network to improve low-dose CT imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38(12), 2903-2913 (2019). doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2917258http://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2917258
J. Liu, Y. Zhang, Q.L. Zhao et al., Deep iterative reconstruction estimation (DIRE): approximate iterative reconstruction estimation for low dose CT imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 64(13), 135007 (2019). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab18dbhttp://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab18db
D.L. Hu, J. Liu, T.L. Lv et al., Hybrid-domain neural network processing for sparse-view CT reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma. Med. Sci. 5(1), 88-98 (2021). doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3011413http://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3011413
D. Hu, Y. Zhang, J. Liu et al., DIOR: deep iterative optimization-based residual-learning for limited-angle CT reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging (2022). doi: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3148110http://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2022.3148110
Y.J. Ma, Y. Ren, P. Feng et al., Sinogram denoising via attention residual dense convolutional neural network for low-dose computed tomography. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 41 (2021). doi: 10.1007/s41365-021-00874-2http://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00874-2
W. Fang, D.F. Wu, K. Kim et al., Iterative material decomposition for spectral CT using self-supervised Noise2Noise prior. Phys. Med. Biol. 66(15), 1-17 (2021). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0afdhttp://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac0afd
T.L. Lyu, W. Zhao, Y.S. Zhu et al., Estimating dual-energy CT imaging from single-energy CT data with material decomposition convolutional neural network. Med. Image Anal. 70, 102001 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102001http://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102001
A. Zheng, H.K. Yang, L. Zhang et al., Interweaving network: a novel monochromatic image synthesis method for a photon-counting detector CT system. IEEE Access 8, 217710 (2020). doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3041078http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3041078
K.C. Liang, L. Zhang, H.K. Yang et al., Metal artifact reduction for practical dental computed tomography by improving interpolation-based reconstruction with deep learning. Med. Phys. 46(12), e823-e834 (2019). doi: 10.1002/mp.13644http://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13644
W. Fang, L. Li, Z.Q. Chen, Removing ring artefacts for photon-counting detectors using neural networks in different domains. IEEE Access 8, 42447-42457 (2020). doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2977096http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2977096
P.J. Liu, M. Wang, Y.N. Wang et al., Impact of deep learning-based optimization algorithm on image quality of low-dose coronary CT angiography with noise reduction: a prospective study. Acad. Radiol. 27(9), 1241-1248 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.010http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.010
A. Steuwe, M. Weber, O.T. Bethge et al., Influence of a novel deep-learning based reconstruction software on the objective and subjective image quality in low-dose abdominal computed tomography. Br. J. Radiol. 94(1117), 1-9 (2020). doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200677http://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200677
C. Park, K.S. Choo, Y. Jung et al., CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness. Eur. Radiol. 31(5), 3156-3164 (2021). doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07358-8http://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07358-8
J. Greffier, A. Hamard, F. Pereira et al., Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur. Radiol. 30(7), 3951-3959 (2020). doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06724-whttp://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06724-w
C.T. Jensen, X.M. Liu, E.P. Tamm et al., Image quality assessment of abdominal CT by use of new deep learning image reconstruction: initial experience. AJR 215(1), 50-57 (2020). doi: 10.2214/ajr.19.22332http://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.19.22332
R. Singh, S.R. Digumarthy, V.V. Muse et al., Image quality and lesion detection on deep learning reconstruction and iterative reconstruction of submillisievert chest and abdominal CT. AJR 214(3), 566-573 (2020). doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21809http://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21809
X. He, S. Park, Model observers in medical imaging research. Theranostics 3(10), 774-786 (2013). doi: 10.7150/thno.5138http://doi.org/10.7150/thno.5138
S. Leng, L.Y. Yu, Y. Zhang et al., Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain. Med. Phys. 40(8), 081908 (2013). doi: 10.1118/1.4812430http://doi.org/10.1118/1.4812430
L.Y. Yu, B.Y. Chen, J.M. Kofler et al., Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low-contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT. Med. Phys. 44(8), 3990-3999 (2017). doi: 10.1002/mp.12380http://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12380
G. Kim, M. Han, H. Shim et al., A convolutional neural network-based model observer for breast CT images. Med. Phys. 47(4), 1619-1632 (2020). doi: 10.1002/mp.14072http://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14072
D. Piccini, R. Demesmaeker, J. Heerfordt et al., Deep learning to automate reference-free image quality assessment of whole-heart MR images. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2(3), e190123 (2020). doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020190123http://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2020190123
H. Gong, L.Y. Yu, S. Leng et al., A deep learning- and partial least square regression-based model observer for a low-contrast lesion detection task in CT. Med. Phys. 46(5), 2052-2063 (2019). doi: 10.1002/mp.13500http://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13500
H. Gong, Q. Hu, A. Walther et al., Deep-learning-based model observer for a lung nodule detection task in computed tomography. J. Med. Imaging 7(4), 042807 (2020). doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.042807http://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.042807
H. Gong, J.G. Fletcher, J.P. Heiken et al., Deep-learning model observer for a low-contrast hepatic metastases localization task in computed tomography. Med. Phys. 49(1), 70-83 (2021). doi: 10.1002/mp.15362http://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15362
A. H. Abdelaziz, S. Watanabe, J. Hershey et al., Uncertainty propagation through deep neural networks, in InterSpeech (2015). https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01162550https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01162550
J. Lee, Y Bahri, R. Novak et al., Deep neural networks as Gaussian processes, in the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICRL 2018) (2018). arXiv:1711.00165
R. Tanno, D.E. Worrall, E. Kaden et al., Uncertainty modelling in deep learning for safer neuroimage enhancement: demonstration in diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 225, 117366 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117366http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117366
N. Ueda, R. Nakano, Generalization error of ensemble estimators, in Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN’96), pp. 90-95 (1996). doi: 10.1109/ICNN.1996.548872http://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1996.548872
0
浏览量
0
Downloads
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构