New results for directly searching for dark matter electromagnetic interactions have been reported by the PandaX Collaboration. The study reveals the most stringent upper limits on dark matter charge radius, millicharge, magnetic dipole moment, electric dipole moment, and anapole moment to date. These findings demonstrate that dark matter is significantly darker than previously anticipated.
Dark matter’s existence in the universe has been established through various observations, including galaxy rotation curves, galaxy distributions, and cosmic microwave background radiation [1]. Although astrophysicist Fritz Zwicky first pointed out its existence nearly a century ago [2], the true nature of dark matter particles remains unidentified. As a candidate for dark matter, it is generally assumed that the particles have no interaction with photons. Indeed, if dark matter particles had a similar electric charge to electrons, many observed properties of dark matter in the early and current universe would contradict observations.1
On the other hand, dark matter could possess a suppressed interaction with photons, similar to neutrons, which are electrically neutral but still exhibit electromagnetic interactions such as charge radius, magnetic dipole moments, and anapole moments. This scenario arises in a wide range of models, particularly when dark matter is considered a composite state comprised of charged constituents with a totally neutral charge [3]. Discovering these interactions of dark matter would not only establish the microscopic particle identity of dark matter but also enable measurement of the dark matter composite scale.
In a recent publication in Nature [4], the PandaX Collaboration conducted a search for electromagnetic interactions of dark matter using the 0.63-tonne-year exposure during the PandaX-4T commissioning run. The PandaX-4T experiment features a large detector with 3.7 tonnes of liquid xenon and is situated within the China Jinping Underground Laboratory, the world’s most well-shielded underground facility, located approximately 2400 meters underground. Due to the weak interactions between dark matter and ordinary matter, dark matter particles can traverse the detector and scatter off charged particles such as nuclei and electrons through potential photon-mediated interactions.
During this scattering process, some nuclei acquire recoil energy, typically on the order of 10 keV for a 100 GeV dark matter mass, derived from the kinetic energy of the dark matter particles. This recoil energy is then converted into prompt scintillation photons (S1). Simultaneously, the surrounding electrons are ionized, drift towards the detector’s surface, and generate delayed electroluminescence photons (S2). An illustration of this photon-mediated scattering process and the corresponding dual-phase signature can be seen in Figure 1.
-202306/1001-8042-34-06-001/alternativeImage/1001-8042-34-06-001-F001.jpg)
Thanks to the distinctive dual-phase signature, the PandaX Collaboration is able to utilize the two-dimensional distribution of S1 and S2 photon counts to discern between signal and background events. Owing to the reduced capability of nuclear recoils to induce ionizations, the signal events generated by dark matter exhibit smaller S2 signals compared to background events. The two dominant backgrounds, namely flat ER (including β decay of radon, 85Kr, etc.) and tritium, exhibit higher S2 signals. To effectively mitigate background events, the collaboration employs the S2/S1 ratio as a selection variable, leading to a reduction in background events by two orders of magnitude. In the region of interest, there are 1058 events, which aligns with the expected background event count of 1037± 45.
While the PandaX-4T experiment has not yet discovered dark matter particles, its results contribute significantly to our understanding of dark matter properties and shed light on the question of “how dark is dark matter?” This article investigates five different photon-mediated interactions of dark matter, including charge radius, millicharge, magnetic dipole moment, electric dipole moment, and anapole moments. Each interaction exhibits distinct Lorentz-invariant forms and differential event rates as a function of nuclear recoil energy ER. For example, the millicharge interaction follows a
Dark matter | Neutrino | |
---|---|---|
Charge radius (fm2) | < 1.9 × 10-10 | (-2.1, 3.3) × 10-6 |
Millicharge (e) | < 2.6 × 10-11 | < 4 × 10-35 |
Magnetic dipole (μB) | < 4.8 × 10-10 | < 2.8 × 10-11 |
Electric dipole (e cm) | < 1.2 × 10-23 | <2 × 10-21 |
Anapole (cm2) | < 1.6 × 10-33 | roughly 10-34 |
Knowledge of the constraints on dark matter’s electromagnetic interactions can provide insights into the composite scale of dark matter or the mass scale of other charged states within the dark sector. Taking the example of the magnetic dipole moment for a Dirac fermion χ (the dark matter particle), its relativistic interaction with a photon can be expressed as
In addition to composite dark matter models, electromagnetic interactions of dark matter can also emerge in weakly interacting models like supersymmetry or other dark matter portal models. For instance, in the lepton-portal dark matter model [5], the magnetic dipole moment operator takes the form
In addition to the five dark matter electromagnetic interactions explored in this article, the PandaX Collaboration has the potential to search for other interactions such as dipole-transition or Rayleigh interactions [6]. In summary, the publication in Nature by the PandaX Collaboration [4] showcases the impressive capabilities of the PandaX-4T experiment in the search for dark matter particles. Even with just the data collected during the commissioning run, the experiment has achieved the most stringent constraints on dark matter electromagnetic interactions to date. Undoubtedly, when the collaboration completes their full-scheduled science run in the near future, we can anticipate even more significant advancements in our understanding of dark matter.
Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints
. Phys. Rept. 405, 279-390 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031.Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln
. Helvetica Physica Acta 6, 110-127 (1933).Review of strongly-coupled composite dark matter models and lattice simulations
. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, 1643004 (2016). doi: 10.1142/S0217751X16430041Limits on the luminance of dark matter from xenon recoil data
. Nature 618, 47-50 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05982-0Lepton portal dark matter
. J. High Energ. Phys. 2014, 153 (2014). doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2014)153How dark are Majorana WIMPs? Signals from magnetic inelastic dark matter and Rayleigh dark matter
. Phys. Rev. D 86, 075021 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.075021There is one exceptional situation for super heavy dark matter, where the charge per mass ratio is significantly smaller than that of an electron. In this report and the accompanying paper, the mass of dark matter is assumed to be below a few TeV.