logo

Low power SiPM readout BETA ASIC for space applications

NUCLEAR ELECTRONICS AND INSTRUMENTATION

Low power SiPM readout BETA ASIC for space applications

Anand Sanmukh
Sergio Gómez
Albert Comerma
Joan Mauricio
Rafel Manera
Andreu Sanuy
Daniel Guberman
Roger Catala
Albert Espinya
Marina Orta
Oscar de la Torre
David Gascon
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.35, No.3Article number 59Published in print Mar 2024Available online 03 May 2024
64607

The BETA application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) is a fully programmable chip designed to amplify, shape, and digitize the signal of up to 64 Silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) channels, with a power consumption of approximately ~1 mW/channel. Owing to its dual-path gain, the BETA chip is capable of resolving single photoelectrons (phes) with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) >5 while simultaneously achieving a dynamic range of ~~4000 phes. Thus, BETA can provide a cost-effective solution for the readout of SiPMs in space missions and other applications with a maximum rate below 10 kHz. In this study, we describe the key characteristics of the BETA ASIC and present an evaluation of the performance of its 16-channel version, which is implemented using 130 nm technology. The ASIC also contains two discriminators that can provide trigger signals with a time jitter down to 400 ps FWHM for 10 phes. The linearity error of the charge gain measurement was less than 2% for a dynamic range as large as 15 bits.

Radiation detectorsSilicon photomultipliersPhoton sensorsFront-end electronicsMixed-Mode ASICsSpace technology
1

Introduction

This study presents the fiBer trackEr readouT ASIC (BETA) developed for the readout of SiPM arrays in space applications. BETA has initially been developed to equip different subsystems of the High Energy Cosmic-Radiation Detection (HERD) facility. The HERD has been proposed as one of several particle astrophysics payloads onboard the Future Chinese Space Station (CSS) [1]. The main scientific goals of HERD include searching for dark matter particles, measuring the cosmic-ray spectrum up to PeV energies, and monitoring the gamma-ray sky above 10 MeV.

The core of the experiment was a cubic calorimeter composed of more than 7,000 crystals. From inside to outside, the HERD detector (Fig. 1) consists of a calorimeter (CALO) for measuring the energy of traversing particles and for electron/proton discrimination, a 5-side particle tracking system (the scintillating fiber tracker, FIT [2]) for reconstructing the particle trajectories and identifying the nuclei charge, a plastic scintillator detector (PSD [3, 4]) for the measurement of low energy gamma-rays and for a redundant measurement of the nuclei charge, and a transition radiation detector (TRD) for energy calibration. Additionally, a silicon charge detector (SCD) is also used for charge reconstruction. The BETA ASIC is used in the readouts of the FIT and PSD.

Fig. 1
(Color online) Sketch of the HERD payload. All services and most subsystem electronics are located in the lower plane to maximize the field of view of the instrument. The exploded view (right) of the detector shows the main HERD subsystems [4]
pic

The CSS is the ideal platform for providing the required resources for the HERD payload, which has a mass budget of four tons, a maximum power consumption of 1.2 kW, envelope dimensions of 2.3 m×2.3 ×2.6 m, and an average downlink requirement of 100 Mbps.

Both PSD and FIT are read out with SiPMs and require good resolution and a high dynamic range to track events triggered by minimum ionizing particles (MIPs) and to reconstruct the charge of species up to Fe. The FIT and PSD provide trigger and veto signals for the low-level trigger system of the HERD. Therefore, both require excellent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to achieve precise MIP detection, perform single-photon calibration, and generate precise triggers and veto signals.

The FIT is similar to the scintillator fiber tracker (SciFi) at LHCb (CERN) [5]. To detect the scintillating light of the fibers, a custom-designed SiPM array with a small channel size and a reduced channel pitch (250 m), which approximately matches the fiber spacing in the fiber mats, was used. This SiPM array is based on the LHCb SciFi sensor (S13552-50 SiPM [6]); however, its dynamic range must be increased to allow the charge measurement of high-Z particles. The FIT is based on a modified sensor array with a reduced microcell size (10 μm × 10 μm), which increases the number of microcells from 104 to 3749 (S13552-10 SiPM). Therefore, the dynamic range of the readout ASIC should be greater than 14 bits to measure signals of up to 3749 phes with an SNR >5 for a single phe signal.

To select the optimal PSD layout, two geometries are currently under investigation: one based on long scintillator bars and the other on square tiles, with both layouts being read out by the SiPMs. The main requirements for the PSD include high detection efficiency, a broad dynamic range, and good energy resolution. Different SiPMs are considered and can be combined in a redundant readout (more than one SiPM per tile or bar) to provide optimal performance for the detection efficiency or dynamic range, which is similar to that required by FIT ([3, 4]).

SiPMs are fast photosensors that are sensitive to extremely low photon fluxes and have a relatively high photodetection efficiency. Owing to their robustness, compactness, low-voltage operation, and radiation tolerance, SiPMs have become one of the photodetector options for future space missions [7].

In space applications, where volume, cost, and power budget are always limited, an ASIC capable of reading multichannel SiPMs and providing digital output while minimizing power consumption is crucial. FIT has hundreds of thousands of channels, and the power consumption requirement per channel is 1 mW/ch in a 64-channel system-on-chip. As for PSD, with a much smaller total number of channels, a 16-channel version is preferred to optimize the SiPM signal routing, allowing a slightly relaxed power consumption requirement. Moreover, PSD requires a trigger signal per channel, whereas FIT does not. A trigger signal per ASIC is sufficient for the FIT.

None of the integrated electronics available in the scientific community for SiPM readouts in space applications satisfy the aforementioned requirements. The PACIFIC 64-channel ASIC [8] was developed to read out the LHCb SciFi; however, its dynamic range is lower than 5 bits (only designed for tracking), and its power consumption is approximately 10 mW/channel. The SPHIRA (IDE3380) 16-channel ASIC [9] was designed for gamma spectroscopy; however, its dynamic range is 12 bits, and its power consumption is close to 2 mW/channel. Furthermore, the analog-to-digital converter (ADC) is not integrated on-chip. The CITIROC 32-channel ASIC [10] has a dynamic range lower than 14 bits and a power consumption of approximately 8 mW/channel. Its ADC is not integrated on-chip, and it was not designed to achieve radiation tolerance. The dynamic range of chips, such as LIROC, RADIOROC, and SPACIROC, is below 8 bits; they do not integrate the ADCs on-chip, and their power consumptions exceed 3 mW/channel [11, 12].

2

Circuit design

2.1
Architecture

A block diagram of the 16-channel version of the BETA ASIC is shown in Fig. 2. The front-end architecture is based on a dual-gain channel system that processes the input current from each SiPM anode node. The current is converted into voltage using a resistor divider. Each channel includes a high-gain (HG) and low-gain (LG) preamplifier.

Fig. 2
(Color online) Functional block diagram of the 16-channel version of the BETA ASIC
pic

The output of the HG preamplifier is used to generate the trigger and gain (or path) selection binary signals and for charge measurements. Both binary signals are obtained using a voltage rail-to-rail comparator with hysteresis [13] providing a nonlinear time-over-threshold response. The threshold of a trigger comparator is typically set to a level corresponding to the signal of a few photoelectrons. A global trigger signal is generated as the fast OR of the discriminated trigger output of each channel. In the 16-channel version of the BETA ASIC, the individual trigger signal of each channel is provided as the output signal. The discriminated path selection output is used to internally select the HG or LG signal processing chain depending on the number of detected photons (signal amplitude), thus preventing saturation. The threshold of the path-selection comparator (configurable externally) is typically set to a level corresponding to a signal of 50–100 phes. This setting defines the dynamic range of the HG path. Higher signals are processed via the LG path.

The charge-measurement chain consists of analog shaping, peak detection, and digitization. The shaping stage is divided into an initial first-order Low-Pass Filter (LPF) for each HG and LG preamplifiers. This LPF slows down the signal to allow the digital circuitry to select between the HG and LG signal paths using an analog switch. The selected signal path is followed by a single second-order LPF implemented using a Sallen-Key topology. The peak amplitude of the shaper is captured using a flip-around track-and-hold (T&H) circuit and then digitized. Different parameters (such as gain, shaping time, thresholds, and bias currents) of the ASIC can be controlled using an I2C interface.

The ASIC includes a digital backend to serialize the ADC data in the SEROUT SLVS output and manage different acquisition and trigger modes. Several BETA ASICs can be daisy-chained using SERIN SLVS data input. The TRGOn open-drain trigger output allows the synchronization of the acquisition and serialization of several BETA ASICs.

2.2
Preamplifier

Preamplifiers are based on a closed-loop voltage amplifier with capacitive feedback (Fig. 3) and a tunable gain that can be varied from 4 to 22 for the HG and from 0.3 to 2.4 for the LG (nominal values). A high-value (approximately 10 MΩ) DC feedback resistor Rf was used in parallel to the feedback capacitor Cf to prevent saturation of each preamplifier. Rf allows the discharge of Cf to its baseline with a time constant defined by τf=Rf×Cf. The feedback resistor Rf is implemented as a series combination of a high-value resistor Rf1 and a lower-value resistor Rf2. The high-value Rf1 is implemented using a MOSFET in a diode configuration working in weak inversion as a tunable pseudo-resistor [14]. The pseudoresistor can be tuned from 1 MΩ to 100 MΩ by varying the bias current. The low-value resistor Rf2 is approximately 100 kΩ and provides a faster return to the baseline when baseline restoration (BLR) is applied.

Fig. 3
(Color online) Preamplifier with baseline restoration. Closed-loop configuration based on a custom operational amplifier
pic

The operational amplifier (OpAmp) depicted in Fig. 4 is the basic building block of the different analog processing stages: the HG preamplifier, LG preamplifier, HG filter, LG filter, shaper, T&H, and the output analog buffer. Slight variations were applied to optimize the power consumption of each stage. The circuit depicted in Fig. 4 is a two-stage OpAmp amplifier with rail-to-rail input and output ranges based on the design proposed in [15].

Fig. 4
Two-stage operational amplifier with rail-to-rail input and output range
pic

OpAmp contains a constant transconductance (gm) rail-to-rail input stage and a simple class-AB output stage. The class-AB driver circuit was incorporated into the folded-cascoded summing circuit of the rail-to-rail input stage. The combined summing circuit and class-AB control are biased by a simple floating current source with the same structure as the class-AB control, resulting in a quiescent current that is independent of the supply voltage. OpAmp was compensated using the well-known Miller-splitting technique. The basic characteristics of the operational amplifier are summarized in Table 1 for different temperatures and process corners.

Table 1
Basic operational amplifier parameters over different process and temperature corners
Parameter TTa 27 ℃ SS -20 ℃ SS 20 ℃ SS 80 ℃ FF -20 ℃ FF 20 ℃ FF 80 ℃ FS -20 ℃ FS 20 ℃ FS 80 ℃ SF -20 ℃ SF 20 ℃ SF 80 ℃
Power (μW) 97 83 88 94 100 107 114 90 96 103 92 98 104
GBWb (MHz) 74.9 66.4 61.6 52.2 108.4 99.1 73.7 82.0 74.9 56.5 82.8 76.7 64.9
LF open loop gain (dB) 82.5 86.6 84.7 76.6 85.2 81.1 68.9 86.3 82.3 70.3 85.9 83.9 75.0
Phase margin (deg) 78.7 81.5 83.9 85.7 68.7 69.3 68.5 77.6 78.7 78.5 77.7 78.9 79.4
Gain margin (dB) 13.7 12.9 13.0 14.0 13.6 14.7 21.3 12.8 13.6 18.1 13.0 13.5 15.3
Show more
a Corners are defined as typical (T), slow (S), and fast (F). The first character corresponds to NMOS, and the second one to PMOS transistors.

The basic parameters of the complete preamplifier, including the BLR circuit (Fig. 3), are summarized in Table 2. The transimpedance gain combines the current-to-voltage conversion factor and the voltage gain obtained by transient simulations for a conventional SiPM input signal. Most of the performance parameters are within the specifications for different corners; however, significant variations in power consumption due to process variations can be observed. This is mostly related to variations in the bandgap reference voltage. However, the I2C interface of the ASIC allows the tuning of the bandgap reference output voltage and controls the bias current of each analog processing block to compensate for these variations if needed.

Table 2
Simulation results corresponding to the main preamplifier performance parameters for different process and temperature corners
Parameter TT 27 ℃ SS -20 ℃ SS 20 ℃ SS 80 ℃ FF -20 ℃ FF 20 ℃ FF 80 ℃ FS -20 ℃ FS 20 ℃ FS 80 ℃ SF -20 ℃ SF 20 ℃ SF 80 ℃
Power (μW) 115 74 81 95 148 167 195 96 106 122 108 123 146
Bandwidtha (MHz) 9.6 7.9 7.2 6.1 15.9 14.6 12.5 10.6 9.7 8.5 10.7 9.6 8.2
Voltage gaina (dB) 22.7 22.2 22.1 22.1 23.5 23.4 23.4 22.7 22.6 22.6 22.7 22.7 22.7
Transimpedance gainb (kΩ) 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.8
Input impedancecd (Ω) 270 307 334 375 184 201 228 248 271 304 243 263 299
end (nVHz) 18.3 18.3 19.8 22.3 15.0 16.3 18.6 17.2 18.6 21.0 15.9 17.3 20.0
ine (pAHz) 7.4 7.2 7.8 8.6 6.4 7.0 7.8 7.0 7.5 8.4 6.5 7.0 8.0
Show more
a Bandwidth and low frequency closed loop voltage gain of the preamplifier from AC simulation.

The SiPM signal is AC-coupled to the preamplifier; hence, baseline fluctuations must be considered. Two baseline control methods are used. The first is a BLR circuit: A switch is activated after the conversion, and the feedback capacitor is discharged for a fast return to baseline after the conversion is performed. The second method involves bipolar shaping. The input capacitor of the preamplifier produces an undershoot (zero in the frequency response), whose level could be tuned using the pseudoresistor bias current, as depicted in Fig. 5. The larger the undershoot, the faster the return to baseline.

Fig. 5
(Color online) Normalized preamplifier response as a function of Rf value (left) and zoomed inmage of the baseline return (right). Note that the signal polarity is negative and the undershoot polarity is positive. Simulation results for a conventional corner at 27 ℃
pic
2.3
Shaping

As already described, the shaper is divided into two blocks: The first block consists of an LPF with an adjustable time constant for each of the HG and LG preamplifiers. The LPF slows down the signal to allow the digital circuitry to select between the HG and LG signal paths using an analog switch. The selected signal path is followed by a second shaping block consisting of a second-order LPF implemented using a Sallen-Key topology (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
(Color online) Top: Sallen-Key filter for shaper implementation. Bottom: Normalized shaper response for different peaking times. Simulation results for a conventional corner at 27 ℃
pic

Thus, the block filter and signal bandwidth both contribute to optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio. The peak time of each shaper can be tuned from 150 ns to 1.5 us in steps of 70 ns, as shown in Fig. 6. The nominal peak time was approximately 1 μs.

The basic parameters of the shaper are summarized in Table 3. The process variations mostly affect the shaper time constant (related to the bandwidth and peaking time); however, the shaper capacitors (C1 and C2 in Fig. 6) can be tuned to compensate for these variations. The transimpedance gain is defined as the ratio of the peak output voltage of the shaper to the preamplifier input peak current; hence, it defines the gain of the complete analog signal-processing chain. This was obtained through a transient simulation using a conventional SiPM input signal. The equivalent noise input current (ENI) is computed as the ratio of the integrated noise at the output of the shaper to the transimpedance gain. With current-sensitive preamplifiers, electronic noise is referred to as the input current, similar to the equivalent noise charge (ENC) for charge preamplifiers, and is usually expressed in nA rms.

Table 3
Simulation results corresponding to the main shaper performance parameters for different process and temperature corners
Parameter TT 27 ℃ SS -20 ℃ SS 20 ℃ SS 80 ℃ FF -20 ℃ FF 20 ℃ FF 80 ℃ FS -20 ℃ FS 20 ℃ FS 80 ℃ SF -20 ℃ SF 20 ℃ SF 80 ℃
Powera (μW) 124 80 87 101 170 192 229 105 116 134 122 138 165
Bandwidthb (kHz) 322 226 228 229 482 486 487 320 322 321 318 321 323
Voltage gainb (dB) 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9
Transimpedance gainc (kΩ) 2.7 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.5 2.7 2.9
Peaking time (μs) 0.90 1.17 1.26 1.24 0.63 0.62 0.63 0.91 0.91 0.89 0.85 0.86 0.90
Output noised (μV rms) 542 449 488 547 562 611 685 499 542 622 488 531 597
ENIe (nA rms) 201 202 207 215 222 229 239 195 199 214 194 200 207
Show more
a Includes HG filter and shaper power consumption
2.4
Dynamic Range

The shaper peak output voltage and corresponding linearity error from a transient simulation as a function of the input peak current are depicted in Fig. 7. For signals below 200 μA, the HG is selected using an automatic path selection system. When the peak amplitude at the output of HG is higher than the threshold set in the path-selection comparator, the system switches to LG. The response is linear for input-peak currents up to 10 mA. The gain, which corresponds to the slope of the linear sections of the HG and LG, is depicted in Fig. 7, and the switching point between HG and LG can be programmed.

Fig. 7
Shaper peak output voltage and corresponding linearity error as a function of input peak current from transient simulations. The input signal shape follows the typical shape of the single cell signal of the S13552-10 SiPM and is linearly scaled to reach a 10 mA input-peak current
pic

The dynamic range is defined as the ratio of the largest and smallest values that a certain quantity can assume. As discussed previously, the largest signal that can be processed is at least 10 mA (the input peak current). The smallest detectable value is usually related to the noise floor, which corresponds to the ENI here. According to Table 3 the ENI is approximately 200 nA rms. Hence, the dynamic range of the system was approximately 50,000 A/A or 15.6 bits.

2.5
Acquisition and Digitization

The peak amplitude of the shaper is captured using a flip-around T&H circuit based on the bottom-plate sampling method [16]. The advantage of this technique is that it reduces the effect of charge injection and provides better linearity.

The digitization is based on the Wilkinson ADC architecture controlled by a finite-state machine (FSM), as shown in Fig. 8. The system lies in a steady state until either an internal or external trigger (“FrameSync" signal in Fig. 2) occurs. Figure 9 (top) shows a timing diagram describing the operation of the ASIC in the external trigger mode. After the trigger signal arrives, the system waits for a given number of clock cycles (programmable), during which the shaped analog peak is expected to occur. After this period, T&H is set to hold, such that the output remains constant. Simultaneously, a linear ramp generator (common to all channels) starts charging its internal capacitor and generates a VRAMP signal. The ramp duration is adjusted to approximately 40 μs to reach the full-scale voltage. During this period, the latched comparator transitions from low to high when the ramp overpasses the hold signal of T&H; the higher the voltage, the later the transition.

Fig. 8
Wilkinson ADC block diagram
pic
Fig. 9
(Color online) Top: Timing diagram for data conversion in external trigger mode, representing analog processing, digitization and transmission. Bottom: Timing diagram of the Wilkinson ADC operation
pic

In parallel, a binary counter counts the number of clock cycles that occur from the start of conversion (SoC) until the ramp crosses the signal level stored in T&H. The SoC signal is connected to the counter and generated by a comparator connected to the VRAMP signal with a threshold set slightly above the baseline level of the ramp. This provides a fixed starting point for the ADC counter. Thus, a well-defined pedestal signal (corresponding to the T&H output quiescent DC level with no input signal) is generated, as shown in Fig. 9 (bottom). The pedestal is subsequently removed. Pedestal subtraction eliminates errors owing to different variations in the DC level between channels. An end of conversion (EoC) signal is generated based on an additional comparator with a threshold VFS, which sets the full-scale (FS) range of the ADC. The converted value VFS can be acquired for calibration. The EoC signal uses the FSM to rearm the ADC logic.

With a 50 MHz clock and a ramp time of 40 μs, the Wilkinson ADC achieves a 12-bit resolution, where the most significant bit (MSB) is given by the path selection comparator and 11 bits are given by the latched value of the counter. Considering the conversion and serialization times, the maximum event rate is approximately 10 kHz. Data were serialized and transmitted with a differential scalable low-voltage signaling (SLVS) driver, and analog electronics were rearranged for the next conversion.

Radiation-tolerant techniques have been used to prevent errors originating from single-event effects (SEEs). Layout techniques were applied to minimize the single-event latch-up probability. Triple-modular redundancy was applied to the configuration registers and state machines to prevent single-event upsets. The I2C interface is implemented using a synchronous state machine to prevent the occurrence of errors from single-event transients.

3

Materials and methods

We developed a BETA measurement kit available upon request, which is almost plug-and-play and can be used to easily configure the ASIC and exploit its functionalities. It consists of two printed circuit boards (PCBs): a B-HER board and a B-MAX board. Figure 10 shows the BETA measurement kit for BETA-16 (a 16-channel version of BETA).

Fig. 10
(Color online) Top: BETA measurement kit, which consists of a B-HER board that holds the BETA ASICs. Bottom: B-MAX FPGA mother-board
pic

The B-HER board can hold up to four ASICs and has dedicated connectors to plug into the SiPM arrays. An additional pin input allows for the connection of a single SiPM. Finally, the user can inject an electric signal through a dedicated input (SMA connector-type). The board also includes a test buffer that allows the monitoring of the analog response of the different processing stages in all channels from one of the ASICs.

The B-MAX board contains field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) that are used to control and configure the ASIC. It can be connected via USB to a PC, where the user can control via software the different registers of the ASIC, launch acquisitions, and receive digitized data.

Among the several functionalities that the ASIC offers, the user can configure the gain of the preamplifiers and shaper, the individual channel thresholds, and work with different trigger modes: internal, external, triggered by the FPGA clock, or coincidence triggers of two or more ASICs. The user can also adjust the threshold of the automatic path selection, which determines whether the HG or LG path will be digitized, or even override this path selection, forcing one of the two gains.

3.1
Linearity of the energy measurement

A linearity test was performed using an electrical pulse injected directly into the BETA ASIC, as shown in Fig. 11. An arbitrary waveform generator (Agilent 33250A 80 MHz) emulating the SiPM signal response sent the pulse to a programmable attenuator (Agilent 11713B). Thus, a wide range of attenuation factors can be swept to study the behavior of the ASIC with several signal amplitudes and, therefore, different input currents. The energy (charge) measurement can be performed using either the standard digitization path (on-chip ADC) or, for characterization, by reading the output signal of any internal analog block with an oscilloscope using the on-chip analog output buffer. For debugging purposes, the linearity and pulse shape of the internal stages (preamplifier, shaper, and T&H) were studied using a Keysight MSOX3094T 350 MHz oscilloscope (5 GS/s).

Fig. 11
(Color online) Schematic representation of the experimental setup used to evaluate the linearity of the energy measurement
pic
3.2
Measurements with SiPM sensors

The setup used to perform low light level measurements is shown in Fig. 12. The BETA measurement kit and the SiPMs were placed in a dark box. This was used to evaluate the single photoelectron response, charge resolution, and timing resolution. An external trigger generator sends a signal to both the laser driver and oscilloscope. The laser driver (picosecond laser diode system ‘PiL040X’ from Advanced Laser Diode Systems A.L.S. GmbH) generates a pulse at 405 nm that, according to the specifications, has a width < 45 ps FWHM. The laser flashes pass through a single-mode fiber (Thorlabs 305A-FC SM) towards a beam collimator. The fiber is coupled to a Thorlabs liquid-crystal optical beam attenuator, which can change the attenuation factor depending on the applied voltage (from 0 V to 5 V, minimum to maximum attenuation, respectively). Finally, the beam pulse arrives at the Thorlabs N-BK7 ground-glass diffuser and spreads the light homogeneously over the sensor.

Fig. 12
(Color online) Schematic representation of the experimental setup using the blue laser source for SiPM and SPTR measurements
pic
3.3
Signal-to-Noise Ratio

To evaluate the SNR performance, the laser intensity was adjusted to obtain the mean detected flux of a few photons. We acquired a SiPM signal digitized with BETA and generated histograms with the collected charge to obtain the characteristic few-photoelectron spectra of SiPMs. The SNR was evaluated as μ1μ0σ0, where μ1 and μ0 are the positions of the first photoelectron and pedestal peaks, respectively, and σ0 is the standard deviation of the pedestal. The pedestal represents the signal acquired in the absence of an event and therefore captures the level of electronic noise.

3.4
Timing performance

The timing performance was evaluated by calculating the single-photon time resolution (SPTR) and generalizing the ’N-photons’ time resolution (NPTR). For these measurements, we adjusted the laser intensities to achieve fluxes of a few photons in the detector plane. Data were acquired using an Agilent MSO 9404A 4 GHz oscilloscope (20 GS/s). More specifically, the laser trigger and trigger signal generated by the BETA leading-edge trigger comparator output signal, which defines a time stamp, were captured. The delay distribution between the trigger and SiPM signal timestamps was used to compute the timing resolution. The number of photons is obtained based on the width of the trigger signal from the BETA ASIC, which follows a nonlinear behavior with respect to the number of photons or the amplitude of the pulse. By applying proper cuts to the width of the signal, it is possible to identify events with different numbers of detected photons. Each delay distribution corresponding to the events of a selected number of photons was fitted with either a Gaussian function or a combination of Gaussian and exponential distributions, where the FWHM value of the fitted distribution corresponded to the SPTR (or NPTR) in FWHM.

4

Characterization results

4.1
Evaluation of the BETA ASIC in the laboratory

We evaluated the performance of the BETA ASIC using the measurement kit described in Sect. 3. We tested the proposed system using different SiPMs. The main generic performance parameters of BETA ASIC are summarized in Table 4. The BETA ASIC not only fulfills the initial requirements imposed by the HERD mission but also has a large dynamic range and low power consumption, making the ASIC suitable for most space applications. The power consumption is expected to be less than 1 mW/channel in the 64-channel version of the ASIC (BETA-64). The 16-channel version of the chip (BETA-16) includes an output driver per channel with a power consumption of 400 μW/channel, which is absent in the 64-channel version of the chip.

Table 4
Summary of the main performance parameters of the BETA ASIC
Number of channels 16a/64b
Power consumption 1.4 mW/channela/1 mW/channelb
Preamplifier gain (HG path) 6 – 70
Preamplifier gain (LG path) 0.25 – 3.75
SNR (single-phec) > 5
Max. signal range ~10 mA peakc
Linearity error (full range) < 2%
Maximum operation rate 10 kHz
Show more
aBETA-16 and bBETA-64

The linearity and dynamic range of the BETA ASIC were evaluated using the setup shown in Fig. 11. The linearity at different internal processing stages (preamplifier, LPF, shaper, and T&H) was evaluated using different path selection configurations: path selection fixed to HG, path selection fixed to LG, or automatic path selection. As shown in Fig. 13, the linearity error was less than 3% with no correction for the on-chip analog output buffer and acquisition (probes and oscilloscope) nonlinearity. The switching point from HG to LG was clearly observed in automatic path-selection mode.

Fig. 13
(Color online) Linearity of BETA internal stages for different configurations of path selection control: HG (top left), LG (top right), and automatic (bottom left). The linearity error is also shown (bottom right)
pic

Linearity measurements based on the BETA on-chip ADC were performed. The results are shown in Fig. 14 for different configurations of HG and LG. The linearity error is also shown. Notably, it is equal to or less than the error obtained from previous measurements based on an oscilloscope (see Fig. 13). The linearity error was less than 2% below the saturation of each gain configuration. For the lowest-gain configuration of the LG path, a range of 13 mA input peak currents can be achieved without saturation. The linearity error in Fig. 13 is higher because these measurements include two additional elements: the oscilloscope and the analog output buffer of the chip, which must drive large capacitive loads (capacitance from the output pads and PCB traces and components). The nonlinearity of these elements is not corrected and can be important, particularly because of the slew-rate limitation of the analog output buffer. Conversely, this buffer is not required for measurements based on the internal ADC, as shown in Fig. 14. In standard data acquisition, an on-chip ADC is used, and an analog output buffer is not required. It is only used for characterization or debugging.

Fig. 14
(Color online) Linearity measurements of the BETA ASIC full chain, including ADC, for different configurations. Top: HG path. Bottom: LG path
pic

Figure 15 shows the charge spectra obtained in a single ASIC used to read out 16 of the 128 SiPMs of one of the Hamamatsu S13552-10 custom-made arrays equipped with the FIT modules. As mentioned above, each channel of the array has 3749 (23 × 163) microcells of 10 μm [2]. This array, with its small microcell size, is optimized to achieve a large dynamic range in a few mm2. Although SiPMs with small microcells have a lower gain than those with larger microcells, with this array, we can achieve an SNR of ~5 at the single-phe level. As shown in the plot, this SNR is sufficient to clearly identify at least the first ten phe peaks. These values were obtained using the nominal gain of the BETA preamplifiers: ~10 for the HG path and ~0.45 for the LG path. A higher SNR can be achieved using a higher-gain configuration at the expense of a lower dynamic range of the HG path.

Fig. 15
Single-phe spectra recorded in 1 channel of the Hamamatsu S13552-10 array that were exposed to laser pulses
pic

The BETA chip was also characterized using a single Hamamatsu S13360-1350CS SiPM (with an area of ~1.3 mm ×~1.3 mm). With a 50 μm microcell size, this SiPM has an intrinsically higher gain than that used for the FIT; thus, we could achieve an SNR of ~10 using the nominal gain of BETA. Figure 16 shows the single-phe spectrum obtained using this sensor. To produce this plot, we intentionally varied the intensity of the laser during the acquisition and overrode the path selection, forcing the HG path to show that using the ASIC enables the identification of peaks corresponding to events of 1 to above 20 phes.

Fig. 16
Single-phe spectrum recorded with a S13360-1350CS SiPM. The intensity of the laser was modified during the acquisition to obtain pulses from 1 to above 20 phe
pic

Even if the ASIC is not designed for fast-timing applications, the time resolution of the system (SiPM + ASIC) can be studied using the trigger signal, which is the OR of the trigger signal from the 16 channels. The output is a binary pulse, where the information of the arrival time of the signal is encoded in its rising edge, and its width is related (nonlinearly) to the amplitude of the signal. As shown in the top panel of Fig. 17, the number of phes recorded in an event can be identified by plotting the arrival time of the trigger signal (the delay with respect to the trigger given by the laser) versus its width. Using this information, we evaluated the time resolution of the system for input signals with different light intensities. With the S13360-1350CS SiPM, the time resolution for signals above 10 phe was below the 400 ps FWHM.

Fig. 17
(Color online) Top: Arrival time (delay) versus width of the BETA trigger signal. Center: Width distribution of the trigger signal for events over 3 phes. Bottom: Arrival time distribution for events of 10 phes. The arrival time distribution has been fitted by two different methods: using a Gaussian (red) and the combination of Gaussian and exponential functions (green)
pic

The important parameters for trigger applications are the trigger signal propagation delay and walking time. These parameters are evaluated using an electrical injection setup to measure the absolute delay introduced by the BETA ASIC. The results are depicted in Fig. 18, which shows that the trigger-signal delay is less than 30 ns for a single-photon signal. Typically, the trigger is set to a higher level, above 3 phes, where the delay is less than 20 ns and the time walk with respect to events with a larger number of detected photons is below 5 ns.

Fig. 18
Trigger signal delay (pink) as a function input signal level. The HG preamplifier output amplitude is also shown (red). Comparator trigger threshold is set to 0.5 photon signal level
pic
4.2
Evaluation of the BETA ASIC for the FIT detector in the SPS test beam area at CERN.

The HERD BETA measurement kit was placed in the test beam area at CERN to test the behavior of the ASIC for the FIT detector. An S13552-10 SiPM array with 64 channels, coupled to a fiber mat, was read using four BETA chips, as shown in Fig. 19. The fibers were manufactured by Kuraray3 (type: SCSF-78MJ) and had an average diameter of 250 m [2].

Fig. 19
(Color online) Top: HERD BETA measurement kit connected to a fiber mat in a test beam area at CERN. Bottom: Connection of the measurement kit to the SiPMs by using a flexible cable
pic

A 20 GeV proton beam was used, and only 2–3 fibers were hit per event. The ASIC was configured in the external trigger mode, and the trigger was provided by another HERD subsystem, in this case, the PSD. Data were acquired with BETA ASICs using the ADC output and processed externally on a computer.

Figure 20 shows the single-phe spectra of ADC acquisition when summing the data from all 16 channels in a BETA ASIC after pedestal calibration. The pedestal was initially measured in the absence of a signal to calibrate the DC variations between different channels and then subtracted before summing the responses of all channels in an ASIC. Pedestal events were removed to better illustrate the photon-peak distribution. The system was configured in the external trigger mode, and several events were recorded without a signal because of the efficiency of the system and the alignment of the fiber mat with respect to the beam. For this measurement, we manually acquired all data using the HG path.

Fig. 20
Single-phe spectra corresponding to the summation of the 16 channels after pedestal calibration. Zoomed image showing events from the second photon are highlighted. No event selection based on coincidences is performed
pic

As shown in Fig. 20, different numbers of photons are clearly identified. Notably, ASIC readout channels behave homogeneously even though the gain of the SiPMs has not been equalized. The mean ADC value measured for each photon (mean obtained by performing a Gaussian fit of the spectra) is shown in Fig. 21. As shown, the linearity error was below 2% for the entire dynamic range of the HG path. The measured SNR was approximately 6.4, indicating good detection sensitivity.

Fig. 21
Mean ADC value detected for each photon and linearity error.
pic
5

Conclusions and outlook

In this study, we describe the key characteristics of the BETA ASIC and evaluate its performance with electrical pulse injection and two different sensors from Hamamatsu: the S13552-10 array developed for FIT and a commercial S13360-1350CS single SiPM.

The experimental results proved that BETA ASIC presents a large dynamic range from ≈ 0.1 phe to ≈ 4000 pe, with a low power consumption of 1.4 mW/channel in the 16-channel version. A power consumption below 1 mW/channel was predicted for the 64-channel version. Experimental measurements for Hamamatsu SiPM S13360-3050CS showed a time resolution of 400 ps FWHM for 10 phe signals, a propagation delay below 20 ns, and a time walk below 5 ns.

The first prototype of BETA [17] was developed for the HERD FIT readout; however, after adding additional trigger and readout functionalities, it evolved into a versatile Front-End ASIC suitable for SiPM readout in multiple space and low event rate (10 kHz) applications: trigger and veto systems, charge measurement, calorimetry, photon counting, and time-of-flight counters with moderate timing resolution. Indeed, beyond the HERD experiment, it will be used to develop a new version of the radiation monitor for the LISA missions [18] and is considered for different missions such as NUSES [19] and drone applications such as radiation monitoring.

The fact that BETA provides full signal processing, including digitization, with a power consumption of only 1 mW/channel may significantly simplify front-end systems, such as those proposed for various space missions [20] and CubeSats [21].

References
1. P.W. Cattaneo,

The space station based detector HERD: precise high energy cosmic rays physics and multimessenger astronomy

. Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 306-308, 85-91 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2019.07.013
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. C. Perrina, G. Ambrosi, P. Azzarelloet al.,

The tracking system of HERD

. Proceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021) 395, 067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22323/1.358.0122
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. F. Gargano,

The high energy cosmic-radiation detection (HERD) facility on board the Chinese Space Station: Hunting for high-energy cosmic rays

. Proceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021) 395, 026 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22323/1.395.0026
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. D. Kyratzis, F. Alemanno, C. Altomareet al.,

The plastic scintillator detector of the HERD space mission

. Proceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021) 395, 054 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22323/1.395.0054
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. L. Gruber,

LHCb SciFi — Upgrading LHCb with a scintillating fibre tracker

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 958, 162025 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2019.03.080
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6.

Hamamatsu Photonics, S13552. Surface mount type one-dimensional 128-element MPPC array

. Product Datasheet, (2022). https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/ssd/s13552_kapd1083e.pdf Online version
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. M. Casolino, G. Cambie, L. Marcelliet al.,

SiPM development for space-borne and ground detectors: From Lazio-Sirad and Mini-EUSO to Lanfos

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 986, 164649 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164649
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. D. Gascon, H. Chanal, A. Comernaet al.,

PACIFIC: A 64-channel ASIC for scintillating fiber tracking in LHCb upgrade

. J. Instrum. 10, C04030 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/10/04/c04030
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. A. Ulyanov, D. Murphy, A. Fredriksenet al.,

Using the SIPHRA ASIC with an SiPM array and scintillators for gamma spectroscopy

. 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), Atlanta, GA, USA, 1-3(2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2017.8532845
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. J. Fleury, S. Callier, C. de La Tailleet al.,

Petiroc and Citiroc: Front-end ASICs for SiPM read-out and ToF applications

. J. Instrum. 9, C01049 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/9/01/C01049
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. S. Ahmad, P. Barrillon, S. Blin-Bondilet al.,

SPACIROC: A front-end readout ASIC for JEM-EUSO cosmic ray observatory

. Physics Procedia 37, 1600-1607 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.482
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12.

Weeroc, Read-out chips catalogue, V2.0

(2021). https://www.weeroc.com/my-weeroc/download-center/10-weeroc-roc-chip-catalogue/file
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. P.E. Allen and D.R. Holberg, MOS Analog Circuit Design. (Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 471
14. D. Djekic, G. Fantner, K. Lipset al.,

A 0.1% THD, 1-M Ω to 1-G Ω tunable, temperature-compensated transimpedance amplifier using a multi-element pseudo-resistor

. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 53, 1913-1923 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2018.2820701
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. R. Hogervorst, J.P. Tero, R.G.H. Eschauzieret al.,

A compact power-efficient 3 V CMOS rail-to-rail input/output operational amplifier for VLSI cell libraries

. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 29, 1505-1513 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1109/4.340424
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. X.B. Cai, D.L. Li, C. Zhanget al.,

A 12 bit 100 MS/s pipelined analog to digital converter without calibration

. J. Semicond. 31, 115007 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/31/11/115007
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. A. Sanmukh, S. Gomez, A. Comermaet al.,

Fiber tracker readout BETA ASIC for the high energy cosmic radiation detection (HERD) facility

. 2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1-3(2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/NSS/MIC44867.2021.9875752
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. D. Mazzanti, D. Guberman, A. Aranet al.,

A low-power SiPM-based radiation monitor for LISA

. Proceedings of 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021) 444, 1494 (2023). https://doi.org/10.22323/1.444.1494
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. I. De Mitri and M. Di Santo on behalf of the NUSES collaboration,

The NUSES space mission

. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2429, 1012007 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2429/1/012007
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. Q. Wan, J.H. Guom, X. Xuet al.,

Design of a high-dynamic-range prototype readout system for VLAST calorimeter

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 149 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01291-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. J.X. Wen, X.T. Zheng, J.D. Yuet al.,

Compact CubeSat Gamma-ray detector for GRID mission

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 99 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00937-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
Footnote

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.