logo

Quantifying the strength of magnetic fields using baryon electric charge correlation

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Quantifying the strength of magnetic fields using baryon electric charge correlation

Xu-Guang Huang
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.35, No.8Article number 138Published in print Aug 2024Available online 31 Jul 2024
57501

Although heavy-ion collisions generate strong magnetic fields, their direct measurement is a challenging task. A new observable, the baryon electric charge correlation, was recently found to be sensitive to the magnetic field strength and thus could be used as a magnetometer for heavy-ion collisions. Additionally, this observable may shed light on the equation of state and phase structure of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) under magnetic fields.

Determining and understanding the phase structure of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is important in contemporary physics [1]. Owing to the confinement property of QCD, QCD matter at low temperatures and baryon densities is in the confined hadronic phase. To explore the deconfined phases, relativistic heavy-ion colliders have been constructed, such as the relativistic heavy-ion collider (RHIC) and Large Hadron Collider (LHC). These colliders can accelerate ions to relativistic energies and then make them collide to generate deconfined QCD matter in which quarks and gluons are the fundamental degrees of freedom. Such matter is usually referred to as quark-gluon plasma (QGP). Furthermore, relativistic heavy-ion collisions can generate very strong magnetic fields [2-4] because the moving ions form two strong transient electric currents that induce a strong magnetic field along the reaction plane. Several interesting physical effects can be induced by a strong magnetic field including the well-known chiral magnetic effect (CME), which is the induction of an electric current along the direction of a magnetic field if the QGP contains net chirality [5, 6]. This intriguing effect is crucial for detecting the possible parity violations of QCD in hot environments. Over the past 15 years, experimental efforts from both RHIC and LHC have focused on searching for the CME [7-12]. Moreover, the strong magnetic field introduces new dimensions into the QCD phase diagram, prompting questions regarding the phase structure of QCD on the temperature and magnetic field plane or on the baryon density and magnetic field plane. In this aspect, the magnetic catalysis of chiral symmetry breaking at low temperatures and inverse magnetic catalysis at temperatures near the QCD crossover temperature are perhaps the most interesting phenomena. Thus, magnetic fields can help us enrich and deepen our understanding of QCD matter [13-15].

However, despite theoretical calculations elucidating the strength of magnetic fields at the moment of collision, the complicated temporal evolution of the magnetic fields in the QGP hinders the estimation of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions [16-20]. Hence, the availability of observables capable of detecting the strength of magnetic fields is invaluable. Recently, H.-T. Ding et al. [21] proposed that the baryon electric charge correlation could serve as an observable. Employing lattice QCD, the authors calculated various correlations among conserved charges, revealing that the baryon electric charge correlation, denoted as χ11BQ, is the most sensitive to the magnetic field, and thus can serve as a magnetometer for QCD.

The absence of a sign problem is notable in lattice QCD simulations conducted under strong magnetic fields. However, the necessity of discretizing the magnetic field using integer values of the magnetic flux limits the magnetic-field strength of the simulation. Specifically, the maximum achievable strength is constrained by the square of the inverse lattice spacing, whereas the minimum achievable strength is limited by the square of the inverse spatial lattice size. This study employed the largest magnetic flux of six, thereby making the discretization error associated with the magnetic field negligible. Furthermore, the analysis of the conserved charge fluctuations relies on continuum estimates derived from lattices with temporal sizes () of 8 and 12. The consistency between these continuum estimates for both χ11BQ and μQ/μB (the ratio of the electric and baryon chemical potentials) was established through additional lattice QCD calculations performed on = 16 lattices. Thus, the findings underscore the reliability of the continuum estimates based on = 8 and 12 lattices when applied to lattice QCD simulations in strong magnetic fields.

The fluctuations and correlations considered in this study are defined by χ2B=2(P/T4)μ^B2,χ2Q=2(P/T4)μ^Q2,χBQ=2(P/T4)μ^Bμ^Q, (1) evaluated at μB=μQ=0. Here, P denotes the total pressure of the system; T is the temperature; and μ^B,Q=μB,Q/T. These quantities are generally functions of eB. However, the lattice simulations showed that the correlation χ11BQ exhibited the highest sensitivity. The result of χ11BQ normalized by its value at zero magnetic field along the crossover transition line is shown in Fig. 1. The crossover temperature must be examined, because these fluctuations and correlations exhibit critical behavior, leading to a peak near the crossover temperature [22-24]. A strong dependence on eB is observed; as eB grows from zero to 0.15 GeV2, the ratio χ11BQ(eB)/χ11BQ(0) approximately doubles. The crossover temperature also depends on eB; however, this dependence is very weak when eB<0.15 GeV2, as shown in Fig. 2. The slowly decreasing behavior of Tpc versus eB is simply the inverse magnetic catalysis of the chiral phase transition which was discovered a decade ago in lattice simulations [25, 26].

Fig. 1
(Color online) The ratio χ11BQ(eB)/χ11BQ(0) at the crossover temperature. The result from the HRG model (dashed line) is also shown Ref. [21]
pic
Fig. 2
(Color online) Crossover temperature as a function of eB for eB0.16 GeV2 Ref. [21]
pic

Additionally, Fig. 1 presents the results from the hadron resonance gas (HRG) model, which explain the lattice data in the studied eB window. This demonstrates that the behavior of χ11BQ(eB)/χ11BQ(0) has a thermodynamic basis.

Several interesting consequences can arise from these results, as discussed in the following section.

First, a STAR Collaboration data analysis was recently performed primarily by a joint team of Fudan University, Brookhaven National Laboratory, University of California-Los Angles, and Institute of Modern Physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences, led by Jinhui Chen, Diyu Shen, Yu-Gang Ma, Aihong Tang, Gang Wang, Aditya Prasad Dash, Subhash Singha, and Dhananjaya Thakur. This analysis revealed a nontrivial sign change in the directed-flow splitting of charged hadrons, such as Δv1p=v1pv1p¯ and Δv1π=v1π+v1π, with increasing centrality [27, 28]. This strongly indicates the presence of magnetic fields. However, precisely extracting the strength of the magnetic field from v1 splitting remains challenging, owing to the complex dynamic evolution of the hot medium and the magnetic field itself. This challenge stems largely from the absence of a robust model describing the coupled spacetime evolution of the hot medium and magnetic field. Now, the correlation χ11BQ emerges as a complementary observable, which provides a model-independent approach to quantify the magnetic field strength. This is because χ11BQ can be solely determined from the final-state hadron spectra (although, naturally, this approach remains subject to considerations, such as kinematic acceptance and detector corrections).

Second, the results show that the fluctuations χ2B and χ2Q exhibit a weaker dependence on the magnetic field within the studied parameter region. This is somewhat surprising, as the electric charge fluctuation is expected to be sensitive to electromagnetic fields. However, this behavior can be understood by considering the HRG model, which yields similar trends around the crossover temperature. Additionally, some insights can be gained from the high-temperature limit, where the system should predominantly consist of massless free quarks (and free gluons that do not interact with magnetic fields). In this scenario, as eB approaches zero, it can be shown that χ2B=χ2Q/2=1/3 and χ11BQ=0. Thus, when eB is turned on but remains weak (compared with the temperature), χ11BQ becomes sensitive to eB [29, 30].

Third, an intriguing insight is provided in Fig. 2 of Ref. [21], which illustrates the contributors to χ2B, χ2Q, and χ11BQ. According to the HRG model, within the considered range of eB, the primary contribution to χ2Q stems from charged pions, whereas the largest contribution to χ2B originates from protons, although other hadrons also make significant contributions. However, in the case of χ11BQ, protons dominate at eB4mπ2, whereas doubly charged Δ(1232) baryons surpass protons at eB4mπ2. Because the proton contribution remains approximately constant with eB, the eB dependence of χ11BQ is primarily controlled by Δ(1232) baryons. This hinders the practical utilization of χ11BQ as a magnetometer in heavy-ion collisions, because Δ(1232) baryons are not directly measurable owing of their rapid decay into protons and pions. However, after accounting for such decays, the measurement of χ11BQ become quite reliable if a proxy for χ11BQ is constructed [21].

Finally, several interesting future directions were obtained. The lattice results for χ2B, χ2Q, and χ11BQ can be used to construct the equation of state of QCD matter under finite magnetic fields, small baryons, and electric chemical potentials. Higher-order fluctuations and correlations are necessary for determining a more precise equation of state or extending it to larger chemical potentials. Moreover, higher-order fluctuations and correlations are often considered as sensitive indicators of critical phenomena. Therefore, investigating the magnetic field dependence of these higher-order fluctuations and correlations near the crossover temperature is of considerable interest. Furthermore, the lattice results require the calculation of χ11BQ in other models that may complement the HRG model. Such studies can provide deeper insight into the magnetic field dependence of various fluctuations and correlations among conserved charges.

References
1. A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V. Koch, et al.,

Mapping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan

. Phys. Rept. 853, 1-87 (2020). arXiv: 1906.00936, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.01.005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. V. Skokov, A.Y. Illarionov, V. Toneev,

Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions

. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5925-5932 (2009). arXiv: 0907.1396, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X09047570
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. W.T. Deng, X.G. Huang,

Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012). arXiv: 1201.5108, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044907
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. J. Bloczynski, X.G. Huang, X. Zhang, et al.,

Azimuthally fluctuating magnetic field and its impacts on observables in heavy-ion collisions

. Phys. Lett. B 718, 1529-1535 (2013). arXiv: 1209.6594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.12.030
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. D.E. Kharzeev, L.D. McLerran, H.J. Warringa,

The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’

. Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227-253 (2008). arXiv: 0711.0950, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. K. Fukushima, D.E. Kharzeev, H.J. Warringa,

The Chiral Magnetic Effect

. Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008). arXiv: 0808.3382, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074033
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. K. Hattori, X.G. Huang,

Novel quantum phenomena induced by strong magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 26 (2017). arXiv: 1609.00747, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0178-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. Y.C. Liu, X.G. Huang,

Anomalous chiral transports and spin polarization in heavy-ion collisions

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 56 (2020). arXiv: 2003.12482, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00764-z
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. D.E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, P. Tribedy,

Chiral Magnetic Effect in Heavy Ion Collisions: The Present and Future

. arXiv:2405.05427
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. D.E. Kharzeev, J. Liao,

Chiral magnetic effect reveals the topology of gauge fields in heavy-ion collisions

. Nature Rev. Phys. 3, 55-63 (2021). arXiv: 2102.06623, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00254-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. X.L. Zhao, G.L. Ma, Y.G. Ma,

Electromagnetic field effects and anomalous chiral phenomena in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate and high energy

. Acta Phys. Sin. 72, 112502 (2023). https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.72.20230245
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. Q.Y. Shou, et al.,

Progress on the experimental search for the chiral magnetic effect, the chiral vortical effect, and the chiral magnetic wave

. Acta Phys. Sin. 72, 112504 (2023). https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.72.20230109
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. V.A. Miransky, I.A. Shovkovy,

Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals

. Phys. Rept. 576, 1-209 (2015). arXiv: 1503.00732, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.02.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. G. Cao,

Extremely strong magnetic field and QCD phase diagram

. Nucl. Tech. 46, 040003 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. H. Ding, S. Li, J. Liu,

Progress on QCD properties in strong magnetic fields from lattice QCD

. Nucl. Tech. 46, 040008 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040008
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. X.G. Huang,

Electromagnetic fields and anomalous transports in heavy-ion collisions — A pedagogical review

. Rept. Prog. Phys. 79, 076302 (2016). arXiv: 1509.04073, https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. L. Yan, X.G. Huang,

Dynamical evolution of a magnetic field in the preequilibrium quark-gluon plasma

. Phys. Rev. D 107, 094028 (2023). arXiv: 2104.00831, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.094028
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. J.J. Zhang, X.L. Sheng, S. Pu, et al.,

Charge-dependent directed flows in heavy-ion collisions by Boltzmann-Maxwell equations

. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033138 (2022). arXiv: 2201.06171, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033138
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. Z. Wang, J. Zhao, C. Greiner, et al.,

Incomplete electromagnetic response of hot QCD matter

. Phys. Rev. C 105, L041901 (2022). arXiv: 2110.14302, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L041901
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. H. Li, X.L. Xia, X.G. Huang, et al.,

Dynamic calculations of magnetic field and implications on spin polarization and spin alignment in heavy ion collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 108, 044902 (2023). arXiv: 2306.02829, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.044902
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. H.T. Ding, J.B. Gu, A. Kumar, et al.,

Baryon Electric Charge Correlation as a Magnetometer of QCD

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 201903 (2024). arXiv: 2312.08860, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.201903
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. Y. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Luo,

Experimental study of the QCD phase diagram in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Nucl. Tech. 46, 040001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. K. Xu, M. Huang,

QCD critical end point and baryon number fluctuation

. Nucl. Tech. 46, 040005 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. Q. Chen, G. Ma, J. Chen,

Transport model study of conserved charge fluctuations and QCD phase transition in heavy-ion collisions

. Nucl. Tech. 46, 040013 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.040013
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. G.S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, et al.,

QCD quark condensate in external magnetic fields

. Phys. Rev. D 86, 071502 (2012). arXiv: 1206.4205, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.071502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. G.S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, et al.,

The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields

. JHEP 02, 044 (2012). arXiv: 1111.4956, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2012)044
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. M.I. Abdulhamid, et al.,

Observation of the electromagnetic field effect via charge-dependent directed flow in heavy-ion collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011028 (2024). arXiv: 2304.03430, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011028
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. S. Chen,

Colossal Magnetic Field Detected in Nuclear Matter

. APS Physics 17, 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/Physics.17.31
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. A. Bazavov, et al.,

Fluctuations and Correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: A comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model

. Phys. Rev. D 86, 034509 (2012). arXiv: 1203.0784, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.034509
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30. H.T. Ding, S.T. Li, Q. Shi, et al.,

Fluctuations and correlations of net baryon number, electric charge and strangeness in a background magnetic field

. Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 202 (2021). arXiv: 2104.06843, https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00519-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar