logo

New quantification of symmetry energy from neutron skin thicknesses of 48Ca and 208Pb

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

New quantification of symmetry energy from neutron skin thicknesses of 48Ca and 208Pb

Rong An
Shuai Sun
Li-Gang Cao
Feng-Shou Zhang
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.35, No.10Article number 182Published in print Oct 2024Available online 28 Sep 2024
20902

Precise knowledge of the nuclear symmetry energy can be tentatively calibrated using multimessenger constraints. The neutron skin thickness of a heavy nucleus is one of the most sensitive indicators for probing the isovector components of effective interactions in asymmetric nuclear matter. Recent studies have suggested that the experimental data from the CREX and PREX2 collaborations are not mutually compatible with existing nuclear models. In this study, we review the quantification of the slope parameter of the symmetry energy L from the neutron skin thicknesses of 48Ca and 208Pb. Skyrme energy density functionals classified by various isoscalar incompressibility coefficients K were employed to evaluate the bulk properties of finite nuclei. The calculated results suggest that the slope parameter L deduced from 208Pb is sensitive to the compression modulus of symmetric nuclear matter, but not that from 48Ca. The effective parameter sets classified by K=220 MeV can provide an almost overlapping range of L from 48Ca and 208Pb.

Nuclear symmetry energyNeutron skin thicknessEnergy density functional
1

Introduction

Nuclear symmetry energy (NSE), which characterizes the energy cost of converting isospin-symmetric nuclear matter (SNM) into pure neutron matter (PNM), plays a vital role in determining the properties of finite nuclei and neutron stars [1-5]. The density dependence of the NSE, that is, Esym(ρ), can be expanded around the saturation density ρ0 (0.16 fm3). The slope parameter L determines the behavior of the equation of state (EoS) for asymmetric nuclear matter in the vicinity of ρ0. Precise knowledge of the density dependence of the NSE is difficult to obtain owing to the uncertainties arising from the varying model-dependent slope parameter L. Fortunately, the characteristic behaviors of the NSE can be extracted indirectly from both extensive terrestrial nuclear experiments and observed astrophysical events [6-12].

Nuclear symmetry energy has been extensively used to encode the implications of the degree of isospin asymmetry in finite nuclei. This is especially useful in the formation of the neutron skin thickness (NST) or neutron halo structures [13-15]. The quantity of NST, ΔRnp=rn2rp2, is defined as the difference between the root-mean-square (rms) radii of the neutrons and protons in a heavy nucleus and is strongly correlated to the slope parameter of the NSE, L [16-35]. Therefore, the NST of a heavy nucleus was measured to provide a constraint on the EoS of neutron-rich matter around ρ0.

The neutron radius of 208Pb has been determined in a laboratory by measuring the parity-violating asymmetry APV in polarized elastic electron scattering experiments such as PREX2 [36]. These efforts provided the latest value of NST with significantly improved precision: ΔRnp208=0.2120.354 fm. Moreover, a precise measurement of the NST for 48Ca was updated by the CREX group: ΔRnp48=0.0710.171 fm [37]. The reported NST of 48Ca is relatively thin compared to the measurement obtained by the high-resolution electric polarizability experiment (αD) in the RCNP collaboration (ΔRnp48=0.140.20 fm)[38]. In contrast, the NST of ΔRnp208 obtained by the PREX2 Collaboration is larger than that measured by RCNP (ΔRnp208=0.13500.181 fm) [39]. In Ref. [40], the NST of 208Pb obtained by constraining astrophysical observables favors smaller values; for example, ΔRnp208=0.17±0.04 fm. Likewise, the optimized new functionals obtained by calibrating the APV and αD values of 208Pb predict an NST of ΔRnp208=0.19±0.02 fm and symmetry-energy slope of L=54±8 MeV [41]. Recent theoretical studies have suggested that neutron star masses and radii are more sensitive to the NST of 208Pb than its dipole polarizability αD [42]. These results challenge our understanding of nuclear forces and energy density functionals (EDFs).

In Ref. [43], 207 EoSs were employed to explore the systematic correlations between ΔRnp48 and L(CREX) and between ΔRnp208 and L(PREX2). The slope parameter of the NSE obtained by fitting ΔRnp48 covers the interval range L(CREX)=050 MeV; however, the calibrated correlation between the slope parameter L and ΔRnp208 yields L(PREX2)=76∼165 MeV. As mentioned in the literature, there is no overlap between L(CREX) and L(PREX2) at the one-σ level. A combined analysis was also performed using a recent experimental determination of the parity-violating asymmetry in 48Ca and 208Pb [44]. The study demonstrated that the existing nuclear EDFs cannot simultaneously offer an accurate description of the skins of 48Ca and 208Pb. The same scenario can also be encountered in Bayesian analyses, where the predicted ΔRnp48 is close to the CREX result, but considerably underestimates the result of ΔRnp208 with respect to the PREX2 measurement [45]. Considering the isoscalar–isovector couplings in relativistic EDFs, the constraints from various high-density data cannot reconcile the recent results from the PREX2 and CREX collaboration measurements [46]. These investigations indicate that it is difficult to provide consistent constraints for the isovector components of the EoSs using existing nuclear EDFs, and further theoretical and experimental studies are urgently required [47].

To reduce the discrepancies between the different measurements and observations, an extra term controlling the dominant gradient correction to the local functional in the isoscalar sector has been used to weaken the correlations between the properties of the finite nuclei and the nuclear EoS [48]. As demonstrated in Ref. [49], the influence of the isoscalar sector is nonnegligible in the analysis. Nuclear matter properties expressed in terms of their isoscalar and isovector counterparts are correlated [50]. As noted above, existing discussions focus on the isovector components in the EDF models. Characteristic isoscalar quantities, such as the incompressibility of symmetric nuclear matter, are less considered when determining the slope parameter L [43]. The nuclear incompressibility can be deduced from measurements of the isoscalar giant monopole resonance (ISGMR) in medium-heavy nuclei [51, 52] and multi-fragmentations of heavy ion collisions [53]. The NSE obtained through the effective Skyrme EDF is related to the isoscalar and isovector effective masses, which are also indirectly related to the incompressibility of symmetric nuclear matter [54]. Although correlations between the incompressibility coefficients and isovector parameters are generally weaker than correlations between the slope parameter L and NSE [55], quantification uncertainty due to nuclear matter incompressibility is inevitable in the evaluation. Therefore, the influence of the isoscalar nuclear matter properties is essential for evaluating slope parameter L.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we briefly describe our theoretical model. In Sect. 3, we present the results and discussion. A short summary and outlook are provided in Sect. 4.

2

Theoretical framework

The sophisticated Skyrme EDF, expressed as an effective zero-range force between nucleons with density- and momentum-dependent terms, has been successful in describing various physical phenomena [56-65]. In this study, Skyrme-like effective interactions were calculated as follows [66, 67]: V(r1,r2)=t0(1+x0Pσ)δ(r)+12t1(1+x1Pσ)[P'2δ(r)+δ(r)P2]+t2(1+x2Pσ)P'δ(r)P+16t3(1+x3Pσ)[ρ(R)]αδ(r)+iW0σ[P'×δ(r)P], (1) where r=r1r2 and R=(r1+r2)/2 are related to the positions of two nucleons r1 and r2, P=(12)/2i is the relative momentum operator and P is its complex conjugate acting on the left, and Pσ=(1+σ1σ2)/2 is the spin exchange operator that controls the relative strength of the S=0 and S=1 channels for a given term in the two-body interactions, where σ1(2) are Pauli matrices. The final term denotes the spin-orbit force, where σ=σ1+σ2. Quantities α, ti, and xi (i=0–3) represent the effective interaction parameters of the Skyrme forces.

Generally, effective interaction parameter sets are calibrated by matching the properties of finite nuclei and nuclear matter at the saturation density. Notably, the Skyrme EDF can provide an analytical expression of all variables characterizing infinite nuclear matter (see [66-69] for details). The neutron skin of a heavy nucleus is regarded as a feasible indicator for probing isovector interactions in the EoS of asymmetric nuclear matter. Thus, the neutron and proton density distributions can be self-consistently calculated using Skyrme EDFs with various parameter sets. To clarify this, we further inspected the correlations between the slope parameter L and the NSTs of 48Ca and 208Pb. The bulk properties were calculated using standard Skyrme-type EDFs [51]. The corresponding effective interactions were in accord with the calculated nuclear matter properties, such as binding energy per nucleon E=ε/ρ, symmetry energy Esym(ρ)=182(ε/ρ)/ρ2|ρ=ρ0, slope parameter L=3ρ0Esym(ρ)/ρ|ρ=ρ0, and the incompressibility coefficient K=9ρ022(ε/ρ)/ρ2|ρ=ρ0. The value of the isoscalar incompressibility K from experimental data on giant monopole resonances covers a range of 230±10 MeV [70, 71]. In addition, the incompressibility of symmetric nuclear matter deduced from α-decay properties is K=241.28 MeV [72].

The nuclear breathing model exhibits a moderate correlation with the slope of the NSE and a strong dependence on the isoscalar incompressibility coefficient K of the symmetric nuclear matter [73]. The incompressibility of nuclear matter helps us understand the properties of neutron stars [74, 75]. Thus, it is essential to inspect the influence of isoscalar components on the slope parameter of the symmetry energy. To facilitate a quantitative discussion, a series of effective interaction sets classified by various nuclear incompressibility coefficients (K=220 MeV, 230 MeV, and 240 MeV) were employed, as shown in Table 1. Generally, analytical expressions at the saturation density ρ0 have specific forms [68]. Using these expressions, the density dependence of the symmetry energy can be expanded as a function of the neutron excess. Under the corresponding K, the slope parameter L and symmetry energy Esym at the saturation density ρ0 also cover a large range.

Table 1
Saturation properties with the different Skyrme parameter sets, such as symmetry energy Esym (MeV), the slope parameter L (MeV) and the nuclear matter incompressibility coefficient K (MeV) at saturation density ρ0 (fm-3) [51, 68].
K (MeV) Sets Esym (MeV) L (MeV)
  s2028 28 5.21
  s2030 30 12.20
  s2032 32 33.31
K =220 s2034 34 40.37
  s2036 36 58.82
  s2038 38 72.59
  s2040 40 83.22
  s3028 28 -11.23
  s3030 30 22.87
  s3032 32 36.22
K =230 s3034 34 56.14
  s3036 36 71.54
  s3038 38 87.62
  s3040 40 106.09
  s4028 28 3.98
  s4030 30 34.07
  s4032 32 34.43
K =240 s4034 34 62.59
  s4036 36 75.67
  s4038 38 98.65
  s4040 40 108.17
Show more
3

Results and Discussions

In Fig. 1, the NSTs of 48Ca and 208Pb are determined under various effective interactions. The chosen parameter sets were classified by different incompressibility coefficients of symmetric nuclear matter, for example, K=220 MeV, 230 MeV, and 240 MeV. The experimental constraint on the NST is indicated by a colored shadow. With increasing slope parameter L, the NST increases monotonically, and strong linear correlations between L and the NST of 48Ca and 208Pb are observed. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the linear correlations are similar, and the gradients for these four lines are in the range of 0.0008-0.0009.

Fig. 1
(Color online) Neutron skin thickness of 48Ca and 208Pb as a function of slope parameter L at saturation density ρ0. Experimental constraints are indicated by horizontal light-yellow (a) and blue (b) bands. The open markers represent Skyrme-EDF calculations classified by various incompressibility coefficients. The corresponding lines indicate theoretical linear fits
pic

Figure 1(b) shows the related linear correlations between ΔRnp(208Pb) and the slope parameters L for various nuclear matter incompressibility coefficients. However, with increasing incompressibility coefficient, the slopes of the fitted lines gradually decrease or a large deviation emerges at a high L. The nuclear matter EoS is conventionally defined as the binding energy per nucleon and can be expressed as a Taylor series expansion in terms of the isospin asymmetry. As suggested in Ref. [76, 73], the compression modulus of symmetric nuclear matter is sensitive to the density dependence of the NSE. With increasing neutron star mass, the correlation between K and its slope L increases [75]. From this figure, we can see that the isoscalar quantity of the incompressibility coefficient has a significant influence on the determination of the slope parameter L for 208Pb. However, for 48Ca this influence can be ignored.

Herein, we assume that the value of L is positive. Linear functions were fitted to the data classified by various nuclear matter incompressibility coefficients using the least-squares method. For K=220 MeV, we obtained the LΔRnp48 relationship as ΔRnp48=0.0009L+0.1155>0.1155 fm. (2) For LΔRnp208, the linear function K=220 MeV is expressed as ΔRnp208=0.0019L+0.0914 fm, (3) where a high correlation coefficient is located at R=0.99.

As suggested in Ref. [43], the slope parameter L (0-50 MeV) deduced from ΔRnp48 cannot overlap the interval range of the slope parameter L (76-165 MeV) deduced from ΔRnp208. To facilitate a quantitative comparison of the experiments with these theoretical calculations, the slope parameters L derived from the constraints of the NSTs of 48Ca and 208Pb are presented for various nuclear matter incompressibility coefficients in Table 2. Remarkably, the gaps between LΔRnp48 and LΔRnp208 increase with increasing incompressibility coefficients from K=220 MeV to 240 MeV.

Table 2
Slope parameters L derived from the NSTs of 48Ca and 208Pb are shown by the classified isoscalar incompressibility coefficients. The systematic uncertainties are presented in parenthesis.
K (MeV) LΔRnp48(MeV) LΔRnp208(MeV)
220 0-60.96 (3.08) 62.94-136.65 (1.70)
230 0-57.64 (2.87) 74.05-155.99 (1.64)
240 0-52.78 (2.54) 81.35-168.01 (1.33)
Show more

Nuclear matter properties consisting of isovector and isoscalar components are correlated with each other. Ref. [50] suggests that there is no clear correlation between the incompressibility K and NSE, and between the slope of the NSE and incompressibility K. The correlations between K and the isovector parameters are generally weaker than those between the NST and NSE coefficients [18, 55]. As seen in Fig. 1 (b), the increasing incompressibility coefficient K influences the determination of the covered range of the slope parameter L. Table 2 shows that the gap between LΔRnp48 and LΔRnp208 is smaller than the theoretical uncertainty when the nuclear incompressibility is K=220 MeV. This is instructive for calibrating new sets of Skyrme parameters for reproducing various nuclear matter properties as auxiliary conditions.

To facilitate the influence of the incompressibility coefficient on determining the slope parameter L, the “data-to-data” relationships between the NST of 208Pb and the incompressibility coefficients K are presented in Fig. 2. Here, the slope parameters of the NSE were chosen to be approximately L=34 MeV and L=73 MeV. From this figure, it can be seen that the NST of 208Pb decreases with increasing incompressibility coefficient. This further demonstrates that the isoscalar compression modulus should be appropriately considered in the calibration protocol.

Fig. 2
(Color online) Neutron skin thickness of 208Pb as a function of incompressibility coefficient K at saturation density ρ0
pic

In our calculations, the upper limits of L were gradually overestimated as the incompressibility coefficient K increased. Combined with the latest PREX2 experiment, the result extracted from the relativistic EDFs leads to a covered range of L = 106±37 MeV [77]. The induced slope parameter L is more consistent with that obtained when the incompressibility coefficient is K=220 MeV.

In Refs. [78-80], a highly linear correlation between the slope parameter L and the differences in the charge radii of mirror-partner nuclei ΔRch was demonstrated. The nuclear charge radius of 54Ni has been determined using collinear laser spectroscopy [81]. By combining the charge radii of the mirror-pair nuclei 54Fe, the deduced slope parameter covers the interval range 21 MeV ≤ L ≤ 88 MeV. A recent study suggested that the upper or lower limits of L may be constrained if precise data on the mirror charge radii of 44Cr-44Ca and 46Fe-46Ca are selected [82]. In all of these studies, isoscalar nuclear matter properties were not considered. In fact, the value deduced from the relativistic and non-relativistic Skyrme EDFs with identical incompressibility coefficients K=230 MeV gives a narrow range of 22.50 MeV ≤ L ≤ 51.55 MeV [83]. This is in agreement with the results in Ref. [84] where a soft EoS is obtained; for example, L≤60 MeV.

In atomic nuclei, the NST is regarded as a perfect signal for describing the isovector property, and is highly correlated with the slope parameter of the NSE. The difference in the charge radii of the mirror-pair nuclei and the slope of the NSE exhibit a highly linear relationship [85-87]. To facilitate the influence of the isoscalar properties on determining the EoS of nuclear matter, the data-to-data relations between the difference in charge radii ΔRch of the mirror-pair nuclei 54Ni-54Fe and the NSTs of 48Ca and 208Pb are shown in Fig. 3. Notably, highly linear correlations between ΔRch and the NSTs of 48Ca and 208Pb are observed.

Fig. 3
(Color online) ΔRch of the mirror-pair nuclei 54Ni-54Fe as a function of the neutron skin thicknesses of 48Ca (a) and 208Pb (b). The experimental constraints are shown as a horizontal light-blue band. The open markers are the results of Skyrme-EDF calculations. The corresponding lines indicate theoretical linear fits
pic

In Fig. 3 (a), the linear functions fit the experimental data well across various incompressibility coefficients K, that is, the slope parameter can be constrained concurrently through the calculated NST of 48Ca and the ΔRch of mirror-pair nuclei 54Ni-54Fe. However, as shown in Fig. 3 (b), the fitting lines deviate from the cross-over region between ΔRch and the NST of 208Pb except for K=220 MeV. Although the linear function captures a relatively narrow region, this further demonstrates the need to extract valid information about the nuclear EoS by considering the isoscalar components in the calibration procedure.

The Coulomb term does not contribute to infinite nuclear matter calculations, in which the NSE plays an essential role in determining the evolution of isospin-asymmetry components. However, in atomic nuclei, the actual proton and neutron density distributions are mostly dominated by the degree of isospin asymmetry and Coulombic forces. It is evident that the competition between the Coulomb interaction and the NSE is related to the stability of the dripline nuclei against nucleon emission [88, 89]. The NST is associated with the symmetry energy and significantly influenced by the NSE, which corresponds to the EoS of neutron-rich matter. Meanwhile, a strong linear correlation between the slope parameter L and the difference in the charge radii of the mirror-pair nuclei is evident [78-83]. As shown in Fig. 3, this highly linear correlation extends to the NST and the difference in the charge radii of the mirror-pair nuclei, owing to isospin-symmetry breaking [87].

4

Summary and outlook

As is well known, the Skyrme parameters can be characterized analytically by the isoscalar and isovector nuclear matter properties of the Hamiltonian density. More effective statistical methods have also been used to discuss the theoretical uncertainties [28, 90, 91]. In this study, we reviewed the influence of nuclear matter incompressibility on the determination of the slope parameter of the NSE L. The NSTs of 48Ca and 208Pb were calculated using Skyrme EDFs. The slope parameter L deduced from 208Pb is sensitive to the incompressibility coefficients, whereas that for 48Ca is not. A continuous range of L can be obtained if the nuclear matter is incompressible at K=220 MeV. This is in agreement with that in Ref. [55] where the nuclear matter incompressibility covers the interval range of K=2238+7 MeV. This implies that isoscalar components should be considered when determining the slope parameter L. In addition, it is desirable to review the influence of the incompressibility coefficient K on the determination of the slope parameter L within the framework of relativistic EDFs.

The nuclear symmetry energy can be obtained using different methods and models [92-107]. The precise determination of the slope parameter L is related to various quantities such as the charge-changing cross-section [108, 109], sub-barrier fusion cross-section, and astrophysical S-factor in asymmetric nuclei [110]. Generally, the proton and neutron density distributions are mutually determined by the isospin asymmetry and Coulombic force. The isospin-symmetry-breaking effect influences the determination of the charge density distributions [111-114]. Thus, more accurate descriptions of NST and charge radii are required. In addition, the curvature of the symmetry energy Ksym [76] and three-body interactions in the Skyrme forces [115] may also influence the determination of the neutron skin.

References
1. C.J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz,

Neutron star structure and the neutron radius of 208Pb

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5647 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5647
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. B.-A. Li, P.G. Krastev, D.-H. Wen et al.,

Towards understanding astrophysical effects of nuclear symmetry energy

. Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12780-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. A.W. Steiner, M. Prakash, J.M. Lattimer et al.,

Isospin asymmetry in nuclei and neutron stars

. Phys. Rept. 411, 325 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.02.004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. J.M. Lattimer and M. Prakash,

Neutron star observations: Prognosis for equation of state constraints

. Phys. Rept. 442, 109 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. J.F. Xu, C.J. Xia, Z.Y. Lu et al.,

Symmetry energy of strange quark matter and tidal deformability of strange quark stars

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 143 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-022-01130-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. B.-A. Li, L.-W. Chen, and C.M. Ko,

Recent progress and new challenges in isospin physics with heavy-ion reactions

. Phys. Rept. 464, 113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. B.-A. Li, A. Ramos, G. Verde et al.,

Topical issue on nuclear symmetry energy

. Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2014-14009-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. J.-N. Hu, S.-S. Bao, Y. Zhang et al.,

Effects of symmetry energy on the radius and tidal deformability of neutron stars in the relativistic mean-field model

. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 043D01 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptaa016
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. Z. Zhang and L.-W. Chen,

Constraining the density slope of nuclear symmetry energy at subsaturation densities using electric dipole polarizability in 208Pb

. Phys. Rev. C 90, 064317 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.064317
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. Y.-X. Zhang, M. Liu, and C.-J Xia et al.,

Constraints on the symmetry energy and its associated parameters from nuclei to neutron stars

. Phys. Rev. C 101, 034303 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. J. Liu, Z.-Z. Ren and C. Xu,

Combining the modified Skyrme-like model and the local density approximation to determine the symmetry energy of nuclear matter

. J. Phys. G 45, 075103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aac78f
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. S. Yang, R.-J. Li and C. Xu,

α clustering in nuclei and its impact on the nuclear symmetry energy

. Phys. Rev. C 108, L021303 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L021303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. J. Meng and P. Ring,

Relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov description of the neutron halo in 11Li

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3963 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3963
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. S.-G. Zhou, J. Meng, P. Ring et al.,

Neutron halo in deformed nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 82, 011301(R) (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.011301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. X.-N. Cao, K.-M. Ding, M. Shi et al.,

Exploration of the exotic structure in Ce isotopes by the relativistic point-coupling model combined with complex momentum representation

. Phys. Rev. C 102, 044313 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044313
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. B.A. Brown,

Neutron radii in nuclei and the neutron equation of state

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5296 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5296
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. S. Typel and B.A. Brown,

Neutron radii and the neutron equation of state in relativistic models

. Phys. Rev. C 64, 027302 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.64.027302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. S. Yoshida and H. Sagawa,

Neutron skin thickness and equation of state in asymmetric nuclear matter

. Phys. Rev. C 69, 024318 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.024318
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. L.-W. Chen, C.M. Ko, and B.-A. Li,

Nuclear matter symmetry energy and the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 72, 064309 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.72.064309
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. X. Roca-Maza, M. Centelles, X. Viñas et al.,

Neutron skin of 208Pb, nuclear symmetry energy, and the parity radius experiment

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 252501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.252501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. M. Warda, X. Viñas, X. Roca-Maza et al.,

Neutron skin thickness in the droplet model with surface width dependence: Indications of softness of the nuclear symmetry energy

. Phys. Rev. C 80, 024316 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.024316
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. M.K. Gaidarov, A. N. Antonov, P. Sarriguren et al.,

Surface properties of neutron-rich exotic nuclei: A source for studying the nuclear symmetry energy

. Phys. Rev. C 84, 034316 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.034316
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. M. Centelles, X. Roca-Maza, X. Viñas et al.,

Nuclear symmetry energy probed by neutron skin thickness of nuclei

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 122502 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.122502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz,

Information content of a new observable: The case of the nuclear neutron skin

. Phys. Rev. C 81, 051303(R) (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.051303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. B.K. Agrawal, J.N. De, and S.K. Samaddar,

Determining the density content of symmetry energy and neutron skin: An empirical approach

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 262501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.262501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. B.K. Agrawal, J.N. De, S.K. Samaddar et al.,

Constraining the density dependence of the symmetry energy from nuclear masses

. Phys. Rev. C 87, 051306(R) (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.051306
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. N. Wang, L. Ou, and M. Liu,

Nuclear symmetry energy from the Fermi-energy difference in nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 87, 034327 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034327
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz,

Nuclear charge and neutron radii and nuclear matter: Trend analysis in Skyrme density-functional-theory approach

. Phys. Rev. C 93, 051303(R) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.051303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. Z. Zhang and L.-W. Chen,

Constraining the symmetry energy at subsaturation densities using isotope binding energy difference and neutron skin thickness

. Phys. Lett. B 726, 234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30. J. Xu, W.-J. Xie, and B.-A. Li,

Bayesian inference of nuclear symmetry energy from measured and imagined neutron skin thickness in 116,118,120,122,124,130,132Sn, 208Pb, and 48Ca

. Phys. Rev. C 102, 044316 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044316
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31. J.M. Lattimer,

Constraints on nuclear symmetry energy parameters

. Particles 6, 30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/particles6010003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32. J.-M. Dong, W. Zuo and J.-Z. Gu,

Constraints on neutron skin thickness in 208Pb and density-dependent symmetry energy

. Phys. Rev. C 91, 034315 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.034315
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33. C. Xu, Z.-Z. Ren and J. Liu,

Attempt to link the neutron skin thickness of 208Pb with the symmetry energy through cluster radioactivity

. Phys. Rev. C 90, 064310 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.064310
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34. L.-W. Chen, C.M. Ko and B.-A. Li,

Constraining the Skyrme effective interactions and the neutron skin thickness of nuclei using isospin diffusion data from heavy ion collisions

. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 15, 13851395 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301306004946
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35. J.-M. Dong, L.-J. Wang, W. Zuo et al.,

Constraints on Coulomb energy, neutron skin thickness in 208Pb, and symmetry energy

. Phys. Rev. C 97, 034318 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034318
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36. D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic et al., (PREX Collaboration),

Accurate determination of the neutron skin thickness of 208Pb through parity-violation in electron scattering

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37. D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic et al., (CREX Collaboration),

Precision determination of the neutral weak form factor of 48Ca

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 042501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.042501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
38. J. Birkhan, M. Miorelli, S. Bacca et al.,

Electric dipole polarizability of 48Ca and implications for the neutron skin

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 252501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.252501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
39. A. Tamii, I. Poltoratska, P. von Neumann-Cosel et al.,

Complete electric dipole response and the neutron skin in 208Pb

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 062502 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.062502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
40. R. Essick, I. Tews, P. Landry et al.,

Astrophysical constraints on the symmetry energy and the neutron skin of 208Pb with minimal modeling assumptions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 192701 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.192701
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
41. P.-G. Reinhard, X. Roca-Maza, and W. Nazarewicz,

Information content of the parity-violating asymmetry in 208Pb

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 232501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.232501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
42. H. Sotani and T. Naito,

Empirical neutron star mass formula based on experimental observables

. Phys. Rev. C 107, 035802 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.035802
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
43. S. Tagami, T. Wakasa, and M. Yahiro,

Slope parameters determined from CREX and PREX2

. Res. Phys. 43, 106037 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.106037
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
44. P.-G. Reinhard, X. Roca-Maza, and W. Nazarewicz,

Combined theoretical analysis of the parity-violating asymmetry for 48Ca and 208Pb

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 232501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.232501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
45. Z. Zhang and L.-W. Chen,

Bayesian inference of the symmetry energy and the neutron skin in 48Ca and 208Pb from CREX and PREX-2

. Phys. Rev. C 108, 024317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024317
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
46. T. Miyatsu, M.-K. Cheoun, K. Kim et al.,

Can the PREX-2 and CREX results be understood by relativistic mean-field models with the astrophysical constraints

?. Phys. Lett. B 843, 138013 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138013
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
47. E. Yüksel and N. Paar,

Implications of parity-violating electron scattering experiments on 48Ca (CREX) and 208Pb (PREX-II) for nuclear energy density functionals

. Phys. Lett. B 836, 137622 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137622
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
48. C. Mondal and F. Gulminelli,

Nucleonic metamodeling in light of multimessenger, PREX-II, and CREX data

. Phys. Rev. C 107, 015801 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.015801
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
49. D. Chatterjee, F. Gulminelli, A. R. Raduta et al.,

Constraints on the nuclear equation of state from nuclear masses and radii in a Thomas-Fermi meta-modeling approach

. Phys. Rev. C 96, 065805 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.065805
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
50. S. Yoshida and H. Sagawa,

Isovector nuclear matter properties and neutron skin thickness

. Phys. Rev. C 73, 044320 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.044320
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
51. G. Colò, N.V. Giai, J. Meyer et al.,

Microscopic determination of the nuclear incompressibility within the nonrelativistic framework

. Phys. Rev. C 70, 024307 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.024307
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
52. L.-G. Cao, H. Sagawa, and G. Colò,

Microscopic study of the isoscalar giant monopole resonance in Cd, Sn, and Pb isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 86, 054313 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.054313
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
53. A. Ono, P. Danielewicz, W.A. Friedman et al.,

Symmetry energy for fragmentation in dynamical nuclear collisions

. Phys. Rev. C 70, 041604(R) (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.041604
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
54. L.-G. Cao, U. Lombardo, C.W. Shen et al.,

From Brueckner approach to Skyrme-type energy density functional

. Phys. Rev. C 73, 014313 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.014313
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
55. J. Xu, Z. Zhang, and B.-A. Li,

Bayesian uncertainty quantification for nuclear matter incompressibility

. Phys. Rev. C 104, 054324 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.054324
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
56. M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and P.-G. Reinhard,

Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
57. Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, J. Meng et al.,

Influence of pairing correlations on the radius of neutron-rich nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 95, 014316 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.014316
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
58. Y. Zhang and X.Y. Qu,

Effects of pairing correlation on the quasiparticle resonance in neutron-rich Ca isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 102, 054312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054312
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
59. J.C. Pei, G.I. Fann, R.J. Harrison et al.,

Adaptive multi-resolution 3D Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov solver for nuclear structure

. Phys. Rev. C 90, 024317 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024317
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
60. Q.Z. Chai, J.C. Pei, N. Fei et al.,

Constraints on the neutron drip line with the newly observed 39Na

. Phys. Rev. C 102, 014312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014312
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
61. Z.-J. Wu, L. Guo, Z. Liu et al.,

Production of proton-rich nuclei in the vicinity of 100Sn via multinucleon transfer reactions

. Phys. Lett. B 825, 136886 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136886
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
62. L.-G. Cao, H. Sagawa, and G. Colò,

Effects of tensor correlations on low-lying collective states in finite nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 83, 034324 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034324
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
63. P.-W. Wen, L.-G. Cao, J. Margueron et al.,

Spin-isospin response in finite nuclei from an extended Skyrme interaction

. Phys. Rev. C 89, 044311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.044311
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
64. E. Khan, N. Paar, D. Vretenar et al.,

Incompressibility of finite fermionic systems: Stable and exotic atomic nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 87, 064311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.064311
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
65. L.-G. Cao, S.-S. Zhang, and H. Sagawa,

Quenching factor of Gamow-Teller and spin dipole giant resonances

. Phys. Rev. C 100, 054324 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054324
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
66. E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel et al.,

A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities

. Nucl. Phys. A 627, 710 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00596-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
67. E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel et al.,

A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities Part II. Nuclei far from stabilities

. Nucl. Phys. A 635, 231 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00180-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
68. M. Dutra, O. Lourenço, J.S. Sá Martins et al.,

Skyrme interaction and nuclear matter constraints

. Phys. Rev. C 85, 035201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.035201
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
69. L.-W. Chen, C.M. Ko, B.-A. Li et al.,

Density slope of the nuclear symmetry energy from the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 82, 024321 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.024321
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
70. D.H. Youngblood, H.L. Clark, and Y.-W. Lui,

Incompressibility of nuclear matter from the giant monopole resonance

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 691 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.691
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
71. M. Uchida, H. Sakaguchi, M. Itoh et al.,

Systematics of the bimodal isoscalar giant dipole resonance

. Phys. Rev. C 69, 051301(R) (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.051301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
72. W.M. Seif,

α decay as a probe of nuclear incompressibility

. Phys. Rev. C 74, 034302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.034302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
73. L.-W. Chen and J.-Z. Gu,

Correlations between the nuclear breathing mode energy and properties of asymmetric nuclear matter

. J. Phys. G 39, 035104 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/39/3/035104
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
74. N. Alam, B.K. Agrawal, M. Fortin et al.,

Strong correlations of neutron star radii with the slopes of nuclear matter incompressibility and symmetry energy at saturation

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 052801(R) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.052801
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
75. A. Kumar, H.C. Das, and S.K. Patra,

Incompressibility and symmetry energy of a neutron star

. Phys. Rev. C 104, 055804 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.055804
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
76. J. Piekarewicz,

Unmasking the nuclear matter equation of state

. Phys. Rev. C 69, 041301(R) (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.041301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
77. B.T. Reed, F.J. Fattoyev, C.J. Horowitz et al.,

Implications of PREX-2 on the equation of state of neutron-rich matter

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172503
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
78. N. Wang and T. Li,

Shell and isospin effects in nuclear charge radii

. Phys. Rev. C 88, 011301(R) (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.011301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
79. B.A. Brown,

Mirror charge radii and the Neutron Equation of State

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 122502 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.122502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
80. B.A. Brown, K. Minamisono, J. Piekarewicz et al.,

Implications of the 36Ca-36S and 38Ca-38Ar difference in mirror charge radii on the neutron matter equation of state

. Phys. Rev. Research 2, 022035(R) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.022035
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
81. S.V. Pineda, K. König, D.M. Rossi et al.,

Charge radius of neutron-deficient 54Ni and symmetry energy constraints using the difference in mirror pair charge radii

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 182503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.182503
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
82. Y.N. Huang, Z.Z. Li, and Y.F. Niu,

Correlation between the difference of charge radii in mirror nuclei and the slope parameter of the symmetry energy

. Phys. Rev. C 107, 034319 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.034319
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
83. R. An, S. Sun, L.-G. Cao et al.,

Constraining nuclear symmetry energy with the charge radii of mirror-pair nuclei

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 119 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01269-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
84. K. König, J.C. Berengut, A. Borschevsky et al.,

Nuclear charge radii of silicon isotopes., (2023)

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 162502 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.162502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
85. J. Yang and J. Piekarewicz,

Difference in proton radii of mirror nuclei as a possible surrogate for the neutron skin

. Phys. Rev. C 97, 014314 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.014314
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
86. S.J. Novario, D. Lonardoni, S. Gandolfi et al.,

Trends of neutron skins and radii of mirror nuclei from first principles

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 032501 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.032501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
87. P. Bano, S.P. Pattnaik, M. Centelles et al.,

Correlations between charge radii differences of mirror nuclei and stellar observables

. Phys. Rev. C 108, 015802 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.015802
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
88. X. Roca-Maza and N. Paar,

Nuclear equation of state from ground and collective excited state properties of nuclei

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 101, 96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.04.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
89. K. Oyamatsu, K. Iida, and H. Koura,

Neutron drip line and the equation of state of nuclear matter

. Phys. Rev. C 82, 027301 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.027301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
90. L.E. Balliet, W.G. Newton, S. Cantu et al.,

Prior probability distributions of neutron star crust models

. Astrophys. J. 918, 79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac06a4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
91. P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz,

Information content of the differences in the charge radii of mirror nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 105, L021301 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L021301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
92. P. Giuliani, K. Godbey, E. Bonilla et al.,

Bayes goes fast: Uncertainty quantification for a covariant energy density functional emulated by the reduced basis method

. Front. Phys. 10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.1054524
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
93. R. Furnstahl,

Neutron radii in mean-field models

. Nucl. Phys. A 706, 85 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(02)00867-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
94. C. Mondal, B.K. Agrawal, M. Centelles et al.,

Model dependence of the neutron-skin thickness on the symmetry energy

. Phys. Rev. C 93, 064303 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.064303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
95. M. Gaidarov, I. Moumene, A. Antonov et al.,

Proton and neutron skins and symmetry energy of mirror nuclei

. Nucl. Phys. A 1004, 122061 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122061
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
96. S.-H. Cheng, J. Wen, L.-G. Cao et al.,

Neutron skin thickness of 90Zr and symmetry energy constrained by charge exchange spin-dipole excitations

. Chin. Phys. C 47, 024102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/aca38e
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
97. L.-G. Cao, X. Roca-Maza, G. Colò et al.,

Constraints on the neutron skin and symmetry energy from the anti-analog giant dipole resonance in 208Pb

. Phys. Rev. C 92, 034308 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034308
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
98. X. Roca-Maza, L.-G. Cao, G. Colò et al.,

Fully self-consistent study of charge-exchange resonances and the impact on the symmetry energy parameters

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 044313 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.044313
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
99. L.-G. Cao and Z.-Y. Ma,

Symmetry energy and isovector giant dipole resonance in finite nuclei

. Chin. Phys. Lett 25, 1625 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307x/25/5/028
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
100. L.-G. Cao and Z.-Y. Ma,

Soft dipole modes in neutron-rich Ni-isotopes in QRRPA

. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 2845 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732304015233
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
101. M. Liu, Z.-X. Li, N. Wang et al.,

Exploring nuclear symmetry energy with isospin dependence on neutron skin thickness of nuclei

. Chin. Phys. C 35, 629 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/35/7/006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
102. H. Yu, D.-Q. Fang, Y.-G. Ma,

Investigation of the symmetry energy of nuclear matter using isospin-dependent quantum molecular dynamics

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 61 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00766-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
103. S. Gautam, A. Venneti, S. Banik et al.,

Estimation of the slope of nuclear symmetry energy via charge radii of mirror nuclei

. Nucl. Phys. A 1043, 122832 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122832
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
104. D.-Q. Fang,

Neutron skin thickness and its effects in nuclear reactions

. Nucl. Tech. (in Chinese) 46, 155 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.080016
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
105. Z.-P. Gao and Q.-F. Li,

Studies on several problems in nuclear physics by using machine learning

. Nucl. Tech. (in Chinese) 46, 95 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.080009
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
106. J. Xu,

Constraining isovector nuclear interactions with giant dipole resonance and neutron skin in 208Pb from a Bayesian approach

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 042101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/38/4/042101
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
107. W.-B. He, Q.-F. Li, Y.-G. Ma et al.,

Machine learning in nuclear physics at low and intermediate energies

. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 282001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2116-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
108. J.-Y. Xu, Z.-Z. Li, B.-H. Sun et al.,

Constraining equation of state of nuclear matter by charge-changing cross section measurements of mirror nuclei

. Phys. Lett. B 833, 137333 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137333
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
109. J.-W. Zhao, B.-H. Sun, I. Tanihata et al.,

Isospin-dependence of the charge-changing cross-section shaped by the charged-particle evaporation process

. Phys. Lett. B 847, 138269 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138269
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
110. T. Ghosh, Sangeeta , G. Saxena et al.,

Neutron skin thickness dependence of astrophysical S-factor

. arXiv:2303.12156 [nucl-th], (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12156
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
111. J.-M. Dong, X.-L. Shang, W. Zuo et al.,

An effective Coulomb interaction in nuclear energy density functionals

. Nucl. Phys. A 983, 133 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.01.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
112. T. Naito, G. Colò, H.-Z. Liang et al.,

Toward ab initio charge symmetry breaking in nuclear energy density functionals

. Phys. Rev. C 105, L021304 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L021304
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
113. T. Naito, G. Colò, H.-Z. Liang et al.,

Effects of Coulomb and isospin symmetry breaking interactions on neutron-skin thickness

. Phys. Rev. C 107, 064302 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.064302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
114. C.-Y. Seng and M. Gorchtein,

Electroweak nuclear radii constrain the isospin breaking correction to Vud

. Phys. Lett. B 838, 137654 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137654
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
115. Z. Zhang and L.-W. Chen,

Extended Skyrme interactions for nuclear matter, finite nuclei, and neutron stars

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 064326 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.064326
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
Footnote

Feng-Shou Zhang is an editorial board member for Nuclear Science and Techniques and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.