logo

Determination of neutron-skin thickness using configurational information entropy

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Determination of neutron-skin thickness using configurational information entropy

Chun-Wang Ma
Yi-Pu Liu
Hui-Ling Wei
Jie Pu
Kai-Xuan Cheng
Yu-Ting Wang
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.33, No.1Article number 1Published in print Jan 2022Available online 17 Jan 2022
36700

Configurational information entropy (CIE) theory was employed to determine the neutron skin thickness of neutron-rich calcium isotopes. The nuclear density distributions and fragment cross-sections in 350 MeV/u 40-60Ca + 9Be projectile fragmentation reactions were calculated using a modified statistical abrasion-ablation model. CIE quantities were determined from the nuclear density, isotopic, mass, and charge distributions. The linear correlations between the CIE determined using the isotopic, mass, and charge distributions and the neutron skin thickness of the projectile nucleus show that CIE provides new methods to extract the neutron skin thickness of neutron-rich nuclei.

Neutron-skin thicknessConfigurational information entropyCross section distributionProjectile fragmentation
1

introduction

Next generation radioactive nuclear beam facilities will provide new opportunities to explore extreme nuclei near and beyond drip lines. Nuclei with a large neutron excess can form exotic neutron skin or halo structures, which have attracted significant interest experimentally and theoretically for the past 30 years. The neutron skin thickness is defined as δnp = δn - δp, which denotes the difference between the point neutron and point proton root-mean-square (RMS) radii of a nucleus. Many methods have been developed to experimentally determine the neutron skin thickness. However, most of the models are indirect measurements and model dependent. Typical methods used to determine neutron skin thickness include the reaction cross section (σR), charge-changing cross section (σcc) [1, 2], electric dipole polarizability [3], photon multiplicity [4], the π-/π+ ratio or ∑-/∑+ [5, 6], 3H/3He ratio [7], and α decay half-life time [8]. The projectile fragmentation reaction, which is the main experimental approach for studying rare isotopes, is suitable for determining the neutron skin thickness owing to the obvious experimental phenomena induced by the neutron skin structure [9, 10]. For example, isospin effects in the isotopic cross section[11], neutron-abrasion cross section (σnabr) [12], neutron removal cross section [13], mirror nuclei ratio or isobaric ratio [14], and isoscaling parameter (α) [15]. Parity-violating electron scattering (PVS) is the only method used to determine neutron skin thickness that is model-independent. Ref. [16] reports a theoretical investigate of PVS for 48Ca and 208Pb, and a theoretical investigation of Bayesian approach is given in Ref. [17]. Determining the neutron skin thickness of 48Ca and 208Pb is presently of significant interest and is listed in the U.S. 2015 Long Range Plan for Nuclear Science [18]. The lead radius experiment (PREX) has been previously used to determine the neutron skin thickness of 208Pb [19]. A recent PREX result indicates a much thicker neutron skin than previously predicted [20]. Determining the neutron skin thickness of nuclei near the neutron drip line remains an important research outcome and is one of the most interesting topics in the new era of radioactive beam facilities.

Information entropy theory was established by C.E. Shannon [21]. The theory makes it possible to transform variables in a system into an exact information quantity [22] and has been used in various applications [23, 24]. The first application of information entropy theory in heavy-ion reactions can be traced to the study of nuclear liquid-gas transition in nuclear multifragmentation [25]. Recent studies have extended it to study the information entropy carried by a single fragment produced in projectile fragmentation reactions, and revealed the scaling phenomenon of fragments covering a wide range of neutron excess [26-28]. Configurational information entropy (CIE) was developed to quantify the information entropy of a physical distribution [29], which connects the dynamical and informational contents of a physical system with localized configurations. Many applications of CIE methods can be found in Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) solitions, compact astrophysical systems, and scalar glueballs (see a brief introduction in Ref. [23]), theoretical research of new Higgs boson decay channels [30], deploying heavier eta meson states in AdS/QCD [31], confinement/deconfinement transition in QCD [32], quarkonium in a finite density plasma [33], time evolution in physical systems [34, 35], etc. In projectile fragmentation reactions, fragment distributions show a sensitive dependence on the change in neutron density [36-38], which makes it possible to determine the neutron skin thickness of neutron-rich nuclei. In this study, the CIE method was adopted to quantify the CIE of nuclear density and fragment distributions in projectile fragmentation reactions. The analyzed data were generated using a modified statistical abrasion ablation (SAA) model, which is known to be a good model for describing the fragment cross sections of projectile fragmentation reactions [39, 40].

2

Theories

2.1
Modified Statistical Abrasion-Ablation Model

The modified statistical abrasion-ablation (SAA) model [39, 40] can be used for projectile fragmentation reactions at both intermediate and high energies, which improves the original SAA model by Brohm and Schmidt [41]. In quasi-free nucleon-nucleon collisions, the reaction is described as a two-step process: In the initial stage, the nucleons are described by a Glauber-type model as "participants" and "spectators", where the participants interact strongly in an overlapping region between the projectile and target, while the spectators move virtually undisturbed [42]. In the second stage, the excitation energy is compared to the separation energies of protons, neutrons, and α to determine the type of particle the prefragment can emit according to min (sp,sn,sα). After the de-excitation calculation, the cross sections of final fragments that are comparable to the measured fragments were obtained. The description of the modified SAA model is presented in Refs. [23, 39, 40]. The colliding nuclei are composed of many parallel tubes oriented along the beam direction. Their transverse motion is neglected, and the interactions between the tube pairs are independent. For a specific pair of interacting tubes, the absorption of the projectile neutrons and protons is assumed to be in a binomial distribution. At a given impact parameter b, the transmission probabilities of neutrons (protons) of an infinitesimal tube in the projectile are calculated using ti(sb)=exp{[DnT(sb)σni+DpT(sb)σpi]}, (1) where DT is the normalized integrated nuclear density distribution of the target along the beam direction for protons d2sDpT=ZT and neutrons d2sDnT=NT (NT and ZT are the neutron and proton numbers of the target, respectively). s and b are defined in a plane perpendicular to the beam direction, and σii denotes the free-space nucleon-nucleon cross sections (i',i=n for neutrons and i',i=p for protons) [44]. The average absorbed mass in the infinitesimal tube limit at a given b is ΔA(b)=d2sDnT(s)[1tn(sb)]+d2sDpP(s)[1tp(sb)]. (2) For a specific fragment, the production cross section can be calculated using σ(ΔN,ΔZ)=d2bP(ΔN,b)P(ΔZ,b), (3) where PN,b) and PZ, b) are the probability distributions of the abraded neutrons and protons at a given impact parameter b, respectively. (Δ N, Δ Z) is the residual fragment after the abrasion stage, which is called the prefragment. The excitation energy of the prefragment is calculated as E*=13.3〈Δ A(b)〉 MeV, where A(b) is the number of abraded nucleons from the projectile, and 13.3 MeV is the mean excitation energy owing to an abraded nucleon [43]. In the second stage, the excitation energy is compared to the separation energies of protons, neutrons, and α to determine the type of particle the prefragment can emit according to min (sp,sn,sα). After the de-excitation calculation, the cross sections of final fragments that were comparable to the measured fragments were obtained.

Fermi-type density distributions were adopted for protons and neutrons in a nucleus, as shown in the equation below: ρi(r)=ρi01+exp(rCiti/4.4), i=n,p (4) where ρi0 is the normalization constant of neutrons (i=n) or protons (i=p), ti is the diffuseness parameter, and Ci is half the density radius of the neutron or proton density distribution.

2.2
Configurational Information Entropy Method

To determine the quantity of CIE incorporated in the fragment distributions, definitions of CIE were introduced. For a system with spatially localized clusters, when performing the CIE analysis, a set of functions f(x)L2(R) and their Fourier transforms F(k) obey Plancherel's theorem [45]: |f(x)|2dx=|F(k)|2dk, (5) where f(x) is square-integrable-bounded. The model fraction f(k) is defined as: f(k)=|F(k)|2|F(k)|2ddk, (6) where the integration is over all k, F(k) is defined, and d is the number of spatial dimensions.

The model fraction f(k) measures the relative weight of a given mode k. The quantity of CIE SC[f] is defined as a summation of the Shannon information entropy of f(k) [21]: SC[f]=m=1kfmln(fm). (7) Thus, the quantity of CIE has information about configurations compatible with certain constraints of a given physical system. If all the modes k have the same mass, then fm=1/N. The discrete configuration entropy reaches a maximum at SC=lnN. If there is only one mode, SC = 0.

Continuous CIE can also be defined for continuous distributions, such as the nuclear density distribution. For non-periodic functions in the interval (a, b), SC[f]=f˜(k)ln[f˜(k)]ddk, (8) where f˜(k)=f(k)/f(k)maxf(k)max is the maximum fraction]. The normalized function f˜(k) guarantees that f˜(k)1 for all k modes, and f˜(k)lnf˜(k) denotes the CIE density.

3

Results and discussion

The 350 MeV/u ApCa + 9Be reactions were calculated using the modified SAA model (Ap refers to even mass numbers from 40 to 60). The cross sections of fragments with Z ranging from 3 to 20 were obtained. For the sake of clarity, only part of the calculated results are shown in the figures. Figure 1 is a plot of the Fermi-type nuclear density distributions and their fast Fourier transformation (FFT) spectra. An obvious increase in ρn is observed from 40Ca to 60Ca, whereas the opposite trend is observed for ρp. A two-peak structure is evident in the FFT spectra, where the second peak is lower than the first. The difference between the neutron and proton density distributions Δρ=ρn-ρp is also shown. For 40Ca, Δρ is very small, while Δρ increases as the neutrons in the projectile increase. The peaks in the FFT spectra of ρn and ρp are not clearly shown. Based on the FFT spectra f(k), the CIE of ρn, ρp, and Δρ can be determined using Eq. (7), which are denoted by SCρn[f], SCρp[f], and SCΔρ[f], respectively.

Fig. 1
(Color online) Fermi-type nuclear density distributions [in panels (aj)] and the corresponding FFT spectrum [in panels (bj)]. Panels (a1), (a2), and (a3) show the proton densities (ρp), neutron densities (ρn), and the nuclear density difference Δρ=ρn-ρp for 40-60Ca isotopes.
pic

The isotopic cross section (σZ) distributions produced in the 350 MeV/u ApCa + 9Be reactions are plotted in Fig. 2. In panels (ai), from Zfr = 7 to 20, the isotopic cross-section distributions in the 40-60Ca reactions are similar for fragments with small Zfr, while a shift to the neutron-rich side is observed for larger Zfr. The symmetric Guassian-like shape of the isotopic distribution is altered by the enhanced cross sections of neutron-rich fragments in neutron-rich reaction systems, showing the isospin effect in fragment production induced by the increased neutron density on the surface of neutron-rich nuclei [40]. The FFT spectra of the isotopic distributions are shown in Fig. 2 (bj). In each FFT spectrum, only one peak is observed. The amplitudes of the FFT spectra of different isotopic distributions decrease as the projectile becomes more neutron-rich, except for Z = 20. Based on the FFT spectra of σZ distributions, the quantities of CIE of the isotopic distributions are determined according to Eq. (7), which is denoted by SCσZ[f].

Fig. 2
(Color online) The isotopic cross section distributions of fragments in the 350 MeV/u ApCa + 9Be reactions calculated using the modified SAA model. Panels (aj) correspond to Z = 7, 12, 16, and 20 isotopes, respectively, and panels (bj) plot the corresponding FFT spectra of (ai).
pic

The correlation between the SC[f] of the density distribution and δnp of the projectile nucleus is shown in Fig. 3(a). Both SCρn[f] and SCρp[f] decrease linearly with an increase in δnp from 40Ca to 60Ca. SCΔρ[f] also decreases linearly with increasing δnp, except for 40Ca. The correlation between the SCσZ[f] of different Zfr and δnp of the projectile nuclei are plotted in panel (b). The SCσZ[f] of isotopes from Zfr= 10 to 18 are also found to decrease with the increasing δnp of the projectile nucleus. The SCσZ[f] of the fragment near the projectile nucleus was more sensitive to the change in δnp.

Fig. 3
(Color online) (a) The correlation between the CIE of ρn (squares), ρp (circles), Δρ (triangles) and neutron skin-thickness δnp of ApCa. (b) Correlation between the CIE of the isotopic cross-section distributions SCσZ[f] and δnp of ApCa. The lines denote the linear fitting of the correlations.
pic

The mass yield (σA) distributions in the 350A MeV ApCa + 9Be reactions are shown in Fig. 4. In each reaction, the mass yield increases with the Afr of the fragment until it is close to the projectile nucleus. In different reactions, a very similar trend of mass distribution was observed, which decreased with the increasing mass number of the projectile nucleus. The corresponding quantities of CIE were determined from σA distributions, which are labeled as SCσA[f]. The correlation between SCσA[f] and δnp for projectile nuclei is shown in Fig. 4 (b). Except for the bend point formed at δnp for 42Ca owing to the transition of proton-skin to neutron skin, the SCσA[f]δnp correlation was found to be linear for reactions of Ap ≥ 44.

Fig. 4
(Color online) Panel (a): The mass yield distributions of the 350 MeV/u ApCa + 9Be reactions calculated using the modified SAA model. Panel (b): The correlation between SCσA[f] determined from the mass yield distribution and the δnp of ApCa (Ap denotes even mass numbers from 40 to 60).
pic

The charge cross section is defined as the summation of the isotopic cross sections σC=oσ(Ao,Z). The charge cross section distributions in the 350A MeV ApCa + 9Be reactions are shown in Fig. 5. Similar trends of σC distribution trends similar to those of σA were observed. The determined CIE of σC distributions, labeled as SCσC[f], were linearly correlated to the neutron skin thickness of the projectile nuclei.

Fig. 5
(Color online) Similar to Fig. 3 but for the charge cross section distributions.
pic

The CIE approach transfers the experimental distributions to quantified parameters and provides information probes for determining the properties of a system. From the SCσZ[f]δnp, SCσA[f]δnp, and SCσC[f]δnp correlations, it was observed that the CIE determined from isotopic, mass, and charge distributions decrease with increasing neutron skin thickness, respectively, and they had good linear correlations. The determination of neutron skin thickness, in particular, nuclei near the neutron drip line, is limited by the unavailability of effective probes. The linear correlation between the CIE and neutron-skin thickness of neutron-rich nuclei provides new approaches to determine the neutron skin thickness of the projectile nucleus by measuring the fragment distributions in projectile fragmentation reactions.

4

summary

With the vast opportunities for very asymmetric nuclei available in the new era of radioactive ion beam facilities, neutron skin thickness is one of the most important questions in nuclear physics. In this study, CIE theory is adopted to quantify the information entropy incorporated in nuclear density distributions and fragment cross-section distributions in 350 MeV/u 40-60Ca + 9Be projectile fragmentation reactions calculated using the modified SAA model. CIE quantities of nuclear density distributions (SCρn,p[f] and SCΔρ[f]), isotopic cross-section distributions (SCσZ[f]), mass cross-section distributions (SCσA[f]), and charge cross-section distributions (SCσC[f]) were determined. The correlations between SCρp[f]δnp, SCρn[f]δnp, SCΔρ[f]δnp, and SCσZ[f]δnp, SCσA[f]δnp, and SCσC[f]δnp were also investigated. For neutron-rich calcium projectiles, obvious linear dependences of SCρn[f], SCρp[f], and SCΔρ[f] on δnp were observed. The SCσZ[f] of fragments with different Zfr is shown to linearly depend on the δnp of the projectile nucleus. It is found that, if the isotopic distribution is sensitive to isospin effects in the projectiles, the extracted SCσZ[f] will also be sensitive to their δnp. Good linear correlations between SCσA[f], SCσC[f], and δnp of the projectile nucleus were also observed. It is suggested that, from the viewpoint of CIE, the isotopic/mass/charge distributions in the projectile fragmentation reaction may be good probes for determining the neutron-skin thickness of neutron-rich nuclei.

In this work, the simple description of the nuclear density of a projectile nucleus is difficult to deal with nuclei of magic numbers, as well as large shape distortion. Further improvements should concentrate on the inputs of nuclear densities, such as the results obtained from density functional theories, relativistic mean and field theories, to better investigate the effects of nuclear density on fragment cross-section distributions and related CIE quantities.

References
[1] A. Ozawa, T. Moriguchi, T. Ohtsubo, et al.,

Charge-changing cross sections of 30Ne, 32,33Na with a proton target

. Phys. Rev. C 89, 044602 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.044602
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] S. Bagchi, R. Kanungo, W. Horiuchi et al.,

Neutron skin and signature of the N = 14 shell gap found from measured proton radii of 17-22N

. Phys. Lett. B 790, 251-256 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.01.024
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] X. Roca-Maza, X. Viñas, M. Centelles et al.,

Neutron skin thickness from the measured electric dipole polarizability in 68Ni, 120Sn, and 208Pb

. Phys. Rev. C 92, 064304 (2015). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.064304
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] G.F. Wei,

Probing the neutron-skin thickness by photon production from reactions induced by intermediate-energy protons

. Phys. Rev. C 92, 014614 (2015). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.014614
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] B. A. Li,

Probing the High Density Behavior of the Nuclear Symmetry Energy with High Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 192701 (2002). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.192701
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] D.C. Zhang, H.G. Cheng, Z. Q. Feng,

Hyperon Dynamics in Heavy-Ion Collisions near Threshold Energy

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 092501 (2021). doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/38/9/092501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] T.Z. Yan, S. Li,

Impact parameter dependence of the yield ratios of light particles as a probe of neutron skin

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 30, 43 (2019). doi: 10.1007/s41365-019-0572-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] N. Wan, C. Xu, Z.Z. Ren,

Exploring the sensitivity of α-decay half-life to neutron skin thickness for nuclei around 208Pb

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 22 (2017). doi: 10.1007/s41365-016-0174-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] H. Yu, D. Q. Fang, Y.G. Ma,

Investigation of the symmetry energy of nuclear matter using isospin-dependent quantum molecular dynamics

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 61 (2020). doi: 10.1007/s41365-020-00766-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] J. Liu, C. Gao, N. Wan, C. Xu,

Basic quantities of the equation of state in isospin asymmetric nuclear matter

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 57 (2021). doi: 10.1007/s41365-021-00955-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] C.W. Ma, S.S. Wang,

Isospin dependence of projectile fragmentation and neutron-skin thickness of neutron-rich nuclei

. Chin. Phys. C 35, 1017-1021 (2011). doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/35/11/007
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] C.W. Ma, Y. Fu, D.Q. Fang et al.,

A possible experimental observable for the determination of neutron skin thickness

. Chin. Phys. B 17, 1216-1222 (2008). doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/17/4/011
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] T. Aumann, C.A. Bertulani, F. Schindler et al.,

Peeling Off Neutron Skins from Neutron-Rich Nuclei: Constraints on the Symmetry Energy from Neutron-Removal Cross Sections

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 262501 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.262501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] C. W. Ma, H.L. Wei, Y.G. Ma,

Neutron-skin effects in isobaric yield ratios for mirror nuclei in a statistical abrasion-ablation model

. Phys. Rev. C 88, 044612 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044612
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] Z.T. Dai, D.Q. Fang, Y.G. Ma et al.,

Effect of neutron skin thickness on projectile fragmentation

. Phys. Rev. C 91, 034618 (2015). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.034618
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] J. Liu, Z. Ren, C. Xu et al.,

Electroweak charge density distributions with parity-violating electron scattering

. Phys. Rev. C 88, 054321 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.054321
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] J. Xu,

Constraining Isovector Nuclear Interactions with Giant Dipole Resonance and Neutron Skin in Pb-208 from a Bayesian Approach

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 042101 (2021). doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/38/4/042101
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] Nuclear Science Advisory Committee, Reaching for the Horizon: The 2015 U.S. Long Range Plan for Nuclear Science, 2015
[19] S. Abrahamyan, Z. Ahmed, H. Albataineh et al.,

Measurement of the Neutron Radius of 208Pb through Parity Violation in Electron Scattering

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 112502 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.112502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] B.T. Reed, F.J. Fattoyev, C.J. Horowitz et al.,

Implications of PREX-2 on the Equation of State of Neutron-Rich Matter

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172503 (2021). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172503
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] C.E. Shannon, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379C429; 623C656 (1948).
[22] A.E. Bernardini, R. da Rocha,

Entropic information of dynamical AdS/QCD holographic models

. Phys. Lett. B 762, 107-115 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.023
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] C.W. Ma, Y.G. Ma,

Isobaric yield ratio difference and Shannon information entropy

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 99, 120-158 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.01.002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] J. Chen, D. Keane, Y.G. Ma et al.,

Antinuclei in heavy-ion collisions

, Phys. Rep. 760, 1 (2018).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] Y.G. Ma,

Application of Information Theory in Nuclear Liquid Gas Phase Transition

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3617 (1999). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3617
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] C.W. Ma, H.L. Wei, S.S. Wang et al.,

Isobaric yield ratio difference and Shannon information entropy

. Phys. Lett. B 742, 19-22 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.01.015
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[27] C.W. Ma, Y.D. Song, C.Y. Qiao et al.,

A scaling phenomenon in the difference of Shannon information uncertainty of fragments in heavy-ion collisions

. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 43, 045102 (2016). doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/4/045102
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[28] C.W. Ma, H.L. Wei, X.Q. Liu et al.,

Nuclear fragments in projectile fragmentation reactions

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 121, 103991 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103911
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[29] M. Gleise, N. Stamatopoulos,

Entropic measure for localized energy configurations: Kinks, bounces, and bubbles

. Phys. Lett. B 713, 304-307 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.064
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[30] A. Alves, A.G. Dias, R. da Silva,

The 7% rule: A maximum entropy prediction on new decays of the Higgs boson

. Nucl. Phys. B 959, 115137 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115137
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[31] R. da Rocha,

Deploying heavier meson states: Configurational entropy hybridizing AdS/QCD

. Phys. Lett. B 814, 136112 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136112
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[32] N.R.F. Braga, O.C. Junqueira,

Configuration entropy and confinement/deconfinement transiton in holographic QCD

. Phys. Lett. B 814, 136082 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136082
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[33] N.R.F. Braga, R. da Mata,

Configuration entropy for quarkonium in a finite density plasma

. Phys. Rev. D 101, 105016 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.105016
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[34] F. Li, G. Chen,

The evolution of information entropy components in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 167 (2020). doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00169-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[35] J.C. Zhang, W. K. Ren, N.D. Jin,

Rescaled Range Permutation Entropy: A Method for Quantifying the Dynamical Complexity of Extreme Volatility in Chaotic Time Series

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 37, 090501 (2020). doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/37/9/090501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[36] C.W. Ma, X.M. Bai, J. Yu et al.,

Neutron density distributions of neutron-rich nuclei studied with the isobaric yield ratio difference

. Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 139 (2014). doi: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14139-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[37] C.W. Ma, S.S. Wang, H.L. Wei et al.,

Re-examination of Finite-Size Effects in Isobaric Yield Ratios Using a Statistical Abrasion-Ablation Model

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 30, 052101 (2013). doi: 10.1088/0256-307x/30/5/052501;
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[38] C.W. Ma, H.L. Wei, Y.G. Ma,

Neutron-skin effects in isobaric yield ratios for mirror nuclei in a statistical abrasion-ablation model

. Phys. Rev. C 88, 044612 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044612
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[39] D.Q. Fang, W.Q. Shen, J. Feng et al.,

Isospin effect of fragmentation reactions induced by intermediate energy heavy ions and its disappearance

. Phys. Rev. C 61, 044610 (2000). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.61.044610
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[40] C.W. Ma, J.Y. Wang, H.L. Wei et al.,

Isospin dependence of projectile-like fragment production at intermediate energies

. Phys. Rev. C 79, 034606 (2009). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.034606
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[41] T. Brohm, K.-H. Schmidt,

Statistical abrasion of nucleons from realistic nuclear-matter distributions

. Nucl. Phys. A 569, 821-832 (1994). doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90386-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[42] Y. Eisenberg,

Interaction of Heavy Primary Cosmic Rays in Lead

. Phys. Rev. 96 1378 (1954). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.96.1378
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[43] J.J. Gaimard, K.-H. Schmidt,

A reexamination of the abrasion-ablation model for the description of the nuclear fragmentation reaction

. Nucl. Phys. A 531, 709-745 (1991). doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(91)90748-U
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[44] X. Cai, J. Feng, W. Shen et al.,

In-medium nucleon-nucleon cross section and its effect on total nuclear reaction cross section

. Phys. Rev. C 58, 572-575 (1998). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.572
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[45] W. Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis, McGrawCHill, 1987, Singapore