logo

Static or dynamic pear-shapes in radioactive nucleus 224Rn?

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Static or dynamic pear-shapes in radioactive nucleus 224Rn?

Xian-Ye Wu
Jin-Ze Cao
Kun-Ning Zhao
Zhong-Min Liu
Jian Xiang
En-Fu Zhou
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.35, No.11Article number 202Published in print Nov 2024Available online 14 Oct 2024
15601

We report a comprehensive study on low-lying parity doublet states of 224Rn by mixing both quadrupole and octupole-shaped configurations in multireference covariant density functional theory, in which broken symmetries in configurations are restored using projection techniques. The low-lying energy spectrum is reasonably reproduced when the shape fluctuations in both the quadrupole and octupole shapes are considered. Electric octupole transition strength in 224Rn is found to be B(E3;3101+)=43 W.u., comparable to that in 224Ra, whose data are 42(3) W.u.. Our results indicate that 224Rn shares similar low-energy structure with 224Ra despite the excitation energy of first 3- state of the former nucleus is higher than that of the latter. This study suggests 225Rn is a candidate for the search for permanent electric dipole moment.

Covariant density functional theoryParity-doublet bandsOctupole correlations and Electric transition strengths
1

Introduction

The majority of the nuclei on the nuclear chart are characterized by reflection-symmetric shapes, either spherical or quadrupolar, in their ground states. However, atomic nuclei with a proton number Z or neutron numbers N34, 56, 88, and 134 possess strong octupole correlations exhibiting dynamical or static octupole deformations [1, 2]. Signatures of the nuclei with the static octupole-deformed shape include the presence of a low-lying positive- and negative-parity doublets as well as strong electric the dipole (E1) and octupole (E3) transition strengths. According to this criterion, the observation of a low-lying 3- state and enhanced E3 transitions in the 144,146Ba [3-5], 222Ra [6], 224Ra [7] and 226Ra [8] suggest that these nuclei have a stable octupole deformation. By contrast, some atomic nuclei with slightly weaker E3 transitions but relatively larger excitation energy for the 3- state are usually interpreted as octupole vibrators such as 228Ra [6], as well as 208Pb and 220Rn [7]. Additionally, low-lying negative-parity states or enhanced E1 transitions were measured, indicating that 222-226Rn are vibrators [9] and 228Th is pear-shaped [10]. However, in suggested octupole deformed nuclei, a strict alternation between positive and negative-parity energy levels are not observed. To draw a solid conclusion as to whether these nuclei belong to octupole rotors or vibrators, additional measurements, and comprehensive theoretical studies on these nuclei are required.

Atomic nuclei with octupole correlations have been extensively studied with various nuclear models [11-17], including self-consistent mean-field (SCMF) methods based on different energy density functionals (EDFs)[18-31] and beyond, in combination with the interacting boson models[32-35] or collective Hamiltonians [36-39]. In particular, the generator coordinate method (GCM) implemented using quantum-number projection techniques, including parity, particle-number, and angular-momentum projections have been developed for the low-lying states of the atomic nuclei with octupole correlations based on different EDFs [40-44]. Within this multireference density functional theory (MR-DFT), it has been demonstrated that the low-lying states of 208Pb are multioctupole-phonon excitations [43]. By contrast, for 144,146Ba, and 224Ra, the octupole shapes of positive-parity states rapidly stabilize with an increase in spin, gradually drifting toward those of negative-parity ones [41, 42]. Given this success, we extended the MR-DFT framework to study the low-lying states of 224Rn, including the energy spectrum and electric multipole transition strengths based on relativistic energy density functional (EDF) to shed light on whether the nucleus belong to octupole rotors or vibrators.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2. introduction to MR-DFT based on the relativistic EDF is presented. In Sec. 3, we discuss the calculation results for the low-lying states of 224Rn compared with those of 224Ra. Finally, a summary is presented in Sec. 4.

2

Theoretical framework

In MR-DFT, the nuclear wave functions of the low-lying parity doublet states are constructed as linear combinations of sets of quantum numbers projected nonorthogonal mean-field states |q around the equilibrium shape, |ΨαJπ=qfαJπ(q)P^MKJP^NP^ZP^π|q(β2,β3), (1) where α denotes the different quantum states corresponding to a given Jπ. The symbol q represents the quadrupole, and octupole deformation parameters for each mean-field state. The operators P^MKJ, P^N,Z, and P^π are used to select the components of configurations with specific quantum numbers, namely the angular momentum J, neutron (proton) number N(Z) and parity π=± [45].

The mean-field states |q are generated from the point-coupling relativistic mean field and BCS (PC-RMF+BCS) calculations with constraints on the average nucleon numbers and quadrupole-octupole moments using the variational principle δq|H^τ=n,pλτN^τλ=1,2,3Cλ(Q^λ0qλ)2|q=0 (2) with Lagrange multipliers λτ determined by the constraints q|N^τ|q=N(Z). The position of the center-of-mass coordinate is fixed at the origin to decouple the spurious states using the constraint q|Q^10|q=0. N^τ and Q^λ0rλYλ0 are the particle number and multipole moment operator, respectively. qλ is the constrained value of the multipole moment and Cλ is the corresponding stiffness constant [45]. Deformation parameters βλ(λ=2,3) are defined as follows: βλ4π3AR0λq|Q^λ0|q (3) with R0=r0A1/3 and A represents the mass number of the nucleus and r0=1.2 fm.

The weight function fαJπ(q) is given by Eq. (1) is determined by solving the Hill–Wheeler–Griffin: (HWG) equation [46, 47]. qb[HJπ(qa,qb)EαJπNJπ(qa,qb)]fαJπ(qb)=0, (4) where the kernels are expressed as OJπ(qa,qb)=qa|O^P^KMJP^πP^NP^Z|^qb (5) with operators O^ representing H^ and 1 for the the Hamiltonian kernel HJπ(qa,qb) and the norm kernel NJπ(qa,qb).

The electric multipole transition probabilities B() obtained from the initial state (Jiπiαi) into the final state (Jfπfαf) are calculated according to the Wigner–Eckart Theorem: B(Eλ;JiπiαiJfπfαf)=e22Ji+1|qi,qf[fαiJiπi(qi)][fαfJfπf(qf)]×ΦαfJfπf(qf)Q^λΦαiJiπi(qi)|2 (6) with a reduced transition matrix element, ΦαfJfπf(qf)Q^λΦαiJiπi(qi)=δπiπf,(1)λ(2Jf+1)(2Ji+1)2M(JfλJi0MM)×0πdθsin(θ)dM0Ji(θ)Φ(qf)|Q^λMeiθJ^yP^πP^NP^Z|Φ(qi), (7) where Q^λMer2YλM denotes the electric multipole moment operator of rank λ. More details on the MR-DFT for quadrupole-octupole nuclei can be found in Refs. [41-44, 48, 49].

3

Results and discussions

The Dirac spinors of the nucleons are expanded in a set of harmonic oscillator basis with 14 major shells. In the PC-RMF+BCS calculations, the relativistic EDF PC-PK1 [50] was employed. Only the degrees of freedom of the axial symmetry deformation were considered in the current study. Pairing correlations between nucleons are treated within the BCS approximation using a density-independent δforce with smooth cutoffs [51]. Strength parameters of the pairing force are set to Vn=-349.5 MeV fm3 for the neutrons and Vp=-330.0 MeV fm3 for protons. In the calculation of the projected kernels, Nβ=16 mesh points are used for the rotation angle β, and Nφ=7 for the gauge angle φ, both within the interval [0,π]. Since the low-lying parity-doublet bands of 224Rn are primarily characterized by prolate deformed configurations with β2>0, the oblate deformed configurations with β2<0 are excluded in the final configuration-mixing GCM calculations to reduce computational costs. The Pfaffian method [52, 53] is implemented to avoid the sign problem when calculating the norm kernel overlap.

Figure 1 presents the energies of the mean-field states for 224Rn normalized to the energy minimum in β2β3 deformation plane. It is shown that, although the energy minimum is at β3=0, the energy surface is soft along the β3 direction around the minimum, which is similar to the findings in study using the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov (RHB) method [26]. The softness of the energy surface in 224Rn is attributed to the coupling of the proton orbitals i13/2f7/2 and the neutron orbitals j13/2g7/2 around the the Fermi surfaces [54]. The soft behavior indicates that the dynamic correlation effects, including symmetry restoration and quadrupole-octupole shape fluctuations can be significant in the low-lying states of 224Rn.

Fig. 1
(Color online) The mean-field energy surface of 224Rn in β2-β3 deformation plane normalized to the energy minimum. Two neighboring contour lines are separated by 0.4 MeV
pic

Figure 2 shows the energy surfaces of 224Rn with projections to good nucleon numbers and spin parity Jπ=0+,1,2+, and 3-. Since the mean-field configurations with very small values of β3 are predominated by components with positive parity, the energies of the negative parity states projected from these mean-field configurations are not shown. The energy minimum of the 0+ state shifts to an octupole-deformed shape with β2=0.1,β3=±0.05. The energy gained from the restoration of broken symmetries for the energy-minim state is ~4.23 MeV. The energy surface of the 2+ state is similar to that of the of 0+ state, except that it is softer along the quadrupole deformation β2[0.10,0.20] with octupole deformation β3[0.10,+0.10]. A similar result was observed in the potential energy surfaces (PESs) with J=1 (cf. Fig. 2(c)), and J=3 (cf. Fig. 2(d)), where the absolute minima are well separated along β3-direction. The projected PESs with J=1 and J=3 show the soft structures in octupole β3±0.15 with a quadrupole deformation ranging from β20.10 to 0.25.

Fig. 2
(Color online) The energies of states in 224Rn with projections onto good nucleon numbers, different spin parities with (a) Jπ=0+, (b) Jπ=2+, (c) Jπ=1, and (d) Jπ=3 in β2-β3 deformation plane normalized to the energy minimum of each J state
pic

The quadrupole-octupole deformed configurations with good quantum numbers serve as the basis for expanding the wave functions of the low-lying state within the GCM. Figure 3 shows the excitation energies of the positive- and negative-parity bands calculated by solving the HWG equations (4) for three different configuration-mixing schemes. Calculation Results are compared with data from Ref. [9]. The calculation by mixing configurations with different β2 and fixed β3=0.05 provides very spread energy spectrum. In particular, the negative-parity states are very high in energy. By contrast, by mixing configurations with different β3 values but fixed β2=0.15, the energy spectrum were significantly compressed. In the full quadrupole-octupole configuration mixing calculation, the negative-parity states shift and approached the data.

Fig. 3
(Color online) The energy spectra of low-lying states in 224Rn obtained from the GCM calculations with (b) (β2, β3), (c) (β2=0.15, β3), and (d) (β2, β3=0.05) as generating coordinates, respectively. The data from Ref. [9] are shown in (a)
pic

Figure 4 shows a detailed comparison of the low-lying parity-doublet states including electric multipole transition strength B(). It can be observed that the results calculated using the configuration-mixing GCM (Fig. 4(b)) and a single energy-minimum configuration (Fig. 4(c)) show similar parity doublet bands with rotational characteristics. In contrast to the results of GCM calculations, the positive-parity band is more compressed in single-configuration calculations, where the negative-parity band becomes slightly lower than that obtained from GCM calculation. Quantitatively, the excitation energy E(1-) of the negative-parity band head is 0.47 MeV and 0.39 MeV from the GCM and single-configuration calculations, respectively. For the 3- state, the calculated excitation energy E(3-) from the GCM is 0.63 MeV, which is in good agreement with the data of E(3-)=0.65 MeV. The electric octupole transition strength of 224Rn is B(E3;30+)=43 W.u., which is comparable to that for 224Ra B(E3;30+)=42(3) W.u.. This provides evidence for the increased strength of octupole correlations in the area surrounding A=224 mass nuclei, even though the negative-parity 3- state of 224Rn has a much higher excitation energy. These results are obtained for 224Ra, however, the transition strengths are reproduced perfectly [41]. In future experiments, it is important to further verify the calculated intraband E2 transitions in the same parity band, as well as the interband E1 and E3 transitions connected to the ground-state band of 224Rn. This investigation indicates that the calculated energies for the excited states are slightly higher than expected. The discrepancy is likely due to the omission of triaxial and time reversal symmetry-breaking components in the model calculations, as discussed in previous studies on other nuclei with different GCM approaches [55, 56], however, when considering these symmetry breaks require consideration of the GCM calculations with cranking or particle-hole excitation configurations and the inclusion of three-dimensional angular-momentum projection (3DAMP), which is beyond the framework of our proposed model.

Fig. 4
(Color online) Low-lying energy spectra for 224Rn. The available data are collected from Ref. [9] and the results calculated from configuration-mixing GCM and single energy-minimum configuration are shown in (a), (b), and (c) columns, respectively. The numbers on the arrows are intraband E2 (blue color for positive-parity and red color for negative-parity bands) and interband E1 (green color) or E3 (violet color) transition strengths connecting to the ground state band. All transition strengths are in Weisskopf units
pic

Figure 5 shows the collective nuclear wave functions |gαJπ|2 for low-lying parity doublet states of the angular momentum and parity in 224Rn, where the orthonormal collective wave function gαJπ is constructed as gαJπ(qa)=qb[NJπ]qa,qb1/2fαJπ(qb). (8) The distribution of the collective wave functions in the β2β3 plane is usually adopted to analyze staggering behaviors in low-lying parity doublet states. The wave functions of the states become increasingly concentrated in a quadrupole-octupole deformed configuration with an increase in angular momentum, demonstrating a picture of rotation-induced shape stabilization. Similar to 224Ra [41], from the perspective of collective nuclear wave functions, the radioactive nucleus 224Rn exhibits a transition from a gentle octupole deformation to a stable pear shape. We examined the nuclear wave functions of 224Rn and found that the calculations involving configurations with different β3 and a fixed β2 yield results similar to those of 224Ra (cf. Figs. 4(e) and 4(f) in Ref. [41]). As the spin increases, the dominant configuration for the positive-parity states gradually shifted from weak octupole configurations to those with large octupole shapes. Conversely, for the negative-parity states, the collective wave functions are zero at β3=0 and become concentrated around large octupole-deformed configurations. This corresponds with the evolution trend of the collective wave functions with the spins from the full GCM calculations, as shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
(Color online) Collective wave functions of the parity-doublet states (a) with Jπ=0+, 2+, …, 8+ and (b) with Jπ=1-, 3-, …, 9- in the β2-β3 deformation plane. See text for details
pic

Figure 6 shows the energy ratio RJ/2 of the excitation energy of each state with an angular momentum J relative to that of positive-parity 2+ states for 224Rn. For comparison, the experimental data for 224Ra are also provided. The ratio is defined as RJ/2=Ex(Jπ)/Ex(2+), where π=+ and - indicate positive and negative parity, respectively. The phenomenon of interleaving the positive and negative parity bands is a common method used to study the nuclei with octupole correlation. In idealized interleaving parity doublet bands, the ratio RJ/2 shows a quadratic-like function as angular momentum J increases. First, the energy levels of positive- and negative-parity bands remain decoupled, resulting in odd-even staggering and the staggering amplitude globally decreases with increasing J in 224Rn. This feature is similar to that obtained from the GCM calculations for 224Ra [41] and Ba isotopes [42]. The tendency of the staggering amplitude of RJ/2 as a function of the angular momentum is reproduced qualitatively for 224Rn. However, the staggering amplitude deviates from the experimental data. The single energy-minimum configuration overestimates the staggering amplitude of ratio RJ/2 resulting from the lower E(2+) value of positive-parity 2+ state obtained (cf. Fig. 4(c)). However, after considering the configuration-mixing effects, as shown in Fig. 4(b), an overestimation of the excitation energy 21+ state results in an underestimation of the RJ/2-staggering amplitude in the GCM calculations. The inset panel of the Fig. 6 shows the normalized staggering SJ/2 between the positive- and negative-parity bands. It is defined as [57] SJ/2=|Ex(J±)(J+1)Ex(J1)JEx(J+1)2J+1|/Ex(2+). (9) Superscripts denote the parity of the two bands. This quantity reflects the octupole deformation stability changing with angular momentum J(). It is clear that the normalized staggering SJ/2 decreases as the angular momen J() increases. In brief, variations in the staggering RJ/2 and SJ/2 with increasing angular momentum J() show a behavior characteristic from octupole vibration at a lower J() to octupole rotation at a higher J() in 224Rn.

Fig. 6
(Color online) Ratio RJ/2 of the excitation energy of each J± state to that of positive-parity 2+ state as a function of the angular momentum J() for 224Rn. The inset panel is the normalized staggering amplitude SJ/2 as a function of the angular momentum J(). The results are calculated from configuration-mixing GCM and single energy-minimum configuration. Experimental data of 224Ra [7] are also given for comparison
pic

Figure 7 shows the correlation between the excitation energies of 224Rn and 224Ra. Both the calculated and the experimental data deviated slightly from the diagonal line. As the spin increases, the excitation energies of the positive- and negative-parity states in 224Rn and 224Ra increased at a similar rate. In Fig. 7(a), it is clear that our calculations overestimate the excitation energies of positive parity states. However, a linear relationship of the excitation energies between 224Rn and 224Ra is consistent with that of experimental data. This phenomenon has also been observed in negative-parity bands, as shown in Fig. 7(b). Furthermore, we plot Fig. 8 to demonstrate the relationship of the electric transition strengths between 224Ra and 224Rn. A linear increasing relationship is also found in the intraband transitions B(E2;L±(L2)±) or the interband transition B(E3;L(L3)+) and B(E1;L(L1)+) in the parity doublet bands. Moreover, for the interband B(E1) and B(E3) transitions between the positive- and negative-parity doublet bands, the linearity gradually deviates from the diagonal line as the spin increases, as shown in Fig. 8(b). However, the intraband transitions B(E2) of positive- and negative-parity bands tend to exhibit a diagonal distribution with increasing spin in Fig. 8(a). It appears that the fundamental structure associated with the quadrupole-octupole correlations in 224Rn exhibits similar behavior to that of 224Ra.

Fig. 7
(Color online) (a) Theoretical and experimental excitation energies of positive-parity states in 224Ra against the values in 224Rn. (b) Same as (a) but for negative-parity states. The results of calculations for 224Ra are taken from Ref. [41] and the available data are taken from Refs. [7, 9]
pic
Fig. 8
(Color online) (a) Same as Fig. 7 but for electric multipole transition strengths. (a) Intraband transitions B(E2;L±(L2)±) with even L=2, 4, 6, 8 and odd L=3, 5, 7 stand for positive- and negative-parity bands, respectively. (b) Interband transition B(E3;L(L3)+) or B(E1;L(L1)+) with L=3, 5, 7 connect to parity-doublet bands
pic

The transition octupole moment Q3(30+) can be derived from the transition matrix elements: 3M^(E3)0+, which corresponds to the 30+ transitions. We plot Fig. 9 to show the relationship between the transition octupole moment Q3(30+) and the energy E(3-) of the negative-parity state in 224Rn, which is denoted by an open square. The solid squares show the measured Q3 values with error bars for the nuclei with mass A > 200 in the Z88 and N134 regions, as reported in [7, 6]. For comparison, we have also included the calculated Q3 value for 224Ra, as given in Ref. [41]. 208Pb has a typical dynamic pear-shaped octupole vibrator is characterized by the highest E(3-) energy with a minor Q3 value. For the nuclei such as 220Rn, 230,232Th, and 234U with similar Q3 values to that of 208Pb are considered octupole vibrators. Larger Q3 and smaller E(3-) values for 222Ra, 224Ra, and 226Ra indicate an enhancement in octupole collectivity that is consistent with the onset of octupole deformation in this mass region. Although a more stretched negative-parity band is obtained, our results indicate that the E(3-) energy of the experimental data is reproduced very well for 224Rn [cf. Fig. 4]. The predicted transition octupole moment Q3 of 224Rn shows as larger as that of 224Ra, indicating that 224Rn is likely to exhibit strong octupole correlations. Therefore, 224Rn has a high probability of being a rotor in our theoretical calculations. Further measurements of Qλ(λ=1 or 3) are required to confirm the possibility of enhanced octupole collectivity for 224Rn.

Fig. 9
(Color online) Relationship between the transition octupole moment Q3(30+) and the energy E(3-) of the negative-parity state in 224Rn, denoted by an open square. The solid squares indicate the measured Q3 values with error bars for nuclei with mass A > 200 reported in [7, 6]. The calculated Q3 value for 224Ra [41] (open square) have been included for comparison. The horizontal dashed line represents the Q3 value of octupole vibrator 208Pb
pic
4

Summary

In this study, we present a beyond-mean-field study of the low-lying parity doublet bands in 224Rn with a multireference covariant density functional theory, in which the dynamic correlations related to symmetry restoration and quadrupole-octupole shape fluctuations were treated using the generator coordinate method, combined with the parity, particle number, and angular momentum projections. The low-lying energy spectrum is reasonably reproduced when the shape fluctuations in both the quadrupole and octupole shapes are considered. Collective nuclear wave functions and the low-lying spectrum-related energy ratio RJ/2 and the normalized staggering SJ/2 suggest a transition from gentle octupole deformation to a stable pear-shaped structure. The results of 224Rn were compared to those of 224Ra. We have found these two nuclei have similar electric octupole (E3) transition strength. Specifically, B(E3;30+)=43 W.u. for 224Rn, comparable to the experimental value of 224Ra (42(3) W.u.). This result indicates that 224Rn may possess a similar strong octupole correlation to that in 224Ra, even though the excitation energy of 3- in 224Rn is approximately twice that of 224Ra. However, a more solid conclusion can only be drawn based on related octupole criteria such as the electric dipole E1 and octupole E3 transition probabilities, which will be measured in the future. This study suggests that 225Rn atom, similar to 225Ra atoms [58, 59], can serve as another candidate for measuring permanent atomic electric dipole moment.

References
1. I. Ahmad and P.A. Butler,

Octupole shapes in nuclei

. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 71 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.43.120193.000443
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. P.A. Butler and W. Nazarewicz,

Intrinsic reflection asymmetry in atomic nuclei

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 349 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.349
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. B. Bucher, S. Zhu, C. Y. Wu et al.,

Direct evidence of octupole deformation in neutron-rich 144Ba

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 112503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.112503
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. B. Bucher, S. Zhu, C.Y. Wu et al.,

Direct evidence for octupole deformation in 146Ba and the origin of large E1 moment variations in reflection-asymmetric nuclei

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 152504 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysReLett.118.152504
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. S.J. Zhu, E.H. Wang, J.H. Hamilton et al.,

Coexistence of reflection asymmetric and symmetric shapes in 144Ba

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 032501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.032501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. P. A. Butler, L. P. Gaffney, P. Spagnoletti et al.,

Evolution of octupole deformation in radium nuclei from Coulomb excitation of radioactive 222Ra and 228Ra beams

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 042503 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.042503
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. L.P. Gaffney, P.A. Butler, M. Scheck et al.,

Studies of pear-shaped nuclei using accelerated radioactive beams

. Nature 497, 199 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12073
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. H. J. Wollersheim, H. Emling, H. Grein et al.,

Coulomb excitation of 226Ra

. Nucl. Phys. A 556, 261 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90351-W
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. P. A. Butler, L. P. Gaffney, P. Spagnoletti et al.,

The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nuclei

. Nat. Commun. 10, 2473 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10494-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. M. M. R. Chishti, D. O’Donnell, G. Battaglia et al.,

Direct measurement of the intrinsic electric dipole moment in pear-shaped thorium-228

. Nat. Phys. 16, 853 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0899-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. W. Nazarewicz, P. Olanders, I. Ragnarsson et al.,

Analysis of octupole instability in medium-mass and heavy nuclei

. Nucl. Phys. A 429, 269 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(84)90208-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. P. Möller, R. Bengtsson, B. G. Carlsson et al.,

Axial and reflection asymmetry of the nuclear ground state

. Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 94, 758 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2008.05.002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. T. M. Shneidman, G. G. Adamian, N. V. Antonenko, R. V. Jolos, and W. Scheid,

Cluster interpretation of parity splitting in alternating parity bands

. Phys. Lett. B 526, 322 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01512-X
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. T.M. Shneidman, G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko et al.,

Cluster interpretation of properties of alternating parity bands in heavy nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 67, 014313 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.014313
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. N. Yoshinaga, K. Yanase, K. Higashiyama et al.,

Octupole phonon model based on the shell model for octupole vibrational states

. Phys. Rev. C 98, 044321 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044321
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. N. Yoshinaga, K. Yanase, C. Watanabe et al.,

Large-scale nuclear shell-model calculations of isotopes in the southwest region of 208Pb

. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 063D01 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptab039
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. X. Yin, C. Ma, Y.M. Zhao,

Alternating-parity doublets of even-even Ba isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 109, 024322 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.024322
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. P. Bonche, P. Heenen, H. Flocard et al.,

Self-consistent calculation of the quadrupole-octupole deformation energy surface of 222Ra

. Phys. Lett. B 175, 387 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)90609-X
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. L. M. Robledo, J. L. Egido, J. Berger et al.,

Stable octupole deformation in some actinide nuclei

. Phys. Lett. B 187, 223 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91085-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. S. Ebata and T. Nakatsukasa,

Octupole deformation in the nuclear chart based on the 3D Skyrme Hartree-Fock plus BCS model

. Phys. Scr. 92, 064005 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aa6c4c
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. L. M. Robledo and R. R. Rodríguez-Guzmán,

Octupole deformation properties of actinide isotopes within a mean field approach

. J. Phys. G 39, 105103 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/39/10/105103
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. Y. Cao, S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev et al.,

Landscape of pear-shaped even-even nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 102, 024311 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024311
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. L.-S. Geng, J. Meng, and H. Toki,

Reflection asymmetric relativistic mean field approach and its application to the octupole deformed nucleus 226Ra

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 24, 1865 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/24/7/021
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. J.Y. Guo, P. Jiao, and X.-Z. Fang,

Microscopic description of nuclear shape evolution from spherical to octupole-deformed shapes in relativistic mean-field theory

. Phys. Rev. C 82, 047301 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.047301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. B.-N. Lu, J. Zhao, E.-G. Zhao et al.,

Multidimensionally-constrained relativistic mean-field models and potential-energy surfaces of actinide nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 89, 014323 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.014323
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev, and P. Ring,

Octupole deformation in the ground states of even-even nuclei: A global analysis within the covariant density functional theory

. Phys. Rev. C 93, 044304 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044304
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. S. E. Agbemava and A. V. Afanasjev,

Octupole deformation in the ground states of even-even Z~96,N~196 actinides and superheavy nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 96, 024301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.024301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. W. Zhang and Y. F. Niu,

Shape transition with temperature of the pear-shaped nuclei in covariant density functional theory

. Phys. Rev. C 96, 054308 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054308
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. Y.-T. Qiu, X.-W. Wang, and J.-Y. Guo,

Microscopic analysis of the ground state properties of the even-even Dy isotopes in the reflection-asymmetric relativistic mean-field theory

. Phys. Rev. C 106, 034301 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.034301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30. J. Yang, J. Dudek, I. Dedes et al.,

Exotic symmetries as stabilizing factors for superheavy nuclei: Symmetry-oriented generalized concept of nuclear magic numbers

. Phys. Rev. C 106, 054314 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.054314
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31. Y. Su, Z.-Y. Li, L.-L. Liu et al.,

Sensitivity impacts owing to the variations in the type of zero-range pairing forces on the fission properties using the density functional theory

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 62 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01422-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32. K. Nomura, T. Nikšié, D. Vretenar,

Signatures of octupole correlations in neutron-rich odd-mass barium isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 97, 024317 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024317
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33. K. Nomura, R. Rodríguez-Guzmán, L. M. Robledo et al.,

Evolution of octupole deformation and collectivity in neutron-rich lanthanides

. Phys. Rev. C 104, 044324 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.044324
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34. K. Nomura, R. Rodríguez-Guamán, L. M. Robledo,

Quadrupole-octupole coupling and the evolution of collectivity in neutron-deficient Xe, Ba, Ce, and Nd isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 104, 054320 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.054320
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35. K. Nomura,

Octupole correlations in collective excitations of neutron-rich N≈56 nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 105, 054318 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054318
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36. X. Zhang, Y. Peng, C.-B. Zhou et al.,

Nuclear alternating-parity bands and transition rates in a model of coherent quadrupole-octupole motion in neutron-rich barium isotopes

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 27, 129 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0128-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37. Z. P. Li, T. Nikšié, and D. Vretenar,

Coexistence of nuclear shapes: self-consistent mean-field and beyond

. J. Phys. G 43, 024005 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/024005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
38. Z. Xu and Z.-P. Li,

Microscopic analysis of octupole shape transitions in neutron-rich actinides with relativistic energy density functional

. Chin. Phys. C 41, 124107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/41/12/124107
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
39. S.Y. Xia, H. Tao, Y. Lu et al.,

Spectroscopy of reflection-asymmetric nuclei with relativistic energy density functionals

. Phys. Rev. C 96, 054303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
40. R.N. Bernard, L.M. Robledo, T.R. Rodríguez,

Octupole correlations in the 144Ba nucleus described with symmetry-conserving configuration-mixing calculations

. Phys. Rev. C 93, 061302(R) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.061302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
41. J.M. Yao, E.F. Zhou, Z.P. Li,

Beyond relativistic mean-field approach for nuclear octupole excitations

. Phys. Rev. C 92, 041304(R) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.041304
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
42. Y. Fu, H. Wang, L.-J. Wang et al.,

Odd-even parity splittings and octupole correlations in neutron-rich Ba isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 97, 024338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024338
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
43. J. M. Yao and K. Hagino,

Anharmonicity of multi-octupole-phonon excitations in 208Pb: Analysis with multireference covariant density functional theory and subbarrier fusion of 16O+208Pb

. Phys. Rev. C 94, 011303(R) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.011303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
44. E.F. Zhou, J.M. Yao, Z.P. Li et al.,

Anatomy of molecular structures in 20Ne

. Phys. Lett. B 753, 227 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.0280
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
45. P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980).
46. D.L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler,

Nuclear constitution and the interpretation of fission phenomena

. Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.1102
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
47. J.J. Griffin and J. A. Wheeler,

Collective motions in nuclei by the method of generator coordinates

. Phys. Rev. 108, 311 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.311
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
48. J. M. Yao, “Symmetry Restoration Methods” in Handbook of Nuclear Physics, edited by I. Tanihata, H. Toki, and T. Kajino (Springer, Berlin, 2022) pp. 136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1_18-1
49. E.F. Zhou and J. M. Yao,

Generator coordinate method for nuclear octupole excitations: status and perspectives

. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 32, 2340011 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301323400116
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
50. P. W. Zhao, Z. P. Li, J.M. Yao et al.,

New parametrization for the nuclear covariant energy density functional with a point-coupling interaction

. Phys. Rev. C 82, 054319 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.054319
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
51. S. J. Krieger, P. Bonche, H. Flocard et al.,

An improved pairing interaction for mean field calculations using skyrme potentials

. Nucl. Phys. A 517, 275 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(90)90035-K
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
52. L. M. Robledo,

Sign of the overlap of Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov wave functions

. Phys. Rev. C 79, 021302 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.021302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
53. G.F. Bertsch and L.M. Robledo,

Symmetry restoration in Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov based theories

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 042505 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.042505
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
54. P. A. Butler,

Octupole collectivity in nuclei

. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 43, 073002 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/7/073002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
55. M. Borrajo, T.R. Rodríguez, J.L. Egido,

Symmetry conserving configuration mixing method with cranked states

. Phys. Lett. B 746, 341 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.05.030
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
56. A. Belley, J.M. Yao, B. Bally et al.,

Ab initio uncertainty quantification of neutrinoless double-beta decay in 76Ge

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 182502 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.182502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
57. I. Wiedenhöver, R.V.F. Janssens, G. Hackman et al.,

Octupole correlations in the Pu isotopes: From vibration to static deformation? Phys

. Rev. Lett. 83, 2143 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2143
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
58. R.H. Parker, M.R. Dietrich, M.R. Kalita et al.,

First measurement of the atomic electric dipole moment of 225Ra

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 233002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.233002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
59. T. E. Chupp, P. Fierlinger, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf et al.,

Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
Footnote

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.