logo

Triggering highly nonlinear responses in 229Th nuclei with an intense laser

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT

Triggering highly nonlinear responses in 229Th nuclei with an intense laser

Xiao-Jun Liu
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.36, No.2Article number 20Published in print Feb 2025Available online 09 Jan 2025
17301

In a recent paper published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 152503 (2024), H. Zhang, T. Li, and X. Wang predicted that modern intense lasers can induce highly nonlinear responses in the 229Th nucleus for the first time, which is an astonishing effect of light-nucleus interactions. This phenomenon is underpinned by two key factors: (1) the presence of a very low-lying nuclear excited state and (2) a nuclear hyperfine mixing effect that significantly enhances light-nucleus coupling. The resulting highly nonlinear responses facilitate efficient nuclear excitation and enable coherent light emission from the nucleus, resulting in high harmonic generation. 229Th presents a promising platform for advancements in both laser-nuclear physics and nuclear clock development. The pioneering work by Zhang et al. marks a new frontier in light-matter interactions.

Lasers with intensities exceeding 1013 W/cm2 can induce highly nonlinear responses in atoms and molecules, resulting in novel phenomena, such as multiphoton and above-threshold ionization [1, 2], nonsequential double ionization [3-5], high harmonic generation [6, 7], and laser-induced electron diffraction [8-10]. A particularly significant outcome of intense laser-atom interactions is the generation of attosecond (1 as = 10-18 s) pulses [11, 12], which is a breakthrough that achieved the 2023 Nobel Prize.

The ability to induce highly nonlinear responses in atoms arises when the laser-atom interaction energy EI becomes a non-negligible fraction of the atomic transition energy ΔE. The former is the product of the atomic transition moment D and laser field amplitude E0. Thus, the following ratio serves as an indicator of whether highly nonlinear responses can be initiated: η=EIΔEDE0ΔE. (1) If η1, the response remains linear, while if η1, highly nonlinear responses can occur. For atoms with D~1 a.u. (atomic units) and ΔE1 a.u., a laser intensity of 1013 W/cm2 (equivalent to E00.01 a.u.) results in η0.01, which is typically sufficient to trigger highly nonlinear responses.

The induction of highly nonlinear responses in atomic nuclei presents a significant challenge. First, a nucleus is approximately five orders of magnitude smaller than an atom, resulting in correspondingly smaller transition moment values D. Second, the nuclear transition energy ΔE is typically five orders of magnitude greater than that of atoms. Consequently, to achieve a similar η value for nuclei, the laser field amplitude E0 must be ten orders of magnitude higher. This translates to a required laser intensity of 1033 W/cm2, which is prohibitively high and far beyond current technological capabilities (with the latest intensity record being 1023 W/cm2 [13]).

However, this estimation applies to “typical” nuclei, whereas Nature provides certain exceptional cases. One such nucleus is thorium-229 (229Th), which features an extremely low-lying excited state just 8.4 eV above the nuclear ground state. The minimized transition energy of the 229Th nucleus is ΔE0.3 a.u., which significantly increases η. However, the transition moment remains very small at D107 a.u. Even at the highest currently achievable laser intensity of 1023 W/cm2 (equivalent to E0103 a.u.), the resulting η104 is still insufficient to trigger highly nonlinear responses.

The second key element is the nuclear hyperfine mixing (NHM) effect. An inner-orbital electron generates a strong electromagnetic field at the nucleus site, causing mixing between nuclear states. This effect has significant implications for the 229Th nucleus. The lifetime of the isomeric state for the bare nucleus is of the order of 103 s. In contrast, this lifetime significantly decreases by five orders of magnitude to 10-2 s for the hydrogenlike ionic state, where the 1s electron contributes to the NHM effect. This reduction occurs because the NHM effect enhances the coupling between the nucleus and light field, effectively modifying the transition moment from D to D=D+bμe. Here, b0.03 is the mixing coefficient, and μe is the magnetic moment of the 1s electron. The additional term bμe104 a.u. is approximately three orders of magnitude larger than D, highlighting the substantial influence of NHM on the nuclear dynamics.

As the transition moment increases to D104 a.u., it can be seen that η becomes ~0.1 for a laser intensity of 1023 W/cm2, which is sufficient to trigger highly nonlinear responses in 229Th. This was recently confirmed by numerical results obtained by Zhang et al. [14].

Figure 1(a) illustrates the nuclear excitation probability as a function of laser intensity for both the bare nucleus (Th90+) and hydrogenlike ion (Th89+). In the case of Th89+, the nuclear excited state splits into two levels due to hyperfine splitting, and the excitation probabilities for both levels (with total angular momentum F=1 and 2) are displayed. For Th89+, the excitation probabilities deviate from linearity at intensities above 1017 W/cm2, exhibiting highly nonlinear characteristics and rapidly climbing to the 10% level at an intensity of 1021 W/cm2. In contrast, for the bare nucleus Th90+, the excitation probability remains linearly dependent on laser intensity all the way up to 1023 W/cm2, indicating that the response is still linear and fails to evoke nonlinear effects. Moreover, the absolute value of the excitation probability remains relatively small.

Fig. 1
(Color online) (a) Nuclear isomeric excitation probability as a function of laser intensity for the bare nucleus (Th90+) and hydrogenlike ion (Th89+). In the Th89+ case, the nuclear excited state splits into two levels. (b) High harmonic spectra generated from the laser-driven Th89+ system under four different laser intensities. Figures adapted from Ref. [14]
pic

With highly nonlinear responses triggered in Th89+, radiation is emitted at multiple frequencies, which are the high-order harmonics of the laser frequency, as illustrated in Fig. 1(b) for four different laser intensities. The third and fifth harmonics appear at intensity 1018 W/cm2. As the intensity increases, higher-order harmonics become evident, with the 31st harmonic observable at 1021 W/cm2.

The potential for inducing highly nonlinear responses in nuclei presents several important applications: (1) Efficient excitation and manipulation of nuclei — an excitation probability of 10% per nucleus per laser pulse is remarkable, paving the way for further quantum-state manipulation. (2) High harmonic generation as a novel mechanism for nucleus-based coherent light emission, which is distinct from the long-sought nuclear laser concept based on population inversion [15]. (3) High harmonic spectra as a new spectroscopic technique for extracting nuclear information — these spectra encode valuable nuclear data, such as the nuclear transition moment, which can be decoded through detailed analysis.

Beyond serving as a valuable platform for studying laser-nucleus interactions, the 229Th nucleus holds immense promise for the construction of nuclear clocks. A peculiar low-energy nuclear transition in 229Th has been proposed as the basis for nuclear clocks [16], offering distinct advantages over atomic clocks. Substantial progress has been made in recent years [17-24].

Here, I highlight the recent advancements in China: (1) Vacuum Ultraviolet (VUV) Light Sources: Our group in Wuhan has developed a VUV frequency comb that provides narrowband (< 30 MHz) VUV light centered at 148 nm [25]. Additionally, Xiao et al. at Tsinghua University proposed a VUV laser scheme based on four-wave mixing in cadmium vapor [26]. (2) Th-Doped Crystals: Gong et al. investigated various Th-doped wide-bandgap crystals as potential materials for building solid-state nuclear clocks [27, 28]. (3) 229Th Production: Ma et al. proposed generating 229Th through accelerated 232Th and neutron knocking-out reactions [29], while Wu et al. suggested using γ rays to remove three neutrons from 232Th [30]. (4) Isomeric Excitation Methods: A variety of theoretical methods for isomeric excitation have been explored, including laser-driven electron recollision [31], electron bridge mechanisms [32, 33], inelastic electron scattering [34], laser-cluster interactions [35], proton Coulomb excitation [36], and electron capture [37].

In conclusion, 229Th stands out as a promising platform for both laser-nuclear physics and nuclear clock development, with substantial advancements already achieved and further progress anticipated.

References
1.G. S. Voronov and N. B. Delone,

Ionization of the xenon atom by the electric field of ruby laser emission

. JETP Lett. 1, 66 (1965).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2.P. Agostini, F. Fabre, G. Mainfray et al.,

Free-free transitions following six-photon ionization of xenon atoms

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1127 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1127
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3.D.N. Fittinghoff, P.R. Bolton, B. Chang et al.,

Observation of nonsequential double ionization of helium with optical tunneling

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2642 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2642
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4.B. Walker, B. Sheehy, L. F. DiMauro et al.,

Precision measurement of strong field double ionization of helium

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1227 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1227
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5.W. Becker, X. J. Liu, P. J. Ho et al.,

Theories of photoelectron correlation in laser-driven multiple atomic ionization

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1011 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1011
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6.A. McPherson, G. Gibson, H. Jara et al.,

Studies of multiphoton production of vacuum-ultraviolet radiation in the rare gases

. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 595 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.4.000595
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7.M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X.F. Li et al.,

Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases

. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 21, L31 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/21/3/001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8.C. I. Blaga, J. Xu, A. D. DiChiara et al.,

Imaging ultrafast molecular dynamics with laser-induced electron diffraction

. Nature 483, 194 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10820
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9.B. Wolter, M. G. Pullen, A.-T. Le et al.,

Ultrafast electron diffraction imaging of bond breaking in di-ionized acetylene

. Science 354, 308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah342
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10.W. Quan, X. Hao, X. Hu et al.,

Laser-induced inelastic diffraction from strong-field double ionization

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 243203 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.243203
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11.P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger et al.,

Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation

. Science 292, 1689 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059413
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12.M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, Ch. Spielmann et al.,

Attosecond metrology

. Nature 414, 509 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35107000
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13.J. W. Yoon, Y. G. Kim, I. W. Choi et al.,

Realization of laser intensity over 1023 W/cm2

. Optica 8, 630 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.420520
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14.H. Zhang, T. Li, X. Wang,

Highly nonlinear light-nucleus interaction

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 152503 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.152503
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15.G. C. Baldwin, J. C. Solem,

Recoilless gamma-ray lasers

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1085 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.69.1085
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16.E. Peik, C. Tamm,

Nuclear laser spectroscopy of the 3.5 eV transition in Th-229

. EPL 61, 181 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2003-00210-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17.J. Thielking, M. V. Okhapkin, P. G?owacki et al.,

Laser spectroscopic characterization of the nuclear-clock isomer 229mTh

. Nature 556, 321 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0011-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18.B. Seiferle, L. von der Wense, P. V. Bilous et al.

Energy of the 229Th nuclear clock transition

. Nature 573, 243 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1533-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19.T. Masuda, A. Yoshimi, A. Fujieda et al.

X-ray pumping of the 229Th nuclear clock isomer

. Nature 573, 238 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1542-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20.S. Kraemer, J. Moens, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis et al.

Observation of the radiative decay of the 229Th nuclear clock isomer

. Nature 617, 706 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05894-z
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21.A. Yamaguchi, Y. Shigekawa, H. Haba et al.,

Laser spectroscopy of triply charged 229Th isomer for a nuclear clock

. Nature 629, 62 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07296-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22.J. Tiedau, M. V. Okhapkin, K. Zhang et al.,

Laser excitation of the Th-229 nucleus

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 182501 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.182501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23.R. Elwell, C. Schneider, J. Jeet et al.,

Laser excitation of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition in a solid-state host

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 013201 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.013201
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24.C. Zhang, T. Ooi, J. S. Higgins et al.

Frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition and the 87Sr atomic clock

. Nature 633, 63 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07839-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25.M. F. Zhu, Z. R. Xiao, H. Z. Zhang et al.,

Measurement of the linewidth of a home-built vacuum ultraviolet comb by frequency comb spectroscopy on NO2

. Opt. Lett. 49, 3757 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.519912
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26.Q. Xiao, G. Penyazkov, R.H. Yu et al.,

Proposal for the generation of continuous-wave vacuum ultraviolet laser light for Th-229 isomer precision spectroscopy

. arXiv:2406.16841.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27.Q. Gong, C. Zhao, S. Tao et al.,

Thorium-doped lithium fluoride single crystal: A potential promising candidate for solid state nuclear optical clock materials

. Adv. Opt. Mater. 11, 2202327 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202202327
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28.Q. Gong, S. Tao, S. Li et al.,

Feasibility and potential of a thorium-doped barium-lithium-fluoride single crystal as a candidate for solid-state nuclear optical clock material

. Phys. Rev. A 109, 033109 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.033109
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29.X. Ma, W. Wen, Z. Huang et al.,

Proposal for precision determination of 7.8 eV isomeric state in 229Th at heavy ion storage ring

. Phys. Scr. T166, 014012 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2015/T166/014012
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30.D. Wu, H. Lan, J. Liu et al.,

Ultra-short lifetime isomer studies from photonuclear reactions using laser driven ultra-intense γ-ray

. arXiv:2402.15187.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31.W. Wang, J. Zhou, B. Liu et al.,

Exciting the isomeric 229Th nuclear state via laser-driven electron recollision

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 052501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.052501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32.N.Q. Cai, G.Q. Zhang, C.B. Fu et al.,

Populating 229mTh via two-photon electronic bridge mechanism, Nucl

. Sci. Tech. 32, 59 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00900-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33.L. Li, Z. Li, C. Wang et al.,

Scheme for the excitation of thorium-229 nuclei based on electronic bridge excitation

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 24 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01169-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34.H. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Wang,

Nuclear excitation cross section of 229Th via inelastic electron scattering

. Phys. Rev. C 106, 044604 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.044604
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35.J. Qi, H. Zhang, X. Wang,

Isomeric excitation of 229Th in laser-heated clusters

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 112501 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.112501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36.T. Li, H. Zhang, X. Wang,

Theory of Coulomb excitation of the 229Th nucleus by protons

. Phys. Rev. C 108, L041602 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L041602
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37.J. Zhao, A. Palffy, C. H. Keitel et al.,

Efficient production of 229mTh via nuclear excitation by electron capture

. Phys. Rev. C 110, 014330 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.014330
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar