1 INTRODUCTION
To obtain the monoenergetic neutron sources, standard source items[1, 2] should be available for the on-site calibration of neutron radiation monitoring instrument and the neutron tubes, which have advantages of low cost, easy protection and maintenance, light weight and simple operation(regarded as one of source items with wide popularity) [3-5]. However, disadvantages of launching at 4π angle of neutron sources and the single energy point can restrict the application of neutron tubes to on-site calibration. To solve this problem, Monte Carol method was adopted in this paper to analyze the effects of interactions between typical materials and different energy neutrons. With the obtained optimal shielding structure of neutron sources from the neutron tubes, a tapered alignment filtration system was designed to restrict the launching angle. Then we obtained the monoenergetic neutrons with different energies to realize “multiple energies from one source” in the neutron tubes.
2 THEORETICAL ANALYSIS
D-T neutron tubes are mainly characterized by no radiation without powers, outgoing neutron being the monoenergetic neutrons approximately [6], average energy of 14.1 MeV and isotropy of neutron outgoing. To obtain the monoenergetic neutrons, it is necessary to design a layer of shielding filtration structure to filter the neutrons with approximate isotropy and transfer them into monoenergetic neutrons. First of all, shielding structure studies should be carried out. Heavy materials are used to moderate fast neutrons for they have larger inelastic scattering section [7, 8]. Hydrogenous materials with larger elastic scattering section can carry out further slowing down to decrease the neutron energy to the thermal neutron zone. And the thermal neutrons can be absorbed through nuclear reaction (n, x) which retains the neutrons inside the shield, so as to achieve the goal of shielding. Normally, the absorption section of boron is relatively large [9], but α charged particles and secondary γ ray will be generated at the same time if boron is used as shielding materials. The range of α ray is short and easily shielded. Finally, the heavy metal materials, such as lead, are applicable to realize the target of shielding γ ray [10-12]. Therefore, it is proposed to set four layers of shielding material to shield the fast neutrons which are produced by neutron tubes, as shown in Fig. 1.
-201605/1001-8042-27-05-004/alternativeImage/1001-8042-27-05-004-F001.jpg)
3 DESIGN AND VERIFICATION OF OPTIMAL SHIELDING STRUCTURE
3.1 Structure Design
Since the average energy of outgoing neutron is 14.1 MeV, metal materials like copper (Cu), ferrum (Fe) and tungsten (W) can be chosen to slow down and transfer 14.1 MeV into intermediate and low-energy neutrons [13-15]. At this moment, hydrogenous materials with larger elastic scattering cross-section such as polyethylene and water can be selected to further slow down the neutrons [16]. And the third layer is neutron absorption material. Boron has relatively large absorption cross sections, so B4C can be selected to absorb the thermal neutrons [17, 18], but in this process, a large amount of secondary γ rays will occur [19, 20]. To reduce as many as γ rays, lead is proposed to absorb γ photons to obtain the optimal structure. To create enough space inside the shield, it is planned to adopt cuboid structure for the shield and there is a cuboid cavity with a dimension of 5 cm×5 cm×240 cm in the shield (shown in Fig. 2 without the red tapered alignment hole) considering the structure size of the neutron tubes (investigated in this paper).
-201605/1001-8042-27-05-004/alternativeImage/1001-8042-27-05-004-F002.jpg)
3.2 Simulation Verification
To acquire the thickness of all layers of shielding materials, MCNP program will be employed to simulate layer by layer. The materials with different thicknesses and types are used for combined comparison. The materials mentioned by former section at first three layers are typed into MCNP software simultaneously. The types of materials at the first and second layer and the thickness of materials at the third layer are changed. The corresponding changing curves of neutron fluence varies with energy transformation are displayed in Fig. 3. It can be seen that the neutron fluence decreases to below 0.025%. Accordingly, six combining schemes of the first three layers of materials can be obtained.
-201605/1001-8042-27-05-004/alternativeImage/1001-8042-27-05-004-F003.jpg)
In order to sharply alleviate the influence of γ ray on the neutron radiation field, lead is proposed to be used as the shielding materials for the third layer. Under the combing schemes of the first three layers, the variation of γ relative fluence with the thickness of Pb is displayed in Fig. 4. According to Fig. 4, it is suitable to determine the thickness of lead shielding layer as 10 cm.
-201605/1001-8042-27-05-004/alternativeImage/1001-8042-27-05-004-F004.jpg)
4 DESIGN AND VERIFICATIONOF ALINMENT STRUCTURE
The D-T neutron tube excites neutrons with average energy of 14.1 MeV at 4π angle direction. To realize the result of “multiple energies from one source” of neutron source, it is necessary to design a neutron alignment filtration structure. General neutron alignment structures include cylindrical outlet structure, multitube outlet structure and tapered outlet structure.
The neutron shielding filtration system in this paper will be applied to calibration research, so outgoing neutron should cover the whole detector zone. Considering that cylindrical outlet structure and multitube outlet structure have relatively small coverage, thus this paper adopts tapered outlet structure as the neutron alignment structure. In the meanwhile, due to neutrons with different energies having different cross sections on the materials, after the neutrons (from the neutron tubes) are slowed down and absorbed by filtration mediums, neutron energy can gather at a certain segment, thus forming quasi monoenergetic neutrons.
4.1 14.1 MeV monoenergetic neutron
4.1.1 Design
The neutron source of D-T neutron tube can outgo the neutrons with average energy of 14.1 MeV and the neutron energy range is relatively narrow, so it can be approximately viewed as monoenergetic neutron source. To obtain 14.1 MeV quasi monoenergetic neutrons, a tapered alignment hole should be designed on the shielding structure and 14.1 MeV monoenergetic neutrons can be directly obtained without any shielding. In consideration of the size of shielding structure, the scheme of W (35 cm) + (CH)n (10 cm) + B4C (0.l cm) + Pb (15 cm) is taken as the example to design the alignment structure. The tapered alignment hole has an axial symmetry structure which guarantees that the tapered alignment projection can completely cover the monitor at the location (1m from the source center), with a taper angle of 25°, and the alignment structure is displayed in Fig. 2.
But due to scattering effects of various materials, a lot of scattering neutrons will generate. The primary scattering neutrons include two parts. The first part includes the scattering neutrons created by interaction between the innermost shielding materials and 14.1 MeV neutrons; the other part contains the scattering neutrons produced by interaction of alignment hole inner surface and neutrons as well as the neutrons leaked from the alignment hole inner surface in the transportation process of shielding layer.
In addition, through simulation of variation of scattering neutrons with material thickness, W shows good scattering effect on 14.1 MeV neutrons. To reduce as many as impacts of scattering neutrons, a kind of materials with weak scattering effect on 14.1 MeV neutrons is added to the innermost shielding layer. Based on the simulation result, at the innermost shielding layer, a layer of boracic polyethylene with a thickness of 10 cm is added to reduce generation of scattering neutrons; on the tapered alignment hole inner surface, the optimal thickness of boracic polyethylene is 25 cm . In this case, except reducing the scattering effect, the boracic polyethylene can reduce the leaking neutrons to enter the alignment hole; if boracic polyethylene filtration layer is added to the alignment hole, due to serious scattering factors, it has worse result than the case where boracic polyethylene is not added. Thus it is only necessary to add boracic polyethylene to the innermost shielding layer and alignment structure inner surface to obtain 14.1 MeV monoenergetic neutrons.
4.1.2 Verification
A shielding hall in Xi’an is adopted as the background to simulate the filtration effects of different design schemes. The average neutrons and γ energy spectrums within the measurement zone with radium of 50cm and interval of 1m at a distance of 1~9m from the source are recorded. It is assumed that the yield of neutron tube is 5.0×108 s-1 (the yield of neutron tube in this paper is not less than 5.0 × 108 s-1). The shielding filtration scheme is used to obtain 14.1 MeV neutrons, and the neutrons and γ energy spectrums are displayed in Fig. 5 (a) and (b).
-201605/1001-8042-27-05-004/alternativeImage/1001-8042-27-05-004-F005.jpg)
Figure 6 shows that this design scheme is able to obtain 14.1 MeV neutrons with good monochromaticit. With increased radial distance, reducing of neutrons and γ relative fluence will be fast. The neutron energy spectral patterns at different locations are similar basically. The neutron monoenergetic peak is 14.1 MeV while γ ray has some influence.
-201605/1001-8042-27-05-004/alternativeImage/1001-8042-27-05-004-F006.jpg)
4.2 0.18 MeV monoenergetic neutron
4.2.1 Design
Tungsten (W) has good shielding effect on 14 MeV fast neutron and can generate a large amount of intermediate and low-energy neutrons after being slowed down; B4C has good shielding performance on the thermal neutrons, and when B4C has a thickness of 0.2cm, it can absorb all thermal neutrons. To obtain monoenergetic neutrons with energy of about 1 MeV, W material layer can be combined with 0.2cm B4C to filter and absorb 14 MeV fast neutrons. Through simulation of MCNP software, the result shows that with the increase of W layer thickness, high-energy 14 MeV neutrons are gradually reduced and intermediate and low energy neutrons are gradually increasing. When the thickness of W layer is 30cm, the ratio of intermediate and low energy neutrons and high-energy neutrons is maximized and optimal monoenergetic neutrons can be obtained with energy peak of 0.18 MeV.
4.2.2 Verification
The shielding filtration scheme is used to obtain 0.18 MeV neutrons, and the neutrons and γ energy spectrums are displayed in Fig. 6 (a) and (b). This figure suggests that this design scheme can obtain 0.18MeV neutrons with good monochromaticity. With increased radial distance, reducing of neutrons and relative γ fluence will be fast. The neutron energy spectral patterns at different locations are similar basically. The neutron monoenergetic peak is 0.18 MeV while γ ray has some influence.
4.3. Thermal Neutrons
4.3.1 Design
Polyethylene has good shielding performance for the intermediate and low energy neutrons below 1 MeV, while has bad shielding performance for thermal neutrons. It is suggested to combine W and polyethylene as the shielding materials to obtain thermal neutrons.
The result of MCNP software simulation shows that with increased thickness of polyethylene, outgoing neutrons gradually reduce, but the neutron energy spectrums resolution gradually decreases. When the thickness of polyethylene is 4cm and W is 30cm, we can obtain the thermal neutron energy spectrums with best monochromaticity.
4.3.2 Verification
The shielding filtration scheme is used to obtain the thermal neutron structure, and the neutrons and γ energy spectrums are displayed in Fig. 7 (a) and (b). According to the figures, we can find that this design scheme can obtain thermal neutrons with good monochromaticity. With increased radial distance, reducing of neutrons and elative γ fluence will be fast. The neutron energy spectral patterns at different locations are similar basically. The neutron energy decreases below eV order while γ ray has some influence.
-201605/1001-8042-27-05-004/alternativeImage/1001-8042-27-05-004-F007.jpg)
4.4 Discussions about γ ray influence
Monoenergetic outgoing points of 14.1 MeV, 0.18 MeV and thermal neutrons can be obtained by the tapered alignment filtration structure. However, some γ rays are produced by the filtration materials meanwhile. Monoenergetic performance will deteriorate if shielding structure used to reduce γ influence. To resolve the contradiction between obtaining monoenergetic neutrons and reducing γ influence, accurate γ ray monitoring equipment is suggested to apply for γ measurement during on-site calibration.γ influence can be reduced after a revision of neutron measured value. To achieve the requirement of on-site calibration, the appropriate distance between calibration position and source core is suggested due to the different neutron yield versus radial distance.
5 CONCLUSION
MCNP software is applied to simulate the effects of typical shielding materials and different energy neutrons. Through comparison of shielding effects by changing different material combinations, the optimal scheme can be obtained. On this base, a tapered alignment filtration structure is designed and the filtration effects of different materials are simulated to obtain the filtration schemes of monoenergetic outgoing points of 14.1 MeV, 0.18 MeV and thermal neutrons. The purpose of “multiple energies from one source” is achieved to provide reference data and technical support for on-site calibration technology research on radiation monitoring, as well as the technical reference for various neutron tubes application researches.
The neutron detection efficiency of NE213 detectors measured by means of 252Cf source
. Nucl Instrum Methods A, 1989, 274: 217-221.Pulse Neutron logging
. Coal Geol Expl, 1979, 4: 69-76. (in Chinese)Research of High Yield D-T Neutron Tube
.Study of the pulsed working characteristics of the penning ion source for neutron tubes
. Nucl Sci Tech, 2000, 11:150-154.Analysis of neutron attenuation in boron-alloyed stainless steel with neutron radiography and JEN-3 gauge
. Nucl Mater, 2005, 341: 189-200.Study on preparation of composite plates with neutron shielding function
. Chem Eng, 2009, 23: 76-70. (in Chinese)Mechanical properties of UHMWPE/Sm2O3 composite shielding material
. Journal of Rare Earths, 2010, 28: 482-484. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0721(10)60269-4MCNP simulation and design of Am-Be neutron source shield. Ph.D. Thesis
,Simulation of the background of experimental end-stations and the collimator system of the CSNS back-streaming white neutron source
. Nucl Tech, 2014, 37: 100521. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2014.hjs.37.100521The Los Alamos Neutron Science Center
. Nucl Instrum Methods A, 2006, 562: 910-914. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.02.178Cern n_TOF facility: Performance report
.Simulation and verification of neutron scattering at 252Cf (D2O) neutron laboratory
. Nucl Tech, 2014, 37: 060204. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2014.hjs.37.060204Optimal design of the carbon fiber reinforcing B4C/Al neutron absorbing materials
. Nucl Tech, 2015, 38: 030605. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2015.hjs.38.030605Pulsed fast/thermal neutron analysis: a technique for explosives detection
. Talanta, 2001, 54: 459-468. doi: 10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00544M-C simulation of slow neutron attenuation in boron-containing stainless steel
. Nucl Tech, 2010, 33: 367-369. (in Chinese)Monte Carlo simulation of neutron transmission of boron-alloyed steel
. Nucl Sci, 2005, 52(1): 394-399. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2005.843638