Introduction
The synthesis and investigation of unknown superheavy elements (SHEs) can reveal the shell structure and decay properties near the predicted "island of stability" [1-5]. Over recent decades, remarkable advancements have been achieved in the synthesis of new SHEs with Z = 114–118 through fusion reactions with the 48Ca projectile and the actinide targets [6-11]. To date, modern accelerators coupled with sensitive detection techniques have made notable progress in the synthesis of new superheavy nuclei [12-20]. Despite these advances, a significant gap remains in the superheavy nuclei region, necessitating continued experimental and theoretical investigations.
For synthesizing new superheavy nuclei, the 48Ca-induced fusion reactions encounter constraints due to the limited amount of experimental feasible Bk and Cf targets. Consequently, employing combinations of Cm targets and heavier stable projectiles can be an alternative for future experiments. The mixed-Cm target material was produced by irradiating the plutonium target at the Savannah River Site, with subsequent recovery at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory [21]. With long half-lives ranging from decades to millions of years, many Pu and Cm isotopes have been extensively applied as target materials in fusion reactions aimed at synthesizing new isotopes [14, 22-37]. In 2022, the reaction 51V+248Cm was attempted to synthesize a new element with Z = 119, and the optimal reaction energy for this reaction was estimated [38]. These experiments revealed the critical influence of the target neutron excess on the maximal ER cross sections, indicating the necessity for further research into the isotopic dependence of target materials.
Based on the experimental results, a variety of theoretical models, including both the macroscopic [39-44] and the microscopic approaches [45-51], have been developed. Among these, the dinuclear system (DNS) model has been proven to be reliable in investigating the fusion-evaporation reactions [52-62]. Within the framework of the DNS model, the fusion-evaporation process is divided into three stages: initial formation of the DNS upon overcoming the Coulomb barrier by the colliding nuclei; subsequent production of a compound nucleus through nucleon transfer from the lighter projectile to the heavier target; and finally, the synthesis of a superheavy nucleus via the evaporation of neutrons by the excited compound nucleus to reach the ground state.
Experiments have revealed that the evaporation residual (ER) cross sections of fusion reactions exhibit remarkable sensitivity to the selection of the target material [14, 63]. The isotopic dependence of the target not only affects the ER cross sections for synthesizing new superheavy nuclei but also influences their decay properties and the feasibility of observation for a sufficient duration to study their chemical and physical properties. Therefore, to search for the optimal projectile-target combinations, it is necessary to investigate the isotopic dependence of the target materials. Based on the DNS model, this study discusses the isotopic dependence of the targets and investigates the potential for extending the superheavy nuclei region with Cm targets.
The remainder of this article is organized as follows: In Sect. 2, we describe the theoretical framework of the DNS model. In Sect. 3, the reliability of the DNS model is examined based on the ample experimental results of the fusion reactions 48Ca+239,240,242,244Pu, with an investigation into the influence of the target isotope on the capture, fusion, and survival stages. Additionally, the experimental results of the reactions 48Ca+245,248Cm are compared with the theoretical calculations. The combinations of the 242-248Cm target and the 45Sc, 50Ti, 51V, 54Cr, and 55Mn projectiles were investigated for extending the superheavy nuclei region with Z = 117–121, presenting the maximal ER cross sections and corresponding incident energies. The isotopic dependence of the Cm targets was discussed in detail for the capture, fusion, and survival stages. In Sect. 4, a summary of this study is provided.
Theoretical descriptions
Within the framework of the DNS model, the ER cross section as a function of the center-of-mass energy Ec.m. is calculated by summing the contributing partial waves J [64]:_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M001.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M002.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M003.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M004.png)
The Coulomb potential VC is calculated using the Wong formula [69]:_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M005.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M006.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M007.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M008.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M009.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M010.png)
The transmission probability, which represents the capacity of colliding nuclei to surpass the Coulomb barrier, is determined as:_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M011.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M012.png)
The capture cross section _2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M013.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M014.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M015.png)
For the evaporation of x neutrons, the survival probability is given by the statistical model:_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M016.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M017.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M018.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M019.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M020.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-M021.png)
Results and discussion
The isotopic dependence of the reactions with 239,240,242,244Pu targets
Given the large amount of available experimental data, Pu-based hot fusion reactions are crucial for assessing theoretical models. Typically, a higher neutron excess in the target leads to an enhanced maximal ER cross section. Figure 1 presents both experimental and theoretical maximal ER cross sections of the 3n- and 4n-emission channels for the reactions 48Ca+239,240,242,244Pu. An ascending trend was observed in both the experimental and theoretical maximal ER cross sections with an increase in the neutron number in the target. Notably, the maximal ER cross sections of the 4n-emission channel increase more rapidly than those of the 3n-emission channel as the neutron number of the target increases. To understand the isotopic dependence of the target, thorough investigations of the capture, fusion, and survival stages are required.
Figure 2(a) presents the capture cross sections of the reactions 48Ca+239,240,242,244Pu at
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-F002.jpg)
For the fusion stage, Fig. 3(a) illustrates the fusion probabilities for the reactions 48Ca+239,240,242,244Pu at
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-F003.jpg)
Within the framework of the dinuclear system model, the survival process is independent of the formation of the compound nucleus. The isotopic dependence of the target primarily affects the neutron richness of the formed compound nucleus. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) display the survival probabilities of the compound nuclei formed via the reactions 48Ca+239,240,242,244Pu in the 3n- and 4n-emission channels at different
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-F004.jpg)
Notably, the variation in the survival probabilities in the 3n-emission channel is approximately an order of magnitude, whereas in the 4n-emission channel, the variation is approximately two orders of magnitude. This can be attributed to the influence of the fission barrier height
The synthesis of new superheavy nuclei with 242-248Cm targets
In Fig. 5, the comparative analysis between calculated and experimental results is extended to the reactions 48Ca+245Cm→293-xnLv+xn and 48Ca+248Cm→296-xnLv+xn. The theoretical results for both reactions are in agreement with the experimental results in the 3n-emission channel. For the 4n-emission channel, the calculated ER cross sections were consistent with the experimental results for the reaction 48Ca+245Cm, while the calculated maximal ER cross section for the reaction 48Ca+248Cm exceeded the currently available experimental results. Investigations into the Pu- and Cm-based reactions prove not only the reliability of the DNS model but also its potential in identifying the optimal projectile-target combinations for the synthesis of new superheavy nuclei with Cm targets.
In Table 1, the optimal reaction systems, alongside the corresponding Ec.m.,
| Isotope | Reaction | Ec.m. (MeV) | |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 284Ts | 242Cm(45Sc,3n) | 209.0 | 38.0 | |
| 285Ts | 243Cm(45Sc,3n) | 205.7 | 36.0 | |
| 286Ts | 244Cm(45Sc,3n) | 204.6 | 36.0 | |
| 287Ts | 245Cm(45Sc,3n) | 202.2 | 35.0 | |
| 288Ts | 246Cm(45Sc,3n) | 202.0 | 36.0 | |
| 289Ts | 247Cm(45Sc,3n) | 199.7 | 35.0 | |
| 290Ts | 248Cm(45Sc,3n) | 200.3 | 37.0 | |
| 289Og | 242Cm(50Ti,3n) | 226.1 | 36.0 | |
| 290Og | 243Cm(50Ti,3n) | 224.3 | 35.0 | |
| 291Og | 244Cm(50Ti,3n) | 223.5 | 35.0 | |
| 292Og | 245Cm(50Ti,3n) | 221.4 | 34.0 | |
| 293Og | 247Cm(50Ti,4n) | 224.8 | 39.0 | |
| 295Og | 248Cm(50Ti,3n) | 220.0 | 35.0 | |
| 290119 | 242Cm(51V,3n) | 237.0 | 36.0 | |
| 291119 | 243Cm(51V,3n) | 234.9 | 35.0 | |
| 292119 | 244Cm(51V,3n) | 233.9 | 35.0 | |
| 293119 | 245Cm(51V,3n) | 230.8 | 33.0 | |
| 294119 | 246Cm(51V,3n) | 231.7 | 35.0 | |
| 295119 | 247Cm(51V,3n) | 228.8 | 33.0 | |
| 296119 | 248Cm(51V,3n) | 230.0 | 35.0 | |
| 293120 | 242Cm(54Cr,3n) | 248.6 | 37.0 | |
| 294120 | 243Cm(54Cr,3n) | 246.9 | 36.0 | |
| 295120 | 244Cm(54Cr,3n) | 246.7 | 37.0 | |
| 296120 | 245Cm(54Cr,3n) | 245.0 | 36.0 | |
| 297120 | 246Cm(54Cr,3n) | 244.1 | 36.0 | |
| 298120 | 247Cm(54Cr,3n) | 242.3 | 35.0 | |
| 299120 | 248Cm(54Cr,3n) | 242.1 | 34.0 | |
| 294121 | 242Cm(55Mn,3n) | 259.1 | 38.0 | |
| 295121 | 243Cm(55Mn,3n) | 256.9 | 37.0 | |
| 296121 | 244Cm(55Mn,3n) | 255.8 | 37.0 | |
| 297121 | 245Cm(55Mn,3n) | 253.6 | 36.0 | |
| 298121 | 246Cm(55Mn,3n) | 253.7 | 37.0 | |
| 299121 | 247Cm(55Mn,3n) | 251.5 | 36.0 | |
| 300121 | 248Cm(55Mn,3n) | 250.7 | 36.0 | |
The isotopic dependence of the reactions with 242-248Cm targets
To further investigate the isotopic dependence of the 242-248Cm target, the calculated maximal ER cross sections of the Cm-based reactions in the 3n-emission channel are plotted in Fig. 6. An increasing trend in the maximal ER cross sections was observed as the neutron excess in the Cm target increased. This trend is accompanied by an apparent odd-even stagger, indicating the advantage of neutron-rich Cm targets with odd neutron numbers. To further discuss this phenomenon, the capture, fusion, and survival stages are discussed in Fig. 7.
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-F006.jpg)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-F007.jpg)
In Fig. 7(a), the capture cross sections of the reaction systems with 45Sc, 50Ti, 51V, 54Cr, 55Mn projectiles and 242-248Cm targets are presented. Consistent with the aforementioned discussion, the capture cross sections displayed a decreasing trend as the neutron number of the target increased. For 45Sc-induced reactions, the isotopic effect on the capture was relatively significant. For the other reactions, the capture cross section exhibited considerably less variation. Figure 7(b) presents the fusion probabilities of the corresponding reactions. A significant decline in the fusion probabilities was observed between the 45Sc- and 50Ti-induced reactions, as well as the 51V- and 54Cr-induced reactions. This can be ascribed to the varying mass asymmetry values influenced by the projectile mass numbers. In Fig. 7(b), a decreasing trend in the fusion probabilities with an increasing neutron number of the target can be observed. This isotopic-dependent decreasing trend in the fusion probability, along with the same trend discussed in Fig. 3, can be attributed to the deviation in the neutron number of the target from the closed neutron shell [89]. Furthermore, an odd-even effect can also be noted, which can be attributed to the pairing effect in the fusion stage.
In Fig. 7(c), the survival probabilities of the corresponding reactions in the 3n-emission channel are presented. As the neutron number of the formed compound nucleus approaches the predicted closed neutron shell, N = 184, the stability of the compound nucleus is enhanced, leading to ascending survival probabilities with increasing neutron excess in the target. The odd-even effect is also significant, which primarily arises from the influence of the variance of the fission barrier. For reactions synthesizing superheavy nuclei with Z = 117, the survival probability increases rapidly as the neutron number of the target increases. This trend can be attributed to the neutron number of the formed compound nuclei approaching the semi-closed neutron shell at N = 178. It was also observed that for reactions involving even-even projectiles such as 50Ti and 54Cr, the odd-even effect was suppressed. This reduction in the odd-even effect can be ascribed to the pairing effects. It is evident that, in the synthesis of new superheavy nucleus via the 242-248Cm targets, the isotopic dependence on the maximal ER cross section mainly arises from the survival stages. Here, the odd-even effect, coupled with the high neutron excess of the target, strongly enhances the stability of the formed compound nucleus. Consequently, the 247Cm target is favorable for the future synthesis of superheavy nuclei.
Summary
In this study, the predictive reliability of the DNS model on isotopic dependence was examined using experimental results for the reactions 48Ca+239,240,242,244Pu. The impact of the target isotope is discussed in the capture, fusion, and survival stages, revealing a strong enhancement in the survival probabilities owing to the influence of the fission barrier height. The feasibility of applying the 242-248Cm targets and the stable projectiles 45Sc, 50Ti, 51V, 54Cr, 55Mn for synthesizing new superheavy nuclei 284-290Ts, 289-293,295Og, 290-296119, 293-299120, 294-300121 is investigated. To synthesize new superheavy elements with Z = 119–121, the optimal reaction systems are predicted to be the reactions 51V+245Cm → 293119+3n, 54Cr+247Cm → 298120+3n, and 55Mn+247Cm → 299121+3n, with the maximal ER cross sections of 144 fb, 0.877 fb, and 0.052 fb, respectively. The isotopic dependence of the maximal ER cross sections of the 242-248Cm-based reactions was investigated in detail, indicating that the isotopic dependence of the Cm targets mainly arises from the survival stages. This is attributed to the enhanced stability of the formed compound nuclei, influenced by a higher neutron number when approaching the predicted neutron shell closure N=184. The odd-even effect coupled with the high neutron excess renders the 247Cm target promising for the future synthesis of superheavy nuclei.
Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM(2012)
. At. Data. Nucl. Data Tables 109-110, 1–204 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002Shape coexistence and triaxiality in the superheavy nuclei
. Nature 433, 705–709 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03336Shell corrections of superheavy nuclei in self-consistent calculations
. Phys. Rev. C 61,Nuclear structure features of very heavy and superheavy nuclei-tracing quantum mechanics towards the ’island of stability’
. Phys. Scr. 92(8),Possibility of reaching the predicted center of the “island of stability” via the radioactive beam-induced fusion reactions
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 161 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01542-xSynthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116 in the 249Cf and 245Cm+48Ca fusion reactions
. Phys. Rev. C 74,Synthesis of nuclei of the superheavy element 114 in reactions induced by 48Ca
. Nature 400, 242 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/22281Investigation of the 243Am+ 48 Ca reaction products previously observed in the experiments on elements 113, 115, and 117
. Phy. Rev. C 87,Observation of the decay of 292116
. Phy. Rev. C 63,Synthesis of a new element with atomic number Z = 117
. Phy. Rev. Lett. 104,Progress in transport models of heavy-ion collisions for the synthesis of superheavy nuclei
. Nucl. Tech 46, 137-145 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.080014Discovery of the new isotope 251Lr: Impact of the hexacontetrapole deformation on single-proton orbital energies near the Z=100 deformed shell gap
. Phys. Rev. C 106,Experiment on the synthesis of element 113 in the reaction 209Bi (70Zn, n) 278113
. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 73, 2593 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.73.2593Super-heavy element research
. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78(3),Superheavy nuclei from 48Ca-induced reactions
. Nucl. Phys. A 944, 62–98 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.07.003Discovery of isotopes of elements with Z ≥ 100
. At. Data. Nucl. Data Tables. 99(3), 312–344 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2012.03.003Observation of the superheavy nuclide 271Ds
. Chin. Phys. Lett. 29(1),New isotope 286Mc produced in the 243Am+48Ca reaction
. Phys. Rev. C 106,Synthesis of superheavy elements by cold fusion
. Radiochim. Acta 99, 405–428 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2011.1854Progress on the synthesis of superheavy nuclei
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 204 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01781-6Recovery of mark-18a (mk-18a) target materials: Program management plan. Tech. rep.
,Experiments on the synthesis of superheavy nuclei 284Fl and 285Fl in the 239,240Pu+48Ca reactions
. Phys. Rev. C 92,Neutron-deficient superheavy nuclei obtained in the 240Pu+48Ca reaction
. Phys. Rev. C 97,Investigation of 48Ca-induced reactions with 242Pu and 238U targets at the jinr superheavy element factory
. Phys. Rev. C 106,Independent verification of element 114 production in the 48Ca+242Pu reaction
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103,New superheavy element isotopes: 242Pu(48Ca,5n)285114
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105,First superheavy element experiments at the GSI recoil separator TASCA: The production and decay of element 114 in the 244Pu(48Ca,3-4n) reaction
. Phys. Rev. C 83,Analysis of excitation functions in Cm(C, xn)No reactions
. Phys. Rev. 172, 1232–1238 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.172.1232Excitation functions for production of rf isotopes in the 248Cm +18O reaction
. Phys. Rev. C 88,Status and prospects of heavy element nuclear chemistry research at jaeri
. J. Nucl. Radiochem. Sci. 3(1), 129 (2002). https://doi.org/10.14494/jnrs2000.3.129Production of 262Db in the 248Cm(19F,5n)262Db reaction and decay properties of 262Db and 258Lr
. Phys. Rev. C 89,Production of 265Sg in the 248Cm(22Ne,5n)265Sg reaction and decay properties of two isomeric states in 265Sg
. Phys. Rev. C 85,Observation of the 3n evaporation channel in the complete hot-fusion reaction 26Mg+248Cm leading to the new superheavy nuclide 271Hs
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100,Measurements of cross sections for the fusion-evaporation reactions 244Pu (48Ca, xn) 292-x 114 and 245Cm (48Ca, xn) 293-x 116
. Phy. Rev. C 69(5),Measurements of cross sections and decay properties of the isotopes of elements 112, 114, and 116 produced in the fusion reactions 233, 238U, 242Pu, and 248Cm + 48Ca
. Phy. Rev. C 70(6),Some critical remarks on a sequence of events interpreted to possibly originate from a decay chain of an element 120 isotope
. Eur. Phys. J. A 53(6), 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12307-5252cf production at the high flux isotope reactor: Nuclear data selection and leu conversion impacts, Tech. rep.
,Probing optimal reaction energy for synthesis of element 119 from 51V+248Cm reaction with quasielastic barrier distribution measurement
. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91(8),Predictions of the fusion-by-diffusion model for the synthesis cross sections of Z=114–120 elements based on macroscopic-microscopic fission barriers
. Phys. Rev. C 86,Residue cross sections of 50Ti-induced fusion reactions based on the two-step model
. Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 35–39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16035-0Isospin dependence of reactions 48Ca+243-251Bk
. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 17, 66–79 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301308011768Elimination of fast variables and initial slip: a new mechanism for fusion hindrance in heavy-ion collisions
. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys 46(11),Cross sections for the production of superheavy nuclei
. Nucl. Phys. A 944, 257–307 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.02.010Dynamical mechanism of fusion hindrance in heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 108,Improved quantum molecular dynamics model and its applications to fusion reaction near barrier
. Phys. Rev. C 65,Microscopic study of the hot-fusion reaction 48Ca+238U with the constraints from time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory
. Phys. Rev. C 107,Role of isospin composition in low-energy nuclear fusion
. Phys. Rev. C 108,Entrance channel dynamics of hot and cold fusion reactions leading to superheavy elements
. Phys. Rev. C 81,Time-dependent Hartree-Fock plus Langevin approach for hot fusion reactions to synthesize the Z = 120 superheavy element
. Phys. Rev. C 99,Fusion enhancement in the collisions with 44Ca beams and the production of neutron-deficient 245–250Lr isotopes
. Phys. Rev. C 109,Isotopic trends of quasifission and fusion-fission in the reactions 48Ca+239,244Pu
. Phys. Rev. C 98,Theoretical study of the synthesis of superheavy nuclei with Z=119 and 120 in heavy-ion reactions with trans-uranium targets
. Phys. Rev. C 85,Possibility to produce 293,295,296Og in the reactions 48Ca+249,250,251Cf
. Phys. Rev. C 100,Law of optimal incident energy for synthesizing superheavy elements in hot fusion reactions
. Phys. Rev. Res. 5,Influence of the neutron numbers of projectile and target on the evaporation residue cross sections in hot fusion reactions
. Phys. Rev. C 93,Progress on production cross-sections of unknown nuclei in fusion evaporation reactions and multinucleon transfer reactions
. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 32(01),Optimal colliding energy for the synthesis of a superheavy element with Z=119
. Phys. Rev. C 109,Production of unknown Fl isotopes in proton evaporation channels within the dinuclear system model
. Phys. Rev. C 106,Production cross sections of superheavy elements Z=119 and 120 in hot fusion reactions
. Phys. Rev. C 89,Isotopic dependence of superheavy nuclear production in hot fusion reactions
. Phys. Rev. C 92,Isotopic trends in the production of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions
. Phys. Rev. C 69,Predictions for the synthesis of new superheavy nuclei with a 252Cf target
. Chin. Phys. C 49,Search for elements 119 and 120
. Phys. Rev. C 102,Small cross section of the synthesis of darmstadtium in the 48Ca+232Th reaction
. Phys. Rev. C 110(1),Synthesis of superheavy nuclei: Nucleon collectivization as a mechanism for compound nucleus formation
. Phys. Rev. C 64,Survival probability of superheavy nuclei
. Phys. Rev. C 65,Nuclear masses and deformations
. Nucl. Phys. 81(1), 1–60 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(66)90639-0Predictions for the synthesis of unknown 279-281Nh and 287,288Nh isotopes
. Phys. Rev. C 111,Interaction barrier in charged-particle nuclear reactions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 766–769 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.766Deformation and orientation effects in the driving potential of the dinuclear model
. The European Physical Journal A - Hadrons and Nuclei. 24, 223–229 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2004-10138-1Tunnelling through the morse barrier
. Phys. Lett. A 157, 1–5 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(91)90399-SExpression for the heavy-ion fusion cross section
. Phys. Rev. C 107,Predictions of synthesizing elements with Z=119 and 120 in fusion reactions
. Phys. Rev. C 109,Systematics of capture and fusion dynamics in heavy-ion collisions
. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 114, 281–370 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2016.06.003Compound nucleus formation cross sections in lead-induced reactions
. Phys. Rev. C 111(2),Mass parameters for a dinuclear system
. Nucl. Phys. A 584(1), 205–220 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)00505-HAnalysis of the fusion mechanism in the synthesis of superheavy element 119 via the 54Cr+243Am reaction
. Phys. Rev. C 105(1),Distribution of the dissipated angular momentum in heavy-ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 27, 590–601 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.27.590Microscopic transport theory of heavy-ion collisions
. Z. Phys. A 277(3), 299–310 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415605Characteristics of quasifission products within the dinuclear system model
. Phys. Rev. C 68,A schematic model for (p, xn) cross sections in heavy elements
. Can. J. Phys. 34, 767–779 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1139/p56-087Statistics and nuclear reactions
. Phys. Rev. 52, 295–303 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.52.295The mechanism of nuclear fission
. Phys. Rev. 56, 426–450 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.426Selection of projectiles for producing trans-uranium nuclei in transfer reactions within the improved dinuclear system model
. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys 47,Odd–Even effects of the survival probability for superheavy compound nuclei
. Chin. Phys. Lett. 21, 636 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/21/4/013Systematic study of survival probability of excited superheavy nuclei
. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 54, 109–113 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-011-4438-2Synthesis of superheavy elements: Uncertainty analysis to improve the predictive power of reaction models
. Phys. Rev. C 94,Systematic study of fission barriers of excited superheavy nuclei
. Phys. Rev. C 80,The conditions for the synthesis of heavy nuclei
. Rep. Prog. Phys. 54(7), 949 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/54/7/002Feng-Shou Zhang is an editorial board member for Nuclear Science and Techniques and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.


_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-F001.jpg)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-105/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-105-F005.jpg)