logo

Method for converting in-situ gamma ray spectra of a portable Ge detector to an incident photon flux energy distribution based on Monte Carlo simulation

ADVANCED NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION AND DETECTION

Method for converting in-situ gamma ray spectra of a portable Ge detector to an incident photon flux energy distribution based on Monte Carlo simulation

Boubaker ASKRI
Adel TRABELSI
Brahim BACCARI
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.19, No.6pp.358-364Published in print 20 Dec 2008
43201

A matrix stripping method for the conversion of in-situ gamma ray spectrum, obtained with portable Ge detector, to photon flux energy distribution is proposed. The detector response is fully described by its stripping matrix and full absorption efficiency curve. A charge collection efficiency function is introduced in the simulation to take into account the existence of a transition zone of increasing charge collection after the inactive Ge layer. Good agreement is obtained between simulated and experimental full absorption efficiencies. The characteristic stripping matrix is determined by Monte Carlo simulation for different incident photon energies using the Geant4 toolkit system. The photon flux energy distribution is deduced by stripping the measured spectrum of the partial absorption and cosmic ray events and then applying the full absorption efficiency curve. The stripping method is applied to a measured in-situ spectrum. The value of the absorbed dose rate in air deduced from the corresponding flux energy distribution agrees well with the value measured directly in-situ.

Monte Carlo simulationGe detectorGamma radiationGeant4Stripping
References
[1] Helfer L, Miller K. Health Phys, 1988, 55: 15-29.
[2] Cutshall N, Larsen J. Health Phys, 1986, 51: 53-59.
[3] Beck H L, De Campo J, Gogolak C V. In-situ Ge(Li) and NaI(Tl) gamma-ray Spectrometry. New York: US Department of Energy, 1972. HASL-258.
[4] Miller K M, Shebell P. In situ gamma-ray spectrometry. A tutorial for environmental radiation scientists. New York: Department of Energy, 1993. Report EML-557.
[5] Askri B, Manai K, Trabelsi A, et al. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2007, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm426.
[6] Clouvas A, Xanthos S, Antonopoulos-Domis M, et al. Health Phys, 2000, 78(3): 295-302.
[7] Saito K, Jacob P. Radiat. Protect. Dosim, 1995, 58:29-45.
[8] Rodenas J, Rius V.

Application of Monte Carlo method to the simulation of Ge-detector calibration

, in Proceedings of the Topsafe'98, Valencia, Spain. 1998.15-17.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] Hurtado S, Garcia-Leόn M, García-Tenorio R. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2003, 518: 764-774.
[10] Korun M, Likar A, Vidmar T. Nucl Instrum Methods A, 1997, 390: 203-208.
[11] Clouvas A, Xantos S, Antonopoulos-Domis M. Health Phys, 1998, 74(2): 216-230.
[12] Rόdenas J, Ortiz J, Ballesteros L, et al.

Analysis of the simulation of Ge-detector calibration for environmental radioactive samples in a Marinelli beaker source using the Monte Carlo method

, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Monte Carlo for Radiation Physics, Particle Transport Simulation and Applications- MC2000, Lisbon: Springer, 2001, 517-522.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] Rόdenas J, Pascual A, Zarza I, et al. Nucl Instrum Methods A, 2003, 496: 390-399.
[14] Miller K M, Beck H L. Radiat Protect Dosim, 1984, 7: 185-189.
[15] Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K, et al. Nucl Instrum Methods A, 2003, 506: 250-303.
[16] ROOT.

An object-oriented data analysis framework

, http:www.root.cern.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar