Reaction cross section studies of 12C using the modified Glauber model in conjunction with nonlinear relativistic mean-field theory

NUCLEAR, HEAVY ION AND ATOMIC PHYSICS

Reaction cross section studies of ¹²C using the modified Glauber model in conjunction with nonlinear relativistic mean-field theory

FAN Guangwei，

FUKUDA Mitsunori，

AN Zhendong，

CAI Xiaolu，

FAN Gongtao，

HUANG Bosong，

LI Yongjiang，

XU Benji，

YAN Zhe，

XU Wang

Nuclear Science and Techniques

Vol.23, No.5

pp.312-316

Published in print 20 Oct 2012

DOI：10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.23.312-316

38700

We studied the structure of ¹²C through the modified Glauber model using the density distributions calculated by the relativistic mean field theory. The experimental reaction cross sections of ¹²C + ¹²C were analyzed within the MOL by a χ²–fitting procedure. The effects of the nuclear deformation on the reaction cross sections are studied. The reliable structure of ¹²C is deduced. The studies show that the conjunction of these two models will be a more effective tool to study the properties of nuclei.

Reaction cross sectionRMFGlauber modelnuclear density distribution

References

[1]

El Eid M F, Meyer B S. The L S Astrophys, 2004, J611: 452-465.

[2]

Dufour M, Descouvemont P. Phys Rev, 2008, C78, 015808:1:11.

[3]

Chernykh M, Feldmeier H, Neff T, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 98, 032501:1-4.

[4]

Amos K, Morrison I, Smith R, et al. Aust J Phys, 1981, 34: 493-504.

[5]

Sugahara Y, Toki H. Nucl Phys, 1994, A579: 557-572.

[6]

Elton L R B. Nuclear Sizes. Oxford Univ (UK): London Press, 1961, 15-300.

[7]

Chaumeaux A, Layly V, Schaeffer R. Ann Phys, 1978, 116: 247-357.

[8]

Ozawa A, Suzuki T, Tanihata I. Nucl Phys, 2001, A693: 32-62.

[9]

Horowitz C J Serot B D. Nucl Phys, 1981, A368: 503-517.

[10]

Takechi M, Fukuda M, Mihara M, et al. Eur Phys J, 2005, A25: 217-219.

[11]

Glauber R J,

Lectures in theoretical Physics

, Interscience (USA) 1959, 1: 315-325.

Baidu Scholar

Google Scholar

[12]

Abu-Ibrahim B Suzuki Y. Phys Rev, 2000, C62, 034608: 1-12.

[13]

Takechi M, Fukuda M, Mihara M, et al. Phys Rev, 2009, C79, 061601(R): 1-9.

[14]

Tanaka K, Yamaguchi T, Suzuki T, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2010, 104, 062701: 1-4.

[15]

Tanaka K, Fukuda M, Mihara M, et al. Phys Rev, 2010, C82, 044309: 1-10.

[16]

Fukuda M. Phys Lett, 1999, B268: 339-344.

[17]

Goldhaber A S, Phys Lett, 1974, B53: 306-310.

[18]

Patra S K, Panda R N, Arumugam P, et al. Phys Rev, 2009, C80, 064602: 1-12.

[19]

Furnstahl R J, Price C E. Phys Rev, 1989, C 40: 1398-1406.

[20]

Marcos S, Giai Van N, Savushkin L N. Nucl Phys, 1992, A549: 143-152.

[21]

Ren Z Z, Mitting W, Chen B Q, et al. Phys Rev, 1995, C52: R20-R22.

[22]

Ren Z Z, Chen B Q, Ma Z Y, et al. Phys Rev, 1996, C53: R572-R575.

[23]

Zhang S S, Zhao E G, Zhou S G. http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.0504.

[24]

Sharma M M, Nagarajan M A, Ring P. Phys Lett, 1993, B312: 377-381.

[25]

Sharma M M, Lalazissis G A, Ring P. Phys Lett, 1993, B317: 9-13.

[26]

Reinhard P G. Rep Prog Phys, 1989, 52: 439-455.

[27]

Reinhard P G, Rufa M, Maruhn M, et al. Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei, 1986, A323: 13-19.

[28]

Costa R S, Santiago A J. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2004, 1: 473-479.

[29]

Fan G W, Xu W, Fukuda M, et al. Chinese Phys, 2010, C34: 1622-1627.

[30]

Audi G, Wapstra A H, Thibault C. Nucl Phys, 2003, A729: 337-676.

[31]

Tanihata I, Hamagaki H, Hashimoto. Phys Rev Lett, 1985, 55: 2676-2680.