logo

Tidal effects on hydrostatic leveling system used in high precision alignment of particle accelerator

SYNCHROTRON RADIATION TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS

Tidal effects on hydrostatic leveling system used in high precision alignment of particle accelerator

XU Shao-Feng
HE Xiao-Ye
CHEN Xiao-Dong
HUANG Xian-Liang
LANG Xiao-Ling
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.25, No.4Article number 040102Published in print 20 Aug 2014Available online 11 Jul 2014
38502

Hydrostatic leveling system (HLS) is widely used in precision engineering survey, especially the alignment of particle accelerator, and the tidal effects on the measurement accuracy of HLS is non-ignorable, thus studies on tidal effects on the HLS is vital. A set of HLS was installed in Jingxian seismostation for verifying the methods to handle the tidal effects on the readings of HLS. Harmonic analysis of the data recorded by HLS and DSQ water tube clinometers in Jingxian seismostation and contrastive analysis of the results are completed. The tilt tide can be well reflected in the data of the both instruments and the results are both reliable. The reasons of the difference between the results are analyzed in this paper. Besides, a validation study based on the measurement data of the HLS used in SPring-8 storage ring for tidal correction on the reading of HLS is completed. The research establishes a foundation for HLS to be applied in micron-level precision alignment of particle accelerator in the future.

Precision engineering surveyHydrostatic leveling systemTilt tideDSQ water tube clinometersHarmonic analysis

I. INTRODUCTION

A hydrostatic leveling system (HLS), based on the principle that the liquid (deionized water or purified water) in the HLS is always looking for an equipotential surface, uses connected reservoirs of water to determine elevation difference at the locations of HLS [1]. Fig. 1 briefly represents the measuring principle of HLS, among which h1, h2, h3 represent the data collected from each sensor, thus the height difference Δh1 and Δh2 can be described as Eq. (1):

Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram of HLS.
pic
Δh1=h2h1,Δh2=h2h3. (1)

HLSs are applied in CERN (Switzerland), ESRF (France), DESY (Germany), Fermilab (USA), BEPC II (China), SLAC (USA), and SSRF (China) [2-10]. Fig. 2 shows the structural diagrams of HLS vessel used in NSRL, BEPCII and SSRF [11].

Fig. 2.
Structural diagram of HLS vessel.
pic

In precision engineering survey (micron scale), however, the tidal effects on HLS readings cannot be ignored. For instance, at CERN or SLAC, large particle accelerators were designed while taking earth tides into account for proper operation [12, 13]. Under the action of various forces, the Earth body undergoes complicated deformation. Any point on earth is affected by gravitation of the Sun and the Moon, besides the gravity and the rotational centrifugal force of the Earth. Then, the Earth deforms periodically under the action of tidal force, and this is the earth tide.

Figure 3 shows a DSQ water tube clinometer and its schematic diagram [14]. Technically, it works on the principle of liquid equipotential surface, too, but it differs from a conventional HLS in the sensors to measure the liquid level and in the structure parameters. With DSQ water tube clinometer, resolution of a hydrostatic leveling system is 0.001 arcsec and daily drift is less than 0.005 arcsec [15].

Fig. 3.
(Color online) DSQ water tube clinometer (a) and its schematics (b).
pic

DSQ system has been used in tilt tide observation in seismostation. In this paper, we report the series harmonic analysis of the data and contrastive analysis of tidal monitoring observations between HLS and DSQ, carried out at the Jingxian seismostation, Anhui, China.

II. HARMONIC ANALYSIS OF HLS AND DSQ DATA

A. HLS installation

A set of HLSs were installed in a cave at the Jingxian seismostation. The temperature and humidity there are stable, and the background noise is extremely low. Table 1 lists specifications of HLS installations at the seismostation.

TABLE 1.
Specifications of HLS installations at Jingxian seismostation
Items E-W segment S-N segment
Azimuth 84.03375° 84.03375°
Elevation 55 m 55 m
Interval (fore and aft) 22.1 m 18.1 m
Tubing PE PE
Sampling interval 1200 s 1200 s
Show more
B. Harmonic analysis of HLS data

For harmonic analysis, Fig. 4 shows the height difference of sensor readings from 10/11/2012 to 26/01/2013.

Fig. 4.
(Color online) Height difference of sensor readings of the N-S (a) and E-W (b) segments.
pic
1. Temperature compensation

Temperature compensation shall be made to the raw data. The temperature effect on the HLS readings can be compensated by Eqs. (2)–(4):

βwater=dρ/(ρdT), (2) ΔV=(βwaterβpipe)VΔT, (3) Δh=ΔV/S, (4)

where, βwater and βpipe are thermal expansion coefficient of water in the HLS vessels and the connecting pipe, respectively; T is the water temperature; ρ is the water density; ΔV is the change in water volume; ΔT is the temperature change; Δh is the height change in liquid level in the HLS vessels; and S is the internal cross-section of the vessel. Typically, Δh = -0.1 ℃. The negative value is due to different thermal expansion coefficients of water (2.5×10-4, 25 ℃), stainless steel (4.5×10-5) and PE pipe (4.5×10-4), respectively.

2. Data processing

Data handling, including linear and cubic interpolation, and multilinear regression, was done by using the T-soft code recommended by ICET (International Center for Earth Tides) [16]. The tilt angle is very small (Fig. 5), so the height difference could be converted into tilt angle using Eq. (5):

Fig. 5.
Conversion diagram.
pic
θ=(D2D1)×103×3600×180×103/(Lπ), (5)

where, D1 and D2 are the data (in millimeter) measured from each sensor, L is the distance between the two monitoring sites (in meter), and θ is the tilt angle (in mas, milli-arcsecond). The tilt angles of the E-W segment are shown in Fig. 6 using the T-soft code.

Fig. 6.
Tilt angles of the E-W segment from November 2012 to January 2013, obtained using the T-soft code.
pic
3. Results of harmonic analysis

Harmonic analysis of HLS data was completed using the Eterna code, which is the standard software recommended by ICET [17]. The E-W and N-S tilt tidal factors of the semi-diurnal and diurnal tidal waves are given in Table 2. Fig. 7 shows the predicted tide from HLS data (N-S segment) after harmonic analysis. The influence of the tidal effects is about ± 1 μm in 18.1 m by converting the tilt angle to height difference.

TABLE 2.
Results of the harmonic analysis on HLS data
Tilt tidal factors (E-W) Tilt tidal factors (N-S)
Semi-diurnal Diurnal Semi-diurnal Diurnal
S2 0.50348 Q1 0.33916 S2 1.06434 Q1 0.68855
N2 0.42331 O1 0.41125 N2 0.49223 O1 0.76977
M2 0.72582 M1 0.4960 M2 0.63772 M1 0.87765
N2 0.78599 J1 1.0380 2N2 0.96087 J1 0.59780
Show more
Fig. 7.
Predicted tide from HLS data (N-S segment).
pic
C. Harmonic analysis of data from DSQ

DSQ water tube clinometers are installed on bedrock, which is very stable. The data before and after multilinear regression are partially shown in Fig. 8(a) to reflect the tidal effects on the clinometers (in mas), with just the data of N-S segment. Fig. 8(b) shows the predicted tide from DSQ data (N-S segment) after harmonic analysis. The E-W and N-S tilt tidal factors are listed in Table 3.

TABLE 3.
Result of the harmonic analysis on DSQ water tube clinometers
Tilt tidal factors(E-W) Tilt tidal factors (N-S)
Semi-diurnal Diurnal Semi-diurnal Diurnal
S2 0.82839 Q1 0.50892 S2 0.78760 Q1 1.03943
N2 0.56528 J1 0.57366 N2 0.46880 J1 0.91027
M2 0.80333 J1 0.42540 M2 0.63136 J1 1.01894
N2 0.58420 J1 1.29475 2N2 0.52474 J1 1.02653
Show more
Fig. 8.
Partial data before and after multilinear regression (a) and the predicted tide from DSQ data (b), for the N-S segment.
pic

III. CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TILT TIDAL FACTOR

A. Damping constant of different instruments

According to Tables 2 and 3, the preliminary hypothesis is that the tilt tidal factors are related with the type of observation instruments, just as the frequency response does. And these influence factors should be investigated.

Considering the same principle of HLS and DSQ, both the instruments basically follow the Euler kinematical equation of the fluid:

d2D/d2t+2ω0ξ0dD/dt+ω02D=0, (6)

where, ω0=[2sg/(SL)]1/2 is the natural angular frequency, S and s are respectively the internal cross-section of the sensor and the water tube, g is the local gravitational acceleration, and L is the distance between the two monitoring sites; and ξ0 = 4πK/(sρω0) is the damping constant of the liquid surface vibration, D is the height difference between the real time height and the initial equilibrium height of the liquid surface, K and ρ are respectively the viscous coefficient and density of the liquid in the tube.

Assuming that the deviation value of the height difference in the beginning is D0, when t=0, dD/dt =0, D(0)=0, solution of Eq. (6) can be described as Eqs. (7)–(9):

D(t)=ξ0eξ0ω0t1ξ02sin[1ξ02ω0t+tan11ξ02ξ0],ξ0<1, (7) D(t)=ξ0(1+ω0t)eω0t,ξ0=1, (8) D(t)=ξ0eD0ω0t1ξ02sh[ξ021ω0t+th1ξ021ξ0],ξ0>1, (9)

From Eqs. (7)–(9), influence of the damping constant on movement of the liquid surface is obvious: ξ0 is related with parameters of S, L, K, s and ρ, and basically each of the parameters of HLS differs from that of DSQ. The damping constant of HLS [1] did differ from that of DSQ [18]. Although the two instruments were installed in the same site (with the same tilt tide), the height difference D(t) between the real time height and the initial equilibrium height of the liquid surface is different, hence the different calculation results of tilt tidal factors.

B. Relations between damping constant and the frequency response of the instrument

Frequency response Q(T) of HLS and DSQ can be described as Eq. (10), where ξ0 is the damping constant of the liquid surface vibration; α=T0/T is the cycle ration, T0 is duty cycle of the instrument, and T is the cycle of ground motion.

Q(T)=1(1α2)2+4ξ02α2. (10)

Figure 9 shows the frequency response of the instrument. According to the design parameters of HLS at Jingxian seismostation, duty cycle of the instrument is 67 s [1], which is smaller than the cycle of earth tide, the α value is almost zero, so Q(T)=1 in Fig. 8(a), the tidal signal is not distorted at all. But if an earthquake or ground effect happened, sympathetic vibration would happen when the cycle of the disturbing signal is close to the duty cycle of the instrument. HLS differs from DSQ in their duty cycle and ξ0, hence the different frequency response of the instruments. From the raw data recorded by the two instruments, the sympathetic vibration phenomenon happened during the period, which might lead to different frequency domain signal distortion. This is another reason to explain the different results of harmonic analysis.

Fig. 9.
Frequency response curve.
pic
C. Results

According to the earth tide theory and Tables 2 and 3, the tilt tidal factor of M2 is 0.68, the calculated tilt tidal factor from HLS of M2 is 0.72582, and the value from DSQ is 0.80333. Based on the analysis above, the difference between the results of the tilt tidal factor is related with the type of observation instruments with different damping constants. In spite of a little difference between the tilt tidal factor of HLS and DSQ, but the amplitude of predicted tide of HLS data and DSQ data is the same according to Figs. 7 and 8(b). Therefore, the tilt tide can be well reflected in the data of both instruments and both the results are reliable, and the method to treat the tilt tide effects on the reading of HLS is feasible.

IV. TIDAL CORRECTION TO THE HLS DATA USED IN SPRING-8 STORAGE RING

A validation study based on measurement data of the HLS used in particle accelerator for tidal correction on the HLS reading is necessary. A set of HLSs were installed in the SPring-8 storage ring, in Hyogo, Japan, as shown in Fig. 10(a). The two HLSs, linked with pipes, were 146.4 m apart. Two HLS readings during 1/1/2006 to 11/1/2006 are shown in Fig. 10(b). The changing trend of the readings is well reflected. Through harmonic analysis to the data of HLS in SPring-8 storage ring, the local tilt tide model was calculated and predicted by the Eterna code. The results are shown in Fig. 10(c). The tidal effects on the height difference between the two HLSs are shown in dashed line in Fig. 11(a), and subtracting the residual signal after tidal correction from the height difference, the ground deformation is obtained, as shown in Fig. 11(b).

Fig. 10.
(Color online) The HLS locations (a), the HLS readings (b) and the predicted tide (c) at SPring-8 in 2006.
pic
Fig. 11.
(Color online) Height difference and the relative tidal correction (a), and residual signal after tidal correction (b).
pic

It is known that the earth tide does not affect the straightness of accelerator alignment, but it changes inclination of the whole system. So, the tidal effects on the HLS readings must be corrected, otherwise it will cause alignment errors in the particle accelerator. According to Fig. 11(a), the maximum amplitude of tilt tide model is ±0.038 mm, in other words, the absolute influence of the tidal effects is 0.076 mm in 146.4 meters, hence the non-negligibility of the tidal effects on the HLS readings. Due to the research on the tidal effects on HLS, related components of the accelerator are working properly, and accuracy of the alignment is improved.

V. SUMMARY

It is known that the main goal for the processing of the HLS measurements is therefore to isolate the local ground deformations from the raw measurement signal. Two different instruments to determining the ground deformations have been tried. Based on the data recorded by HLS and DSQ, and the contrastive analysis of the harmonic results, the tilt tide can be well reflected in the data of the two instruments. So the method discussed in this paper to handle the tidal effects on the readings of HLS can be proved to be feasible and reliable, the local ground deformations are obtained by deleting the tide effects on the readings of the instruments. Then the validation study based on the measurement data of the HLS used in Spring-8 storage ring for tidal correction on the reading of HLS is completed, and the maximum amplitude of the tidal effects on the readings of HLS is obtained. Obviously, the accuracy of alignment with using HLS is improved. It can be concluded that HLS application in micron-level precision alignment of particle accelerators is achievable.

References
[1] He X Y and He X H. J Geodesy Geodyn, 2007, 27: 122-124. (in Chinese)
[2] Roux D. in Proceedings of IWAA1989, SLAC, Stanford University, 1989, 37-72.
[3] He X Y. Chinese J Nucl Sci Eng, 2006, 26: 332-333. (in Chinese)
[4] Martin D and Roux D. in Proceedings of IWAA1990, Hamburg, Germany, 1990, 171-181.
[5] Martin D. in Proceedings of EPAC1992, Berlin, Germany,1992, 141-143.
[6] Gatta G, Levet N, Martin D. in Proceedings of IWAA1999, Grenoble, France, 1999.
[7] Martin D. in Proceedings of The 22nd Advanced ICFA Beam Dynamics Workshop on Ground Motion in Future Accelerators, SLAC, USA, 2000, 341-357.
[8] He X Y, Huang K X, Chen S Y, et al. Nucl Tech, 2007, 30: 486-487. (in Chinese)
[9] He X Y and Wu J. Nucl Tech, 2010, 33: 326-327. (in Chinese)
[10] He X Y. Latest Developments and Applications of Hydrostatic Levelling System. Hefei (China): USTC press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[11] He X Y, Wang J H, Chen Q T, et al. in Proceedings of IWAA 2008, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan. 2008.
[12] Mark J. in Proceedings of IWAA 2010, DESY, Hamburg, Germany, 2010.
[13] Seryi A, Ruland R E, Baklakov B, et al. in Proceedings of PAC2001, IEEE, 2001, 2: 1479-1481.
[14] Nie L, Wen X W, Yi Z C, et al. Crustal Deformation Earthq, 2001, 21: 74-81. (in Chinese)
[15] Zheng Z F and Zhou D J. Seismol Geomagnetic Observation Res, 2006, 27: 52-56. (in Chinese)
[16] Van Camp M and Vauterin P. Comput Geosci, 2005, 31: 631-640.
[17] Wenzel H G. Bull Inf Mar ées Terrestres, 1996, 124: 9425-9439.
[18] Zhou Y Y, Wu T, Wen X W, et al. J Geodesy Geodyn, 2010, 30: 99-101. (in Chinese)