logo

Mercury (II) Detection by Water-Soluble Photoluminescent Ultra-Small Carbon Dots Synthesized from Cherry Tomatoes

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Mercury (II) Detection by Water-Soluble Photoluminescent Ultra-Small Carbon Dots Synthesized from Cherry Tomatoes

WANG Peng
ZHONG Ruibo
YUAN Ming
GONG Pei
ZHAO Xinmin
ZHANG Feng
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.27, No.2Article number 35Published in print 20 Apr 2016Available online 07 Apr 2016
48900

Mercury ions have been considered highly toxic to human health. What would be great is to develop the ionic probes without any toxicities themselves. Here we report a friendly, highly sensitive mercury (II) ionic probe, water-soluble photoluminescence carbon dots which were synthesized by simply hydrothermal treatment of fresh cherry tomatoes without adding any other reagents. The ultra-small (< 1 nm) carbon dots show robust excitation-depended photoluminescence under a wide pH range (4-10) or a strong ionic strength of up to 1 M, and the detection limit of mercury (II) has been determined as low as 18 nM. We envision such water-soluble, biocompatible carbon dots could be applied to bio-labeling, bio-imaging, and bio-sensing fields.

carbon dotsphotoluminescencecherry tomatomercurydetection

1. INTRODUCTION

Mercury is a neurotoxic and physiological toxic heavy metal which severely affects human health. It mainly causes harm to the central nervous system, digestive system and internal organs. More specifically, mercury vapors and organic mercury derivatives (e.g., methylmercury) can affect brain and its functions that result in personality changes, tremors, vision problems, deafness, and losses of muscle coordination, sensation, and memory [1]. Because mercury is non-biodegradable, it’s a threat to human even at a very low concentration. The global mercury emission is about 7500 tons every year [2]. A number of fluorescent probes including organic dyes, nanoclusters and quantum dots (QDs) have been developed for fluorescent detection of Hg2+ [3-6]. But these materials all suffer from the disadvantages such as complexed synthesis methods or significant toxicity even at relatively low concentrations. Therefore, simple, economical, green protocols are urgently needed.

Compared to QDs or organic dyes, carbon dots (C-dots) have attracted many attentions due to their extraordinary properties such as lower cost, bright photoluminescence (PL), biocompatibilty, easy functionalization, low toxicity and high photostability [7-9]. Almost all the carbon-containing materials, in particular many fruits and vegetables also can be used as raw materials for C-dots synthesis [10-14]. C-dots are widely used in a plenty of applications such as imaging [15], sensing [16], labeling [17], fluorescent ink [18], lasers [19] and so on. C-dots represent that the researches on luminescent nanoparticles have reached a new stage. Cherry tomatoes are rounded, small fruited tomatoes, which have been considered as an intermediate genetic admixture between wild currant-type tomatoes and domesticated garden tomatoes. Regarding to the chemistry components, cherry tomatoes rich in vitamin (about 1.7 times of common tomatoes), glutathione and lycopene. In this paper, we synthesized C-dots through hydrothermal synthesis method [20-22] via Cherry tomatoes. The as-prepared C-dots can be directly used as a probe for Hg2+ detection without any further modification and the detection limit of Hg2+ is 18 nM.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Cherry tomatoes was purchased from the localized (Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China) vegetable market. All other reagents such as H2SO4, HgSO4, NaCl, NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4 were of analytical reagent grade supplied by Sinopharm Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and used without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of CDs

C-dots were prepared by hydrothermal treatment of cherry tomatoes. The cherry tomatoes were smashed with a pestle and mortar. In a typical synthesis, 5 ml of the prepared cherry tomatoes liquid was transferred into a 50 mL steel-lined autoclave and heated at 200 °C for 5 h. The precipitate was discarded and the supernatant was subjected to dialysis against Milli-Q water with a cellulose ester membrane bag (molecular-weight cutoff: 1 kDa) to remove small molecules and then to centrifugation at 10, 000 rpm for 10 min. The pellet was dried under vacuum for 48 h and re-dispersed in Milli-Q water to reach a concentration of 0.4 mg/mL.

2.3. Hydrodynamic Diameter and Zeta Potential Measurements

Both the hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) and the zeta potential measurements were conducted on a dynamic light scattering (DLS) instrument (Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK) equipped with quartz or disposable cuvette (DTS0012, minimum sample volume is 1 mL) fitted with a 633 nm He-Ne laser beam. Measurements were taken at 25 °C and 90° scattering angle. Dh and PDI were obtained by cumulant analysis (software of Zetasizer Nano-ZS90, Malvern Instruments Ltd.).

2.4. Spectroscopy Measurement

The absorbance and the photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded on a UV–Vis spectrometer (U-2900, Hitachi) and a fluorescence spectrometer (Fluorolog®-MAX 4, Horiba), respectively. Both equipped with a 1.0 cm quartz cell. For PL measurement, both excitation and emission slits were set up to 5 nm.

2.5. Hg2+ Sensing

The Hg2+ solution with different concentration were prepared by dissolving HgSO4 in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). 1 mL C-dots (0.4 mg/mL) was dissolved in 39 mL PBS (pH 6.0) to detect Hg2+. For the sensing assay, 10 μmg/mL C-dots mixed with Hg2+ solution of varied concentrations of 0.018 μM,0.039 μM,0.0781 μM,0.1562 μM,0.3125 μM,0.625 μM,1.25 μM to a final volume of 2 mL was used for recording the PL spectra by a fluorescence spectroscopy, respectively.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The C-dots dissolved in pure water showed a characteristic absorption spectrum with a peak at 281 nm and a relatively narrow and symmetric emission spectrum with a peak at 439 nm upon the excitation at 360 nm (Fig. 1(a)). The insert picture of Fig. 1(a) shows the symbolic blue photoluminescent property of C-dots under illumination of UV light (right). It is similar to most of the reported photoluminescent C-dots [23] and G-dots [24], the PL of our C-dots is also excitation dependent (Fig. 1(b)), which is generally attributed to the optical selection of size-depended quantum effect and emissive traps on the C-dots surface [25, 26]. The water-soluble C-dots were firstly evaluated by DLS. The average hydrodynamic size of C-dots evaluated by DLS is 0.64  ± 0.2 nm with a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.622 (Fig. 1(c)), which is consistent with the size analysis results by AFM (Fig. S1). The zeta-potential measurement proved that the surface of the as-prepared C-dots is positively charged (Fig. 1(d)).

Fig. 1.
(a) UV-vis absorption (black line) peaks at 281nm and PL (red line) peaks at 439 nm of the C-dots upon the excitation with a wavelength of 360 nm. The inset is a digital photo of C-dots dispersed in pure water under illumination of daylight (left) and 365 nm UV light (right), respectively. (b) PL spectra of the C-dots with various excitation wavelengths from 320 nm to 500 nm (slit = 5 nm). The inset is the normalized PL spectra. (c) Hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) distribution histogram of C-dots by DLS, the histogram statistics shows the average Dh is 0.64  ± 0.2 nm with a PDI of 0.622. (d) The zeta-potential result of C-dots is 5.2 mV.
pic

The photostability of fluorophores is a very important property which determines the feasibility towards successful bio-applications. From Fig. 2, it is clear that the PL intensity of C-dots remains relatively constant with varying ionic strengths up to 1.0 M (Fig. 2(a)) and under long time up to 12 h illumination of white light (Fig. 2(c)), which indicates the robust photostablity of the as-prepared C-dots in aqueous solution. However, the pH tests show that the PL intensities of C-dots decrease in the solutions of high or low pH, but remain relatively constant in the pH range of 5 – 8 (Fig. 2(b)). Moreover, obvious photobleaching can be also found after 5 h of continuous UV excitation (Fig. 2(d)). Because the emission control of the surface state/molecule state can be strongly affected by surrounding factors, such as solvent pH [27], which could account for the decrease of our C-dots’ PL intensity at a pH that was too low/high or under exposure to high-power UV radiation.

Fig. 2.
Effect of (a) ionic strength and (b) pH on the PL intensity of C-dots (10 μg/mL) at 439 nm when excited at 360 nm. The 10 mM phosphate buffer was used for pH 4 - 10 solutions. All the values are the average of triplicate measurements. The stability of the fluorescence intensity of C-dots for different time under (c) white light and (d) UV.
pic

From the previous publications [10, 28, 29], we know that Hg2+ can efficiently quench the fluorescence of C-dots presumably via electron or energy transfer. Therefore, C-dots can be used as a very good tool for the Hg2+ sensing. Since the as-prepared C-dots are stable at a pH range from 5 – 9 and resistant to a higher ionic strength, both of which are suitable for a biosensor, so we chose PBS buffer for the Hg2+ detection experiments. As shown in Fig. 3(a), when different concentrated Hg2+ was added into the 10 μmg/mL C-dots solution, respectively, the PL intensity of C-dots was gradually quenched. This may be attributed to the fact that the interaction between Hg2+ and the carboxylate and thiol groups makes C-dots close to each other, which accelerates the non-radiative recombination of the excitons through an effective electron transfer process, leading to a substantial decrease of the PL of C-dots. The sensing assay of different metal ions by the as-prepared C-dots showed a high selectivity for Hg2+ (Fig. S2). This interaction would undermine the stability of the C-dot’s PL properties and cause the quenching of PL, which can be described using the Stern–Volmer equation [30-32].

Fig. 3.
(a) PL spectra of C-dots in the presence of various concentrations of Hg2+. The final concentrations of Hg2+ as indicated from a to h as are 1.25 μM, 0.625 μM, 312.5 nM, 156.2 nM, 78.1 nM, 39 nM, and 18 nM, respectively. (b) The Stern-Volmer plot of C-dots PL intensity against the concentration of the quencher Hg2+. The correlation coefficient (R2) of the fitting line is 0.998.
pic
F0F=1+Ksv[Hg2+] (1)

Where F0, F are the PL intensity in the absence and presence of Hg2+, and KSV is the Stern–Volmer quenching constant. A typical Stern–Volmer plot is shown in Fig. 3(b), and a good linear fitting function of F0/F = 0.96 + 0.0197×[Hg2+] can be obtained over the concentration ranging from 1.8×10-8 M to 1.25×10-6 M. The binding constant of Hg2+ with C-dots is determined to be 1.97 μM-1, with a detection limit of 18 nM. With this calibration equation, we also detected the real water samples from city tap water, and two lakes’ water, however, compared with the manually prepared mercury ions-containing solutions, these water samples showed very low PL signals (Fig. S3), which did not only indicate the good quality of our drink water and the lakes’ water, but also proved our as-prepared C-dots can be really applied to the mercury ions detection.

4. Conclusion

In this article, we have successfully synthesized C-dots with cherry tomatoes through a facile hydrothermal synthesis method. The resulting C-dots have been thoroughly characterized from hydrodynamic diameter to optical properties under different solution gradients, and have been further applied to detect mercury ions with a detection limit up to 18 nM, which could be attributed to the glutathione abundant in cherry tomatoes, in that both carboxyl and thiol groups of glutathione can form a strong bond with Hg2+, which might be critical for selective detection of mercury ions. Due to the resources derived from, the C-dots can be more biocompatible in principle than others derived from chemicals, and their ultra-small diameter combined with the robust photoluminescent properties could make them find more applications in bio-labeling, bio-imaging and bio-sensing fields beyond the industrial field.

References
1. Zheng W., Aschner M. and Ghersi-Egea J. F.

Brain barrier systems: a new frontier in metal neurotoxicological research

. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2003, 192: 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0041-008x(03)00251-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. Agency U. E. P. Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Clean Air Mercury Rule EPA-452/R-05 003. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,, 2005.
3. Wang Y. Q., Liu Y., He X. W., et al.

Highly sensitive synchronous fluorescence determination of mercury (II) based on the denatured ovalbumin coated CdTe QDs

. Talanta, 2012, 99: 69-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.04.064
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. Chao M. R., Chang Y. Z. and Chen J. L.

Hydrophilic ionic liquid-passivated CdTe quantum dots for mercury ion detection

. Biosens Bioelectron, 2013, 42: 397-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.10.065
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. Ke J., Li X., Zhao Q., et al.

Ultrasensitive quantum dot fluorescence quenching assay for selective detection of mercury ions in drinking water

. Sci Rep, 2014, 4: 5624. DOI: 10.1038/srep05624
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. Pei J., Zhu H., Wang X., et al.

Synthesis of cysteamine-coated CdTe quantum dots and its application in mercury (II) detection

. Anal Chim Acta, 2012, 757: 63-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.037
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. Bottini M. and Mustelin T.

Carbon materials - Nanosynthesis by candlelight

. Nat Nanotechnol, 2007, 2: 599-600. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2007.316
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. Demchenko A. P. and Dekaliuk M. O.

Novel fluorescent carbonic nanomaterials for sensing and imaging

. Methods Appl Fluoresc, 2013, 1: 1-17. DOI: 10.1088/2050-6120/1/4/042001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. Li H. T., Kang Z. H., Liu Y., et al.

Carbon nanodots: synthesis, properties and applications

. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 24230-24253. DOI: 10.1039/C2jm34690g
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. Lu W., Qin X., Liu S., et al.

Economical, green synthesis of fluorescent carbon nanoparticles and their use as probes for sensitive and selective detection of mercury(II) ions

. Anal Chem, 2012, 84: 5351-5357. DOI: 10.1021/ac3007939
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. Zhu C., Zhai J. and Dong S.

Bifunctional fluorescent carbon nanodots: green synthesis via soy milk and application as metal-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction

. Chem Commun, 2012, 48: 9367-9369. DOI: 10.1039/c2cc33844k
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. Zhou J. J., Sheng Z. H., Han H. Y., et al.

Facile synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots using watermelon peel as a carbon source

. Mater Lett, 2012, 66: 222-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.08.081
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. Sun Y. X., He Z. W., Sun X. B., et al.

Synthesis of Water-Soluble Fluorescent Carbon Dots from a One-Step Hydrothermal Method with Potato

. Adv Mater Res, 2013, 873: 770-776. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.873.770
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. Yin B., Deng J., Peng X., et al.

Green synthesis of carbon dots with down- and up-conversion fluorescent properties for sensitive detection of hypochlorite with a dual-readout assay

. Analyst, 2013, 138: 6551-6557. DOI: 10.1039/c3an01003a
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. Cao L., Wang X., Meziani M. J., et al.

Carbon dots for multiphoton bioimaging

. J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129: 11318-+. DOI: 10.1021/Ja073527l
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. Yu C. M., Li X. Z., Zeng F., et al.

Carbon-dot-based ratiometric fluorescent sensor for detecting hydrogen sulfide in aqueous media and inside live cells

. Chem Commun, 2013, 49: 403-405. DOI: 10.1039/C2cc37329g
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. Wang W., Li Y., Cheng L., et al.

Water-soluble and phosphorus-containing carbon dots with strong green fluorescence for cell labeling

. J Mater Chem B, 2014, 2: 46-48. DOI: 10.1039/c3tb21370f
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. Qu S. N., Wang X. Y., Lu Q. P., et al.

A Biocompatible Fluorescent Ink Based on Water-Soluble Luminescent Carbon Nanodots

. Angew Chem Int Edit, 2012, 51: 12215-12218. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206791
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. Zhang W. F., Zhu H., Yu S. F., et al.

Observation of lasing emission from carbon nanodots in organic solvents

. Adv Mater, 2012, 24: 2263-2267. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201104950
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. Sha Y., Lou J., Bai S., et al.

Hydrothermal synthesis of nitrogen-containing carbon nanodots as the high-efficient sensor for copper(II) ions

. Mater Res Bull, 2013, 48: 1728-1731. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.12.010
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. Pei S., Zhang J., Gao M., et al.

A facile hydrothermal approach towards photoluminescent carbon dots from amino acids

. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2015, 439: 129-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.10.030
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. Yuan M., Zhong R., Gao H., et al.

One-step, Green and Economic Synthesis of Water-Soluble Photoluminescent Carbon Dots by Hydrothermal Treatment of Wheat Straw and Their Bio-applications in Labeling, Imaging and Sensing

. Appl Surf Sci. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.095
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. Pan D. Y., Zhang J. C., Li Z., et al.

Observation of pH-, solvent-, spin-, and excitation-dependent blue photoluminescence from carbon nanoparticles

. Chem Commun, 2010, 46: 3681-3683. DOI: 10.1039/C000114g
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. Pan D. Y., Zhang J. C., Li Z., et al.

Hydrothermal Route for Cutting Graphene Sheets into Blue-Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots

. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 734-+. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200902825
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. Long Y. M., Zhou C. H., Zhang Z. L., et al.

Shifting and non-shifting fluorescence emitted by carbon nanodots

. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 5917-5920. DOI: 10.1039/C2jm30639e
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. Tang L. B., Ji R. B., Cao X. K., et al.

Deep Ultraviolet Photoluminescence of Water-Soluble Self-Passivated Graphene Quantum Dots

. ACS Nano, 2012, 6: 5102-5110. DOI: 10.1021/Nn300760g
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. Zhang F., Ali Z., Amin F., et al.

In vitro and intracellular sensing by using the photoluminescence of quantum dots

. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2010, 397: 935-942. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3609-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. Zhou L., Lin Y., Huang Z., et al.

Carbon nanodots as fluorescence probes for rapid, sensitive, and label-free detection of Hg2+and biothiols in complex matrices

. Chem Commun, 2012, 48: 1147-1149. DOI: 10.1039/c2cc16791c
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. Yuan M., Zhong R., Gao H., et al.

One-step, green, and economic synthesis of water-soluble photoluminescent carbon dots by hydrothermal treatment of wheat straw, and their bio-applications in labeling, imaging, and sensing

. Appl Surf Sci, 2015, 355: 1136-1144. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.095
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30. Zhong R. B., Liu Y. S., Zhang P., et al.

Discrete Nanoparticle-BSA Conjugates Manipulated by Hydrophobic Interaction

. Acs Appl Mater Inter, 2014, 6: 19465-19470. DOI: 10.1021/Am506497s
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31. Yuan M., Zhong R., Yun X., et al.

A fluorimetric study on the interaction between a Trp-containing beta-strand peptide and amphiphilic polymer-coated gold nanoparticles

. Luminescence, 2015: n/a-n/a. DOI: 10.1002/bio.2920
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32. Liu Y., Zhang P., Zhong R., et al.

Fluorimetric Study on the Interaction between Fluoresceinamine and Bovine Serum Albumin

. Nucl Sci Tech, 2015, 26: 030505. DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.26.030505
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
Footnote

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41365-016-0038-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.