logo

Radioactive contents and background doses from northern alluvial sediment plains between rivers Ravi and Chenab, Pakistan

NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE

Radioactive contents and background doses from northern alluvial sediment plains between rivers Ravi and Chenab, Pakistan

JABBAR Abdul
KHAN Khalid
TANIA Jabbar
RAFIQUE Muhammad
S U Rehman
WAHEED Arshed
DILBAND Muhammad
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.27, No.4Article number 94Published in print 20 Aug 2016Available online 13 Jul 2016
43500

Radiometric analysis of soil samples, collected from northern alluvial sediment plains between rivers Ravi and Chenab, have been carried out. Activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and the artificial radionuclide 137Cs were estimated by using high purity germanium detector (HPGe). Subsequent values of activity concentrations were used to find terrestrial absorbed dose rate and annual effective doses received by resident of area. The mean radioactivity levels of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs were found to be 45.0±1.3, 59.6±2.8, 613.8±20.0 and 4.0±0.2 Bq kg-1 respectively. Terrestrial absorbed dose rate and annual effective dose received by public was found 85.1 nGy h-1 and 0.5 mSv respectively. The activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs and resulting doses obtained for the current study were compared with data available in literature and with international standards.

Alluvial sediment plainsGamma-ray spectrometryradioactivityanthropogenic/primordial radionuclidesradiation doses

1 Introduction

Soil has got central position in all the environmental issues. Man has an intimate relation with the soil where he lives. All his food is grown in soil. Thus any change in the top layers of soil is bound to affect the man in one or the other way. Radionuclide’s presents in soil are important components of soil pollution. Primordial radionuclide’s 238U, 232Th, 87Rb and 40K contributes predominant part of the radioactivity in upper layers of the soil, whilst, anthropogenic radionuclides, 137Cs and 90Sr are also present in the soil originating from nuclear weapon tests, medical procedures and from nuclear accidents. These primordial and anthropogenic radionuclide’s are source of human exposure to back ground radiations [1].

Natural background radiation coming from terrestrial sources, not only, varies worldwide but also within the country. Knowledge about the distribution pattern of both anthropogenic and natural radionuclides is essential in maintaining some sense of control in prevailing radiation levels. In addition, it also provides information about the naturally occurring sources in the soil. Among main contributions from natural exposures from soil are 238U, 232Th series,40K [2] and 137Cs which is an important fission product from fall out [3]. 238U, 232Th and 40K are also known as primordial radionuclides. These radionuclides compose a significant portion of the natural radionuclides present on earth because they are significantly long-lived and havehalf-lives long enough to have been present at the beginning of the earth’s formation [4, 5].

The study of the background level of 137Cs in soil is very important since it is the main source of inventory of radionuclides entering into the food cycle. Its presence in soil would clearly indicate that the area under study might have received some fallout radioactivity in the past [6-8].

Due to increased public awareness about radioactive pollutants, it was decided to analyze the soil for radioactive contentsof northern alluvial sediment plains between rivers Ravi and Chenab, Pakistan. This paper deals with the measurement of decay products of uranium/thorium series, primordial radionuclide 40K and 137Cs in soil samples taken from various parts of the study area. The study of these radionuclides is very important due totheir radiological hazards. Some of these radionuclides have tremendous biochemical and geological tracers in the environment. In this perspective, activities of radionuclides 226Ra, 232Th series, 40K and 137Cs are being determined worldwide and the data is available in literature for many countries. The soil radioactivity levels of the above mentioned gamma emitting radionuclides have been assessed through gamma spectrometric technique innorthern alluvial sediment plains of Rechna Doab, Pakistan comprising of districts Sialkot, Narowal, Gujranwala and Hafizabad and discussed in this paper.

2 Study Area

The interfluvial region between rivers Ravi and Chenab, can be classified as one of the main regions of Punjab. Plain areas of Punjab are divided into natural regions based on its various rivers and the name Punjab is also based on its 5 main rivers. It comprising about 28,500 square kilometer is enclosed by the river Chenab and river Ravi on the Northwest and Southeast respectively, with the piedmonts near the Jammu and Kashmir boundary in the Northeast. It lies between longitude 71o 48' to 75o 20' E and latitude 30o 31' to 32o 51' N. It is about 403 kilometer, in southwest direction and has a maximum width of about 113 km [9].

The area is southwesterly sloped. In the upper part of the study area, the slope is about 38 cm/km to about 29 cm/km [10]. The alluvial fill is more or less homogeneous in nature, and has little continuityvertically or laterally, indicating diverse depositional environments from time to timecaused by constant change in the stream courses [11,12].The alluvial sediments mainly consist of gray, a grayish brown, fine to medium sand, siltand clay. Gravel or very coarse sand is uncommon.

3 Experimental Section

Systematic soil samples were collected from four districts of the study area by using a stainless steel coring tool according to spacial grids of 24 km × 28 km. A Global Positioning System (GPS) was also used in order to record coordinates of sampling locations for the purpose of traceability of the sampling place [13, 14].The sampling area is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig-1.
Map of study area, northern alluvial sediment plains between Rivers Ravi and Chenab, Pakistan
pic

The chosen sampling sites were in open and plain land, covered with short-cropped grass, having moderate to good permeability and believed to be undisturbed for the last ten years, since these places were on un-cultivated land [15]. An area of 3 m×3 m was marked at every sampling location and the top 0.5 cm surface along with vegetation was removed prior to taking the sample. About 2 kg of soil sample comprising 5 cores was collected from selected area using coring device and was thoroughly mixed to prepare one representative sample. Pebbles, plant remains and other non relevant things were removed as per standard sampling methodology [16].These samples were packed into neat polyethylene bags and marked for later identification.

The samples were dried on polyethylene sheets at room temperature for one weekunder a controlled environment to avoid local dust contamination [17]. The samples were heated in an electric oven at 110oC up to 48 h in order to remove moisture contents. This time was found enough to attain constant sample weight. After drying process, the samples were crushed; ground/pulverized in order to attain a predetermined particle size as dictated by the analytical requirements.The treated samples were then passed through a sieve having 2 mm mesh size. Homogenized samples having weight of 200 g were taken and packed in plastic containers with same geometry as that of reference materials, as dictated by the calibration requirement [18, 19]. These containers were sealed hermetically in order to stop gas leakage as a result of overpressure produced inside by emanation of 222Rn from 226Ra decay. After ensuring establishment of secular equilibrium among the progenies of 238U and 232Th decay series, these sealed samples were ready for gamma counting. A period of thirty days was enough to ful fill this requirement.

Radiometric analysis of these samples was performed using PC based high resolution gamma spectrometry system [20]. It comprised of high purity germanium (HPGe) coaxial detector having relative efficiency 30% with respect to NaI(Tl) detector, active volume of 180 c3fitted with beryllium-end window. The energy resolution was 2.0 keV FWHM at 1332 keV from 60Co. The detector was shielded by 15 cm thick lead having inner lining of 3mm thick copper and 4 mm thick tin in order to reduce the background. The inner size of shielded cavity was 25 cm ×25 cm [21, 22]. The system was calibrated using IAEA soil-326 and reliability of counting efficiency was confirmed using IAEA soil-375 reference material. Samples were counted for 6.5×103 seconds and the accumulated spectral data was analyzed by commercially available software GENIE-2000, obtained from Canberra, USA. Concentrations of 226Ra,232Th, 40K and the fission product 137Cs were determined by using the gamma lines of 351.99 keV, 911.07 keV, 1460.75 keV and 661.62 keV respectively.

The terrestrial gamma radiation dose rate survey was performed by using the radiation dose rate meter from FAG Germany model FH40F4. It employed a G.M. tube as active detector having energy independent response from 45 keV to 1.3 MeV. The reliability of the dose rate meter results was assured by its calibration in the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL), PINSTECH, Pakistan, whose measurements are traceable to Primary Standard and are ensured by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) through postal dose inter-comparison [23].

The measurements were made 100 cm above the ground in open air. Ten readings were taken at each spot from where the soil sample taken and the average is recorded and their mean value was converted to absorbed dose rate in air (nGy h-1).

4 Results and Discussion

Radioactivity levels of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs measured in the soil of different areas collected in the present study are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.
Activity concentrations (Bq kg-1) of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs in soil samples of northern alluvial sediment plains between Rivers Ravi and Chenab, Pakistan.
Sr. No. Sampling location Latitude Longitude Activity concentration (Bq kg-1)
        226Ra 232Th 40K 137Cs
1. Gujranwala 32o 09/ N 74o 07/ E 32.8±1.5 41.8±2.7 480.2±19.5 2.1±0.1
2. Wazirabad 32o 28/ N 74o 05/ E 39.3±1.5 57.5±2.8 652.8±20.2 ≤MDA
3. Aiman Abad 32o 01/ N 74o 13/ E 31.7±1.1 49.8±2.7 465.9±19.5 1.6±0.1
4. Dhaunkal 32o 23/ N 74o 08/ E 51.5±1.2 61.5±2.8 695.9±20.3 3.2±0.2
5. Ahmad Nagar 32o 20/ N 73o 59/ E 38.6±1.2 53.5±2.8 566.5±19.9 1.8±0.1
6. Head Khanki 32o 22/ N 73o 59/ E 62.8±1.3 74.8±2.9 624.0±20.1 ≤MDA
7. Rasul Nagar 32o 19/ N 73o 47/ E 60.1±1.3 72.7±2.9 609.6±20.0 ≤MDA
8. Kalianwala 32o 17/ N 73o 44/ E 55.3±1.3 60.3±2.8 595.3±19.9 1.6±0.1
9. Kot Hara 32o 16/ N 73o 41/ E 47.5±1.2 63.1±2.8 537.7±19.8 ≤MDA
10. Rasulpur Tarar 32o 03/ N 73o 27/ E 44.5±1.6 59.5±2.8 638.4±20.1 1.8±0.1
11. Gajar Gola 32o 04/ N 73o 43/ E 54.3±1.6 59.1±2.8 739.0±20.5 ≤MDA
12. Uddowali 32o 06/ N 73o 54/ E 48.2±1.2 59.5±2.8 624.0±20.1 2.9±0.2
13. Qillah Didar Singh 32o 07/ N 73o 59/ E 43.8±1.2 59.1±2.8 638.4±20.1 ≤MDA
14. Nosherah Virkan 31o 59/ N 74o 09/ E 50.9±1.6 58.7±2.8 695.9±20.3 2.9±0.2
15. Kamoke 31o 56/ N 74o 13/ E 40.0±1.5 53.1±2.7 566.5±19.9 2.4±0.1
16. Sadhuke 31o 53/ N 74o 14/ E 56.6±1.3 67.5±2.9 695.9±20.3 ≤MDA
17. Manguke 31o 47/ N 74o 01/ E 53.9±1.2 62.3±2.8 739.0±20.5 4.7±0.2
18. Hafizabad 32o 03/ N 73o 42/ E 52.1±1.2 57.5±2.8 681.5±20.3 ≤MDA
19. Pindi Bhattian 31o 53/ N 73o 15/ E 51.5±1.2 67.9±2.9 595.3±19.9 ≤MDA
20. Winekay Tarar 32o 13/ N 73o 35/ E 46.5±1.7 61.5±2.8 667.2±20.2 1.6±0.1
21. Chak Bhatti 32o 05/ N 73o 24/ E 47.9±1.5 69.1±2.9 595.3±19.9 ≤MDA
22. Jalal Pur Nau 32o 03/ N 73o 23/ E 44.9±1.2 59.9±2.8 624.0±20.1 ≤MDA
23. Sukhay Ki 31o 49/ N 73o 35/ E 44.5±1.2 52.3±2.7 595.3±19.9 3.3±0.2
24. Kishan Garh 31o 47/ N 73o 26/ E 58.5±1.8 73.6±2.9 739.0±20.5 5.5±0.2
25. Sialkot 32o 27/ N 74o 33/ E 36.2±1.1 51.0±2.7 580.9±19.9 6.3±0.2
26. Sambrial 32o 30/ N 74o 20/ E 33.2±1.1 47.4±2.7 451.5±19.4 2.2±0.1
27. Kulu Wal 32o 34/ N 74o 21/ E 49.5±1.2 66.3±2.8 652.8±20.2 5.6±0.2
28. Head Marala 32o 40/ N 74o 28/ E 42.2±1.2 55.9±2.8 624.0±20.1 3.6±0.2
29. Chaprar 32o 34/ N 74o 29/ E 41.2±1.2 55.9±2.8 537.7±19.8 4.6±0.2
30. Chuvinda 32o 21/ N 74o 37/ E 36.9±1.1 60.7±2.8 609.6±20.0 8.1±0.3
31. Mundeki 32o 17/ N 74o 32/ E 43.0±1.2 69.9±2.9 695.9±20.3 3.8±0.2
32. Daska 32o 17/ N 74o 21/ E 46.0±1.2 60.3±2.8 638.4±20.1 4.2±0.2
33. Dharamkot 32o 11/ N 74o 22/ E 46.8±1.2 64.7±2.8 667.2±20.2 6.9±0.2
34. Sutra 32o 09/ N 74o 28/ E 40.8±1.2 56.3±2.8 480.2±19.5 ≤MDA
35. Merajke 32o 24/ N 74o46/ E 38.0±1.2 51.8±2.7 580.9±19.9 5.6±0.2
36. Norowal 32o 06/ N 74o 51/ E 37.5±1.1 59.1±2.8 667.2±20.2 2.0±0.1
37. Zafarwal 32o 20/ N 74o 55/ E 36.0±1.1 48.2±2.7 566.5±19.9 7.3±0.2
38. Chak Amro 32o15/ N 74o 08/ E 41.8±1.2 62.7±2.8 537.7±19.8 6.1±0.2
39. Noor Kot 32o 11/ N 74o 06/ E 39.9±1.2 59.9±2.8 537.7±19.8 3.0±0.2
40. Jassar 32o 05/ N 74o 55/ E 39.3±1.2 59.5±2.8 710.3±20.4 7.2±0.2
41. Talwindi Bhindran 32o 06/ N 74o 40/ E 39.2±1.2 60.3±2.8 566.5±19.9 ≤MDA
Show more

It can be seen in this table that the activity of 226Ra ranges from 31.7±1.1Bq kg-1 in Aiman Abad to 62.7±1.4 Bq kg-1 in Head Khanki. The activity of 232Th ranges from 41.8±2.7Bq kg-1 in Gujranwala to 74.8±2.9Bq kg-1 in Head Khanki. The activity of 40K ranges from 451.5±19.4Bq kg-1 in Sambrial to 739.0±20.5Bq kg-1 in Kishan Garh. The radioactivity level of artificial radionuclide 137Cs is found to be the maximum in Chuvinda (8.1±0.3Bq kg-1). The radioactivity levels of 40K are seen to be higher than those of 232Th and 226Ra at all the places of study area. In order to determine the existing ratio between the activity concentrations of three natural radionuclides in soil samples, correlations between them were drawn.

Figs. 2(a-c) represents correlations between the activity concentration of 226Ra and 232Th, 226Ra and 40K and 232Th and 40K respectively, with a trend line drawn among the data points using regression technique. In all the three cases, the regression was found linear and positive. A trend line is the most reliable when its R-squared value is at or close to 1. The correlation coefficient between 226Ra and 232Th is 0.6 where as between 226Ra and 40K and similarly between 232Th and 40K it is quite low. It indicates that 226Ra and 232Th come from a common origin where as 40K has source that is independent of both 226Ra and 232Th. However a positive correlation may still be attributed to property of the soil in retaining these radionuclides under varying weather conditions. The results shown in Table 1 also indicate that the mean value of 40K is the highest and that of 232Th is the lowest.

Fig. 2.
(a) Correlation between 226Ra and 232Th concentrations; (b) correlation between 226Ra and 40K concentrations; (c) correlation between 232Th and 40K concentrations.
pic

137Cs, although at very low concentrations, was detected at most of the places. Its concentration ranged from 1.6±0.1 to 8.1±0.3Bq kg-1 with an average value of 4.0±0.2 Bq kg-1. At some locations its concentration was quite low and less than minimum detectable activity (MDA; 1.4 Bq kg-1). 137Cs is one of the important fission products and is a prominent indicator of fall out from nuclear weapon tests during fifties and sixties of last century and the fallout due to the Chernobyl accident [8].

The statistics of the values measured for 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in the surface soil samples are enlisted in Table 2. Itshows the respective mean value, range, median, skewness, kurtosis coefficients and the type of theoretical frequency distribution that best fits each empirical distribution. It is observed that the values of skewness and kurtosis coefficients for 226Ra, 232Th and 40K activities and also in absorbed dose rates are closer to the null value, indicating the existence of normal distribution and the activityconcentration is practicallysymmetrical, as shown in Figs. 3(a–d).

Tabl-2.
Statistical data for radioactivity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and dose rate in surface soil samples from northern alluvial sediment plains, Pakistan
  Activity concentration (Bq kg-1) Dose rate (nGy h-1)
  226Ra 232Th 40K
Mean 45.00 59.64 613.84 85.09
Std. Dev. 7.737 7.149 74.38 9.83
Median 44.47 59.48 624.01 85.65
Skewness 0.406 -0.014 -0.297 -0.239
Kurtosis -0.498 0.273 -0.368 -0.009
Range 31.74 – 62.77 41.80 – 74.75 451.47 – 739.04 62.30 – 105.44
Frequency Distribution Normal Normal Normal Normal
Show more
Fig-3.
Frequency distribution of the activities of (a) 226Ra, (b) 232Th, (c) 40K (Bq kg-1 dry weight) and d) calculated terrestrial absorbed dose rate at 100 cm above ground (nGy h-1).
pic

The existence of a wide range in the variation of the activities of radionuclide’s is also observed (Table 2). This is due to thewide variety of lithological components existing in the zone under study.

We have also calculated gamma dose rate (D) in the outdoor air at 100cm above the ground level using the conversion factor published in UNSCEAR 1988 [24]. To do so, the following equation[25]was used

D= (6.62CTh+4.27CRa+0.43CK) ×1010Gy h10 (1)

where CTh, CRa and CK are the average activity concentrations of thorium, radium and potassium, respectively. The absorbed dose rate ranges from 62.3 nGy h-1 in Gujranwala to 105.4nGy h-1 in Kishan Garh. One of the objectives of measuring radioactivities was to make an estimate of radiation dose likely to be delivered to the general public externally.

The in-situ gamma dose rate at 100cm above the ground has also been measured using an environmental radiation dose rate meter (FAG). The average measured gamma dose rate is 109.05 nGy h-1. The average dose rate calculated from soil measurements for the same area is 85.09 nGy h-1, which is less than the in-situ measurements as shown in Fig. 4. It was observed that measured absorbed dose rate values are 1.2 to 1.3 times higher than the calculated values.This difference is expected as FAG dose rate meter is also responsive to cosmic rays, high energy beta particles and X-rays.

Fig-4.
Comparison of measured and calculated dose rates in study area, northern alluvial sediment plains between Rivers Ravi and Chenab, Pakistan
pic

As shown in Table 3, the mean activity of 226Ra measured in the soil of study area (45.0±1.3 Bq kg-1) is higher than that of many countries like Venezuela [26] and Taiwan [27] etc. However, it is lower than that of Turkey [28] and Indian Punjab and Himachal Pradesh [29].The World average [30] is also higher than the values determined in present study. Some Pakistani areas like Lahore [31], Punjab Province [32], Southern Punjab [33] and Mirpur Azad Kashmir [34] have lower226Ra level than northern alluvial sediment plains, Pakistan.

Table-3.
Activity concentrations (Bq kg-1) of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs in soil samples reported from different countries of the world.
Area Mean activity concentration (Bq kg-1) Dose rate (nGy h-1) Reference
  226Ra 232Th 40K 137Cs    
Turkey 79 62 574 - 100 [27]
Indian Punjab and Himachal Pradesh 56.74 87.42 143.04 - 86.54 [28]
Taiwan 30 44 431 - 54 [26]
Venezuela 27 31 357 5 - [25]
World Average 50 50 500 - 70 [29]
Southern Punjab, Pakistan 21.7 31.1 393.2 1.6 46.1 [32]
Punjab Province, Pakistan 35 41 615 - 68 [31]
Lahore, Pakistan 25.8 49.2 561.6 - 65 [30]
Northern alluvial sediment plains, Pakistan 45.0 59.6 613.8 4.0 85.1 Present study
Show more

Similarly, the level of 232Th in northern alluvial sediment plains is 59.6±2.8Bq kg-1. Its values are more than those in Taiwan, Venezuela and world average but lower than that of IndianPunjab and Himachal Pradesh and Turkey.

To check and calculate how much effective dose equivalent will be received by the public due to activity in soil, the annual effective dose was calculated using the formula [35];

Eair=TQDair×106 (2)

where D is the absorbed dose rate in air, Q the conversion factor of 0.7 Sv Gy-1, which converts the absorbed dose in air to human effective dose in adults and T the time in hours for 1 y, i.e. 8760 h [36].The calculated values of annual effective dose (E) for all samples are shown in Table-2 Annual effective dose lies in the range 0.22-0.37 mSv with a mean of 0.30 mSv.

5 Conclusion

This is the first systematic study to establish a baseline data of primordial and anthropogenic radionuclide’s in the Rechna Doab, Pakistan. In future to make the studymore comprehensive, the grid size to collect soil samples can be reduced to obtain the background radiation levels which are relatively more representative of the area. A study can be made to know the levels of NORMS in soils which are being used largely through phosphate fertilizers and industries dumping their effluents in thesoil. On the basis of our results we conclude that the soil of the study area do not pose any radiological health hazard to the public of the area.

References
1 Collado G M.

Radionuclide Concentrations in Soils

. In: M Pöschl, L M. L. Nollet (Eds.), Radionuclide Concentrations in Food and the Environment, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2006,ISBN 9780849335945.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2 Cooper J R, Randle K. Sokhi R S. Radioactive releases in the environment: impact and assessment, John Wiley & Sons, England, 2003, ISBN 0-471-89924-0.
3 Papp Z, Dezso Z and Daroczy S.

Measurement of the radioactivity of 238U, 232Th, 226Ra, 137Cs and 40K in soils using direct Ge (Li) γ-ray spectrometry

. J Radioanal Nucl Chem., 1997,222:171-176, DOI: 10.1007/BF02034265.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4 Burford E P, Fomina M, Gadd G M.

Fungal involvement in bio weathering and bio transformation of rocks and minerals

. Mineralogical Magazine. 2003, 67(6):1127-1155, DOI: 10.1180/0026461036760154.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5 Matiullah , Ahad A, Rehman S U, Rehman S U and Faheem M.

Measurement of radioactivity in soil samples of Bahawalpur division, Pakistan

. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2004, 112: 443-447, DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch409.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6 Eisenbud M and Paschoa A S.

Environmental radioactivity

. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 1989, 280(2-3), DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(89)90953-4.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7 Hamid B N, Chowdhury M I, Alam M N and Islam M N.

Study of natural radionuclide concentrations in an area of elevated radiation background in the northern districts of Bangladesh

, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2002.98: 227-230.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8 Rafique M.

Cesium-137 activity concentrations in soil and brick samples of Mirpur, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan

. International Journal of Radiation Research. 2014, 12(1): 39-46.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9 Khan M A. Hydrogeological data, Rechna Doab.Vol. 1. Publication Number 25, Lahore Pakistan, Project planning organization (NZ) Water and Power Development Authority Pakistan, 1978.
10 Greenman D W, Swarzenski W V and Bonnett GD. Ground Water Hydrology of Punjab with Emphasis on Problems Caused by Canal Irrigation (Water and Soil; Investigation Division Bulletin 6, WAPDA, Pakistan, 1967).
11 Kidwai Z U. The Geology of Rechna and Chaj Doab (Bulletin 5, WASID, WAPDA, Pakistan. 1962).
12 Sajjad M I, Akram, W, Tasneem M A, Hussain SD, Ahmad M and Iqbal M Z.

Environmental isotopic and geochemical study of groundwater salinization in Rechna Doab

. Nuclear Science Journal, 37(4) 2000, 273-278.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13 Jabbar A, Bhatti A S, Ahmad S S, Arshed W and Akhter P.

Assessment of environmental gamma dose in northern Rechna Doab in Pakistan

. Nuc. Tech. and Rad. Protec., 2009, 24:56-60, DOI: 10.2298/NTRP0901056J.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14 Jabbar A, Arshed W, Bhatti A S, Ahmad S S, Rehman SU and Dilband M.

Measurement of soil radioactivity levels and radiation hazard assessment in mid Rechna interfluvial region

, Pakistan J Radioanal Nucl Chem., 2010, 283: 371, DOI: 10.1007/s10967-009-0357-3.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15 Annual book of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards, C-998-90. Standard practice for sampling surface soil for radionuclides (1995).
16 International Atomic Energy Agency,

Measurement of Radionuclides in Food and the Environment (Technical Report Series No. 295

, IAEA, Vienna, 1989).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17 Annual book of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards, C-999-90, Standard practice for soil sample preparation for the determination of radionuclides (1995).
18 Jabbar A, Aslam M, Orfi S D and Rashid A.

Be7 concentration in some vegetation samples collected from southern Punjab

. The Nucleus, 2001, 38(2): 111-113.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19 Aslam M, Orfi S D, Khan K and Jabbar A.

Radioanalytical significance of Pakistani marble used for construction of dwellings

. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2002, 253: 483-487, DOI: 10.1023/A:1020438007471.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20 Debertin K and Helmer F G. Gamma and X-ray Spectrometry with Semiconductor Detectors (North Holland1988).
21 Heusser G, Klapdor H V, Ptepki A, Schneider J, Mansour N and Strecker H.

Construction of a low level Ge detector.

Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1989, 40:393.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22 Westmeier W.

Techniques and problems of low level gamma ray spectrometry

,Appl.Radiat.Isot.1992. 43:305
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23 International Atomic Energy Agency,

Technical report series no. 110, Manual of dosimetry in radiotherapy

(IAEA, Vienna 1970).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiations (UNSCEAR),

Sources and effects and risks of ionizing radiation Report to the General Assembly with annexure

(United Nations, New York, 1988).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25 Ali S, Tufail M, Jamil K, Ahmad A and Khan H A.

Gamma ray activity and dose rate of brick samples from some areas of North West Frontier Province (NWFP)

, Pakistan Sci. Total. Environ.,1996,187: 247-251, DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(96)05109-1.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26 LaBrecque J J.

Distribution of 137Cs, 40K, 238U and 232Th in soils from Northern Venezuela

. J Radioanalytical Nucl Chem, 1994. 178: 327-336, DOI: 10.1007/BF02039726.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27 Lin Y M, Lin P H, Chen C J and Huang C C.

Measurement of terrestrial gamma radiation in Taiwan, Republic of China

. Health Phys., 1987, 52: 805-811.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28 Baykara O and Dogru M.

Détermination of terrestrial gamma, 238U, 232Th and 40K in soil along fracture zones

. Radiat. Meas. 2009.44: 116-119, DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.10.001.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29 Singh S, Rani A and Mahajan R K.

226Ra, 232Th and 40K analysis in soil samples from some areas of Punjab and Himachal Pradesh, India using gamma ray spectroscopy

. Radiat Meas. 2005, 39: 431-439, DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.09.003.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30 UNSCEAR, Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (United Nations, New York: 2000).
31 Akhtar N, Tufail M, Ashraf M and Iqbal M M.

Measurement of environmental radioactivity for estimation of radiation exposure from saline soil of Lahore, Pakistan

. Radiat. Meas. 2005. 39: 11-14.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32 Tahir S N A, Jamil K, Zaidi J H, Arif M, Ahmed N and Ahmad S A.

Measurement of activity concentrations of naturally occurring radionuclides in soil samples from Punjab province of Pakistan and assessment of radiological hazards

. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2005.113: 421-7, DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch484.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33 Fatima I, Zaidi J H, Arif M, Daud M, Ahmad S A and Tahir S N A.

Measurement of natural radioactivity and dose rate assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation in the soil of southern Punjab

. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2008. 128: 206-212 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncm310.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34 Rafique M, Rehman H, Matiullah , Malik F, Rajput M, Rahman S U and Rathore M H.

Assessment of radiological hazards due to soil and building materials used in Mirpur Azad Kashmir, Pakistan

. International Journal of Radiation Research, 2011, 9(2): 77-87.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35 Matiullah , Ahad A, Rehman S and Mirza L M.

Indoor radon levels and lung cancer risk estimates in seven cities of the Bahawalpur division, Pakistan

, Radiat. Prot. Dosim.,2003.107: 269-276.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36 The 1990-1991 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Publications