logo

Geant4 simulation of 238U(n,f) reaction induced by D-T neutron source

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Geant4 simulation of 238U(n,f) reaction induced by D-T neutron source

Chang-Lin Lan
Meng Peng
Yi Zhang
Zheng Wei
Ze-En Yao
Bao-Lin Xie
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.28, No.1Article number 8Published in print 01 Jan 2017Available online 01 Dec 2016
39404

Knowledge of actinides (n,f) fission process induced by neutron is of importance in the field of nuclear power and nuclear engineering, especially for reactor applications. In this work, fission characteristics of 238U(n,f) reaction induced by D-T neutron source were simulated with Geant4 code from multiple perspectives, including the fission production yields, total nubar, kinetic energy distribution, fission neutron spectrum and cumulative γ-ray spectrum of the fission products. The simulation results agree well with the experimental nuclear reaction data (EXFOR) and evaluated nuclear data (ENDF). Mainly, this work was to examine the rationality of the parametric nuclear fission model in Geant4, and to direct our future experimental measurements for the cumulative fission yields of 238U(n,f) reaction.

Fission characteristicsGeant4 code238U(n,f) reactionD-T neutron sourceDecayed γ-ray spectrum

1 Introduction

Fission characteristics of actinides induced by neutrons are important for reactor applications. In particular, the neutron induced fission data of 235U, 238U and 239Pu has a significant application in conventional light water reactors, heavy water reactors and fast reactors [1,2]. Among the three actinides, 238U is associated with 235U in conventional reactor and correlate to 239Pu in fast reactor. The knowledge of 238U(n,f) fission reaction induced by neutron at around 14 MeV produced by a D-T neutron source has a wide range of applications, such as accelerator-driven sub-critical systems [3-6], thorium-based molten-salt reactors [7], nuclear transmutation system [8], fission reaction rate measurement [9] and nuclear structure research. For these applications, detail information of the fission cross-section, fission-fragment mass, kinetic energy distributions, fission neutron spectrum and γ-ray spectrum are key observables. So far, the measured FPY (Fission Product Yield) for 238U (n,f) reaction induced by neutrons mainly came from early experiment in low energy region. The investigation of their dependence on production rates of secondary long-lived fission residues and neutron-rich isotopes may not only reveal valuable information about the shape of the nuclear potential energy landscape around the saddle point, but also provide reliable fission data for further experimental study and the nuclear facility design.

The FPY of 238U changes with the neutron spectrum and flux, irradiation time etc. The methods to measure the fission products include radiochemistry, mass spectrometry, direct γ-spectroscopy [10,11], line isotope separation etc. Now, it is possible to simulate nuclear reaction process with a Monte Carlo transport code — Geant4 version 9.6.4 (GEometry And Tracking code) [12,13]. As a new tool for simulating the 238U fission reaction induced by D-T neutron source, Geant4 has been used in high energy physics, space, medical, nuclear experiments and accelerator physics [14,15]. In a simulation, necessary particles and physical processes were constructed to set up the physics framework. For fission processes of 238U, the G4NeutronHPElastic model, G4NeutronHPInelastic model, G4Decay model, G4NeutronHPCapture model and G4ParaFissionModel model were specifically selected to describe the elastic scattering, inelastic scattering, decay process, neutron capture and neutron-induced fission, respectively.

Many authors have reported their researches on the characteristic of FPY distribution for 238U(n,f) reaction induced by neutron [11,16-26], and evaluation database [27], such as ENDF/B-VII.1, JEFF/FPY-2011, JENDL-4.0, and GEFY-3.3 are available. However, many provided just segmental fission nuclides or fission yield distribution. In this paper, typical simulation results are compared with experimental data [28] and evaluation data to evaluate the physics model in Geant4, in an attempt to understand characteristic of 238U(n,f) fission reaction, and guide our future measurements for the cumulative fission yields of 238U(n,f) reaction induced by D-T neutrons using the direct γ-spectroscopy method.

2 Simulations

2.1 The incident neutron spectrum

Fast neutron generators are used world-wide for all kinds of purposes, such as nuclear data measurement, radiation hardening and radioactive breeding etc. The neutrons from D-T neutron generator are suitable for inducing fission reactions research. Lanzhou University has developed an intense neutron generator based on T(d,n)4He reaction with a rotating target, to generate 14.0 MeV mono-energetic neutrons by 300 keV deuteron beams from an accelerator. The fast neutrons produced with a thick target have distinct angular distribution and intrinsic energy spectrum [29]. For an incident deuteron energy Ed, the neutron spectrum with a given angle θ and energy E can be calculated by Eq.(1)[30]:

dY2dEndΩn=N0E0[dσ2dEndΩn](Ed,θn)[dEddx]1×exp(EdE0non(E')[dEddx]1dE')dEd, (1)

where, d2Y/(dEndΩn) is the double differential thick target neutron yields, N is atomic number density of the target, d2σ/(dEndΩn) is the neutron-produced double differential cross-section, E0 is the incident deuteron energy, Ed is the deuteron energy in the target, dEd/dx is the stopping power of the target, and ∑non(E') is the macroscopic total reaction cross-section. In this work, we calculated the neutron spectrum with incident deuteron beams of 260 keV, as shown in Fig.1.

Fig.1
The outgoing neutron energy spectrum distribution of D-T neutron source
pic
2.2 Sample

Uranium dioxide (100.0% purity) was used as the target. In order to determine optimum thickness of the 238U sample, we chose 128Te and 92Zr as representative nuclides to calculate the different share of fission fragments deposition, as function of the sample thickness. As shown in Fig.2, the deposition share reaches more than 99.90 % at 0.8 mm thickness, where it begins changing slowly with the thickness. Therefore, 1.0 mm target thickness (over 99.95 % fragments deposition share in the sample) was selected.

Fig.2
Simulated deposition share of the fission-fragments, as function of target thickness.
pic

A hollow cylindrical target of Φ20 mm in wall thickness of 1.0 mm was used in the simulation. The target was positioned on the deuteron beam axis. Fission products identified in each step of nuclear reaction inside the sample were considered in Geant4, whereas fission neutrons and decay γ-rays were recorded in the entire 4π steradian.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Fission yields distribution

The FPY distribution is a key to fission reaction. In the 238U(n,f) fission process, the fission fragments were simulated in their independent and cumulative yields. The former considered the initial fission-fragment yields only, while the latter took all the fission products including the initial fragments and the β-decayed nuclides from the excited state of fission-fragments.

The independent FPY yields vs. Z and N is shown in Fig.3. The fission fragments spread over upper left of the β-stability line in charge number Z= 35–55 and neutron number N= 60–85, then decay to the bottom of the stability ground state.

Fig.3
Independent yields distribution of the 238U(n,f) fission reaction induced by D-T neutrons. The color scale refers to the number of events.
pic

The simulated independent FPY distribution was compared with the nuclear data from ENDF/B-VII.I library. As shown in Fig.4, they agree well with each other. According to the nuclear fission theory, the pre-neutron emission mass distribution of neutron-induced antinides can be treated as symmetrical fission which obeys to certain specific rules. As a result, the heavy and light fission-fragment masses have their own symmetrical peak. The heavy-mass peak in fragment-mass distributions is roughly constant and close to A2=140, and the complementary light-mass peak in fragment-mass distributions can be calculated by A1=AfA2, where Af is the fission nucleus mass number. There is a deep valley in symmetrical fission-fragment mass distribution center position A0=Af/2. From our simulation, the heavy-mass peak in fragment-mass distributions is at A2=137, corresponding with the Five-dimensional energy landscapes model [31],which gives a less deviation (<5%) than the phenomenological fission potential model [32] that assumes A2=140 for the mass number of heavy fragment. 10−4

Fig. 4
Comparison of independent FPY from 238U (n, f) reaction between the calculated and recommended data. (a) The elemental yield versus charge number. (b) The mass chain yield versus mass number.
pic

In Fig. 5, the calculated cumulative FPY distributions for isobaric chain are compared with the experimental data from EXFOR and the evaluated data from ENDF/B-VII.1. In Fig.5(a), the calculated results agree well with the evaluated data, but are higher than the experimental data within error bars. In Fig. 5(b), the three data sets are of good consistency in a wide range, but for A<75 and A>160, our calculation results are lower than the evaluated data.

Fig. 5
Calculated FPY of 238U (n,f) reaction as function of the charge number (a) and mass number (b), comparing with the recommended data.
pic

In the 238U(n, f) reaction induced by 14 MeV neutrons, the yields of light fission fragment around mass number of 94 and the heavy fission fragment around mass number 140 are found to be higher because of the nuclear structure effects and suitable N/Z values. Meanwhile, the FPY distribution does not have a third peak around symmetric mass region, due to the lower excitation energy of 238U(n,f) reaction induced by 14 MeV neutrons, leading to asymmetric fission of fission-fragment with mass number. So, the physical models in Geant4 code are suitable for simulating the neutron-induced fission process for actinide nuclide.

3.2 Fission-fragment kinetic energy distribution

In the fission reaction process of 238U induced by fast neutrons, the 238U nucleus splits into two fission fragments with high kinetic energies. They separate and fly away under the action of Coulomb repulsion. Fig.6 shows the relationship between the kinetic energy and mass number of the fission fragments. The nuclides with magic number of nucleons are much more than other fission fragments. The primary kinetic energy of each heavy fission fragment is in the order of 50–110 MeV, which means that the primary fission fragments can be in velocities of 107 m/s, before they slow down via elastic-scatting inside the uranium sample. The huge kinetic energy of fission fragment transforms into the thermal energy or emits a light particle to ground-state in de-excitation process and releases its kinetic energy in elastic-scatting process, which is important for reactor design especially in selecting reactor materials.

Fig.6
The primary FPY kinetic energy distribution from 238U(n,f) reaction induced by D-T neutrons. The color scale refers to the number of events.
pic

Figure 7 shows the average and total fission-fragment kinetic energies as function of the mass number. According to the momentum conservation law, the light fission-fragments have higher kinetic energy and the heavy have lower kinetic energy. The total kinetic energy is the sum of kinetic energies of a complementary fragment pair. From Fig.7 (b), the total kinetic energy of heavy fission-fragment reaches to the maximum value at mass number of 132 due to the nuclear shell structure effects. The structure of fission fragment with mass number of 132 (Z=50, A=82) approximates a sphere that help to minimize the center-to-center distance of two fission fragments contributes to bigger fission fragment kinetic energy.

Fig.7.
The relationship between the fission-fragment kinetic energy distribution and the fission-fragment mass number. (a) The average kinetic energy distribution. (b) The total kinetic energy distribution.
pic
3.3 Fission neutron spectrum

The fission neutron spectrum, including prompt and delayed neutrons, is of importance in basic research and reactor design. The prompt neutrons are mainly evaporated by the primary neutron-rich fission fragments far from the β-stability line, with high excited energy. They account for over 99% of the total fission neutrons. The delayed neutrons are produced from the β-ray decayed of fission fragments. Fig.8 shows the neutron spectrum from the 238U(n,f) reaction induced by D-T neutrons.

Fig.8
The fission neutron spectrum of 238U(n,f) reaction induced by D-T neutrons.
pic

The total fission neutron energy distribution obeys Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, which can be calculated by:

f(E)=n0(E/π)1/2(kT)3/2eE/(kT), (2)

where, f(E) is the fission neutron energy spectrum, E is the neuron energy, parameter kT = 1.38 is the Maxwell temperature, and n0 = 2.11×10−6 is the proportional coefficient of the function.

We also calculated the total nubar (the average fission-neutron count) of 238U(n,f) reaction at different energies of the incident neutron beams. The results are compared with experimental data in Ref. [33] (Fig.9). The average fission-neutron count (νn) changes mainly with the cross-section of 238U(n,f) reaction, in a positive correlation with incident neutron energy. The excitation energy of 238U fission system increases with the incident neutron energy as more neutrons are evaporated immediately in the order of 10-15s.

Fig.9.
The total nubar of 238U (n,f) reaction as function of the incident neutron energy.
pic
3.4 Decay γ-ray spectrum of 238U (n, f) reaction

In the neutron-induced fission reaction, the residual nucleus emits characteristic γ-ray in its de-excitation process, and can be thus identifies by analyzing the decay γg-ray spectrum. The cumulative γ-ray spectra of fission products from 238U(n,f) reaction induced by D-T neutron source, of different cooling times, are shown in Fig.10.

Fig.10
The cumulative γ-ray spectrum from 238U fission reaction with different cooling time.
pic

The precise fission-fragment γ-ray data of fission productions [34] for analyzing fission yield is partly presented in Table.1. It is possible to distinguish over 34 fission products (Fig.10) of different half-lives using correlative calculation process [35]. This is helpful for our future experimental measurements for the cumulative fission yields of 238U(n,f) reaction.

Table. 1
The characteristic γ-ray of partly fission nuclide for fission reaction of 238U(n,f).
Nuclides Half-life γ-ray energy (keV) γ-ray intensity (%) Nuclides Half-life γ-ray energy (keV) γ-ray intensity (%)
78Ge 1.45 h 277.3 96.0 127gSn 2.10 h 1095.6 19.0
84Br 31.8 min 881.6 41.6     1114.3 38.0
85mKr 4.48 h 151.0 75.2 128gSb 9.01 h 754.0 100.0
    304.5 14.0 129Sb 4.32 h 812.8 43.5
87Kr 76.3 min 402.7 49.7 130gSb 40.0 min 330.9 78.0
88Kr 2.84 h 196.3 26.3 132I 2.30 h 522.7 16.7
    834.8 13.1     667.7 13.9
89Rb 15.4 min 1,031.9 63.6 132Te 78.2 h 228.2 88.1
91Sr 9.48 h 652.9 11.1 133mTe 55.4 min 647.4 15.6
    749.8 23.0     912.6 45.8
    1,024.3 32.5 133gI 20.8 h 529.9 87.0
92Sr 2.71 h 1383.9 90.0 134I 52.6 min 595.4 11.1
95Zr 64.02 d 756.7 55.4     677.3 7.8
97Zr 16.7 h 743.4 92.7     1,136.2 9.2
98Nb 53.4 min 787.4 93.4 135I 6.61 h 1131.5 22.5
99Mo 66 h 140.5 5.70     1260.4 28.6
103Ru 39.3 d 497.1 90.9 140La 40.2 h 1596.5 95.5
105Rh 35.4 h 318.9 19.2 141La 3.93 h 1354.3 2.63
112Pd 21.1 h 617.4 49.9 142La 1.55 h 641.2 53.0
    1387.7 6.24     894.8 9.40
112Ag 3.13 h 617.5 13.0 143Ce 33.0 h 293.3 43.4
113Ag 5.37 h 316.1 1.29 149Nd 1.728 h 211.3 27.3
115gCd 53.5 h 527.9 27.5     270.2 10.7
117mCd 3.40 h 1065.9 23.1 151Pm 53.08 h 340.8 23.0
127mTe 9.35 h 88.2 0.086 153Sm 46.28 h 103.2 30.0
Show more

4 Conclusion

The characteristic of 238U(n,f) reaction induced by neutron around 14 MeV have been investigated using the Monte Carlo program Geant4 for the first time. The fission production yields distribution, fission-fragments kinetic energy distribution, total nubar, fission neutron spectrum and decayed γg-ray spectrum were represented and discussion. Meanwhile, the calculated values of independent yield and cumulative FPY distribution were compared with the obtainable experimental and evaluation data. The calculation results indicates that the Geant4 code with the parametric nuclear fission model is scientific rationality and able to predict the following experimental measurement of 238U(n,f) reaction.

1) The calculated results of independent yield and cumulative FPY distribution versus the charge and mass number are in good agreement with the datum from EXFOR and ENDFB-VII.1, which indicates that the Geant4 code with the fission model can simulate 238U(n,f) reaction induced by D-T fast neutron precisely. The calculated result is useful for our experimental measurement preparation.

2) The computational result of fission-fragment kinetic energy distribution conforms to the momentum conservation law. The kinetic energy of fission-fragment with magic nucleus is higher with the nuclear shell effect. The fission neutron spectrum obeys the Boltzmann distribution.

3) The cumulative γ-ray spectrum can be used to identify the kinds and yields of fission products with the characteristic energy and intensity of γ-ray. It will direct us to acquire the information of FPY in following experimental measurement.

All of the above, the fission physical models in Geant4 provide us a new way to calculate the fission process, analyze the experimental data and extending the nuclear evaluation data as well as reactor engineering design. It lays a good foundation for measure the cross sections and fission yields from 238U(n,f) reaction with direct γ-spectroscopy method.

References
[1] T. R. Allen, D. C. Crawford.

Lead-cooled fast reactor systems and the fuels and materials challenges

. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install, 2007, Article ID 97486. DOI: 10.1155/2007/97486
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] J. Krepel, S. Pelloni, K. Mikityuk.

Comparison of open and closed U-Pu equilibrium fuel cycles for Generation-IV fast reactors with the EQL3D procedure

. Nucl. Eng. Des, 2012, 250: 392-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.06.004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] X. Cao, Z.X. He, C.R. Qing, et al.

Feasibility study of 233U production with accelerator driven sub-critical system (in Chinese)

. Sci Sin-Phys Mech Astron, 2012, 42: 437-444. DOI: 10.1360/132012-205
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] Nuclear Energy Agency Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Accelerator-driven Systems (ADS) and Fast Reactors (FR) in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles

. http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/reports/2002/nea3109-ads.pdf
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] The European Technical Working Group on ADS (2001).

A European roadmap for developing accelerator driven systems (ADS) for nuclear waste incineration

. http://www.oecd-nea.org/pt/docs/ADS%20ROADMAP.pdf
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] H. Nifenecker, S. David, J.M. Loiseaux, et al.

Basics of accelerator driven subcritical reactors

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2001, 463(3): 428-467. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00160-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] J.J.L. Yoonjo, P.S. Matthew, C. K. John et al.

Thorium fuel cycle for a molten salt reactor: State of Missouri feasibility study

. 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN (2014). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2828.6803
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8]

Transmutation of radioactive waste

. http://www.oecd-nea.org/trw/
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] X.X. Chen, Z.D. Fan, Y. Wang, et al.

Experimental research of 238U fission reaction rate in China Experimental Fast Reactor

. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2013,47:120-122. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2013.47.so.0120 (in Chinese)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] W.M.D. Jesse.

Gamma-ray spectroscopy by direct crystal diffraction

. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci, 1958, 8:163-180. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ns.08.120158.001115
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] T. Granier, R.O. Nelson, T. Ethvignot, et al.

Measurement of prompt X-rays in 238U (n, f) from threshold to 400 MeV

. Eur. Phys. J. A, 2013, 49: 114. DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2013-13114-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12]

CERN (2013) Geant4 Installation Guide: Building and installing Geant4 for users and developers

. http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/UserDocumentation/UsersGuides/InstallationGuide/fo/BookInstalGuide.pdf
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13]

Physics Reference Manual (2012)

http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/UserDocumentation/UsersGuides/PhysicsReferenceManual/BackupVersions/V9.6/fo/PhysicsReferenceManual.pdf
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] X. Qin, R. Zhou, J.F. Han, et al.

GEANT4 simulation of the characteristic gamma-ray spectrum of TNT under soil induced by DT Neutrons

. Nucl. Sci. Tech, 2015,26(1):42-47. DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.26.010501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] Z. Wei, Z.E. Yao, C.L. Lan, et al.

Monte Carlo simulation of fission yields, kinetic energy, fission neutron spectrum and decay γ-ray spectrum for 232Th(n,f) reaction induced by 3H(d,n)4He neutron source

. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 2015, 305(2):455-462. DOI: 10.1007/s10967-014-3910-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] D. J. Gorman, R. H. Tomlinson.

Cumulative yields in the 14-MeV neutron fission of 238U

. Can. J. Chem, 1968, 46: 1663-1672.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] L. H. Gevaert, R. E. Jerv, H. D. Sharma.

Cumulative yields in the 14 MeV neutron fission of 232Th and 238U in the symmetric region

. Can. J. Chem, 1970, 48: 641-651.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] W.X. Li, T.Y. Sun, X.H. Sun, et al.

Charge distribution in the fission of 238U by 14.7 MeV neutron

. Nuclear Chemistry and Radiochemistry, 1980, 2: 9-16. (in Chinese)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] C. Chung, M.Y. Woo.

Fission product yields in the fast-neutron fission of 238U

. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 1987, 109: 117-131.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] N. Gharibyan, K.J. Moody, J.D. Despotopulos.

First fission yield measurements at the National Ignition Facility: 14-MeV neutron fission of 238U

. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 2014, 303(2): 1335-1338.DOI: 10.1007/s10967-014-3474-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] E. Dobreva, N. Nenoff.

Yields of fission products with nasses A=131 to 135 for the fast neutron induced fission of U-238

. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 1984, 81(1): 29-36.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] H. Naik, S. Mukerji, R. Crasta, et al.

Measurement of fission product yields in the quasi-mono-energetic neturon-induced fission of 238U

. Nucl. Phys. A, 2015, 941: 16-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.05.006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] J. Laurec, A. Adam, T. de, et al.

Fission product yields of 233U, 235U, 238U and 239Pu in fields of thermal neutrons, fission meutrons and 14.7-MeV neutrons

. Nuclear Data Sheets, 2010, 111: 2965-2980. DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2010.11.004
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] H.D. Selby, M.R. Mac Innes, D.W. Barr, et al.

Fission product data measured at Los Alamos for fission spectrum and thermal neutrons on 239Pu, 235U, 238U

. Nuclear Data Sheets, 2010, 111: 2891-2922. DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2010.11.002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] M. Mac Innes, M.B. Chadwick, T. Kawano.

Fission product yields for 14 MeV neutrons on 235U, 238U and 239Pu

. Nuclear Data Sheets, 2011, 112: 3135-3152. DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.009
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] T. EthvignotT. GranierP. Casoli, et al.

Experimental studies of prompt neutron and photon emission in intermediate energy neutron-induced fission

, Fission & Properties of Neutron-rich Nuclei2003:418-425. DOI: 10.1142/9789812705211_0060 
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[27]

ENDF: Evaluated Nuclear Data File

. https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/endf.htm
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[28]

IAEA-EXFOR Database

. https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/exfor.htm
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[29] Z.E. Yao, W.M. Yue, P. Luo, et al.

Neutron Yield, Energy spectrum and angular distribution of accelerator-based T(d, n) 4He reaction neutron source for thick target

. Atom. Energy Sci. Technol, 2008, 42(5): 400-403.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[30] K. Hirabayashi, T. Nishizawa, H. Uehara.

Measurement of neutron yields from thick Al and SUS304 targets bombarded by 5-MeV and 9-MeV deuterons

. Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology, 2012, 3: 60-64. DOI: 10.15669/pnst.3.60
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[31] P. Moller, D. G. Madland, A. J. Sierk, et al.

Nuclear fission modes and fragment mass asymmetries in a five-dimensional deformation space

. Nature, 2001, 409(6822):785-790. DOI: 10.1038/35057204
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[32] X.J. Sun, C.G. Yu, N. Wang.

Pre-neutron-emission mass distributions for low-energy neutron-induced actinide fission

. Physical Review C, 85, 014613 (2012). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.014613
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[33] F. Manero,V.A. Konshin.

Status of the energy dependent nu-values for the heavy isotopes (Z>90) from thermal to 15 MeV and nu-values for spontaneous fission

. At. Energy Rev, 1972, 10(4):637-756.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[34]

Interactive Chart of Nuclides

. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[35] Z. Li, A. Z. Cui, D.M. Liu, et al.

Precise determination of yields of 95Zr, 140Ba and 147Nd (in Chinese)

. Journal of Nuclear and Radiochemistry,1995, 17(2): 65-72.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar