logo

DNA origami templated assembly of plasmonic nanostructures with enhanced Raman scattering

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

DNA origami templated assembly of plasmonic nanostructures with enhanced Raman scattering

Meng-Zhen Zhao
Xu Wang
Yi-Kang Xing
Shao-Kang Ren
Nan Teng
Jun Wang
Jie Chao
Lian-Hui Wang
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.29, No.1Article number 6Published in print 01 Jan 2018Available online 21 Dec 2017
64400

DNA origami have been established as versatile templates to fabricate plasmonic nanostructures in predefined shapes and multiple dimensions. Limited to the size of DNA origami, which are approximate to 100 nm, it is hard to assemble more intricate plasmonic nanostructures in large scale. Herein, we used rectangular DNA origami as the template to anchor two 30 nm gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) which induced dimers nanostructures. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showed the assembly of AuNPs with high yields. Using the linkers to organize the DNA origami templates into nanoribbons, chains of AuNPs were obtained, which was validated by the TEM images. Furthermore, we observed a significant Raman signal enhancement from molecules covalently attached to the AuNP-dimers and AuNP-chains. Our method opens up the prospects of high ordered plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical properties.

DNA origamiGold NanoparticlesSurface enhanced Raman scattering

I. Introduction

Plasmonic nanostructures have induced more attention because of their potential applications including biosensing [1-3], harvesting energy [4-8], and sub-diffraction limit imaging [9-12]. The typical method for the assembly of plasmonic nanostructures is top-down lithography. Although it can fabricate plasmonic nanostructures with versatile shapes and novel behaviors, there still exists some problems such as the cost for mass production or making structures in multiple dimensions [13-14]. Bottom-up approaches, such as soft templates, offer new opportunities to fabricate plasmonic nanostructures [15-18].

DNA origami technology is a milestone during the history of DNA nanotechnology. It broke through the traditional rules that folded a long single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) by hundreds of staples to create thousands of nanostructures with custom designed shapes or precisely controlled motions in multiple dimensions [19-22]. DNA origami has been proved as templates for the assembly of plasmonic nanostructures [23-26].

Because the local fields are enhanced by the oscillations of conduction electrons around metal nanoparticles (NPs), these plasmonic nanostructures illustrate novel optical behavior such as surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), ultraviolet-visible spectrometry, circular dichroism and so on [27-32]. The high precise addressability of DNA origami makes them excellent tools to study the interaction between metal NPs. A typical example is a 40×45 nm2 DNA origami template to organize two 40 nm AuNPs into dimers with sub-5 nm gaps. The strong optical coupling between the AuNP dimers induced enhanced SERS signals during the measurements of an external analyte and ssDNA oligos attached to the NPs [33]. Also, dynamic DNA origami were employed to organize two gold nanorods (AuNRs). The movement of DNA origami regulated the CD performance of the AuNRs [34].

To study the more novel optical behavior of the plasmonic nanostructures, more functional templates and the precise and high-yield placement of NPs onto the template are of vital importance. Limited to the size of DNA origami which are approximate 100 nm, it is hard to assemble more intricate plasmonic nanostructures in large scale. Herein, we firstly employed rectangular DNA origami as the template for the programmed positioning of two 30 nm AuNPs. TEM images showed the high yields of AuNPs’ assembly on the rectangular DNA origami. Then, the connecting strands were used to link the DNA origami templates together, which generated chains of AuNPs. Furthermore, we observed a significant Raman signal enhancement from molecules covalently attached to the AuNP-dimers and AuNP-chains.

II. Experimental

A. Chemicals and Reagents

All DNA strands were purchased from Sangon (PAGE purification). Thiol-modified DNA was purchased from Takara (high-performance liquid chromatography purification). M13mp18 ss-DNA was purchased from New England Biolabs which was used as received. 30 nm gold nanoparticles were obtained by BBI. All of chemicals were supplied by Sigma.

B. Preparation of AuNPs-DNA conjugates

We added 1 µL 100 nM thiol-modified DNA to 100 µL 30 nm AuNP solution in a 0.5×TBE buffer (89 mM Tris, 89 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) then incubated the buffer for four hours at 37 °C. Then, we placed 10 µL of 3M NaCl into the reaction solution slowly for 4 times in 2 hours, and the final concentration of NaCl was reached at 300 mM. Then, the solution was kept at 37°C for 12 hours. We purified the DNA functionalized AuNPs by repeated centrifugation (7000 rpm, 10min). Each time, the supernatant was carefully removed and then the AuNPs were resuspended in a 0.5×TBE buffer to get rid of excess thiol-modified DNA. The concentration of AuNPs was characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy.

C. Assembly of Rectangle DNA origami

A rectangle DNA origami template was obtained in a one-pot construction, in which 2 nM of M13mp18 DNA was incubated with 10 nM of staple strands in a 1 × TAE/Mg2+ (40 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM Boric acid, 2 mM EDTA and 12.5 mM magnesium acetate, pH 8.0) buffer. The mixture was annealed from 95 °C to 20 °C with slowly decreasing the temperature at a rate of 1 °C min-1. Then, the prepared DNA origami was filtered by the 100 kDa (MWCO) centrifuge filters for four times to remove the extra strands.

D. Assembly of AuNPs onto a DNA origami template to form AuNP-chains

The rectangle origami template was mixed with the AuNPs at a molar ratio of 1:4. The mixture was performed by annealing from 45°C to 30°C four times at a rate of 0.6 °C min-1 and then cooling to 4 °C. Then, the 1µL 2µM DNA edge staples were added into the previous mixture overnight.

E. TEM Characterization

For TEM imaging, a 10 µL sample was dropped on a carbon-coated grid (400 mesh, Ted Pella). During deposition for 15 min, the excess solution drop was wicked from the grid by absorption into filter paper. To get rid of the deposited salt, a droplet of water and filter paper were used to remove the excess water away. The grid was kept in a bake oven at 37 °C. for 4 hours for drying. The TEM characterization was conducted using a Tecnei G2-20S TWIN system and operated at 200 kV with a bright field mode.

F. SERS Characterization

For SERS characterization, the samples were incubated on a 5 mM 4-Mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA, 99%) ethanolic solution for 2 h and dropped onto silicon. The SERS spectra were recorded by a confocal Raman microscope (In Via, Renishaw, England) equipped with a 633 nm He-Ne laser. Resolution grating of 1800 grooves and a slit of 100 μM were used on all measurements. The spectra ranged from 1000 to 1850 cm−1. For all measurements, the experimental parameters were as follows: excitation wavelength 633 nm, objective 20×, laser power 0.08 mW, and acquisition time 10 s.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Strategy for the assembly of 30 nm AuNPs into AuNP-chains

In principle, larger sized AuNPs may generate stronger plasmonic resonance. Compared to small-sized AuNPs, large-sized AuNPs should be assembled with more ssDNA on their surface which may lower the possibility for precipitation. Hence, more capture strands were needed to resist the charge repulsion between DNA-AuNPs and the templates. The rectangular DNA origami was designed by folding a long ssDNA scaffold with hundreds of staples. Four staples at the central part in each half of the DNA origami were designed with a capture part for the anchoring of two 30 nm AuNPs (Fig S1). The gaps between two AuNPs were set to 10 nm. To make the AuNPs into AuNP-chains, linker A and link B were prolonged to the staples at each side of the rectangular DNA origami, which could be linked together by hybridization with linker C (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.
(Color online) Schematic showing of the formation of AuNP-chains on the template of rectangular DNA origami.
pic
B. Assembly and Characterization of AuNP-dimers nanostructure based on rectangular DNA origami

The rectangular DNA origami was folded by M13 (virus ss-DNA) with hundreds of staples, carrying capture strands and linkers. AFM images (S1) demonstrated the formation of rectangular DNA origami. The schematic in Fig. 2 illustrated that AuNPs were anchored onto the rectangular DNA origami into dimers by the hybridization of capture strands on the template and ssDNA on AuNPs. The gaps between two AuNPs were set to 10 nm. Typical TEM images in Fig. 2 demonstrated the successful assembly of AuNP-dimers. The yield of AuNP-dimers was 80.6% according to the TEM images. The gaps seems to be 1-2 nm between AuNPs, which were much smaller than 10 nm. This phenomenon may be induced by the shrink during the sample preparation for TEM.

Fig. 2.
(Color online) Schematic illustration and TEM images of rectangular DNA origami based AuNPs-dimers. The scale bars are 100 nm.
pic
C. TEM characterization of the assembly of AuNP-chains

In order to obtain larger plasmonic nanostructures, linkers were employed to organize the rectangular DNA origami template into nanoribbons, which could be validated by the AFM images (Fig. S2). By the addition of the linkers, the AuNP-dimers were organized together into AuNP-chains. Typical TEM images showed that 30 nm AuNPs were linked into chains (Fig. 3 & Fig S3). In fact, there was another way to form AuNPs, which used DNA nanoribbon as the template. But this approach seemed much easier to make the AuNPs to participate. In the TEM images, similar phenomenon of shrink also happened. The gaps between AuNPs in AuNP-chains seems to be 1-2 nm wide according to the TEM images.

Fig. 3.
(Color online) Schematic illustration and TEM images of 30 nm AuNP-chains. The scale bars are 100 nm.
pic
D. AuNP-dimers and AuNP-chains for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy

The AuNP-dimers and AuNP-chains are typical plasmonic nanostructures which impelled us to consider their potential functionalities. Previous studies showed that proper distances between AuNPs in the plasmonic nanostructures would generate hotspots which may have induced signals of surface enhanced raman scattering (SERS). The distance between the capture strands is 10 nm. When 30 nm AuNPs were anchored, the AuNP were closed to each other with no gaps. According to the TEM images, the gaps were 1-2 nm because there existed the charge repulsion between DNA-AuNPs. AuNPs with these gaps may generate the coupling of plasmons in the AuNPs assemblies (Fig. S4). 4-Mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA) were employed as a Raman-active molecule. They can covalently attach to the AuNPs by the strong interaction of an Au-S bond. The typical SERS spectrum is shown in Fig. 4. The frequency of 1578 cm-1 and 1075 cm-1 in the SERS spectra were clearly attributed to 4-MBA. Using individual AuNPs samples (black curve) as a control, the AuNP-dimers (red curve) and AuNP-chains (blue curve) obtained significant enhanced signals under SERS detection. Taken the peak at 1075 cm−1 for example, the SERS signal intensity increased from 929.6 (AuNP-dimers) to 4963.9 au (AuNP-chains) (Fig. 5), the reason of which may own to the increasing of hot spots between AuNPs.

Fig. 4.
(Color online) Typical SERS spectra of 4-MBA attached to AuNP-dimers and AuNP-chains based on the rectangular DNA origami.
pic
Fig. 5.
The characteristic SERS intensity at 1075 cm-1of AuNPs, AuNP-dimers and AuNP-chains.
pic

IV. CONCLUSION

In summary, we have anchored large-sized AuNPs on to the rectangular DNA origami with high yields. By using the linkers to connect the DNA origami templates together, chains of AuNPs were obtained. Thus, prepared AuNP-dimers and AuNP-chains were validated by TEM images which demonstrated their organization and structural uniformity. Furthermore, significant enhanced signals of SERS detection were obtained for the samples of AuNP-dimers and AuNP-chains. This strategy is a simple and timesaving way to construct large-scale plasmonic nanostructures based on AuNPs, which may open up the prospects of high ordered plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical properties.

References
[1] F. Peng, Y. Su, Y. Zhong et al.,

Silicon nanomaterials platform for bioimaging, biosensing, and cancer therapy

. Accounts of chemical research, 2014, 47: 612-623. doi: 10.1021/ar400221g
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] J. Mcphillips, A. Murphy, M.P. Jonsson et al.,

High-performance biosensing using arrays of plasmonic nanotubes

. ACS nano, 2010, 4: 2210-2216. doi: 10.1021/nn9015828
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] J. Chao, D. Zhu, Y. Zhang et al.,

DNA nanotechnology-enabled biosensors

. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2016, 76: 68-79. doi: 10.1002/adma.201002767
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] J. Zhou, Y. Zuo, X. Wan et al.,

Solution-processed and high-performance organic solar cells using small molecules with a benzodithiophene unit

. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135: 8484-8487. doi: 10.1021/ja403318y
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] F. Wang, C. Li, H. Chen et al.,

Plasmonic harvesting of light energy for Suzuki coupling reactions

. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135: 5588-5601. doi: 10.1021/ja310501y
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] Ł. Bujak, T. Ishii, D.K. Sharma et al.,

Selective turn-on and modulation of resonant energy transfer in single plasmonic hybrid nanostructures

. Nanoscale, 2017, 9: doi: 10.1039/C6NR08740J
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] W. Shen, M.F. Bruist, S.D. Goodman et al.,

A Protein‐Driven DNA Device That Measures the Excess Binding Energy of Proteins That Distort DNA

. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004, 43: 4750-4752. doi: 10.1117/12.2051277
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] M. Lee, J.U. Kim, K.J. Lee et al.,

Aluminum nanoarrays for plasmon-enhanced light harvesting

. ACS nano, 2015, 9: 6206-6213. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01541
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] K. Dopf, S. Heunisch, P. Schwab et al., Superresolution optical fluctuation imaging (SOFI) aided nanomanipulation of quantum dots using AFM for novel artificial arrangements of chemically functionalized colloidal quantum dots and plasmonic structures[C]. SPIE Photonics Europe, 2014, 9: 91260N-912609N. doi: 10.1117/12.2051277
[10] Y. Xiong, Z. Liu, C. Sun et al.,

Two-dimensional imaging by far-field superlens at visible wavelengths

. Nano letters, 2007, 7: 3360-3365. doi: 10.1021/nl0716449
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] T. Tian, J.-C. Zhang, H.-Z. Lei et al.,

Synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence analysis of Fe, Zn and Cu in mice brain associated with Parkinson’s disease

. Nucl. Sci. Tech, 2015, 26: 030506. doi: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.26.030506
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] N. Fang, H. Lee, C. Sun et al.,

Sub-diffraction-limited optical imaging with a silver superlens

. Science, 2005, 308: 534-537. doi: 10.1126/science.1108759
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] S. Biswas, J. Duan, D. Nepal et al.,

Plasmonic resonances in self-assembled reduced symmetry gold nanorod structures

. Nano letters, 2013, 13: 2220-2225. doi: 10.1021/nl4007358
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] J.A. Fan, Y. He, K. Bao et al.,

DNA-enabled self-assembly of plasmonic nanoclusters

. Nano letters, 2011, 11: 4859-4864. doi: 10.1021/nl203194m
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] G. Dai, X. Lu, Z. Chen et al.,

DNA origami-directed, discrete three-dimensional plasmonic tetrahedron nanoarchitectures with tailored optical chirality

. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2014, 6: 5388-5392. doi: 10.1021/am501599f
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] C. Helgert, E. Pshenay-Severin, M. Falkner et al.,

Chiral metamaterial composed of three-dimensional plasmonic nanostructures

. Nano letters, 2011, 11: 4400-4404. doi: 10.1021/nl202565e
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] A. Dhawan, Y. Du, D. Batchelor et al.,

Hybrid Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Fabrication Approach for Wafer‐Scale Plasmonic Nanoplatforms

. Small, 2011, 7: 727-731. doi: 10.1002/smll.201002186
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] B. Wei, M. Dai, P. Yin

Complex shapes self-assembled from single-stranded DNA tiles

. Nature, 2012, 485: 623-626. doi: 10.1038/nature11075
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] P.W. Rothemund

Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns

. Nature, 2006, 440: 297-302. doi: 10.1038/nature04586
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] E.S. Andersen, M. Dong, M.M. Nielsen et al.,

Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid

. Nature, 2009, 459: 73-76. doi: 10.1038/nature07971
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] H. Dietz, S.M. Douglas, W.M. Shih

Folding DNA into twisted and curved nanoscale shapes

. Science, 2009, 325: 725-730. doi: 10.1126/science.1174251
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] H. Zhang, J. Chao, D. Pan et al.,

DNA origami-based shape IDs for single-molecule nanomechanical genotyping

. Nature Communications, 2017, 8:14738. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14738
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] A. Kuzyk, R. Schreiber, Z. Fan et al.,

DNA-based self-assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response

. Nature, 2012, 483: 311-314. doi: 10.1038/nature10889
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] H. Gu, J. Chao, S.-J. Xiao et al.,

A proximity-based programmable DNA nanoscale assembly line

. Nature, 2010, 465: 202-205. doi: 10.1038/nature09026
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] M.J. Urban, C. Zhou, X. Duan et al.,

Optically Resolving the Dynamic Walking of a Plasmonic Walker Couple

. Nano letters, 2015, 15: 8392-8396. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04270
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] X. Lan, Z. Chen, G. Dai et al.,

Bifacial DNA origami-directed discrete, three-dimensional, anisotropic plasmonic nanoarchitectures with tailored optical chirality

. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135: 11441-11444. doi: 10.1021/ja404354c
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[27] P. KüHler, E.-M. Roller, R. Schreiber et al.,

Plasmonic DNA-origami nanoantennas for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

. Nano letters, 2014, 14: 2914-2919. doi: 10.1021/nl5009635
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[28] V.V. Thacker, L.O. Herrmann, D.O. Sigle et al.,

DNA origami based assembly of gold nanoparticle dimers for surface-enhanced Raman scattering

. Nature communications, 2014, 5: 3448-3453. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4448
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[29] B. Liu, C. Song, D. Zhu et al.,

DNA‐Origami‐Based Assembly of Anisotropic Plasmonic Gold Nanostructures

. Small, 2017, 13: 1603991-1603999. doi: 10.1002/smll.201603991
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[30] X. Lan, X. Lu, C. Shen et al.,

Au nanorod helical superstructures with designed chirality

. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 137: 457-462. doi: 10.1021/ja511333q
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[31] C. Zhou, X. Duan, N. Liu

A plasmonic nanorod that walks on DNA origami

. Nature communications, 2015, 6: 9102. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9102
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[32] S. Pal, Z. Deng, H. Wang et al.,

DNA directed self-assembly of anisotropic plasmonic nanostructures

. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133: 17606-17609. doi: 10.1021/ja207898r
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[33] M. Pilo-Pais, A. Watson, S. Demers et al.,

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering plasmonic enhancement using DNA origami-based complex metallic nanostructures

. Nano letters, 2014, 14: 2099-2104. doi: 10.1021/nl5003069
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[34] Z. Chen, X. Lan, Y.-C. Chiu et al.,

Strong chiroptical activities in gold nanorod dimers assembled using DNA origami templates

. Acs Photonics, 2015, 2: 392-397. doi: 10.1021/ph500434f
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar