logo

Nonlinear energy chirp compensation with corrugated structures

SYNCHROTRON RADIATION TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS

Nonlinear energy chirp compensation with corrugated structures

Zhen Wang
Chao Feng
Da-Zhang Huang
Qiang Gu
Meng Zhang
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.29, No.12Article number 175Published in print 01 Dec 2018Available online 16 Nov 2018
39400

Herein, a feasible method is proposed to compensate the high-order effect during bunch length compression; thereby, enhancing the peak current of a high repetition rate X-ray free-electron laser source. In the proposed method, the corrugated structure is inserted downstream of the high-order harmonic cavities to function as a passive linearizer and enhance the longitudinal profile of the electron beam. Three-dimensional simulations are performed to analyze the evolution of the longitudinal phase space and the results demonstrate that the profile of the electron beam is improved and the peak current can be easily optimized to over 2 kA with a bunch charge of 100 pC.

Corrugated structureNonlinear energy chirpHigh repetition rate FEL

I. Introduction

Unlike conventional lasers or synchrotron radiations, a free-electron laser (FEL) can generate ultra-short, ultra-bright, and fully-coherent hard X-ray radiations, which is at the origin of FELs extensive development over the last decade [1, 2]. Nowadays, many X-ray FEL facilities exist or are under-construction around the world, such as LCLS in the USA [3], SACLA in Japan [4], FERMI in Italy [5, 6], Pal-FEL in Korea [7], SXFEL in China [8-12], and Swiss-FEL in Switzerland [13]. As these facilities are driven by the common conducting (copper) linear accelerator (linac), their repetition rates are in the range of 1-120 Hz, leading to a relatively low average power.

Alternatively, high repetition rate FEL facilities based on superconducting (SC) techniques have been studied for years. For example, FLASH in Germany [14], a soft X-ray user facility based on macro-bunch modes, has accumulated extensive experience on SC techniques. Recently, the European XFEL [15] successfully generated hard X-ray FEL, which is a milestone in the FEL community. LCLS II based in the USA and SHINE in China [16], which have been recently launched, are hard X-ray FEL facilities based on SC linac with continuous wave (CW) modes. These high repetition rates (about 1 MHz) FEL facilities could provide up to a thousand-fold increase in average brightness compared with the common conducting FEL facilities.

In order to provide the CW electron beam train, the common conducting very high frequency (VHF) gun [17-19], the high-voltage direct current (DC) gun [20], or the SC RF gun [21] are developed as the injector of the CW FEL facilities. As the beam energy from these guns is relatively low compared with that of the usual conducting copper photocathode gun, the high-order terms of the electron longitudinal phase space play an important role in the forthcoming electron beam compression process, suffering from strong space charge effects. The peak current of the electron beam at the exit of the SC linac is limited to approximately 1 kA, which is much lower than that of the common conducting linac. This usually leads to a degradation of the FEL performance, more particularly for FEL lasing in hard X-ray regime.

Herein, the use of corrugated structures is proposed to compensate for the high-order terms during the compression process, as these structures are usually employed as a beam energy dechirper [22-25]. These corrugated structures are inserted upstream of the first bunch compressor chicane, providing a passive wakefield to modulate the longitudinal phase space of the electron beam. Three-dimensional start-to-end simulations are performed to study the evolution of the longitudinal phase space and the results with and without the corrugated pipe are compared. The results demonstrated that the longitudinal phase space is improved and the peak current of the electron beam at the exit of the SC linac can be enhanced to over 2 kA.

The principle of the compression process and the basic analytic properties of the corrugated pipe are introduced in section 2 of this manuscript. The start-to-end simulation studies are performed with an optimized corrugated pipe for SHINE in section 3. Finally, a summary and conclusions are briefly stated in section 4.

II. Theory

In the case of the usual conducting hard X-ray FEL facilities, the nonlinear effects, such as the sinusoidal RF time-curvature and the second-order momentum compaction terms during the compression process, dominate the final peak current of the electron beam. A harmonic cavity, usually an X-band, is used to linearize the bunch compression process and compensate for the second-order compression effects [20]. Similarly, a third harmonic cavity is used as the linearizer upstream of the first bunch compressor chicane (BC1) in the SC linac-based high repetition rate FEL facilities. The schematic layout of the gun, the linac segments, and the first chicane are presented in Fig. 1, with the symbols defined as the voltage (V), the RF phase (φ), the wavelength (λ) of each cryomodule in the injector (L0 CM) and the linac (L1 CM), and the chicane momentum compaction coefficients (R56, T566).

Figure 1.
(Color online) Schematic layout of the gun, the linac segments and the first chicane, The voltages and the phases in L0 CM are defined as the equivalent values V0 andφ0 for simplicity.
pic

Based on the analysis for a high-harmonic cavity [26], the necessary harmonic voltage as can be calculated as follows:

eV3cosϕ3=E0[1λ122π2T566R563(1σzσz0)2]Ei1(λ1λ3)2, (1)

Where E and σ are the energy and the duration of the electron beam at different locations of the beamline, respectively.

However, suffering from the strong space charge effect in the injector, the compression process is dominated by the higher-order terms of the energy chirp. The typical longitudinal phase space of the electron beam at the end of the SC linac is presented in Fig. 2. It can be seen that the bunch-length-scale energy modulation leads to a double-horn density distribution and the current in the high-quality central part of the electron beam is approximately 1 kA.

Figure 2
(Color online) Longitudinal phase space of the electron beam at the exit of the linac. The bunch head is represented on the left. s is the coordinate along the beam.
pic

In order to improve the peak current of the electron beam, thus the FEL performance, the high-order terms must be compensated during the compression process. The corrugated structure, having a near-maximal possible amplitude for a given aperture, is an attractive solution to compensate for the high-order terms of the energy chirp as the 'additional linearizer' [27]. The geometry of the corrugated structure is presented in Fig.3. A relativistic electron beam passing on-axis through a periodic corrugated cylindrical pipe with the radius of a is considered. The corrugated gap is represented as g, the period as p and the depth as δ, with δ,pa. At the same time, a "steeply corrugated" structure is assumed, requiring δp.

Figure 3
(Color online) The geometry of the corrugated structure.
pic

When the relativistic charged beam passes through the structure, the longitudinal point charge wake is approximately expressed as [22-25, 27]:

W(s)=2χH(s)cosks, (2)

where χ is the mode loss factor.

χ=Z0c2πa2, (3)

where Z0=377Ω represents the characteristic impedance of vacuum and c is the speed of light. H(s) is the unit step function defined as:

H(s)={1,s00,s<0 (4)

and the wave number, k, is approximated defined as:

k=2paδg (5)

For a bunch with longitudinal distribution λ(s), the bunch wake is defined by the convolution:

Wλ(s)=0+W(s')λ(ss')ds' (6)

considering a Gaussian bunch density distribution beam with a bunch length of σz without any current fluctuation. By changing the geometry parameters of the corrugated structure, as presented in Fig. 3, thus optimizing the wavelength of the induced energy modulation, the high-order energy chirp of the electron beam can be compensated and the peak current can be improved. It should be noted that, to optimize the parameters of the corrugated structure, the wavelength of the main high-order terms of the bunch energy chirp should be analyzed. Therefore, the proper wavelength of the bunch wake (equal to the wavelength of the high-order terms) can be determined with Eq. (6). For the electron beam in SHINE, the wavelength of the point charge wake is approximately equal to the bunch length. The induced wakefield within the beam is represented in Fig. 4, where the quasi-periodic energy modulation along the beam introduced by the wakefield can be observed.

Figure 4.
The Gaussian bunch and the longitudinal wake along the bunch.
pic

III. Nonlinear effect compensation for the SHINE project

The SHINE will be the first hard X-ray FEL user facility based on the SC technique in China. The injector consists of a normal conducting electron RF gun (the VHF gun), a 1.3 GHz buncher, an eight 9-cell 1.3 GHz TESLA-like cryomodule (CM) [28], and a laser heater, providing an initial electron beam having a length of approximately 10 ps in full width at half maximum (FWHM), charge of 100 pC, peak current of about 10 A, and bunch rate up to 1 MHz. The main linac consists of three sections: L1 (two CMs with a beam energy of approximately 250 MeV), L2 (18 CMs, 2.1 GeV), and L3 (54 CMs, over 8 GeV), two bunch compressor chicanes BC1 (compressing the beam current from 10 A to 80 A) and BC2 (80 A to 1 kA), and a dechirper line at the end of the linac to compensate the correlated energy spread. Moreover, a 3.9 GHz third harmonic structure is located in L1 acting as a linearizer (harmonic linearizer, HL) to provide extra energy chirp and compensate for the second-order compression effects. The electron beam, after being generated in the injector and accelerated in the linac, with a bunch length of 8 μm in FWHM and a peak current of 1 kA, is finally sent to the downstream switchyard and the undulator systems for X-ray FEL generations. The layout of the injector and the linac of the SHINE are presented in Fig. 5. The main beam parameters of the SHINE are listed in Table 1.

Table I.
The main beam parameters of the SHINE.
Parameters Values
Energy (GeV) 8
Slice energy spread (rms) ≤0.01%
Normalized slice emittance (mm mrad) ≤0.4
Charge (pC) 100
Repetition rate (MHz) ≤1
Peak current (kA) 1
Bunch length (rms) (μm) 8
Transverse beam size (rms) (μm) 30
Show more
Figure 5
(Color online) Layout of the injector and the linac of SHINE.
pic

In order to illustrate the beam dynamic of the bunch, three-dimensional simulations are performed with all beamline components. The injector simulations are accomplished using the computer tracking codes ASTRA [29] considering the space charge effects. The main linac simulations are performed using ELEGANT [30], in which the coherent synchrotron radiation and the wakefield effects are considered. The longitudinal phase space evolution of the electron beam along the beamline are presented in Fig. 6. The peak current of the high-quality part of the electron beam is only of approximately 1 kA, and the double-horn-like current distribution limits the higher peak current due to the high-order terms of beam energy chirp.

Figure 6
(Colorl online) Longitudinal phase space evolution along the beamline at the exit of (top left) the injector, (top right) the BC1, (bottom left) the BC2, and (bottom right) the linac.
pic

On the other hand, the bunch length is relatively long in the gun (approximately 30 ps) and the injector (approximately 10 ps after the buncher). This comparable to the wavelength of the wakefield excited by the beam itself. As described above, the field along the bunch is no longer linear (as observed in Figure 4). By optimizing the parameters of the corrugated structure, the wavelength and the energy distribution of the structure-induced wakefield based on the given density distribution of the electron beam can be adjusted, and this can be used to compensate for the high-order energy chirp. In order to operate these adjustments, simulations (with LiTrack for 2D and ELEGANT for 3D) are performed to analyze the longitudinal phase space evolution of the electron beam based on the SHINE linac layout and are presented in Fig. 6. By plotting the central energy distribution of the electron beam at the exit of BC2 after removal of the linear correlation of energy chirp, the modulation period and amplitude can be calculated. Multiplied by the compression ratio, the modulation period before bunch compressor can be deducted. In order to compensate for the modulation, the gap and the length of corrugated structure can be scanned to adjust the modulation wavelength and amplitude based on the given Gaussian-like current distribution electron beam in the injector. Herein, the compression ratio is approximately 100 and the modulation period is approximately 3 mm. A 0.4 m-long corrugated pipe following the parameters in Table 2 is inserted downstream of the 3.9 GHz third harmonic cavities in the L1 section in order to compensate for the high-order terms of energy chirp. The longitudinal phase space evolution of the electron beam along the linac is shown in Fig. 7. The double-horn density distribution disappears, and the final current distribution is Gaussian-like with a peak current of approximately 1 kA. Compared with Figure 6, a distinct improvement of the linearity mainly can be observed in BC2 due to the high-order terms of energy chirp playing a more important role when the compression ratio is higher.

Table II.
Main parameters of the corrugated structure.
Parameters Values
Radius, a (mm) 2.5
Period, p (mm) 1.0
Depth, δ (mm) 0.4
Width, g (mm) 0.2
Length, L (m) 0.4
Show more
Figure 7
(Color online) Longitudinal phase space of the electron beam at the exit of (top left) the corrugated pipe, (top right) the BC1, (bottom left) the BC2, and (bottom right) the linac with the corrugated pipe as the additional linearizer.
pic

Furthermore, the accelerating phases and the compaction coefficients (R56 and T566) of BC1 and BC2 can be optimized to compress the beam to higher peak current, and this is even more critical for FEL operations in a hard X-ray regime. The longitudinal phase space, beam current, and slice energy spread distribution at the exit of the linac are summarized in Figure 8. The beam current can be easily enhanced to over 2 kA in an approximately 50 fs-wide region. The beam quality has been maintained in this region, where the slice energy spread is approximately 800 keV and the normalized slice emittance is approximately 0.25 mm mrad.

Figure 8
(Color online) (left) Longitudinal phase space of the electron beam, (right) slice energy spread, and normalized slice emittance distribution along the beam.
pic

IV. Conclusion

Due to nonlinear space charge effects, the peak current of the electron beam is limited to approximately 1 kA in high repetition rate free electron laser light source. In order to improve the peak current, the corrugated structure was proposed to be employed as an 'additional linearizer' downstream of the third harmonic cavity to compensate for the high-order terms of energy chirp during the compression process. The optimal parameters of the corrugated structures were determined and the simulation results demonstrated that this novel scheme is feasible. The double-horn current distribution was suppressed and the current distribution profile was optimized based on the SHINE beam. In addition, the beam was compressed further to higher peak current, e.g. over 2 kA according to our simulations, which will significantly improve the performance of a SC-linac-based FEL.

Reference
[1] J. M. J. Madey,

Stimulated Emission of Bremsstrahlung in a Periodic Magnetic Field

, Journal of Applied Physics 42 (1971) 1906. doi: 10.1063/1.1660466
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] C. Feng, H.X. Deng

Review of fully coherent free-electron laser

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 29, 160 (2018). doi: 10.1007/s41365-018-0490-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur et al.,

First lasing and operation of an ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser

. Nat. Photonics 4, 641 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.176
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] H. Tanaka, H. Aoyagi, T. Asaka et al.,

A compact X-ray free-electron laser emitting in the sub-ångstrom region

. Nat. Photonics 6, 540 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.141
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] E. Allaria, R. Appio, L. Badano et al.,

Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free-electron laser in the extreme ultraviolet

. Nat. Photonics 6, 699 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.233
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] E. Allaria, D. Castronovo, P. Cinquegrana et al.,

Two-stage seeded soft-X-ray free-electron laser

. Nat. Photonics 7, 913 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.277
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] H. Kang, C. Min, H. Heo et al.,

Hard X-ray free-electron laser with femtosecond-scale timing jitter

. Nat. Photonics 11, 708 (2017). doi: 10.1038/s41566-017-0029-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] Z. T. Zhao,

Shanghai soft x-ray free electron laser test facility

, in Proceedings of IPAC2011, San Sebastián, Spain, THPC053
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] Z. Wang, C. Feng, Q. Gu et al.,

Generation of double pulses at the Shanghai soft X-ray free electron laser facility

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. (2017) 28: 28. doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0188-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] M. Song, C. Feng, D. Huang et al.,

Wakefields studies for the SXFEL user facility

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. (2017) 28: 90. doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0242-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] Q. Yu, D. Gu, M. Zhang et al.,

Transverse phase space reconstruction study in Shanghai soft X-ray FEL facility

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. (2018) 29: 9. doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0338-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] Y. Bian, W. Zhang, B. Liu et al.,

Sub-picosecond electron bunch length measurement using coherent transition radiation at SXFEL

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. (2018) 29: 74. doi: 10.1007/s41365-018-0399-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] B. D. Patterson, R. Abela, H. Braun et al.,

Coherent science at the SwissFEL x-ray laser

, New J. Phys. 12, 035012 (2010). doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/3/035012
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] W. A. Ackermann, G. Asova, V. Ayvazyan et al.,

Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the water window

, Nat. Photonics 1, 336 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.76
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] M. Altarelli, R. Brinkmann, M. Chergui et al.,

XFEL: The European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser - Technical Design Report

(DESY, Ham-burg, 2006) pp. 1-646.
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] Z. T. Zhao, C. Feng and K. Zhang,

Two-stage EEHG for coherent hard X-ray generation based on a superconducting linac

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. (2017) 28: 117. doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0258-z
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] A. Opanasenko, V. Mytrochenko, V. Zhaunerchyk et al.,

Design study of a low-emittance high-repetition rate thermionic rf gun

. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 053401 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.053401
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] Z. Ding, S. Karkare, J. Feng et al.,

Temperature-dependent quantum efficiency degradation of K-Cs-Sb bialkali antimonide photocathodes grown by a triple-element code position method

, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 113401 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.113401
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] R. Huang, D. Filippetto, C. Papadopoulos et al.,

Dark current studies on a normal-conducting high-brightness very-high-frequency electron gun operating in continuous wave mode

, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 18, 013401 (2015). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.18.013401
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] C. Gulliford, A. Bartnik, I. Bazarov et al.,

Demonstration of low emittance in the Cornell energy recovery linac injector prototype

. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 16, 073401 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.073401
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] T. Rao, I. Ben-zvi, A. Burrill et al.,

Design, construction and performance of all niobium superconducting radio frequency electron gun

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 562 (2006) 22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.02.172
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] K. L. F. Bane and G. Stupakov,

Impedance of a rectangular beam tube with small corrugations

. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 024401 (2003). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.6.024401
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] K. L. F. Bane and G. Stupakov,

Corrugated pipe as a beam dechirper

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 690 (2012) 106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.07.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] K. L. F. Bane and G. Stupakov,

Dechirper wakefields for short bunches

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 820 (2016) 156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.02.055
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] K. Bane, G. Stupakov and I. Zagorodnov,

Analytical formulas for short bunch wakes in a flat dechirper

. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19, 084401 (2016). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.084401
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] P. Emma, X-Band RF Harmonic Compensation for Linear Bunch Compression in the LCLS, SLAC-TN-05-004, LCLS-TN-01-1, November 14,2001
[27] Q. Gu, M. Zhang and M. H. Zhao,

A passive linearizer for bunch compression

, in Proceedings of LINAC2012, Tel-Aviv, Israel TUPB022
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[28] B. Aune, R. Bandelmann, D. Bloess et al.,

Superconducting TESLA cavities

, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 3, 092001 (2000). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.3.092001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[29] K. Floettmann,

ASTRA User’s Manual

, available at http://www.desy.de/mpyflo/Astra_dokumentationS
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[30] M. Borland,

Elegant: A flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulation. Advanced Photon Source Report No. LS-287

, 2000
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar