logo

The 18F-FDG uptake in non small cell lung carcinoma correlates with the DNA-grading of malignancy

The 18F-FDG uptake in non small cell lung carcinoma correlates with the DNA-grading of malignancy

WU Jin-Chang
BAUM R P
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.13, No.3pp.187-192Published in print 01 Aug 2002
20100

In order to evaluate correlation of glucose metabolism and DNA ploidity of tumors, the uptake of 18F-Deoxyglucose (FDG) by PET prior to surgery and the DNA cotent and DNA-grading of malignancy (DNA-MG) of Schiff-stained nuclei obtained from fresh tumor fragments by means of image cytometry were studied, and thereafter the correlation between standardized uptake value (SUV) and (DNA-MG) was analysed in forty-nine patients with histologically proven non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). As a result of the DNA histograms of these 49 patients, 46 (93.88%) were aneuploid and only 3(6.12%) were tetraploid. A linear correlation of the SUV versus the (DNA-MG) (r=0.336, p=0.024) was found, demonstrating that 18F-FDG PET as a non-invasive metabolic imaging technique, may also provide information correlated to malignant DNA patterns which may be valuable in malignant differentiation and prognostic prediction.

Non small cell lung carcinoma18F-FDGPositron emission tomographyDNA-image cytometryDNA-grading
References
1 Goppinger A, Freudenberg N, Hillemans H G. Anal quant cytol histol, 1986, 8(2): 148-151
2 Auffermann W. Anal quant cytol histol, 1985, 7(3): 218-226
3 Bocking A, Auffermann W, Jocham D et al. Appl Pathol, 1985, 3: 206-214
4 Schifter T, Hoffman J M, Hanson M W et al. J Comput Assist Tomogra, 1993. 17: 509-516
5 Ruhlmann J, Oehr P, Biersack H J ed. PET in oncology, basics and clinical applications. Heidelberg: Springer, 1999
6 Baslev I, Christensen I J, Rasmussen B B et al. Int J Cancer, 1996, 56: 16-25
7 Visakorpi T, Holli K, Hakama M. Acta Oncol, 1995, 34: 605-609
8 Filderman A E, Silvestri G A, Gatsonis C et al. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1992, 145: 707-710
9 Watanabe A, Tanaka R, Takeda N et al. J Neurosurg, 1989, 70: 86-91
10 Barsh G S, Cunningham D D. J Supramol Struct, 1997, 7: 61-77
11 Weber M J, Evans P K, Johnson M A et al. Fed Proc Fed Am Soc Exp Biol, 1984, 43: 107-112