logo

Developing time-of-flight polarized neutron capability at the China Spallation Neutron Source

NUCLEAR ELECTRONICS AND INSTRUMENTATION

Developing time-of-flight polarized neutron capability at the China Spallation Neutron Source

Long Tian
Ahmed Salman
Chu-Yi Huang
Yu-Chen Dong
Fan Ye
Ze-Cong Qin
Wolfgang Kreuzpaintner
Jun-Pei Zhang
Tian-Hao Wang
Xin Tong
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.34, No.10Article number 146Published in print Oct 2023Available online 06 Oct 2023
42704

Polarized neutrons play an indispensable role in neutron scattering research, and have been incorporated into various neutron diffractometers and spectrometers. Recognizing the importance of polarized neutrons, the China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) has dedicated resources for developing its own capabilities for polarized neutron techniques. Hence, a polarized neutron development platform was allocated to the BL-20 beam port at CSNS for the purpose of facilitating new technological developments and calibration of instruments. Here, we report the progress we have made in terms of using the established development platform at BL-20, including the characterization of neutron spin filter cells manufactured at CSNS, the calibration of self-developed polarized neutron instruments, performance of the polarized neutron technique applied to beamlines, and associated simulation work for beamline magnetic field environments. These results demonstrate the capability of the CSNS to develop time-of-flight polarized neutron instruments and techniques in-house, which will be incorporated into the construction of CSNS neutron beamlines.

Polarized neutronPolarization analysisNeutron instrumentation
1

Introduction

By taking advantage of the fact that neutrons are uncharged, yet possess magnetic moments, the polarized neutron technique has been widely applied to various types of neutron beamlines in major neutron sources worldwide. Applications of polarized neutrons stand out in research involving magnetic structures and excitations, and are therefore prevalent in most neutron scattering experiments [1-4]. By utilizing polarized neutron techniques in diffraction research, contributions from nuclear, magnetic, and incoherent scattering can be identified, allowing the information about the magnetic structure obscured by other signals to be explicitly separated, as demonstrated by applications at the Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) D7 and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) HB-1 [5-7]. In neutron spectroscopy experiments, neutron polarization analysis methods are used to distinguish magnons from phonons to study spin wave mechanisms. Typical applications of the polarized neutron spectrometry are performed at the ILL THALES and IN22 beamlines [8, 9]. For mesoscale and large-scale structural studies, the polarized neutron technique is commonly applied to neutron reflectometry and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) beamlines, such as the beamlines of the Heinz-Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ) KWS-1 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) NG-1 [10, 11].

The China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS), designed as a large-scale multidisciplinary neutron source, currently operates with 100 kW proton beam power, generating a stable neutron beam with a high flux of neutrons. The CSNS provides a powerful and comprehensive research platform for many frontier disciplines involving the study of the structures and dynamics of various material systems [12-14]. Great demand exists for the capability to supply polarized neutrons to meet different research requirements at CSNS, including studies of nanomagnetic materials on its Very Small-Angle Neutron Scattering spectrometer [15, 16], as well as magnetic dynamics studies of materials on the Direct-Geometry Polarized Neutron Inelastic Scattering spectrometer [17, 18]. In this case, in-house research and development (R & D) work on the polarized neutron technique is urgently needed for CSNS because commercially available polarized neutron components are often inadequate for customization, particularly for complex neutron beamline applications.

R & D in scientific instrumentation is crucial for maintaining the long-term performance and capabilities of a neutron beamline. Therefore, dedicated test beamlines are commissioned at neutron facilities, such as the NOBORU beamline at J-PARC in Japan [19], the TBL beamline at the European Spallation Source (ESS) in Sweden [20], and the HB-2D and CG-4B beamlines at HFIR in the United States. These beamlines support studies such as detector trials, polarized neutron imaging tests, examinations of instruments developed in-house, and verification of new techniques. The development of key instruments on test beamlines, including the calibration of 3 He spin-filtering cells, detector tests, and examination of the chopper design [20-22], indicates the importance of development tests in the smooth commissioning of such instruments or techniques. In addition, these beamlines have contributed to advanced neutron research [23, 24].

The primary R & D goal for polarized neutrons at CSNS is to generate and manipulate polarized neutrons in a self-sufficient way. Significant progress has been made in this area, including the in-house development of 3He neutron spin filter (NSF) systems, neutron spin flippers, and customized guide field systems. As a newly commissioned neutron source, CSNS also takes advantage of the opportunity to open up novel neutron experimental methods and further promote research on neutron methodology. To satisfy the in-house requirements for polarized neutron development, as well as to explore new techniques, time-of-flight polarized neutron development at CSNS aims to achieve quantitative analysis of neutron polarization across a wide range of wavelengths. Such work will be conducted under various beamline configurations along with customized simulations of the magnetic field environment and neutron polarization, which are expected to improve our understanding of the performance of polarized neutron setups.

In this paper, we report the performance of the polarized neutron technique under different combinations of customized polarized neutron instruments at the neutron technology development beamline (BL-20) at CSNS, as well as the capability of simulating the magnetic field environment and neutron polarization of the beamline, indicating that CSNS have the ability to generate and manipulate polarized neutron beams with high neutron polarization and transmission over a wide range of neutron wavelengths and can meet the needs of various neutron experiments.

2

Setup of the polarized neutron experiment platform at CSNS

Test experiments using polarized neutrons were conducted at BL-20. BL-20 uses a decoupled hydrogen moderator to slow down spallation neutrons at first, followed by a T0 chopper to filter out the high-energy flash at time 0, which is 11.4 meters away from the neutron beam port. By adjusting the phase of the T1 chopper mounted behind T0 with respect to the proton pulse, a bandwidth of 4.5 Å for a pulsed neutron beam was selected. In polarized neutron tests, typical wavelengths of 1–5.5 Å are selected to incorporate the pulse peak intensity while avoiding short-wavelength neutrons (λ<1 Å) that are naturally difficult to polarize. The spectrum within this bandwidth is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
Prime beam profile provided at BL-20. The downward peaks in the profile curve represent the Bragg edges of aluminum.
pic

During the polarized neutron experiments at BL-20, four optical platforms were installed and coaligned using lasers in the beamline space. The neutron intensity spectrum was measured by using a time-of-flight 3He gas detector mounted at the end of the fourth platform. Another counter was mounted in front of the platform, near the beam port, as a beam monitor. Both the detector and monitor have their zero-time signals synchronized with the proton pulse to enable us to convert the neutron time of flight to its wavelength based on the following equation: λ=2πk=2πtmL, (1) where m is the neutron mass, L is the distance between the moderator and detector, t is the time required for a neutron to travel between them, is the reduced Planck’s constant. The wavelength was calibrated against the Bragg edges of aluminum, as indicated by the red arrows in Fig. 1. Initially, square neutron beams with a 12-mm length were produced. The beams were collimated using B4C neutron slits of different sizes mounted along the neutron flight path.

The polarized neutron development platform at BL-20 was built by installing an arrangement of neutron spin polarizers, guide fields, spin manipulation devices, and final neutron spin analyzers before the detector. This platform was used to conduct polarized neutron experiments and perform quantitative neutron polarization analyses. Among the neutron spin polarizer and analyzer, at least one component is a polarized 3He spin filter device. A schematic layout of the experimental platform and corresponding photographic image of the equipment are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
(Color online) (a) Photograph of the polarized neutron setup including the ex-situ and in-situ 3He NSF systems applied to BL-20. (b) Schematic diagram of the polarized neutron testing experiment corresponding to (a). The blue and red arrows represent the different neutron spin polarizations, respectively, and the colored arrows at the bottom represent the magnetic field direction at corresponding regions.
pic

Benefiting from this development platform, multiple measurements for characterizing our customized neutron spin filter (NSF) cells, such as the cell pressure and lifetime of the 3 He polarization, can be performed efficiently and accurately. In addition, our spin-exchange optical pumping (SEOP)-based 3 He NSF systems were tested at BL-20 for stability and performance. Equipped with NSF cells with different characteristics, the 3 He NSF systems were verified for their capacity to generate high neutron polarization over a wide range of neutron wavelengths, operate continuously and stably for a prolonged period, and implement spin flipping with lower 3 He polarization losses [25-27]. Furthermore, neutron transmission measurements performed on this platform were used to test and characterize commercial instruments such as a polarizing supermirror with a V-cavity. In combination with our in-house developed π -angle-reversal neutron spin flipper, which is a nonadiabatic fast passage spin flipper with ideal flipping efficiency, the calibrated supermirror can also yield polarized neutron beams with high polarization and can be utilized as polarizers or analyzers in future experiments.

In the following sections, we present our current achievements by applying the above neutron-polarizing instruments to the BL-20 development platform.

3

Neutron polarization testing result

Figure 2(a) shows the beamline configuration at BL-20, obtained by combining the ex-situ and in-situ 3 He NSF systems for polarizing and analyzing incident neutron beams. This setup is more suitable for beamlines that have already been constructed, as they usually have a compact structure, or for experiments that require higher neutron polarization homogeneity over a wide wavelength range and mainly focus on studies within a lower wavelength range. Owing to the flexibility of the ex-situ 3He system, it is possible to easily assemble or disassemble instruments at the beamline or to switch NSF cells of different characteristics to satisfy the experimental requirements for varying neutron wavelengths. Using four B4 C slits in the instrument layout shown in Fig. 2(b), a collimated neutron beam with a diameter of 10 mm was generated. A horizontal guide field of approximately 10 Gauss was generated using three self-designed solenoid coils mounted behind the ex-situ system, ensuring that the neutron spin was not affected by precession [29]. Following its passage through the ex-situ spin filter, as indicated by the red arrows in Fig. 2(b), the horizontally polarized neutron beam was analyzed by the in-situ system in accordance with the 3He polarizing direction within the NSF cell. During the measurements at BL-20, two different sets of neutron transmission data were collected by flipping the 3He polarization through the adiabatic fast passage (AFP) installed on the ex-situ 3He NSF system, which was verified to be highly efficient, with a loss of approximately 0.5% of 3He polarization per AFP operation. The neutron transmittances are labeled as T++ and T-+, where + and – represent the 3He polarization of 3He NSF systems parallel or antiparallel to their holding-field directions. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the maximum value of T++, which corresponds to the high neutron flux spin state, exceeded 40%. The neutron polarization Pn is given by [30]: Pn=T++T+T+++T+. (2) The 3He NSF systems are equipped with the in-house produced NSF cells named Salty and Trident, the parameters of which are listed in Table 1. With this combination of 3He NSF instruments, over 90% of the neutron polarization above 3.1 Å and over 94% above 4 Å can be obtained (Fig 3(a)). A comparison of the neutron polarization curves measured at different times revealed that the decay of 3He polarization over time in the ex-situ system resulted in a reduction in neutron polarization by less than 1% at 4 Å after 14.5 hours of measurement, demonstrating that the 3He NSF setup can be used as a reliable method to produce polarized neutron beams with reasonable polarization over a prolonged period.

Table 1
Parameters of the customized cylindrical 3He NSF cells, including the cell inner length l and inner diameter ϕ, 3He pressure p at 25 ℃, maximum lifetime T1 and maximum saturated 3He polarization P3He.
Cell name l × ϕ (cm) p (bar) T1 (h) P3He (%)
Trident 7.9 × 7.2 1.58 ± 0.01 202.9 ± 1.6 74.4 ± 0.1
Salty 8.6 × 7.1 1.62 ± 0.04 239.9 ± 13.8 77.7 ± 1.9
Show more
Fig. 3
(Color online) (a) Neutron polarization and transmission measured with the setup shown in Fig. 2. The neutron polarization is plotted as a function of the neutron wavelength measured at different time, the transmission curves represent the high-flux spin state T++ and the low-flux spin state T-+ corresponding to the measurements performed at the very beginning. (b) Neutron transmission data of one of the newly produced cells collected by using the ex-situ system individually. The transmission curves of the unpolarized cell and the transmission ratio of the polarized to the unpolarized cell are plotted in black and blue, respectively, where the cell pressure and 3He polarization can be derived from the fittings based on the equations labeled in the figure [27, 28]. T0, T n, and T e are the neutron transmittance through depolarized, fully polarized, and empty 3He NSF cells, respectively, l is the cell inner length, n is the number density of the 3He, λ is the neutron wavelength, σ = σ0 λ with σ0 being the 3He absorption cross section for λ = 1 Å, p is the cell pressure, and P3He is the 3He polarization. The fitted values of the pressure and 3He polarization are 2.046 bar and 52.3%, respectively.
pic

Additionally, the ex-situ system is considered a good choice for characterizing newly produced NSF cells at BL-20. This system was used to individually test the two NSF cells on the beamline to perform neutron transmission measurements on the unpolarized and polarized new cells loaded inside its solenoid, as shown in Fig. 3(b). The properties of one of the new cells made of GE180 glass were determined to be the following: pressure of 2.046 ± 0.002 bar and 3He polarization of 52.3% ± 0.1%, which is close to the 49.2% ± 0.1% 3He polarization determined by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurement. These results provide us with a reliable reference value to calibrate the results collected by offline nuclear magnetic resonance measurements.

Considering the Figure of Merit of a neutron polarization instrument, which is widely used as Q = P2T and is dependent on the neutron wavelength and beam angular width (α), the 3He NSF has its natural advantages in the research area requiring smaller γ and larger α compared to polarizing supermirrors. This makes it more favorable for high-energy neutron scattering measurements with larger beam sizes, such as off-specular neutron reflection measurements [31, 32]. In general, the performance of a polarizing supermirror is considered superior at longer wavelengths, since a much higher 3He polarization is required for the 3He NSF to counteract the rapid decrease in neutron transmittance and achieve a Q value comparable to that of a supermirror. Above the critical wavelength value, polarizing supermirrors have a large and constant neutron transmittance and polarization, and they perform independently of external influences.

At BL-20, to integrate the advantages of the 3He NSF and supermirror, extend the available wavelength range, and improve the Q of the entire beamline, we replaced the 3He NSF system with a combination of a polarizing supermirror and a neutron spin flipper as the incident beam polarizer and spin flipper, respectively. The polarizing supermirror installed behind the monitor, which consists of Si wafers coated on both sides with m=4 Fe/Si thin films, where m is a measure of critical angle in units of critical angle of nickel, was fabricated by SwissNeutronics and commissioned as a transmission geometry unit [33] (Fig. 4). The supermirror was assembled in a V-shape with a taper angle of 1.19° and mounted inside a magnetic casing with its field vertically aligned, which generated a critical wavelength of 2 Å. Behind the supermirror, an in-house developed neutron spin flipper was employed to manipulate the neutron polarization, and was verified to have polarization flipping efficiency of more than 90% and over 95% neutron transmittance at wavelengths longer than 1.1 Å [34].

Fig. 4
(Color online) Schematic diagram of the polarized neutron test experiment setup consisting of a supermirror, neutron spin flipper, in-situ 3 He NSF system, the designed guide field system, and the neutron beam monitor and detector. The blue and black arrows represent the magnetic field and neutron evolution of the polarization along the central neutron trajectory, respectively.
pic

The main field directions between the supermirror polarizer and in-situ 3He NSF analyzer were different, and a customized guide field system was required to realize the adiabatic transition of neutron polarization. Using the three-dimensional finite element method of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software [35], we simulated the magnetic field distribution along the overall beamline using calibrated models of the polarized neutron components. This led to the design of a suitable guide-field system. As shown in Fig. 5(a), the field direction is initially along the vertical direction and then becomes horizontally aligned between the permanent magnet and coil components. To satisfy the condition of adiabatic transition of the neutron polarization, the field strength and positions of all components were optimized along the entire neutron path (Fig. 5(b)). When determining the ability of the neutron spin to follow the magnetic field transitions along its trajectory, the evolution of the adiabaticity parameter (κ) is always used as a reference. This parameter is defined as the ratio of the Larmor precession frequency ωL to the changing rate of magnetic field direction ωB [36], κ=ωLωB=γnBdθB/dsmλh, (3) where γn is the neutron gyromagnetic ratio, h is Planck’s constant, θB is the angle of the magnetic field vector, and s is the distance travelled by neutrons. By applying the BlochSolver neutron-processing analysis software, as shown in Figure 5(c), the κ values at different positions were calculated based on the results of the magnetic field simulation. As represented by κ 1 (lg(κ) 0) at the position of the neutron spin flipper, the flipping process is proven to be nonadiabatic. By contrast, for other values, κ > 10 (lg(κ) >1) at the other positions indicate the neutron polarization is preserved or manipulated adiabatically, particularly at the positions near the gap between the magnet and coil guide fields, where the neutron polarization was adjusted to be parallel to the 3He polarization. The beamline setup was constructed on the basis of the aforementioned simulations. The initial and final neutron polarization states were manipulated by adjusting the working status of the flipper and flipping the 3He polarization through AFP, and four neutron transmission measurements were performed. Their results are labeled T++, T, T+-, and T-+, where the first index represents the flipper status and the second index represents the 3He polarization states. Hence, the overall beamline neutron polarization can be calculated using Eq. (2). The analyzing efficiency Pn (3He) of the 3He NSF system can also be determined independently from the neutron transmittances T0 and Tn, which can be given by[27, 28] Pn(3He)=T+TT++T=tanh(nσlP3He)=1T02Tn2. (4)

Fig. 5
(a) Magnetic field simulation according to the beamline configuration shown in Fig. 4 using the finite element method. (b) One-dimensional cut of the magnetic field strength distribution along the center of the neutron trajectory. (c) Calculated adiabaticity parameter based on the field distribution shown in (b) for the 2 Å neutrons. The dashed boxes in (b) and (c) represent the non-adiabatic transition area at the position of the yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) thin film and the adiabatic transition area between the guide field components, respectively.
pic

Additionally, a neutron polarization analysis method was applied to demonstrate that the flipping and polarizing efficiencies of the flipper and supermirror could be differentiated and derived from the above measurements. As indicated by the black curve in Fig. 6, the setup shown in Fig 4 with the neutron spin flipper turned on and the 3He polarization flipped (T++ and T+-) is capable of providing effective neutron polarization. Furthermore, no obvious neutron polarization loss induced by the flipper or 3He AFP was observed in further measurements. The combination of the neutron polarization instruments listed above enabled a neutron polarization of more than 90% over 3 Å to be achieved, and the polarization at shorter wavelengths was improved to 50% at approximately 2 Å when the in-situ 3He NSF system was applied as an analyzer instead of the supermirror. The analysis efficiency of the in-situ 3He NSF system was calculated using equation (4) and is shown as the blue curve plotted in Fig. 6. Accordingly, the neutron polarization is 90% at 2.2 Å and reaches 99% at 4.1 Å. The red curve shows the derived polarizing efficiency of the supermirror used on BL-20, above its critical wavelength of 2 Å and the efficiency rapidly increases to reach more than 90% at 2.4 Å. Comparing the neutron polarization performances collected by different beamline setups, the performance of the 3He NSF polarizer surpasses that of the polarizing supermirror polarizer at wavelengths below approximately 2.3 Å, whereas the performance of the supermirror is more stable and consistent at longer wavelengths, which is in accordance with the characteristics of these components.

Fig. 6
(Color online) Neutron polarization plotted as a function of the neutron wavelength. The black curve represents the neutron polarization of the overall beamline setup shown in Fig. 4. The blue curve represents the analyzing efficiency of the 3He analyzer, obtained from the neutron transmission measurements with an in-situ system. The red curve shows the polarizing efficiency of the supermirror polarizer determined from the neutron polarization of the beamline setup and the in-situ system.
pic
4

Conclusion

A new development platform for testing polarized neutron techniques with pulsed neutrons was verified at the neutron technology development beamline BL-20 at CSNS. Different combinations of polarized neutron instruments were used to assess the neutron beam polarization performance, including the utilization of 3He NSF systems as neutron spin polarizer and analyzer, as well as the replacement of the 3He NSF with a polarizing supermirror and neutron spin flipper to manipulate incident neutron polarization. Based on the design of the guide-field system supported by the simulation of the magnetic field, the neutron polarization of the former polarized neutron beam setup reached over 90% at 3.1 Å and was maximized at 94.5%, remaining stable within a difference of 1% over 14.5 h. The latter achieved neutron polarization of 50% at 2 Å, more than 90% over 3 Å, and maximum polarization of 96.5 %.

As evidenced by the diversity of the polarized-neutron setup at BL-20, the polarized neutron technique developed at CSNS is capable of supporting experiments with varied requirements in a wide range of research fields, and its feasibility makes it suitable for application to neutron beamlines at CSNS. Future developments aim to focus on improving the performance of the polarized neutron setup at BL-20 and the upcoming new testing beamline BL-8A. As well as the application to spectrometers that are currently under construction at CSNS that have corresponding requirements, such as the Very Small-Angle Neutron Scattering spectrometer and the Direct-Geometry Polarized Inelastic spectrometer.

References
1. H. A. Mook, M. Yethiraj, G. Aeppli et al.,

Polarized neutron determination of the magnetic excitations in YBa2Cu3O7

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3490 (1993). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3490
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. D. Givord, H. S. Li and F. Tasset,

Polarized neutron study of the compounds Y2Fe14B and Nd2Fe14B

. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 4100 (1985). doi: 10.1063/1.334631
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. S. Tomiyoshi and Y. Yamaguchi,

Magnetic Structure and Weak Ferromagnetism of Mn3Sn Studied by Polarized Neutron Diffraction

. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 2478-2486 (1982). doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.51.2478
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. Y. Nambu, J. Barker, Y. Okino et al.,

Observation of Magnon Polarization

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 027201 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.027201
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. T. Fennell, P. P. Deen, A. R. Wildes et al.,

Magnetic Coulomb Phase in the Spin Ice Ho2Ti2O7

. Science 326, 415-417 (2009). doi: 10.1126/science.1177582
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. L. Mangin-Thro, Y. Sidis, A. Wildes et al.,

Intra-unit-cell magnetic correlations near optimal doping in YBa2Cu3O6.85

. Nat. Comm. 6, 7705 (2015). doi: 10.1038/ncomms8705
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. T. Berlijn, P. C. Snijders, O. Delaire et al.,

Itinerant Antiferromagnetism in RuO2

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 077201 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.077201
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. D. Senff, P. Link, K. Hradil et al.,

Magnetic Excitations in Multiferroic TbMnO3: Evidence for a Hybridized Soft Mode

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 137206 (2007). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.137206
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. P. Liu, M. L. Klemm, L. Tian et al.,

In-plane uniaxial pressure-induced out-of-plane antiferromagnetic moment and critical fluctuations in BaFe2As2

. Nat. Comm. 11, 5728 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19421-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. Z. Fu, Y. Xiao, A. Feoktystov et al.,

Field-induced self-assembly of iron oxide nanoparticles investigated using small-angle neutron scattering

. Nanoscale 8, 18541-18550 (2016). doi: 10.1039/C6NR06275J
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. K. V. O’Donovan, J. A. Borchers, C. F. Majkrzak et al.,

Pinpointing Chiral Structures with Front-Back Polarized Neutron Reflectometry

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067201 (2002). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.067201
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. H. Chen and X. Wang,

China’s first pulsed neutron source

. Nat. Mater. 15, 689-691 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nmat4655
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. J. Wei, S. Fu, J. Tang et al.,

China Spallation Neutron Source - an overview of application prospects

. Chinese Phys. C 33, 1033 (2009). doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/11/021
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. J. Tang, Q. An, J. Bai et al.,

Back-n white neutron source at CSNS and its applications

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 11 (2021). doi: 10.1007/s41365-021-00846-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. Z. Fu, Y. Xiao, A. Feoktystov et al.,

Field-induced self-assembly of iron oxide nanoparticles investigated using small-angle neutron scattering

. Nanoscale, 8, 18541-18550 (2016). doi: 10.1039/C6NR06275J
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. T. Köhler, A. Feoktystov, O. Petracic et al.,

Mechanism of magnetization reduction in iron oxide nanoparticles

. Nanoscale, 13, 6965-6976 (2021). doi: 10.1039/D0NR08615K
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. J. Zhao, F. C. Niestemski, S. Kunwar et al.,

Electron-spin excitation coupling in an electron-doped copper oxide superconductor

. Nat. Phys. 7, 719-724 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nphys2006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. H. Luo, M. Wang, C. Zhang et al.,

Spin Excitation Anisotropy as a Probe of Orbital Ordering in the Paramagnetic Tetragonal Phase of Superconducting BaFe1.904Ni0.096As2

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 107006 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.107006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. K. Oikawa, F. Maekawa, M. Harada et al.,

Design and application of NOBORU—NeutrOn Beam line for Observation and Research Use at J-PARC

. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A. 589, 310-317 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.02.019
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. R. Woracek, T. Hofmann, M. Bulat et al.,

The test beamline of the European Spallation Source – Instrumentation development and wavelength frame multiplication

. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A. 839, 102-116 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.09.034
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. X. Jiang, J. Zhou, H. Luo et al.,

A large-area 3He tube array detector with vacuum operation capacity for the SANS instrument at CSNS

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 89 (2022). doi: 10.1007/s41365-022-01067-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. T. Okudaira, T. Oku, T. Ino et al.,

Development and application of a 3He Neutron Spin Filter at J-PARC

. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A. 977, 164301 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. M. Harada, M. Teshigawara, M. Ooi et al.,

Experimental characterization of high-energy component in extracted pulsed neutrons at the J-PARC spallation neutron source

. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A. 1000, 165252 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2021.165252
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. Y. Kamiya, T. Miyoshi, H. Iwase et al.,

Development of a neutron imaging sensor using INTPIX4-SOI pixelated silicon devices

. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A. 979, 164400 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164400
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. C. Huang, J. Zhang, F. Ye et al.,

Development of a Spin-Exchange Optical Pumping-Based Polarized 3He System at the China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS)

. Chinese Phys. Lett. 9, 092801 (2021). doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/38/9/092801
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. Z. Qin, C. Huang, Z. N. Buck et al.,

Development of a 3He Gas Filling Station at the China Spallation Neutron Source

. Chinese Phys. Lett. 38, 052801 (2021). doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/38/5/052801
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. J. Zhang, C. Huang, Z. Qin et al.,

In situ optical pumping for polarizing 3He neutron spin filters at China Spallation Neutron Source

. Sci. China Phys. Mech. 65, 4 (2022). doi: 10.1007/s11433-021-1876-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. M. Batz, S. Baeβler, W. Heil et al.,

3He Spin Filter for Neutrons

. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 110, 293-298 (2005). doi: 10.6028/jres.110.042
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. M. R. Fitzsimmons and C.F. Majkrzak, Modern Techniques for Characterizing Magnetic Materials, First edn. (MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2005), pp. 44-47.
30. A. Salman, J. Zhou, J. Yang et al.,

Development of Time-of-Flight polarized neutron imaging at the China Spallation Neutron Source

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 39, 062901 (2022). doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/39/6/062901
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31. F. Radua, A. Vorobiev, J. Major et al.,

Spin-resolved off-specular neutron scattering from magnetic domain walls using the polarized 3He gas spin filter

. Physica B 335, 63-67 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0921-4526(03)00192-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32. V. Lauter-Pasyuk, H. J. Lauter, G. P. Gordeev et al.,

Nanoparticles in Block-Copolymer Films Studied by Specular and Off-Specular Neutron Scattering

. Langmuir 19, 7783-7788 (2003). doi: 10.1021/la026818a
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33. C. Schanzer, M. Schneider and P. Böni,

Neutron Optics: Towards Applications for Hot Neutrons

. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 746, 012024 (2016). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/746/1/012024
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34. Y. Dong, T. Wang, K. Wolfgang et al.,

Miniaturized time-of-flight neutron spin flipper using a high-TC superconductor

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 145 (2022). doi: 10.1007/s41365-022-01134-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35. COMSOL AB, COMSOL Multiphysics® v.6.0 cn.comsol.com. Stockholm, Sweden
36. F. Bloch,

Nuclear induction

. Phys. Rev. 70, 460-474 (1946). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.70.460
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
Footnote

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.