logo

Multireference covariant density functional theory for shape coexistence and isomerism in 43S

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Multireference covariant density functional theory for shape coexistence and isomerism in 43S

En-Fu Zhou
Xian-Ye Wu
Jian Xiang
Jiang-Ming Yao
Peter Ring
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.37, No.7Article number 122Published in print Jul 2026Available online 11 Apr 2026
17102

We present a new development in the multireference covariant density functional theory (MR-CDFT) for the low-lying states of odd-mass nuclei by mixing configurations with different intrinsic quadrupole shapes and different K quantum numbers. All configurations are projected onto the good particle numbers and angular momenta. The success of this newly developed framework is illustrated in its application to the low-lying states of 43S near the neutron magic number N=28 with shape coexistence. Our results indicate that the ground state, , is predominantly composed of the intruder prolate one-quasiparticle (1qp) configuration ν1/2-[321]. In contrast, the state is identified as a high-K isomer, primarily built on the prolate 1qp configuration ν7/2-[303]. Additionally, the state is found to be an admixture dominated by an oblate configuration with = 1/2-, along with a small contribution from a prolate configuration with = 3/2-. These results demonstrate the capability of MR-CDFT to capture the intricate interplay among shape coexistence, configuration mixing, and isomerism in the low-energy structure of odd-mass nuclei around N = 28, without invoking triaxiality.

Nuclear Density Functional Theory and extensionsCollective levelsGenerator coordinate methodQuantum number projection
1

Introduction

The development of radioactive ion beam facilities [1-3] has significantly advanced nuclear physics research, enabling studies of nuclei far from the β-stability line, where the evolution of the nuclear shell structure and the emergence of exotic excitation modes have garnered considerable attention [4-7]. A striking example is the evolution of the N=28 shell gap, a magic number that arises from strong spin-orbit coupling in the single-nucleon potential [8, 9], which drives the f7/2 orbital significantly lower than the p3/2 orbital. Experimental data reveal a gradual weakening of the N=28 shell gap in isotones lighter than 48Ca. For instance, measurements of the β-decay half-lives of 44S and 45Cl revealed deviations from shell model predictions based on spherical configurations [10], indicating the weakening of the N=28 shell effect. Subsequent Coulomb excitation experiments observed low excitation energies of the states and enhanced electric quadrupole transition strengths in 40,42,44S [11, 12]. Similar behavior has been reported in neighboring nuclei, such as 42Si [13-15] and 40Mg [16]. These observations indicate the onset of strong quadrupole collectivity in neutron-rich N=28 isotones with proton number Z<18, leading to the crossing of the ν1/2-[321] component of the 2νp3/2 orbital with the ν7/2-[303] component of the 1νf7/2 orbital. Consequently, several near-degenerate configurations with admixtures of 1f7/2 and 2p3/2 orbitals coexist at similar energies within these nuclei. In the case of 44S, two coexisting low-lying 0+ states have been observed [17], suggesting a spherical-deformed shape coexistence. The onset of a deformed ground state in 44S is supported by quantum-number-projected generator coordinate method (GCM) studies based on the Gogny force [18, 19] and a collective Hamiltonian study based on a relativistic energy density functional (EDF) [20]. These two theoretical studies reveal a general trend in shape evolution, that is, the predominant shape transitions from a γ-soft, moderately deformed configuration with to a strongly prolate shape with as the angular momentum increases up to J=4 in the ground-state band. This rotational band coexists with a strongly prolate-deformed state characterized by . The specific deformation parameter β2 of the dominant configuration depends on the details of the employed EDF. The two-proton knockout reaction from 46Ar identified the state as an isomeric state [21], which, in combination with shell-model calculations, was suggested to exhibit a strong prolate deformation. A half-life measurement revealed a hindered E2 transition with W.u. [22], supporting the interpretation of the state as a K=4 isomer. Shell-model studies further indicate that this state is predominantly characterized by the two-quasiparticle configuration [23].

The odd-mass neutron-rich sulfur isotope 43S exhibits a more complex low-energy structure than 44S owing to the interplay between the single-particle motion of the unpaired neutron and the collective excitations of the 42S core. The mass measurements, combined with theoretical studies based on the shell model and relativistic mean-field (RMF) theory, suggested the coexistence of a prolate deformed ground state and an isomeric state in 43S [24]. Subsequent g-factor measurements [25], along with shell-model calculations and the collective Hamiltonian approach based on the Gogny force, determined the spin-parity of the isomeric state as at an excitation energy of 320.5(5) keV. These studies also established the intruder nature of the ground state with K=1/2 [25], while initially suggesting that the isomeric state was quasispherical. However, later measurements of the spectroscopic quadrupole moment of the isomeric state yielded e fm2 [26], which was significantly larger than the expected value for a single-particle state. This observation indicates the strong collective nature of the isomeric state, which is further supported by shell-model calculations [26]. The structure of 43S was investigated using antisymmetrized molecular dynamics plus GCM (AMD+GCM), which predicted a prolate-deformed ground state, a triaxially deformed state, and an oblate-deformed excited band atop the state at low excitation energy [27]. In contrast, a recent shell-model study suggested that the prolate ground-state band coexists with a triaxial band built on the isomer and an excited prolate structure associated with the =5/2- deformed orbital [28]. Meanwhile, the angular-momentum-projected variation-after-projection (AMP+VAP) approach suggests that the ground state and the state are dominated by K=1/2 and K=7/2, respectively, classifying the state as a high-K isomer [23]. Experimental lifetime measurements of excited states provide the first evidence of a doublet of states. Together with shell-model and AMD calculations, these results suggest the possible existence of three coexisting bands built upon the , , and states [29]. Furthermore, Coulomb excitation experiments have shown that the intraband B(E2) values for the transitions within the ground-state band and the isomeric band are large and nearly equal [30], which was also found in the study of the valence space in-medium similarity renormalization group [31].

Over the past decades, covariant density functional theory (CDFT) has achieved remarkable success in various areas of nuclear physics [32-38]. A key advantage of the CDFT is that Lorentz invariance imposes strict constraints on the number of parameters in the EDF. Moreover, the relativistic framework naturally accounts for the spin-orbit interaction, whereas time-odd fields are incorporated without introducing additional free parameters. This characteristic is particularly crucial for accurately describing odd-mass nuclei and their rotating systems. To restore the missing quantum numbers, including particle numbers and angular momentum, in the solution of CDFT and to consider the shape-mixing effect, the multi-reference covariant density functional theory (MR-CDFT) was developed [39-41] and successfully applied to study low-lying spectra in even-even nuclei with either triaxial or octupole shapes [42-45]. The MR-CDFT has also been applied to the studies of neutrinoless double-beta decay [46-51] and the low-lying states of hypernuclei [52-54].

Recently, the MR-CDFT was successfully extended to describe low-lying states in odd-mass nuclei [55]. In this work, we present a new development in the MR-CDFT for the low-lying states of odd-mass nuclei by mixing the configurations not only with different intrinsic quadrupole shapes, but also with different K quantum numbers. All the configurations are projected onto good particle numbers and angular momenta. This newly-developed framework offers an alternative and computationally efficient approach to account for the triaxiality effects in nuclear low-lying states, avoiding the need for full three-dimensional angular momentum projection [39], which is numerically demanding. The success of our framework is demonstrated through its application to the low-energy structure of 43S. It is worth noting that a similar idea has been implemented in the projected shell model (PSM) to study the effect of K-mixing on isomeric states in even-even isotopes with N = 104 [56], although the effect of shape mixing was not included in that study. Our extended MR-CDFT enables us to identify the dominant mechanism responsible for the formation of the isomeric state, shedding new light on the interplay among shape coexistence, K-mixing, and isomerism in the low-energy structure of odd-mass nuclei.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we present the extended framework of MR-CDFT for odd-mass nuclei. The results of the calculations for 43S are discussed in Sect. 3. The conclusions of this study are summarized in Sect. 4.

2

The MR-CDFT for odd-mass nuclei

The MR-CDFT theory for the low-lying states of odd-mass nuclei was introduced in detail in Ref. [55]. Here, we only present a brief description of the extension of this theory, in which the wave functions of low-lying states are constructed as a mixing of configurations with different deformation parameter q and quantum number K,pic(1)Here, c is a collective label for (K, q), and α distinguishes states with the same angular momentum J. The basis function with quantum numbers (NZJπ) is given bypic(2)where and are projection operators that select components with angular momentum J and neutron(proton) number N(Z) [57].

The mean-field configurations for odd-mass nuclei are chosen as 1qp states,pic(3)where denotes a quasiparticle vacuum state with even number parity obtained through the false quantum vacuum (FQV) scheme [55] in the single reference (SR)-CDFT calculation starting from a relativistic EDF [34, 58]. In this scheme, the time-reversal invariance is preserved [59]. The quasiparticle creation operator α switches the number parity to odd. The index κ distinguishes different quasiparticle states. In this study, axial symmetry was assumed. In this case, each configuration is labeled with the quantum numbers , determined by the quantum numbers Ωπ of the blocked orbital. In the configuration-mixing calculation, only the lowest-energy quasiparticle configuration with a given is included for each deformed configuration. In addition to the configurations employed in Ref. [55], we also mixed the configurations with different K values.

The weight function in Eq. (1) is determined by the variational principles that lead to the following Hill-Wheeler-Griffin (HWG) equation [57, 60],pic(4)where the Hamiltonian kernel and norm kernel are defined bypic(5)with the operator representing and 1, respectively. In the present study, based on a covariant EDF, the mixed-density prescription is employed in the evaluation of the Hamiltonian kernel. Details of the calculation of the kernels in Eq. (5) can be found in Ref. [55].

The HWG equation (4) for a given set of quantum numbers (NZJπ) is solved in the standard way, as discussed in Refs. [40, 57]. This is done by first diagonalizing the norm kernel . A new set of basis functions is then constructed using the eigenfunctions of the norm kernel with eigenvalues larger than a pre-chosen cutoff value, which removes the possible redundancy in the original basis. The Hamiltonian is diagonalized using this new basis. In this way, the energies and the mixing weights of the nuclear states can be obtained. Since the basis functions are nonorthogonal to each other, one usually introduces the collective wave function as belowpic(6)which fulfills the normalization condition. The distribution of over K and q reflects the contribution of each basis function to the nuclear state . With the mixing weight , it is straightforward to determine the observables of nuclear low-lying states, including the electric quadrupole moment Qs, magnetic dipole moment μ, and the E2 and M1 transition strengths. The strength of the () transition from the initial state to the final state is determined bypic(7)where the configuration-dependent reduced matrix element is simplified as follows,pic(8)where represents either an electric (L=λ) or magnetic (L=λ+1) multipole operator and . The detailed formulas can be found in Ref. [55].

3

Results and discussion

In the calculation of the mean-field configurations, Dirac spinors for single nucleons were solved using a harmonic oscillator (HO) basis with a major shell number of Nsh = 10, with frequency MeV. Pairing correlations between nucleons are treated within the BCS approximation using a density-independent δ force with a smooth cutoff [39, 61]. The PC-PK1 parameterization was employed for the relativistic EDF [58]. Even though PC-PK1 is not the best EDF, it is very successful in various nuclear structure studies [34]. Therefore, it is natural to continue using this EDF parameter set in the illustrative study of the low-lying states of 43S. In the calculation of the projected kernels , the number of mesh points in the interval [0, π] for the rotation angle β and the gauge angle φ were chosen as = 12 and = 7, respectively. These values are sufficient to achieve convergent results for 43S.

Figure 1(a) presents the energies of mean-field states from the SR-CDFT calculation based on the FQV scheme [55] as a function of the quadrupole deformation parameter . A pronounced energy minimum appears on the prolate side with , with a second minimum on the oblate side with , suggesting that 43S may exhibit coexisting prolate and oblate shapes in its low-lying states. This phenomenon can be understood from the Nilsson diagram of neutrons in 43S, as shown in Fig. 1(b). One can observe large shell gaps or low level densities on both prolate and oblate sides around the Fermi energy. Moreover, the downward ν1/2-[321] component of the 2νp3/2 orbital crosses with the upward ν7/2-[303] component of the 1νf7/2 orbital at around the Fermi energy. This crossing leads to the population of valence neutrons from ν7/2-[303] to ν1/2-[321]. This result is consistent with the AMD+GCM calculation [27]. On the oblate side, the N=28 shell gap increases with |β2|.

Fig. 1
(Color online) (a) Total energy of the mean-field states for 43S from the SR-CDFT calculation based on the FQV scheme, as a function of the quadrupole deformation parameter β2. (b) Nilsson diagram for neutrons in 43S, with the Fermi energies indicated by the pink squares. The numbers around the lines are the Nilsson quantum numbers [57]
pic

The wave functions of the mean-field states in Fig. 1(a) do not preserve the particle numbers or total angular momentum. By applying quantum-number projection operators onto the 1qp configurations with =1/2-, 3/2-, 5/2-, and 7/2-, c.f. Eqs. (2) and (3), one obtains the energies of the symmetry-conserved 1qp states in 43S, as displayed in Fig. 2. The low-lying states from the shape-mixing calculation are plotted at their mean quadrupole deformation , which is defined aspic(9)The energies of symmetry-conserving states with angular momentum J increasing from 1/2 to 9/2, projected out from the configurations with =1/2- as a function of the quadrupole deformation β2 are displayed in Fig. 2(a). Similar to the energy curve of the mean-field calculation shown in Fig. 1(a), all the projected energy curves present two energy minima on the prolate and oblate sides, with . It is interesting to note the change in the energy ordering of states with different angular momenta as a function of the deformation, as shown in Fig. 2(a). For configurations with β2>0.4, the energies of the projected states with ΔJ=1 follow the ordering of (1/2-, 3/2-, 5/2-, 7/2-, 9/2-), which are consistent with the strong coupling limit of the particle-rotor model (PRM) [57]. In contrast, for weakly deformed configurations with β2 < 0.3, the 1/2- state rises rapidly from the bottom as β2 decreases toward zero. When only the configurations of the oblate energy minima are considered, the energy ordering is (7/2-, 3/2-, 1/2-, 9/2-, 5/2-). After mixing the configurations with different shapes but the same quantum numbers =1/2-, the yrast states with the energy ordering of (3/2-, 1/2-, 5/2-, 7/2-) are mainly located around β2=0.3.

Fig. 2
(Color online) Energies of symmetry-conserving 1qp states with different angular momenta J in 43S for (a) = 1/2-, (b) = 3/2-, (c) = 5/2-, and (d) = 7/2-, as functions of the quadrupole deformation parameter β2. The discrete low-lying states obtained by mixing configurations of different shapes, but with fixed values, within the GCM framework are shown at their mean quadrupole deformation , as defined in Eq. (9)
pic

Figure 2(b), (c), and (d) display the energies of symmetry-conserving states with , projected out from the configurations with =3/2-, 5/2-, and 7/2-, as well as the two lowest energy states from the shape-mixing calculation. It can be seen that the energy level 7/2- dominated by the prolate configuration with =7/2- is the yrast state among all the =7/2- states. All states with the same quantum numbers , but with different can be mixed. The final states from the MR-CDFT calculation by mixing 1qp configurations with different deformations and values are plotted in Fig. 3(b). The distributions of the collective wave functions for the first two 3/2-, 5/2-, and 7/2- states are shown in the bottom panels of Fig. 3. It is seen that the main features of the measured low-lying states of 43S, cf. Fig. 3(a), are reasonably well reproduced only in the MR-CDFT calculations with the mixing of these two types of configurations.

Fig. 3
(Color online) Energy spectra and collective wave functions of low-lying states in 43S from MR-CDFT calculations. Experimental data [25, 30] are displayed in panel (a). Panel (b) shows the results including configuration mixing among states with different shapes and K values, while panel (c) presents the results of calculations by mixing only the configurations with different quadrupole deformations β2, where the blocked orbitals correspond to = 1/2- and 7/2-, respectively. The black and blue arrows indicate the B(E2) values (in units of e2 fm4) and B(M1) values (in units of ), respectively. The states dominated by a prolate (oblate) configuration, with a small admixture of oblate (prolate) components, are labeled as “(Prolate)” and “(Oblate)”, respectively. The distributions of the collective wave functions for the first two states with J = 3/2, 5/2, and 7/2 are shown in panels (d, e), (f, g), and (h, i), respectively
pic

Here, we summarize the main findings of the MR-CDFT study based on Fig. 3. The ground state () of 43S is predominantly characterized by a prolate-deformed configuration, ν1/2-[321], with = 1/2-. This can be understood from Fig. 2(a), which shows the potential energy surfaces with =3/2- projected from the configurations with =1/2- present a pronounced global energy minimum around β2=0.35 and a second minimum around β2=-0.35. These energies are much lower than those with =3/2- but projected from the configurations with =3/2-. Thus, it is expected that the lowest =3/2- state is dominated by configurations with =1/2- instead of those with =3/2-. In contrast, the state is dominated by an oblate configuration with and = 1/2-, with a small admixture of a prolate configuration having = 3/2-. In the AMD+GCM calculation [27], the state is dominated by an oblate configuration with = 3/2-, followed by the and states, forming an oblate rotational band. As shown in Fig. 3(b), we predict a strong E2 transition between the and states, whereas the E2 transition from the to the state is much weaker. This behavior can be understood from Fig. 3(g), which shows that the state is dominated by a prolate-deformed configuration with = 5/2-, in contrast to the oblate structure of the state.

The first excited state of 43S, , shares a similar predominant configuration with the ground state and exhibits a strong E2 transition to the ground state. The MR-CDFT predicts e2 fm4, as well as a sizable M1 transition, with , as shown in Fig. 3(b). In the AMD+GCM [27], these numbers are 180 e2 fm4 and , respectively. The value of has not yet been measured, but experimental data are available for [29], which is underestimated by both methods. We find that this underestimation is due to the extension of the wave function of the state into the region of large prolate deformation with β2 > 0.4, as shown in Fig. 3(d). Moreover, we observe two ΔJ = 2 rotational bands, namely (, , ) and (, , ), which are connected by strong E2 transitions. The predicted e2 fm4 is slightly larger than the data 46(9) e2 fm4 [30]. All these states are predominantly characterized by the prolate-deformed configuration ν1/2-[321], originating from the spherical νp3/2 orbital, with deformation and = 1/2-, as shown in Fig. 1. The energy ordering of the (, , ) sequence follows the weak coupling limit of the PRM [57], which predicts a parabolic energy pattern with a minimum at .

Figure 3(h) shows that the state is dominated by the prolate deformed configuration ν7/2-[303] with and = 7/2-. Consequently, the decay of the state to the ground state (3/2-) is strongly quenched because of ΔK = 3. Quantitatively, the predicted e2 fm4, compared to the data 0.41 e2 fm4 [25]. Consequently, the state was classified as a high-K isomer state, consistent with the conclusions of previous studies [23, 28]. A comparison between Figs. 3(b) and (c) reveals that the excitation energy of the state decreases significantly and becomes closer to the experimental value after incorporating 1qp configuration mixing with different values. In contrast, the oblate nature in Fig. 3(c) is pushed very high and is not shown in Fig. 3(b). As shown in Fig. 3(h), the isomeric state also contains a small admixture of an oblate configuration with = 1/2-. The remaining discrepancy is expected to be reduced by explicitly including the triaxial deformation effect, as suggested by the AMD+GCM calculation [27].

Table 1 lists the spectroscopic quadrupole moments Qs and magnetic dipole moments μ for 43S obtained from the MR-CDFT calculations with 1qp configuration mixing involving different quadrupole deformations β2 and values, in comparison with the results of AMD+GCM calculations [27] and available data for the isomer state with e fm2 and μN. Overall, the results from MR-CDFT and AMD+GCM were similar, with both models reasonably reproducing the experimental data. Quantitatively, the Qs values of the states in the ground-state band predicted by MR-CDFT are slightly smaller than those from AMD+GCM. Notably, the magnetic moments of the and states obtained using MR-CDFT are only approximately half of the values predicted by AMD+GCM. In particular, a significant discrepancy was found in the prediction for the state. Although the AMD+GCM calculation suggests that this state is dominated by an oblate configuration, the MR-CDFT result favors a prolate deformation, consistent with the latest shell-model calculations [28]. According to the MR-CDFT calculations, the state primarily originates from blocking the Ωπ = 5/2- component of the spherical νf7/2 state at a deformation of β2 = 0.3, as evidenced by the collective wave function shown in Fig. 3(g). This state serves as the bandhead of a rotational band built on a prolate shape, as illustrated in the low-lying spectrum of 43S in Fig. 3(b). In contrast, AMD+GCM calculations [27] indicate that this excited band is dominated by the oblate component Ωπ = 3/2- of the spherical νf7/2 state. Interestingly, the MR-CDFT calculations also predict an oblate arising from blocking the Ωπ = 3/2- orbital of the νf7/2 state with an excitation energy of approximately 2.5 MeV. This state has a different structure from the oblate state, which is dominated by the configuration of =1/2-, see Fig. 3(e). Moreover, as seen from Table 1, the spectroscopic quadrupole moment Qs and magnetic dipole moment μ of our state are close to those of the state predicted by the AMD+GCM approach. Whether the second state is predominantly prolate or oblate can be clarified by future measurements of its electromagnetic properties.

Table 1
The spectroscopic quadrupole moments and magnetic dipole moments for 43S based on MR-CDFT calculations, in comparison with the prediction of AMD+GCM calculations [27] and data [26]
Qs (e fm2) μ(μN)
Exp. MR-CDFT AMD Exp. MR-CDFT AMD
- - - - 0.48 0.71
- -13.0 -13.2 - -0.76 -0.60
- -17.4 -20.1 - 1.49 1.45
- -18.9 -22.0 - -0.12 -0.24
- -24.1 -21.4 - 2.20 1.26
- 9.2 12.1 - -0.54 -0.82
- 18.1 -7.0 - -0.85 0.14
- -4.0 - - 0.18 -
23(3) 20.9 26.1 -1.110(14) -0.93 -1.08
- 4.9 7.3 - 0.08 -0.19
Show more
4

Summary

In this study, we extended the multireference covariant density functional theory (MR-CDFT) for odd-mass nuclei by incorporating particle-number and angular-momentum projections, along with the simultaneous mixing of quasiparticle configurations characterized by different quadrupole deformations and K quantum numbers. The effectiveness of this extended framework is demonstrated through its application to the low-lying states of 43S, where the available experimental data on the energy spectra, electric quadrupole and magnetic dipole transition strengths, and electromagnetic moments are reproduced with reasonable accuracy.

Our calculations reveal a pair of prolate rotational bands with ΔJ = 2, built on the ground-state configuration ν1/2-[321] ( = 1/2-), consistent with the weak-coupling limit of the particle-rotor model. A rotational band is also found based on the ν7/2-[303] ( = 7/2-) configuration, corresponding to the isomeric state, which is identified as a high-K isomer. These findings are generally consistent with those from AMD+GCM and shell-model calculations, supporting the erosion of the N=28 shell gap. We also identify a state dominated by an oblate configuration with = 1/2-, where the valence neutron occupies the ν1/2-[330] orbital. Furthermore, we predict and states, which are dominated by a prolate configuration with = 5/2- and an oblate configuration with = 3/2-, respectively. This result is slightly different from the predictions of AMD+GCM with explicit inclusion of triaxiality, which suggests that the state is dominated by the oblate configuration with = 3/2-. This discrepancy calls for further clarification through additional lifetime measurements.

It is worth emphasizing that the present framework is based on axially deformed quasiparticle configurations, with triaxial effects partially incorporated through explicit K-mixing. This makes it a computationally efficient alternative to previous approaches that fully account for triaxiality and require a three-dimensional angular-momentum projection. The improved efficiency enables systematic beyond-mean-field studies of shape coexistence and isomeric states in heavy deformed odd-mass nuclei, such as 229Th.

References
1. Y. Yano,

The RIKEN RI Beam Factory Project: A status report

. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 261, 10091013 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.04.174
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. T. Glasmacher, B. Sherrill, W. Nazarewicz, et al.,

Facility for Rare Isotope Beams Update for Nuclear Physics News

. Nucl. Phys. News 27, 2833 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10619127.2017.1317176
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. Y. Ye, X. Yang, H. Sakurai, et al.,

Physics of exotic nuclei

. Nature Rev. Phys. 7, 2137 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00782-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. E. Caurier, G. Martinez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, et al.,

The Shell Model as Unified View of Nuclear Structure

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 427488 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.427
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. O. Sorlin, M.G. Porquet,

Nuclear magic numbers: New features far from stability

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61, 602673 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.05.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. T. Otsuka, A. Gade, O. Sorlin, et al.,

Evolution of shell structure in exotic nuclei

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015002 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015002
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. N. Tsunoda, T. Otsuka, K. Takayanagi, et al.,

The impact of nuclear shape on the emergence of the neutron dripline

. Nature 587, 6671 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2848-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. M.G. Mayer,

On closed shells in nuclei

. II. Phys. Rev. 75, 19691970 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.75.1969
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. O. Haxel, J.H.D. Jensen, H.E. Suess,

On the "magic numbers" in nuclear structure

. Phys. Rev. 75, 17661766 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.75.1766.2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. O. Sorlin, et al.,

Decay properties of exotic N ~ 28 S and Cl nuclei and the 48Ca/46Ca abundance ratio

. Phys. Rev. C 47, 29412953 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.47.2941
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. H. Scheit, et al.,

New Region of Deformation: The Neutron-Rich Sulfur Isotopes

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 39673970 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3967
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. T. Glasmacher, et al.,

Collectivity in 44S

. Phys. Lett. B 395, 163168 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00077-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. A. Gade, et al.,

Is the Structure of 42Si Understood? Phys

. Rev. Lett. 122, 222501 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.222501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. B. Bastin, et al.,

Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 022503 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.022503
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. S. Takeuchi, et al.,

Well-developed deformation in 42Si

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 182501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.182501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. H.L. Crawford, et al.,

First Spectroscopy of the Near Drip-line Nucleus 40Mg

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 052501 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.052501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. S. Grévy, F. Negoita, I. Stefan et al.,

Observation of the 0+2 state in 44S

. Europ. Phys. J. 25, 111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjad/i2005-06-179-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. T.R. Rodriguez, J.L. Egido,

Configuration mixing description of the nucleus 44S

. Phys. Rev. C 84, 051307 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.051307
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. J.L. Egido, M. Borrajo, T.R. Rodríguez,

Collective and Single-particle Motion in Beyond Mean Field Approaches

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 052502 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.052502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. Z.P. Li, J.M. Yao, D. Vretenar, et al.,

Energy density functional analysis of shape evolution in N=28 isotones

. Phys. Rev. C 84, 054304 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.054304
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. D. Santiago-Gonzalez, et al.,

Triple configuration coexistence in 44S

. Phys. Rev. C 83, 061305 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.061305
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. J.J. Parker, et al.,

Isomeric Character of the Lowest Observed 4+ State in 44S

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 052501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.052501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. Y. Utsuno, N. Shimizu, T. Otsuka, et al.,

Nature of isomerism in exotic sulfur isotopes

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 032501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.032501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. F. Sarazin, H. Savajols, W. Mittig, et al.,

Shape coexistence and the N=28 shell closure far from stability

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 50625065 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5062
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. L. Gaudefroy, et al.,

Shell Erosion and Shape Coexistence in 43S

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 092501 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.092501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. R. Chevrier, et al.,

Is the 7/21− Isomer State of 43S Spherical? Phys

. Rev. Lett. 108, 162501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.162501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. M. Kimura, Y. Taniguchi, Y. Kanada-En’yo, et al.,

Prolate, oblate, and triaxial shape coexistence, and the lost magicity of N = 28 in 43S

. Phys. Rev. C 87, 011301 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.011301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. R. Chevrier, L. Gaudefroy,

Shell model structure of 43S and 44S re-examined

. Phys. Rev. C 89, 051301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.051301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. T. Mijatović, et al.,

Lifetime Measurements and Triple Coexisting Band Structure in 43S

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 012501 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.012501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30. B. Longfellow, D. Weisshaar, A. Gade, et al.,

Shape Changes in the N=28 Island of Inversion: Collective Structures Built on Configuration-Coexisting States in 43S

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 232501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.232501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31. Q. Yuan, J.G. Li, W. Zuo,

Ab initio calculations for configuration-coexisting states in 45S: An extension from S43

. Phys. Rev. C 109, L041301 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.L041301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32. D. Vretenar, A. Afanasjev, G. Lalazissis, et al.,

Relativistic hartree–bogoliubov theory: static and dynamic aspects of exotic nuclear structure

. Physics Reports 409, 101259 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33. J. Meng, H. Toki, S.G. Zhou, et al.,

Relativistic Continuum Hartree Bogoliubov theory for ground state properties of exotic nuclei

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 470563 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.06.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34. J. Meng, Relativistic Density Functional for Nuclear Structure, Vol. 26, (World Scientific, 2016)
35. K.P. Geng, P.X. Du, J. Li, et al.,

Calculation of microscopic nuclear level densities based on covariant density functional theory

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01298-w
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36. W. Zhang, W. Gao, G.T. Zhang, et al.,

Level density of odd-A nuclei at saddle point

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01270-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37. Z.K. Li, Y.Y. Wang,

Robustness of the octupole collectivity in 144Ba within the cranking covariant density functional theory in 3D lattice

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 139 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01532-z
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
38. Y.M. Wang, Q.B. Chen,

Moments of inertia of triaxial nuclei in covariant density functional theory

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 183 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01552-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
39. J.M. Yao, J. Meng, P. Ring, et al.,

Three-dimensional angular momentum projection in relativistic mean-field theory

. Phys. Rev. C 79, 044312 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044312
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
40. J.M. Yao, J. Meng, P. Ring, et al.,

Configuration mixing of angular-momentum projected triaxial relativistic mean-field wave functions

. Phys. Rev. C 81, 044311 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.044311
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
41. T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, P. Ring,

Relativistic Nuclear Energy Density Functionals: Mean-Field and Beyond

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66, 519548 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2011.01.055
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
42. J.M. Yao, K. Hagino, Z.P. Li, et al.,

Microscopic benchmark study of triaxiality in low-lying states of 76Kr

. Phys. Rev. C 89, 054306 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.054306
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
43. J.M. Yao, E.F. Zhou, Z.P. Li,

Beyond relativistic mean-field approach for nuclear octupole excitations

. Phys. Rev. C 92, 041304 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.041304
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
44. E.F. Zhou, J.M. Yao,

Generator coordinate method for nuclear octupole excitations: Status and perspectives

. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 32, 2340011 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301323400116
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
45. X.Y. Wu, J.Z. Cao, K.N. Zhao, et al.,

Static or dynamic pear shapes in radioactive nucleus 224Rn? Nucl

. Sci. Tech. 35, 202 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01578-z
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
46. L.S. Song, J.M. Yao, P. Ring, et al.,

Relativistic description of nuclear matrix elements in neutrinoless double-β decay

. Phys. Rev. C 90, 054309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054309
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
47. L.S. Song, J.M. Yao, P. Ring, et al.,

Nuclear matrix element of neutrinoless double-β decay: Relativity and short-range correlations

. Phys. Rev. C 95, 024305 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024305
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
48. J.M. Yao, L.S. Song, K. Hagino, et al.,

Systematic study of nuclear matrix elements in neutrinoless double-β decay with a beyond-mean-field covariant density functional theory

. Phys. Rev. C 91, 024316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024316
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
49. J.M. Yao, J. Meng, Y.F. Niu, et al.,

Beyond-mean-field approaches for nuclear neutrinoless double beta decay in the standard mechanism

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 126, 103965 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103965
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
50. Y. Li, X. Zhang, G. Giacalone, et al.,

Benchmarking Nuclear Matrix Elements of 0νββ Decay with High-Energy Nuclear Collisions

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 022301 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/zymp-tyjj
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
51. J. Jia,

Bridging nuclear physics across energy scales: from neutrinoless double-beta decay to high-energy heavy-ion collisions

. Nuclear Science and Techniques 36, 207 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01800-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
52. H. Mei, K. Hagino, J.M. Yao,

Generator coordinate method for hypernuclear spectroscopy with a covariant density functional

. Phys. Rev. C 93, 011301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.011301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
53. H. Xia, X. Wu, H. Mei, et al.,

Beyond mean-field approach for pear-shaped hypernuclei

. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62, 42011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-018-9308-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
54. H. Xia, X. Wu, H. Mei, et al.,

The interplay of single-particle and collective motions in the low-lying states of Λ21 with quadrupole-octupole correlations

. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 252011 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-022-2045-x
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
55. E.F. Zhou, X.Y. Wu, J.M. Yao,

Multireference covariant density-functional theory for the low-lying states of odd-mass nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 109, 034305 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.034305
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
56. F.Q. Chen, Y. Sun, P.M. Walker, et al.,

Mixing effects on K-forbidden transition rates from the 6+ isomers in the N = 104 isotones

. J. Phys. G 40, 015101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/40/1/015101
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
57. P. Ring, P. Schuck, The nuclear many-body problem, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980)
58. P.W. Zhao, Z.P. Li, J.M. Yao, et al.,

New parametrization for the nuclear covariant energy density functional with point-coupling interaction

. Phys. Rev. C 82, 054319 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.054319
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
59. B. Bally, B. Avez, M. Bender, et al.,

Beyond Mean-Field Calculations for Odd-Mass Nuclei

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 162501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.162501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
60. D.L. Hill, J.A. Wheeler,

Nuclear constitution and the interpretation of fission phenomena

. Phys. Rev. 89, 11021145 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.1102
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
61. S.J. Krieger, P. Bonche, H. Flocard, et al.,

An improved pairing interaction for mean field calculations using skyrme potentials*

. Nucl. Phys. A 517, 275284 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(90)90035-K
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
Footnote

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.