Introduction
The study of baryon-antibaryon bound states dates back to the proposal by Fermi and Yang [1] to form pions from nucleon-antinucleon pairs. In the traditional one-boson-exchange theory of nucleon-nucleon interactions, it is shown that the nucleon-antinucleon system is more attractive than the nucleon-nucleon system owing to the strong ω-exchange [2]. Therefore, possible bound states and resonances of nucleon-antinucleon systems have been proposed for several years. An extensive and comprehensive review of the possible bound states of
More recently, the BESIII Collaboration reported the observation of a new X(1880) state in the line shape of the 3(π+ π-) invariant mass spectrum [4], which is considered as evidence for the existence of a proton-antiproton bound state. Many theoretical studies have been conducted to study the
In recent years, progress in understanding the strange dibaryon pΩ has renewed interest in dibaryon systems. The STAR Collaboration measured the pΩ correlation functions in Au+Au collisions at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) [16] and reported a positive scattering length for the pΩ interaction, which supports the hypothesis of a pΩ bound state. In addition, the ALICE Collaboration reported measurements of the p-Ω correlation in pp collisions at
The S=-3, I=1/2, J=2 NΩ state was first predicted by J. T. Goldman et al. as a narrow resonance in a relativistic quark model [58]. M. Oka also proposed the existence of a quasi-bound state with I(JP)=1/2(2+) using a constituent quark model [59]. A lattice QCD study by the HAL QCD Collaboration reported that the pΩ state is a bound state at a pion mass of 875 MeV [60]. Later, the bound nature was also confirmed with nearly physical quark masses (
By analogy to the nucleon-nucleon and nucleon-antinucleon systems, one may expect attractive interactions in both the pΩ and
In our previous work, we studied the pΩ interactions and correlation functions based on the quark delocalization color screening model (QDCSM) [72]. According to our calculations, the depletion of the pΩ correlation functions caused by the JP = 2+ bound state, which is not observed in the ALICE Collaboration’s measurements [17], can be explained by the contribution of the attractive JP = 1+ component in spin averaging. The QDCSM is a constituent quark model [73, 74] that introduces two key ingredients: first, quark delocalization, which accounts for orbital excitation by allowing quarks to delocalize from one cluster to another; second, the color screening factor, which modifies the confinement interaction between quarks in different clusters orbits. In the study of nucleon-nucleon and nucleon-hyperon interactions and the properties of the deuteron, the mechanism of quark delocalization and color screening plays a crucial role in generating intermediate-range attraction [75-77]. This model has also been used to investigate various dibaryon candidates, such as d* [78], pΩ [67, 72], and others [79-83]. It has been extended to study baryon-antibaryon systems, including
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. A brief introduction to the QDCSM is provided in the next section. The correlation function and inverse scattering method are introduced in Sect. 2.2 and Sect. 2.3, respectively. Section 3 presents to the numerical results and discussion of the study. A summary is presented in the final section.
Theoretical formalism
Quark delocalization color screening model
The details of the QDCSM employed in the present study can be found in Refs. [73-77]. Here, we present the salient features of this model. The model Hamiltonian is given by_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M001.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M002.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M003.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M004.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M005.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M006.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M007.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M008.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M009.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M010.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M011.png)
As for
| (MeV) | (MeV) | (fm) | (MeV · fm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (313) | 573 (539) | 0.518 (0.6) | 58.03 (18.53) |
| Λ0 | |||
| (MeV) | (fm-1) | (MeV) | |
| -1.29 (-0.33) | 0.510 (0.709) | 1.525 (1.722) | 445.81 (445.85) |
| 0.45(1.2) | 0.19(0.30) | 0.08 (0.08) |
| Baryon | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2(1/2+) | 939 | 939 (939) | |
| Δ | 3/2(3/2+) | 1232 | 1232 (1232) |
| Λ | 0(1/2+) | 1116 | 1124 (1118) |
| ∑ | 1(1/2+) | 1193 | 1238 (1224) |
| ∑* | 1(3/2+) | 1385 | 1360 (1358) |
| Ξ | 1/2(1/2+) | 1318 | 1374 (1365) |
| Ξ* | 1/2(3/2+) | 1533 | 1496 (1499) |
| Ω | 0(3/2+) | 1672 | 1642 (1654) |
In addition, quark delocalization was introduced to enlarge the model variational space to consider the mutual distortion or internal excitations of nucleons during the interaction. It is realized by specifying the single-particle orbital wave function of the QDCSM as a linear combination of left and right Gaussians, the single-particle orbital wave functions used in the ordinary quark cluster model_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M012.png)
Two-particle correlation function
Experimentally, the correlation function C(k) can be measured based on:_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M013.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M014.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M015.png)
For a pair of non-identical particles, such as _2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M016.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M017.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M018.png)
Considering the case of the S-wave, the wave function can be separated into a radial term Rk(r) and an angular term _2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M019.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M020.png)
Once the total interaction potential is determined, the radial Schrödinger equation can be solved as follows:_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M021.png)
Additionally, for the S-wave _2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M022.png)
Gel’fand-Levitan-Marchenko method for inverse scattering problem
To solve Eq. (20), two-body interaction potential V(r) is absolutely necessary. The QDCSM is a treatment of the few-body problem, which means that directly extracting a two-body interaction potential V(r) from it will not be so natural. Hence, the QDCSM can be employed to investigate the scattering processes, from which the desired potential can be obtained, because hadronization is fully incorporated in the model.
The approach we adopted to extract the two-body equivalent potential V(r) is the GLM method, which is a powerful tool in inverse scattering theory [94]. It can provide a systematic approach to reconstruct an equivalent potential from the scattering data of a specific process, which makes it a very classical “inverse problem”. Thus, this method provides another path to understand the nature of two-body interactions.
The key equation of the GLM method used in this study is the Marchenko equation [95, 96], which can be written in the S-wave case in an integration equation form as:_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M023.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M024.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M025.png)
Results and discussion
The S-wave _2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M026.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M027.png)
The binding energies of the
| |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| - | 2581 (2593) | 2571 (2575) | 10 (18) |
| - | 2581 (2593) | 2572 (2577) | 9 (16) |
From Table 3, we can see that both the JP=1- and JP=2-
To further study the interaction between nucleon and _2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M028.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M029.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-M030.png)
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-F001.jpg)
| |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1- | 2.43 (2.02) | 0.48 (0.50) | 7 (11) |
| 2- | 2.79 (2.10) | 0.81 (0.61) | 6 (11) |
From Table 4, our results show that the scattering lengths are positive for the
Moreover, by solving the inverse scattering problem, we can further study the behavior of the
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-F002.jpg)
In Fig. 2, panels (a) and (b), the correlation function affected only by the square potential is above unity in the low-energy region, which is due to the attractive interaction. The difference is that the weak attraction is not sufficient to form a bound state; therefore, the correlation function is always above unity, whereas the moderate attraction forms a shallow bound state. The existence of a bound state leads to the depletion of the correlation function; therefore, there exists a part below unity. After considering both the Coulomb interaction and square well potentials, which mainly dominate the low-energy region (0 MeV<k<25 MeV), the correlation function forms a peak-like structure. In panel (c), the correlation function remains below unity for a relatively strong attraction. A discussion of this phenomenon can be found in Refs. [39, 72]. After considering the Coulomb interaction, one can see that the correlation function in the low-energy region nearly coincides with the result obtained by considering only the Coulomb interaction. As the relative momentum k increases, the correlation function closely matches the result obtained by considering only a relatively strong attraction between the particles.
After replacing the square well potentials with the effective potentials obtained by solving the inverse scattering problem using the GLM method, which is briefly introduced in Sect. 2.3, we can study the correlation function of the
_2026_07/1001-8042-2026-07-126/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-07-126-F003.jpg)
In Fig. 3, panels (a)–(e), the dashed gray lines and the dotted orange lines represent the
While femtoscopic measurements in heavy-ion collisions provide important access to the
In recent years, experimental data on correlation functions have increased rapidly [18-24], providing unprecedented insights into hadron-hadron interactions across a variety of systems. Together with femtoscopic techniques, these studies open up new possibilities for extracting low-energy scattering parameters that are otherwise difficult to access. On the theoretical side, continuous progress in lattice QCD, effective field theory, and quark-model-based approaches has greatly enriched our understanding and offered valuable guidance for interpreting the experimental observations [25-57]. The synergy between experimental measurements and theoretical developments will not only deepen our knowledge of strong interactions, but also pave the way for future explorations of exotic hadronic states and nuclear physics [112-114]. In this context, it is well established that nucleon-nucleon and hyperon-nucleon interactions provide the basis for the formation of nuclei and hypernuclei [115-121], while antihyperon-antinucleon interactions give rise to anti-hypernuclei [122, 123]. An open question is whether antihyperon-nucleon interactions can also give rise to the formation of novel nuclear systems. As a continuation of the present study, we will further explore such systems based on the antihyperon-nucleon interactions obtained in this study.
Summary
In this study, we investigate the S-wave
By using the GLM method, we solve the inverse scattering problem and obtain the effective
Understanding hadron-hadron interactions is an important issue in the study of hadron physics. The study of the interaction between baryons and antibaryons in this work is also an effective method for testing this mechanism. The femtoscopic correlation function has become an important method for exploring hadron-hadron interactions, and further theoretical and experimental investigations are essential for a deeper understanding of such baryon-antibaryon systems.
Are mesons elementary particles? Phys
. Rev. 76, 1739 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.76.1739Current status of the relativistic two nucleon one boson exchange potential
. Phys. Rept. 13, 191 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(74)90008-8Quasinuclear and quark model baryonium: Historical survey
. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 86, 361 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(00)00587-9[BESIII], Observation of the anomalous shape of X(1840) in J/ψ→γ3(π+π−) indicating a second resonance near pp¯ threshold
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132,Meson production in J/ψ decays and J/ψ→NN¯γ process
. Nucl. Phys. B 1002,Reexamination of antinucleon-nucleon interactions in covariant chiral effective field theory
. Phys. Rev. C 110, 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.064002Possible mixing of a diquark-antidiquark with a pp¯ hadronic molecule
. Phys. Rev. D 110,Pole structures of the X(1840) or X(1835) and the X(1880)
. Phys. Rev. D 110,Revisiting the proton-antiproton scattering using a constituent-quark-model based coupled-channels calculation
. Phys. Lett. B 862,Coupled-channel analysis of the near-threshold e+e−→NN¯ cross sections
. Phys. Rev. D 111,Quantum numbers of the X(1880)
. Phys. Rev. D 113,[BESIII], Determination of spin-parity quantum numbers for the narrow structure near the pΛ¯ Threshold in e+e−→pK−Λ¯+c.c.
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131,Canonical interpretation of the newly observed JP=1+ structure X(2085)
. Phys. Rev. D 110,pΛ¯ final-state interaction in the reactions e+e−→K−pΛ¯ and J/ψ→K−pΛ¯
. Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 119 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01345-zThe spectra of pΛ¯ and pΣ¯ hexaquark states
. Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 693 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14356-x[STAR], The Proton-Ω correlation function in Au + Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV
. Phys. Lett. B 790, 490 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.01.055Unveiling the strong interaction among hadrons at the LHC
. Nature 588, 232 (2020) [erratum: Nature 590, E13 (2021)]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3001-6[STAR], Measurement of Interaction between Antiprotons
. Nature 527, 345 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15724Scattering studies with low-energy kaon-proton femtoscopy in proton–proton collisions at the LHC
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124,Study of the Strong Interaction Among Hadrons with Correlations at the LHC
. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 377 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-034438[ALICE], Experimental Evidence for an Attractive p-ϕ Interaction
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127,[ALICE], Exploring the N Λ–NΣcoupled system with high precision correlation techniques at the LHC
. Phys. Lett. B 833,[ALICE], First study of the two-body scattering involving charm hadrons
. Phys. Rev. D 106,[STAR], Light nuclei femtoscopy and baryon interactions in 3 GeV Au + Au collisions at RHIC
. Phys. Lett. B 864,Can we extract Lambda-Lambda interaction from two particle momentum correlation? Nucl
. Phys. A 670, 297 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00117-2ΛΛ interaction from relativistic heavy–ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 91,Hadron–hadron correlation and interaction from heavy–ion collisions
. Nucl. Phys. A 954, 294 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.05.010pΞ- Correlation in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions with Nucleon–Hyperon Interaction from Lattice QCD
. Nucl. Phys. A 967, 856 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.04.041Coupled-channel effects in hadron–hadron correlation functions
. Nucl. Phys. A 981, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.10.090K-p Correlation Function from High–Energy Nuclear Collisions and Chiral SU(3) Dynamics
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124,Femtoscopic correlations and the ΛcN interaction
. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00190-0Femtoscopic Study of N Ξ Interaction and Search for the H Dibaryon State Around the N Ξ Threshold
. Few Body Syst. 62, 42 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01626-zEffect of deuteron breakup on the deuteron–Ξ correlation function
. Phys. Rev. C 103,Deuteron-deuteron correlation function in nucleus–nucleus collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 104,Unfolding the effects of final–state interactions and quantum statistics in two-particle angular correlations
. Phys. Rev. C 104,Femtoscopic study of coupled–channels N Ξ and ΛΛ interactions
. Phys. Rev. C 105,Exploring the ∑+ p interaction by measurements of the correlation function
. Phys. Lett. B 829,Strangeness S = -2 baryon–baryon interactions and femtoscopic correlation functions in covariant chiral effective field theory
. Chin. Phys. C 47,Study of the DK interaction with femtoscopic correlation functions
. Phys. Rev. D 107,Distinguishing the spins of Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) with femtoscopic correlation functions
. Phys. Rev. D 108,Correlation function for the a0(980)
. Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 328 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12694-wFemtoscopic correlation function for the Tcc(3875)+ state
. Phys. Lett. B 846,Constraining the low-energy S = -2 meson–baryon interaction with two-particle correlations
. Phys. Rev. D 110,Correlation functions for the N*(1535) and the inverse problem
. Phys. Rev. D 109,Inverse problem in femtoscopic correlation functions: the Tcc(3875)+ state
. Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 187 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01650-1Correlation function for the Tbb state: Determination of the binding, scattering lengths, effective ranges, and molecular probabilities
. Phys. Rev. D 109,Correlation function and the inverse problem in the BD interaction
. Chin. Phys. C 48,Relevance of the coupled channels in the ϕp and ρ0p correlation functions
. Phys. Rev. D 111,Model independent analysis of femtoscopic correlation functions: An application to the Ds0*(2317)
. Phys. Lett. B 847,Femtoscopic signatures of the lightest S–wave scalar open–charm mesons
. Phys. Rev. D 108,Femtoscopy of D mesons and light mesons upon unitarized effective field theories
. Phys. Rev. D 108,A study of the ϕN correlation function
. Phys. Lett. B 860,How to unravel the nature of the ∑*(1430)(1/2-) state from correlation functions
. Phys. Rev. D 110,Femtoscopy correlation functions and mass distributions from production experiments
. Phys. Rev. D 110,Femtoscopic study of the Ωα interaction in heavy–ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 111,Theoretical study on Λα and Ξα correlation functions
. J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 1,Exploring the ϕ–α interaction via femtoscopic study
. Phys. Lett. B 866,Strangeness -3 dibaryons
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 627 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.627Flavor octet dibaryons in the quark model
. Phys. Rev. D 38, 298 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.298[HAL QCD], Spin–2 NΩ dibaryon from Lattice QCD
. Nucl. Phys. A 928, 89 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.05.014[HAL QCD], NΩ dibaryon from lattice QCD near the physical point
. Phys. Lett. B 792, 284 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.03.050Probing multistrange dibaryons with proton–omega correlations in high–energy heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 94,Probing ΩΩ and pΩ dibaryons with femtoscopic correlations in relativistic heavy–ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 101,Systematics of q–6 systems in a simple chromomagnetic model
. Phys. Rev. D 45, 4221 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.4221Mass spectra of NΩ dibaryons in the 3S1 and 5S2 channels
. Phys. Rev. D 103,Structures of N Omega and Delta Omega dibaryons
. Chin. Phys. Lett. 24, 389 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/24/2/024Further study of the NΩ dibaryon within constituent quark models
. Phys. Rev. C 92,N omega and delta omega dibaryons in SU(3) chiral quark model
. Eur. Phys. J. A 8, 417 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100530050052Ω–dibaryon production with hadron interaction potential from the lattice QCD in relativistic heavy–ion collisions
. Phys. Lett. B 811,Probing the internal structures of pΩ and ΩΩ with their production at the Large Hadron Collider
. Phys. Rev. C 110,Production of ΩNN and ΩΩN in ultra-relativistic heavy–ion collisions
. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 416 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10336-7Investigating the p–Ω interactions and correlation functions
. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68,Quark delocalization, color screening, and nuclear intermediate range attraction
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2901 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2901Quark delocalization, color screening, and NN intermediate range attraction: P waves
. Phys. Rev. C 53, 1161 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.53.1161Effective baryon baryon potentials in the quark delocalization and color screening model
. Nucl. Phys. A 657, 95 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00321-8Quark delocalization, color screening model and nucleon baryon scattering
. Nucl. Phys. A 673, 279 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00141-XPhenomenological study of hadron interaction models
. Phys. Rev. C 65,Quark models of dibaryon resonances in nucleon–nucleon scattering
. Phys. Rev. C 79,Fully heavy pentaquarks in quark models
. Phys. Rev. D 105,Pentaquark interpretation of Λc states in the quark model
. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 524 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11709-2Prediction of charmed–bottom pentaquarks in quark model
. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 610 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11810-6Investigating excited Ωc states from pentaquark perspective
. Phys. Rev. D 108,Prediction of Pcc states in a quark model
. Phys. Rev. D 109,Study of N anti–N interaction with channel-coupling in constituent quark models
. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 1231 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732311035481Study of pΛ¯ and pΣ¯ systems in constituent quark models
. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27,Quark model study of strange dibaryon resonances
. Phys. Rev. C 83,Constituent quark model study of the meson spectra
. J. Phys. G 31, 481 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/31/5/017[Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics
. Phys. Rev. D 110,Examining the crossover from hadronic to partonic phase in QCD
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100,Proton pictures of high-energy nuclear collisions
. Phys. Lett. B 70, 43 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(77)90340-9Detailed predictions for two pion correlations in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 42, 2646 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.42.2646Hadronic interferometry in heavy ion collisions
. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 42, 77 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.42.120192.000453A femtoscopic correlation analysis tool using the Schrödinger equation (CATS)
. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 394 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5859-0On reconstruction of the potential energy from phases of the scattered waves
. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 104, 695 (1955).Role of Levinson’s theorem in neutron deuteron quartet S wave scattering
. Phys. Rev. C 42,Resonances and off–shell characteristics of effective interactions
. Nucl. Phys. A 654, 597 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00316-4Modeling of nucleon-nucleon potentials, quantum inversion versus meson exchange pictures
. Lect. Notes Phys. 488, 124 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0104930Energy-independent complex S01NN potential from the Marchenko equation
. Phys. Rev. C 104,Energy-independent complex single-P-waves NN potential from the Marchenko equation
. Phys. Rev. C 107,Molecular Viewpoints in Nuclear Structure
. Phys. Rev. 52, 1083 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.52.1083Chapter V. A coupled channel variational method for microscopic study of reactions between complex nuclei
. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 62, 236 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.62.236Investigating Ξ resonances from a pentaquark perspective
. Phys. Rev. D 110,Correlation between the deuteron characteristics and the low–energy triplet np scattering parameters
. Phys. Atom. Nucl. 66, 1319 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1592586[ALICE], Search for a common baryon source in high–multiplicity pp collisions at the LHC
. Phys. Lett. B 811,[ALICE], Common femtoscopic hadron–emission source in pp collisions at the LHC
. Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 198 (2025) [erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 12 (2026)]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13793-yNovel model for particle emission in small collision systems
. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 590 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11774-7Investigating the pion emission source in pp collisions using the AMPT model with subnucleon structure
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 154 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01722-3Study of the deuterons emission time in pp collisions at the LHC via kaon–deuteron correlations
. Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 53 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01534-4Loosely–bound objects produced in nuclear collisions at the LHC
. Nucl. Phys. A 987, 144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.02.006Production of exotic hadrons in pp and nuclear collisions
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 55 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01664-wExotic Hadrons at LHCb
. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 74, 583 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102422-040628Measurement of 6H Ground State Energy in an Electron Scattering Experiment at MAMI-A1
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134,Hyperon–nucleon interaction within chiral effective field theory revisited
. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00100-4Observation of Directed Flow of Hypernuclei Λ3H and Λ4H in sNN=3 GeV Au+Au Collisions at RHIC
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130,Measurements of the lightest hypernucleus (Λ3H): progress and perspective
. Sci. Bull. 68, 3252 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.11.045Measurement of the lifetime and Λ separation energy of Λ3H
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131,Hypernuclei as a laboratory to test hyperon–nucleon interactions
. Nuc. Sci. Tech. 34, 97 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01248-6Perspectives for hyperon and hypernuclei physics
. Chin. Phys. Lett. 42,Observation of an Antimatter Hypernucleus
. Science 328, 58 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183980Observation of the antimatter hypernucleus Λ¯4H ¯
. Nature 632, 1026 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07823-0The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

