logo

Emergence of pygmy monopole strength in neutron-rich nickel isotopes

NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Emergence of pygmy monopole strength in neutron-rich nickel isotopes

Shuai Sun
Ya-Lu Wang
Miao Qi
Rong An
Li-Gang Cao
Feng-Shou Zhang
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.36, No.11Article number 219Published in print Nov 2025Available online 12 Sep 2025
12900

The continuum quasiparticle random phase approximation (CQRPA), which includes the Skyrme interaction for both ground and excited state calculations, is extended in a more consistent manner in the present work. The emergence, evolution, and origin of pygmy monopole strengths along the even-even Ni isotopes were investigated carefully within consistent Skyrme HF + BCS and CQRPA models. The SLy5 Skyrme interaction and density-dependent zero-range pairing interactions were adopted in the calculations. No pygmy monopole strength was observed in 70-78Ni. However, pronounced pygmy monopole strengths are clearly observed in 80-84Ni, which are attributed mainly to the neutron excitations from weakly bound orbitals into the continuum. The neutron states involved in the pygmy monopole strength include 1g9/2, 2d5/2, 3s1/2 and 2d3/2. We suggest that more efforts from experimental investigations of pygmy monopole resonance should be made to confirm or disprove the predictions from models in the future.

Pygmy monopole resonanceContinuum quasiparticle random phase approximationSkyrme energy density functional
1

Introduction

The multipole response and appearance of pygmy dipole resonance (PDR) in finite nuclei far from the β-stability line have become hot issues in nuclear physics [1, 2]. Pygmy dipole resonance, which corresponds to the collective motion between the neutron skin and saturated core, has gained considerable attention because of its important applications in nuclear astrophysics and nuclear physics [3-7]. For example, the PDR found in the isovector giant dipole resonance could have a pronounced effect on the neutron capture rate in r-process nucleosynthesis. The properties of PDR are also used to constrain the equation of state of asymmetric nuclear matter [8-12], it plays similar role as the neutron skin in nuclear physics [13, 14].

PDR has been widely studied over the years, both experimentally and theoretically, using various methods [15-28]. In contrast, pygmy monopole resonance (PMR) has been much less analyzed experimentally in neutron-rich nuclei, and it has been theoretically predicted in neutron-rich Mg [29, 30], Ca [30-32], Ni [30, 33, 34], Sn, and Pb [35-37] isotopes. The calculations were based mainly on discretized quasiparticle random phase approximation (QRPA) or the finite amplitude method. It has been shown that PMR may significantly reduce the incompressibility in the nucleus with pronounced neutron excess, which could provide a more general and deeper understanding of nuclear incompressibility in isospin asymmetric systems [35]. Therefore, the measurement of isoscalar giant monopole resonances (ISGMR) and confirming the existence of PMR in neutron-rich nuclei are very important in nuclear physics. Following the suggestion of theoretical results, the ISGMR was measured by Vandebrouck et al. in the neutron-rich nucleus 68Ni using inelastic α scattering at 50A MeV in inverse kinematics with the active target MAYA at GANIL [38, 39]. The pygmy monopole strength was observed at 12.9 MeV in addition to isoscalar giant monopole resonance. However, in the case of giant monopole resonance, excitations are usually built on the 2ℏω particle-hole configurations, which indicates that the particle states involved in all low-energy monopole excitations may be embedded in the continuum. Thus, correct treatment of the continuum in a neutron-rich nucleus is required to explain the experimental results.

In Refs. [40, 41], the nonrelativistic and relativistic continuum random phase approximations (CRPA) with Green’s function method were used to calculate the monopole strength distributions of 68,78Ni, and the calculations indicated that there was no pronounced monopole state below the excitation energy of 20 MeV. Instead, a shoulder structure appeared in the low-energy region. This suggests that the discretized RPA may not be applicable to the calculation of the monopole response in 68Ni, which should be replaced by the CRPA with Green’s function method. CRPA calculations show that there is no PMR for 68,78Ni. However, it is unclear whether PMR exists in more neutron-rich Ni isotopes. In this work, we focus on the evolution of ISGMR in neutron-rich Ni isotopes, particularly with respect to its low-energy strength.

The PMR in an open-shell nucleus cannot be accurately described by the CRPA with Green’s function method because the pairing correlation is not considered. Hagino and Sagawa formulated a continuum quasiparticle random phase approximation (CQRPA) for open-shell nuclei in the coordinate space representation in Ref. [42]. The nucleon-nucleon interactions for the ground state adopted the Woods-Saxon type. For the residual interactions in the CQRPA calculations, they used the t0 and t3 parts of the Skyrme residual interactions. In this study, we extend the CQRPA model in Ref. [42] in a more consistent manner and applied it to study the ISGMR in neutron-rich Ni isotopes. In the new CQRPA model, the Schrödinger equation with a Woods-Saxon mean-field potential was replaced by the Hartree-Fock mean field theory with the standard Skyrme interaction in the ground state calculations. The Landau-Migdal forms of residual interactions derived from the Skyrme energy density functional (EDF) are adopted in the CQRPA calculations.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we briefly introduce our theoretical framework. In Sect. 3, the CQRPA monopole strength distributions were investigated. The low-energy strengths of more neutron-rich Ni isotopes were studied carefully to explore the PMR. Finally, Sect. 4 provides summary and perspective.

2

Theoretical framework

In this work, the Skyrme Hartree-Fock + Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (HF+BCS) and CQRPA methods were employed to study pygmy monopole resonance in neutron-rich nickel isotopes. The Skyrme interaction is expressed as an effective zero-range force between nucleons with density- and momentum-dependent terms, which has been successfully applied in the description of various nuclear properties [43, 44]. In this study, the Skyrme force SLy5 [45] was adopted for ground and excited state calculations. The pairing correlation is generated by a density-dependent zero-range force Vpair(r1,r2)=V0[1η(ρ(r)ρ0)]δ(r1r2), (1) where ρ(r) is the particle density and ρ0=0.16 fm-3 is the density at nuclear saturation. η was set to 0.5, corresponding to a mixed pairing interaction. The pairing strength V0 is fixed to be 483.5 MeVfm3 by reproducing the empirical neutron gap in 74Ni (Δn=1.262 MeV) [46, 47]. This value was then extended to calculations of other nickel isotopes.

The CQRPA model is briefly reviewed as follows. Further details are provided in Ref. [42]. The CQRPA response function ΠCQRPA is governed by the Bethe-Salpeter (B-S) equation, its formalism generalized to the nuclear systems is given by ΠCQRPA=Π0+Π0VresΠCQRPA, (2) where 0(r,r;E) is the unperturbed response function, which can be given by Π0(r,r;E)=αβDαβ(r)Dαβ(r)(1Eα+EβEiη+1Eα+Eβ+Eiη)   αϕα(r)ϕα(r)vα2jklkjαlαYLjklk212L+1   ×{r|1Eα+h^λEiη+1Eα+h^λ+Eiη|rβδjk,jβδlk,lβϕβ(r)ϕβ(r)   (1Eα+εβλEiη+1Eα+εβλ+Eiη)} (3) where vα2, , and the occupation probability, quasiparticle energy, and radial wavefunction of the quasiparticle state α, respectively. Dαβ(r) is the matrix element expressed as Dαβ(r)=ϕα(r)ϕβ(r)jαlα||YL||jβlβuαvβ+()Lvαuβ2L+1(1+δα,β)1/2. (4) In Eq. (3), the first term represents the two-quasiparticle excitations within the pairing active space, whereas the second term corresponds to the transitions from the inside to the outside of the pairing active space. The terms, Vres in Eq. (2) are the residual interactions in the B-S equation, which are from the second derivative of the Skyrme EDF with respect to the proton and neutron densities and are expressed by the Landau-Migdal parameters [48] in this study.

The monopole strength distribution S(E) of the system to an external field Vext(r)=r2YLM(r^) is then given by S(E)=1πImdrdrVext(r)Π(r,r;E)Vext(r). (5) After that, various moments can be calculated by means of the equation mk=EkS(E)dE, (6) then one can obtain the constrained energy Econ and centroid energy Ecen Econ=m1m1,Ecen=m1m0. (7) Besides, the ratio of mk for the low-energy (LE) PMR to the total strength, namely R0ELEEkS(E)dE0EmaxEkS(E)dE, (8) is defined to quantify the evolution of the PMR with neutron excess, where ELE is set to 11 MeV and Emax is equal to 40 MeV.

3

Results and discussions

First, we briefly discuss the ground-state properties of the nickel isotopes. The ground-state properties of finite nuclei are depicted using the HF+BCS method [50-52]. The HF+BCS equation is solved in coordinate space, where the radial size is set to 20 fm, which guarantees that the results under study are stable.

Table 1 shows the binding energies per nucleon, the neutron (proton) separation energies, charge radii and neutron Fermi energies in even-even 68-84Ni isotopes calculated by using the SLy5 Skyrme interaction, meanwhile the calculated results are compared with the corresponding experimental data.

Table 1
The binding energies per nucleon Eb (MeV), the neutron (proton) separation energies Sn (Sp) (MeV), charge radii Rch (fm) and neutron Fermi energies λn (MeV) in even-even nickel isotopes from 68Ni to 84Ni, calculated by using SLy5 interaction. Corresponding experimental data are shown in the brackets for comparison [47, 49]
  Eb (MeV) Sn (MeV) Sp (MeV) Rch (fm) λn (MeV)
68Ni 8.71(8.68) 6.99(7.79) 14.47(15.43) 3.91(3.89) -7.09
70Ni 8.64(8.60) 6.11(7.31) 15.76(16.12) 3.93(3.91) -6.24
72Ni 8.56(8.52) 5.45(6.89) 17.04(17.15) 3.95 -5.62
74Ni 8.46(8.43) 4.95(6.66) 18.29(18.02) 3.96 -5.13
76Ni 8.36(8.34) 4.53(6.02) 19.50(18.92) 3.98 -4.70
78Ni 8.26(8.24) 3.29(5.60) 20.69(20.26) 3.99 -2.40
80Ni 8.10(8.09) 1.70(3.15) 21.46 4.01 -1.86
82Ni 7.94(7.94) 1.44(2.70) 22.18 4.03 -1.60
84Ni 7.78 1.11 22.85 4.04 -1.17
Show more

It can be seen that the binding energies per nucleon decrease with increasing mass number, and the calculated values can reproduce the measurements well. The neutron separation energies of 68-82Ni predicted by the Skyrme EDF are somewhat smaller than the experimental data, but the calculated results can reproduce the data tendency with respect to the mass number well. In Table 1, it is shown that the theoretical proton separation energies Sp are in good agreement with the experimental data. We also show the calculated charge radii of even-even 68-84Ni isotopes in the table, which increase with increasing mass number. For the studied nuclei, only two nuclei, 68,70Ni, had experimental charge radii data. These results were well reproduced by the calculations. The calculated neutron Fermi energies are presented in the last column of Table 1, one can see that the neutron Fermi energies are approaching to zero when the nuclei are becoming more and more unstable.

For neutron-rich nickel nuclei, the discretized RPA has been proven to be unreliable, whereas Green’s function technique can properly take into account the contribution from the continuum [40, 41]. Therefore, CQRPA was adopted to explore the PMR in more neutron-rich Ni isotopes in the present study. As mentioned above, the residual interactions in the CQRPA calculations adopt the Migdal form. This means that the interactions used in CQRPA are not the same as those used in the ground-state calculations. We adjusted the residual interactions to ensure that a spurious isoscalar dipole state appeared at zero excitation energy, and the value of the renormalization factor was approximately 0.8.

The CQRPA monopole strength distributions for 70-84Ni are shown in Fig. 1. One can see the monopole strengths for 70-78Ni increased monotonically from the particle threshold to the ISGMR peak at approximately 21 MeV. This implies that a shoulder structure appears in the low-energy region for 70-78Ni. This is consistent with the conclusions of Refs. [40, 41], there is no PMR for 70-78Ni. However, starting from 80Ni, the particle threshold becomes much lower, and an obvious PMR emerges in the energy region between 2.5 and 11 MeV. With the increasing of mass number, the low-energy strength becomes more and more strong.

Fig. 1
(Color online) The CQRPA monopole strength distributions for 70-84Ni predicted by the SLy5 Skyrme interaction
pic

We separated the low-energy PMR from the giant monopole resonance at an excitation energy of E=11 MeV, and calculated the ratios of the low-energy strength to the whole ISGMR strength for the non-energy-weighted sum rule m0, inverse energy-weighted sum rule m-1 and energy-weighted sum rule m1, respectively. As illustrated in Fig. 2(a), the ratios of m0 (orange circles), m-1 (purple squares), and m1 (black stars) of the low-energy strength are almost zero until mass number A=78. From 80Ni, the three ratios increased significantly, and the values became larger in more neutron-rich nuclei. This suggests that the contribution of the PMR below 11 MeV increases with increasing mass number. The centroid energies Ecen (green pentagons) and constrained energies Econ (pink triangles) are plotted as functions of the mass number in Fig. 2(b), which is similar to Fig. 2(a), the values of Ecen and Econ remain constant when the mass number is not greater than 78, whereas the two energies are significantly decreased from 80Ni to 84Ni because of the appearance and enhancement of the low-energy monopole strengths. The values of Ecen are somewhat higher than those of Econ along the Ni isotopic chain, especially for 80-84Ni.

Fig. 2
(Color online) (a) The ratios R of m0, m-1, and m1 for the even-even nickel isotopes from 68Ni to 84Ni. (b) The centroid energies Ecen and constrained energies Econ in 68-84Ni
pic

In this paragraph, quasiparticle excitations in the low-energy region will be carefully investigated because these excitations may contribute significantly to the PMR strengths. The unperturbed and CQRPA monopole strengths of 80-84Ni are shown in Fig. 3(a)-(c). For the giant monopole resonance, the CQRPA strengths are shifted down to a lower energy compared to the distribution of unperturbed strengths because the attractive residual interactions play an important role in isoscalar monopole excitation. The PMR strengths were slightly reduced compared to the unperturbed strengths, but the locations were almost unchanged. It can be seen that the low-energy strengths are highly sensitive to neutron excess. It was found that the low-energy strength below 20 MeV shown in the figures is made of the excitations mainly contributed by neutron states around the Fermi level, including 1g9/2, 2d5/2, 3s1/2, and 2d3/2. The corresponding single-particle energies Es.p., gaps Δ, quasiparticle energies Eq.p. and occupation probabilities v2 are listed in Table 2. We noticed that the single-particle energies of the four neutron states become increasingly bound with an increase in the neutron excess. It is shown that the gaps of the four neutron states are rather stable at approximately 0.6 MeV. The neutron states 2d5/2 are just above or below the Fermi energies; therefore, the quasiparticle energies are relatively small. As for states 1g9/2, 3s1/2 and 2d3/2, they are a little far from the Fermi energies, and their quasiparticle energies are relatively large except for state 3s1/2 in 84Ni, because its single-particle energy is much closer to the Fermi energy. One can see that the occupation probabilities of 1g9/2 are almost 1.0, leading to relatively stable excitations. Other partially occupied orbits (2d5/2, 3s1/2 and 2d3/2) changed their occupation probabilities when the neutron excess was increased. The corresponding unperturbed neutron threshold strengths, contributed by the excitation of neutrons around the Fermi surface to the continuum, are gradually enhanced[see Fig. 3(d)-(f)]: The occupancy probabilities of 2d5/2 are increased much more than the other states with the filling of neutrons, from 0.33 in 80Ni increased to 0.92 in 84Ni. Therefore, the increase in low-energy strengths in 80-84Ni is mainly due to the contribution of a stronger threshold strength of 2d5/2.

Fig. 3
(Color online) Figures (a)-(c): The unperturbed and CQRPA monopole strength distributions for 80-84Ni predicted by the SLy5 Skyrme interaction. Figures (d)-(f): Some unperturbed neutron threshold strengths, which contribute appreciably to the total unperturbed strength below 20 MeV in 80-84Ni, are shown for respective occupied orbits, (1g9/2)-1, (2d5/2)-1, (3s1/2)-1, and (2d3/2)-1
pic
Table 2
The single-particle energies (Es.p. in MeV), gaps (Δ in MeV), quasiparticle energies (Eq.p. in MeV) and occupation probabilities (v2) of neutron states around the Fermi level in 80-84Ni, calculated by using SLy5 Skyrme interaction
  80Ni 82Ni 84Ni
State Es.p. Δ Eq.p. v2 Es.p. Δ Eq.p. v2 Es.p. Δ Eq.p. v2
1g9/2 -5.80 0.73 4.01 0.99 -5.94 0.77 4.41 0.99 -6.08 0.57 4.94 1.00
2d5/2 -1.62 0.67 0.72 0.33 -1.81 0.72 0.75 0.64 -2.01 0.53 0.99 0.92
3s1/2 -0.40 0.4 1.52 0.02 -0.59 0.45 1.11 0.04 -0.78 0.38 0.55 0.14
2d3/2 0.34 0.55 2.28 0.01 0.13 0.61 1.84 0.03 -0.08 0.45 1.18 0.04
Show more
4

Summary and Perspectives

In the present study, we extended the CQRPA approach in Ref. [42] in a more consistent manner, in which the model includes the Skyrme interaction for both ground and excited state calculations. Then, the consistent Skyrme HF+BCS and CQRPA models were applied to explore the emergence, evolution, and origin of low-energy monopole strengths along the even-even Ni isotopes. Shoulder structures at low-energy region for 70-78Ni are found, which are similar to the conclusions in Refs.[40, 41]. However, the situation changed dramatically with the occupation of the weakly bound neutron orbitals. Indeed, starting from 80Ni, pronounced pygmy monopole strengths were clearly identified. The origin of the low-energy monopole strength is attributed to neutron excitations from the weakly bound orbitals into the continuum, including neutron states 1g9/2, 2d5/2, 3s1/2 and 2d3/2. The changes in the ratios of low-energy strengths to total ISGMR strengths for m-1, m0 and m1 as well as the centroid and constrained energies along Ni isotopes, are also discussed, and the changes are more obvious when the mass numbers are larger than 78, which are attributed mainly to the emergence of low-energy strengths. Eventually, the experimental data of PMR in neutron-rich nuclei are obviously inadequate, more efforts from the experimental investigations of PMR shall be made to confirm or disprove the predictions from models in the future.

References
1.N. Paar, D. Vretenar, E. Khan et al.,

Exotic modes of excitation in atomic nuclei far from stability

. Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, R02 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/70/5/R02
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2.D. Savran, T. Aumann, and A. Zilges,

Experimental studies of the Pygmy Dipole Resonance

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 70, 210 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.02.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3.E. Litvinova, H.P. Loens, K. Langanke et al.,

Low-lying dipole response in the relativistic quasiparticle time blocking approximation and its influence on neutron capture cross sections

. Nucl. Phys. A 823, 26 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.03.009
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4.N. Tsoneva, S. Goriely, H. Lenske et al.,

Pygmy resonances and radiative nucleon captures for stellar nucleosynthesis

. Phys. Rev. C 91, 044318 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044318
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5.T. Saito, M. Matsuo,

Continuum random-phase approximation for (n,γ) reactions on neutron-rich nuclei: Collective effects and resonances

. Phys. Rev. C 107, 064607 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.064607
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6.B.S. Cai, C. X. Yuan,

Random forest-based prediction of decay modes and half-lives of superheavy nuclei

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 204 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01354-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7.P. Jiao, Z.R. Hao, Q.K. Sun et al.,

Measurements of 27Al(γ, n) reaction using quasi-monoenergetic γ beams from 13.2 to 21.7 MeV at SLEGS

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 66 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01662-y
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8.A. Klimkiewicz, N. Paar, P. Adrich et al.,

Nuclear symmetry energy and neutron skins derived from pygmy dipole resonances

. Phys. Rev. C 76, 051603(R) (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.051603
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9.A. Carbone, G. Colò, A. Bracco et al.,

Constraints on the symmetry energy and neutron skins from pygmy resonances in 68Ni and 132Sn

. Phys. Rev. C 81, 041301(R) (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.041301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10.V. Baran, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro et al.,

Connecting the pygmy dipole resonance to the neutron skin

. Phys. Rev. C 88, 044610 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044610
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11.L. Liu, Y.W. Lu, S. Sun et al.,

Constraining symmetry energy from pygmy dipole resonances in 68Ni and 132Sn

. Chin. Phys. C 49, 024101 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ad9016
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12.L.G. Cao and Z. Y. Ma,

Symmetry Energy and Isovector Giant Dipole Resonance in Finite Nuclei

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 25, 1625 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/25/5/028
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13.M.Q. Ding, D.Q. Fang, Y.G. Ma,

Neutron skin and its effects in heavy-ion collisions

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 211 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01584-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14.R. An, S. Sun, L.G. Cao et al.,

New quantification of symmetry energy from neutron skin thicknesses of 48Ca and 208Pb

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 182 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01551-w
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15.P. Adrich, A. Klimkiewicz, M. Fallot et al.,

Evidence for Pygmy and Giant Dipole Resonances in 130Sn and 132Sn

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 132501 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.132501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16.J. Gibelin, D. Beaume, T. Motobayashi et al.,

Decay Pattern of Pygmy States Observed in Neutron-Rich 26Ne

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 212503 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.212503
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17.O. Wieland, A. Bracco, F. Camera et al.,

Search for the Pygmy Dipole Resonance in 68Ni at 600 MeV/nucleon

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 092502 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.092502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18.T. Inakura, T. Nakatsukasa, and K. Yabana,

Emergence of pygmy dipole resonances: Magic numbers and neutron skins

. Phys. Rev. C 84, 021302(R) (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.021302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19.K. Wang, M. Kortelainen, and J. C. Pei,

Probing surface quantum flows in deformed pygmy dipole modes

. Phys. Rev. C 96, 031301(R) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.031301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20.D. Gambacurta, M. Grasso, and O. Vasseur,

Electric dipole strength and dipole polarizability in 48Ca within a fully self-consistent second random-phase approximation

. Phys. Lett. B 777, 163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12.026
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21.E.G. Lanza, L. Pellegri, A. Vitturi et al.,

Theoretical studies of Pygmy Resonances

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 129, 104006 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.104006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22.D. Yang, L.G. Cao, Y. Tian et al.,

Importance of self-consistency in relativistic continuum random-phase approximation calculations

. Phys. Rev. C 82, 054305 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.054305
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23.L.G. Cao and Z. Y. Ma,

Soft dipole modes in neutron-rich Ni-isotopes in QRRPA

. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 2845 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732304015233
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24.S. Sun, R.Q. Yu, L.G. Cao et al.,

Application of relativistic continuum random phase approximation to giant dipole resonance of 208Pb and 132Sn

. Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 61 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01288-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25.D. Vretenar, N. Paar, P. Ring et al.,

Pygmy dipole resonances in the relativistic random phase approximation

. Phys. Rev. C 63, 047301 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.047301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26.H. Lv, S.S. Zhang, Z.H. Zhang et al.,

Pygmy and giant dipole resonances in proton-rich nuclei 17,18Ne

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 34, 082101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/34/8/082101
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27.K. Yoshida and N. V. Giai,

Low-lying dipole resonance in neutron-rich Ne isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 78, 014305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.014305
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28.M. Martini, S. Péru, M. Dupuis,

Low-energy dipole excitations in neon isotopes and N=16 isotones within the quasiparticle random-phase approximation and the Gogny force

. Phys. Rev. C 83, 034309 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034309
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29.J.C. Pei, M. Kortelainen, Y.N. Zhang et al.,

Emergent soft monopole modes in weakly bound deformed nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 90, 051304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.051304
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30.F. Mercier, J.-P. Ebran, E. Khan,

Low-energy monopole strength in spherical and axially deformed nuclei: Cluster and soft modes

. Phys. Rev. C 105, 034343 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.034343
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31.J. Piekarewicz,

Emergence of low-energy monopole strength in the neutron-rich calcium isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 96, 044314 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044314
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32.D. Gambacurta, M. Grasso, O. Sorlin,

Soft breathing modes in neutron-rich nuclei with the subtracted second random-phase approximation

. Phys. Rev. C 100, 014317 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014317
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33.E. Khan, N. Paar and D. Vretenar,

Low-energy monopole strength in exotic nickel isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 84, 051301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.051301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34.X. Sun,

Evolution of soft monopole mode in the even-even nickel isotopes 58-68Ni

. Phys. Rev. C 103, 044603 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044603
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35.E. Khan, N. Paar, D. Vretenar, et al.,

Incompressibility of finite fermionic systems: Stable and exotic atomic nuclei

. Phys. Rev. C 87, 064311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.064311
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36.H.Z. Liang, T. Nakatsukasa, Z.M. Niu et al.,

Feasibility of the finite-amplitude method in covariant density functional theory

. Phys. Rev. C 87, 054310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.054310
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37.Z.Z. Li, Y. F. Niu and G. Colò,

Toward a unified description of isoscalar giant monopole resonances in a self-consistent quasiparticle-vibration coupling approach

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 082501 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.082501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
38.M. Vandebrouck, J. Gibelin, E. Khan et al.,

Measurement of the isoscalar monopole response in the neutron-rich nucleus 68Ni

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032504 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.032504
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
39.M. Vandebrouck, J. Gibelin, E. Khan et al.,

Isoscalar response of 68Ni to α-particle and deuteron probes

. Phys. Rev. C 92, 024316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.024316
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
40.I. Hamamoto, H. Sagawa,

Self-consistent Hartree-Fock and RPA Green’s function method indicate no pygmy resonance in the monopole response of neutron-rich Ni isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 90, 031302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.031302
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
41.J. Piekarewicz,

Nuclear breathing mode in neutron-rich nickel isotopes: Sensitivity to the symmetry energy and the role of the continuum

. Phys. Rev. C 91, 014303 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.014303
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
42.K. Hagino, H. Sagawa,

Continuum QRPA in the coordinate space representation

. Nucl. Phys. A 695, 82 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01122-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
43.M. Bender, P. H. Heenen, and P. G. Reinhard,

Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
44.G. Colò, L.G. Cao, N.V. Giai, et al.,

Self-consistent RPA calculations with Skyrme-type interactions: The skyrme-rpa program

. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 142 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.07.016
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
45.E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel et al.,

A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities Part II. Nuclei far from stabilities

. Nucl. Phys. A 635, 231 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00180-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
46.S.A. Changizi, C. Qi, R. Wyss,

Empirical pairing gaps, shell effects, and di-neutron spatial correlation in neutron-rich nuclei

. Nucl. Phys. A 940, 210 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.04.010
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
47.M. Wang, W.J. Huang, F. G. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi,

The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

. Chin. Phys. C 45, 030003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
48.K.F. Liu, H.D. Luo, Z.Y. Ma et al.,

Skyrme-Landau parameterization of effective interactions: (II). Self-consistent description of giant multipole resonances

. Nucl. Phys. A 534, 25 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(91)90556-L
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
49.S. Malbrunot-Ettenauer, S. Kaufmann, S. Bacca et al.,

Nuclear charge radii of the nickel isotopes 58-68,70Ni

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 022502 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.022502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
50.P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980).
51.L.G. Cao, H. Sagawa, G. Colò,

Microscopic study of the isoscalar giant monopole resonance in Cd, Sn, and Pb isotopes

. Phys. Rev. C 86, 054313 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.054313
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
52.S. Sun, S.S. Zhang, Z.H. Zhang et al.,

Effect of pairing correlation on low-lying quadrupole states in Sn isotopes

. Chin. Phys. C 45, 094101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ac0b39
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
Footnote

Feng-Shou Zhang is an editorial board member for Nuclear Science and Techniques and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.