logo

Formulae for secondary electron yield from insulators and semiconductors

LOW ENERGY ACCELERATOR, RAY AND APPLICATIONS

Formulae for secondary electron yield from insulators and semiconductors

Ai-Gen Xie
Min Lai
Yu-Lin Chen
Yu-Qing Xia
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.28, No.10Article number 141Published in print 01 Oct 2017Available online 06 Sep 2017
37600

The processes and characteristics of secondary electron emission in insulators and semiconductors were studied, and the formulae for the maximum yield (δm) at Wp0m≤800eV and the secondary electron yield from insulators and semiconductors δ at the primary incident energy of 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV (δ2-10) and 10 keV≤Wp0≤100 keV (δ10-100) were deduced. The calculation results were compared with their corresponding experimental data. It is concluded that the deduced formulae can be used to calculate δ2-100 at Wp0m≤800eV.

Maximum secondary electron yieldInsulators and semiconductorsSecondary electron yield.

1 Introduction

Secondary electron yields from different materials have interested many authors [1-4]. The secondary electron yield from insulators and semiconductors (δ) has found increasing applications in various areas, such as information technology, accelerator, scanning electron microscope, space flight etc. [5-7] However, due to the high resistance of insulators and semiconductors, it is difficult to overcome their surface charge problem and measure the secondary electron yield[8-10]. Thus, available δ measurement data on insulators and semiconductors are not rich [11], especially in the incident energy range of 10–100 keV. Instead, many authors deduced formulae for key parameters to deduce δ of insulators and semiconductors[12-16]; But up to now, no formulae is available for the incident energy range of 2–10 keV (δ2-10) and 10–100 keV (δ10-100), and for Wp0m, the incident energy at which δ is maximized (δm).

In this study, based on secondary electron emission processes in insulators and semiconductors and the formulae of δ2-10, δ10-100, and the maximum yield δm at Wp0m≤800 eV were deduced, involving the primary range of 10 keV≤Wp0≤100 keV (R10-100) and 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV (R2-10), the atomic number Z, and the high energy back-scattering coefficient r, apart from the different forms of secondary electron yield. For compounds, Z represents average atomic number of compounds, for example, Z = (20+8)/2 for CaO; and r represents back-scattering coefficient in the energy range of Wp0≥10 keV.

2 Methods

2.1 Formula for δm

When electrons enter an insulator or semiconductor, secondary electrons are generated due to energy deposition of the primary electrons. Suppose that N(x,Wp) is the number of secondary electrons produced at a depth x and primary electron energy of Wp, N(x,Wp) is proportional to average loss of primary electrons per unit path length [17,18]:

N(x,Wp)=dWpdS1ε, (1)

where Wp is primary energy at given depth in insulator or semiconductor, S is the path length of primary electrons, and ε is the average energy required to produce an internal secondary electron in an insulator or semiconductor.

The probability of an internal secondary electron reaching the surface of the insulator or semiconductor and passing over the surface barrier into vacuum can be written as [17,18]:

f(x)=Bexp(αx), (2)

where α is the absorption coefficient (and 1/α is mean escape depth of secondary electrons), and B is the probability that an internal secondary electron escapes into vacuum upon reaching the surface of insulator or semiconductor.

From Eqs. (1) and (2), the yield due to primary electron can be written as[19]:

δp=0RN(x,Wp)Bexp(αx)dx=Bε0RdWpdSexp(αx)dx, (3)

According to Seiler [17], the maximum yield due to primary electron δpm is at R = 2.3/α. Then, δpm can be written as [19]:

δpm=Bε02.3αdWpdSexp(αx)dx. (4)

At Wp0m≤800 eV, the primary range R can be expressed as [20]

R= 2×109AαWp0m/(ρZ2/3), (5)

where ρ is material density, Z is atomic number and Aα is atomic weight.

It can be assumed that the R at Wp0m≤800 eV approximately equals the corresponding S for deducing the formula for δm. Thus, the energy loss per unit path length of the primary electrons at Wp0m≤800 eV can be obtained by differentiating Eq.(5)

dWp/dS= ρZ2/3/(2×109Aα). (6)

The δpm at Wp0m≤800 eV can be obtained by combining Eqs. (4) and (6)

δpm= (e2.31)BρZ2/3/(2×109Aααe2.3ε). (7)

Relation between δm and δpm can be written as [21]:

δm= (1+1.26r)δpm. (8)

For a given material, r is a constant [22]. The δm can be obtained by combining Eqs. (7) and (8).

δm= (1+1.26r)(e2.31)BρZ2/3/(2×109Aααe2.3ε) (9)
2.2 Formula for δ10-100

When primary electrons of 10 keV≤Wp0≤100 keV enter an insulator or semiconductor, R10-100 can be expressed as [20]

R10100=3.02×1011AαWp05/3ρZ8/9. (10)

It can be assumed that the R10-100 approximately equals the corresponding S for deducing the formula for δ10-100. Thus, the following expression can be obtained by differentiating Eq.(10)

dWpdS=ρZ8/95.03×1011AαWp2/3. (11)

The R10-100 is much larger than the maximum escape depth of secondary electrons T. For example, using Eq.(10) in Si (Z=14, ρ = 2.35g/cm3,and Aα=28.1) [13] at Wp0=10 keV, we have R10=16055Å and T = 41–54Å[23]. Thus, most of the primary energy is dissipated outside T, and the primary energy changes little inside T. Then, the energy loss of primary electrons in the energy range of 10 keV≤Wp0≤100 keV per unit path length inside T can be approximately written as

dWpdS=ρZ8/95.03×1011AαWp02/3. (12)

The δp in energy range of 10 keV≤Wp0≤100 keV can be obtained by combining Eqs. (3) and (12)

δp=BερZ8/95.03×1011AαWp02/30Rexp(αx)dx. (13)

The R10-100 is much larger than T. The internal secondary electrons excited outside T cannot be emitted into vacuum [23], and T approximately equals 5/α [23]. Thus, the definite integral [0,R] of Eq.(13) can be replaced with [0,5/α]. Then, we have:

δ=(e51)e5BαερZ8/95.03×1011AαWp02/3. (14)

The δ is composed of δp and yield due to backscattered electrons δr, i.e. [24]

δ=δp+ηδr=(1+βη)δp. (15)

where β is the ratio of the mean secondary electron generation of one backscattered electron to that of one primary electron, and η is the back-scattering coefficient at Wp0. The β is greater than one[17], because the larger average emission angle of backscattered electrons is more favorable for the excitation of secondary electrons than the normal incidence of primary electrons, and the mean energy of backscattered electrons is less than Wp0.

According to theoretical and experimental results, for 10 keV≤Wp0≤100 keV, β of metals is about 2 (β10-100metal≈2) [25-28]. Because the average emission angle and mean energy of backscattered electrons from insulator or semiconductor are similar to those from metals[28-29], we assume β10-100insulator ≈2 for 10 keV≤Wp0≤100 keV. Therefore, we have:

δ10-100= (1+2r)δp. (16)

The δ in energy range of 10 keV≤Wp0≤100 keV and Wp0m≤800 eV can be obtained by combining Eqs. (9), (14) and (16)

δ10100=43.9(1+2r)Z2/9δm(1.1.26r)Wp02/3. (17)
2.3 Formula for δ2-10

When primary electrons of 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV enter an insulator or semiconductor, R2-10 can be expressed as [20]

R210=1.03×1010AαWp03/2ρZ5/6. (18)

It can be assumed that the R2-10 approximately equals the corresponding S during for deducing the formula for δ2-10. Thus, we have Eq.(19)

dWpdS=ρZ5/61.545×1010AαWp1/2. (19)

The R2-10 is much larger than T in energy range of Wp0m<800 eV. For example, for Si (Z =14, ρ= 2.35g/cm3, Aα=28.1) [13], at Wp0=2000 eV, calculated with Eq. (18) we have R2=1222 Å and T =41–54Å[23]. Thus, most of the primary energy is dissipated outside T, the primary energy only has a little change inside T. Then, the energy loss of primary electrons in the energy range of 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV per unit path length inside T can be approximately written as:

dWpdS=ρZ5/61.545×1010AαWp01/2. (20)

Based on Eqs. (3) and (20), δp in energy range of 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV can be written as

δp=BερZ5/61.545×1010AαWp01/20Rexp(αx)dx. (21)

R2-10 is much larger than T in energy range of Wp0m<800 eV, the internal secondary electrons excited outside T cannot be emitted into vacuum[23], and T ≈5/α[23]. Thus, the definite integral [0, R] of Eq.(21) can be replaced with [0, 5/α], i.e.,

δp=(e51)e5BαερZ5/61.545×1010AαWp01/2. (22)

From Eqs. (8) and (15), we have δp/δr= 1/(1.26r) for Wp0m≤800 eV, and from Eqs. (15) and (16), we have δp/δr = 1/(2r) for 10 keV≤Wp0≤100 keV. There is the tendency that η increases with Wp0 for Wp0≤10 keV [17], so there is the tendency that the δp/δr decreases with Wp0 for Wp0≤10 keV. Thus, the δp/δr ratio for 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV is in the range of [1/(1.26r),1/(2r)], and we assume δp/δr =1/(1.5r) for 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV. Then, approximately, the δ for 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV can be expressed as:

δ=(1+1.5r)δp. (23)

Combining Eqs. (22) and (23), we have:

δp=(e51)e5BαερZ5/6(1+1.5r)1.545×1010AαWp01/2. (24)

From Eqs. (9) and (24), the δ for 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV and Wp0m≤800 eV can be expressed as

δ210=14.29(1+1.5r)Z1/6δm(1+1.26r)Wp01/2. (25)

3 Results and discussion

Several approximations were made in deducing Eqs. (17) and (25). For example, for 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV, energy loss of primary electron per unit path length inside T is from approximation. The energy loss decreases with Wp[4,30]. The R2-10 is much larger than T for Wp0m<800 eV. Thus, most of the primary energy is dissipated outside T, the primary energy changes little inside T. Therefore, the energy loss of primary electron can be calculated Eq.(20)..

The δ10-100 and δ2-10 calculated with Eqs. (17) and (25), respectively, and the δm[31-32], Z, Wpo and r are given in Table. 1. It can be seen that the calculation results of δ10-100 and δ2-10 agree well with the experimental data [31-32]. So, Eq. (17) can be used to calculate δ10-100, and the assumption that β10-100insulator ≈ 2 is reasonable. Also, for 2 keV≤Wp0<10 keV, Eq. (25) can be used to calculate δ2-10 and the assumption that the ratio of δp /δr ≈1/(1.5r) is reasonable.

Table. 1
Comparison of the calculated δ for insulators and semiconductors with the experimental data
Materials[17,21]  δm  Wpo(keV) Calculated Measured
Si (Z =14, r =0.22) 1.594[31]  3.0[31]  0.6723 0.769[31] 
    5.0[31]  0.5207 0.49[31] 
    10[31]  0.3056 0.3431[31] 
    20[31]  0.1925 0.216[31] 
    30[31]  0.1439 0.138[31] 
Te (Z =52, r =0.41) 1.63[31]  3.0[31]  0.875 0.891[31] 
    5.0[31]  0.6777 0.706[31] 
    10[31]  0.4451 0.376[31] 
    20[31]  0.2804 0.319[31] 
    30[31]  0.214 0.174[31] 
  0.819[11]  2.0[11]  0.5384 0.495[11] 
    2.4[11]  0.4915 0.418[11] 
Ge (Z =32, r =0.35) 1.142[33]  2.0[33]  0.688 0.696[33] 
    2.5[33]  0.6154 0.54[33] 
    3.0[33]  0.5618 0.53[33] 
    3.5[33]  0.52 0.49[33] 
    4.0[33]  0.4865 0.45[33] 
    4.5[33]  0.4587 0.42[33] 
    5.0[33]  0.4352 0.42[33] 
  0.743[11]  2.0[11]  0.4477 0.398[11] 
    3.0[11]  0.3655 0.312[11] 
    4.0[11]  0.3165 0.264[11] 
  1.62[31]  5.0[31]  0.6174 0.649[31] 
    20.0[31]  0.2458 0.228[31] 
C (Z =6, r =0.1) 1.56[31]  5.0[31]  0.434 0.501[31] 
    20[31]  0.1475 0.125[31] 
  1.136[33]  2.0[34]  0.5 0.527[34] 
    2.5[34]  0.447 0.442[34] 
    3.0[34]  0.408 0.4[34] 
    4.0[34]  0.3533 0.316[34] 
    5.0[34]  0.316 0.315[34] 
Indium tin oxide (Z =35.7, r =0.36) 2.52[32]  2.0[32]  1.5477 1.55[31] 
    3.0[32]  1.2637 1.31[32] 
    5.0[32]  0.9789 1.03[32] 
    7.0[32]  0.8273 0.72[32] 
    10[32]  0.6356 0.73[32] 
Indium zinc oxide (Z =29, r =0.34) 2.67[32]  2.0[32]  1.581 1.61[32] 
    3.0[32]  1.291 1.31[32] 
    5.0[32]  1.0 1.02[32] 
    7.0[32]  0.845 0.86[32] 
    10[32]  0.6278 0.72[32] 
Al2O3 (Z =10, r =0.18) 6.23[35]  2.0[35]  3.025 3.83[35] 
    3.0[35]  2.47 2.44[35] 
V2O5 (Z =12.3, r =0.2) 1.216[36]  2.01[36]  0.6114 0.718[36] 
    2.54[36]  0.5439 0.669[36] 
    3.044[36]  0.4968 0.578[36] 
    3.572[36]  0.4586 0.53[36] 
    4.034[36]  0.4316 0.487[36] 
    5.056[36]  0.3855 0.389[36] 
    5.571[36]  0.367 0.347[36] 
Show more

The secondary electrons inside an insulator or semiconductor lose their energy in electron-electron collisions. Classically, only electrons with a kinetic energy E>χreal can escape into vacuum [37], where χreal is the real electron affinity and E is the energy measured from the bottom of conduction band of insulator and semiconductor. The minimum energy (for secondary electrons to escape) increases with the χreal. The electrons that are created in shallower depths suffer fewer collisions and survive with sufficient energy to escape. In other words, volume in the insulator or semiconductor from which electrons escape decreases with increasing χreal, and from this reduced volume only hot electrons emerge. As a result, a decrease in 1/α is expected. With the increase of χreal, the minimum energy for secondary electrons to escape increases, and B decreases. Therefore, from Eq. (9), δm increases with decreasing χreal.

For an insulator or semiconductor, different sample preparation techniques can lead to different χreal, hence different δm, and different δ2-10 and δ10-100, from Eqs. (17) and (25). These can be seen clearly for Te and Ge shown in Table 1 From above, it is concluded that the formulae for δ10-100 and δ2-10 can be used to calculate δ2-100 in the energy range of Wp0m≤800 eV.

4 Conclusion

Based on the processes and characteristics of secondary electron emission, formulae for R10-100 and R2-10 and relationships among parameters of δ, the formulae for δ10-100 and δ2-10 were deduced, respectively. The δ10-100 calculated with the deduced formula for δ10-100 and δ2-10 calculated with the deduced formula for δ2-10 were compared with their corresponding experimental data, and the results were analyzed. It is concluded that the deduced formulae for δ10-100 and δ2-10 can be used to calculate δ2-100 in the energy range of Wp0m≤800 eV.

Different sample preparation of an insulator or semiconductor can lead to different χreal, 1/α, B, δm, δ2-10 and δ10-100.

References
[1] J. Wang, Y. Wang, Y.H. Xu, et al.,

Research on the secondary electron yield of TiZrV-Pd thin film coatings

. Vacuum 131, 81-88(2016).doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.05.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] A.G. Xie, L. Wang, L.H. Mu, 2015,

Formula for maximum secondary electron yield from metals

. Surf. Rev. Lett. 22,1550019(2015). doi: 10.1142/S0218625X15500195
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] A.G. Xie, M. Lai, Y.L. Chen, et al.,

Formulae for secondary electron yield and the ratio of the average number of secondary electrons generated by a single backscattered electron to that generated by a single primary electron

. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 53, 298-301(2015)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] A.G. Xie, S.R. Xiao, L. Wang,

Formulae for the secondary electron yield and total stopping power from 0.8 keV to 10 keV for metals

. Pramana. J. Phys. 86, 1127-1141(2016). doi: 10.1007/s12043-015-1119-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] S. Michizono,

Secondary electron emission from alumina RF windows

. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul 14, 583-592(2007). Doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2007.369517
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] B.P. Song, W.W. Shen, H.B. Mu, et al.,

Measurements of secondary electron emission from dielectric window materials

. IEEE Trans. Plasm. Sci. 41, 2117-2122(2013). doi: 10.1109/TPS.2013.2265498
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] R. Hoffmann, J.R. Dennison,

Measurement methods of electron emission over a full range of sample charging

. IEEE Trans. Plasm. Sci 40, 298-304(2012). doi: 10.1109/TPS.2011.2178251
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] Y. Chen, J. Wu, M. Cho et al.,

Total electron emission yields of typical polymers

. IEEE International Conference on Solid Dielectrics [C]. Bologna: Italy, 4, 752-755 (2013). doi: 10.1109/ICSD.2013.6619757
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] K. Said, G. Damamme, A. Siahmed et al.,

Dependence of secondary electron emission on surface charging in sapphire and polycrystalline alumina: Evaluation of the effective cross sections for recombination and trapping

. Appl. Surf. Sci. 297,45-51(2014). doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.01.070
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] A. Chvyreva, A.J.M. Pemen,

Experimental investigation of electron emission from dielectric surfaces due to primary electron beam: a review

. IEEE Trans. Dielect. Electr. Insula. 21, 2274-2282(2014). doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2014.004487
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] http://www.mc-set.com.
[12] A.G. Xie, Q.F. Li, Y.Y. Chen, et al.,

The formulae for parameters of the secondary electron yield of insulators from 10 keV to 30 keV

. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 27, 1350238-1350248(2013). doi: 10.1142/S0217984913502382
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] A.G. Xie, S.R. Xiao, H. Y. Wu,

Mean escape depth of secondary electrons emitted from semiconductors and insulators

. Indian J. Phys. 87, 1093-1097(2013). doi: 10.1007/s12648-013-0355-8
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] A.G. Xie, Y. Zhan, Z.Y. Gao, et al.,

Formula for average energy required to produce a secondary electron in insulator

. Chin. Phys. B 22, 057901-057903(2013). doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/22/5/057901
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] A.G. Xie, S.R. Xiao,Y. Zhan, et al.,

Formula for the probability of secondary electrons passing over the surface barrier into vacuum

. Chin. Phys. Lett. 29, 117901-117904(2012). doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/29/11/117901
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] R.C. Alig,

Secondary-electron-escape probabilities

. J. Appl. Phys. 49, 3476-3480(1978)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] H. Seiler,

Secondary electron emission in the scanning electron microscope

. J. Appl.Phys. 54, R1-R18(1983). doi: 10.1063/1.332840
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] A.G. Xie, H.Y. Wu, J. Xu,

Parameters of the secondary electron yield from metal

. J. Korean. Phys. Soc. 62, 725-730(2013). doi: 10.3938/jkps.62.725
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] A.G. Xie, Z.H. Liu,Y. Q. Xia, et al.,

Maximum secondary electron yield from semiconductors and insulators

. Surf. Rev. Lett 24,1750045 (2017). doi: 10.1142/S0218625X17500457
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] K. Kanaya, H. Kawakatsu,

Secondary electron emission due to primary and backscattered electrons

. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 5, 1727-1742 (1972). doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/5/9/330
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] S. Ono, K. Kanaya,

The energy dependence of secondary emission based on the range-energy retardation power formula

. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 12, 619-632(1979). doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/12/4/019
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] W Reuter, Proceedings of the 6th International Conf. on X-ray Optics and Microanalysis (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1972), p. 121.
[23] H. Seiler,

Some problems of secondary electron emission

. Z.Angew.Phys 22, 249-263(1967)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] L. Reimer, H. Drescher,

Secondary electron emission of 10-100 keV electrons from transparent films of Al and Au

. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 10, 805-815(1977). doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/10/5/022
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] H. Drescher, L. Reimer, H. Seidel,

Rückstreukoeffizient und Sekundärelektronen-Ausbeute von 10-100 keV-Elektronen und Beziehungen zur Raster-Elektronenmikroskopie

. Z. Angewl. Phys. 29, 331-336(1970)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[26] I.M. Bronshtein, S.S. Denisov,

Secondary electron emission of Aluminum and nickel obliquely incident primary electrons

. Sov. Phys. Solid State 9, 731-732(1967)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[27] A.G. Xie, H.F. Zhao, T.B. Wang,

Ratio of the mean secondary electron generation of backscattered electrons to primary electrons at high electron energy

. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 268, 687-689(2010). doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.12.026
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[28] A.G. Xie, C.Y. Zhang, K. Zhon,

Two contributions to the ratio of the mean secondary electron generation of backscattered electrons to primary electrons at high electron energy

. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 28, 1450046(2014). doi: 10.1142/S0217984914500468
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[29] L. Reimer. Scanning electron microscopy: physics of image formation and microanalysis [M]. Springer-Verlag, 1985. p. 135.
[30] http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/appendix.html
[31] L. Reimer, C. Tolkamp,

Measuring the backscattering coefficient and secondary electron yield inside a scanning electron microscope

. Scanning 3, 35-39(1980). doi: 10.1002/sca.4950030105
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[32] D.M. Suszcynsky, J.E. Borovsky, C.K. Goertz,

Secondary-electron yields of solar-system ices

. J. Geophysical Res. 97, 2611-2619(1992). doi: 10.1029/91JE02944
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[33] J.B. Johnson, K.G. McKay,

Secondary Electron Emission from Germanium

. Phys. Rev. 93, 668-672 (1954). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.93.668
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[34] R. Böngeler, U. Golla, M. Kässens, et al.,

Electron-specimen interactions in low-voltage scanning electron microscopy

. Scanning 15,1-18(1993). doi: 10.1002/sca.4950150102
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[35] P. H. Dawson,

Secondary Electron Emission Yields of some Ceramics

. J. Appl. Phys. 37, 3644-3645(1966).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[36] E.A. Flinn,

Enhanced secondary electron emission yield from doped vanadate-phosphate glasses

. J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3441-3443(1980). doi: 10.1063/1.326320
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[37] A. van der Ziel, Solid State Physical Electronics, 2nd ed (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall) p 172 (1968).