logo

Analysis and optimization of high-power pulse transformer for SXFEL

SYNCHROTRON RADIATION TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS

Analysis and optimization of high-power pulse transformer for SXFEL

Yong-Fang Liu
Hiroshi Matsumoto
Ming Gu
Xiao-Xuan Zhou
Yong-Hua Wu
Zhi-Hao Chen
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.30, No.7Article number 109Published in print 01 Jul 2019Available online 05 Jun 2019
45000

A C-band accelerator structure was used to accelerate electrons at the Shanghai Soft X-ray Free-Electron Laser Test Facility (SXFEL-TF) in Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics (SINAP). The microwave system of this accelerator structure used a 110 MW pulse modulator and a klystron (PV-5050) to provide the power supply. A pulse transformer is a crucial device in a modulator klystron system, and plays significant roles in voltage level transformation, matching impedances, and polarity inversion. This study presents the optimization of a high-voltage pulse transformer. The design considerations of reducing flattop ringing and flattop droop, and shortening leading edge are provided. The model simulation, mechanical design, and the relevant experimental results are also presented.

Pulse transformerPulse modulatorFlattop droopLeading edgeFlattop ringing.

1 Introduction

An X-ray free-electron laser is regarded as a 4th generation light source [1-4], with the characteristics of high intensity, exceptional brightness, ultrashort pulse duration, and spatial coherence [5-7]. The Shanghai Soft X-ray Free-Electron Laser Test Facility (SXFEL-TF) requires seven sets of C-band klystrons to provide microwaves with high power [8-9]. The main specifications of the pulse modulator power supply are a pulse current of 320 A, pulse voltage of 350 kV, flattop width of 3 µs, and repetition rate of 10 Hz [10]. To satisfy the modulator requirements, a durable and dependable high-power pulse transformer with exquisite workmanship is indispensable. The values of design parameters of a C-band pulse transformer are listed in Table 1.

Table 1:
Values of design parameters of a C-band pulse transformer
Primary side Secondary side
Items Value Items Value
Pulse voltage (kV) 22 Pulse voltage (kV) 350
Pulse current (A) 5100 Pulse current (A) 320
Leading edge (μs) 0.5 Leading edge (μs) 0.9
Falling edge (μs) 0.5 Falling edge (μs) 1.2
Flat-top (μs) 5.5 Flattop (μs) 3
FWHM (μs) 6 Flattop ripple (%) 0.25
Repeat rate (Hz) 10 Hz Flattop droop (%) 2
Show more

The detailed schematic circuit of the modulator with the pulse transformer is shown in Fig. 1. In this study, the performance parameters of high-voltage pulse transformers in other facilities are investigated [11-13], and a detailed equivalent circuit model of a high-voltage pulse transformer is presented. Based on the analyses of the equivalent circuit model, an optimized design method is also presented. Furthermore, experimentally measured data and waveforms are provided.

Figure 1
Detailed circuit of pulse transformer application
pic

2 Pulse transformer modeling

2.1 Equivalent circuit of pulse transformer

In a linear modulator, a pulse transformer is designed as a step-up transformer used for transmitting pulsed power. We apply a typical equivalent circuit, as presented in Fig. 2, to analyze a pulse transformer.

Figure 2
Equivalent circuit of a typical pulse transformer
pic

Term K denotes the coupling coefficient of the pulse transformer (K=1 in the ideal case), Cd1 denotes the distributed capacitance of the primary winding line, and  Cd2 denotes the distributed capacitance of the secondary winding line. Term Cw is the parasitic capacitance between the primary and secondary windings, Lp indicates the primary inductance, Ls indicates the secondary inductance, and RL indicates the load impedance. Term N denotes the step-up ratio of the pulse transformer, Ct denotes the parasitic capacitance between the primary winding and ground, and Lt denotes the lead inductance in series with Ct. Table 2 shows a comparison of the main parameters of the C-band pulse transformers in other facilities [14-20].

Table 2.
Main parameters of C-band pulse transformers in other facilities
ITEM TOSHIBA SACLA PAL
Primary inductance (µH) 200 560 600
Leakage inductance (µH) 3 3 2.8
Load capacitance (nF) -- 30 --
Pulse width (µs) 5 5 10
Flattop droop (%) 5.2 1.9 3.1
Show more
2.2 Shorten leading edge

In general, we can neglect unrelated parameters, such as Lp, Lt, and Ct when analyzing the leading edge [21]. In this case, the equivalent circuit for leading edge analysis is shown in Fig. 3. In a line-type modulator, the pulse forming network (PFN) impedance is usually designed to be equal to the load impedance. The leading edge can be calculated using Eq. (1). This depends on the distributed capacitance and leakage inductance [22].

Figure 3
Equivalent circuit for leading edge analysis
pic
Tr=2πy(σ)LeCd, (1)

where Le indicates the leakage inductance, Cd indicates the distributed capacitance, RL indicates the load impedance, σ=ZT2RL, and ZT=LeCd. Term y(σ) depends on the selected damping coefficient σ, and can be obtained from Table 3.

Table 3:
Relationship between y(σ) and σ
σ y(σ)
0.5 0.299
0.6 0.303
0.7 0.311
0.8 0.329
0.9 0.347
1.0 0.374
1.1 0.404
1.2 0.431
Show more

Fig. 4 shows the leading edge for a certain range of σvalues. As can be derived from the theories, for a specified value of distributed capacitance, a larger leakage inductance leads to a slower leading edge, and for a certain value of leakage inductance, a small distributed capacitance leads to a smaller overshoot. For instance, in the case of Cd = 20 nF and Le = 2 µH, overshoot is approximately 2% compared with the case of Cd = 30 nF and Le = 2 µH. The leading edge increases by approximately 200 ns for Cd = 30 nF and Le = 3 µH compared with the case of Cd = 30 nF and Le = 2 µH.

Figure 4
Leading edge with different values of damping factor σ
pic

We use Eq. (2) to calculate the leakage inductance. We can also measure it using a precision LCR meter [23].

Le=μ02CLdNP2Lc, (2)

where μ0 is the permeability of free space (4π×10-7 H/m), CL indicates the one-turn mean length of the primary coil, d indicates the distance between the primary and secondary windings, Lc indicates the height of the secondary coil, and Np indicates the number of primary winding turns.

We can apply corresponding methods to decrease the leakage inductance—for instance, using closed core, cone-shape windings, and close bifilar winding. The calculated and measured values of leakage inductance of this pulse transformer are 2.25 and 2.3 µH, respectively.

The distributed capacitance includes a stray capacitance between the primary and secondary windings and a stray capacitance in the klystron. The distributed capacitance between the primary and secondary windings can be calculated using Eq.(3). We can also measure the total distributed capacitance using a precision LCR meter.

Cd=23ε0εrCLLcd(n1)2, (3)

where ε0 is the dielectric constant of vacuum. εr is the relative dielectric constant, CL is the one-turn length of the primary winding, Lc is the secondary coil height, n is the transformer ratio, and d is the distance between the primary and secondary windings. The distributed capacitance between the primary and secondary windings is calculated to be 12 nF and the total distributed capacitance is measured to be 40 nF.

2.3 Flattop droop and primary inductance

Flattop droop depends on the inductance of the primary winding. The equivalent circuit used for flattop droop analysis is shown in Fig. 5

Figure 5
Equivalent circuit for flattop droop analysis
pic

We use Eq. (4) to calculate the voltage across the resistance RL.

U"L=LpdiLdt, (4)

where Lp is the primary inductance, and iL is the current flowing through Lp.

Equation (5) can be derived from the principle of Kirchhoff laws.

E=U"L+(iL+U"LRL)RPFN, (5)

where E is the voltage of the pulser, and RPFN is the PFN characteristic impedance.

The initial conditions (t=0) are given by Eq.(6).

UL(t=0)=RLERL+RPFN (6)

Based on Equations (4), (5), and (6), the voltage U'L can be calculated as follows:

U'L=αEetTd, (7)

where α=RLRL+RPFN is called the transmission factor from the primary to secondary windings of the pulse transformer, and Td=Lp(RL+RPFN)RLRPFN is called the time constant of the pulse transformer.

The flattop droop D is defined in Eq. (8).

D=1etTd (8)

In a linear modulator, we usually design the PFN output impedance to be matched to the load impedance. The flattop droop D is determined by the primary inductance, where the relationship between primary inductance and flattop droop is given in Eq. (9).

Lp=tRLRPFN(RL+RPFN)ln(11D)tRLRPFN(RL+RPFN)D (9)

Fig. 6 shows the primary inductance versus flattop droop for the C-band klystron pulse transformer. Fig. 7 presents a graphical view of flattop droop with different values of primary inductance in the simulation of the C-band pulse transformer. As shown in Fig. 7, a primary inductance of 100 µH results in approximately 10.8% flattop droop, a primary inductance of 300 µH results in approximately 3.6% flattop droop, and a primary inductance of 500 µH only results in approximately 2.2% flattop droop.

Figure 6
Primary inductance vs. flattop droop
pic
Figure 7
Simulation result of flattop droop with different values of primary inductance
pic

The primary inductance is associated with the core material permeability, winding turns, core size, and magnet flux pass length [24]. It can be calculated using Eq.(10).

Lp=u0×ur×NP2×Acorelm, (10)

where μ0 is the permeability of free space (4π×10-7H/m), ur is the permeability of the core material, lm is the average magnetic pass length. Acore is the core cross-section area.   Np is the number of primary winding turns.

In general, core materials with high permeability are preferred. High permeability ensures the fewest turns to attain our desired magnetizing inductance [25]. Fewer turns lead to lower leakage inductance, smaller distributed capacitance, and smaller winding resistance. Silicon steel and ferrite are the most commonly used materials for the design of a high-power pulse transformer core. In our design, the primary inductance is 226 µH. Thus, we can calculate the flattop droop as 5%.

2.4 Reduce flattop ringing

Flattop ringing is determined by the parasitic capacitance between the primarily coil and ground Ct and the lead inductance Lt in series with Ct. Fig. 8 shows the circuit used to analyze the flattop ringing. Fig. 9 shows the flattop ringing with different values of Lt and Ct. The ringing frequency can be calculated using Eq. (11).

Figure 8:
Equivalent circuit for analyzing flattop ringing
pic
Figure 9:
Flattop ringing with different values of Lt and Ct
pic
F[Hz]=12πLtCt  (11)

In summary, the main parameters of the C-band high-power pulse transformer are listed in Table 4.

Table 4
Main parameters of the C-band high-power pulse transformer
Items Value
Primary inductance (µH) 226
Secondary inductance (mH) 58.50
Leakage inductance (µH) 2.3
Primary impedance (mΩ) 3.9
Secondary impedance (mΩ) 1031
Load capacitance (nF) 40
Parasitic capacitance between the core and secondary coil (pF) 136
Parasitic capacitance between the primary and secondary coils (pF) 140
Show more

3 Mechanical design

Using parameter analysis, we optimize and fabricate the pulse transformer. Fig. 10 shows the geometrical structure of the pulse transformer. The transformer is designed to have two secondary windings. To reduce the distributed coupling parameters and reduce the risk of flashover, the insulation distances between primary coil and secondary coil are increased between the input and output points. The transformer core shape is almost rectangular, apart from the corners, which are rounded. The cores are made of silicon steel sheet with high permeability. The primary winding is composed of two coils in parallel, each having six turns. The secondary winding of the transformer consists of 96 turns.

Figure 10:
Geometrical structure of the pulse transformer
pic

4 Test results and discussion

The pulse transformer is installed in a metallic tank filled with condenser oil, which is used as a coolant and insulator. Fig. 11 shows a picture of the klystron and oil tank with the pulse transformer inside. After the system was installed, an experimental test was performed. Fig. 12 presents the typical measured waveforms with a klystron load: one illustrates the pulse current obtained using a precise pulsed current sensor (0.1 V/A), and the other illustrates the pulse voltage measured using a high voltage divider (9300:1). Table 5 summarizes the test parameters of the typical measured waveforms of the C-band high-power pulse transformer.

Table 5
Test parameters of the pulse transformer waveform
Items Value Items Value
Pulse voltage (kV) 350 Pulse current (A) 317
Leading edge (ns) 746 Falling edge (µs) 1.3
Flattop (µs) 3.1 FWHM (µs) 5.6
Show more
Figure 11
Klystron and pulse transformer oil tank
pic
Figure 12:
Output waveforms
pic

Based on our model analysis in this study, Le=2.3 µH, Cd=40 nF, ZT=LeCd=7.58, and RL=380KV368A×162=4.03 Ω.  Thus, σ=ZT2RL=0.95, and y(σ)=0.36. We can calculate the leading edge as Tr=686 ns using Eq. (1). The experimentally obtained leading edge is 746 ns as shown in Fig. 13. The increase in the measured value over the theoretical expected value is due to the increased distributed capacitance after installation in the oil tank.

Figure 13:
Measurement result of leading edge
pic

Our work aims to elaborate the analysis of a pulse transformer by using a circuit model. Using this circuit model, we can determine the relationship between the distribution parameters of the pulse transformer and the output pulse shape. The analysis of the circuit model shows how to obtain a shorter leading edge, smaller flattop ringing, and smaller flattop droop. The results can be used to guide mechanical design to obtain appropriate circuit parameters.

5 Conclusion

A pulse transformer as a primary device in a high-gradient accelerating structure has been studied in the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics. A detailed equivalent circuit modeling a high-power pulse transformer was presented, especially for shortening the leading edge and reducing the flattop ringing and droop. Subsequently, its validity was confirmed using LTspice code and through experiment using the SXFEL high-power microwave system. The results obtained from the experiments and theoretical analysis were compared. Based on the circuit analysis, we optimized our mechanical design. It was indicated by relevant test results that this C-band high-power pulse transformer satisfied the requirements of a practical target. The circuit models and analysis methodology can be applied in the research and development of future high-power pulse transformers.

References
[1] M. Altarelli.

From 3rd to 4th generation light sources: free electron lasers in the X-ray range

. J. Crystallogr. Rep. 55, 1145-1151(2010). doi: 10.1134/S1063774510070072
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[2] C. Feng, H.X. Deng.

Review of fully coherent free-electron lasers

. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 2018, 29(11): 160. DOI: 10.1007/s41365-018-0490-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[3] Z.T. Zhao, C. Feng, K.Q. Zhang.

Two-stage EEHG for coherent hard X-ray generation based on a superconducting linac

. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 2017, 28, 117. Doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0258-z
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[4] T. Phimsen, B.C. Jiang, H.T. Hou et al.

Improving Touschek lifetime and synchrotron frequency spread by passive harmonic cavity in the storage ring of SSRF

. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 2017, 28(8): 108. DOI: 10.1007/s41365-017-0259-y
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[5] Z. Zhao, D. Wang, Q. Gu, et al.

Status of the SXFEL facility

. Appli. Sci. 7, 2017, doi: 10.3390
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[6] Z. Wang, C. Feng, Q. Gu et al.

Generation of double pulses at the Shanghai soft X-ray free electron laser facility

. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 2017, 28: 28. DOI: 10.1007/s41365-017-0188-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[7] C.H. Miao, M. Liu, C.X. Yin et al.

Precise magnetic field control of the scanning magnets for the APTRON beam delivery system

. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 2017, 28: 172. DOI: 10.1007/s41365-017-0324-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[8] Z. T. Zhao, D. Wang, L. X. Yin, et al,

The Current Status of the SXFEL Project

, AAPPS Bulletin 26(2016)
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[9] W. Fang, Q. Gu, Z. Zhao, et al,

R&D of new c-band accelerating structure for SXFEL facility

. Paper presented at the 4th international particle accelerator conference, Shanghai, 12 to 17 May, 2013
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[10] C. Wang, W. Fang, D. Chun,

Design and study of a C-band pulse compressor for the SXFEL linac

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 25, 020101(2014). doi: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.25.020101
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[11] Z. Zhang, X. Tan,

Review of high power pulse transformer design

. J. Physcs. Proc. 32, 566-574(2012). doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.602
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[12] S. Candolfi, P. Viarouge, D. Aguglia, et al,

Hybrid design optimization of high voltage pulse transformers for klystron modulators

. J. IEEE. T. Dielect. El. In. 22, 3617-3624(2016). doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2015.005047
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[13] S. Blume, M. Jaritz, J. Biela.

Design and Optimization procedure for high voltage pulse power transformers

. IEEE. T. Plasma. Sci. 43:3385-3391(2015). doi: 10.1109/TPS.2015.2448351
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[14] A. Baktash, A. Vahedi.

Design of a wound core pulse transformer using multiobjective optimization method

. IEEE. T. Plasma. Sci. 43:857-863(2015). doi: 10.1109/TPS.2015.2394478
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[15] Z. Zhang, H. Yang, J. Yang, et al,

Compact megavolt pulse transformer with inner magnetic core and conical secondary windings

. 2015 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Austin, doi: 10.1109/PPC.2015.7296978
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[16] D. Bortis, G. Ortiz, J.W. Kolar,

Design procedure for compact pulse transformers with rectangular pulse shape and fast rise times

. J. IEEE. T. Dielect. El. In. 18, 1171-1180(2011). doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2011.5976112
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[17] Y. Wang, M. Li, K. Li, et al,

Optimal design and experimental study of pulse transformers with fast rise time and large pulse duration

. IEEE. T. Plasma. Sci. 42, 300-306(2014). doi: 10.1109/TPS.2013.2295280
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[18] S. Candolfi, S. Blume, D. Aguglia, et al,

Evaluation of insulation systems for the optimal design of high voltage pulse transformers

. 2014 IEEE International Power Modulator and High Voltage Conference, Santa Fe, New Mexico. doi: 10.1109/IPMHVC.2014.7287336
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[19] F. Pan, L. Jin, P. Pan, et al,

Design procedure of the leakage inductance for a pulse transformer considering winding structures

. J. IEEE. T. Plasma. Sci. 45, 2504-2510(2017).doi: 10.1109/TPS.2017.2732163
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[20] J. S. Oh, M. H. Cho, W. Namkung, et al.

Rise time analysis of pulsed klystron-modulator for efficiency improvement of linear colliders

. J. Nuclear Inst & Methods in Physics Research A. 443:223-230(2000). doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(99)01171-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[21] W. Zhao, X. Q. Guo, W. Chen, et al.

Temporal characteristic analysis of single event effects in pulse width modulator

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 92(2017). doi: 10.1007/s41365-017-0254-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[22] B. Yang, L. Cao, J. Yang, et al.

Equivalent circuit model for the insulated core transformer

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 27, 68 (2016). doi: 10.1007/s41365-016-0060-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[23] J.J. Tian. Y. H. Liu, R. Li, et al.

Magnetic flux leakage analysis and compensation of high-frequency planar insulated core transformer

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 26, 030105(2015). doi: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.26.030105
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[24] Z. Benesova, V. Kotlan,

New approach to surge phenomena analysis in transformer winding

, in 2014 IEEE International Power Modulator and High Voltage Conference, Santa Fe, New Mexico. doi: 10.1109/ipmhvc.2014.7287259
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
[25] D. Habibinia, M. Feyzi,

Optimal winding design of a pulse transformer considering parasitic capacitance effect to reach best rise time and overshoot

. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 21, 1350-1359 (2014). doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2014.6832283
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar