logo

Carbon-based nanomaterials cause toxicity by oxidative stress to the liver and brain in Sprague-Dawley rats

NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE

Carbon-based nanomaterials cause toxicity by oxidative stress to the liver and brain in Sprague-Dawley rats

Ying-Ying Xu
Chan Jin
Meng Wu
Jian-Ye Zhou
Hui-Ling Wei
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.35, No.6Article number 109Published in print Jun 2024Available online 04 Jul 2024
48100

Carbon-based nanomaterials have important research significance in various disciplines, such as composite materials, nanoelectronic devices, biosensors, biological imaging, and drug delivery. Recently, the human and ecological risks associated with carbon-based nanomaterials have received increasing attention. However, the biosafety of carbon-based nanomaterials has not been investigated extensively. In this study, we used different types of carbon materials, namely, graphene oxide (GO), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), as models to observe their distribution and oxidative damage in vivo. The results of Histopathological and ultrastructural examinations indicated that the liver and lungs were the main accumulation targets of these nanomaterials. SR-μ-XRF analysis revealed that SWCNTs and MWCNTs might be present in the brain. This shows that the three types of carbon-based nanomaterials could cross the gas–blood barrier and eventually reach the liver tissue. In addition, SWCNTs and MWCNTs could cross the blood–brain barrier and accumulate in the cerebral cortex. The increase in ROS and MDA levels and the decrease in GSH, SOD, and CAT levels indicated that the three types of nanomaterials might cause oxidative stress in the liver. This suggests that direct instillation of these carbon-based nanomaterials into rats could induce ROS generation. In addition, iron (Fe) contaminants in these nanomaterials were a definite source of free radicals. However, these nanomaterials did not cause obvious damage to the rat brain tissue. The deposition of selenoprotein in the rat brain was found to be related to oxidative stress and Fe deficiency. This information may support the development of secure and reasonable applications of the studied carbon-based nanomaterials.

Carbon-based nanomaterialsOxidative stressTrace element distributionTEMSR-μ-XRF
1

Introduction

Nanotechnology has revolutionized everything from production to health. Currently, carbon-based nanomaterials have emerged as a global research hotspot [1-3]. Ideal carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are a new type of nanomaterial that usually use a multilayer composite structure from a single layer to more than 100 layers. CNTs with one graphene layer and those with more than one layer are called single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), respectively. Owing to their excellent aspect ratios and electrical, mechanical, and physicochemical properties, they have been applied in various research fields, such as composite materials [4, 5], nanoelectronic devices [6], biological sensors [7], biological imaging [8, 9], and biomedicine [10, 11]. In addition, carbon-based nanomaterials can be used as a new type of transport for a variety of peptides, proteins, plasmid DNAs, and SiRNA in the biomedical field [12, 13]. CNTs have demonstrated good modifiability, which has good application prospects in diagnosis, invisibility, targeting, and drug loading. Interestingly, it is worth mentioning that in 2013, the worldwide production of MWCNTs and SWCNTs was approximately 2000 tons and 6 tons, respectively [14], which would be is expected to exceed 20,000 tons (SWCNTs and MWCNTs combined) in 2022. The increasing popularity and production of CNTs will inevitably lead to contact between the environment and human body. Thus, the toxicity of carbon-based nanoparticles is a notable challenge requiring further investigation.

Although the toxicological mechanism of carbon-based nanomaterials remains unclear, oxidative stress is considered to be one of the main causes of their toxicological effects [15-17]. It is characterized by excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) caused by a redox state imbalance [18]. Previous studies have demonstrated that carbon-based nanomaterials cause significant damage to the liver, kidneys, and brain, which are sensitive to oxidative stress [19-22]. In addition, the instillation of carbon-based nanoparticles in rats could result in lung injury, accompanied by obvious inflammatory and fibrotic features, which might be due to the accumulation of black foreign substances in the lungs. Wang et al. [23] demonstrated that SWCNTs accumulated in small doses in vascular endothelial cells and in the bone, stomach, and kidney for a long time in animals. Furthermore, it had been reported that MWCNTs could cross most of the biological barriers after tail vein administration, including the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [24, 25]. However, owing to the various exposure routes, there is no significant difference in the distribution of carbon-based nanomaterials in the body [23], which is closely related to their transport capacity in the body [26]. In addition, several neurotoxicological mechanisms have been associated with cell homeostasis and trace elements [27-30], as well as free radical production [31]. The interaction between nanomaterials and trace elements, particularly selenium (Se), which is known as an antioxidant, has an antagonistic effect on nanomaterials [32]. Synchrotron micro-X-ray fluorescence (μ-XRF) with a high spatial resolution is an excellent technique for elemental spatial distribution [33, 34]. However, the mechanism underlying spatial distribution and cross-cellular transport of carbon-based nanomaterials in vivo remains unclear, especially regarding the cytotoxicity caused by the oxidative stress of carbon-based nanoparticles in vivo.

In light of the above, in this study, Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats intratracheally instilled with different concentrations of graphene oxide (GO), SWCNTs, and MWCNTs were used as models to confirm the toxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials including oxidative stress and its distribution. Its location in the tumor tissue was determined by histopathological, ultrastructural, and SR-μ-XRF examinations. We then focused on the oxidative stress and antioxidant status in the liver and brain. Furthermore, the major trace element spatial distribution of calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), and Se in the rat brain was evaluated. These data support the development of secure and reasonable applications.

2

Materials and Methods

2.1
The properties of carbon-based nanomaterials

GO was prepared using the improved Hummer method [35, 36], and SWCNTs and MWCNTs were synthesized using catalytic chemical vapor deposition technology [37]. All the carbon-based nanomaterials were obtained from the Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The characterization results are summarized in Table 1. After UV irradiation for 2 h, the carbon-based nanomaterials were suspended in normal saline to obtain concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 μg/mL. The suspension was ultrasonicated for 20 min, with a break every 10 min before use. The morphology and structure of the samples were observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Hitachi-7650).

Table 1
The characterization of carbon-based nanomaterials
  SWCNTs MWCNTs GO
Diameter (nm) 2 10–20 <500
Purity > 90 wt.% carbon > 95wt.% carbon -
  <10 wt.% Fe <5 wt.% Fe -
Length (μM) 5–15 5–15 -
Show more
2.2
Animals and treatment

Sixty normal male SD rats were purchased from the Experimental Animal Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and fed in two animal cages under a 12 h light/dark cycle. The cultural environment was as follows: the temperature was 23 ℃ to 26 ℃, and the relative humidity was 50% to 60%. A supply of pure water and sterilized food was available.

The SD rats were randomly divided into 10 groups (n = 6).

(1) Normal group (G1): The members of this group received normal saline.

(2) GO-treated group (G2): Members of this group received GO (50, 100, and 200 μg/mL).

(3) SWCNT-treated group (G3): The members of this group received SWCNTs (50, 100, and 200 μg/mL).

(4) MWCNT-treated group (G4): The members of this group received MWCNTs (50, 100, and 200 μg/mL).

A suspension of 1.0 mL was instilled into the trachea of the rats using chloraldehyde hydrate as the anesthetic. The rats returned to their normal health within 30 days and were then euthanized. The lungs, liver, and brain were immediately collected and protected according to the determination requirements. All operations were performed in accordance with the standards of the China-Japan Friendship Hospital and strictly in accordance with the principle of relieving pain in rats.

2.3
Pathological and EM examination

The lung and liver tissues of the rats were removed, washed with an aqueous phosphoric acid solution, and fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin (Shanghai Guoyao Chemical Company, China) for 2 days. The phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) washing method was used to dry in the presence of a certain amount of alcohol and wrapped in paraffin, and 5 microns were stained with hematoxylin–eosin (H&E). Finally, pathological changes in the lungs and liver were observed under a microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany).

2.4
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

The liver blocks were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Shanghai National Pharmaceutical and Chemical Company) for 4 h, washed with PBS thrice, and treated with 1% cerium oxide for 1 h. Then, according to standard practice, the liver samples were washed with PBS, dried in a certain proportion, and embedded in epoxy resin. An ultramictotome (UC6, Leica), used to cut the samples, was mounted on copper grids, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and observed using TEM (TEM, Hitachi-7650).

2.5
Evaluation of oxidative stress and antioxidant status in rat liver and brain tissues

Rat liver and brain tissues were homogenized in 50 mM Tris-10 mM EDTA buffer (pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 13000×g at 4 ℃ for 30 min. Indices of oxidative stress and antioxidant status, namely, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and ROS, were measured. The activities of SOD and CAT were measured using SOD (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) and CAT assay kits (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), respectively. The products of lipid peroxidation was analyzed using an MDA assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). GSH levels were measured using the manufacturer’s protocols specified in the GSH assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). LDH leakage, used to measure membrane damage, was determined using a commercial LDH kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Jiangsu). Finally, ROS levels were determined using ROS reagent kits (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, China). All the testing procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A minimum of three trials were conducted each time.

2.6
Synchrotron radiation-induced micro X-ray fluorescence analysis (SR μ-XRF) analyses

The distributions of Ca, Fe, and Se in the brain sections were studied using μ-XRF at BL15U1 at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) [27, 38]. In the storage ring, the energy of the electron beam was approximately 3.5 GeV, and the beam current was approximately 200 mA. During the experiment, the sample slice was placed on a sample holder in which the stepper motor driven by the microcomputer moved in both X- and Y-directions. The distributions of Ca, Fe, and Se in the brain slices were continuously observed at steps of 30 μm in both X- and Y-directions. Ten parallel scans on the brain samples were detected at a resolution of 30 μm × 30 μm from the edge to center, with an area of approximately 5.5 mm × 8.0 mm. The emission energy was 16.5 keV, and the collection speed was 1.0 s/step. Elemental fluorescence intensities were normalized to the ionization chamber signals, which were collected simultaneously. The X-ray spectra were analyzed using IGORPRO6.10 (Waveguide Materials Co., Ltd.).

2.7
Statistical Analysis

All data were calculated as the mean ±standard deviation. One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test were used to compare the groups. A significant difference was detected between the two groups (P > 0.05).

3

Results

3.1
Carbon-based nanomaterial characterization

The morphology and structure of the carbon-based nanocrystals were determined using TEM, as shown in Fig. 1. The GO particle size was approximately 400 nm, and clusters were easily formed. As shown in Figs. 1b and 1c, the SWCNT and MWCNT samples were easily entangled and difficult to separate using ultrasonic vibration. This result is consistent with previous reports [39, 40].

Fig. 1
Microphotograph of carbon-based nanomaterials. (a) GO; (b) SWCNTs; (c) MWCNTs
pic
3.2
Pulmonary inflammatory cell infiltration

The alveolar volume was normal, and there was no obvious pulmonary artery dilatation after normal saline treatment (Fig. 2a). Compared with the normal group (G1), more black foreign bodies appeared in the lungs of rats treated with carbon-based nanomaterials (G2, G3, and G4), as shown in Figs. 2b–d. Meanwhile, a large amount of inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the lung tissue. A few black foreign bodies are observed in the alveolar ducts of the G2 group, as shown in Fig. 2b. They are characterized by irregular sizes and sunken alveoli. However, significant black foreign bodies were still observed in the bronchi of patients in the G3 and G4 groups, as shown in Figs. 2c and 2d. In the alveolar cavity, there were neutrophils and some thickening in the alveolar cavity. These results show that carbon-based nanomaterials can induce inflammatory lung injury.

Fig. 2
(Color online) The histopathological changes in rat lung (HE staining, magnification × 100, Scale bar = 100 μm). (a) G1 group; (b) G2 group (100 μg/mL); (c) G3 group (100 μg/mL); (d): G4 group (100 μg/mL); The green, red, blue and black arrows indicate inflammatory cell infiltration, epithelial cell necrosis, hyperemia, and carbon-based materials, respectively
pic
3.3
Hepatic inflammatory cell infiltration

The histopathological images showed an abnormal structure in the liver tissues of rats after exposure to carbon-based nanomaterials as shown in Figs. 3a–d. Compared with the G1 group, irregular arrangements of liver tissue, changes in vacuoles in the cytoplasm, and congestion and exudation of the portal vein in the liver tissue were observed after SWCNT and MWCNT exposure. Exudation of inflammatory cells was observed in the lesion, accompanied by local calcification. However, no significant changes were observed in the G2 group. In addition, the liver tissue was observed using TEM as shown in Figs. 4a–d. After carbon-based nanomaterial exposure, we observed pathological changes such as nuclear pyknosis, mitochondrial swelling, and the loss of mitochondrial spines in the liver tissue of rats. Further studies revealed large numbers of small black substances in the mitochondrial cavity of rats in the G2 group, while a large number of clusters of SWCNTs appeared in the mitochondrial cavity of the G3 group, which also showed that there was considerable blackness in the rat mitochondria in the G4 group. The results indicated that in blood circulation, carbon-based nanoparticles with different morphologies could be transported from the lungs to the liver tissue.

Fig. 3
(Color online) The histopathological changes in liver tissues of rats (HE staining, magnification × 200, Scale bar = 50 μm). (a) GI group; (b) G2 group (100 μg/mL); (c) G3 group (100 μg/mL); (d) G4 group (100 μg/mL); The green, yellow, and blue arrows indicate hepatocytes, sinusoid capillary, and centrilobular veinule. The black boxes illustrate many hepatocytes arranged in the form of blades
pic
Fig. 4
(Color online) The ultrastructure changes in liver tissues of rats. (a) GI group; (b) G2 group (100 μg/mL); (c) G3 group (100 μg/mL); (d) G4 group (100 μg/mL); The yellow arrows indicate black materials
pic

Although the liver histopathological examination revealed inflammatory damage and the presence of carbon-based materials, more oxidative stress is needed to confirm this conclusion. The oxidative stress levels in the livers of rats treated with carbon-based nanomaterials are shown in Figs. 5a–f. ROS acted as a key factor for the stability of the biological environment. However, this process is highly fragile owing to the external stress. The results showed that ROS levels increased significantly after treatment with carbon-based nanomaterials and were related to the increase in their concentration. Compared with the GI group, MDA levels were increased in the G2, G3, and G4 groups, and MDA was assessed to be a lipid substance that could affect oxidative stress. In addition, the SOD and CAT, as the activity of antioxidant enzyme, decreased after carbon-based nanomaterial exposure. The results also showed that the degree of exposure and oxidation of the carbon-based nanomaterials were concentration-dependent. Compared with the GI group, the GSH level after carbon-based nanomaterials exposure displayed a reduction tendency, which exhibited the same trend as SOD and CAT. Furthermore, the results showed decreased generation of LDH in the G2, G3, and G4 groups compared with that in the GI group. These studies showed that carbon-based nanomaterials can cause inflammatory damage and oxidative stress in rat liver tissues. In our carbon-based nanomaterial samples, a large number of Fe ions entered the samples during the synthesis process and were difficult to remove completely.

Fig. 5
(Color online) Effects of carbon-based nanomaterials on LDH, SOD, MDA, GSH, ROS, and CAT in rat livers. Values are means ±SD from at least three independent experiments (n = 5). *p > 0.03, compared with the control group
pic
3.4
Neural inflammatory cell infiltration

To gain a deeper understanding of whether carbon-based nanomaterials caused damage to brain tissue through the blood system, the oxidative stress response and the spatial distribution of trace elements in the rat brain were determined using various methods. After exposure to carbon-based nanomaterials, the oxidative pressure response in the rat brain was measured, as shown in Figs. 6a–f. The results showed that MDA and ROS levels were slightly increased, and LDH, SOD, GSH, and CAT levels were decreased. In this study, we found that different concentrations of carbon-based nanomaterials exerted some effect on oxidative damage to a certain extent; however, the degree of the effect was lower than that in normal rats.

Fig. 6
(Color online) Effects of carbon-based nanomaterials on LDH, SOD, MDA, GSH, ROS, and CAT in rat brain. Values are means ±SD from at least three independent experiments (n = 5). *p < 0.03, compared with the normal group
pic

The spatial distributions of Ca, Fe, and Se trace elements in the rat brain after carbon-based nanomaterial treatment were detected using SR μ-XRF as shown in Figs. 7, 8, 9. The shapes and structures of these elemental images correspond very well with those of the brain sections. The spatial distribution of Ca in the brain sections of all three groups was similar, as shown in Figs. 7a–d, which was mostly rich in the cortex and slightly rich in other brain regions. No calcification was observed in the rat brain after carbon-based nanomaterial exposure. The Fe element was most rich in the cortex of brain sections in the control group, as shown in Fig. 8a. However, the Fe content decreased significantly in the brain sections after carbon-based nanomaterial treatment, as shown in Figs. 8b–d. Spots with high concentrations of Fe were observed in the groups exposed to SWCNTs and MWCNTs (Figs. 8c and d). The samples of SWCNTs and MWCNTs contained <10wt.% Fe catalyst and <5wt.% Fe catalyst, respectively. Therefore, the high concentration of Fe spots in the cortex may be due to SWCNTs and MWCNTs. Interestingly, the Se content increased significantly in the brain sections compared with the GI group, as shown in Fig. 9. Meanwhile, a larger amount of granular Se precipitation was observed in the brain sections after carbon-based nanomaterial treatment (Figs. 9b–d). In our results, oxidative stress in the rat brain after the carbon-based nanomaterial treatment might be caused by the entry of the trace element Fe and the precipitation of selenoprotein.

Fig. 7
(Color online) The SR-XRF images of Ca distribution in the brain section. (a) GI group; (b) G2 group (100 μg/mL); (c) G3 group (100 μg/mL); (d) G 4 group (100 μg/mL)
pic
Fig. 8
(Color online) The SR-XRF images of Fe distribution in the brain section. (a) GI group; (b) G2 group (100 μg/mL); (c) G3 group (100 μg/mL); (d) G4 group (100 μg/mL)
pic
Fig. 9
(Color online) The SR-XRF images of Se distribution in the brain section. (a) GI group; (b) G2 group (100 μg/mL); (c) G3 group (100 μg/mL); (d) G4 group (100 μg/mL)
pic
4

Discussion

Carbon-based nanoparticles have important research value in integrated systems for tumor diagnosis and treatment because of their unique physical and chemical properties [41, 42]. In recent years, carbon-based nanoparticles have shown certain toxicological effects on the human body and environment [43, 44]. However, there is no clear conclusion regarding the safety of carbon-based drug therapies [45, 46]. Prior studies have shown that high concentrations of SWCNTs and MWCNTs can cause an inflammatory response in the lung tissue, leading to lung tissue injury[47, 48]. Thus, with nanosafety considerations, three different types of carbon-based nanomaterials, namely, GO, SWCNTs, and MWCNTs, were used as research objects. Our group conducted an in vivo animal experiment in SD rats to confirm the enrichment and oxidative damage of the above carbon-based nanoparticles in the rat lung, liver, and brain tissues.

Studies have found that the liver, kidney, lungs, and other organs may be important targets for the enrichment of CNTs, and their metabolites can be excreted through urine [49, 50]. Wang et al. [23] found that SWCNTs were present in vascular endothelial cells and in the bone, stomach, kidney, and other tissues. Warheit [51] and Lam [52] also studied lung injury induced by the respiratory tract injection of unpurified SWCNTs. In this study, the histopathological and TEM results were sufficient to observe the presence of carbon-based nanomaterials in the lungs and liver. The results showed that the substance was enriched in the lungs and could induce an inflammatory response after pulmonary infection. In addition, small amounts of black foreign body materials were found in the rat liver, indicating that carbon-based nanomaterials in different forms can cross the gas–blood barrier and eventually reach the liver tissue (Fig. 10). Carbon-based nanomaterials can be transported with the blood from the lungs to the liver, which plays a key role in the removal of foreign substances. These results are consistent with the previous results[25, 53]. Compared with the liver tissue, there is a tight BBB in the brain tissue, which is an important barrier to prevent various soluble particulates from entering the brain tissue[54, 55]. The SR-μ-XRF results indicated that SWCNTs and MWCNTs may cross the BBB and accumulate in the cortex of the rat brain. This means that SWCNTs and MWCNTs can cross the BBB and enter the systemic circulation, which is consistent with previous results [24, 56]. In a study by Wang et al. [24], MWCNTs broke through most biological barriers, such as the BBB, after caudal vein administration. CNT distribution in the human body differs significantly for various exposure routes [23]. It has been speculated that their transport in the human body mainly depends on the activity of the blood and macrophages [26]. At the same time, inflammatory cell infiltration, nuclear pyknosis, mitochondrial swelling, and mitochondrial cristae loss were observed in rat liver tissues, and these changes were related to oxidative stress.

Fig. 10
(Color online) The schematic illustration of the possible pathway of the carbon-based nanomaterials in vivo
pic

Oxidative stress is a key factor in mediating inflammatory cell responses [57]. ROS, as a by-product of energy consumption, played a key role in maintaining homeostasis in the body [58]. These steady states are easily disrupted by external environmental stresses. In our study, ROS levels were increased in the liver and brain. This indicates that the direct instillation of carbon-based nanomaterials into rats could induce ROS generation. In addition, the samples of SWCNTs and MWCNTs in this study contained less than 10 wt.% Fe catalyst and 5 wt.% Fe catalyst, respectively. Studies have shown that transition elements, as the main source of free radicals, have significant toxicological effects on micron particles in ultramicron particles [59]. High levels of ROS can cause serious damage to fat, proteins, DNA, and other tissues in the human body, resulting in heart diseases, neuropathy, and other diseases [15]. The experimental results showed that carbon-based nanomaterials reduced LDH levels and increased MDA levels in the liver and brain. This can damage the biological function of the cell membrane resulting from oxidative damage. GSH is an ubiquitous sulfhydryl-containing molecule in the cells affected by ROS [60]. Some cells may be damaged by the decrease in GSH levels in the liver after carbon-based nanomaterial exposure. In our study, the extra ROS may have induced a large amount of inflammatory cell infiltration in the rat liver tissue and increased mitochondrial volume and mitochondrial vertebral loss. Meanwhile, the ROS could also be quickly eliminated by ROS-scavenging enzymes such as SOD and CAT. SOD converts superoxide anions into hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen, and catalase can decomposes these anions into molecular oxygen and water [61, 62]. The activities of SOD and CAT decreased markedly in the presence of carbon-based nanoparticles. Therefore, the extra ROS could be scavenged through antioxidants to maintain the balance of ROS level in the body. In contrast, some researchers [63-65] discussed the safety of the substance and insisted that CNTs were harmless to the human body. In our study, MDA and ROS levels increased slightly in the rat brain after exposure, and the activities of GSH, CAT, and SOD decreased slightly, which was closely related to oxidative stress. Se is well known for its antioxidative capacity; most selenoprotein was in the brain and was mainly distributed in the olfactory bulb, cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum [32]. Ingold et al. [66] reported that selenocysteine containing GPX4 protects neurons from oxidative stress and ferroptosis. In this study, we found that the deposition of selenoprotein in the rat brain is related to oxidative stress and Fe deficiency.

5

Conclusion

Carbon-based nanomaterials play a critical role in composite nanoelectronic devices, biosensors, biological imaging, and drug delivery. Recently, carbon-based nanomaterials had certain human and ecological risks, and thus, their application in medical treatment is still controversial. In this study, we intended to use different types of carbon-based nanomaterials (GO, SWCNTs, and MWCNTs) as models to observe their distribution and oxidative damage in vivo. Our histopathological and ultrastructural studies indicated that the liver and lungs were the primary accumulation targets of these nanomaterials. The SR-μ-XRF analysis showed that SWCNTs and MWCNTs may also be present in the brain. This shows that the three different types of carbon nanoparticles could pass through the gas–blood barrier and eventually reach the liver tissue. Additionally, SWCNT and MWCNT can cross the BBB and accumulate in the cerebral cortex. The three types of carbon-based nanomaterials may cause oxidative stress in the liver with an increase in ROS and MDA levels along with a decrease in GSH, SOD, and CAT levels. This suggests that direct instillation of these carbon-based nanomaterials into rats could induce ROS generation. In addition, Fe contaminants in carbon-based nanomaterials are a source of free radicals. However, carbon-based nanoparticles did not cause any discernible damage to the brain tissue of mice, which was similar to the damage to the brain tissue of rats. It has also been shown that the deposition of selenoprotein in the rat brain is related to oxidative stress and Fe deficiency.

References
1. A.M. Dimiev, A. Khannanov, I. Vakhitovet al.,

Revisiting the Mechanism of Oxidative Unzipping of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes to Graphene Nanoribbons

. ACS Nano 12, 3985-3993 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b01617
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. Z. Chen, R. Wu, Y. Liuet al.,

Ultrafine Co Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Carbon-Nanotubes-Grafted Graphene Sheets as Advanced Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

. Adv. Mater. 30, 1802011 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201802011
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. R. Fang, K. Chen, L. Yinet al.,

The Regulating Role of Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene in Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

. Adv. Mater. 31, 1800863 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800863
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. Y. Qiao, C.M. Li, S.J. Baoet al.,

Carbon nanotube/polyaniline composite as anode material for microbial fuel cells

. J. Power Sources 170, 79-84 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.048
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. A.K. Ian, S. Jonghwan, L. Junet al.,

Composites with carbon nanotubes and graphene: An outlook

. Science 362, 547-553 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7439
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. V. Sgobba, D.M. Guldi,

Carbon nanotubes–electronic/electrochemical properties and application for nanoelectronics and photonics

. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 165-184 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/b802652c
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. Y. Li, Q. Wei, F. Maet al.,

Surface-enhanced Raman nanoparticles for tumor theranostics applications

. Acta. Pharm. Sin. B 8, 349-359 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.03.007
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. Y. Yang, J. Zhang, J. Zhuanget al.,

Synthesis of nitrogen-doped carbon nanostructures from polyurethane sponge for bioimaging and catalysis

. Nanoscale 7, 12284-12290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr03481g
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. J. Zhao, J. Chen, S. Maet al.,

Recent developments in multimodality fluorescence imaging probes

. Acta. Pharm. Sin. B 8, 320-338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.03.010
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. J. Liu, C. Wang, X. Wanget al.,

Mesoporous Silica Coated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as a Multifunctional Light-Responsive Platform for Cancer Combination Therapy

. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 384-392 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201403079
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. B. Newland, C. Taplan, D. Petteet al.,

Soft and flexible poly(ethylene glycol) nanotubes for local drug delivery

. Nanoscale 10, 8413-8421 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr00603b
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. D. Lombardo, M. A. Kiselev, M. T. Caccamoet al.,

Smart Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery Application: Development of Versatile Nanocarrier Platforms in Biotechnology and Nanomedicine

. J. Nanomater. 2019, 1-26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3702518
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. M.D. Rakesh, K. Sudhir, N.S. Brahmaet al.,

Carbon Nanotubes: A Potential Concept for Drug Delivery Applications

. Recent Pat. Drug Delivery Formulation 8, 12-26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2174/1872211308666140124095745
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. B. Wan, J. Hou, L. H. Guo,

Chapter 14 - Safety of Carbon Nanotubes, Industrial Applications of Carbon Nanotubes

, Micro and Nano Technologies, 405431(2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-41481-4.00014-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. X. He, J. Xue, L. Shiet al.,

Recent antioxidative nanomaterials toward wound dressing and disease treatment via ROS scavenging

. Mater. Today Nano 17, 100149 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2021.100149
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. S. Sabra, D.M. Ragab, M.M. Agwaet al.,

Recent advances in electrospun nanofibers for some biomedical applications

. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 144, 105224 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105224
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. A. Galano,

Carbon nanotubes as free-radical scavengers

. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 8922-8927 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp801379g
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. C. Guo, S. Lv, Y. Liuet al.,

Biomarkers for the adverse effects on respiratory system health associated with atmospheric particulate matter exposure

. J. Hazard. Mater. 421, 126760 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126760
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. A.S. Paul, D.K. Eileen, D.Z. Ralphet al.,

Focused Actions to Protect Carbon Nanotube Workers

. Am. J. Ind. Med. 55, 395-411 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22028
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. M. Saeedi, M. Eslamifar, K. Khezriet al.,

Applications of nanotechnology in drug delivery to the central nervous system

. Biomed. Pharmacother. 111, 666-675 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.133
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. P.M. Costa, M. Bourgognon, T.W. Wanget al.,

Functionalised carbon nanotubes: From intracellular uptake and cell-related toxicity to systemic brain delivery

. J. Control Release 241, 200-219 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.09.033
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. C. Ge, L. Meng, L. Xuet al.,

Acute pulmonary and moderate cardiovascular responses of spontaneously hypertensive rats after exposure to single-wall carbon nanotubes

. Nanotoxicology 6, 526-542 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2011.587905
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. H. Wang, J. Wang, X. Denget al.,

Biodistribution of carbon single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice

. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 4, 1019-1024 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2004.146
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. H. Kafa, J.T. Wang, N. Rubioet al.,

The interaction of carbon nanotubes with an in vitro blood-brain barrier model and mouse brain in vivo

. Biomaterials 53, 437-452 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.083
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. X.F. Lu, Y. Zhu, R. Baiet al.,

Long-term pulmonary exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes promotes breast cancer metastatic cascades

, Nature Nanotechnology, 14, 719-727 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0472-4
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. M. Lamberti, P. Pedata, N. Sannoloet al.,

Carbon nanotubes: Properties, biomedical applications, advantages and risks in patients and occupationally-exposed workers

. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 28, 4-13 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0394632015572559
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. M. Boskabady, N. Marefati, T. Farkhondehet al.,

The effect of environmental lead exposure on human health and the contribution of inflammatory mechanisms, a review

. Environ. Int. 120, 404-420 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.013
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. Y. Zhu, T.C. Ran, Y.G. Liet al.,

Observation of growth stimulation of Tetrahymena pyriformis exposed to MWNTs

. Nuclear Techniques 30, 689-693 (2007).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. Y. Zhu, Q.F. Zhao, X.Q. Caiet al.,

Interaction of CNTs with Stylonychia mytilus

. Nuclear Techniques 29, 202-206 (2006).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Q.N. Liet al.,

Interaction of metal ions with CNTs and their effects on environmental toxicology

. Nuclear Techniques 34, 714-720 (2011).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31. O. Shilpa, K.P. Anupama, A. Antonyet al.,

Lead (Pb)-induced oxidative stress mediates sex-specific autistic-like behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster

. Mol. Neurobiol. 58, 6378-6393, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-021-02546-z
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, U. Schweizeret al.,

Comparative analysis of selenocysteine machinery and selenoproteome gene expression in mouse brain identifies neurons as key functional sites of selenium in mammals

. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 2427-2438 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M707951200
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33. T. Tian, J. C. Zhang, H.Z. Leiet al.,

Synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence analysis of Fe, Zn and Cu in mice brain associated with Parkinson’s disease

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 26, 030506 (2015). https://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.26.030506
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34. A.N. Webb, K.M. Spiers, G. Falkenberget al.,

Distribution of Pb and Se in mouse brain following subchronic Pb exposure by using synchrotron X-ray fluorescence

. Neurotoxicology, 88, 106-115 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2021.11.006
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35. I.K. Nina, J.O. Patricia, R.M. Benjaminet al.,

Layer-by-layer assembly of ultrathin composite films from micron-sized graphite oxide sheets and polycations

. Chem. Mater. 11, 771-778 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm981085u
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36. S. Leila, A. Athawale,

Graphene oxide synthesized by using modified hummers approach

. Int. J. Energy. Envir. E. 2, 58-63 (2014).
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37. J.F. Colomer, C. Stephan, S. Lefrantet al.,

Large-scale synthesis of single-wall carbon nanotubes by catalytic chemical vapor deposition CCVD method

. Chem. Phys. Lett. 317, 83-89 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01338-X
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
38. C. Chen, D. Li, W.C. Laiet al.,

Standard sample preparation of Pb element determination in atmospheric particles by XRF

. Nucl. Tech. (in Chinese) 38, 120203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2015.hjs.38.120203
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
39. D. Yang, A. Velamakanni, G. Bozokluet al.,

Chemical analysis of graphene oxide films after heat and chemical treatments by X-ray photoelectron and Micro-Raman spectroscopy

. Carbon 47, 145-152 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.045
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
40. G. Compagnini, F. Giannazzo, S. Sondeet al.,

Ion irradiation and defect formation in single layer graphene

. Carbon 47, 3201-3207 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.07.033
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
41. C. Xiang, Y. Zhang, W. Guoet al.,

Biomimetic carbon nanotubes for neurological disease therapeutics as inherent medication

. Acta. Pharm. Sin. B 10, 239-248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2019.11.003
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
42. M.A. Saleemi, Y.L. Kong, P.V.C. Yong, et al.,

An overview of recent development in therapeutic drug carrier system using carbon nanotubes

. J. Drug. Delivery. Sci. Technol. 59, 101855 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101855
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
43. X. Wang, J.H. Lee, R. Li, et al.,

Toxicological profiling of highly purified single-walled carbon nanotubes with different lengths in the rodent lung and Escherichia Coli

. Small 14, 1703915 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201703915
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
44. X. Zhang, J. Yin, C. Penget al.,

Distribution and biocompatibility studies of graphene oxide in mice after intravenous administration

. Carbon 49, 986-995 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.11.005
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
45. H. Huang, M. Liu, R. Jianget al.,

Facile modification of nanodiamonds with hyperbranched polymers based on supramolecular chemistry and their potential for drug delivery

. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 513, 198-204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.009
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
46. R. Jiang, M. Liu, H. Huanget al.,

Facile fabrication of organic dyed polymer nanoparticles with aggregation-induced emission using an ultrasound-assisted multicomponent reaction and their biological imaging

. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 519, 137-144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.084
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
47. A.A. Shvedova, N. Yanamala, E.R. Kisinet al.,

Long-term effects of carbon containing engineered nanomaterials and asbestos in the lung: one year postexposure comparisons

. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 306, L170-182 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00167.2013
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
48. R.M. Robert, F.S. James, F.H. Annet al.,

Extrapulmonary transport of MWCNT following inhalation exposure

. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 10, 38 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-10-38
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
49. S. Alidori, D.L.J. Thorek, B.J. Beattieet al.,

Carbon nanotubes exhibit fibrillar pharmacology in primates

. PLoS One 12, 0183902 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183902
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
50. Y. Morimoto, M. Horie, N. Kobayashiet al.,

Inhalation toxicity assessment of carbon-based nanoparticles

. Accounts of Chemical Research, 46, 770-781 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200311b
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
51. D.B. Warheit, B.R. Laurence, K.L. Reedet al.,

Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats

. Toxicol. Sci. 77, 117-125 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfg228
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
52. C.W. Lam, J.T. James, R. Mccluskeyet al.,

Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation

. Toxicol. Sci. 77, 126-134 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfg243
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
53. F.D. Wang, L.L. Cao, C. Jinet al.,

Effects of Carbon Nanotubes on Rat Liver and Brain

. Nano 09, 1450083 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793292014500830
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
54. B. Obermeier, A. Verma, R.M. Ransohoff,

The blood-brain barrier

. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 133, 39-59 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63432-0.00003-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
55. Z. Guo, P. Zhang, S. Chakrabortyet al.,

Biotransformation modulates the penetration of metallic nanomaterials across an artificial blood-brain barrier model

. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, 2105245118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105245118
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
56. S. Deepa, S.K. Mamta, A. Anithaet al.,

Exposure of carbon nanotubes affects testis and brain of common carp

. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 95, 103957 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2022.103957
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
57. M.C. Sanchez, S. Lancel, E. Boulangeret al.,

Targeting oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in the treatment of impaired wound healing: A systematic review

. Antioxidants 7, 98 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox7080098
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
58. V.M. Victor, M. Rocha, M. de la Fuente,

Immune cells: free radicals and antioxidants in sepsis

. Int. Immunopharmacol. 4, 327-347 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2004.01.020
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
59. W. Macnee, K. Donaldson, Particulate air Pollution-30: Injurious and protective mechanisms in the lungs. Air Pollution and Health (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012352335-8/50105-8
60. O.I. Aruoma,

Nutrition and health aspects of free radicals and antioxidants

. Fd. Chem. Toxic. 32, 671-683 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6915(94)90011-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
61. M. Ghorbani, H. Derakhshankhah, S. Jafariet al.,

Nanozyme antioxidants as emerging alternatives for natural antioxidants: Achievements and challenges in perspective

. Nano Today 29, 100775 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100775
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
62. J. Wu, X. Wang, Q. Wanget al.,

Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): next-generation artificial enzymes (2)

. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1004-1076 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00457a
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
63. S. Prakash, M. Malhotra, W. Shaoet al.,

Polymeric nanohybrids and functionalized carbon nanotubes as drug delivery carriers for cancer therapy

. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 63, 1340-1351 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.06.013
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
64. V. Amenta, K. Aschberger,

Carbon nanotubes: potential medical applications and safety concerns

. Wiley. Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 7, 371-386 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1317
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
65. J. Kayat, V. Gajbhiye, R.K. Tekadeet al.,

Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes: a systematic report

. Nanomedicine 7, 40-49 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2010.06.008
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
66. I. Ingold, C. Berndt, S. Schmittet al.,

Selenium Utilization by GPX4 Is Required to Prevent Hydroperoxide-Induced Ferroptosis

. Cell 172, 409-422 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.048
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
Footnote

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.